Critical Analysis Rubric.docx
•Download as DOCX, PDF•
0 likes•159 views
This rubric outlines the criteria for critically analyzing a work and provides percentages for each section. An above-average analysis will have an engaging introduction with a clear thesis, accurately summarize the main ideas of the original work, use specific examples and evidence to substantively analyze significant aspects, and conclude by restating the thesis and analysis. It will also be well-written and formatted according to MLA style. Average analyses may lack engagement or substantiation, include extraneous details, and have vague conclusions. Below-average work will misrepresent the original or fail to engage with it at all.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Marxist criticism presentation
Here is my second uploaded presentation, Marxist Approach in literary criticism. There are instructions herein. Should you need the activities, please contact me via my email address: fgbulusan_gmail@yahoo.com or my pm me via my FB account. I am always willing to lecture about this topic. Contact me via my cellular number 0935-918-3854. Thanks!
Semi-Detailed Lesson Plan - Gerunds (Junior High School - English 9)
A Semi-Detailed Lesson Plan about Gerunds in the English Subject. I'm now a professional teacher and this lesson plan was used during my teaching demonstration in Sicayab National High School.
Unit 1 introduction to Literary Theory & Criticism
Int. to Literary Theory & Literary Criticism
Compiled By Belachew W/Gebriel (bellachew@gmail.com)
Jimma University
CSSH
Department of English Language and Literature
Recommended
Marxist criticism presentation
Here is my second uploaded presentation, Marxist Approach in literary criticism. There are instructions herein. Should you need the activities, please contact me via my email address: fgbulusan_gmail@yahoo.com or my pm me via my FB account. I am always willing to lecture about this topic. Contact me via my cellular number 0935-918-3854. Thanks!
Semi-Detailed Lesson Plan - Gerunds (Junior High School - English 9)
A Semi-Detailed Lesson Plan about Gerunds in the English Subject. I'm now a professional teacher and this lesson plan was used during my teaching demonstration in Sicayab National High School.
Unit 1 introduction to Literary Theory & Criticism
Int. to Literary Theory & Literary Criticism
Compiled By Belachew W/Gebriel (bellachew@gmail.com)
Jimma University
CSSH
Department of English Language and Literature
ENG-106 Rubric Proposal EssayCriteria Value1 Unsatisfacto.docx
ENG-106 Rubric: Proposal Essay
Criteria
% Value
1: Unsatisfactory
2: Less Than Satisfactory
3: Satisfactory
4: Good
5: Excellent
% Scaling
0%
65%
75%
85%
100%
Content & Ideas – 40%
Proposal
Content and Ideas Should:
Include an effective title.
Use a thesis that centers on a proposal argument.
Give a problem presence.
Develop the proposal argument by using claim-type strategies that support proposals (categorical, ethical, and/or cause and effect claims).
Present specific evidence to supplement supporting arguments.
40%
Does not have title, and has missing or indiscernible thesis statement and minimal evidence to support main ideas. The writer gives the problem no presence. Argument includes elements of a proposal, but the argument does not center on the proposal. The writer does not use strategies that support proposal arguments.
Title may not suggest subject and does not spark interest. Thesis statement and/or the controlling idea are not clearly stated. The writer gives the problem little presence. Argument includes elements of proposals, but the argument does not center on a proposal and/or the writer does not use strategies that support proposal arguments very well. Ideas are underdeveloped and clichéd. They do not support the thesis. Evidence from outside sources can be irrelevant.
Title suggests subject but does not spark interest. Thesis statement identifies the main point the author is trying to make. The writer gives the problem some presence, though the problem could be explained more forcefully. Most of content relates to thesis statement, but lacks sufficient support through appropriate strategies for making proposal arguments (categorical, ethical, and/or cause and effect claims). Argument may not center specifically on a proposal. Cited evidence sometimes does not justify ideas.
Title suggests subject but does not necessarily spark interest. Thesis statement clearly identifies the main point the author is trying to make. The writer gives the problem presence. Argument centers specifically on a proposal and uses strategies that support it (categorical, ethical, and/or cause and effect claims). Most of the content supports thesis, and cited evidence usually justifies ideas.
Title suggests subject and sparks interest. With a clear, controlling idea, thesis statement effectively identifies the main proposal the student is trying to make. The student gives the problem full presence. Content supports thesis well by effectively using strategies that support proposals as necessary (categorical, ethical, and/or cause and effect claims). Specific, cited evidence justifies ideas and enriches the essay.
Organization – 12%
Organization
12%
No apparent organization present. The piece does not explain that a problem exists, provide a solution, and/or justify the solution. Ineffective introduction does not invite readers or explain the subject. The reader cannot find the thesis statement. Underdeveloped paragraphs lack focus and topic sent ...
ENG-106 Rubric Cause and Effect Argument Criteria Value1 .docx
ENG-106 Rubric: Cause and Effect Argument
Criteria
% Value
1: Unsatisfactory
2: Less Than Satisfactory
3: Satisfactory
4: Good
5: Excellent
% Scaling
0%
65%
75%
85%
100%
Content & Ideas – 40%
Cause and Effect Content and Ideas Should:
Include an effective title.
Present a thesis that centers specifically on a problem of cause and effect.
Use cause and effect chains and inductive reasoning to support the cause and effect argument established in the thesis.
Cite evidence that supports the cause and effect chains and inductive reasoning.
40%
Does not have title, and has missing or indiscernible thesis statement and minimal evidence to support main ideas. Argument includes elements of cause/effect, but the argument does not center on causes or consequences. The student does not use strategies that support cause and effect arguments.
Title may not suggest subject and does not spark interest. Thesis statement and/or the controlling idea are not clearly stated. Argument includes elements of cause/effect, but the argument does not center on causes or consequences and/or the writer does not use strategies that support cause and effect arguments very well. Ideas are underdeveloped and clichéd. They do not support the thesis. Evidence from outside sources can be irrelevant.
Title suggests subject but does not spark interest. Thesis statement identifies the main point the author is trying to make. Most of content relates to thesis statement, but lacks sufficient support through appropriate strategies. Argument may not center specifically on cause/effect or use strategies that support cause and effect arguments effectively. Cited evidence sometimes does not justify ideas.
Title suggests subject but does not necessarily spark interest. Thesis statement clearly identifies the main point the author is trying to make. Argument centers specifically on cause/effect and uses strategies that support cause and effect arguments (cause and effect chains and inductive reasoning). Most of the content supports thesis, and cited evidence usually justifies ideas.
Title suggests subject and sparks interest. With a clear, controlling idea, thesis statement effectively identifies the main point the student is trying to make. Content supports thesis well. Argument centers specifically on cause/effect and effectively uses strategies that support cause and effect arguments (cause and effect chains and inductive reasoning). Specific, cited evidence justifies ideas and enriches the essay.
Organization – 12%
Organization
12%
No apparent organization present. Ineffective introduction does not invite readers or explain the subject. The reader cannot find the thesis statement. Underdeveloped paragraphs lack focus and topic sentences. No conclusion present.
No apparent organization present. Introduction explains subject, but does not engage readers. Thesis is difficult to find. Underdeveloped paragraphs lack focus and topic sentences. Weak conclusion offered.
Organization is cl ...
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Similar to Critical Analysis Rubric.docx
ENG-106 Rubric Proposal EssayCriteria Value1 Unsatisfacto.docx
ENG-106 Rubric: Proposal Essay
Criteria
% Value
1: Unsatisfactory
2: Less Than Satisfactory
3: Satisfactory
4: Good
5: Excellent
% Scaling
0%
65%
75%
85%
100%
Content & Ideas – 40%
Proposal
Content and Ideas Should:
Include an effective title.
