This document provides an introduction and overview of MapReduce, a programming model for processing large datasets across distributed systems. It describes how MapReduce allows users to specify map and reduce functions to parallelize computations across large clusters. The key advantages are that it hides the complexity of parallelization, fault tolerance, and load balancing. It also provides an example implementation at Google that processes vast amounts of data across thousands of machines every day.
Implementation of p pic algorithm in map reduce to handle big dataeSAT Publishing House
IJRET : International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology is an international peer reviewed, online journal published by eSAT Publishing House for the enhancement of research in various disciplines of Engineering and Technology. The aim and scope of the journal is to provide an academic medium and an important reference for the advancement and dissemination of research results that support high-level learning, teaching and research in the fields of Engineering and Technology. We bring together Scientists, Academician, Field Engineers, Scholars and Students of related fields of Engineering and Technology.
Survey of Parallel Data Processing in Context with MapReduce cscpconf
MapReduce is a parallel programming model and an associated implementation introduced by
Google. In the programming model, a user specifies the computation by two functions, Map and Reduce. The underlying MapReduce library automatically parallelizes the computation, and handles complicated issues like data distribution, load balancing and fault tolerance. The original MapReduce implementation by Google, as well as its open-source counterpart,Hadoop, is aimed for parallelizing computing in large clusters of commodity machines.This paper gives an overview of MapReduce programming model and its applications. The author has described here the workflow of MapReduce process. Some important issues, like fault tolerance, are studied in more detail. Even the illustration of working of Map Reduce is given. The data locality issue in heterogeneous environments can noticeably reduce the Map Reduce performance. In this paper, the author has addressed the illustration of data across nodes in a way that each node has a balanced data processing load stored in a parallel manner. Given a data intensive application running on a Hadoop Map Reduce cluster, the auhor has exemplified how data placement is done in Hadoop architecture and the role of Map Reduce in the Hadoop Architecture. The amount of data stored in each node to achieve improved data-processing performance is explained here.
There is a growing trend of applications that ought to handle huge information. However, analysing huge information may be a terribly difficult drawback nowadays. For such data many techniques can be considered. The technologies like Grid Computing, Volunteering Computing, and RDBMS can be considered as potential techniques to handle such data. We have a still in growing phase Hadoop Tool to handle such data also. We will do a survey on all this techniques to find a potential technique to manage and work with Big Data.
The objective of this paper is to present the hybrid approach for edge detection. Under this technique, edge
detection is performed in two phase. In first phase, Canny Algorithm is applied for image smoothing and in
second phase neural network is to detecting actual edges. Neural network is a wonderful tool for edge
detection. As it is a non-linear network with built-in thresholding capability. Neural Network can be trained
with back propagation technique using few training patterns but the most important and difficult part is to
identify the correct and proper training set.
MAP REDUCE BASED ON CLOAK DHT DATA REPLICATION EVALUATIONijdms
Distributed databases and data replication are effective ways to increase the accessibility and reliability of
un-structured, semi-structured and structured data to extract new knowledge. Replications offer better
performance and greater availability of data. With the advent of Big Data, new storage and processing
challenges are emerging.
To meet these challenges, Hadoop and DHTs compete in the storage domain and MapReduce and others in
distributed processing, with their strengths and weaknesses.
We propose an analysis of the circular and radial replication mechanisms of the CLOAK DHT. We
evaluate their performance through a comparative study of data from simulations. The results show that
radial replication is better in storage, unlike circular replication, which gives better search results.
Cloud has been a computational and storage solution for many data centric organizations. The
problem today those organizations are facing from the cloud is in data searching in an efficient
manner. A framework is required to distribute the work of searching and fetching from
thousands of computers. The data in HDFS is scattered and needs lots of time to retrieve. The
major idea is to design a web server in the map phase using the jetty web server which will give
a fast and efficient way of searching data in MapReduce paradigm. For real time processing on
Hadoop, a searchable mechanism is implemented in HDFS by creating a multilevel index in
web server with multi-level index keys. The web server uses to handle traffic throughput. By web
clustering technology we can improve the application performance. To keep the work down, the
load balancer should automatically be able to distribute load to the newly added nodes in the
server.
Moore’s law has finally hit the wall and CPU speeds have actually decreased in the last few years. The industry is reacting with hardware with an ever-growing number of cores and software that can leverage “grids” of distributed, often commodity, computing resources. But how is a traditional Java developer supposed to easily take advantage of this revolution? The answer is the Apache Hadoop family of projects. Hadoop is a suite of Open Source APIs at the forefront of this grid computing revolution and is considered the absolute gold standard for the divide-and-conquer model of distributed problem crunching. The well-travelled Apache Hadoop framework is currently being leveraged in production by prominent names such as Yahoo, IBM, Amazon, Adobe, AOL, Facebook and Hulu just to name a few.
In this session, you’ll start by learning the vocabulary unique to the distributed computing space. Next, we’ll discover how to shape a problem and processing to fit the Hadoop MapReduce framework. We’ll then examine the incredible auto-replicating, redundant and self-healing HDFS filesystem. Finally, we’ll fire up several Hadoop nodes and watch our calculation process get devoured live by our Hadoop grid. At this talk’s conclusion, you’ll feel equipped to take on any massive data set and processing your employer can throw at you with absolute ease.
Implementation of p pic algorithm in map reduce to handle big dataeSAT Publishing House
IJRET : International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology is an international peer reviewed, online journal published by eSAT Publishing House for the enhancement of research in various disciplines of Engineering and Technology. The aim and scope of the journal is to provide an academic medium and an important reference for the advancement and dissemination of research results that support high-level learning, teaching and research in the fields of Engineering and Technology. We bring together Scientists, Academician, Field Engineers, Scholars and Students of related fields of Engineering and Technology.
