Cooperative Learning


 Ideas for
 Effective
 Classroom
 Practice
Cooperative Learning
   in the Physics Classroom
The presentation is based upon the “Learning
Together” model developed by Johnson, D.,
Johnson, R. & Holubec, E. (1988). Circles of
Learning: Cooperation in the Classroom.
Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
Several other models exist (e.g., Slavin), but
the above model is perhaps the most
applicable to physics teaching.
Cooperative Learning
  v. Other Forms of Learning
Cooperative learning is just one form of
classroom/student learning structure.
Other forms include:
 – Individualized (criterion-based grading system)
 – Competitive (norm-based grading system)
Cooperative learning is perhaps the most
important of the three types of learning
situations, yet it is the least used (<20% time).
Cooperative learning cf collaborative learning.
Cooperative Learning:
       Definitions & Traits
Cooperation -- working together to
accomplish shared goals
Cooperative Learning -- the instructional use
of small groups wherein students work
together to maximize their own and each
other’s learning
Common Elements:
 – shared learning goals -- desired future state in which the
   students demonstrate as a group and individually a
   mastery of the subject studied
 – goal structure -- specifies the ways in which students will
   interact with each other and the teacher during the
   instructional session
Not all group learning is
    cooperative learning.
groups arguing over divisive conflicts and
power struggles
a member sits quietly, too shy to participate
one member does the work, while the other
members talk about sports
no one does the work because the one who
normally works the hardest doesn’t want to
be a sucker
a more talented member may come up with all
the answers, dictate to the group, or work
separately, ignoring other group members
Effective Cooperation

…does not occur by chance.
…can not be based on the assumption
that all students possess good social
and learning skills.
…occurs when the essential
components required for each
cooperative activity are ensured.
Learning Together:
Essential Components
Positive Interdependence
Students have two responsibilities:
 – learn the assigned material
 – ensure that all members of the group learn the material
Each student should see his or her
contribution as essential for group success.
 – each student makes unique contribution
Interdependence occurs when students
cannot succeed unless all their group
members also succeed.
Structuring interdependence: common goal, joint
rewards, divided resources, complimentary roles
Individual Accountability

Teacher must assess (directly or indirectly)
how much effort each member is contributing
to the group’s work.
Teacher must provide feedback to groups and
individual students.
Teacher must help groups avoid redundant
efforts by members.
Teacher must ensure that every member is
responsible for the final outcome.
Group Processing
n.b: At the end of the process, students
reflect to determine which member actions
were helpful and which were harmful.
Students then make decisions about which
actions to continue, change, or delete.
Such processing allows groups to:
 –   focus on maintaining good working relationships.
 –   learn and improve cooperative skills.
 –   provide feedback on member participation.
 –   think at a metacognitive level as well as cognitive level.
 –   celebrate success of the group.
Social Skills

Students must get to know and trust one
another.
Students must communicate accurately and
unambiguously.
Students must accept and support each
other.
Students must resolve conflicts
constructively.
Face-to-Face Interaction
Successful interaction occurs as a result of
positive interdependence.
To maximize opportunity for success:
 – keep groups small (2 - 6 students)
 – keep groups heterogeneous within, homogeneous without
 – assist students with guidelines for interaction:
     • acceptance, support, trust, respect
     • exchange of information
     • motivation
What’s the difference?
Cooperative Group               Traditional Group

Positive interdependence        No interdependence
Individual accountability       No individual accountability
Heterogeneous membership        Homogeneous membership
Shared leadership               One leader
Responsible to each other       Responsibly only for self
Task & maintenance emphasized   Only task emphasized
Social skills directly taught   Skills assumed or ignored
Teacher observes & intervenes   Teacher ignores groups
Group processing occurs         No group processing
Mutual assistance               Competitive
The Advisability of Using
    Cooperative Learning

Works well with inquiry and constructivist
approaches.
Supports multiculturalism efforts.
Promotes social development.
Assists with classroom discipline.
Provides for more than one “teacher.”
Cooperative Learning

Cooperative learning has the best and largest
empirical base of any educational innovation.
Cooperative processes have been shown to
advance higher-level conceptual learning.
Cooperative learning at the high school level
is well worth exploring.
A fad (top down) or a trend (bottom up)?
A Working Example
View the UHS videotape relating to cooperative
learning, “Is energy conserved?”
Read the article, Nondirected Research Projects
in Physics Coursework, The Physics Teacher, Vol.
34, March 1996, pp. 158 - 161.
Each student is free to write responses to
questions provided under Cooperative Learning
Lesson Analysis hyperlinked through Cooperative
Learning in course syllabus.