Use a thesis that centers on a proposal argument.
Give a problem presence.
Develop the proposal argument by using claim-type strategies that support proposals (categorical, ethical, and/or cause and effect claims).
Present specific evidence to supplement supporting arguments.
40%
Does not have title, and has missing or indiscernible thesis statement and minimal evidence to support main ideas. The writer gives the problem no presence. Argument includes elements of a proposal, but the argument does not center on the proposal. The writer does not use strategies that support proposal arguments.
Title may not suggest subject and does not spark interest. Thesis statement and/or the controlling idea are not clearly stated. The writer gives the problem little presence. Argument includes elements of proposals, but the argument does not center on a proposal and/or the writer does not use strategies that support proposal arguments very well. Ideas are underdeveloped and clichéd. They do not support the thesis. Evidence from outside sources can be irrelevant.
Title suggests subject but does not spark interest. Thesis statement identifies the main point the author is trying to make. The writer gives the problem some presence, though the problem could be explained more forcefully. Most of content relates to thesis statement, but lacks sufficient support through appropriate strategies for making proposal arguments (categorical, ethical, and/or cause and effect claims). Argument may not center specifically on a proposal. Cited evidence sometimes does not justify ideas.
Title suggests subject but does not necessarily spark interest. Thesis statement clearly identifies the main point the author is trying to make. The writer gives the problem presence. Argument centers specifically on a proposal and uses strategies that support it (categorical, ethical, and/or cause and effect claims). Most of the content supports thesis, and cited evidence usually justifies ideas.
Title suggests subject and sparks interest. With a clear, controlling idea, thesis statement effectively identifies the main proposal the student is trying to make. The student gives the problem full presence. Content supports thesis well by effectively using strategies that support proposals as necessary (categorical, ethical, and/or cause and effect claims). Specific, cited evidence justifies ideas and enriches the essay.
Organization – 12%
Organization
12%
No apparent organization present. The piece does not explain that a problem exists, provide a solution, and/or justify the solution. Ineffective introduction does not invite readers or explain the subject. The reader cannot find the thesis statement. Underdeveloped paragraphs lack focus and topic sent ...
ENG-106 Rubric Cause and Effect Argument Criteria Value1 .docx
ENG-106 Rubric: Cause and Effect Argument
Criteria
% Value
1: Unsatisfactory
2: Less Than Satisfactory
3: Satisfactory
4: Good
5: Excellent
% Scaling
0%
65%
75%
85%
100%
Content & Ideas – 40%
Cause and Effect Content and Ideas Should:
Include an effective title.
Present a thesis that centers specifically on a problem of cause and effect.
Use cause and effect chains and inductive reasoning to support the cause and effect argument established in the thesis.
Cite evidence that supports the cause and effect chains and inductive reasoning.
40%
Does not have title, and has missing or indiscernible thesis statement and minimal evidence to support main ideas. Argument includes elements of cause/effect, but the argument does not center on causes or consequences. The student does not use strategies that support cause and effect arguments.
Title may not suggest subject and does not spark interest. Thesis statement and/or the controlling idea are not clearly stated. Argument includes elements of cause/effect, but the argument does not center on causes or consequences and/or the writer does not use strategies that support cause and effect arguments very well. Ideas are underdeveloped and clichéd. They do not support the thesis. Evidence from outside sources can be irrelevant.
Title suggests subject but does not spark interest. Thesis statement identifies the main point the author is trying to make. Most of content relates to thesis statement, but lacks sufficient support through appropriate strategies. Argument may not center specifically on cause/effect or use strategies that support cause and effect arguments effectively. Cited evidence sometimes does not justify ideas.
Title suggests subject but does not necessarily spark interest. Thesis statement clearly identifies the main point the author is trying to make. Argument centers specifically on cause/effect and uses strategies that support cause and effect arguments (cause and effect chains and inductive reasoning). Most of the content supports thesis, and cited evidence usually justifies ideas.
Title suggests subject and sparks interest. With a clear, controlling idea, thesis statement effectively identifies the main point the student is trying to make. Content supports thesis well. Argument centers specifically on cause/effect and effectively uses strategies that support cause and effect arguments (cause and effect chains and inductive reasoning). Specific, cited evidence justifies ideas and enriches the essay.
Organization – 12%
Organization
12%
No apparent organization present. Ineffective introduction does not invite readers or explain the subject. The reader cannot find the thesis statement. Underdeveloped paragraphs lack focus and topic sentences. No conclusion present.
No apparent organization present. Introduction explains subject, but does not engage readers. Thesis is difficult to find. Underdeveloped paragraphs lack focus and topic sentences. Weak conclusion offered.
Organization is cl ...
ENG-106 Rubric Definition Argument Criteria Value1 Unsati.docx
ENG-106 Rubric: Definition Argument
Criteria
% Value
1: Unsatisfactory
2: Less Than Satisfactory
3: Satisfactory
4: Good
5: Excellent
% Scaling
0%
65%
75%
85%
100%
Content & Ideas – 40%
Definition Argument Content and Ideas Should:
Include an effective title.
Provide a thesis that centers specifically on an argument of definition.
Establish clear criteria related to the definition in question.
Match one or more cases to the established criteria.
Use evidence appropriate for definitional arguments.
40%
Does not have title, and has missing or indiscernible thesis statement and minimal evidence to support main ideas. Argument includes elements of reasoning by definition, but does not center on a definition argument. Student does not use outside sources.
Title may not suggest subject and does not spark interest. Thesis statement and/or the controlling idea are not clearly stated. Argument includes elements of a definitional argument, but does not use strategies (especially the criteria-match structure) very well. Ideas are underdeveloped and clichéd. They do not support the thesis. Evidence from outside sources can be irrelevant.
Title suggests subject but does not spark interest. Thesis statement identifies the main point the author is trying to make. Most of content relates to thesis statement, but lacks sufficient support through appropriate strategies. Argument centers specifically on a definitional argument, but may not effectively uses strategies that support it, including matching criteria for definition arguments Cited evidence sometimes does not justify ideas.
Title suggests subject but does not necessarily spark interest. Thesis statement clearly identifies the main point the author is trying to make. Argument centers specifically on a definitional argument and uses strategies that support it, including matching criteria for definition arguments. Most of the content supports thesis, and cited evidence usually justifies ideas.
Title suggests subject and sparks interest. With a clear, controlling idea, thesis statement effectively identifies the main point the student is trying to make. Content supports thesis well. Argument centers specifically on a definitional argument and effectively uses strategies that support it, including matching criteria for definition arguments Specific, cited evidence justifies ideas and enriches the essay.
Organization – 12%
Organization
12%
No apparent organization present. Ineffective introduction does not invite readers or explain the subject. The reader cannot find the thesis statement. Underdeveloped paragraphs lack focus and topic sentences. No conclusion present.
No apparent organization present. Introduction explains subject, but does not engage readers. Thesis is difficult to find. Underdeveloped paragraphs lack focus and topic sentences. Weak conclusion offered.
Organization is clear, but with minor errors. Introduction explains subject, but does not adequately engage readers. Thesis may be m ...
ENG-106 Rubric Definition Argument Criteria Value1 Unsati
ENG-106 Rubric: Definition Argument
Criteria
% Value
1: Unsatisfactory
2: Less Than Satisfactory
3: Satisfactory
4: Good
5: Excellent
% Scaling
0%
65%
75%
85%
100%
Content & Ideas – 40%
Definition Argument Content and Ideas Should:
Include an effective title.
