This document summarizes a study on traffic noise pollution in the city of Anand, India. The study found that the main sources of noise pollution are loudhailers and vehicles. However, religious noises affect the female population more than the male population. Effects of noise pollution include psychological impacts like depression and sleep disturbance, as well as physiological impacts like hearing loss. Most respondents complain to authorities to stop noise, though few contact the police. Public education campaigns are seen as the best approach to control noise pollution by respondents. Government and non-governmental organizations can play an important role in addressing this issue.

1. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE)
e-ISSN: 2278-1684,p-ISSN: 2320-334X, Volume 13, Issue 3 Ver. V (May- Jun. 2016), PP 23-28
www.iosrjournals.org
DOI: 10.9790/1684-1303052328 www.iosrjournals.org 23 | Page
Critic on Traffic Noise Pollution and its Management
Prof. C. B. Mishra1
, Paulam Desai & Ishita Ghodasara2
1
(Civil Engineering Department, BVM Engineering College, V. V. Nagar, Anand, India,
2
(Final Year Civil Engineering Students, BVM Engineering College, V. V. Nagar, Anand, India,
Abstract: In contrast to many other environmental problems, noise pollution continues to grow and is a
pollution which keeps on developing and is joined by an expanding number of objections from individuals
presented to the noise. The development in noise pollution is unsustainable in light of the fact that it includes
direct and in addition cumulative, adverse health effects. The study is completed in the inside heart of the Anand
City ( Bhalej road – Mahendra shah doctor's facility to Grid) and is an eye-opener to see and comprehend the
significance of noise pollution in the wake of its evil impact on the life of the general population. Seeing huge
development and its unfavorable impact calls attention to those principle sources of noise pollution are
loudhailer and vehicles. Be that as it may, female populace is influenced by religious noise somewhat more than
male populace. Real impacts of noise pollution incorporate psychosomatic (e.g. dejections, rest) and
physiological (deafness) issue are perceived by a more diminutive degree of respondents in young age bundles
inverse more prepared masses. In a dominant part of cases, the influenced party tenders a solicitation to stop
noise. A considerable extent of respondents among different age-bunches gripe to organization. Connecting with
the police is assessed as a device for control of noise by both male and female respondents are in more
diminutive degree of individual's inside and out illustration. Government funded training for public education
gives off an impression of being the best techniques as proposed by the respondents. Be that as it may,
government and NGOs can assume a critical part all the while.
Keywords: Noise, NGOs, populace, public education, public health
I. Introduction
With development and urbanization of our urban communities and towns, there has been a fast
increment in the movement volume on the roadways. Despite the fact that transportation is a vital part of the
advanced society, its advantages might be eclipsed by its negativities and is a reason for sympathy toward the
group. Noise pollution from road movement streams is one such negative result. Amid the previous decade, the
understanding that it is an undeniably genuine danger has picked up ever more extensive acknowledgment,
generally because of the way that noise is an exceptionally complex wonder in its physical perspective as well
as in its mental and medicinal measurements. Noise pollution is perceived as a noteworthy issue for the personal
satisfaction in urban ranges everywhere throughout the world. As a result of the expansion in the quantity of
autos and industrialization, noise pollution has additionally expanded. Noise in urban areas, particularly along
principle supply routes, has come to up irritating levels.
Confirmations showed that it might adverse affect human wellbeing. It is a sentiment disappointment,
bothering, or unsettling influence, which straightforwardly cause 'prompt impacts' including sleep, mental
fixation, and aural correspondence aggravations furthermore gives a negative impact on group or person. Report
says that long haul noise related wellbeing risks can bring about lasting listening to hearing loss among
uncovered people. Besides, introduction of abnormal state noise can bring about serious weight on sound-related
and sensory system of people. It was found that disturbance increments with the force of sound. High recurrence
noise is additionally chafing and aggravating contrasted with the low recurrence noise. A greater part of studies
has been worried with the subjective reactions to noise, given distinctive names like disturbance,
disappointment, irritation, and affectability. Living arrangements a long way from noise sources and close quiet
auxiliary Roads are as of now exceptionally famous. Individuals want to live in spot a long way from uproarious
urban zones.
