Core Journals in Psychology: A Demonstration Project
•Download as PPT, PDF•
2 likes•244 views
Powerpoint slides accompanying my presentation at the Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) 2009 National Conference in Seattle, WA.
Report
Share
Report
Share
![Core Journals in Psychology: A Demonstration Project ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/corejournalspaynter-090311135855-phpapp02/85/Core-Journals-in-Psychology-A-Demonstration-Project-1-320.jpg)
![Project Goals ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Recommended
Citation Searching & Bibliometrics
This document discusses citation searching and bibliometrics. It introduces citation analysis and how it is used in bibliometrics to estimate the popularity and impact of articles and authors by analyzing citations. Journal Impact Factor is calculated by counting citations at the journal level. The document also discusses the h-index and alternatives to journal Impact Factor, including Eigenfactor, SCImago Journal Rank, usage statistics, and qualitative evaluation through services like Faculty of 1000. While bibliometrics provide quantitative data about publications, the usefulness and reliability of citation counts and Impact Factor have been questioned, leading to new alternative evaluation methods.
Review on a Journal article
1) The study aimed to compare citations from ISI, Google Scholar, and Google Web/URL of 1,650 journal articles across disciplines to understand differences in conventional and web-based citation patterns.
2) It found significant correlations between ISI citations and Google Scholar/Web citations in many science and social science fields, with Google Scholar correlating more strongly.
3) There were clear disciplinary differences observed, with Google Scholar being used more in computer science and social sciences compared to ISI.
M sc env poll control oct 2013
This document provides an overview of a library skills and literature searching session for an MSc Environmental Pollution Control course. It introduces students to essential library resources like the library catalogue, Summon, and subject guides. It also covers literature searching, including an introduction to databases like Web of Science, Science Direct, and ProQuest. Students are shown how to search these databases to find peer-reviewed journal articles on their topics. The document demonstrates how to access full text and use inter-library loans when articles are not available. It also briefly discusses Google Scholar and referencing.
Google Scholar vs. MEDLINE for Health Sciences Literature Searching
This document summarizes and compares Google Scholar and MEDLINE for health sciences literature searching. MEDLINE indexes over 16 million citations from 5,400 journals back to 1949 and uses controlled vocabularies like MeSH for standardized searching. It is focused on health sciences but lacks full text. Google Scholar searches the full text of scholarly articles, books, and websites but has inconsistent coverage, formatting, and lacks controlled vocabularies. Both tools have strengths and limitations, so they are most effective when used together for comprehensive literature searching.
Measuring research impact with bibliometrics
Updated 30/01/2015
This session included discussions around the value of bibliometrics for individual performance management/promotion and the REF.
What are bibliometrics?
Journal metrics
Personal metrics
Article level metrics and altmetrics
Serving the Biomedical Research Community
The document discusses changing roles for libraries and librarians in serving the biomedical research community. It outlines new roles like informationists, outreach, and increasing the library's virtual presence. It also covers challenges around scholarly communication and increasing the visibility of the library to faculty and students. The opportunities discussed include shaping open access initiatives and digital repositories as well as increasing library spaces and services.
Bibliometrics (1) JIFs and JCRs
Eugene Garfield first proposed the idea of journal impact factors in 1955 to measure the impact and influence of academic journals. In the 1960s, the Science Citation Index was developed to track citations between papers. Starting in 1975, the Journal Citation Reports used Web of Science data to annually rank journals within disciplines based on their impact factors, calculated as the citations in the current year to articles published in the previous two years divided by the total number of citable items published in those two years. While impact factors provide a metric for comparing journals within a field, they should not be used to compare journals across different disciplines due to variability in citation conventions between fields.
Workshop presentation.in research tools
This file may be useful variety of researchers,scientists as well as trainers in different filed of researches . Hopefully that be help you through the direction of research.
Recommended
Citation Searching & Bibliometrics
This document discusses citation searching and bibliometrics. It introduces citation analysis and how it is used in bibliometrics to estimate the popularity and impact of articles and authors by analyzing citations. Journal Impact Factor is calculated by counting citations at the journal level. The document also discusses the h-index and alternatives to journal Impact Factor, including Eigenfactor, SCImago Journal Rank, usage statistics, and qualitative evaluation through services like Faculty of 1000. While bibliometrics provide quantitative data about publications, the usefulness and reliability of citation counts and Impact Factor have been questioned, leading to new alternative evaluation methods.
Review on a Journal article
1) The study aimed to compare citations from ISI, Google Scholar, and Google Web/URL of 1,650 journal articles across disciplines to understand differences in conventional and web-based citation patterns.
2) It found significant correlations between ISI citations and Google Scholar/Web citations in many science and social science fields, with Google Scholar correlating more strongly.
3) There were clear disciplinary differences observed, with Google Scholar being used more in computer science and social sciences compared to ISI.
M sc env poll control oct 2013
This document provides an overview of a library skills and literature searching session for an MSc Environmental Pollution Control course. It introduces students to essential library resources like the library catalogue, Summon, and subject guides. It also covers literature searching, including an introduction to databases like Web of Science, Science Direct, and ProQuest. Students are shown how to search these databases to find peer-reviewed journal articles on their topics. The document demonstrates how to access full text and use inter-library loans when articles are not available. It also briefly discusses Google Scholar and referencing.