Survey of Parallel Data Processing in Context with MapReduce cscpconf
MapReduce is a parallel programming model and an associated implementation introduced by
Google. In the programming model, a user specifies the computation by two functions, Map and Reduce. The underlying MapReduce library automatically parallelizes the computation, and handles complicated issues like data distribution, load balancing and fault tolerance. The original MapReduce implementation by Google, as well as its open-source counterpart,Hadoop, is aimed for parallelizing computing in large clusters of commodity machines.This paper gives an overview of MapReduce programming model and its applications. The author has described here the workflow of MapReduce process. Some important issues, like fault tolerance, are studied in more detail. Even the illustration of working of Map Reduce is given. The data locality issue in heterogeneous environments can noticeably reduce the Map Reduce performance. In this paper, the author has addressed the illustration of data across nodes in a way that each node has a balanced data processing load stored in a parallel manner. Given a data intensive application running on a Hadoop Map Reduce cluster, the auhor has exemplified how data placement is done in Hadoop architecture and the role of Map Reduce in the Hadoop Architecture. The amount of data stored in each node to achieve improved data-processing performance is explained here.
There is a growing trend of applications that ought to handle huge information. However, analysing huge information may be a terribly difficult drawback nowadays. For such data many techniques can be considered. The technologies like Grid Computing, Volunteering Computing, and RDBMS can be considered as potential techniques to handle such data. We have a still in growing phase Hadoop Tool to handle such data also. We will do a survey on all this techniques to find a potential technique to manage and work with Big Data.
The objective of this paper is to present the hybrid approach for edge detection. Under this technique, edge
detection is performed in two phase. In first phase, Canny Algorithm is applied for image smoothing and in
second phase neural network is to detecting actual edges. Neural network is a wonderful tool for edge
detection. As it is a non-linear network with built-in thresholding capability. Neural Network can be trained
with back propagation technique using few training patterns but the most important and difficult part is to
identify the correct and proper training set.
MAP REDUCE BASED ON CLOAK DHT DATA REPLICATION EVALUATIONijdms
Distributed databases and data replication are effective ways to increase the accessibility and reliability of
un-structured, semi-structured and structured data to extract new knowledge. Replications offer better
performance and greater availability of data. With the advent of Big Data, new storage and processing
challenges are emerging.
To meet these challenges, Hadoop and DHTs compete in the storage domain and MapReduce and others in
distributed processing, with their strengths and weaknesses.
We propose an analysis of the circular and radial replication mechanisms of the CLOAK DHT. We
evaluate their performance through a comparative study of data from simulations. The results show that
radial replication is better in storage, unlike circular replication, which gives better search results.
Cloud has been a computational and storage solution for many data centric organizations. The
problem today those organizations are facing from the cloud is in data searching in an efficient
manner. A framework is required to distribute the work of searching and fetching from
thousands of computers. The data in HDFS is scattered and needs lots of time to retrieve. The
major idea is to design a web server in the map phase using the jetty web server which will give
a fast and efficient way of searching data in MapReduce paradigm. For real time processing on
Hadoop, a searchable mechanism is implemented in HDFS by creating a multilevel index in
web server with multi-level index keys. The web server uses to handle traffic throughput. By web
clustering technology we can improve the application performance. To keep the work down, the
load balancer should automatically be able to distribute load to the newly added nodes in the
server.
Moore’s law has finally hit the wall and CPU speeds have actually decreased in the last few years. The industry is reacting with hardware with an ever-growing number of cores and software that can leverage “grids” of distributed, often commodity, computing resources. But how is a traditional Java developer supposed to easily take advantage of this revolution? The answer is the Apache Hadoop family of projects. Hadoop is a suite of Open Source APIs at the forefront of this grid computing revolution and is considered the absolute gold standard for the divide-and-conquer model of distributed problem crunching. The well-travelled Apache Hadoop framework is currently being leveraged in production by prominent names such as Yahoo, IBM, Amazon, Adobe, AOL, Facebook and Hulu just to name a few.
In this session, you’ll start by learning the vocabulary unique to the distributed computing space. Next, we’ll discover how to shape a problem and processing to fit the Hadoop MapReduce framework. We’ll then examine the incredible auto-replicating, redundant and self-healing HDFS filesystem. Finally, we’ll fire up several Hadoop nodes and watch our calculation process get devoured live by our Hadoop grid. At this talk’s conclusion, you’ll feel equipped to take on any massive data set and processing your employer can throw at you with absolute ease.
Design Issues and Challenges of Peer-to-Peer Video on Demand System cscpconf
P2P media streaming and file downloading is most popular applications over the Internet.
These systems reduce the server load and provide a scalable content distribution. P2P
networking is a new paradigm to build distributed applications. It describes the design
requirements for P2P media streaming, live and Video on demand system comparison based on their system architecture. In this paper we described and studied the traditional approaches for P2P streaming systems, design issues, challenges, and current approaches for providing P2P VoD services.
LARGE-SCALE DATA PROCESSING USING MAPREDUCE IN CLOUD COMPUTING ENVIRONMENTijwscjournal
The computer industry is being challenged to develop methods and techniques for affordable data processing on large datasets at optimum response times. The technical challenges in dealing with the increasing demand to handle vast quantities of data is daunting and on the rise. One of the recent processing models with a more efficient and intuitive solution to rapidly process large amount of data in parallel is called MapReduce. It is a framework defining a template approach of programming to perform large-scale data computation on clusters of machines in a cloud computing environment. MapReduce provides automatic parallelization and distribution of computation based on several processors. It hides the complexity of writing parallel and distributed programming code. This paper provides a comprehensive systematic review and analysis of large-scale dataset processing and dataset handling challenges and
requirements in a cloud computing environment by using the MapReduce framework and its open-source implementation Hadoop. We defined requirements for MapReduce systems to perform large-scale data processing. We also proposed the MapReduce framework and one implementation of this framework on Amazon Web Services. At the end of the paper, we presented an experimentation of running MapReduce
system in a cloud environment. This paper outlines one of the best techniques to process large datasets is MapReduce; it also can help developers to do parallel and distributed computation in a cloud environment.