Confirmations demonstrated that it might adverse affect human wellbeing. It is a sentiment dismay,
bothering, or unsettling influence, which specifically cause 'prompt impacts' including sleep, mental fixation,
and aural correspondence aggravations furthermore gives a negative impact on group or person. Report says that
long term noise related wellbeing dangers can bring about perpetual listening to hearing loss among uncovered
people. Moreover, introduction of abnormal state noise can bring about extreme weight on sound-related and
sensory system of individuals. It was found that inconvenience increments with the force of sound. High
recurrence noise is all the more aggravating and irritating contrasted with the low recurrence noise. A greater
part of studies has been worried with the subjective reactions to noise, given distinctive names like
inconvenience, disappointment, aggravation, and sensitivity. Living arrangements a long way from noise
sources and close noiseless optional roads are as of now extremely well known. Individuals like to live in spot a

2. Critic on Traffic Noise Pollution and its Management
DOI: 10.9790/1684-1303052328 www.iosrjournals.org 24 | Page
long way from noisy urban regions. The aggregate number of vehicles in India has developed from 0.3 million
in 1951 which achieves almost 172 million in March 2013 of which more than 21½ million were autos, taxis
and jeeps.
The noise pollution is not a one of a kind issue for developing nations like India as it were. In China,
till third century B.C., rather than hanging men for dangerous crimes, noise was utilized for their torturing. The
troubling impacts of noise are sufficiently risky that noise issue is considered next to crime by specific nations.
An overview by Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) review demonstrates that in Delhi, the noise
level in many spots surpasses as far as possible. (The Times of India, New Delhi). So also, a study by NEERI
has uncovered that noise levels in private, business and modern territories and quiet zones of Delhi and towns of
National Capital Region (NCR) far surpass the recommended levels. The normal noise level in Delhi is 80 dB
while as far as possible is 5dB (The Business Line, New Delhi). Bombay too experiences abnormal amounts of
noise. Obviously, noise has accepted disturbing extents influencing antagonistically the proficiency of different
populaces, psychological wellness and general personal satisfaction. Additionally, it is turning into an issue of
peace with the developing number of grievances to police and organization. Unless and until, measures are
taken to control the level of noise, the progressing urbanization and industrialization might muddle the issue so
much that it gets to be hopeless. In India, the noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000 have been
surrounded under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. These are an arrangement of rules for regulation and
control of noise.
II. Mission
The basic goals of these studies is to distinguish diverse sources of noise pollution, its unfriendly effect
and investigating conceivable responses in view of reaction overview and finding the suitable answers for noise
abatement can be utilized for creating proper legitimate and public activity program.
III. Research Techniques
This observational study depends on a sample study of the Anand city which is situated in middle of
the Charotar district known for its productive improvement and has territory of around 38.58 sq.km having
populace of 1,98,282 according to 2011 evaluation. The review is led in the center heart of the city ( Bhalej road
– Mahendra shah hospital to Grid) seeing tremendous movement and its unfavorable effect. The Anand is
decided for the study as the city demonstrates a concentric type of spatial structure which is outspread and
separated by direct transportation halls with advancement concentrated along it and all however all the business
exercises are situated in the northern and western part, the city center still goes about as a core. Because of the
advancement of new CBD towards the northern side, this region has indicated quick development. Other sub
habitats for development incorporate business sector yard and the agro based commercial enterprises in southern
side along the development has quickly occurred. The situating of this sub focuses profoundly affects the private
versatility in the city. All out 144 respondents was met by and by. The sample represents to a cross-area of
various age groups, sex, geographic, instructive levels; pay levels of respondents and in this way it could be
dealt with as an agent test for such an exploratory study. The information was gathered by utilizing an organized
questionnaire mixed with suitable open-finished inquiries. The investigation has been done with the assistance
of percentages and cross-orders on sources of noise, impacts of noise, responses to noise, and recommendations
to control noise as far as age and additionally sex.
IV. Results
The transportation noise is one of the significant sources of noise introduction in proximities and
causes generous inconvenience and can be isolated into two parts. The noise first is created by the motor fumes
framework and transmission, and is the predominant source when movement is not unreservedly flowing,
especially from overwhelming vehicles which contribute a huge extent of low recurrence noise. Noise levels
will differ essentially as per motor speed as opposed to vehicle speed. In urban ranges, quick speeding up and
re-beginning the motor in movement could bring about outflows up to 15dB higher than the ordinary levels of
emanation coming about because of smooth driving. The second noise source segment is created from the
connection of tires with the road surface and is the overwhelming noise source under free stream movement
conditions at moderate to more ethical route speeds and contributes a noteworthy extent of high recurrence
noise. Noise levels will differ contingent upon vehicle speed, the road surface and whether the surface is wet or
dry. The contact in the middle of tires and the road surface is overwhelming wellspring of noise at rates above
60km/h for light vehicle.