Provide a thesis that centers specifically on an argument of definition.
Establish clear criteria related to the definition in question.
Match one or more cases to the established criteria.
Use evidence appropriate for definitional arguments.
40%
Does not have title, and has missing or indiscernible thesis statement and minimal evidence to support main ideas. Argument includes elements of reasoning by definition, but does not center on a definition argument. Student does not use outside sources.
Title may not suggest subject and does not spark interest. Thesis statement and/or the controlling idea are not clearly stated. Argument includes elements of a definitional argument, but does not use strategies (especially the criteria-match structure) very well. Ideas are underdeveloped and clichéd. They do not support the thesis. Evidence from outside sources can be irrelevant.
Title suggests subject but does not spark interest. Thesis statement identifies the main point the author is trying to make. Most of content relates to thesis statement, but lacks sufficient support through appropriate strategies. Argument centers specifically on a definitional argument, but may not effectively uses strategies that support it, including matching criteria for definition arguments Cited evidence sometimes does not justify ideas.
Title suggests subject but does not necessarily spark interest. Thesis statement clearly identifies the main point the author is trying to make. Argument centers specifically on a definitional argument and uses strategies that support it, including matching criteria for definition arguments. Most of the content supports thesis, and cited evidence usually justifies ideas.
Title suggests subject and sparks interest. With a clear, controlling idea, thesis statement effectively identifies the main point the student is trying to make. Content supports thesis well. Argument centers specifically on a definitional argument and effectively uses strategies that support it, including matching criteria for definition arguments Specific, cited evidence justifies ideas and enriches the essay.
Organization – 12%
Organization
12%
No apparent organization present. Ineffective introduction does not invite readers or explain the subject. The reader cannot find the thesis statement. Underdeveloped paragraphs lack focus and topic sentences. No conclusion present.
No apparent organization present. Introduction explains subject, but does not engage readers. Thesis is difficult to find. Underdeveloped paragraphs lack focus and topic sentences. Weak conclusion offered.
Organization is clear, but with minor errors. Introduction explains subject, but does not adequately engage readers. Thesis may be m ...
EXPOSITORY ESSAY WITH ANALYSIS RUBRICGRADEIntro Paragraph .docx
EXPOSITORY ESSAY WITH ANALYSIS RUBRIC
GRADE
Intro Paragraph / Thesis
Body Paragraphs / Organization
Literary Analysis
Language Style / Voice
Mechanics
A
(excellent)
Engaging opening introduces the essay’s general topic and inspires thinking about that topic; logically proceeds to thesis; thesis is an easily identifiable, well-phrased argument that assesses the text and addresses three specific ideas to be analyzed and proven in the essay; the ideas offered in the thesis reflect sound critical, analytical thinking about a piece of literature.
Each topic sentence clearly connects to the thesis and offers an identifiable, well-phrased idea to be proven in the paragraph; quotations are well-chosen and explained. Paragraphs are well-organized to create a coherent, carefully developed and supported argument; transitions between ideas are logical and each idea builds on the preceding one. The writer maintains focus and control of the argument so that the point of each paragraph is clear.
Writing reflects a critical, analytical understanding of the text and quotations. Through clear reasoning, the writer draws sophisticated, insightful inferences to support the connected ideas of the topic sentence and thesis. Inferences are developed so that all claims and points made are well-supported and persuasive. There is an appropriate balance of quotes and the writer's own analysis; the writer is able to be convincing through his/her descriptions.
Writing is academic and professional, demonstrating a clear sense of purpose. The points and/or claims expressed in the writing are made directly and supported; vocabulary and phrasing are academically appropriate, persuasive, and sophisticated without being pretentious.
The essay includes a variety of sentences marked by varying structure; effective syntax and grammar demonstrate a mastery of writing conventions and serve the author’s purpose. There is consistent adherence to MLA guidelines while citing every quotation. There are no misspellings and very few punctuation errors.
B
(decent)
Generally engaging opening; areas to be strengthened may include: presentation of general topic, development of transition between attention-grabbing opening and specific thesis statement. The thesis statement is phrased as an argument but may be strengthened through clarification of the main ideas or reasons being offered.
Each topic sentence generally connects to the thesis but in one or more TS the main idea may need to be clarified; concrete details are generally well-chosen though some may be irrelevant or insufficient as evidence to effectively support the thesis and/or TS. Paragraphs are generally well-organized, although some transitions may be awkward and there may be gaps in the development of ideas; the point of a paragraph may not always be clear.
The writing generally reflects a critical, analytical understanding of the texts under analysis but is uneven. Inferences demonstrate interpretive ability but could be ...
ENGL 1303 Ogbaa Essay 1 SummaryStrong Response
ENGL 1303 Ogbaa
Essay 1: Summary/Strong Response
The Prompt
For your first writing assignment, you’ll use the strategies outlined in Chapter 6 of the AB Guide,
“Reading Rhetorically,” to write a summary/strong response essay based on ONE of the following
options:
“The Coddling of the American Mind” by Greg Lukianoff and Johnathan Haidt
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/09/the-coddling-of-the-american-
mind/399356/
“The Trapdoor of Trigger Warnings” by Katy Waldman
http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/cover_story/2016/09/what_science_can_tell_us_a
bout_trigger_warnings.html
Your essay will include (1) a summary of the text (approximately 150-250 words), and (2) a strong
response in which you speak back to that reading from your own critical thinking or values. To
generate ideas for response look to the question-asking strategies in the AB Guide in Chapter 6, pp.
84-114. Your response may take the shape of a rhetorical critique, an ideas critique, or a “blended”
approach where both strategies appear in your paper. Do not write a personal reflection critique.
Envision your audience to be another college student who has heard of the ideas from the text but
hasn’t thought about them thoroughly.
My Rationale
The essay’s objective is to teach summary writing and rhetorical response. By writing, the student will
gain experience in doing both. Before focusing on individual parts or aspects of a text, writers must
consider the text as a whole—hence the need for summary. Summary writing is a valuable tool which
will allow the reader-turned-writer to understand and communicate (in written form) the thesis or
goals of the essay. Strong response provides the reader-turned-writer with the opportunity to look
closely at the essay while using rhetorical language and concepts as a guide.
PRINTED
Rough Draft
due for Peer
Review on
Tues. 9/26
FINAL
Submit by
11:59 pm on
Fri. 9/29 via
TurnItIn
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/09/the-coddling-of-the-american-mind/399356/
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/09/the-coddling-of-the-american-mind/399356/
http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/cover_story/2016/09/what_science_can_tell_us_about_trigger_warnings.html
http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/cover_story/2016/09/what_science_can_tell_us_about_trigger_warnings.html
ENGL 1303 Ogbaa
Basic Structure
Introductory paragraph
Sets up the problem or topic as context for the introduction of your chosen text.
Introduces your text with the author’s name, title, context (where the article appeared), and
author’s central claim or main idea.
Concludes with a tension-filled thesis that sets up clear expectations for the direction of your
essay and gives your reader a sense of the points you will develop and discuss. Your thesis will
express your judgment about the text in terms of rhetorical strategies, successes or problems,
or pos ...
hello, I need a report of 7 pages about the turbines. You can de.docx
hello,
I need a report of 7 pages about the turbines. You can define basically what turbines is , you also can exaplain how it works. you can explain how useful it is.after you write the 7 pages, you should add some images in the report.
if you are not comfortable writting about Turbines, you can write about the transmission and I have a sample report on that.
the report should have that:
Abstract
Introduction
System design
Subsystem design
Modeling and analysis
Performance, predictions, prototype experiment
Risk assessment
Summary, recommendations and lessons learned
Appendices.
this is the rubric.
