The document compares alternatively certified teachers (who received alternative certification) and traditionally prepared teachers (who received traditional certification). It discusses that the study uses qualitative research methods to explore issues around these two groups of teachers and answer questions about them. The study also involves collecting data through surveys and sampling to estimate characteristics of the larger populations.
60, Li, comparing quality assurance mechanisms for student learning outcomes ...pochun Li
Â
This article is an ongoing doctoral research and it aims to compare academicsâ perceptions of quality assurance mechanisms for ensuring undergraduate student learning outcomes between Taiwan and England. Since 2012, the Foundation for Higher Education Evaluation and Accreditation Council of Taiwan (2013) has been conducting the second 5-year cycle of higher education evaluation. The aim of this evaluation is to examine the mechanisms and practice of each department and graduate school for ensuring their student learning outcomes. The issue of student learning outcomes is an important trend in the global higher education, but some challenges must be dealt with in Taiwan during the processes of policy borrowing (Phillips, 2009) since the new policy mainly refers experience to the UKâs quality assurance and the USâs accreditation systems. The primary challenges are the construction and implementation of the quality assurance mechanisms for learning outcomes in each university, and it has been argued that some implicit and non-cognitive learning outcomes are difficult to assess (Chen, 2013).
The empirical research is a comparative case study involving two purposively selected universities in England and Taiwan. In-depth, semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 10 academics in each country. Most participants work in the field of education and they are at the different levels- university, faculty and department. It is supposed that academicsâ perceptions could be different between the two countries, and academics within the same university could differ in their viewpoints on this issue. Also, public meeting minutes and internal quality assurance policies about student learning outcomes within the two universities were analysed.
The initial findings of this study will be presented and discussed, including the similarities and differences of quality assurance mechanisms for ensuring learning outcomes between the two countries. Another focus of discussion will be on academicsâ positive and negative perceptions of the implementation and influences of the mechanisms and their suggestions for the improvements of the systems.
60, Li, comparing quality assurance mechanisms for student learning outcomes ...pochun Li
Â
This article is an ongoing doctoral research and it aims to compare academicsâ perceptions of quality assurance mechanisms for ensuring undergraduate student learning outcomes between Taiwan and England. Since 2012, the Foundation for Higher Education Evaluation and Accreditation Council of Taiwan (2013) has been conducting the second 5-year cycle of higher education evaluation. The aim of this evaluation is to examine the mechanisms and practice of each department and graduate school for ensuring their student learning outcomes. The issue of student learning outcomes is an important trend in the global higher education, but some challenges must be dealt with in Taiwan during the processes of policy borrowing (Phillips, 2009) since the new policy mainly refers experience to the UKâs quality assurance and the USâs accreditation systems. The primary challenges are the construction and implementation of the quality assurance mechanisms for learning outcomes in each university, and it has been argued that some implicit and non-cognitive learning outcomes are difficult to assess (Chen, 2013).
The empirical research is a comparative case study involving two purposively selected universities in England and Taiwan. In-depth, semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 10 academics in each country. Most participants work in the field of education and they are at the different levels- university, faculty and department. It is supposed that academicsâ perceptions could be different between the two countries, and academics within the same university could differ in their viewpoints on this issue. Also, public meeting minutes and internal quality assurance policies about student learning outcomes within the two universities were analysed.
The initial findings of this study will be presented and discussed, including the similarities and differences of quality assurance mechanisms for ensuring learning outcomes between the two countries. Another focus of discussion will be on academicsâ positive and negative perceptions of the implementation and influences of the mechanisms and their suggestions for the improvements of the systems.
Dr. Jennifer T. Butcher, Dissertation Defense & Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
Dr. Jennifer T. Butcher is currently an Assistant Professor at the University of Texas Pan American.
Dr. Jennifer T. Butcher, Dissertation Defense & Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair
Dr. Jennifer T. Butcher is currently an Assistant Professor at the University of Texas Pan American.
Dr. Jennifer T. Butcher, PhD Dissertation Defense, Dr. William Allan Kritsoni...William Kritsonis
Â
Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, PhD Dissertation Chair for Dr. Jennifer T. Butcher, PhD Program in Educational Leadership, PVAMU, Member of the Texas A&M University System.
Webinar given for the Institute for Competency-based Education March 2019 discussing the demographic composition of competency-based education learners, their enrollment motivators and their college choice process.
Counternarratives and HBCU Student Success - NASPA 3.24.15saUGA411
Â
A presentation by student affairs scholar practitioners that highlights the work done on a mixed methods research study exploring student success at HBCUs.
Holistic Review in Graduate Admissions: What we need to KnowJulia Michaels
Â
The pathway to becoming a scientist leads through graduate school, and graduate admissions committees are the gatekeepers. This webinar will, co-hosted by the Council of Graduate Schools (CGS), the Coalition of Urban Serving Universities (USU), and the Association of Public and Land-grant Universities (APLU), will explore existing evidence for holistic review in graduate admissions and critical gaps in evidence that need to be addressed before implementing the practice broadly across programs.
How to Create Map Views in the Odoo 17 ERPCeline George
Â
The map views are useful for providing a geographical representation of data. They allow users to visualize and analyze the data in a more intuitive manner.
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptxEduSkills OECD
Â
Andreas Schleicher presents at the OECD webinar âDigital devices in schools: detrimental distraction or secret to success?â on 27 May 2024. The presentation was based on findings from PISA 2022 results and the webinar helped launch the PISA in Focus âManaging screen time: How to protect and equip students against distractionâ https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/managing-screen-time_7c225af4-en and the OECD Education Policy Perspective âStudents, digital devices and successâ can be found here - https://oe.cd/il/5yV
This is a presentation by Dada Robert in a Your Skill Boost masterclass organised by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan (EFSS) on Saturday, the 25th and Sunday, the 26th of May 2024.
He discussed the concept of quality improvement, emphasizing its applicability to various aspects of life, including personal, project, and program improvements. He defined quality as doing the right thing at the right time in the right way to achieve the best possible results and discussed the concept of the "gap" between what we know and what we do, and how this gap represents the areas we need to improve. He explained the scientific approach to quality improvement, which involves systematic performance analysis, testing and learning, and implementing change ideas. He also highlighted the importance of client focus and a team approach to quality improvement.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
Â
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
Â
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Comparson with Alternatively and Traditionally Prepared Teachers
1. A Comparison of Alternatively
and Traditionally Prepared
Teachers
John W. Miller
Florida State University
Michael C. Mckenna
Georgia Southern University
Beverly A.Mckenna
Georigia Southern University
2. Qualitative Research
What is Qualitative Research?
⢠It is exploring issues, understanding
phenomena and answering questions.
8. In statistics, quality assurance, and survey
methodology, sampling is concerned with the selection of a
subset of individuals from within a statistical population to
estimate characteristics of the whole population. Acceptance
sampling is used to determine if a production lot of material
meets the governing specifications. Two advantages of sampling
are that the cost is lower and data collection is faster than
measuring the entire population.
9.
10. Submitted to:
Prof. Agnes Montalbo
Rizal Technological University
Submitted by:
Fondales, Ma.Pasadena C.