Hadoop helps to make big data tasks feasible by providing two important services: while HDFS introduces controlled redundancy to prevent data loss, the Map/Reduce framework encourages algorithm designers to read and write data sequentially and thus optimize throughput and resource utilization. In this talk we dive into the details of how sequential access affects performance. In the first part of the talk, we show that sequential access is important not only for hard drives, but all storage components used in today's computers. Based on this observation, we then discuss statistical techniques to improve performance of common analytical tasks. In particular, we show how randomness can be used strategically to improve speed and possibly accuracy.
Presenter: Ulrich Rückert, Datameer
Enhancement of Map Function Image Processing System Using DHRF Algorithm on B...AM Publications
Cloud computing is the concept of distributing a work and also processing the same work over the internet. Cloud
computing is called as service on demand. It is always available on the internet in Pay and Use mode. Processing of the Big
Data takes more time to compute MRI and DICOM data. The processing of hard tasks like this can be solved by using the
concept of MapReduce. MapReduce function is a concept of Map and Reduce functions. Map is the process of splitting or
dividing data. Reduce function is the process of integrating the output of the Map’s input to produce the result. The Map
function does two various image processing techniques to process the input data. Java Advanced Imaging (JAI) is introduced
in the map function in this proposed work. The processed intermediate data of the Map function is sent to the Reduce function
for the further process. The Dynamic Handover Reduce Function (DHRF) algorithm is introduced in the reduce function in
this work. This algorithm is implemented in the Reduce function to reduce the waiting time while processing the intermediate
data. The DHRF algorithm gives the final output by processing the Reduce function. The enhanced MapReduce concept and
proposed optimized algorithm is made to work on Euca2ool (a Cloud tool) to produce an effective and better output when
compared with the previous work in the field of Cloud Computing and Big Data.
International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) is an open access online peer reviewed international journal that publishes research and review articles in the fields of Computer Science, Neural Networks, Electrical Engineering, Software Engineering, Information Technology, Mechanical Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Plastic Engineering, Food Technology, Textile Engineering, Nano Technology & science, Power Electronics, Electronics & Communication Engineering, Computational mathematics, Image processing, Civil Engineering, Structural Engineering, Environmental Engineering, VLSI Testing & Low Power VLSI Design etc.
Self adjusting slot configurations for homogeneous and heterogeneous hadoop c...LeMeniz Infotech
Self adjusting slot configurations for homogeneous and heterogeneous hadoop clusters
Do Your Projects With Technology Experts
To Get this projects Call : 9566355386 / 99625 88976
Web : http://www.lemenizinfotech.com
Web : http://www.ieeemaster.com
Mail : projects@lemenizinfotech.com
Blog : http://ieeeprojectspondicherry.weebly.com
Blog : http://www.ieeeprojectsinpondicherry.blogspot.in/
Youtube:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eesBNUnKvws
On Traffic-Aware Partition and Aggregation in Map Reduce for Big Data Applica...dbpublications
The MapReduce programming model simplifies
large-scale data processing on commodity cluster by
exploiting parallel map tasks and reduces tasks.
Although many efforts have been made to improve
the performance of MapReduce jobs, they ignore the
network traffic generated in the shuffle phase, which
plays a critical role in performance enhancement.
Traditionally, a hash function is used to partition
intermediate data among reduce tasks, which,
however, is not traffic-efficient because network
topology and data size associated with each key are
not taken into consideration. In this paper, we study
to reduce network traffic cost for a MapReduce job
by designing a novel intermediate data partition
scheme. Furthermore, we jointly consider the
aggregator placement problem, where each
aggregator can reduce merged traffic from multiple
map tasks. A decomposition-based distributed
algorithm is proposed to deal with the large-scale
optimization problem for big data application and an
online algorithm is also designed to adjust data
partition and aggregation in a dynamic manner.
Finally, extensive simulation results demonstrate that
our proposals can significantly reduce network traffic
cost under both offline and online cases.
Slack (or Teams) Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Soluti...Jeffrey Haguewood
Sidekick Solutions uses Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apricot) and automation solutions to integrate data for business workflows.
We believe integration and automation are essential to user experience and the promise of efficient work through technology. Automation is the critical ingredient to realizing that full vision. We develop integration products and services for Bonterra Case Management software to support the deployment of automations for a variety of use cases.
This video focuses on the notifications, alerts, and approval requests using Slack for Bonterra Impact Management. The solutions covered in this webinar can also be deployed for Microsoft Teams.
Interested in deploying notification automations for Bonterra Impact Management? Contact us at sales@sidekicksolutionsllc.com to discuss next steps.
Connector Corner: Automate dynamic content and events by pushing a buttonDianaGray10
Here is something new! In our next Connector Corner webinar, we will demonstrate how you can use a single workflow to:
Create a campaign using Mailchimp with merge tags/fields
Send an interactive Slack channel message (using buttons)
Have the message received by managers and peers along with a test email for review
But there’s more:
In a second workflow supporting the same use case, you’ll see:
Your campaign sent to target colleagues for approval
If the “Approve” button is clicked, a Jira/Zendesk ticket is created for the marketing design team
But—if the “Reject” button is pushed, colleagues will be alerted via Slack message
Join us to learn more about this new, human-in-the-loop capability, brought to you by Integration Service connectors.
And...
Speakers:
Akshay Agnihotri, Product Manager
Charlie Greenberg, Host
Software Delivery At the Speed of AI: Inflectra Invests In AI-Powered QualityInflectra
In this insightful webinar, Inflectra explores how artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming software development and testing. Discover how AI-powered tools are revolutionizing every stage of the software development lifecycle (SDLC), from design and prototyping to testing, deployment, and monitoring.