Sample Technical Report Rubric
Criteria
Distinguished
Proficient
Basic
Unacceptable
Abstract
Proper length, clear, concise summary of material that includes key details.
Proper length and clarity, provides a clear summary of the material to follow.
Word limit not exceeded, communicates some details but may be unclear.
May not fall under word limit. Fails to communicate the important details.
Introduction
The relevance and importance of the report is made clear.
Intended audience is clear from the content; organization of the report is conveyed in a readable manner.
Some relevance and importance is conveyed, but this may be slightly unclear, or lacking in insight or originality
Report organization is conveyed but in a somewhat rote manner.
Relevance may be unclear due to vague terms.
Not insightful or original
Provides little on the report organization.
Little or no reference to the topic or its relevance; audience unclear.
Content
(System Design)
Robust content containing clear, referenced description of data acquisition methods, data sets and their analysis.
Equations are clearly presented and necessary
Results significant and (including discussion of uncertainty) insightful and referenced substantiated discussion.
All elements of report content are present, but some are less developed.
Equations are clearly presented and necessary
Some aspects of the data and analysis may be less clear
Some discussion is engaging some is not.
All elements of report content are present, but one or more are poorly-developed.
Some equations are either missing or not necessary; formatting has minor inconsistencies.
Data, analysis, and results sections are reasonably complete but presented in less than insightful manner.
One or more of the key report elements is/are missing.
Data are incompletely presented and analytical techniques are unclear.
Discussion is non-engaging and straightforward.
Organization
Ideas, methods, data and results are presented logically.
Paragraphs have solid topic sentences.
Transitions link paragraphs and sections. It is easy to follow the line reasoning.
Subheadings are used throughout the paper allowing the reader to reader moves easily through the text.
The ideas are arranged logically to support the central purpose.
Transitions usually link paragraphs.
For the most part, the reader can follow the line of reasoning. Subheadi.
Following the Topic Selection Guidelines below, choose an argumentat.docx
Following the Topic Selection Guidelines below, choose an argumentative topic to research. This will be your topic throughout the entire course, so the activities required for this assignment will provide the foundation for your future Touchstones. The topic for an argumentative research paper must be a debatable topic, meaning that it involves conflicting viewpoints. Additionally, it cannot be a topic that is already decided or agreed upon by most of society. You will need to take a firm position on the topic and use evidence and logic to support the position. Touchstone 1.2 includes a research question, a working thesis, a detailed outline, and a reflection on this pre-writing process.
A. Topic Selection Guidelines
DIRECTIONS:
You may choose any topic you wish as long as the topic has two clear sides and is not agreed upon by most of society. Your topic should be current, appropriate for an academic context and should have a focus suitable for a 6-8 page essay.
B. Research Guidelines
DIRECTIONS:
Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.
1. Research Question and Working Thesis
Keep in mind:
The research question and working thesis are the driving force behind your research and eventual argument.
❒ Your research question should be a single sentence, framed as a question.
❒ Your working thesis should be a single focused sentence, framed as a statement that takes a clear position on the research question.
❒ Include your research question followed by your working thesis.
2. Detailed Outline
Keep in mind:
Your detailed outline provides a map of the argumentative research essay that you will write, including your key claims and the sources that support them. You may not have all your sources yet, and that is fine. The outline is a way to organize your essay and determine which areas (e.g. your sub-points) will require researched evidence as support.
❒ Headings: one for each paragraph with a brief label of the paragraph’s controlling idea(s); at least 7 body paragraphs, an introduction, and a conclusion
❒ Introduction includes your working thesis.
❒ Body paragraphs should each have their own unique title and key points.
❒ Conclusion includes notes on your final thoughts.
❒ Subheadings: two to five for each paragraph, below each heading, indicating key points that support the controlling idea
❒ Sources: one to three for each subheading, as relevant, indicating the support for the key point
❒ For each source, include the author’s name and the idea or information relevant to your argument (e.g. “Lappé on mono-cropping corn/soy and production”).
3. Reflection
❒ Have you displayed a clear understanding of the research activities?
❒ Have you answered all reflection questions thoughtfully and included insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses?
❒ Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment?
C. Reflection Que.
Eng 101 e3 The Summary + Response” ESSAY Writing based on read.docx
Eng 101
e3 The “Summary + Response” ESSAY: Writing based on reading about language, culture & identity
The summary+response essay requires you to use and engage with other written materials - that is, ideas and quotations from other writers - in an essay.
Articles: Tan, "Mother Tongue" (127-132)
In your essay, you will (A) present the writer's ideas accurately and fairly, using your skills in summarizing, paraphrasing, and using quotations. And you will (B) present a thoughtful response, in which you take a stand on the major issue of the original.
You don't need additional information from the internet and you don't need to look for any more sources. If you do want to use another source, you need to clear it with your instructor.
Preliminary Steps
1. Read, re-read, annotate the article you chose.
2. Complete the "Responding to Writing" worksheet to help clarify and organize your thoughts on the issues.
3. Be able to summarize and paraphrase the material accurately.
A Possible Outline for Your Essay
Your essay might be organized something like this, in which each of the first-level bullets would be one or more ¶s:
• Open: Introduce the issues in a general way, possibly without mentioning the article/author yet.
• Introduce & briefly summarize the main article:
· Summarize the main, relevant ideas of the article and include important details. (Include the author's full name and title of the article.)
· Note that you will also refer to and summarize and quote from the article in the response section of the essay, so you don't need to provide a complete, detailed summary here.
• Respond:
· You will probably use some of the ideas you generated in the "Responding to Writing" worksheet.
· Discuss and offer some analysis of the issues raised in the article, and possibly comment on how the author has presented them, how convincing her/his evidence is, and so on.
· Present your own perspectives, thoughts, and perhaps feelings on the issues. You might describe your own life experiences or experiences of friends, as they relate to the issues in question.
· In this response section you need to be sure to explain your ideas clearly and support them (with logic, with illustrative examples, maybe with more quotes from the article).
· If you wish, you can bring in a couple of ideas/quotes from one or two of the additional articles to supplement or support your points.
· This section should be presented in logically organized, focused paragraphs.
• Close: Wrap up the essay in a meaningful and satisfying way.
Think it through!
Don't just grab onto the first thought that comes to you, an initial and superficial reaction. Consider your thoughts and feelings, think hard about the topic and what you have read about it, and form a coherent and thoughtful response.
In a thoughtful response, you don't need to solve or resolve the problem or the issue. You don't have to try to have the "last word" on the topic. Saying that it's troubling (or not) or an im ...
The assignment is to write a paper reflecting on 2-3 topics that w.docx
The assignment is to write a paper reflecting on 2-3 topics that were interesting in the second half of the semester and how you might apply them in the future to your profession. The reflection paper must be at least minimum 2 pages in length but no longer than 3 pages. The reflection paper must be completed in APA format and must provide at minimum 3 outside resources. Please take a few minutes to review the grading rubic, most of what you will review has to do with content and ensuring you are correct writing style. When completing assignment, please upload the document.
Due Friday August 16th, 2019
TOPICS ARE:
· Ergogenic Aids and Performance
&
· Training at Altitude
FUTURE PROFESSION: Physical Therapy
RUBRIC ~
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeComprehension of Material
10.0 pts
Demonstrates excellent comprehension of the assignment’s key principles and issues.
8.5 pts
Demonstrates good comprehension of the assignment’s key principles and issues.
7.5 pts
Demonstrates fair comprehension of the assignment’s key principles and issues.
