7. G(dB)=10 log - (G ) dB - 20 log dB
Where Pt and Pr are transmitted and
pyramidal antenna and receiving antenna under test.
4.2. Nanofilm Patch Antenna characterization
The variation of return loss and frequency is shown in figure 8.
that, the antenna resonates at 5.64 GHz
calculated bandwidth is found to be 810 MHz
radiation patterns are measured at 5.64 GHz frequency.
5.64 GHz is shown in figure 8, right side.
is found to be 13.59 dB. The results are summarized
Figure 8: Left: Variation of RL vs. f
Table 1: Experimental result for f
Antenna Type fr (GHz)
Bulk 5.79
Nanofilm 5.64
5. DISCUSSION
(2)
-polar and cross polar
in H-plane at
n The measured results for resonant frequency, return loss, bandwidth and gain are presented in
Table 1. As shown in the Table 1
the simulated and experimental value
may be attributed to the nanofilm fabrication process tolerances. Since the little change in
dimensions along the length of the antenna
nanofilm antenna shows good 50
compared to bulk patch antenna.
56.79 % more over bulk patch antenna. This increase in bandwidth
resistance of the film around 100 nm.
depth sk = 2/μ (skin depth: 0.871 micron at 5.64 GHz)
function of thickness t [7], compounded by the doubling of the surface resistance.
the surface resistance decreases ‘Q’ of the antenna a
78
t
t
received power, R is the distance between transmitting
The peak gain is found to be 16 dB.
From this figure it is seen
for a return loss of -37.58 dB. From equation (1) the
or 14.36%. Similarly, co-radiation
Measured radiation pattern
The peak gain for nanofilm is calculated from equation (2)
in Table 1.
fr; and Right: Radiation pattern at 5.64 GHz frequency
fr, RL, BW and gain of bulk patch and nanofilm antenna
RL (-dB) BW (MHz) BW (%)
13.84 350 6.00
37.54 810 14.36
1, the copper nanofilm patch antenna resonates at 5.64 GHz against
values of bulk patch antenna. The difference in resonant frequency
may change slight variation in resonant frequency.
impedance matching between feedline and ultra thin pat
. Similarly the impedance bandwidth of nanofilm patch antenna is
is attributed to higher surface
When metal depositions on FR4 substrate are thinner than skin
GHz), the surface resistance increases
], and thereby increasing the bandwidth.
, Gain (dB)
16.08
13.59
, mask
The
patch
idth s as a
This doubling of
nd Thin film