Learn about:
• The Future of Testing: How AI is shifting testing towards verification, analysis, and higher-level skills, while reducing repetitive tasks.
• Test Automation: How AI-powered test case generation, optimization, and self-healing tests are making testing more efficient and effective.
• Visual Testing: Explore the emerging capabilities of AI in visual testing and how it's set to revolutionize UI verification.
• Inflectra's AI Solutions: See demonstrations of Inflectra's cutting-edge AI tools like the ChatGPT plugin and Azure Open AI platform, designed to streamline your testing process.
Whether you're a developer, tester, or QA professional, this webinar will give you valuable insights into how AI is shaping the future of software delivery.
JMeter webinar - integration with InfluxDB and GrafanaRTTS
Watch this recorded webinar about real-time monitoring of application performance. See how to integrate Apache JMeter, the open-source leader in performance testing, with InfluxDB, the open-source time-series database, and Grafana, the open-source analytics and visualization application.
In this webinar, we will review the benefits of leveraging InfluxDB and Grafana when executing load tests and demonstrate how these tools are used to visualize performance metrics.
Length: 30 minutes
Session Overview
-------------------------------------------
During this webinar, we will cover the following topics while demonstrating the integrations of JMeter, InfluxDB and Grafana:
- What out-of-the-box solutions are available for real-time monitoring JMeter tests?
- What are the benefits of integrating InfluxDB and Grafana into the load testing stack?
- Which features are provided by Grafana?
- Demonstration of InfluxDB and Grafana using a practice web application
To view the webinar recording, go to:
https://www.rttsweb.com/jmeter-integration-webinar
GraphRAG is All You need? LLM & Knowledge GraphGuy Korland
Guy Korland, CEO and Co-founder of FalkorDB, will review two articles on the integration of language models with knowledge graphs.
1. Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmap.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.08302
2. Microsoft Research's GraphRAG paper and a review paper on various uses of knowledge graphs:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/blog/graphrag-unlocking-llm-discovery-on-narrative-private-data/
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...DanBrown980551
Do you want to learn how to model and simulate an electrical network from scratch in under an hour?
Then welcome to this PowSyBl workshop, hosted by Rte, the French Transmission System Operator (TSO)!
During the webinar, you will discover the PowSyBl ecosystem as well as handle and study an electrical network through an interactive Python notebook.
PowSyBl is an open source project hosted by LF Energy, which offers a comprehensive set of features for electrical grid modelling and simulation. Among other advanced features, PowSyBl provides:
- A fully editable and extendable library for grid component modelling;
- Visualization tools to display your network;
- Grid simulation tools, such as power flows, security analyses (with or without remedial actions) and sensitivity analyses;
The framework is mostly written in Java, with a Python binding so that Python developers can access PowSyBl functionalities as well.
What you will learn during the webinar:
- For beginners: discover PowSyBl's functionalities through a quick general presentation and the notebook, without needing any expert coding skills;
- For advanced developers: master the skills to efficiently apply PowSyBl functionalities to your real-world scenarios.
Essentials of Automations: Optimizing FME Workflows with ParametersSafe Software
Are you looking to streamline your workflows and boost your projects’ efficiency? Do you find yourself searching for ways to add flexibility and control over your FME workflows? If so, you’re in the right place.
Join us for an insightful dive into the world of FME parameters, a critical element in optimizing workflow efficiency. This webinar marks the beginning of our three-part “Essentials of Automation” series. This first webinar is designed to equip you with the knowledge and skills to utilize parameters effectively: enhancing the flexibility, maintainability, and user control of your FME projects.
Here’s what you’ll gain:
- Essentials of FME Parameters: Understand the pivotal role of parameters, including Reader/Writer, Transformer, User, and FME Flow categories. Discover how they are the key to unlocking automation and optimization within your workflows.
- Practical Applications in FME Form: Delve into key user parameter types including choice, connections, and file URLs. Allow users to control how a workflow runs, making your workflows more reusable. Learn to import values and deliver the best user experience for your workflows while enhancing accuracy.
- Optimization Strategies in FME Flow: Explore the creation and strategic deployment of parameters in FME Flow, including the use of deployment and geometry parameters, to maximize workflow efficiency.
- Pro Tips for Success: Gain insights on parameterizing connections and leveraging new features like Conditional Visibility for clarity and simplicity.
We’ll wrap up with a glimpse into future webinars, followed by a Q&A session to address your specific questions surrounding this topic.
Don’t miss this opportunity to elevate your FME expertise and drive your projects to new heights of efficiency.
State of ICS and IoT Cyber Threat Landscape Report 2024 previewPrayukth K V
The IoT and OT threat landscape report has been prepared by the Threat Research Team at Sectrio using data from Sectrio, cyber threat intelligence farming facilities spread across over 85 cities around the world. In addition, Sectrio also runs AI-based advanced threat and payload engagement facilities that serve as sinks to attract and engage sophisticated threat actors, and newer malware including new variants and latent threats that are at an earlier stage of development.
The latest edition of the OT/ICS and IoT security Threat Landscape Report 2024 also covers:
State of global ICS asset and network exposure
Sectoral targets and attacks as well as the cost of ransom
Global APT activity, AI usage, actor and tactic profiles, and implications
Rise in volumes of AI-powered cyberattacks
Major cyber events in 2024
Malware and malicious payload trends
Cyberattack types and targets
Vulnerability exploit attempts on CVEs
Attacks on counties – USA
Expansion of bot farms – how, where, and why
In-depth analysis of the cyber threat landscape across North America, South America, Europe, APAC, and the Middle East
Why are attacks on smart factories rising?
