Clinical Trials
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
1 like•235 views
This document provides an overview of clinical trials, including definitions, types of research, ethics considerations, trial design, and data management and analysis. It defines clinical trials as research studies that prospectively assign participants to interventions to evaluate health outcomes. Key points include that clinical trials have various phases and are regulated by organizations like the WHO, NIH, and IRB to ensure ethics standards around informed consent and protecting vulnerable groups. Randomization and control groups are discussed as important design aspects, as is the role of sponsors. Data collection, grading scales, statistical analysis, and presenting results are covered as important parts of the research process.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Why Do We Need Clinical Trials?
Providing a course that is relevant, practical and patient-centered that will positively impact the speed in which entry-level oncology specialists integrate into the oncology practice setting.
Evidence based medicine
This document discusses evidence-based medicine (EBM). It defines EBM as integrating the best available clinical research with individual expertise and patient values. EBM involves using a hierarchy of evidence, with randomized controlled trials considered the gold standard, to make informed healthcare decisions. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses also provide high-level evidence by comprehensively analyzing available studies. The key aspects of EBM are asking questions, acquiring evidence, appraising studies, applying evidence to individual cases, and assessing outcomes. EBM aims to optimize patient care through minimizing errors and reducing costs by ensuring treatment is based on the most valid and applicable research available.
Research protocol writting
This document outlines the components and content of a research protocol. It discusses including a title, abstract, introduction/objectives, literature review, methodology, references, and ethics considerations. The methodology section should describe the study design, variables, measurements, subjects/participants, sample size calculation, and data analysis plan. Developing a thorough protocol is important to clarify the research question, compile existing knowledge, decide on a study design, and apply for funding. It provides a guide for investigators to arrive at comparable conclusions.
The ethics of clinical trials
This is a lecture on ethical issues related to clinical trials. It is for Module 4 of an online Medical Ethics course I am teaching at BGSU.
Levels of irb review july 16 2019
This document discusses the different levels of review by an Institutional Review Board (IRB). It outlines that IRBs are responsible for protecting the rights and welfare of research subjects. There are three levels of IRB review: exempt, expedited, and full-board. Exempt review involves minimal risk studies that fit defined categories. Expedited review also involves minimal risk but fits categories allowing for a streamlined review process. Full-board review is required for studies involving more than minimal risk.
Research protocol
This document outlines the key components of a research protocol, including identifying a health problem, formulating research questions and objectives, planning data collection and analysis, and drawing conclusions. It discusses that a research protocol provides a formal written plan and blueprint for conducting research. The major sections covered are introduction, research question/hypothesis, objectives, review of literature, materials and methods, sample size calculation, data collection plan, data analysis plan, implementation plan, ethical considerations, timeline, and references. The goal of a protocol is to clarify the research question and design a scientifically sound methodology to properly address the question.
# 5th lect clinical trial process
This document outlines the key steps in conducting a clinical trial:
1. Drawing up a detailed research protocol that serves as the trial's operating manual.
2. Selecting and screening participants according to eligibility criteria to identify the study population. Sample size is also calculated.
3. Randomly allocating the study participants into experimental and control groups through a process like randomization to reduce bias.
Introduction to outcomes research
Health outcomes research is seen as a cost-effective investment in measuring and defining value of new innovations in health care. We provide an overview of field and its applications
Recommended
Why Do We Need Clinical Trials?
Providing a course that is relevant, practical and patient-centered that will positively impact the speed in which entry-level oncology specialists integrate into the oncology practice setting.
Evidence based medicine
This document discusses evidence-based medicine (EBM). It defines EBM as integrating the best available clinical research with individual expertise and patient values. EBM involves using a hierarchy of evidence, with randomized controlled trials considered the gold standard, to make informed healthcare decisions. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses also provide high-level evidence by comprehensively analyzing available studies. The key aspects of EBM are asking questions, acquiring evidence, appraising studies, applying evidence to individual cases, and assessing outcomes. EBM aims to optimize patient care through minimizing errors and reducing costs by ensuring treatment is based on the most valid and applicable research available.
Research protocol writting
This document outlines the components and content of a research protocol. It discusses including a title, abstract, introduction/objectives, literature review, methodology, references, and ethics considerations. The methodology section should describe the study design, variables, measurements, subjects/participants, sample size calculation, and data analysis plan. Developing a thorough protocol is important to clarify the research question, compile existing knowledge, decide on a study design, and apply for funding. It provides a guide for investigators to arrive at comparable conclusions.
The ethics of clinical trials
This is a lecture on ethical issues related to clinical trials. It is for Module 4 of an online Medical Ethics course I am teaching at BGSU.
Levels of irb review july 16 2019
This document discusses the different levels of review by an Institutional Review Board (IRB). It outlines that IRBs are responsible for protecting the rights and welfare of research subjects. There are three levels of IRB review: exempt, expedited, and full-board. Exempt review involves minimal risk studies that fit defined categories. Expedited review also involves minimal risk but fits categories allowing for a streamlined review process. Full-board review is required for studies involving more than minimal risk.
Research protocol
This document outlines the key components of a research protocol, including identifying a health problem, formulating research questions and objectives, planning data collection and analysis, and drawing conclusions. It discusses that a research protocol provides a formal written plan and blueprint for conducting research. The major sections covered are introduction, research question/hypothesis, objectives, review of literature, materials and methods, sample size calculation, data collection plan, data analysis plan, implementation plan, ethical considerations, timeline, and references. The goal of a protocol is to clarify the research question and design a scientifically sound methodology to properly address the question.
# 5th lect clinical trial process
This document outlines the key steps in conducting a clinical trial:
1. Drawing up a detailed research protocol that serves as the trial's operating manual.
2. Selecting and screening participants according to eligibility criteria to identify the study population. Sample size is also calculated.
3. Randomly allocating the study participants into experimental and control groups through a process like randomization to reduce bias.
Introduction to outcomes research
Health outcomes research is seen as a cost-effective investment in measuring and defining value of new innovations in health care. We provide an overview of field and its applications
Research Methodology
Dr. Athar Khan
Associate Professor
Department of Community Medicine
Liaquat College of Medicine & Dentistry
Karachi, Pakistan
matharm@yahoo.com
Crb tech reviews on clinical research jobs
There are two main types of healthcare studies: clinical trials and observational studies. Clinical trials involve testing new medical treatments on human volunteers to evaluate safety and effectiveness compared to existing standard treatments or placebos. Researchers allocate specific treatments to participants and collect data on health outcomes. Observational studies observe health outcomes in groups of participants receiving routine medical care and treatments are not allocated by researchers. The goal of both is to generate evidence to inform healthcare decisions and advance medical knowledge.