Google Scholar vs. MEDLINE for Health Sciences Literature Searching
This document summarizes and compares Google Scholar and MEDLINE for health sciences literature searching. MEDLINE indexes over 16 million citations from 5,400 journals back to 1949 and uses controlled vocabularies like MeSH for standardized searching. It is focused on health sciences but lacks full text. Google Scholar searches the full text of scholarly articles, books, and websites but has inconsistent coverage, formatting, and lacks controlled vocabularies. Both tools have strengths and limitations, so they are most effective when used together for comprehensive literature searching.
Measuring research impact with bibliometrics
Updated 30/01/2015
This session included discussions around the value of bibliometrics for individual performance management/promotion and the REF.
What are bibliometrics?
Journal metrics
Personal metrics
Article level metrics and altmetrics
Serving the Biomedical Research Community
The document discusses changing roles for libraries and librarians in serving the biomedical research community. It outlines new roles like informationists, outreach, and increasing the library's virtual presence. It also covers challenges around scholarly communication and increasing the visibility of the library to faculty and students. The opportunities discussed include shaping open access initiatives and digital repositories as well as increasing library spaces and services.
Bibliometrics (1) JIFs and JCRs
Eugene Garfield first proposed the idea of journal impact factors in 1955 to measure the impact and influence of academic journals. In the 1960s, the Science Citation Index was developed to track citations between papers. Starting in 1975, the Journal Citation Reports used Web of Science data to annually rank journals within disciplines based on their impact factors, calculated as the citations in the current year to articles published in the previous two years divided by the total number of citable items published in those two years. While impact factors provide a metric for comparing journals within a field, they should not be used to compare journals across different disciplines due to variability in citation conventions between fields.
Workshop presentation.in research tools
This file may be useful variety of researchers,scientists as well as trainers in different filed of researches . Hopefully that be help you through the direction of research.
Downloads and Citatations_ Henk Moed_Gali Halevi
This document analyzes usage and citation patterns based on data from Elsevier publications on ScienceDirect. It includes journal-level data on downloads and citations from 2004-2010 for 1,800 journals. It also contains document-level data on downloads and citations for articles published in 62 ScienceDirect journals from 2008-2012. Additional data includes user sessions, institutions, countries, and terms. Charts show trends in downloads over time at the journal, article, disciplinary, and user levels. The conclusion discusses 10 factors that differentiate downloads and citations, such as different user and author populations, obsolescence functions, and sensitivity to manipulation.
2014 09-04-foster-metricsworkshopslides
Discussion about etablished metrics (citation analysis, journal impact factor, h-index) and altmetrics in order to measure research outputs
Freely Available Scholarly Metrics
This document provides an overview of bibliometric metrics for evaluating scholarly work, including both freely available and paid subscription metrics. It discusses journal-level metrics like impact factor, acceptance rates, and Scimago rankings. Article-level metrics mentioned include citations, downloads, and Altmetric scores. Author-level metrics like the h-index are also covered. Paid bibliometrics from Web of Science and Scopus are noted. Freely available options highlighted are Google Scholar for citations, rankings, and profiles, as well as Scimago for journal rankings. Caveats about the limitations of metrics are also summarized.
The Evolving Role of the Library in Institutional and Faculty Assessment
A Discussion of Research Metrics - June 2016
Kim Powel, Life Sciences Informationist Emory University
Holly Miller, Associate Dean Scholarly Content and Faculty Engagement, Florida International University
Joey Figueroa, Solutions Specialist Thomson Reuters
Bibliometrics: journals, articles, authors (v2)
Presented to members of the Psychology department as part of the New Tricks Seminar series (February 2016)
• journal metrics using WoS and Scopus
• article level metrics in WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar, and from publishers and the differences in each. Touch on altmetrics.
• author metrics in the above. Touch on Publish or Perish
Tanya Williamson, Academic Liaison Librarian
Alternative Avenues of Discovery: Competition or Potential
The document discusses alternative avenues of discovery for libraries, focusing on three emerging examples that correspond to the themes of reaching out, providing intuitive services, and gaining insights from analytics. The first example is Libhub via Zepheira, which uses linked data to extend library catalogs onto the web. The second is 1science Open Access Solutions, which expands discoverable content by making institutional repository publications freely available. The third is Yewno's inference engine, which supports discovery by revealing connections between concepts based on underlying scholarly content.
Citation analysis for research evaluation
The document discusses various methods and data sources for performing citation analysis and research evaluation, including using citation data from Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. It also covers benchmarking research groups using metrics like the h-index and Essential Science Indicators, evaluating researchers based on citation metrics and journal impact factors, and limitations of using citation data and journal impact factors for research assessment.
Citation Trends in Library & Information Science
The document presents a bibliometric analysis of articles published in the journal "Library Trends" from 2012 to 2016. It finds that 219 articles were published over this period, with the highest number of contributions coming from US authors. The study analyzes authorship patterns, citation trends, and identifies the most prolific authors and most frequently cited journals. It concludes that bibliometric data can provide useful insights but may not always follow established laws due to various influencing factors.
Access to Freely Available Journal Articles: Gold, Green, and Rogue Open Ac...