Cyber risk predictions
Axis of attacks – Europe
Systemic attacks in the Middle East
Download the full report from here:
https://sectrio.com/resources/ot-threat-landscape-reports/sectrio-releases-ot-ics-and-iot-security-threat-landscape-report-2024/
Dev Dives: Train smarter, not harder – active learning and UiPath LLMs for do...UiPathCommunity
💥 Speed, accuracy, and scaling – discover the superpowers of GenAI in action with UiPath Document Understanding and Communications Mining™:
See how to accelerate model training and optimize model performance with active learning
Learn about the latest enhancements to out-of-the-box document processing – with little to no training required
Get an exclusive demo of the new family of UiPath LLMs – GenAI models specialized for processing different types of documents and messages
This is a hands-on session specifically designed for automation developers and AI enthusiasts seeking to enhance their knowledge in leveraging the latest intelligent document processing capabilities offered by UiPath.
Speakers:
👨🏫 Andras Palfi, Senior Product Manager, UiPath
👩🏫 Lenka Dulovicova, Product Program Manager, UiPath
Kubernetes & AI - Beauty and the Beast !?! @KCD Istanbul 2024Tobias Schneck
As AI technology is pushing into IT I was wondering myself, as an “infrastructure container kubernetes guy”, how get this fancy AI technology get managed from an infrastructure operational view? Is it possible to apply our lovely cloud native principals as well? What benefit’s both technologies could bring to each other?
Let me take this questions and provide you a short journey through existing deployment models and use cases for AI software. On practical examples, we discuss what cloud/on-premise strategy we may need for applying it to our own infrastructure to get it to work from an enterprise perspective. I want to give an overview about infrastructure requirements and technologies, what could be beneficial or limiting your AI use cases in an enterprise environment. An interactive Demo will give you some insides, what approaches I got already working for real.
5. The problem
High
In-memory Hadoop
Query Entropy
(Offline)
Key-value ?
Low
(Online)
Low High
Query Latency
Thursday, 12 April 12
6. “The Apache Hadoop project
develops open-source software
for reliable, scalable,
distributed computing”
Thursday, 12 April 12
7. MapReduce: Simplified Data Processing on Large Clusters
Jeffrey Dean and Sanjay Ghemawat
jeff@google.com, sanjay@google.com
Google, Inc.
Abstract given day, etc. Most such computations are conceptu-
ally straightforward. However, the input data is usually
MapReduce is a programming model and an associ- large and the computations have to be distributed across
ated implementation for processing and generating large hundreds or thousands of machines in order to finish in
data sets. Users specify a map function that processes a a reasonable amount of time. The issues of how to par-
key/value pair to generate a set of intermediate key/value allelize the computation, distribute the data, and handle
pairs, and a reduce function that merges all intermediate failures conspire to obscure the original simple compu-
values associated with the same intermediate key. Many tation with large amounts of complex code to deal with
real world tasks are expressible in this model, as shown these issues.
in the paper. As a reaction to this complexity, we designed a new
Programs written in this functional style are automati- abstraction that allows us to express the simple computa-
cally parallelized and executed on a large cluster of com- tions we were trying to perform but hides the messy de-
modity machines. The run-time system takes care of the tails of parallelization, fault-tolerance, data distribution
Google’s MapReduce
details of partitioning the input data, scheduling the pro- and load balancing in a library. Our abstraction is in-
gram’s execution across a set of machines, handling ma- spired by the map and reduce primitives present in Lisp
chine failures, and managing the required inter-machine and many other functional languages. We realized that
communication. This allows programmers without any most of our computations involved applying a map op-
experience with parallel and distributed systems to eas- eration to each logical “record” in our input in order to
ily utilize the resources of a large distributed system. compute a set of intermediate key/value pairs, and then
Our implementation of MapReduce runs on a large applying a reduce operation to all the values that shared
cluster of commodity machines and is highly scalable: the same key, in order to combine the derived data ap-
Thursday, 12 April 12 propriately. Our use of a functional model with user-
8. Distributed Storage
MapReduce: Simplified Data Processing on Large Clusters
Jeffrey Dean and Sanjay Ghemawat
MapReduce: Simplified Data Processing on Large Clusters
jeff@google.com, sanjay@google.com
Google, Inc.
Jeffrey Dean and Sanjay Ghemawat
MapReduce: Simplified Data Processing on Large Clusters
jeff@google.com, sanjay@google.com
Abstract given day, etc. Most such computations are conceptu-
Google, Inc. ally straightforward. However, the input data is usually
Jeffrey Dean and Sanjay Ghemawatmodel and an associ-
MapReduce is a programming large and the computations have to be distributed across
ated implementation for processing and generating large hundreds or thousands of machines in order to finish in
jeff@google.com, sanjay@google.com function that processes a
data sets. Users specify a map
MapReduce: Simplified Data Processing on Large Clusters key/value pair to generate a set of intermediate key/value
a reasonable amount of time. The issues of how to par-
allelize the computation, distribute the data, and handle
Abstract a reduce function that merges all intermediate such computations are conceptu-
pairs, Google, Inc.
and given day, etc. Most
failures conspire to obscure the original simple compu-
values associated with the same intermediate key. ManyHowever, the input data is usually
MapReduce is a programming model and an associ-
ally straightforward.