Clinical Trial Protocol Review for Study Feasibility Analysis
How to review a clinical research protocol for study feasibility assessment and clinical trial management. .
Clinical trails
This document provides an overview of different study designs used in epidemiological research, including observational studies like case reports, case series, cross-sectional studies, case-control studies, cohort studies, and experimental studies like randomized controlled trials. It discusses the advantages and disadvantages of each design and how they are used to study disease etiology, risk factors, and effects of interventions. Key points covered include how observational studies do not involve manipulation of exposures but can establish associations, while experimental studies allow investigation of cause-and-effect through controlled manipulation of exposures.
Protocol Design & Development: What You Need to Know to Ensure a Successful S...
Solid protocol design is critical to clinical development. No matter how well executed a clinical study is, if the underlying design is flawed, it wasn’t worth doing. In this presentation, Dr. David Shoemaker, SVP R&D, and Dr. Karen Kesler, AVP Operations, will walk through the process of developing a protocol, explain the major considerations, and point out common mistakes and challenges.
COCHRANE OVERVIEW AND PRISMA STATEMENT
1. The meta-analysis found that concomitant chemoradiotherapy improved overall survival compared to sequential chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer, due to better locoregional control, though it increased acute esophageal toxicity.
2. Temozolomide improved survival and delayed progression compared to radiotherapy alone for glioblastoma, but increased early adverse events. For recurrent glioblastoma, temozolomide improved time to progression over standard chemotherapy.
3. Surgery for early cervical adenocarcinoma showed a benefit over radiotherapy in one RCT, but most operated patients required adjuvant radiotherapy with greater morbidity compared to chemoradiation.
Retrospective vs Prospective Study
Retrospective vs Prospective Study: Advantages, Types and Differences.
https://www.cognibrain.com/retrospective-vs-prospective-study-advantages-types-and-differences/
Protocol writing
DETAILS OF WRITING A PROTOCOL.
By Dr. Amreen Saba Attariya
Dept of Pharmacology
M.R.Medical college, Gulbarga-India
Evidence based nursing resources
This document provides an overview of evidence-based nursing practice and how to effectively search for and evaluate evidence. It defines evidence-based practice as using the best available evidence from research to improve clinical practice. A 5-step process is outlined: formulating a question, searching literature, critically appraising evidence, applying evidence to practice, and re-evaluating. Guidance is given on formulating search strategies using PICO and searching various library databases and resources like Cochrane and CINAHL to find relevant evidence to answer clinical questions.
evidence based medicine ( dr.moaweyah)
This document discusses evidence-based medicine and statistical significance. It defines evidence-based medicine as using current best evidence from sources like systematic reviews and meta-analyses to make decisions about patient care. The 5 A's process for practicing evidence-based medicine is outlined as asking questions, acquiring evidence, appraising evidence, applying to patients, and assessing outcomes. Different types of studies used in evidence-based medicine are described, including systematic reviews/meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies.
Clinical Trial Presentation-6.29.15-cg
This educational webcast discusses clinical trials and their role in advancing research for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). It provides an overview of the clinical trial process, including the different phases from pre-clinical research to FDA approval. Common features of IBD clinical trials are reviewed, such as endpoints of symptom improvement and reduction of inflammation. Resources for learning more about participating in clinical trials through organizations like CCFA and ResearchMatch are presented.
How to conduct a systematic review
This document provides an overview of how to conduct a systematic review. It begins by defining what a systematic review is and why they are important for evidence-based practice. It then outlines the key steps in conducting a systematic review, including formulating an answerable question using PICO(T), performing a comprehensive literature search, selecting studies and extracting data in an unbiased manner, critically appraising the evidence, and synthesizing the data. The document emphasizes that systematic reviews need to follow a structured, systematic process and make all methods explicit to minimize bias. It also discusses challenges that can arise in systematic reviews like database, publication, and language biases.
1-Halt-it Protocol International v1.0 26nov12
This document outlines the protocol for the HALT-IT clinical trial, which will determine the effects of tranexamic acid (TXA) on mortality, morbidity, and other outcomes in patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding. The trial will enroll 8,000 patients from hospitals worldwide in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design comparing intravenous TXA to placebo. The primary outcome is death within 28 days. Secondary outcomes include rebleeding, need for intervention, transfusion requirements, thrombotic events, and other complications. If shown to be effective and safe, TXA could significantly impact the management of gastrointestinal bleeding globally.
Levels of evidence, recommendations & phases of
This document discusses levels of evidence and phases of clinical trials. It defines evidence-based medicine as using current best evidence from systematic research to make decisions about patient care. Levels of evidence are ranked from 1A to 5 based on study design, with systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials ranked highest. Clinical trials progress through four phases to test safety, efficacy, and optimal use of new drugs or devices. Phase 1 assesses safety, phase 2 establishes efficacy, phase 3 confirms safety and efficacy in larger groups, and phase 4 studies monitor risks and benefits after marketing.
Assessing Clinical Research Infrastructure Needs
This report summarizes the results of a campus-wide survey initiative, conducted by the Southern California Clinical and Translational Science Institute (SC CTSI), focused on the development of a clinical data warehouse for research (CDWR) and a clinical trials management system (CTMS) as well as general barriers to conducting clinical research at the University of Southern California (USC) and Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA).
Learn more about SC CTSI http://www.sc-ctsi.org/
Assessing Applicability
Understanding applicability, also referred to as relevance, the extent to which published results are likely to reflect expected outcomes when an intervention is applied broadly across populations.
Evidence Based Practice - EBP
This document provides an overview of evidence-based practice (EBP) for speech and language pathologists. It defines EBP as integrating the best research evidence, clinical expertise, and client values and preferences. The 5 steps of EBP are discussed: 1) developing an answerable clinical question, 2) finding the evidence, 3) critically appraising the evidence, 4) making an informed clinical decision, and 5) evaluating and improving the process. Key aspects of each step like developing PICO questions, searching various sources of evidence, critically evaluating research quality, and incorporating client values are explained. The importance of reflection, communication, and applying EBP principles in clinical practice is emphasized.
Clinical trial regulations for clinical development of traditional
Clinical trials of traditional herbal medicines present several challenges due to issues such as variable plant ingredients, lack of standardization, and safety concerns. However, these challenges can be addressed by applying current clinical trial guidelines and methodologies, such as conducting double-blind, placebo-controlled studies according to good clinical practice standards. Modern manufacturing techniques can also help standardize traditional medicine preparations for clinical testing. With proper study design and oversight, reliable data on the efficacy and safety of traditional medicines can be obtained through well-conducted clinical trials.