6.5 pts
Demonstrates poor comprehension of the assignment’s key principles and issues.
0.0 pts
No work submitted.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelopment of Main Points
10.0 pts
Develops main points well in a logical, organized manner.
8.5 pts
Ideas are mostly presented in a logical, organized manner.
7.5 pts
Ideas may stray from topic and are presented with little logic and organization.
6.5 pts
Logic and organization are missing.
0.0 pts
No work submitted.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking
10.0 pts
Offers thorough constructive critique and/or in-depth analysis, insight, reflection.
8.5 pts
Occasionally offers constructive critique and/or in-depth analysis, insight, reflection.
7.5 pts
Offers insufficient constructive critique and/or in-depth analysis, insight, reflection.
6.5 pts
Lacks constructive critique ad/or in-depth analysis, insight, reflection.
0.0 pts
No work submitted.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Resources
5.0 pts
Uses current and credible literature (peer-reviewed journal articles, etc.) beyond course materials to support claims and rationale.
4.0 pts
Mostly uses current and credible literature (peer-reviewed journal articles, etc.) beyond course materials to support claims and rationale.
3.0 pts
Sometimes uses current and credible literature (peer-reviewed journal articles, etc.) beyond course materials to support claims and rationale.
2.0 pts
Rarely uses current and credible literature (peer-reviewed journal articles, etc.) beyond course materials to support claims and rationale.
0.0 pts
Never uses current and credible literature (peer-reviewed journal articles, etc.) beyond course materials to support claims and rationale.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis Through Use of Words
10.0 pts
Always uses own words to synthesize li.
Faculty of Business and LawaCADEMIC YEAR 201819asse.docx
Faculty of Business and Law
aCADEMIC YEAR 2018/19
assessment brief
Module Code:
UMKD6R-15-3
Module Title:
Marketing Services
Submission Deadline:
Wednesday 13th March 2019
Assessment Component
Coursework
Assessment Weighting:
50 per cent of total module mark
Marking and feedback deadline (20 working days)
10th April 2019
Assessment Instructions
This is an individual case-based assignment that requires you to answer a question in relation to the case study below: ‘Woodchurch Furniture’.
Question: Using services marketing theory, analyse and explain Woodchurch’s loss of customersand recommendhow it might improve the customer experience. (100 marks)
General Guidance
· The coursework requires you to select and apply theories, frameworks, and concepts from the first six study units of the module.
· It is your decision as to what theories/frameworks/concepts to use to inform your answer. There is no recommended minimum or maximum number, but generally, quality of application is more important than the quantity of frameworks applied.
· Remember that the requirement is to apply rather than describe theory.
· You may use subheadings in your answer, but avoid excessive use of bullet points.
· Do not reiterate passages from the case study. Obviously, you will need to refer to the case, but do this as succinctly as you can.
· Evidence of relevant reading beyond the lecture slides, with appropriate application of this reading, will be rewarded. Besides textbooks, you may want to explore relevant articles from Journal of Services Marketing,Journal of Service Research, or Service Industries Journal. Other journals will haverelevant articles, but, as implied by their titles, these three focus on services.
· Include a title page, contents, and references. There is no need for an abstract or executive summary. Please number your pages.
Marking Criteria
Please see the grid below:
Criteria
Grading
Analysis (35%)
Recommendations (35%)
Structure (20%)
Literacy, presentation, referencing (10%)
80-100 PASS
Exceptional
Insightful analysis with originality of thought. Identifies underlying issue(s). Excellent application of theory. Demonstrates excellent integration of relevant literature from outside the module reading list.
Highly appropriate, with originality of thought. Consistent with issues raised in the analysis. Exceptional clarity and detail. Supported wherever possible by theory / literature.
Exceptional organization and flow of material with excellent connections between ideas. Introduction is specific and signposts. Conclusion synthesises and may highlight implications of recommendations.
Exceptional standard of literacy and presentation. Near faultless referencing.
70-79 PASS
Excellent
Insightful analysis. Identifies underlying issue(s). Excellent application of theory. Demonstrates excellent integration of relevant literature from outside the module reading list.
Excellent and appropriate, with some originality of thought. Consist.
Cons of ContraceptivesInstructionsFor this assignment, complet.docx
Cons of Contraceptives
Instructions
For this assignment, complete the following:
· Compose a position paper representing the con side of your new topic. (See the Con-Paper Template). The paper should include approximately 6 developed paragraphs:
· Introduction (with thesis statement)
· Context paragraph
· 3 body paragraphs (focusing on 3 cons)
· Conclusion
· Apply a formal tone appropriate for academic audiences, maintaining an objective 3rd person point of view - no 1st person (I, me, my, we, our, us, mine) or 2nd person (you, your). Avoid contractions, clichés, and slang terminology.
· Use the provided template to assist in formatting the title page and document.
· Incorporate at least 3 scholarly sources into the paper. Cite all sources in APA format, both parenthetically and on a reference page.
· Before submission, proofread and edit carefully for spelling, punctuation, and grammar. Not every error will be flagged automatically in word-processing programs, and some that are flagged as errors are actually correct.
Writing Requirements (APA format)
· Length: 2-3 pages (not including the title or reference pages)
· 1-inch margins
· Double spaced
· 12-point Times New Roman font
· Title page
· References page (minimum of 3 academic articles)
Grading
This activity will be graded using the Con-Position Paper Grading Rubric.
Course Outcomes (CO): 3, 6
Rubric
Position Paper Grading Rubric - 125 pts (2)
Position Paper Grading Rubric - 125 pts (2)
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength
5.0 pts
Meets length requirement
0.0 pts
Does not meet length requirement
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePoint Analysis
30.0 pts
The central idea is developed and expanded with depth of critical thought.
25.5 pts
The central idea is discernible and developed.
22.5 pts
The central idea needs more development with points tying back to the thesis.
18.0 pts
The central idea is not developed, and the analysis lacks critical thought.
0.0 pts
No effort
30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupport
30.0 pts
The writing supports claims with several detailed and persuasive examples.
25.5 pts
The writing supports claims with examples, but additional analysis or examples could strengthen the argument.
22.5 pts
The writing supports claims with examples, but the examples are not well-developed or examined. Additional examples and analysis are needed to make the argument more persuasive.
18.0 pts
The central idea is not well-supported by claims and/or examples.
0.0 pts
No effort
30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
25.0 pts
Paper is clear and cohesive. Introduction and conclusion support the overall flow of the paper.
21.25 pts
Paper is basically clear and well-organized with a minimum of non-related material present.
18.75 pts
Paper has some issues with clarity, flow, and cohesion. Paper lacks organization.
15.0 pts
Paper lacks organization and has difficulty staying on tra.
These are Statistic answers needed. If this is not your specialty, p.docx
These are Statistic answers needed. If this is not your specialty, please do not respond. I will be attaching the article and worksheet to complete assignment 3.
Assignment 1
Correlation between Two Variables
Details:
Use Excel to do a correlation between the following variables:
1) X – 2,5,5,6,6,7,8,9
2) Y – 1,2,2,3,4,4,5,5
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
Rubics to follow for assignment 1
Correlation between Two Variables
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
40.0 %
Use Excel to Perform a Correlation Between Two Variables
Failure to demonstrate the ability to use Excel to perform the correlation for the data set.
Demonstrates only minimal ability to use Excel to perform the correlation for the data set.
Demonstrates ability to use Excel to perform the correlation for the data set, but has some slight misunderstanding of the process.
Demonstrates ability to use Excel to perform the correlation for the data set.