tation with large amounts of complex code to deal with
Jeffrey Dean and Sanjay Ghemawat real world tasks are expressible largemodel, computations have to be distributed across
this and the
ated implementation for processing and generating large in hundreds or as shown of these issues. order to finish in
thousands machines in
data sets. Users specify a in thefunction that processes a
map paper. a reasonable amount of time. Thereaction to thisto par-
As a issues of how complexity, we designed a new
jeff@google.com, sanjay@google.com Abstract Programs written key/value Most such are automati- areabstraction that allows
given day, etc. computations conceptu-
key/value pair to generate a set of intermediate in this functional stylethe computation, distribute the data, and us to express the simple computa-
allelize handle
ally straightforward.large clusterthe com- data is usually
However, of input
Google, Inc. MapReduce is apairs, and a reduce function that merges all intermediate on a
programming model and cally parallelized andand the computations conspirebe distributed across trying to perform but hides the messy de-
an associ- large
executed
failures have to to obscure thewe were simple compu-
tions original
values associated with the modity machines. The run-time system takes care of the
same intermediate key. Many
ated implementation for processing and generating large tation with large amounts tails of parallelization, fault-tolerance, data distribution
of finish in code to deal with
complex
hundreds or thousands of machines in order to
data sets. Users specifyworld tasks are expressible in this model, as shown data, scheduling the pro- of how to par-
real a map function that processes partitioning the input these issues.
details of a and load balancing in a library. Our abstraction is in-
gram’s execution reasonable amount of time. The issues
key/value pair to generatepaper.of intermediate key/value
in the a set
a across a set of machines, handling ma-
As distribute to data, and handle map and reduce primitives present in Lisp
spired by the
allelize the computation, a reaction thethis complexity, we designed a new
chine failures, and managing the required inter-machine
pairs, and a reduce function that merges all intermediate style are automati- toabstraction that allowssimple compu-other functional languages. We realized that
and manythe simple computa-
Abstract given day, etc. Most such computations are conceptu- Programs written in this functional conspire obscure the original us to express
failuresallows
Replicated Blocks
communication. This of com- programmers without any
values associated with the same intermediate key. on a large cluster with large amounts of complex code to deal but hides the messy involved applying a map op-
cally parallelized and executed Many most of our computations de-
ally straightforward. However, the input data is usually tation tions we were trying to perform with
MapReduce is a programming model and an associ- large and the computations have to be distributed across real world tasks are expressible in this model, as shown withthese issues. distributedof parallelization, fault-tolerance, data distribution in our input in order to
experience parallel and
modity machines. The run-time system takes care of the tails
systems to eas- eration to each logical “record”
ated implementation for processing and generating large in the paper. ily utilize the resources ofpro-
a large distributed system.
details of partitioning the input data, scheduling a reaction to and load balancing in a library. new set of intermediate key/value pairs, and then
compute a
hundreds or thousands of machines in order to finish in As the this complexity, we designed a Our abstraction is in-
data sets. Users specify a map function that processes a a reasonable amount of time. The issues of how to par- gram’s functional style a setOurmachines, handling ma- allows usrunsthe map and reduce primitives present in Lisp all the values that shared
of implementation of that
Programs written in thisexecution across are automati- abstraction spired to express the simple computa- reduce operation to
MapReduce by on a large applying a
key/value pair to generate a set of intermediate key/value allelize the computation, distribute the data, and handle cally parallelized and executed on and managing of com-commodity machines and to many other functional messy de- on Largethat
chine failures, a large cluster the requiredtions we were trying is performscalable:Processing We realized combine the derived data ap-
cluster of MapReduce: Simplified Data
inter-machine and highly but hides thethe same key, in order to Clusters
languages.
pairs, and a reduce function that merges all intermediate failures conspire to obscure the original simple compu- communication. This allows programmers without any
care of the most of our computations propriately. Our use mapaop-
modity machines. The run-time system takes a typical MapReduce computation processes many ter- involved applying a of functional model with user-
tails of parallelization, fault-tolerance, data distribution
values associated with the same intermediate key. Many tation with large amounts of complex code to deal with experience data, scheduling distributed on thousands of machines. Programmers “record” in map and in order to
abytes of data
details of partitioning the inputwith parallel and the pro- systems to balancingeration to each Our abstraction is in-
and load eas- in a library. logical
specified our input reduce operations allows us to paral-
real world tasks are expressible in this model, as shown these issues. a large system easy to by the map Jeffrey Dean and Sanjay in large computations then and to use re-execution
gram’s execution across a set the machines, of find thema- spired
use: MapReduce intermediate key/value pairs, and easily
ily utilize of resources handling distributed system. hundreds ofreduce set of pro- present Ghemawat
compute a primitives
and
lelize
Lisp
in the paper. As a reaction to this complexity, we designed a new MapReduce: Simplified Data Processing one thou- as the primary
grams have been implemented and applying a on Large Clustersvalues that shared fault tolerance.
upwards ofreduce operation to all the mechanism for
chine failures, and managing the required inter-machine runs on a large functional languages. We realized that
Our implementation of MapReduce and many other
Programs written in this functional style are automati- abstraction that allows us to express the simple computa- sand MapReduce jobs are executed onjeff@google.com, sanjay@google.com contributions ap-this work are a simple and
cluster of programmers without any Google’s clusters to combine the derived data of
the same key, in order
communication. This allows commodity machines and is highly of our computations involved applying a map op- The major
most scalable:
cally parallelized and executed on a large cluster of com- tions we were trying to perform but hides the messy de- experience with parallel andMapReduce systems today.processes many each logical “record” Our use of apowerfulto model that enables automatic parallelization
every eas-
a typical distributed computation eration to ter- propriately. in our input in order interface with user-
functional
modity machines. The run-time system takes care of the tails of parallelization, fault-tolerance, data distribution ily utilize the resources of oflarge distributed system. specified mapGoogle, Inc. distribution of large-scale computations, combined
and
abytes a data on thousands of machines.Dean and set of intermediate key/value pairs, and then allows us to paral-
Jeffrey compute a Sanjay Ghemawatand reduce with an implementation of this interface that achieves
Programmers operations
details of partitioning the input data, scheduling the pro- and load balancing in a library. Our abstraction is in- Our implementation the system easy to use:1hundreds of MapReduceapro-
find of MapReduce runs on a large lelize large computations easily and to use re-execution
applying reduce operation to all the values that shared
Introduction
gram’s execution across a set of machines, handling ma- spired by the map and reduce primitives present in Lisp MapReduce: Simplified scalable: the one key, Large Clusters derived Section 2 describeslargebasic programming model and
cluster of commodity machines and is highlyData upwards ofsame thou- in order toprimary mechanism for fault tolerance.