Cochrane Workshop Picos
The document discusses defining researchable questions using the PICOS approach. PICOS stands for Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Study design. It is a framework that makes defining research questions easier by identifying the key elements needed to answer the question and develop a search strategy. The document provides examples of how to apply each PICOS element when defining a sample question about using modern medicine versus traditional remedies to treat malaria in African children. It emphasizes that research questions should be clear, answer an evidence need, and be written for a general readership not assuming specialist knowledge.
AHRQ’s Effective Health Care Program
- The document discusses the topic selection process for the AHRQ Effective Health Care Program, which systematically reviews evidence on healthcare topics.
- It outlines principles for topic selection including stakeholder involvement, defined criteria, transparency, and process evaluation.
- An internal group reviews topic nominations using 18 selection criteria to identify important research topics in a structured, transparent manner. The process aims to prioritize topics that are relevant, non-redundant, and have sufficient evidence for review.
- Early results of the revised 2008 nomination process and ongoing challenges in identifying and prioritizing review topics are presented.
SHARE Webinar: Why Should I Join a Clinical Trial with Dr. Hershman
Dr. Dawn L. Hershman of the Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center at Columbia University presented the basics of clinical trials and emphasized how important it is for more patients to participate in them. She also discussed trials currently available for early stage and metastatic breast cancers. The webinar was presented on June 25, 2014. To hear the webinar, visit www.sharecancersupport.org/hershman
David Resnik - MedicReS World Congress 2012
Ethical Challenges of clinical and translational research: codes and policies David B. Resnik, JD, PhD, NIEHS/NIH
* This research is supported by the NIEHS/NIH. It does not represent the views of the NIEHS, NIH, or US government.
More Related Content
What's hot
Research Methodology
Dr. Athar Khan
Associate Professor
Department of Community Medicine
Liaquat College of Medicine & Dentistry
Karachi, Pakistan
matharm@yahoo.com
Crb tech reviews on clinical research jobs
There are two main types of healthcare studies: clinical trials and observational studies. Clinical trials involve testing new medical treatments on human volunteers to evaluate safety and effectiveness compared to existing standard treatments or placebos. Researchers allocate specific treatments to participants and collect data on health outcomes. Observational studies observe health outcomes in groups of participants receiving routine medical care and treatments are not allocated by researchers. The goal of both is to generate evidence to inform healthcare decisions and advance medical knowledge.
Clinical Trial Protocol Review for Study Feasibility Analysis
How to review a clinical research protocol for study feasibility assessment and clinical trial management. .
Clinical trails
This document provides an overview of different study designs used in epidemiological research, including observational studies like case reports, case series, cross-sectional studies, case-control studies, cohort studies, and experimental studies like randomized controlled trials. It discusses the advantages and disadvantages of each design and how they are used to study disease etiology, risk factors, and effects of interventions. Key points covered include how observational studies do not involve manipulation of exposures but can establish associations, while experimental studies allow investigation of cause-and-effect through controlled manipulation of exposures.
Protocol Design & Development: What You Need to Know to Ensure a Successful S...
Solid protocol design is critical to clinical development. No matter how well executed a clinical study is, if the underlying design is flawed, it wasn’t worth doing. In this presentation, Dr. David Shoemaker, SVP R&D, and Dr. Karen Kesler, AVP Operations, will walk through the process of developing a protocol, explain the major considerations, and point out common mistakes and challenges.
COCHRANE OVERVIEW AND PRISMA STATEMENT
1. The meta-analysis found that concomitant chemoradiotherapy improved overall survival compared to sequential chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer, due to better locoregional control, though it increased acute esophageal toxicity.
2. Temozolomide improved survival and delayed progression compared to radiotherapy alone for glioblastoma, but increased early adverse events. For recurrent glioblastoma, temozolomide improved time to progression over standard chemotherapy.
3. Surgery for early cervical adenocarcinoma showed a benefit over radiotherapy in one RCT, but most operated patients required adjuvant radiotherapy with greater morbidity compared to chemoradiation.
Retrospective vs Prospective Study
Retrospective vs Prospective Study: Advantages, Types and Differences.
https://www.cognibrain.com/retrospective-vs-prospective-study-advantages-types-and-differences/
Protocol writing
DETAILS OF WRITING A PROTOCOL.
By Dr. Amreen Saba Attariya
Dept of Pharmacology
M.R.Medical college, Gulbarga-India
Evidence based nursing resources
This document provides an overview of evidence-based nursing practice and how to effectively search for and evaluate evidence. It defines evidence-based practice as using the best available evidence from research to improve clinical practice. A 5-step process is outlined: formulating a question, searching literature, critically appraising evidence, applying evidence to practice, and re-evaluating. Guidance is given on formulating search strategies using PICO and searching various library databases and resources like Cochrane and CINAHL to find relevant evidence to answer clinical questions.
evidence based medicine ( dr.moaweyah)
This document discusses evidence-based medicine and statistical significance. It defines evidence-based medicine as using current best evidence from sources like systematic reviews and meta-analyses to make decisions about patient care. The 5 A's process for practicing evidence-based medicine is outlined as asking questions, acquiring evidence, appraising evidence, applying to patients, and assessing outcomes. Different types of studies used in evidence-based medicine are described, including systematic reviews/meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies.
Clinical Trial Presentation-6.29.15-cg
This educational webcast discusses clinical trials and their role in advancing research for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). It provides an overview of the clinical trial process, including the different phases from pre-clinical research to FDA approval. Common features of IBD clinical trials are reviewed, such as endpoints of symptom improvement and reduction of inflammation. Resources for learning more about participating in clinical trials through organizations like CCFA and ResearchMatch are presented.
How to conduct a systematic review
This document provides an overview of how to conduct a systematic review. It begins by defining what a systematic review is and why they are important for evidence-based practice. It then outlines the key steps in conducting a systematic review, including formulating an answerable question using PICO(T), performing a comprehensive literature search, selecting studies and extracting data in an unbiased manner, critically appraising the evidence, and synthesizing the data. The document emphasizes that systematic reviews need to follow a structured, systematic process and make all methods explicit to minimize bias. It also discusses challenges that can arise in systematic reviews like database, publication, and language biases.