Cooperative Learning

  • 1.
    Cooperative Learning Ideasfor Effective Classroom Practice
  • 2.
    Cooperative Learning in the Physics Classroom The presentation is based upon the “Learning Together” model developed by Johnson, D., Johnson, R. & Holubec, E. (1988). Circles of Learning: Cooperation in the Classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company. Several other models exist (e.g., Slavin), but the above model is perhaps the most applicable to physics teaching.
  • 3.
    Cooperative Learning v. Other Forms of Learning Cooperative learning is just one form of classroom/student learning structure. Other forms include: – Individualized (criterion-based grading system) – Competitive (norm-based grading system) Cooperative learning is perhaps the most important of the three types of learning situations, yet it is the least used (<20% time). Cooperative learning cf collaborative learning.
  • 4.
    Cooperative Learning: Definitions & Traits Cooperation -- working together to accomplish shared goals Cooperative Learning -- the instructional use of small groups wherein students work together to maximize their own and each other’s learning Common Elements: – shared learning goals -- desired future state in which the students demonstrate as a group and individually a mastery of the subject studied – goal structure -- specifies the ways in which students will interact with each other and the teacher during the instructional session
  • 5.
    Not all grouplearning is cooperative learning. groups arguing over divisive conflicts and power struggles a member sits quietly, too shy to participate one member does the work, while the other members talk about sports no one does the work because the one who normally works the hardest doesn’t want to be a sucker a more talented member may come up with all the answers, dictate to the group, or work separately, ignoring other group members
  • 6.
    Effective Cooperation …does notoccur by chance. …can not be based on the assumption that all students possess good social and learning skills. …occurs when the essential components required for each cooperative activity are ensured.
  • 7.
  • 8.
    Positive Interdependence Students havetwo responsibilities: – learn the assigned material – ensure that all members of the group learn the material Each student should see his or her contribution as essential for group success. – each student makes unique contribution Interdependence occurs when students cannot succeed unless all their group members also succeed. Structuring interdependence: common goal, joint rewards, divided resources, complimentary roles
  • 9.
    Individual Accountability Teacher mustassess (directly or indirectly) how much effort each member is contributing to the group’s work. Teacher must provide feedback to groups and individual students. Teacher must help groups avoid redundant efforts by members. Teacher must ensure that every member is responsible for the final outcome.
  • 10.
    Group Processing n.b: Atthe end of the process, students reflect to determine which member actions were helpful and which were harmful. Students then make decisions about which actions to continue, change, or delete. Such processing allows groups to: – focus on maintaining good working relationships. – learn and improve cooperative skills. – provide feedback on member participation. – think at a metacognitive level as well as cognitive level. – celebrate success of the group.
  • 11.
    Social Skills Students mustget to know and trust one another. Students must communicate accurately and unambiguously. Students must accept and support each other. Students must resolve conflicts constructively.
  • 12.
    Face-to-Face Interaction Successful interactionoccurs as a result of positive interdependence. To maximize opportunity for success: – keep groups small (2 - 6 students) – keep groups heterogeneous within, homogeneous without – assist students with guidelines for interaction: • acceptance, support, trust, respect • exchange of information • motivation
  • 13.
    What’s the difference? CooperativeGroup Traditional Group Positive interdependence No interdependence Individual accountability No individual accountability Heterogeneous membership Homogeneous membership Shared leadership One leader Responsible to each other Responsibly only for self Task & maintenance emphasized Only task emphasized Social skills directly taught Skills assumed or ignored Teacher observes & intervenes Teacher ignores groups Group processing occurs No group processing Mutual assistance Competitive
  • 14.
    The Advisability ofUsing Cooperative Learning Works well with inquiry and constructivist approaches. Supports multiculturalism efforts. Promotes social development. Assists with classroom discipline. Provides for more than one “teacher.”
  • 15.
    Cooperative Learning Cooperative learninghas the best and largest empirical base of any educational innovation. Cooperative processes have been shown to advance higher-level conceptual learning. Cooperative learning at the high school level is well worth exploring. A fad (top down) or a trend (bottom up)?
  • 16.
    A Working Example Viewthe UHS videotape relating to cooperative learning, “Is energy conserved?” Read the article, Nondirected Research Projects in Physics Coursework, The Physics Teacher, Vol. 34, March 1996, pp. 158 - 161. Each student is free to write responses to questions provided under Cooperative Learning Lesson Analysis hyperlinked through Cooperative Learning in course syllabus.