grams have been implemented and Processing on as the combine the
jeff@google.com, sanjay@google.com
high performance on
data ap-
the
clusters of commodity PCs.
chine failures, and managing the required inter-machine and many other functional languages. We realized that sand MapReduceprocessesexecuted on Google’s clusters useThe a functional model with user- are a simple and
a typical MapReduce computation jobs are many ter- propriately. Our of major contributions of this work
communication. This allows programmers without any most of our computations involved applying a map op- every day.
abytes of data on thousands of machines. Programmers AbstractInc.
Google,
Over the past five years, mapauthors and many othersthat enables paral- Most such computations are conceptu-
specified the and powerful interface allows us to automatic parallelization
reduce operations at given day, etc. examples. Section 3 describes an imple-
gives several
Google have implemented computationsspecial-purpose ally straightforward.MapReduce interface tailored towards
lelize large hundreds of easily andof use re-executionof the combined
mentation
experience with parallel and distributed systems to eas- eration to each logical “record” in our input in order to find the system easy to use: hundreds of MapReduce pro- is a programming model and an associ- large-scale computations,However, the input data is usually
and distribution to
Jeffrey Dean and Sanjay Ghemawat mechanism for fault tolerance.ourand interface that achieves to be distributed acrossde-
MapReduce that process large amounts of raw data, large cluster-based computing environment. Section 4
ily utilize the resources of a large distributed system. compute a set of intermediate key/value pairs, and then computations as the primary with an implementation of this the computations have
grams have been implemented and upwards of one thou-
Our implementation of MapReduce runs on a large applying a reduce operation to all the values that shared 1 Introduction ated implementationdocuments, contributions of thisetc.,on largescribes and
such as crawled for processing and generating large to hundreds several refinements of the programming model
jeff@google.com,Users The map
web high performance
request logs,
sand MapReduce jobs are executed on Google’s clusters specify amajor function that processes a are a simple orof commodity machines in order to finish in
work clusters thousands of PCs.
data sets. sanjay@google.comderived data, such as inverted a reasonable amount ofuseful. The issues of how to par-
compute various kinds of
cluster of commodity machines and is highly scalable: the same key, in order to combine the derived data ap- every day. Abstract given day, etc. 2 describes parallelization are conceptu- Section 5 has performance
Section automatic computations found time.
that we have
powerful interface that enables Most suchthe basic programming model and
key/value pair to generate a set of intermediate key/value
a typical MapReduce computation processes many ter- propriately. Our use of a functional model with user- Over the past five years, the authors and many others at allyoflarge-scale computations,measurements of usually
indices, various representations gives severalstructure allelize inputdescribes an distribute the data, and variety of
the graph examples. Section
Google, Inc. summaries of straightforward. However,tasks.the3computation, imple-
combineddata is
the our implementation for a handle
pairs, and documents, distribution of
and
MapReduce is a programming web a reduce function that merges allthe computations have tointerface tailored towardsoriginalMapReduce within
intermediate
abytes of data on thousands of machines. Programmers specified map and reduce operations allows us to paral- Google have implementedof model andspecial-purpose largethe number of pages failures beSection to explores the use of simple compu-
hundreds of an associ-
with an implementation of this the MapReduce conspire obscure
and
mentation of interface that achieves distributed across the
6
lelize large computations easily and to use re-execution 1 Introduction ated computations that process large amounts of the same most our cluster-based computing environment. Section 4 complex code toitdeal with
implementation for processingassociated with raw data,intermediate key. Many of machines in includingfinish in de-
values andper host, the set of
crawled generating large frequentthousands a tation with order amounts of
hundreds or queries in Google large to our experiences in using as the basis
find the system easy to use: hundreds of MapReduce pro- high performance on large clusters of commodity PCs.
as the primary mechanism for fault tolerance. data such as crawled documents, web tasks arelogs, etc., toin reasonableseveral refinements of issues of how to par-
sets. Users specify a map functionrequest expressible a this model,amount of time. The the programming model
real world that processes a
scribes
as shown these issues.
grams have been implemented and upwards of one thou- Section 2 describes the basic programming model and
key/value pairvarious kinds setthe intermediate key/value
to generate a in derived data, such as invertedallelize the computation, useful. Section 5 has this complexity, we designed a new
of paper.
sand MapReduce jobs are executed on Google’s clusters The major contributions of this work are a simple and Over the past five Abstractauthors and many others at given day,several examples.we have found distribute imple- to performance
compute
years, the of that Section 3 describes ana the
As reaction
gives etc. Most such computations are conceptu- data, and handle
pairs, and a reduce function that merges written in this functional measurements of our implementation allows variety of the simple computa-
Programs all intermediate style are automati-
every day. powerful interface that enables automatic parallelization Google have implemented hundredsrepresentations of the graph structure failures conspire on Operating usually that for andus to express
of MapReduce abstraction
indices, various of special-purpose ally mentation ’04:the However, theinterface tailoredoriginal simple a Implementation
straightforward.a large cluster ofto obscureisthe towards Design compu-
values associated with and USENIX Association executed on6th Symposium inputexplores Systemsof MapReduce withinbut hides the messy de- 137
the same intermediate and OSDI
cally parallelized key. Many
MapReduce is athat of web documents, summaries of the number the pages computing to com- data
large be distributed thewe 4 de- trying to with
tation with Section 6amounts ofSection were to deal perform
tions use code
complex
and distribution of large-scale computations, combined computations programming model an associ-
process large amounts of raw data, and of computations have environment. across
our cluster-based tasks.