1-Halt-it Protocol International v1.0 26nov12
This document outlines the protocol for the HALT-IT clinical trial, which will determine the effects of tranexamic acid (TXA) on mortality, morbidity, and other outcomes in patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding. The trial will enroll 8,000 patients from hospitals worldwide in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design comparing intravenous TXA to placebo. The primary outcome is death within 28 days. Secondary outcomes include rebleeding, need for intervention, transfusion requirements, thrombotic events, and other complications. If shown to be effective and safe, TXA could significantly impact the management of gastrointestinal bleeding globally.
Levels of evidence, recommendations & phases of
This document discusses levels of evidence and phases of clinical trials. It defines evidence-based medicine as using current best evidence from systematic research to make decisions about patient care. Levels of evidence are ranked from 1A to 5 based on study design, with systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials ranked highest. Clinical trials progress through four phases to test safety, efficacy, and optimal use of new drugs or devices. Phase 1 assesses safety, phase 2 establishes efficacy, phase 3 confirms safety and efficacy in larger groups, and phase 4 studies monitor risks and benefits after marketing.
Assessing Clinical Research Infrastructure Needs
This report summarizes the results of a campus-wide survey initiative, conducted by the Southern California Clinical and Translational Science Institute (SC CTSI), focused on the development of a clinical data warehouse for research (CDWR) and a clinical trials management system (CTMS) as well as general barriers to conducting clinical research at the University of Southern California (USC) and Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA).
Learn more about SC CTSI http://www.sc-ctsi.org/
Assessing Applicability
Understanding applicability, also referred to as relevance, the extent to which published results are likely to reflect expected outcomes when an intervention is applied broadly across populations.
Evidence Based Practice - EBP
This document provides an overview of evidence-based practice (EBP) for speech and language pathologists. It defines EBP as integrating the best research evidence, clinical expertise, and client values and preferences. The 5 steps of EBP are discussed: 1) developing an answerable clinical question, 2) finding the evidence, 3) critically appraising the evidence, 4) making an informed clinical decision, and 5) evaluating and improving the process. Key aspects of each step like developing PICO questions, searching various sources of evidence, critically evaluating research quality, and incorporating client values are explained. The importance of reflection, communication, and applying EBP principles in clinical practice is emphasized.
Clinical trial regulations for clinical development of traditional
Clinical trials of traditional herbal medicines present several challenges due to issues such as variable plant ingredients, lack of standardization, and safety concerns. However, these challenges can be addressed by applying current clinical trial guidelines and methodologies, such as conducting double-blind, placebo-controlled studies according to good clinical practice standards. Modern manufacturing techniques can also help standardize traditional medicine preparations for clinical testing. With proper study design and oversight, reliable data on the efficacy and safety of traditional medicines can be obtained through well-conducted clinical trials.
Cochrane Workshop Picos
The document discusses defining researchable questions using the PICOS approach. PICOS stands for Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Study design. It is a framework that makes defining research questions easier by identifying the key elements needed to answer the question and develop a search strategy. The document provides examples of how to apply each PICOS element when defining a sample question about using modern medicine versus traditional remedies to treat malaria in African children. It emphasizes that research questions should be clear, answer an evidence need, and be written for a general readership not assuming specialist knowledge.
AHRQ’s Effective Health Care Program
- The document discusses the topic selection process for the AHRQ Effective Health Care Program, which systematically reviews evidence on healthcare topics.
- It outlines principles for topic selection including stakeholder involvement, defined criteria, transparency, and process evaluation.
- An internal group reviews topic nominations using 18 selection criteria to identify important research topics in a structured, transparent manner. The process aims to prioritize topics that are relevant, non-redundant, and have sufficient evidence for review.
- Early results of the revised 2008 nomination process and ongoing challenges in identifying and prioritizing review topics are presented.
What's hot (20)
Clinical Trial Protocol Review for Study Feasibility Analysis
Clinical Trial Protocol Review for Study Feasibility Analysis
Protocol Design & Development: What You Need to Know to Ensure a Successful S...
Protocol Design & Development: What You Need to Know to Ensure a Successful S...
Levels of evidence, recommendations & phases of
Levels of evidence, recommendations & phases of
Clinical trial regulations for clinical development of traditional
Clinical trial regulations for clinical development of traditional
Similar to Clinical Trials
SHARE Webinar: Why Should I Join a Clinical Trial with Dr. Hershman
Dr. Dawn L. Hershman of the Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center at Columbia University presented the basics of clinical trials and emphasized how important it is for more patients to participate in them. She also discussed trials currently available for early stage and metastatic breast cancers. The webinar was presented on June 25, 2014. To hear the webinar, visit www.sharecancersupport.org/hershman
David Resnik - MedicReS World Congress 2012
Ethical Challenges of clinical and translational research: codes and policies David B. Resnik, JD, PhD, NIEHS/NIH
* This research is supported by the NIEHS/NIH. It does not represent the views of the NIEHS, NIH, or US government.
To know about Research in Medical (1).pptx
This document provides an overview of research in medical and health fields. It discusses the importance of health research, defines different types of medical research including basic, applied, quantitative, qualitative, experimental and non-experimental research. It also outlines various research methodologies like descriptive research, exploratory research, cross-sectional research, longitudinal research and case study research. The document emphasizes that medical research facilitates learning, highlights issues, and helps advance treatment, diagnosis and understanding of human health problems through the scientific method.
Evidence based orthodontics parag
This document provides an overview of evidence-based orthodontics. It defines evidence-based orthodontics as integrating the best available research evidence with clinical expertise and patient values. The need for evidence-based orthodontics is that it allows practitioners to provide the currently best care available to patients. Evidence-based orthodontic practice differs from traditional practice by regularly accessing new evidence, identifying risk factors, and providing continuous, patient-centered, and efficient care. Systematic reviews are used to summarize research evidence in an unbiased manner to inform clinical decision making.
Reasons for conducting clinical trials
To explain in simple terms, a clinical trail is a research in human volunteers to answer certain health questions. Carefully conducted clinical trails are the quickest and safest way to discover new treatment
methods that work in people and enhance their health.
How to do clinical research at KEMU
This document provides guidance on how to conduct clinical research at KEMU. It begins by defining key terms like clinical trials and observational studies. It then discusses James Lind's seminal clinical trial from the 18th century that demonstrated citrus fruits could treat scurvy in sailors. The document outlines the basic building blocks of a clinical study, including developing a research question, hypothesis, methods, observations, results, and conclusions. It provides details on study types, the importance of IRB approval, randomization, recruiting participants, collecting and analyzing data, and reporting outcomes and adverse events. Finally, it summarizes a clinical trial that compared the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran to warfarin for treating venous thromboemb
Evidence Based Medicine
Clinical Questions types .