Demonstrates clearly and fully the ability to use Excel to perform the correlation for the data set.
30.0 %
Integration of Information from Outside Resources into the Body of Paper
Failure to use references, examples, or explanations.
Provides some supporting examples, but minimal explanations and no published references included.
Supports main points with examples and explanations, but fails to include published references to support claims and ideas.
Supports main points with references, explanations, and examples. Analysis and description is direct, competent, and appropriate of the criteria.
Supports main points with references, examples, and full explanations of how they apply. Thoughtfully analyzes, evaluates, and describes major points of the criteria.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
7.0 %
Assignment Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %
Argument Logic and Construction
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the.
Collaborate Summary RubricCollaborate Summary RubricCriteria0 Poin.docx
Collaborate Summary RubricCollaborate Summary RubricCriteria0 Points - Unacceptable1 Point - Needs Improvement2 Points - Satisfactory3 Points - ExemplaryContent of SummaryDid not provide summarySummary provided less than acceptable evidence that session recording was watched in its entirety. Summary provided satisfactory evidence that session recording was watched in its entirety. Summary proved the student watched and paid attention to the entire session recording. PresentationDid not provide summarySummary not presented in essay form (e.g. bullet lists)Summary provided in essay form, but did not meet 2 page, double spaced, in 11 or 12 point font requirement, or summary was not submitted through Blackboard or not composed in Microsoft Word.Summary met 2 page, double spaced, in 11 or 12 point font requirement. Submitted through the assignment link and composed in Microsoft Word.Clarity & MechanicsDid not provide summary
Summary presented in an unorganized or somewhat unorganized manner, with some clarity and/or grammatical or spelling errors.Summary presented in an organized manner with minor clarity and grammatical or spelling errors.Summary presented in a clear, concise manner and formatted in an easy to read style with no grammatical or spelling errors. Total # of Possible Points: 9
Discussion Board RubricDiscussion Board RubricCriteria0 Points - Unacceptable1 Point - Needs Improvement2 Points - Satisfactory3 Points - ExcellentInitial Posting Timing & Relevance Zero posts or does not meet instructor timeline and requirements.Superficial thought. Adressed limited aspects relevant to the prompt and does not demonstrate understaning of key concepts.
Met partial elements of instructor timeline and requirementsThoughts were well developed and addressed basic aspects relevant to the prompt and demonstrated base knowledge of concepts.
Mostly met instructor timeline and requirements.Thoughts were well developed and fully addressed all aspects relevant to the prompt. Demonstrated excellent integration of key comcepts. Met or exceeded instructor timeline and requirements.Reply Postings Timeline & RelevanceZero replies, or replies not relevant to discussion topicsReplies were limited in relevance or did not enrich discussion (e.g. agrees or disagrees) or met partial elements of instructor timeline and requirements.Elaborated on posts with further comment or observation, relevant to topic. Mostly met instructor timeline and requirements.Demonstrated analysis of others' posts, included meaningful comments. Offered thoughtful insight. Met or exceeded instructor timeline and requirements.Clarity & Mechanics & ReferenceZero posts, or posted unorganized content that may contain multiple grammatical or spelling errors or may be inappropriate. Did not meet instructor requirements for references and citations.Communicated in a somewhat unorganized manner, with some errors in clarity and/or grammatical or spelling errors. Partically met instructor requ ...
You will write a researched argumentative essay using your approved .docx
You will write a researched argumentative essay using your approved topic from Week 3 that follows the requirements below:
Requirements:
at least 3
full
pages without Works Cited
Works Cited (that includes a minimum of five valid, current sources)
Each source should be used a minimum of two times.
Only a maximum of three direct quotes can be used within the paper; the other references should be paraphrases or summaries.
Paraphrases/Summaries/Quotes should be incorporated into the body paragraphs using lead-ins and documented correctly.
proper MLA formatting
Your paper will follow one of the two following outlines:
Outline 1:
I. Introduction
Begin by defining the issue around which people disagree. End with a brief statement of the proposed solution.
II. Representing Side 1
The writer must first write a neutral analysis of the other side's position. This summary includes key arguments along with the proof/reasons for the points.
III. Representing Side 2
The writer then does the same type of neutral analysis of the writer's side of the issue. Just as in the other section, key arguments along with accompanying proof/reasons should be examined.
IV. Common Ground
The next section identifies what the two positions share.
V. Proposed
Solution
The last section offers a proposal to resolve the issue, recognizing that both sides of the argument must be satisfied. This section argues for ways to compromise or for alternative solutions that would benefit both sides under more circumstances than either perspective alone accounts for.
Outline 2:
I. Introduction
Introduce the problem or topic; introduce thesis
II. Writer’s Side
Give side, plus reasons/evidence to support argument
III. Counter Arguments
Give counter arguments against side; then provide rebuttal
IV. Conclusion
Implications of argument, summary of points, etc.
Research Paper Instructions
Format
Follow all
MLA
Guidelines for formal essays.
Margins should be 1” all around. You may have to change the default settings.
Paragraphs should be indented ½ inch.
Double space the entire essay. That means no extra spaces between in heading, title, or body. You might have to reset the default settings on your computer.
Use 12’ Times New Roman Font—no exceptions.
MLA heading
Title: The title is centered, double-spaced after your heading. It is not the title of the question/topic you are researching. It should not be an entire sentence and should be as short as possible but still give the reader a general impression of what the paper is about. Do not underline, bold, italicize, or use quotation marks for your title. Do follow rules of capitalization, which require the first word, the last word, and every important word in the title to be capitalized.
Provide a header with page numbers.
Formal Writing
Do not use 1st person or 2nd person—use 3
rd
person.
Do not use contractions.
Use words for numerals when no more than two words are required. Ex:
ten,four
hundred,
but
123
.
Avoid these.
ENGL 200 Essay Rubric EXEMPLARY A 18-20 10.docx
ENGL 200 Essay Rubric
EXEMPLARY
A
18-20
10
ACCOMPLISHED
B
16-17
8-9
DEVELOPING
C
14-15
6-7
BEGINNING
D
13 or below
5 or below
Argument: Letter Grade (/80)
Purpose and
Audience
/20
The writing engages the reader
with an original approach to the
subject. It may encompass
conflicting ideas and inspires the
reader to contemplate the
relationship of complex ideas.
The essay uses all required
elements of MLA format.
The writing clearly goes beyond
the minimum requirements of
the assignment. It attempts to
engage the reader through
originality and presentation of
complex ideas. The essay uses
most required elements of MLA
formatting, but may be missing
one.
The writing meets the minimum
requirements of the assignment.
It offers insight into the subject
through basic logic and the
presentation of ideas based on
some evidence. The essay uses
some required elements of MLA
formatting, but may be missing a
significant number (two or
more).
The writing fails to meet the
minimum requirements of the
assignment. It offers little
insight into the subject and has
serious flaws in logic and
omissions in evidence. The essay
uses few or no elements of MLA
formatting.
Thesis and
Support
/20
The writing has a clearly
articulated original thesis and
key points supported by relevant
evidence from the text and/or
original research. In addition, all
evidence has been clearly and
thoroughly interpreted for
readers. The writing shows an
accurate understanding of the
events of the text and identifies
all characters and their
relationships to each other and
the events of the text accurately.
The essay discusses specific
interpretations of the text and is
able to associate those
interpretations with specific
events and characters in the text
through well-explained close
reading of quotations.
The writing has a clearly
articulated thesis and key points
supported by appropriate, well-
interpreted evidence and sound
logic, though minor gaps in
logic and argument may appear.