A recent bibliometrics study found that 54% of 4.6 million scientific papers from peer-reviewed journals indexed in Scopus during the years 2011-2013 could be downloaded for free on the internet in April of 2014 (Archambault, et al. 2014). As time rolls on, authors and researchers are increasingly using more-and-less legal scholarly article sharing services to "take back the literature," or even just to access it more conveniently (Bohannon, 2016). The objective of this study was to evaluate a manageable sample of journal articles across the sciences, social sciences and humanities for their availability in gold, green and rogue open access forms, including ResearchGate and Sci-Hub. Attendees will gain a greater appreciation of the extent of open access availability through Google Scholar, Google and commercial discovery systems, and will be challenged to roll with the times by expanding the role of libraries in broadening access to the freely available literature.
Scholarly Metrics Bootcamp USAIN 2014 Pre-conference workshop
This document provides an overview of scholarly metrics and bibliometrics tools. It discusses the purpose of metrics in evaluating scholarship given the large volume of publications. It covers common article, journal, and author-level metrics including times cited, impact factor, H-index, and altmetrics. The workshop demonstrates hands-on training with bibliometric databases and tools like Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, Journal Citation Reports, and Publish or Perish. It emphasizes that no single metric can evaluate quality and that metrics must be considered in the appropriate disciplinary context. The document aims to help librarians and scholars appropriately use and interpret bibliometric data.
Cardiff bibliometrics repository ref_july 2014
This document discusses bibliometrics and their use at Cardiff University. It begins with an introduction to bibliometric measures like citations, impact factors, and altmetrics. It then discusses how bibliometric data is presented in Cardiff's institutional repository and how it was used to provide context for research evaluations in the UK's REF2014 assessment exercise. The document concludes by outlining Cardiff's trial of the SciVal analytics tool and plans for a new research information system to better integrate bibliometric and altmetric data.
Bibliometrics and research impact workshop in the scienes and engineering fields
This presentation gives an introduction to researchers in the sciences and engineering about bibliometrics. It also recommends ways to increase impact of published and non-published works.
Bibliometrics jul 2014
This document provides a brief introduction to bibliometrics and citation metrics. It discusses how bibliometrics can be used to measure the impact of journals, authors, research groups, and institutions through citation counts from databases like Web of Knowledge, Scopus, and Google Scholar. It also defines common metrics like the Impact Factor and h-index and discusses how to calculate and interpret these metrics. Finally, it addresses some criticisms of bibliometrics and alternative metrics that are emerging, like altmetrics which measure article usage and social media mentions.
Data in Brief and Dataverse: Incentivizing Authors to Share Data by Paige Sha...
Data in Brief, an Open Access journal published by Elsevier, exclusively publishes data articles wherein researchers describe their datasets. Data in Brief requires that all data be made publicly available either directly with the article as supplementary files or in a public repository. Data in Brief has teamed up with Dataverse to provide a venue for authors to archive and openly share their data.
Scopus : the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature
Scopus is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature: scientific journals, books and conference proceedings. Delivering a comprehensive overview of the world's research output in the fields of science, technology, medicine, social sciences, and arts and humanities, Scopus features smart tools to track, analyse and visualise research.
As research becomes increasingly global, interdisciplinary and collaborative, you can make sure that critical research from around the world is not missed when you choose Scopus.
Who's counting: an introduction to bibliometrics
Presentation from a University of York Library workshop on bibliometrics. The session covers how published research outputs are measured at the article, author and journal level; with discussion of the limitations of a bibliometric approach.
Scholarly impact metrics traditions
This document provides an overview of traditional scholarly impact metrics like citation count and impact factor, as well as new developments in altmetrics. It begins with an introduction to why citations are counted and the sources of citation data. It then discusses common metrics for measuring the impact of individuals, journals, and institutions. These include the h-index, journal impact factor, and global university rankings. The document also notes some limitations and issues with traditional metrics and outlines new areas of development in altmetrics.
Intro to altmetrics
Altmetrics provide alternative measures of impact beyond traditional citations by tracking attention on social media and other platforms. They can provide faster insights than citations, which take time to accumulate, and can measure impact on audiences beyond academics. However, altmetrics also have limitations as coverage varies by discipline and not all attention translates to citations or impact. Social media mentions have been shown to correlate with early citations and downloads, helping measure alternative concepts of impact.
MSc Biomedical Science Oct 2013
This document provides an overview of an introductory library skills session for an MSc in Biomedical Science program. It covers essential library resources like the library catalogue, Summon, and subject guides. It also covers literature searching skills like developing search strategies, using databases like Medline and Science Direct to find articles, and accessing full texts. Other topics covered include identifying peer-reviewed articles, comparing Google Scholar and Web of Science, and referencing.
Mining Research Publication Networks for Impact -- KMi Internal Seminar
This document discusses a PhD research project that aims to evaluate the quality of research publications. It outlines limitations of current peer review and bibliometric methods for evaluating quality. The research will analyze publication networks and full texts to identify factors influencing quality and develop new quality evaluation methods. The goals are to create metrics that are more accurate, understandable, resistant to manipulation and faster than citations. The research involves collecting publication data from various sources, analyzing networks and text, and developing composite metrics to estimate quality for different disciplines.