A Hierarchy of Preprocessed Evidence.
EBM definition and value.
Knowledge and Skills Necessary for Optimal Evidence-Based Practice.
Basic computer and internet knowledge for electronic searching of the literature
Proposal writing by dr.s.kalpana
This document provides guidance on how to write a research protocol. It explains that a research protocol is a document that describes the research question, hypothesis, objectives, design, methodology, statistical considerations and expected outcomes. It emphasizes that the protocol should communicate the need and nature of the study in a simple, clear manner to convince stakeholders. The document outlines the various sections that should be included in a protocol such as introduction, methodology, analysis plan, references and ethics considerations. It stresses that the protocol should indicate how the study will advance scientific knowledge and potentially impact healthcare, policies or further research. The document provides tips for choosing a feasible, novel topic and refining the research question and objectives. It also discusses various study designs, sampling techniques,
Newhouse arkansas 4-7-14(v2)
This document summarizes a presentation about the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) and its methods. It discusses how PCORI funds research to help patients make informed healthcare decisions by producing high-quality evidence. Key points include that PCORI research must be patient-centered, compare at least two alternatives, and use outcomes that matter to patients. It also outlines PCORI's research portfolio, methodology standards, and application review process.
Ethics in clinical research
This document discusses ethics in clinical research and medical research. It covers key topics like the principles of ethics, objectives of medical research ethics, functions of medical research, moral problems in clinical research, and ethics requirements. The three main ethical principles are described as justice, respect for persons, and beneficence/non-maleficence. Informed consent, minimizing risks and maximizing benefits, non-exploitation of subjects, and balancing research with patient care are some of the important aspects covered.
LHS Research vs Care
Ethics and Learning Health Care: an overview of the differences between what is considered research and what is considered clinical care, and an introduction to the ethical issues that arise from this boundary being blurred.
Policy and Funding for CER: Making Sense of a Confusing Landscape
UCSF researcher, Michael Steinman, MD, Director of CTSI's Comparative Effectiveness Research initiative presents. View more related presentations and resources at http://accelerate.ucsf.edu/research/cer
Ethics of clinical trials
The document summarizes key ethical principles for conducting clinical trials including: obtaining informed consent, minimizing risks and ensuring a favorable risk-benefit ratio for participants, selecting participants equitably, respecting privacy and confidentiality, having trials approved and monitored by an IRB, stopping trials if risks are found to outweigh benefits, and disseminating results. It also discusses ethical issues around placebos, randomization, choice of controls, recruitment, monitoring safety, authorship, and conflicts of interest.
Clinical trial
The document discusses clinical trials, including what they are, their purpose, design, phases, and types. Clinical trials are research studies conducted in human beings to test new treatments and find better ways to prevent, diagnose, and treat diseases. They have inclusion and exclusion criteria to determine who can participate. Trials go through four phases to evaluate a treatment's safety, efficacy, and effectiveness in larger groups. Major types include treatment, prevention, diagnostic, and quality of life trials. ClinicalTrials.gov is a resource to find information on ongoing clinical studies.
Comparative Effectiveness Research
Presentation on Comparative Effectiveness Research at University of Tennessee, Knoxville, September 2, 2010
COMMON JOB INTERVIEW QUESTIONS WITH ANSWERS ASKED IN CLINICAL RESEARCH INTERV...
COMMON JOB INTERVIEW QUESTIONS WITH ANSWERS ASKED IN CLINICAL RESEARCH INTERV...Pristyn Research Solutions
These are the commonly asked questions with its answers asked in job interviews.
https://pristynresearch.com/
MAIL ID - pristynresearch@gmail.com
FACEBOOK- https://www.facebook.com/pristynsolutions
INSTAGRAM- https://www.instagram.com/pristyn_res...
TWITTER- https://twitter.com/Pristynresearch
SLIDESHARE- https://www.slideshare.net/azherkhan5916
LINKEDIN- https://www.linkedin.com/in/pristyn-research-191072119/
ADDRESS-
1) Parmar Trade Centre, A-wing,105/106, Sadhu Vaswani Chowk, Pune, 411001. Email: info@pristynresearch.com Phone: 09028839789
2)T-21/4 ,Opposite To Expert Global, Garware Stadium Road , Software Technology Park of India(STPI), MIDC, Aurangabad-431001. Email: info@pristynresearch.com Call us: 09607709586
Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials
The document discusses the need for more consistency in outcomes reported across clinical trials. It introduces the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) Initiative, which aims to develop standardized "core outcome sets" that define the minimum outcomes that should be reported in all trials for specific clinical areas. The COMET Initiative website provides resources for developing outcome sets and identifying existing related work to avoid duplication. Stakeholders like funders and journal editors are encouraged to support the use of core outcomes in order to make trial results more useful for patients and healthcare decision-making.
Research ethics-WMB-July312022.pdf
This document discusses research ethics and institutional review boards (IRBs). It explains that IRBs are committees that protect the rights and welfare of research subjects. There are three levels of IRB review - exempt, expedited, and full board review - depending on the risk level of the research. Exempt and expedited reviews have minimal risk, while full board reviews involve greater than minimal risk. The document also defines research misconduct as behavior that falls short of ethical and scientific standards. Common types of misconduct include fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism. Research misconduct undermines trust in science.
Should I Participate in a Clinical Trial?
This talk will review the importance of ongoing medical research and how it helps advance medical knowledge and promote the development of new treatments. We will discuss the research process, the protection of study participants, and how individuals may find and choose research studies to volunteer in at SMG or elsewhere.
Steps and Principals of clinical research in Surgery.pptx
The document outlines the basic steps and principles of clinical research in surgery. It defines research and describes the inductive and deductive approaches. Research aims to advance medical knowledge and improve patient care. The main types of research are basic science, clinical, translational, and applied. Clinical research involves studying patients and health outcomes to identify areas for improvement. Key steps include developing objectives and protocols, obtaining ethical approval, collecting and analyzing data, and disseminating findings. Important principles are informed consent, safety, validity, transparency, and avoiding bias and plagiarism.
Similar to Clinical Trials (20)
SHARE Webinar: Why Should I Join a Clinical Trial with Dr. Hershman
SHARE Webinar: Why Should I Join a Clinical Trial with Dr. Hershman
Policy and Funding for CER: Making Sense of a Confusing Landscape
Policy and Funding for CER: Making Sense of a Confusing Landscape
COMMON JOB INTERVIEW QUESTIONS WITH ANSWERS ASKED IN CLINICAL RESEARCH INTERV...