Another real wellspring of noise is open location framework utilized by temples, mosques and so forth.
Indian Constitution under Article 25-28 ensures opportunity of religion to all persons. Be that as it may, this
opportunity of religion is not a flat out one. Flexibility of religion is liable to open request, wellbeing and ethical

3. Critic on Traffic Noise Pollution and its Management
DOI: 10.9790/1684-1303052328 www.iosrjournals.org 25 | Page
quality. In a late choice, Supreme Court held that no religion recommends that the petitions to God ought to be
performed by beating so as to utilize amplifier or drums.
Proximity noise happens when individuals who make or permit noise to meddle with a neighbor are not
interrupted in the privileges of others. These are individuals from a self-assuredness society, likewise a few
people immovably trust that they are qualified for make as much noise however they see fit relishes the
considered irritating proximity, if one protestations psychotics conduct might be seen at times.
The investigation (Table 1) shows that huge extents of respondents in every age gathering are being
influenced by noise exuding from the amplifiers. The extent is 86% to 100% with general %age of 93%.
Notwithstanding, % of such individuals in age gathering of 20-40 years is imperceptibly lower. Comparable is
the circumstance with vehicles. Greater part of respondents crosswise over various ages bunches feel that
automobile noise influences their exercises. A moderately little extent of respondents (half crosswise over
different age bunches) recognizes antagonistic impact of noise produced by proximities. The general %age of
respondents claim that Noise starting from religious capacities influences them. When all is said, aside from the
amplifiers and vehicles, religious capacities, also proximity goes about as huge sources of noise. In this way,
urban areas are turning into a casualty of new class of noise. In general, apart from the loudhailer and vehicles,
holy occasion, as well proximity acts as significant sources of noise pollution. Thus, cities are becoming a
victim of new class of pollution i.e. noise. Further, we examine whether sources of noise pollution act upon
male population and female population differently.
Table 1 also presents figures and % time of male and female respondents influenced by various sources
of noise. There are checked contrasts in populace influenced by noise from religious capacity, proximity,
vehicles and shockingly, ladies are more influenced by it over the men populace. Regarding remaining source
i.e. amplifier there is checked distinction in somewhat more % of male populace contrasted with female
populace.
Effects of Noise:
Road activity noise can influence wellbeing both straight forwardly and by implication. Direct
wellbeing impacts have been found to incorporate listening to hearing loss and cardiovascular impacts, while
aberrant wellbeing impacts, including directing or intervening elements, incorporate inconvenience and sleep
aggravation. Noise incited listening to hearing loss, normally happening when noise exposures surpassing
75decibels for over eight hours day by day for a drawn out stretch of time, is a far-fetched result given common
place road movement Noise levels. The sound created by a blasting saltine, surpassing 150dB, can bring about a
ringing sensation called "tinnitus" and can debilitate listening to forever. Be that as it may, relationship between
cardiovascular infection, (e.g., hypertension or ischemia) and introduction to Road activity Noise have been
accounted for, however can't be ascribed exclusively to direct impacts as circuitous impacts can likewise prompt
negative cardiovascular results. Roundabout impacts, for example, sleep disturbance and inconvenience are all
the more regularly the center of Noise wellbeing examine, and are frequently utilized as result variables as a part
of measurement reaction research. There is a lot of logical writing surveying the impacts of noise on individuals.
Tripathi and Tiwari[10] reported state of mind of activity personals toward transportation Noise in a
study in Ahmedabad (2006). No activity noise checking was accounted for this study. The poll included
inquiries with respect to the self assessment of the policemen about their listening to capacity, over a significant
time span introduction to uproarious sound, and the utilization of personal defensive gadgets, for example,
earplugs and ear covers. from those reviewed, 11.6% griped of customary tinnitus, while 62.8% had work
related tinnitus and experienced it urging working hours as it were. It was accounted for that self assessed
subjects.