Preparing High School Students With Disabilities For College03
The document discusses preparing high school students with disabilities for college. It provides research-based objectives for college-bound students with special needs, including promoting effective learning strategies and self-determination skills. Models of memory and learning are reviewed. Disability laws requiring accommodations in higher education are also summarized. Successful traits of students with disabilities in college include utilizing support services and having awareness of their own learning abilities.
Commercial Serials Decision Support Systems
Slides to accompany an Oregon Library Association (OLA) / Washington Library Association (WLA) 2008 Joint Conference presentation on Commercial Serials Decision Support Systems.
More Related Content
What's hot
Downloads and Citatations_ Henk Moed_Gali Halevi
This document analyzes usage and citation patterns based on data from Elsevier publications on ScienceDirect. It includes journal-level data on downloads and citations from 2004-2010 for 1,800 journals. It also contains document-level data on downloads and citations for articles published in 62 ScienceDirect journals from 2008-2012. Additional data includes user sessions, institutions, countries, and terms. Charts show trends in downloads over time at the journal, article, disciplinary, and user levels. The conclusion discusses 10 factors that differentiate downloads and citations, such as different user and author populations, obsolescence functions, and sensitivity to manipulation.
2014 09-04-foster-metricsworkshopslides
Discussion about etablished metrics (citation analysis, journal impact factor, h-index) and altmetrics in order to measure research outputs
Freely Available Scholarly Metrics
This document provides an overview of bibliometric metrics for evaluating scholarly work, including both freely available and paid subscription metrics. It discusses journal-level metrics like impact factor, acceptance rates, and Scimago rankings. Article-level metrics mentioned include citations, downloads, and Altmetric scores. Author-level metrics like the h-index are also covered. Paid bibliometrics from Web of Science and Scopus are noted. Freely available options highlighted are Google Scholar for citations, rankings, and profiles, as well as Scimago for journal rankings. Caveats about the limitations of metrics are also summarized.
The Evolving Role of the Library in Institutional and Faculty Assessment
A Discussion of Research Metrics - June 2016
Kim Powel, Life Sciences Informationist Emory University
Holly Miller, Associate Dean Scholarly Content and Faculty Engagement, Florida International University
Joey Figueroa, Solutions Specialist Thomson Reuters
Bibliometrics: journals, articles, authors (v2)
Presented to members of the Psychology department as part of the New Tricks Seminar series (February 2016)
• journal metrics using WoS and Scopus
• article level metrics in WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar, and from publishers and the differences in each. Touch on altmetrics.
• author metrics in the above. Touch on Publish or Perish
Tanya Williamson, Academic Liaison Librarian
Alternative Avenues of Discovery: Competition or Potential
The document discusses alternative avenues of discovery for libraries, focusing on three emerging examples that correspond to the themes of reaching out, providing intuitive services, and gaining insights from analytics. The first example is Libhub via Zepheira, which uses linked data to extend library catalogs onto the web. The second is 1science Open Access Solutions, which expands discoverable content by making institutional repository publications freely available. The third is Yewno's inference engine, which supports discovery by revealing connections between concepts based on underlying scholarly content.
Citation analysis for research evaluation
The document discusses various methods and data sources for performing citation analysis and research evaluation, including using citation data from Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. It also covers benchmarking research groups using metrics like the h-index and Essential Science Indicators, evaluating researchers based on citation metrics and journal impact factors, and limitations of using citation data and journal impact factors for research assessment.
Citation Trends in Library & Information Science
The document presents a bibliometric analysis of articles published in the journal "Library Trends" from 2012 to 2016. It finds that 219 articles were published over this period, with the highest number of contributions coming from US authors. The study analyzes authorship patterns, citation trends, and identifies the most prolific authors and most frequently cited journals. It concludes that bibliometric data can provide useful insights but may not always follow established laws due to various influencing factors.
Access to Freely Available Journal Articles: Gold, Green, and Rogue Open Ac...
A recent bibliometrics study found that 54% of 4.6 million scientific papers from peer-reviewed journals indexed in Scopus during the years 2011-2013 could be downloaded for free on the internet in April of 2014 (Archambault, et al. 2014). As time rolls on, authors and researchers are increasingly using more-and-less legal scholarly article sharing services to "take back the literature," or even just to access it more conveniently (Bohannon, 2016). The objective of this study was to evaluate a manageable sample of journal articles across the sciences, social sciences and humanities for their availability in gold, green and rogue open access forms, including ResearchGate and Sci-Hub. Attendees will gain a greater appreciation of the extent of open access availability through Google Scholar, Google and commercial discovery systems, and will be challenged to roll with the times by expanding the role of libraries in broadening access to the freely available literature.
Scholarly Metrics Bootcamp USAIN 2014 Pre-conference workshop
This document provides an overview of scholarly metrics and bibliometrics tools. It discusses the purpose of metrics in evaluating scholarship given the large volume of publications. It covers common article, journal, and author-level metrics including times cited, impact factor, H-index, and altmetrics. The workshop demonstrates hands-on training with bibliometric databases and tools like Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, Journal Citation Reports, and Publish or Perish. It emphasizes that no single metric can evaluate quality and that metrics must be considered in the appropriate disciplinary context. The document aims to help librarians and scholars appropriately use and interpret bibliometric data.