COMMON JOB INTERVIEW QUESTIONS WITH ANSWERS ASKED IN CLINICAL RESEARCH INTERV...
Steps and Principals of clinical research in Surgery.pptx
Steps and Principals of clinical research in Surgery.pptx
Recently uploaded
Hypotension and role of physiotherapy in it
This particular slides consist of- what is hypotension,what are it's causes and it's effect on body, risk factors, symptoms,complications, diagnosis and role of physiotherapy in it.
This slide is very helpful for physiotherapy students and also for other medical and healthcare students.
Here is the summary of hypotension:
Hypotension, or low blood pressure, is when the pressure of blood circulating in the body is lower than normal or expected. It's only a problem if it negatively impacts the body and causes symptoms. Normal blood pressure is usually between 90/60 mmHg and 120/80 mmHg, but pressures below 90/60 are generally considered hypotensive.
一比一原版(USF毕业证)旧金山大学毕业证如何办理
USF毕业证offer【微信95270640】《旧金山大学毕业证购买》《如何办理USF毕业证旧金山大学文凭学历》Q微信95270640实体公司，专业可靠，办理毕业证办美国成绩单,做加拿大文凭学历认证,办新西兰学位证，学位证书是什么?《制作旧金山大学毕业证多少钱》《USF学历证书丢了怎么办理》办澳洲文凭认证，办留信网认证（网上可查，实体公司，专业可靠）
专业为留学生办理旧金山大学旧金山大学硕士学位证成绩单【100%存档可查】留学全套申请材料办理。本公司承诺所有毕业证成绩单成品全部按照学校原版工艺对照一比一制作和学校一样的羊皮纸张保证您证书的质量！
如果你回国在学历认证方面有以下难题请联系我们我们将竭诚为你解决认证瓶颈
1所有材料真实但资料不全无法提供完全齐整的原件。【如：成绩单丶毕业证丶回国证明等材料中有遗失的。】
2获得真实的国外最终学历学位但国外本科学历就读经历存在问题或缺陷。【如：国外本科是教育部不承认的或者是联合办学项目教育部没有备案的或者外本科没有正常毕业的。】
3学分转移联合办学等情况复杂不知道怎么整理材料的。时间紧迫自己不清楚递交流程的。
如果你是以上情况之一请联系我们我们将在第一时间内给你免费咨询相关信息。我们将帮助你整理认证所需的各种材料.帮你解决国外学历认证难题。
国外旧金山大学旧金山大学硕士学位证成绩单办理方法：
1客户提供办理信息：姓名生日专业学位毕业时间等（如信息不确定可以咨询顾问：我们有专业老师帮你查询旧金山大学旧金山大学硕士学位证成绩单）；
2开始安排制作旧金山大学毕业证成绩单电子图；
3旧金山大学毕业证成绩单电子版做好以后发送给您确认；
4旧金山大学毕业证成绩单电子版您确认信息无误之后安排制作成品；
5旧金山大学成品做好拍照或者视频给您确认；
6快递给客户（国内顺丰国外DHLUPS等快读邮寄）。头贼脑的倒也逗人喜爱日上三竿时山娃总爱窜进自家瓜棚里跟小伙伴们坐着聊天聊着聊着便忍不住往瓜田里逡巡一番抱起一只硕大的西瓜用石刀劈开抑或用拳头砸开每人抱起一大块就啃啃得满嘴满脸猴屁股般的红艳大家一个劲地指着对方吃吃地笑瓜裂得古怪奇形怪状却丝毫不影响瓜味甜丝丝的满嘴生津遍地都是瓜横七竖八的活像掷满了一地的大石块摘走二三只爷爷是断然发现不了的即便发现爷爷也不恼反而教山娃辨认孰熟孰嫩孰甜孰淡名义上是护瓜吃
Pneumothorax and role of Physiotherapy in it.
This particular slides consist of- what is Pneumothorax,what are it's causes and it's effect on body, risk factors, symptoms,complications, diagnosis and role of physiotherapy in it.
This slide is very helpful for physiotherapy students and also for other medical and healthcare students.
Here is a summary of Pneumothorax:
Pneumothorax, also known as a collapsed lung, is a condition that occurs when air leaks into the space between the lung and chest wall. This air buildup puts pressure on the lung, preventing it from expanding fully when you breathe. A pneumothorax can cause a complete or partial collapse of the lung.
Test bank clinical nursing skills a concept based approach 4e pearson educati...
Test bank clinical nursing skills a concept based approach 4e pearson educati...rightmanforbloodline
Test bank clinical nursing skills a concept based approach 4e pearson education
Test bank clinical nursing skills a concept based approach 4e pearson education
Test bank clinical nursing skills a concept based approach 4e pearson educationKnow Latest Hiranandani Hospital Powai News.pdf
As Mumbai's premier kidney transplant and donation center, L H Hiranandani Hospital Powai is not just a medical facility; it's a beacon of hope where cutting-edge science meets compassionate care, transforming lives and redefining the standards of kidney health in India.
India Medical Devices Market: Size, Share, and In-Depth Competitive Analysis ...
According to TechSci Research report, “India Medical Devices Market Industry Size, Share, Trends, Competition, Opportunity and Forecast, 2019-2029,” the India Medical Devices Market was valued at USD 15.35 billion in 2023 and is anticipated to witness impressive growth in the forecast period, with a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 5.35% through 2029. This growth is driven by various factors, including strategic collaborations and partnerships among leading companies, a growing population, and the increasing demand for advanced healthcare solutions.
Recent Trends
Strategic Collaborations and Partnerships
One of the most significant trends driving the India Medical Devices Market is the increasing number of collaborations and partnerships among leading companies. These alliances aim to merge the expertise of individual companies to strengthen their market position and enhance their product offerings. For instance, partnerships between local manufacturers and international companies bring advanced technologies and manufacturing techniques to the Indian market, fostering innovation and improving product quality.
Browse over XX market data Figures and spread through XX Pages and an in-depth TOC on " India Medical Devices Market.” - https://www.techsciresearch.com/report/india-medical-devices-market/8161.html
Psychedelic Retreat Portugal - Escape to Lighthouse Retreats for an unforgett...
Our aim is to organise conscious gatherings and retreats for open and inquisitive minds and souls, with and without the assistance of sacred plants.
nurs fpx 4050 assessment 4 final care coordination plan.pdf
nurs fpx 4050 assessment 4 final care coordination plan.pdf
Health Tech Market Intelligence Prelim Questions -
The Ultimate Guide to Setting up Market Research in Health Tech part -1
How to effectively start market research in the health tech industry by defining objectives, crafting problem statements, selecting methods, identifying data collection sources, and setting clear timelines. This guide covers all the preliminary steps needed to lay a strong foundation for your research.