Banerjee et al.[2] led a study to assess Road activity noise sway on the proximity group of Asansol city
(2008). Relationship between movement noise levels and disturbance was contemplated utilizing connection,
straight, and different direct relapse examinations. It was watched that the mean estimation of percent of
populace very irritated (%HA) because of Road activity noise was 26.50 ± 3.37 (19.44–33.2), while the MDS
was 2.96 ± 0.90 (1.04–4.45). It was watched that noise record based models gave better disturbance expectations
in contrast with vehicular info based models. The main two direct effects that they were to identify with activity
noise pollution were discourse impedance amid the day and sleep unsettling influence amid night.
Nandanwar et al.[4] concentrated on the impact of movement noise on the personal satisfaction among
occupants around the significant Road convergences in Nagpur city (2009). Lion's share of the subjects
communicated disturbance because of movement noise amid day by day exercises, and of these 29% were to a
great degree, 24% all that much, 22% to some degree, and 19% minimal irritated. 33% of subjects reported
more irritation amid night than daytime. No exposure–effect bend was accounted for this study. Most
distinguished causes because of activity noise were cerebral pain, anxiety, and listening to issues. The creators
presumed that both pay and training decidedly influenced the apparent effect of movement noised on wellbeing
related variables.

4. Critic on Traffic Noise Pollution and its Management
DOI: 10.9790/1684-1303052328 www.iosrjournals.org 26 | Page
Goswami et al.[3] examined movement noise levels along a street interfacing two college grounds in
Balasore city (2011). It was accounted for that the wellspring of noise along the study territory was
dominatingly because of vehicular movement with overwhelming vehicles being the significant emitters. The
overview distinguished that most of the subjects, including drivers, communicated their disappointment over the
expanding force of noise in the territory. The study reports that cerebral pain, awful temper, listening to issue,
and loss of fixation were a portion of the critical impacts because of high noise levels. Around 86% of
understudies reported that their study was aggravated by regular air horns and 21% had rest disturbance evening
time activity noise.
Patil et al.[6] reported subjective investigation on movement noise and the personal satisfaction among
inhabitants around the major arterials Roads in Amravati city (2011). It was accounted for that dominant part of
the subjects knew about the impedance of movement noise with every day exercises and effect on wellbeing. It
was watched that 16.8% were amazingly and 21.1% were all that much irritated because of vehicle noise.
Reported most extreme irritation (47%) was most noteworthy amid the noontime and evening, while half of
subjects reported cerebral pain, anxiety, and listening to challenges due from presentation to noise.
We can picture (Table 2) that noise meddles with correspondence, bothers the sleep and lessens the
proficiency of people under its umbrella. Greater part of test respondents presented to noise pollution report
event of disturbance and listening to issue. The review information demonstrates that the impact of noise is not
comparative among different age bunches. For the most part, developing age bears the blazed of unreasonable
noise pollution. For instance, the rising extent of test respondents in higher age bunches recognizes
discouragement, sleeplessness and stunning impact. A substantial extent of respondents feels that noise meddles
with between individual correspondences and causes disturbance. Compelling impacts (i.e. mental breakdown
and deafness) are recognized by 33% of study populace. In any case, there is a much higher rate of deafness
impacts on old individuals (above 60 years old). Further, a general examination of table demonstrates that
psychosomatic (e.g. depressions, sleep) and physiological (deafness) issue are recognized by a littler extent of
respondents in youthful age bunches opposite more seasoned populaces.
Table 2 also demonstrates that impression of male and female populaces about the impact of noise
changes. An altogether higher extent of female populace feels the unfriendly impacts of noise on hearing,
productivity, and rearing of disturbance. Additionally as far as physiological (wretchedness, sleep, mental
breakdown) and obstruction with correspondence are more felt by females.
An attempt is made for examining the information on responses of age-gatherings (Table 3) with a
perspective to find out the distinctions in gatherings, if any. Famous responses crosswise over different age-
bunches incorporate 'solicitation the culprit to stop/decrease the noise'. A noteworthy extent of individuals
influenced by noise look for redressal through authoritative technique or squabble the last is main stream with
gatherings of adolescents up to 20 years. Response to noise for its control falling in 40-60 years does not enjoy
managerial, legitimate cures and/or quarreling. Indeed, even as far as asking for the source, they slack other age
bunch. In spite of the fact, that a little rate, the plan of action to lawful cure (police) likely demonstrates genuine
infringement of noise controlling laws or group morals.
