Comparative Study of Software Packages for ERP Implementation
•
1 like•1,993 views
Comparative Study of Software Packages for ERP Implementation (DBMS and Application Servers) C.R.I.S. ( Centre for Railway Information Systems )
![Company Profile ,[object Object],IT Consultancy to Indian Railways R&D efforts to modernize railways Projects Freight Operation Information System (FOIS) Passenger Reservation System Payroll System Financial Accounting System Unreserved Ticketing System Crew Management System]()
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (16)
Viewers also liked
Viewers also liked (20)
Similar to Comparative Study of Software Packages for ERP Implementation
Similar to Comparative Study of Software Packages for ERP Implementation (20)
More from Gagan Bhalla - ITIL®, CSM®
More from Gagan Bhalla - ITIL®, CSM® (16)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Comparative Study of Software Packages for ERP Implementation
- 1. Comparative Study of Software Packages for ERP Implementation(DBMS and Application Servers)@C.R.I.S.( Centre for Railway Information Systems ) Gagan Bhalla (0341189907) External Guide Pradeep Kumar GM-WISE CRIS, New Delhi Internal Guide Nidhish Shroti ERP Consultant CDAC, NOIDA
- 5. Improve maintenance based decision making
- 6. Minimize the paper work
- 7. Setup easy to access Technical Reference Library
- 10. Objective Comparative study Software packages demanded Recommend Optimal
- 11. Scope In Scope Technical Comparison Database Oracle 10g Enterprise Edition IBM DB2 v9.0 UDB Application Server IBM WebSphere 6.1 Network Deployment Edition SAP NetWeaver 7.0
- 12. Limitations Experience Availability of Enterprise products
- 13. Plan of work
- 14. Data Collection White papers Research Papers Suggestions / Consultation with people working in the industry emails, LinkedIn and other similar Social Networking websites Benchmarks performed by recognized institutions and organizations.
- 15. Tools & Techniques Interviews Expert Consultation & Feedbacks Benchmarks Checklist Microsoft Word Microsoft PowerPoint Microsoft Project
- 18. Scalability
- 19. Performance
- 20. Availability
- 21. ManageabilitySources White Papers Benchmarking Standards Research Documents Consulting Experts
- 23. Oracle technically strong with Grid (but at additional cost)
- 24. IBM DB2 lagged GRID support
- 26. Performance
- 27. Oracle leaded with performance at lower infrastructure
- 28. Persistent performance at even high scalability
- 29. Oracle provides partitioning (but at additional cost)
- 30. Availability
- 31. Oracle provided exceptional measures for ensuring High availability
- 32. IBM DB2 provided support (but at additional cost)
- 33. Manageability
- 38. Package Contents
- 39. Integration OptionsSources White Papers Official Websites
- 41. Both WebSphere and NetWeaver came at par which each other,
- 42. Both supported latest standards, Java compatibility and extensive Web Services support
- 43. Package Contents
- 46. Mobile
- 48. NetWeaver leaded here too, providing integrating with Microsoft .NET Framework which WebSphere laggedESR (Enterprise Service Repository) of pre-built industry solutions ready to plug and play.
- 49. Conclusion Oracle 3 out of 4 points were in favor of Oracle 2 out 4 Consultants Supported Oracle, 1 Supported DB2, 1 was neutral NetWeaver 2 out of 3 points were in favor of SAP NetWeaver CRIS already using IBM WebSphere Public portal => More comfortable
- 50. References Company / Product Websites Oracle IBM SAP Product Technical Documentation Transaction Processing Council (TPC) NetWeaver for Dummies
Editor's Notes
- A very good morning to everyone.I’m here to give presentation on my “Summer Training“ which was successfully completed at C.R.I.S., (Chanakya Puri, New Delhi) under the guidance of Mr. Pradeep Kr. my external guide and Mr. Nidhish Shroti my Internal Guide.The topic of training was Comparative Study of Software Packages for ERP Implementation which consisted of DBMS & Application Servers.
- First of all, about C.R.I.S. where I did my training. Centre for Railway Information System has its office at Chanakya Puri, New Delhi.…
- In January 2008 C.R.I.S. introduced Tender.The Tender talked about implementing an Integrated Solution which would automate several procedures for Locomotives Maintenance at Sheds.The key features of the solutions are - …
- The solution would consists of following high-level modules…WISE-II : Workshop Information Management System – Phase II
- The objective of the training was to do a Comparative Study among Software Packages demanded as per the tender document to implement ERP/EAM based solution, and to recommend the optimal one among compared.
- The scope of training was constrained to Technical Comparison. The Software packages compared were …
- Availability of Credible Resources was one factor, the sources were carefully chosen for the study. The implementation of a solution of such a level requires years extensive experience, which I lacked. Enterprise Products are not available for the use.
- The plan of work was carried out as shown .. The study of relevant information from the tender document was the first step in the plan of work.Data Gathering was next on the plan of work and one of the longest activity. While Interview/Expert consultation took only 3 days.Analysis & Report compilation were next on the plan.Report Submission was the last and took the least time.
- No specific Research Methodology was followed!Summer Training was a study and therefore no specific research methodology was applicable.
- Following are the tools & techniques that were used during the training.
- This section is focused on Results of Comparative Study.
- The first section of Comparative Study is Database. Two Products were taken into consideration – Oracle Database & IBM’s DB2.S-P-A-M were considered as comparative parameters.The main source of Study for DBMS were
- The next section of Comparative Study is Application Server. Two Products were taken into consideration – SAP NetWeaver & IBM WebSphere.T-P-I were considered as Comparative Parameters. Sources of Information were majorly White Papers & Official Websites.