This lays foundation of scoping research project what are the
Before embarking on a research project, especially one aimed at scoping and defining parameters like the one described for health tech IT, several crucial considerations should be addressed. Here’s a comprehensive guide covering key aspects to ensure a well-structured and successful research initiative:
1. Define Research Objectives and Scope
Clear Objectives: Define specific goals such as understanding market needs, identifying new opportunities, assessing risks, or refining pricing strategies.
Scope Definition: Clearly outline the boundaries of the research in terms of geographical focus, target demographics (e.g., age, socio-economic status), and industry sectors (e.g., healthcare IT).
3. Review Existing Literature and Resources
Literature Review: Conduct a thorough review of existing research, market reports, and relevant literature to build foundational knowledge.
Gap Analysis: Identify gaps in existing knowledge or areas where further exploration is needed.
4. Select Research Methodology and Tools
Methodological Approach: Choose appropriate research methods such as surveys, interviews, focus groups, or data analytics.
Tools and Resources: Select tools like Google Forms for surveys, analytics platforms (e.g., SimilarWeb, Statista), and expert consultations.
5. Ethical Considerations and Compliance
Ethical Approval: Ensure compliance with ethical guidelines for research involving human subjects.
Data Privacy: Implement measures to protect participant confidentiality and adhere to data protection regulations (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA).
6. Budget and Resource Allocation
Resource Planning: Allocate resources including time, budget, and personnel required for each phase of the research.
Contingency Planning: Anticipate and plan for unforeseen challenges or adjustments to the research plan.
7. Develop Research Instruments
Survey Design: Create well-structured surveys using tools like Google Forms to gather quantitative data.
Interview and Focus Group Guides: Prepare detailed scripts and discussion points for qualitative data collection.
8. Sampling Strategy
Sampling Design: Define the sampling frame, size, and method (e.g., random sampling, stratified sampling) to ensure representation of target demographics.
Participant Recruitment: Plan recruitment strategies to reach and engage the intended participant groups effectively.
9. Data Collection and Analysis Plan
Data Collection: Implement methods for data gathering, ensuring consistency and validity.
Analysis Techniques: Decide on analytical approaches (e.g., statistical
Solution manual for managerial accounting 18th edition by ray garrison eric n...
Solution manual for managerial accounting 18th edition by ray garrison eric n...rightmanforbloodline
Solution manual for managerial accounting 18th edition by ray garrison eric noreen and peter brewer_compressed
Solution manual for managerial accounting 18th edition by ray garrison eric noreen and peter brewer_compressed一比一原版(UoA毕业证)昆士兰科技大学毕业证如何办理
UoA毕业证学历书【微信95270640】办文凭{昆士兰科技大学毕业证}Q微Q微信95270640UoA毕业证书成绩单/学历认证UoA Diploma未毕业、挂科怎么办？+QQ微信：Q微信95270640-大学Offer（申请大学）、成绩单（申请考研）、语言证书、在读证明、使馆公证、办真实留信网认证、真实大使馆认证、学历认证
办理国外昆士兰科技大学毕业证书 #成绩单改成绩 #教育部学历学位认证 #毕业证认证 #留服认证 #使馆认证（留学回国人员证明） #（证）等
真实教育部认证教育部存档中国教育部留学服务中心认证（即教育部留服认证）网站100%可查.
真实使馆认证（即留学人员回国证明）使馆存档可通过大使馆查询确认.
留信网认证国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书留信网永久存档可查.
昆士兰科技大学昆士兰科技大学毕业证文凭证书毕业证 #成绩单等全套材料从防伪到印刷从水印到钢印烫金跟学校原版100%相同.
国际留学归国服务中心：实体公司注册经营行业标杆精益求精！
国外毕业证学位证成绩单办理流程：
1客户提供办理昆士兰科技大学昆士兰科技大学毕业证文凭证书信息：姓名生日专业学位毕业时间等（如信息不确定可以咨询顾问：我们有专业老师帮你查询）；
2开始安排制作昆士兰科技大学毕业证成绩单电子图；
3昆士兰科技大学毕业证成绩单电子版做好以后发送给您确认；
4昆士兰科技大学毕业证成绩单电子版您确认信息无误之后安排制作成品；
5昆士兰科技大学成品做好拍照或者视频给您确认；
6快递给客户（国内顺丰国外DHLUPS等快递邮寄昆士兰科技大学昆士兰科技大学毕业证文凭证书）。闷不乐的样子父亲特意带山娃去找三楼房东家的儿子小伍玩小伍比山娃小一岁虎头虎脑的很霸气父亲让山娃跟小伍去夏令营听课山娃很高兴夏令营就设在附近一所小学山娃发现那所小学比自己的学校更大更美操场上还铺有塑胶跑道呢里面很多小朋友一班一班的快快乐乐原来城里娃都藏这儿来了怪不得平时见不到他们山娃恍然大悟起来吹拉弹唱琴棋书画山娃都不懂却什么都想学山娃怨自己太笨什么都不会斟酌再三山娃终于选定了学美术当听说每月要交感
Fit to Fly PCR Covid Testing at our Clinic Near You
A Fit-to-Fly PCR Test is a crucial service for travelers needing to meet the entry requirements of various countries or airlines. This test involves a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for COVID-19, which is considered the gold standard for detecting active infections. At our travel clinic in Leeds, we offer fast and reliable Fit to Fly PCR testing, providing you with an official certificate verifying your negative COVID-19 status. Our process is designed for convenience and accuracy, with quick turnaround times to ensure you receive your results and certificate in time for your departure. Trust our professional and experienced medical team to help you travel safely and compliantly, giving you peace of mind for your journey.www.nxhealthcare.co.uk
National Rural Health Mission(NRHM).pptx
This document describes the NRHM Scheme, its goals, objectives, components, and new initiatives.
Research, Monitoring and Evaluation, in Public Health
This is a presentation on the overview of the role of monitoring and evaluation in public health. It describes the various components and how a robust M&E system can possitively impact the results or effectiveness of a public health intervention.
Monopoly PCD Pharma Franchise in Tripura
Our company incorporates various drug formulations covering pharma tablets, syrups, capsules, gels, sachets, ointments, creams, injectables.
Assessing Large Language Models in the Context of Bioterrorism: An Epidemiolo...