with an implementation of this interface that achieves real crawled per and generating in this largeThe run-time
ated such as crawled for processing are expressible large model,scribes severalthese issues. including our totails of in in using it as fault-tolerance, data distribution
world tasks host, the set of most machines. as shown
implementation documents, web request modityetc., frequent queries in asystem takes carethe order experiences
Google of in theof parallelization, the basis
logs, to hundreds or thousands of machines
refinements programming model
finish
1 Introduction high performance on large clusters of commodity PCs. data compute various theapaper.derived data, such as inverteda reasonable have data, schedulingSection 5 complexity, we designed aanew
in
sets. Users specify map function that processesof partitioning the input found time. The the pro- hasand load balancing in library. Our abstraction is in-
kinds of
details a As a reaction to this
that we amount of useful. issues of how to par- performance
Section 2 describes the basic programming model and key/value pair to generate a set of intermediatefunctional style are measurementsmachines, handling ma- forspired by the map and reduce primitives present in Lisp
indices, various representations of
gram’s execution across a set of abstraction that allows us to express the simple computa-
Programs written inthe graph structure
this key/value automati-
allelize the computation, distribute the data, anda handle of
of our implementation variety
Over the past five years, the authors and many others at gives several examples. Section 3 describes an imple- pairs, and a reduce cally parallelized of the number of large cluster of com- the tions we wereoriginalto perform many other functional languages. We realized that
function that merges executed on failures,failures conspire to required inter-machine
of web documents, summaries and all intermediate
chine a
pages
and managing and but hides
tasks. Section 6 explores thetrying simple compu-
obscure the use of MapReduce within the messy de-
Google have implemented hundreds of special-purpose mentation of the MapReduce interface tailored towards values associated host, the same intermediate key.’04: 6thin takes This of the programmerscomplex inand to most with data distribution
modity set of most frequent queries Symposium allows tails Systems Design using it as of basis
USENIX Association OSDI system communication. care on Operating of parallelization, fault-tolerance,
without any Implementation
crawled per with the machines. The run-timeMany a tation with large amounts experiences code deal the our computations involved applying a map op-
Google including our of 137
computations that process large amounts of raw data, our cluster-based computing environment. Section 4 de- real world tasks are expressible in this model, experience with parallelpro- distributed systems to eas-a library. Our each logical is in-
details of partitioning the inputshownscheduling the and
as data, these issues. a largeand load balancing in
eration to abstraction “record” in our input in order to
in the paper. gram’s execution across a set of machines, handlingof
ily utilize the resources ma- distributed system. compute a set of intermediate key/value pairs, and then
such as crawled documents, web request logs, etc., to scribes several refinements of the programming model As a reaction to spired by the mapwe designed primitives present in Lisp
this complexity, and reduce a new
compute various kinds of derived data, such as inverted that we have found useful. Section 5 has performance chine failures, and managing the required inter-machine
Programs written in this functional style are automati- and many other the simple computa-a reduce operation to all the values that shared
Our implementation of MapReduce runs on a large applying
abstraction that allows us to express functional languages. We realized that
communication. This allows programmers without any the same key, 137in order to combine the derived data ap-
indices, various representations of the graph structure measurements of our implementation for a variety of cally parallelized and executed’04:a6th Symposium com- commodity machines mostis Implementation the involved applying a map op-
USENIX Association OSDI on large cluster of on of cluster Operating Systems Design andofhighly scalable:
and
tions we were trying to performcomputations messy de-
our but hides
of web documents, summaries of the number of pages tasks. Section 6 explores the use of MapReduce within experience with parallel and distributed systems computation processes many ter- “record” in our input in orderato
modity machines. The run-time system takes care of the MapReduceto eas-
a typical eration to each logical propriately. Our use of functional model with user-
tails of parallelization, fault-tolerance, data distribution
ily utilize the resources of a abytesdistributed thousands of machines. a set of intermediate key/value pairs, reduce operations allows us to paral-
details of partitioning the input data, scheduling the pro- dataandsystem.
large of on Programmers specified map and and then
crawled per host, the set of most frequent queries in a Google including our experiences in using it as the basis load balancingcompute
in a library. Our abstraction is in-
find ma- applying a primitives present in Lisp computations easily and to use re-execution
spired a the map and reduce reduce
Our implementation of MapReduce runs on by large pro- lelize large
gram’s execution across a set of machines, handlingthe system easy to use: hundreds of MapReduceoperation to all the values that shared
as the primary mechanism for fault tolerance.
chine failures, and cluster of commodity machines and is been implemented functional languages. Weto combine the derived data ap-
managing the required inter-machine highlymany other and upwards of one order realized that
grams have
and scalable: the same key, in thou-
communication. This allows programmers without MapReduce jobs our executed on Google’s clusters a afunctional model with user- this work are a simple and
sand any
a typical MapReduce computation processes many ter-
most of
are propriately. Our use of
computations involved applying map op-
The major contributions of
USENIX Association OSDI ’04: 6th Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation 137 of machines. eration to each logical “record” in our input operations interface thatparal- automatic parallelization
specified map and reduce in order to allows us to enables
powerful
experience with parallel and data on thousandseveryeas-
abytes of distributed systems to day. Programmers
ily utilize the resources thea large distributed system. of MapReduceapro- of intermediate computations easily distributionre-execution computations, combined
find of system easy to use: hundreds lelize large key/value pairs, and and to use of large-scale
Thursday, 12 April 12 Our implementation ofhave been implementedaand upwards of one thou-
grams MapReduce runs on large
compute set and then
with an implementation of this interface that achieves
applying a reduce operation to allmechanismthat fault tolerance.
as the primary the values for shared