Cardiff bibliometrics repository ref_july 2014
This document discusses bibliometrics and their use at Cardiff University. It begins with an introduction to bibliometric measures like citations, impact factors, and altmetrics. It then discusses how bibliometric data is presented in Cardiff's institutional repository and how it was used to provide context for research evaluations in the UK's REF2014 assessment exercise. The document concludes by outlining Cardiff's trial of the SciVal analytics tool and plans for a new research information system to better integrate bibliometric and altmetric data.
Bibliometrics and research impact workshop in the scienes and engineering fields
This presentation gives an introduction to researchers in the sciences and engineering about bibliometrics. It also recommends ways to increase impact of published and non-published works.
Bibliometrics jul 2014
This document provides a brief introduction to bibliometrics and citation metrics. It discusses how bibliometrics can be used to measure the impact of journals, authors, research groups, and institutions through citation counts from databases like Web of Knowledge, Scopus, and Google Scholar. It also defines common metrics like the Impact Factor and h-index and discusses how to calculate and interpret these metrics. Finally, it addresses some criticisms of bibliometrics and alternative metrics that are emerging, like altmetrics which measure article usage and social media mentions.
Data in Brief and Dataverse: Incentivizing Authors to Share Data by Paige Sha...
Data in Brief, an Open Access journal published by Elsevier, exclusively publishes data articles wherein researchers describe their datasets. Data in Brief requires that all data be made publicly available either directly with the article as supplementary files or in a public repository. Data in Brief has teamed up with Dataverse to provide a venue for authors to archive and openly share their data.
Scopus : the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature
Scopus is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature: scientific journals, books and conference proceedings. Delivering a comprehensive overview of the world's research output in the fields of science, technology, medicine, social sciences, and arts and humanities, Scopus features smart tools to track, analyse and visualise research.
As research becomes increasingly global, interdisciplinary and collaborative, you can make sure that critical research from around the world is not missed when you choose Scopus.
Who's counting: an introduction to bibliometrics
Presentation from a University of York Library workshop on bibliometrics. The session covers how published research outputs are measured at the article, author and journal level; with discussion of the limitations of a bibliometric approach.
Scholarly impact metrics traditions
This document provides an overview of traditional scholarly impact metrics like citation count and impact factor, as well as new developments in altmetrics. It begins with an introduction to why citations are counted and the sources of citation data. It then discusses common metrics for measuring the impact of individuals, journals, and institutions. These include the h-index, journal impact factor, and global university rankings. The document also notes some limitations and issues with traditional metrics and outlines new areas of development in altmetrics.
Intro to altmetrics
Altmetrics provide alternative measures of impact beyond traditional citations by tracking attention on social media and other platforms. They can provide faster insights than citations, which take time to accumulate, and can measure impact on audiences beyond academics. However, altmetrics also have limitations as coverage varies by discipline and not all attention translates to citations or impact. Social media mentions have been shown to correlate with early citations and downloads, helping measure alternative concepts of impact.
MSc Biomedical Science Oct 2013
This document provides an overview of an introductory library skills session for an MSc in Biomedical Science program. It covers essential library resources like the library catalogue, Summon, and subject guides. It also covers literature searching skills like developing search strategies, using databases like Medline and Science Direct to find articles, and accessing full texts. Other topics covered include identifying peer-reviewed articles, comparing Google Scholar and Web of Science, and referencing.
Mining Research Publication Networks for Impact -- KMi Internal Seminar
This document discusses a PhD research project that aims to evaluate the quality of research publications. It outlines limitations of current peer review and bibliometric methods for evaluating quality. The research will analyze publication networks and full texts to identify factors influencing quality and develop new quality evaluation methods. The goals are to create metrics that are more accurate, understandable, resistant to manipulation and faster than citations. The research involves collecting publication data from various sources, analyzing networks and text, and developing composite metrics to estimate quality for different disciplines.
What's hot (20)
The Evolving Role of the Library in Institutional and Faculty Assessment
The Evolving Role of the Library in Institutional and Faculty Assessment
Alternative Avenues of Discovery: Competition or Potential
Alternative Avenues of Discovery: Competition or Potential
Access to Freely Available Journal Articles: Gold, Green, and Rogue Open Ac...
Access to Freely Available Journal Articles: Gold, Green, and Rogue Open Ac...
Scholarly Metrics Bootcamp USAIN 2014 Pre-conference workshop
Scholarly Metrics Bootcamp USAIN 2014 Pre-conference workshop
Bibliometrics and research impact workshop in the scienes and engineering fields
Bibliometrics and research impact workshop in the scienes and engineering fields
Data in Brief and Dataverse: Incentivizing Authors to Share Data by Paige Sha...
Data in Brief and Dataverse: Incentivizing Authors to Share Data by Paige Sha...
Scopus : the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature
Scopus : the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature
Mining Research Publication Networks for Impact -- KMi Internal Seminar
Mining Research Publication Networks for Impact -- KMi Internal Seminar
Viewers also liked
Preparing High School Students With Disabilities For College03
The document discusses preparing high school students with disabilities for college. It provides research-based objectives for college-bound students with special needs, including promoting effective learning strategies and self-determination skills. Models of memory and learning are reviewed. Disability laws requiring accommodations in higher education are also summarized. Successful traits of students with disabilities in college include utilizing support services and having awareness of their own learning abilities.