Assessing Large Language Models in the Context of Bioterrorism: An Epidemiological Perspective with Experimental Insights
nursing management of patient with Empyema ppt
prepared by Prof. BLESSY THOMAS, SPN
Empyema is a disease of respiratory system It is defines as the accumulation of thick, purulent fluid within the pleural space, often with fibrin development.
Empyema is also called pyothorax or purulent pleuritis.
It’s a condition in which pus gathers in the area between the lungs and the inner surface of the chest wall. This area is known as the pleural space.
Pus is a fluid that’s filled with immune cells, dead cells, and bacteria.
Pus in the pleural space can’t be coughed out. Instead, it needs to be drained by a needle or surgery.
Empyema usually develops after pneumonia, which is an infection of the lung tissue. it is mainly caused due in infectious micro-organisms. It can be treated with medications and other measures.
Sectional dentures for microstomia patients.pptx
Microstomia, characterized by an abnormally small oral aperture, presents significant challenges in prosthodontic treatment, including limited access for examination, difficulties in impression making, and challenges with prosthesis insertion and removal. To manage these issues, customized impression techniques using sectional trays and elastomeric materials are employed. Prostheses may be designed in segments or with flexible materials to facilitate handling. Minimally invasive procedures and the use of digital technologies can enhance patient comfort. Education and training for patients on prosthesis care and maintenance are crucial for compliance. Regular follow-up and a multidisciplinary approach, involving collaboration with other specialists, ensure comprehensive care and improved quality of life for microstomia patients.
Innovative Minds France's Most Impactful Healthcare Leaders.pdf
This edition features a handful of Innovative Minds: France's Most Impactful Healthcare Leaders that are leading us into a better future.
Recently uploaded (20)
Test bank clinical nursing skills a concept based approach 4e pearson educati...
Test bank clinical nursing skills a concept based approach 4e pearson educati...
India Medical Devices Market: Size, Share, and In-Depth Competitive Analysis ...
India Medical Devices Market: Size, Share, and In-Depth Competitive Analysis ...
Psychedelic Retreat Portugal - Escape to Lighthouse Retreats for an unforgett...
Psychedelic Retreat Portugal - Escape to Lighthouse Retreats for an unforgett...
3. User Guide Activity Budget Tracking App Steps to apply.pptx
3. User Guide Activity Budget Tracking App Steps to apply.pptx
nurs fpx 4050 assessment 4 final care coordination plan.pdf
nurs fpx 4050 assessment 4 final care coordination plan.pdf
Health Tech Market Intelligence Prelim Questions -
Health Tech Market Intelligence Prelim Questions -
Solution manual for managerial accounting 18th edition by ray garrison eric n...
Solution manual for managerial accounting 18th edition by ray garrison eric n...
Fit to Fly PCR Covid Testing at our Clinic Near You
Fit to Fly PCR Covid Testing at our Clinic Near You
Research, Monitoring and Evaluation, in Public Health
Research, Monitoring and Evaluation, in Public Health
Assessing Large Language Models in the Context of Bioterrorism: An Epidemiolo...
Assessing Large Language Models in the Context of Bioterrorism: An Epidemiolo...
Innovative Minds France's Most Impactful Healthcare Leaders.pdf
Innovative Minds France's Most Impactful Healthcare Leaders.pdf
Clinical Trials
- 1. Clinical Trials: Research Matters Cheryl Habaue, MSN, OCN, CCRP Pediatric and Adult Oncology Research Manager
- 2. Objectives • Discuss the Definition of Clinical Trials. • Review Types of Research and Regulations/Ethical Considerations. • Discuss Trial Design including randomization of clinical trials. • Examine data management and analysis of clinical trials.
- 3. Definition of Clinical Trials
- 4. Definition of Clinical Trials
- 5. Definition of Clinical Trials World Health Organization Definition- • A clinical trial is any research study that prospectively assigns human participants or groups of humans to one or more health-related interventions to evaluate the effects on health outcomes. • Interventions include but are not restricted to drugs, cells and other biological products, surgical procedures, radiological procedures, devices, behavioral treatments, process-of-care changes, preventive care, etc. World Health Organization: http://www.who.int/topics/clinical_trials/en/
- 6. Definition of Clinical Trials National Institute of Health Clinical Trial Definition • A research study in which one or more human subjects are prospectively assigned to one or more interventions (which may include placebo or other control) to evaluate the effects of those interventions on health-related biomedical or behavioral outcomes. https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-15-015.html
- 9. Ethics in Research • Tuskeegee Study • Nazi Prisoner Research WWII Tuskegee Syphilis Study Legacy Committee Final Report of May 20, 1996
- 11. Ethics in Research • Informed Consent • Nature, duration, and purpose • Alternative procedures/Treatments • Method and means • All inconveniences, risks, and hazards • Possible effects on health/possible benefits • HIPAA • Costs • Compensation for Injury • Contact Information • There should be no force, fraud, deceit, duress, coercion • Vulnerable populations • Children, Pregnant Women, Prisoners, Cognitively Impaired, Language Barriers
- 13. Rules to Research by • Federal Code of Regulations 21 • Part 11 compliant • International Conference on Harmonization (ICH 6) and Good Clinical Practice • Institutional Review Board
- 14. Research Design
- 15. Research Design • Blueprint for the collection, measurement and analysis of the study • Overall strategy
- 16. Research Design
- 17. Randomization / Open Label • What does it mean • Why is it done • Terms: Control Arm vs. Study Arm
- 18. Sponsors • Sponsor is defined as “a person who takes responsibility for and initiates a clinical investigation. The sponsor may be an individual or a pharmaceutical company…” • 21 CFR 312, subpart D (Responsibilities of Sponsors • and Investigators). • Government, Pharmaceutical Companies, Networks, VA, Schools, Private http://www.centerwatch.com/pdfs/s11604_ch4.pdf
- 19. Research Process
- 20. Data Management
- 21. Data Management • No Data = No Research • Source Documents • Grading – CTCAE 4.03
- 22. Data Analysis • Statistics to be Analyzed • Conclusions Compiled • Publications/Manuscripts Presented • Key: How can it change practice
- 25. Post Analysis
- 26. EAP/Compassionate Use • Access to medication prior to FDA approval • Sponsor needs to have a program for the compound • Treating MD needs to write a letter of need • Sponsor Approval/FDA Approval • Must pass IRB approval
- 27. • Everyone with XYZ cancer will qualify for this study • Everything is free for patient’s on study • Once you are on study you cannot get out • Protocols are hard to write
- 28. Questions