The essay shows an accurate
understanding of the events of
the text and identifies all
characters and their relationships
to each other and the events of
the text accurately. The writing
discusses specific interpretations
of the text, but may not make
the connection between the
evidence from the text and the
interpretations completely clear.
Quotations used may be a bit
longer and less precisely used,
and may need more clear close
reading in order to be fully
accessible to readers.
The writing has a thesis and
related key points supported by
evidence. Logical arguments
may be one-sided or incomplete,
and evidence may not be clearly
or thoroughly interpreted. The
essay may show some confusion
concerning the events and
characters of the text and the
relationships between characters
and events. The writing discusses
specific interpretations of the
t ...
ENGL 200 Essay Rubric EXEMPLARY A 18-20 10.docx
ENGL 200 Essay Rubric
EXEMPLARY
A
18-20
10
ACCOMPLISHED
B
16-17
8-9
DEVELOPING
C
14-15
6-7
BEGINNING
D
13 or below
5 or below
Argument: Letter Grade (/80)
Purpose and
Audience
/20
The writing engages the reader
with an original approach to the
subject. It may encompass
conflicting ideas and inspires the
reader to contemplate the
relationship of complex ideas.
The essay uses all required
elements of MLA format.
The writing clearly goes beyond
the minimum requirements of
the assignment. It attempts to
engage the reader through
originality and presentation of
complex ideas. The essay uses
most required elements of MLA
formatting, but may be missing
one.
The writing meets the minimum
requirements of the assignment.
It offers insight into the subject
through basic logic and the
presentation of ideas based on
some evidence. The essay uses
some required elements of MLA
formatting, but may be missing a
significant number (two or
more).
The writing fails to meet the
minimum requirements of the
assignment. It offers little
insight into the subject and has
serious flaws in logic and
omissions in evidence. The essay
uses few or no elements of MLA
formatting.
Thesis and
Support
/20
The writing has a clearly
articulated original thesis and
key points supported by relevant
evidence from the text and/or
original research. In addition, all
evidence has been clearly and
thoroughly interpreted for
readers. The writing shows an
accurate understanding of the
events of the text and identifies
all characters and their
relationships to each other and
the events of the text accurately.
The essay discusses specific
interpretations of the text and is
able to associate those
interpretations with specific
events and characters in the text
through well-explained close
reading of quotations.
The writing has a clearly
articulated thesis and key points
supported by appropriate, well-
interpreted evidence and sound
logic, though minor gaps in
logic and argument may appear.
The essay shows an accurate
understanding of the events of
the text and identifies all
characters and their relationships
to each other and the events of
the text accurately. The writing
discusses specific interpretations
of the text, but may not make
the connection between the
evidence from the text and the
interpretations completely clear.
Quotations used may be a bit
longer and less precisely used,
and may need more clear close
reading in order to be fully
accessible to readers.
The writing has a thesis and
related key points supported by
evidence. Logical arguments
may be one-sided or incomplete,
and evidence may not be clearly
or thoroughly interpreted. The
essay may show some confusion
concerning the events and
characters of the text and the
relationships between characters
and events. The writing discusses
specific interpretations of the
t.
Top of FormBottom of FormPersuasive Essay Peer Review Wor.docx
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Persuasive Essay: Peer Review Worksheet
Part of your responsibility as a student in this course is to provide quality feedback to your peers to help them improve their writing skills. This worksheet will assist you in providing that feedback. Submit this review as an attachment to both your instructor within the assignment bin and into your reply to your peer’s post containing the assigned draft.
Name of the Draft’s Author:
Name of the Peer Reviewer:
Summary
After reading through the draft one time, write a summary (3–5 sentences) of the paper. This should include the stance and the three sub-topics used to support the position within the essay. Do not place your own critique of the essay within this space.
Evaluate the Essay
After a second, closer reading of the draft, evaluate the essay using the Persuasive Essay: Final Draft rubric below. Determine the level of achievement appropriate for each assignment criteria. (Level of achievement ranges from Unsatisfactory to Excellent and are found at the top of the rubric. Assignment criteria are found in the left column of the rubric.). Please use the highlighting tool to score your peer within each criteria. Then use the right hand side of the rubric to include a rationale with evidence and examples for the score.
Topic 7 Rubric: Persuasive Essay: Final Draft
Criteria
1
Unsatisfactory
2
Less Than Satisfactory
3
Satisfactory
4
Good
5
Excellent
Why was this score determined for your peer’s essay? What evidence/examples do you have for this score?
% Scaling
0%
65%
75%
85%
100%
Content – 70%
Objective Perspective and Position
Addresses a single source or view of the argument and fails to clarify presented position relative to one’s own.
Appropriately identifies one’s own position on the topic. Vague explanation of the position is given. Little reference to specific issues related to the topic is made. Position completely appeals to emotion instead of reason.
Appropriately identifies one’s position on the topic. Explains the position taken in a coherent way. Sound reference to specific issues related to the topic is made. Position mostly appeals to emotion instead of reason.
Formulates a clear and precise point of view of the topic. Clearly explains the position taken. Sound and detailed reference to specific issues related to the topic is made. Position appeals mostly to reason.
Formulates a clear and precise point of view of the topic. Comprehensively explains the position taken. Specific issues related to the topic are fully presented in great detail. Position appeals to reason.
Rationale for score:
Word Count
Word count is less than half the minimum or more than double the maximum.
Body of essay is more than 100 words over or under the word count.
Body of essay is more than 50 but less than 100 words over or under the word count.
Body of essay is over or under the word count by 50 words or less.
Within the appropriate word count.
Ra ...
WarningYou do not have permissions to perform this activityA.docx
Warning
You do not have permissions to perform this activity
Assignment
Week 10 | Diversity in the Health Care Organization
Details:
1) Providers must learn new tools to eliminate disparities, build trust with patients, and understand how international biases and pre-established stereotypes affect quality of care. Write a paper (1,000-1,250 words) that identifies and defines various tools and measurements that can be used to measure the effectiveness of diversity programs and policies established by the organization.
2) Address how each of the following must be considered when considering how to implement an environment of diversity:
a) Government regulations.
b) Social pressures.
c) Industry and company ethical codes.
d) Tension between personal standards and the goals of the organization.
3) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
4) This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
Top of Form
Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the "Submit" button under "Final Submission" is clicked.
New Attempt
Bottom of Form
Title
Attached Documents
Turnitin Report
Similarity Index
Final Submission
Click 'New Attempt' to start assignment or attach documents
Error Details
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
Apply Rubrics
Addressing Diversity
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
100.0 %Content
40.0 %In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
Does not demonstrate understanding of the issues surrounding diversity, including the implications. Does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the situation, and does not develop effective answers to the questions, with rationale.
Demonstrates only minimal understanding diversity. Demonstrates only minimal abilities for critical thinking and analysis of the case study, and develops weak answers to the questions, with minimal rationale
Demonstrates knowledge of issues surrounding diversity, but has some slight misunderstanding of the implications. Provides a basic idea of critical thinking and analysis for the questions, answers, and rationale. Does not include examples or descriptions.
Demonstrates acceptable knowledge of the issues surrounding diversity (in your own words). Develops an acceptable response and rationale for it. Utilizes some examples.
Demonstrates thorough knowledge of the issues surrounding diversity and their implications. Clearly answers the questions and develops a very strong rationale. Introduces appropri.