Table 3 also demonstrates that there is a distinction in extents of male and female populaces with
respect to the arrangement of likely responses toward intemperate noise. It might be an after effect of present
day instruction, sustaining, and a changing idea of womanhood. Real responses to abundance noise in regards to
source and whine to powers female are exceedingly dynamic while male are more disposed towards squabble
and have faith in griping to the police.
V. TABLES
A TABLE : 1 Sources of noise on different age groups with effects on respondents
up to 20 20-40 40-60 >60 Total Total Male Total Female
loudhailer 25(96%) 50(86%) 44(100%) 15(94%) 134(93%) 93(98%) 41(84%)
Vehicles 15(58%) 34(59%) 21(48%) 11(69%) 81(56%) 41(43%) 40(82%)
Holy occasion 14(54%) 33(57%) 38(86%) 12(75%) 97(67%) 54(57%) 43(88%)
proximity 10(39%) 28(48%) 20(45%) 8(50%) 66(46%) 30(32%) 36(73%)
B TABLE: 2 Impact of noise on different age groups with impressions on male & female.
Impact on Listening 7(27%) 9(16%) 8(18%) 7(44%) 31(22%) 12(13%) 19(39%)
Intervention with conversation 23(88%) 42(72%) 44(100%) 14(88%) 123(85%) 81(85%) 42(86%)
Agent of irritation 19(73%) 30(52%) 16(36%) 8(50%) 73(51%) 36(38%) 37(76%)
Interrupts sleep 13(50%) 22(38%) 27(61%) 10(63%) 72(50%) 43(45%) 29(59%)
Leads to hearing loss 4(15%) 1(2%) 2(5%) 1(6%) 8(6%) 3(3%) 5(10%)
C TABLE: 3 Reactions to noise by different age groups and among sex groups too.
Demand the location 9(35%) 33(57%) 6(14%) 2(13%) 50(35%) 29(31%) 21(43%)
Grievances to authority 16(62%) 31(53%) 13(30%) 6(38%) 66(46%) 38(40%) 28(57%)
Grievances to cop 12(46%) 22(38%) 15(34%) 7(44%) 56(39%) 41(43%) 15(31%)
Argument with person 10(38%) 14(24%) 13(30%) 7(44%) 44(31%) 38(40%) 6(12%)

5. Critic on Traffic Noise Pollution and its Management
DOI: 10.9790/1684-1303052328 www.iosrjournals.org 27 | Page
G TABLE : 4 Suggestions by different age groups to control noise pollution and different sex groups
Tutelage 23(88%) 42(72%) 43(98%) 13(81%) 121(84%) 85(89%) 36(73%)
Including NGOs 17(65%) 31(53%) 40(91%) 10(63%) 98(68%) 65(68%) 33(67%)
Government attempts 20(77%) 33(57%) 39(89%) 69%) 103(72%) 62(65%) 41(84%)
Authorizing cop 20(77%) 24(41%) 38(86%) 10(63%) 92(64%) 61(64%) 31(63%)
Total 26(100%) 58(100%) 44(100%) 16(100%) 144(100%) 95(100%) 49(100%)
VI. Commendations For Managing Noise
The figures in Table 4 demonstrate reactions of people to an arrangement of plausible arrangements.
By and large, an arrangement of a huge extent of respondents feel that state funded training projects and
government can offer us some assistance with controlling the noise level. The police and common organization,
could likewise encourage checking of noise levels. Be that as it may, the information proposes requirement for a
multi-dimensional methodology i.e. a solitary measure can't accomplish the objective of noise diminishment. As
far as age, noteworthy extent persons between 40-60 years feel that common powers ought to be engaged
alongside different measures. It fortifies the conviction that states funded instruction is required critically in
light of the fact that individuals don't know about enactment/guidelines of environment service. The more
youthful (< 20 years) era seems to stress bury alia, requirement for enabling the police. Each of age gatherings
feels that a mix model could work better for an open cause.
Given the considerable exposures to noise, the seriousness of related well being results, and the
constrained force of general society to secure them, there is a reasonable requirement for arrangement went for
lessening noise exposures. Since noise is required to ascend with expanding urbanization, approach pioneers
need to investigate the utilization of law as a useful device to oversee and decrease noise exposures. Here we
highlight the intercessions we trust hold the most guarantees for strategy pioneers. We first clarify how noise
can be incorporated into the elected general wellbeing motivation and after that investigate the ways state and
proximity governments might utilize the law to react to and diminish noise.