Commercial Serials Decision Support Systems
Slides to accompany an Oregon Library Association (OLA) / Washington Library Association (WLA) 2008 Joint Conference presentation on Commercial Serials Decision Support Systems.
Evidence Based Research for Social Workers
Slides accompanied a presentation at the National Association of Social Workers (NASW) - Oregon Chapter 2008 Conference.
Gold Miners And Gold Where Next Final
junior gold miners metanor gold-ore san gold stocks jaguar yamana barrick goldcorp newmont anglogold newcrest gold fields kinross polyus buenaventura
Commercial Serials Decision Support Systems
Commercial Serials Decision Support Databases (SDSDs) provide concise summaries of journal usage data to help with budgeting, collection development, and administrative reporting. Key features of SDSDs include analyzing user behavior, justifying budgets, and reducing staff workload. When choosing an SDSD, factors to consider include budget, staffing levels, type of needed analysis, and local collection needs. SDSDs can provide comparative holdings, usage statistics, package deal evaluations, resource sharing analyses, and gap/overlap assessments to support data-driven serials decisions. Current issues include incomplete publisher reports and lack of data integration, but future trends may include expanded analysis types and more customizable reporting tools.
Web traffic and campus trends: a multi-institution analysis
Ordinarily, it is difficult to generalize operational research conducted at one library to the environment of another. Different survey instruments, user populations, and sampling techniques make direct comparisons difficult. Despite these clear differences, libraries continue to use this literature to plan new services. There is a clear need to establish a baseline for comparison. The use of web server log statistical reports and other web analytics may offer this baseline. Such reports are now available to most libraries, and offer a rich, and consistent, look at library user behavior. This data tells a rich story about library use, and offers a valid point of comparison between institutions. The Orbis-Cascade Alliance Research Interest Group presents these initial results as our first collaborative effort. We argue that differences between institutional environments that have long been assumed are now clearly visible in simple metrics such as most-viewed pages, point-of-entry, and peak hours. These points of comparison are analyzed for three types of Alliance libraries: a public and a private four year residential campus, and an urban commuter university. The analysis offers empirical evidence of the commonalities and differences between these member libraries.
Topic 2 Innovation Models In The Services Driven Economy
ACPS 2010, Module 6, Services Innovation
Topic 2
Innovation Models in the Services Economy
Linear Vs Open/Collaborative/Dynamic Models of innovation
Viewers also liked (8)
Preparing High School Students With Disabilities For College03
Preparing High School Students With Disabilities For College03
Web traffic and campus trends: a multi-institution analysis
Web traffic and campus trends: a multi-institution analysis
Topic 2 Innovation Models In The Services Driven Economy
Topic 2 Innovation Models In The Services Driven Economy
Similar to Core Journals in Psychology: A Demonstration Project
Apa citations
This is my original APA citations PP that I created when 5th went to 6th. Much more tutorial based. Meant to be read on its own.
6025 22 Research Ppt
1. The study examined the correlation between citations from the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) database and citations from Google Scholar and Google Web for 1,650 journal articles across disciplines including sciences, social sciences, and computer science.
2. The results found significant correlations between ISI citations and Google Scholar and Google Web citations for many disciplines, though Google Scholar citations correlated more strongly with ISI citations.
3. There were also clear disciplinary differences in conventional and web-based citation patterns.
6025 2 Research Ppt
1) The study examined the correlation between citations from the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) database and citations from Google Scholar and Google Web for 1,650 journal articles across several disciplines.
2) The results showed significant correlations between ISI citations and Google Scholar and Google Web citations for many science and social science fields, though correlations were higher for Google Scholar than Google Web.
3) There were clear disciplinary differences found between conventional citation patterns in ISI and web-based citations in Google Scholar and Google Web.
Assignments for the First and Second Year
This document outlines assignments for first and second year students that build research and information literacy skills. The assignments include developing a search strategy, becoming familiar with major journals and reference works in their field, improving analysis skills, and learning citation mechanics. Some example assignments are developing a topic map and search statement, finding and analyzing journal articles on a topic using different databases, examining recent journals in their field, finding and analyzing sources on a topic from different reference materials, comparing how research is portrayed in popular media versus scholarly sources, and practicing writing annotated bibliographies and reference lists using proper citation formats.
bibliometrics for beginners
Presentation covering introduction to bibliometrics. Suggested audience: PGRs, early career researchers, academic staff wanting refresher, research support staff
Reviewing the Literature.pptx
The document discusses conducting a literature review and identifies six key steps:
1) Identify key terms to narrow the topic and pose a research question.
2) Locate relevant literature using academic libraries and databases from primary and secondary sources.
3) Evaluate and select high quality sources using criteria like peer review, author reputation, and standards of the publication.
4) Analyze, organize and synthesize the literature thematically to identify common ideas, differences, and gaps.
5) Interpret and explain the significance of the literature and how it informs the research problem.
6) Write the literature review to summarize and synthesize the literature thematically.
APA Class Presentation
This is an APA 6th edition citations presentation that I put together for library sessions. It is always changing. This is just one iteration.
Publishing and impact Wageningen University IL for PhD 20141202
This document provides information on publishing and metrics for impact. It discusses publishing articles and choosing journals, as well as different metrics for measuring impact at the article, author, journal, and research group levels. These include metrics like the h-index for authors and journal impact factors. It also provides information on bibliometric databases and analyzing citation data to calculate relative impact compared to baselines in different subject areas. Exercises are included to help readers practice applying these bibliometric concepts.