Similar to Critical Analysis Rubric.docx (20)
ENG-106 Rubric Proposal EssayCriteria Value1 Unsatisfacto.docx
ENG-106 Rubric Proposal EssayCriteria Value1 Unsatisfacto.docx
ENG-106 Rubric Cause and Effect Argument Criteria Value1 .docx
ENG-106 Rubric Cause and Effect Argument Criteria Value1 .docx
ENG-106 Rubric Definition Argument Criteria Value1 Unsati.docx
ENG-106 Rubric Definition Argument Criteria Value1 Unsati.docx
ENG-106 Rubric Definition Argument Criteria Value1 Unsati
ENG-106 Rubric Definition Argument Criteria Value1 Unsati
EXPOSITORY ESSAY WITH ANALYSIS RUBRICGRADEIntro Paragraph .docx
EXPOSITORY ESSAY WITH ANALYSIS RUBRICGRADEIntro Paragraph .docx
hello, I need a report of 7 pages about the turbines. You can de.docx
hello, I need a report of 7 pages about the turbines. You can de.docx
Following the Topic Selection Guidelines below, choose an argumentat.docx
Following the Topic Selection Guidelines below, choose an argumentat.docx
Eng 101 e3 The Summary + Response” ESSAY Writing based on read.docx
Eng 101 e3 The Summary + Response” ESSAY Writing based on read.docx
The assignment is to write a paper reflecting on 2-3 topics that w.docx
The assignment is to write a paper reflecting on 2-3 topics that w.docx
Faculty of Business and LawaCADEMIC YEAR 201819asse.docx
Faculty of Business and LawaCADEMIC YEAR 201819asse.docx
Cons of ContraceptivesInstructionsFor this assignment, complet.docx
Cons of ContraceptivesInstructionsFor this assignment, complet.docx
These are Statistic answers needed. If this is not your specialty, p.docx
These are Statistic answers needed. If this is not your specialty, p.docx
Collaborate Summary RubricCollaborate Summary RubricCriteria0 Poin.docx
Collaborate Summary RubricCollaborate Summary RubricCriteria0 Poin.docx
You will write a researched argumentative essay using your approved .docx
You will write a researched argumentative essay using your approved .docx
Top of FormBottom of FormPersuasive Essay Peer Review Wor.docx
Top of FormBottom of FormPersuasive Essay Peer Review Wor.docx
WarningYou do not have permissions to perform this activityA.docx
WarningYou do not have permissions to perform this activityA.docx
More from RebekahHawk2
EN 205 Session 8A Editing & Formatting FD SS1.pptx
Use this rubric to grade short stories written by your students.
More from RebekahHawk2 (8)
EN 205 Session 8A Editing & Formatting FD SS1.pptx
EN 205 Session 8A Editing & Formatting FD SS1.pptx
Recently uploaded
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH ANSWERS.
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI funded books
Wednesday 22 May 2024, 14:00-15:00.
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH GLOBAL SUCCESS LỚP 3 - CẢ NĂM (CÓ FILE NGHE VÀ ĐÁP Á...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH GLOBAL SUCCESS LỚP 3 - CẢ NĂM (CÓ FILE NGHE VÀ ĐÁP Á...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
https://app.box.com/s/hqnndn05v4q5a4k4jd597rkdbda0fniiSynthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
Advantages and Disadvantages of CMS from an SEO Perspective
Advantages and Disadvantages of CMS from an SEO Perspective
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
This ppt include the description of the edible vaccine i.e. a new concept over the traditional vaccine administered by injection.
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama UniversityAkanksha trivedi rama nursing college kanpur.
Natural birth techniques are various type such as/ water birth , alexender method, hypnosis, bradley method, lamaze method etcMule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Event Link:-
https://meetups.mulesoft.com/events/details/mulesoft-mysore-presents-exploring-gemini-ai-and-integration-with-mulesoft/
Agenda
● Java 17 Upgrade Overview
● Why and by when do customers need to upgrade to Java 17?
● Is there any immediate impact to upgrading to Mule Runtime 4.6 and beyond?
● Which MuleSoft products are in scope?
For Upcoming Meetups Join Mysore Meetup Group - https://meetups.mulesoft.com/mysore/
YouTube:- youtube.com/@mulesoftmysore
Mysore WhatsApp group:- https://chat.whatsapp.com/EhqtHtCC75vCAX7gaO842N
Speaker:-
Shubham Chaurasia - https://www.linkedin.com/in/shubhamchaurasia1/
Priya Shaw - https://www.linkedin.com/in/priya-shaw
Organizers:-
Shubham Chaurasia - https://www.linkedin.com/in/shubhamchaurasia1/
Giridhar Meka - https://www.linkedin.com/in/giridharmeka
Priya Shaw - https://www.linkedin.com/in/priya-shaw
Shyam Raj Prasad-
https://www.linkedin.com/in/shyam-raj-prasad/
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Digital Artifact 2 - Investigating Pavilion Designs
Digital Artifact 2 - Pavilions
NGV Architecture Commission Competition
MPavilion Commission Competition
Other Pavilion Designs
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar KanvariaRecently uploaded (20)
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH GLOBAL SUCCESS LỚP 3 - CẢ NĂM (CÓ FILE NGHE VÀ ĐÁP Á...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH GLOBAL SUCCESS LỚP 3 - CẢ NĂM (CÓ FILE NGHE VÀ ĐÁP Á...
Multithreading_in_C++ - std::thread, race condition
Multithreading_in_C++ - std::thread, race condition
Advantages and Disadvantages of CMS from an SEO Perspective
Advantages and Disadvantages of CMS from an SEO Perspective
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Pride Month Slides 2024 David Douglas School District
Pride Month Slides 2024 David Douglas School District
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
Digital Artifact 2 - Investigating Pavilion Designs
Digital Artifact 2 - Investigating Pavilion Designs
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...
Critical Analysis Rubric.docx
- 1. EN 403 Mrs. Hawk Fall 2021 Critical Analysis Rubric Criteria Above-average Average Below Average Introduction 10% Attention-getting topic sentence. States title and author of work under analysis. Succinct summary of the original author’s main ideas and thesis. Clearly states critic’s (your own) thesis. Passive topic sentence. States title and author. Rambling summary of original author’s main ideas/thesis. Critic’s thesis is vague. No topic sentence. Reference to title/author is missing. Misidentifies author’s main points/thesis. No critic’s thesis. Summary 15% Correctly identifies main ideas of the article. Leaves out illustrations, quotations. Each idea flows cohesively to the next. Correctly identifies most of the main ideas. Includes illustrations, quotations, or other details that are not main ideas. Attempts cohesion. Relation of ideas is not unclear. Misrepresents/fails to identify the main ideas of the original work. Relies upon quotations rather than summary. Lacks cohesion so that the organization is unclear. Analysis 25% Uses specific examples/quotations to focus on significant aspects of the work. Substantiates opinions with logic, evidence, etc. Sentences flow cohesively. Focuses on important general aspects of the work without using specific examples/quotations. Attempts to substantiate with logic, evidence, etc. but is unconvincing. Some sentences lack cohesion but paragraphs, overall, are not unclear. Fails to analyze significant aspects of the work or misrepresents the original author’s ideas. May fail to engage with the work itself. Provides little to no substantiation for opinions. Lacks cohesion so that paragraphs are unclear. Conclusion 10% Restates thesis and main ideas of the analysis section. Ends with clear call to action. Attempts to reinforce thesis and main ideas of the analysis. Vague call to action. Fails to restate thesis and main ideas of the analysis section. No call to action. Checklist: Grammar and Style 30%--The ideal paper is free of grammatical and mechanical errors, avoids nominalizations where possible, and puts characters and actions into the subject and verb positions. Formatting 10%--Follow MLA format (including heading, page numbers, margins, in-text citations, and works cited page).