Male and female gatherings don't appear to contrast in regards to option strategies for controlling the
noise level. Transcendently, male respondents advocate state funded training while as female respondents needs
that administration endeavors are expected to decrease noise. Engaging the police is appraised as an apparatus
for control of noise by both male and female respondents are in littler extent of individual’s altogether example.
Hence, change out in the open disposition by projects of government/NGO and common measures (fines and so
forth.) could offer us some assistance with reducing or keep the noise pollution muscle initio.
VII. Conclusion
This exploration paper investigates the sources, impacts, responses and proposals for controlling the
inordinate noise. Vehicles and open location framework (loudhailer) ends up being real sources of noise
pollution. It shows up those loudhailers are oftentimes utilized for heavenly event (and sanctuary supplications
to God). Unsettling influence by loudhailer and vehicles is felt by age gatherings of 20-40 years to some degree
lesser than different gatherings. Crosswise over different age bunches, there is right around an equivalent extents
of respondent reporting nearness, music and religions capacities as sources of noise. There are no varieties
among male and female populace. Extent of female populace versus extent of guys' populace is same for each of
sources of noise. The overview shows that noise influences people in a few ways. It results in uncalled for
correspondence, restlessness and decreased proficiency. Despite the fact that the psycho-physical impacts
(disturbance and gloom) are additionally normal yet the compelling influences e.g. deafness and mental
breakdown are not precluded. In a lion's share of cases, the influenced party tenders a solicitation to stop noise.
A considerable extent of respondents among different age-bunches grumble to organization. Interestingly,
around 33% of youngsters (beneath 20 yrs) like to fight with the blundering party. Government funded
instruction seems, by all accounts, to be the best techniques as proposed by the respondents.
Be that as it may, it is likewise recommended that perfection in vehicle innovation, traffic
administration methods, barriers and appropriate introduction of housing and legitimate town planning is
required for viable increase in noise decrease. Dynamic crusade by concerned road and traffic engineer,
environmental pollution administrator, architect and town organizer ought to be effectively connected with
against noise and specifically know about the conceivable outcomes offered by different strategies.
References
[1] Ahamad. J, Abbas.A and Reem.S, ―Evaluation of Traffic Noise Pollution‖, J. of Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 120,
499-525, 2006.
[2] Banerjee D, Chakraborty SK, Bhattacharyya S, Gangopadhyay A. Attitudinal response towards road traffic noise in the industrial
town ofAsansol, India. Environ Monit Assess 2008;151:37‑44.
[3] Goswami S, Nayak SK, Pradhan AC, Dey SK. ---- A study on traffic noise of two campuses of University, Balasore, India. J
Environ Biol2011;32:105‑9

6. Critic on Traffic Noise Pollution and its Management
DOI: 10.9790/1684-1303052328 www.iosrjournals.org 28 | Page
[4] Nandanwar DR, Parbat DK, Deshmukh SK. ---- Study on resident’s perception and attitudes towards urban traffic noise in Nagpur
city. 2nd International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering andTechnology. Nagpur: ICETET; 2009. p. 585‑ 8.
[5] Panadya, G. H, ---- Assessment of traffic noise and its impact on community International Journal of Environmental Studies, 60(6),
595-602, 2003.
[6] Patil CR, Modak JP, Choudhari PV, Dhote DS. ---- Subjective analysis of road traffic noise annoyance around major arterials in
intermediate city. Eur J Appl Sci 2011; 3:58‑61.
[7] Pucher .J, Korattyswaropam. N, Mittal. N, Ittyerah. N, ---- Urban transport crisis in India. Transp. Policy. 12(3): 185-198, 2005.
[8] Quis D, ---- Annoyance from road traffic noise: a review. J. Environ. Psychol. 21: 101-120, 2001.
[9] Singh, N., & Daver, S. C (2004), ---- Noise pollution—sources, effects and control. Journal of Human Ecology (Delhi, India), 16
(3), 181-187.
[10] Tripathi SR, Tiwari RR. ---- Self‑reported hearing quality of traffic policemen: A questionnaire‑based study. Indian J Occup
Environ Med 2006; 10:82‑4.