ICPSR Data Exploration Tools
This document provides an agenda and overview for a conference on data exploration, sharing, and management hosted by ICPSR. The first session will cover data exploration tools like ICPSR's integrated search engine and Social Science Variables Database. The second will discuss sharing 2010 US Census and other public data. The final session will address data management plans and computing/sharing in secure environments. ICPSR is one of the world's largest social science data archives, housing over 7,000 studies and 65,000 datasets. It seeks to facilitate research through data preservation, dissemination, and educational resources.
British Library
The document discusses using Web of Science and related databases to strengthen research discovery, assessment, and identification of producers of research. It outlines how the databases can be used to discover more relevant papers, assess the impact and performance of articles, authors, journals and institutions, and improve author identification. The document provides examples and screenshots related to searching topics, analyzing citation metrics, and identifying highly cited research.
Writing a Research - Part 1
The document provides an outline for writing a research proposal or thesis. It discusses selecting a topic and research approach, conducting a literature review, using theory, and writing strategies. For the research approach, it explains quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods. It emphasizes developing a literature review matrix and critically evaluating sources. For theory, it discusses using theory deductively in quantitative research and inductively in qualitative research. Finally, it provides examples of proposal formats and sections for quantitative and qualitative research, such as the introduction, methods, significance and ethical issues.
Challenging aspects of EBP.docx
This document discusses the challenging but essential process of formulating an evidence-based practice (EBP) question. It notes that developing a clear research question is crucial as it guides all other aspects of the research process. The document then provides guidance on using the PICOT framework to develop EBP questions, focusing on identifying an issue or problem, generating multiple questions, and selecting the most appropriate one based on significance, feasibility, and interest. It describes analyzing the question to determine relevant PICOT elements - patient population, intervention, comparison, and outcome. Finally, it discusses generating keywords that could be used in a literature search to investigate the question.
Project Course Project Part 1—Identifying a Researchable Problem.docx
Project: Course Project: Part 1—Identifying a Researchable Problem
One of the most challenging aspects of EBP is to actually identify the answerable question.
—Karen Sue Davies
Formulating a question that targets the goal of your research is a challenging but essential task. The question plays a crucial role in all other aspects of the research, including the determination of the research design and theoretical perspective to be applied, which data will be collected, and which tools will be used for analysis. It is therefore essential to take the time to ensure that the research question addresses what you actually want to study. Doing so will increase your likelihood of obtaining meaningful results.
In this first component of the Course Project, you formulate questions to address a particular nursing issue or problem. You use the PICOT model—patient/population, intervention/issue, comparison, and outcome—outlined in the Learning Resources to design your questions.
To prepare:
Review the article,
“Formulating the Evidence Based Practice Question: A Review of the Frameworks,”
found in the Learning Resources for this week. Focus on the PICOT model for guiding the development of research questions.
Review the section beginning on page 75 of the course text, titled, “Developing and Refining Research Problems” in the course text
,( Marquis & Huston) which focuses on analyzing the feasibility of a research problem.
Reflect on an issue or problem that you have noticed in your nursing practice. Consider the significance of this issue or problem.
(Refer to the PICOT question you earlier formulated for me on handwashing)
Generate at
least five questions
that relate to the issue which you have identified. Use the criteria in your course text to select one question that would be most appropriate in terms of significance, feasibility, and interest.
Be prepared to explain your rationale
.
Formulate a preliminary PICO question—one that is answerable—based on your analysis. What are the PICO variables (patient/population, intervention/issue, comparison, and outcome) for this question? (once again refer to the PICO question you earlier formulated for me on:
Does hand washing and appropriate staff dressing among the surgical ward nurses reduce cross infection during patient management)
Note:
Not all of these variables may be appropriate to every question. Be sure to analyze which are and are not relevant to your specific question.
Using the PICOT variables that you determined for your question,
develop a list of at least 10 keywords that could be used when conducting a literature search to investigate current research pertaining to the question.
To complete:
Write a
4-page paper that includes the following:
(1) A summary of your area of interest, an identification of the problem that you have selected, and an explanation of the significance of this problem for nursing practice
(2) The 5 questions you have generated and a description of how .
Bibliometrics and University Rankings
A combination of powerpoint presentations on bibliometrics in higher education, originally presented at (CONCERT) Council on Core Electronic Resources in Taiwan, November 2008 and modified for a paper on bibliometrics and university rankings.
http://ir.library.smu.edu.sg/record=d1010558
Open Access Publishing: More Readers, More Impact
Open Access Publishing: More Readers, More ImpactWestern New York/Ontario Chapter Association of College and Research Libraries
This document discusses open access publishing and citation metrics. It argues that open access articles have more readers and citations than articles behind paywalls, citing research showing an open access citation advantage of 25-250%. It provides an overview of citation indexes and metrics like the h-index and g-index. The document recommends that scholars publish in open access journals or repositories when possible to enlarge their audience and impact. Overall it promotes the benefits of open access for both readers and scholars.Journal Metrics: The Impact Factor and Everything Else
The document discusses various metrics used to evaluate journals and authors, including the Impact Factor, h-index, and Eigenfactor. It describes what each metric measures, how it is calculated, and its advantages and limitations. In particular, it notes that the Impact Factor only looks at citations over a two year period, while the Eigenfactor and SJR take a longer, five year view and weight citations differently based on the influence of the citing journal. For authors, the h-index and its variants aim to capture both productivity and citation impact, but have limitations such as field differences and inability to decrease over time.
Bms Lit Searching
This document provides guidance on how to effectively search for and use biomedical literature. It outlines key biomedical databases like Medline and Science Direct that contain bibliographic details and full text journal articles. It also discusses developing an effective search strategy by breaking questions into concepts and alternative terms. The document stresses evaluating search results and describes peer review as the quality control process for academic research. Finally, it provides tips on accessing resources, referencing works cited, and getting help from library staff.
Research impact metrics for librarians: calculation & context
This document summarizes a presentation about research impact metrics for librarians. It discusses various metrics for measuring research impact, including the h-index, g-index, and altmetrics. It explains how the h-index and g-index are calculated using examples. It also discusses limitations of citation-based metrics and the importance of using a "basket of metrics" to provide context. The presentation emphasizes using appropriate metrics depending on the level of analysis (article, author, or journal) and considering factors like career stage and field of research. It provides information on data sources for different metrics and principles for evaluating research performance.
From Curiosity to Concept: Developing a Research Plan from Everyday Library I...
Slides I presented as part of ALCTS Virtual Preconference “The How and Why of Research: What Is the Rock in Your Shoe?,” 2012.
Tutorial on Final Year Project for ESE Students
The document provides guidance for engineering students on conducting research and using library resources for their final year projects. It outlines the research process, suggests starting by checking with supervisors and using the library's resources like LINC and subject guides to discover relevant literature. It also covers locating materials both with and without initial readings, understanding citations, copyright issues, and getting help from librarians.
Similar to Core Journals in Psychology: A Demonstration Project (20)
Publishing and impact Wageningen University IL for PhD 20141202
Publishing and impact Wageningen University IL for PhD 20141202
Project Course Project Part 1—Identifying a Researchable Problem.docx
Project Course Project Part 1—Identifying a Researchable Problem.docx
Journal Metrics: The Impact Factor and Everything Else
Journal Metrics: The Impact Factor and Everything Else
Research impact metrics for librarians: calculation & context
Research impact metrics for librarians: calculation & context
From Curiosity to Concept: Developing a Research Plan from Everyday Library I...
From Curiosity to Concept: Developing a Research Plan from Everyday Library I...
Recently uploaded
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRM
Odoo 17 CRM allows us to track why we lose sales opportunities with "Lost Reasons." This helps analyze our sales process and identify areas for improvement. Here's how to configure lost reasons in Odoo 17 CRM
Digital Artifact 1 - 10VCD Environments Unit
Digital Artifact 1 - 10VCD Environments Unit - NGV Pavilion Concept Design
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
Odoo provides an option for creating a module by using a single line command. By using this command the user can make a whole structure of a module. It is very easy for a beginner to make a module. There is no need to make each file manually. This slide will show how to create a module using the scaffold method.
How to Add Chatter in the odoo 17 ERP Module
In Odoo, the chatter is like a chat tool that helps you work together on records. You can leave notes and track things, making it easier to talk with your team and partners. Inside chatter, all communication history, activity, and changes will be displayed.
clinical examination of hip joint (1).pdf
described clinical examination all orthopeadic conditions .
The Diamonds of 2023-2024 in the IGRA collection
A review of the growth of the Israel Genealogy Research Association Database Collection for the last 12 months. Our collection is now passed the 3 million mark and still growing. See which archives have contributed the most. See the different types of records we have, and which years have had records added. You can also see what we have for the future.
Advanced Java[Extra Concepts, Not Difficult].docx
This is part 2 of my Java Learning Journey. This contains Hashing, ArrayList, LinkedList, Date and Time Classes, Calendar Class and more.
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
https://app.box.com/s/y977uz6bpd3af4qsebv7r9b7s21935vdExecutive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Let’s explore the intersection of technology and equity in the final session of our DEI series. Discover how AI tools, like ChatGPT, can be used to support and enhance your nonprofit's DEI initiatives. Participants will gain insights into practical AI applications and get tips for leveraging technology to advance their DEI goals.
The History of Stoke Newington Street Names
Presented at the Stoke Newington Literary Festival on 9th June 2024
www.StokeNewingtonHistory.com
Hindi varnamala | hindi alphabet PPT.pdf
हिंदी वर्णमाला पीपीटी, hindi alphabet PPT presentation, hindi varnamala PPT, Hindi Varnamala pdf, हिंदी स्वर, हिंदी व्यंजन, sikhiye hindi varnmala, dr. mulla adam ali, hindi language and literature, hindi alphabet with drawing, hindi alphabet pdf, hindi varnamala for childrens, hindi language, hindi varnamala practice for kids, https://www.drmullaadamali.com
Recently uploaded (20)
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRM
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRM
Digital Artefact 1 - Tiny Home Environmental Design
Digital Artefact 1 - Tiny Home Environmental Design
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
Liberal Approach to the Study of Indian Politics.pdf
Liberal Approach to the Study of Indian Politics.pdf
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion