Climate change: Impacts




        HON 305V
       Dr. Andersen
How does current climate change compare
 to climate change in the geologic past?
●   Sources of data on past climates
    ●   Tree rings
    ●   Glacial ice (and trapped air bubbles)
    ●   Ocean sediments
    ●   Coral reefs
●   Current climate change much more rapid than
    anything seen in paleoclimate reconstructions
Glacial and interglacial periods
    during the Pleistocene
The current interglacial
Example: the PETM
●   PETM = Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum
●   About 50 million years ago
    ●   During the Cenozoic
    ●   About 10 million years after the dinosaurs went extinct
●   Crocodiles and palm trees north of the Arctic Circle
●   Temps on U.S. Gulf Coast averaged 80 degrees F (5
    degrees hotter than currently), and varied about 9
    degrees F across seasons (vary about 21 degrees
    across seasons currently)
●   Ocean temperatures increased by 5 to 7 degrees C in
    about 10,000 years
The PETM, II
●   Apparently coincided with a global “burp” of
    carbon release equivalent to burning the rest of
    Earth's known fossil fuel reserves
●   Possible that mild warming led to release of
    methane hydrates on ocean floor into the
    atmosphere
●   Current rate of release of carbon into the
    atmosphere is about 10 times higher than
    during the PETM
How is the climate already
                changing?
●   About 15,000 high-temperature records were
    broken during March 2012
●   As of 2010, the 15 warmest years on record
    since 1880 had all occurred within the previous
    16 years
●   Global average temperatures have risen about
    0.7 degrees C since 1957 (a very good year)
Each decade gets warmer


              Remember the
              carbon dioxide
              measurements from
              Mauna Loa?
              Connect the dots.
What impacts of climate change are already being seen?
                  Some eastern North American
                  tree species migrating northward
                  1 km per year.
                  (Woodall et al 2009)




Around James Bay in Canada,
the permafrost line has receded
130 km in the last 50 years.
(Payette & Huppe 2010)
How much can we expect temperatures to
      rise through the end of this century?
●   Current IPCC projections are for 2 – 11 degrees
    F increase in global average
●   Regional changes may be less or greater
●   Temperature increases for the U.S. Expected to
    be about 30% higher than average
●   The Arctic is expected to warm up the most,
    and is already warming at twice the global
    average rate
What about sea levels?
           ●   Not rising because of melting sea ice,
               but continental ice (Greenland and
               Antarctica – above sea level)
           ●   Sea level could rise by 1.5 to 6 feet by
               the end of the century
           ●   Bangladesh will lose 17.5% of its land
               area if sea level rises 3 feet
           ●   The Maldives and other island chains
               may disappear completely
th
Sea level rise in the 20 century
Impacts on precipitation
●   Higher temperatures → more evaporation
●   Faster hydrologic cycle
●   More rainfall in some places, less in others
●   In general, less rain on either side of the equator, more
    in high latitudes
●   Less snow in the mountain West will impact
    ●   Fish populations
    ●   Hydropower
    ●   Recreation
    ●   Municipal and agricultural water availability
Hydrology
●   Altered annual streamflows
●   Changes in timing of runoff
●   Changes in relative length of low-flow and high-flow conditions
●   Different watersheds differentially vulnerable
    (Null et al. 2010, PloS ONE 5(4))

●   Current reservoirs, canals etc. built for current
    conditions, not future conditions
From IPCC AR-4 2007
Wildfire regimes will change
●   10% to 50% increase in fire activity across
    North America by 2050
    ●   Effects of fire on vegetation may overshadow direct
        effects of climate change on distribution,
        abundance, and dispersal
        (Flannigan et al., 2000, Science of the Total Environment, 262:221-229)

●   Increases in fire frequency in some regions
    may be balanced out by decrease in others
    ●   Still, expect substantial change in global fire
        regimes
        (Krawchuk et al., 2009, PloS ONE 4(4))
Changing fire regimes will impact
                 society
●   Increases in
     ●   Fuel load
     ●   Ignition rate
     ●   Fire intensity
     ●   Length of fire season
●   May overwhelm agency fire response and
    suppression capabilities
    (Podur & Wotton, 2010, Ecol. Modell. 221(9): 1301-1309)
Potential for crop failures
●   Agriculture throughout Africa runs some risk of
    negative impacts from climate change
     ●   Existing cropping systems and infrastructure not
         sufficient to meet current demand
         (Muller et al., 2011, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 108(11):4313-4315)



●   Regions with highest food insecurity (South
    Asia and Southern Africa) face greatest risk of
    reduced yield and crop failure
    (Lobell et al., 2008, Science 319(5863):607-610)
Mechanisms and severity of crop
              failures
●   Simulation studies of spring wheat in
    northeastern China
     ●   Increased crop failure rates under future climate
         –   Thermal stress
         –   Water stress
●   Maximum failure rates increase more rapidly
    than median failure rates
    (Challinor et al., 2010, Env. Res. Lett. 5(3): 034012)
Mitigating crop failures
●   Farmers can protect themselves from some of
    the effects of climate change by planting a
    more diverse array of crops
    (Lin, 2011, BioScience 61(3):183-193)



●   Even crops thought to be heat-tolerant may be
    more sensitive to rising temperature than we
    expect
     ●   1C temp. increase → yield loss in 65% of African
         maize-growing region
         (Lobell et al., 2011, Nature Climate Change, doi:10.1038/nclimate1043)
The impacts are not limited to land-
      based food production
●   Impacts on anadromous fish
    ●   Warmer temperatures
    ●   Earlier peak stream flow
        (Martins et al., 2011, Global Change Biology, 17(1):99-114)


●   Impacts on marine fisheries
    ●   Temperature
    ●   Salinity changes (particularly in coastal fisheries
        with nearshore/estuarine spawning)
        (Lindegren et al., 2010, Proc. Roy Soc. B 277(1691):2121-2130)
        (Hare et al., 2010, Ecol. Appl. 20(2):452-464)
Climate change impacts on ecosystems

●   The growing season in parts of the Northern
    Hemisphere became two weeks longer in the
    second half of the 20th century
●   Spring is coming earlier in both hemispheres
●   Longer growing seasons impact
    ●   Pollinators
    ●   Migratory birds
    ●   Pests (also influenced by milder winters)
    ●   Water availability (more evaporation and transpiration)
Observed climate change impacts on species are
consistent with predicted impacts


                      1) Phenology
                         Walther et al 2002
                         Parmesan & Yohe 2003
                         Doswald et al 2009


                      2) Range shifts
                         Parmesan et al 1999
                         Parmesan & Yohe 2003
                         Tingley et al 2009

                      3) Other effects
                         Laurance 2008
                         Boersma et al 2009
We can model the way in which current (and
future) geographic ranges depend on climate



               +                          =   ?
1. Bioclimatic envelope models based on
   Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt) criteria

2. Habitat-based approach
Bioclimatic envelope models combine the
answers to two simple questions

1. What are the climatic conditions in which a species is
   currently found?
      Climate data: PRISM, WorldClim, ClimateWizard
      Occurrence data: GBIF, Natural Heritage programs


2. Where will those conditions be found in the future?
      GCM predictions




                        +                                =   ?
MaxEnt provides parsimonious estimation of
bioclimatic envelopes

Machine learning algorithm to estimate geographic
distributions under current and future conditions

Phillips et al 2006
Baldwin & Bender 2007
Phillips & Dudik 2008




                        +                   =       ?
Bioclimatic models predict habitat loss in the
American Pika (Ochotona princeps)
                                        l




                   Regional losses of 53% to 71%
                   across 5 regions

                     (Calkins MS thesis, NMSU, 2010)
Bioclimatic models predict patterns of habitat
loss in European bats

          l
                     Northern species more
                     likely to suffer losses than
                     temperate and
                     Mediterranean species
                     Rebelo et al 2010
A mixed approach predicts species distributions
based on the distributions of habitats

1. Use MaxEnt to predict future distributions of
   habitat types
  Relies on Gap Analysis Project landcover data



2. Overlay existing deductive animal distribution
   models on future habitat distributions
  Relies on Gap Analysis Project animal distribution models




           +                        +                         =
                                                                  ?
Mixed approach predicts complex habitat loss
pattern for swift fox (Vulpes velox)




                       Complex response of grassland
                       habitats to future climate scenarios.

                       C3 grasses have advantage
                       at elevated CO2

                       C4 grasses prefer warmer
                       temperatures
                       Redman et al MS
Climate change threats to
       biodiversity
             ●   Globally, 15% - 37% of
                 species “committed to
                 extinction” due to climate
                 change alone, not including
                 effects of other factors
                 (Thomas et al 2004, Nature 427:145 – 148)

             ●   Effects of climate change on
                 biodiversity by year 2100
                 likely to be exceeded only
                 by effects of land-use
                 changes
                 (Sala et al . 2000, Science 287:1770-1774)
●   How do predictions of future precipitation
    distributions match up with what we know about
    global patterns of atmospheric circulation
    (Hadley cells etc.)
●   How do paleoclimate studies help us to
    understand and prepare for future climate
    change?
●   How might rising sea levels influence patterns
    of human immigration?
●   How might some of these impacts interact in
    unexpected ways?

Climate change Impacts

  • 1.
    Climate change: Impacts HON 305V Dr. Andersen
  • 2.
    How does currentclimate change compare to climate change in the geologic past? ● Sources of data on past climates ● Tree rings ● Glacial ice (and trapped air bubbles) ● Ocean sediments ● Coral reefs ● Current climate change much more rapid than anything seen in paleoclimate reconstructions
  • 3.
    Glacial and interglacialperiods during the Pleistocene
  • 4.
  • 5.
    Example: the PETM ● PETM = Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum ● About 50 million years ago ● During the Cenozoic ● About 10 million years after the dinosaurs went extinct ● Crocodiles and palm trees north of the Arctic Circle ● Temps on U.S. Gulf Coast averaged 80 degrees F (5 degrees hotter than currently), and varied about 9 degrees F across seasons (vary about 21 degrees across seasons currently) ● Ocean temperatures increased by 5 to 7 degrees C in about 10,000 years
  • 6.
    The PETM, II ● Apparently coincided with a global “burp” of carbon release equivalent to burning the rest of Earth's known fossil fuel reserves ● Possible that mild warming led to release of methane hydrates on ocean floor into the atmosphere ● Current rate of release of carbon into the atmosphere is about 10 times higher than during the PETM
  • 7.
    How is theclimate already changing? ● About 15,000 high-temperature records were broken during March 2012 ● As of 2010, the 15 warmest years on record since 1880 had all occurred within the previous 16 years ● Global average temperatures have risen about 0.7 degrees C since 1957 (a very good year)
  • 8.
    Each decade getswarmer Remember the carbon dioxide measurements from Mauna Loa? Connect the dots.
  • 9.
    What impacts ofclimate change are already being seen? Some eastern North American tree species migrating northward 1 km per year. (Woodall et al 2009) Around James Bay in Canada, the permafrost line has receded 130 km in the last 50 years. (Payette & Huppe 2010)
  • 10.
    How much canwe expect temperatures to rise through the end of this century? ● Current IPCC projections are for 2 – 11 degrees F increase in global average ● Regional changes may be less or greater ● Temperature increases for the U.S. Expected to be about 30% higher than average ● The Arctic is expected to warm up the most, and is already warming at twice the global average rate
  • 11.
    What about sealevels? ● Not rising because of melting sea ice, but continental ice (Greenland and Antarctica – above sea level) ● Sea level could rise by 1.5 to 6 feet by the end of the century ● Bangladesh will lose 17.5% of its land area if sea level rises 3 feet ● The Maldives and other island chains may disappear completely
  • 12.
    th Sea level risein the 20 century
  • 13.
    Impacts on precipitation ● Higher temperatures → more evaporation ● Faster hydrologic cycle ● More rainfall in some places, less in others ● In general, less rain on either side of the equator, more in high latitudes ● Less snow in the mountain West will impact ● Fish populations ● Hydropower ● Recreation ● Municipal and agricultural water availability
  • 14.
    Hydrology ● Altered annual streamflows ● Changes in timing of runoff ● Changes in relative length of low-flow and high-flow conditions ● Different watersheds differentially vulnerable (Null et al. 2010, PloS ONE 5(4)) ● Current reservoirs, canals etc. built for current conditions, not future conditions
  • 15.
  • 16.
    Wildfire regimes willchange ● 10% to 50% increase in fire activity across North America by 2050 ● Effects of fire on vegetation may overshadow direct effects of climate change on distribution, abundance, and dispersal (Flannigan et al., 2000, Science of the Total Environment, 262:221-229) ● Increases in fire frequency in some regions may be balanced out by decrease in others ● Still, expect substantial change in global fire regimes (Krawchuk et al., 2009, PloS ONE 4(4))
  • 17.
    Changing fire regimeswill impact society ● Increases in ● Fuel load ● Ignition rate ● Fire intensity ● Length of fire season ● May overwhelm agency fire response and suppression capabilities (Podur & Wotton, 2010, Ecol. Modell. 221(9): 1301-1309)
  • 18.
    Potential for cropfailures ● Agriculture throughout Africa runs some risk of negative impacts from climate change ● Existing cropping systems and infrastructure not sufficient to meet current demand (Muller et al., 2011, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 108(11):4313-4315) ● Regions with highest food insecurity (South Asia and Southern Africa) face greatest risk of reduced yield and crop failure (Lobell et al., 2008, Science 319(5863):607-610)
  • 19.
    Mechanisms and severityof crop failures ● Simulation studies of spring wheat in northeastern China ● Increased crop failure rates under future climate – Thermal stress – Water stress ● Maximum failure rates increase more rapidly than median failure rates (Challinor et al., 2010, Env. Res. Lett. 5(3): 034012)
  • 20.
    Mitigating crop failures ● Farmers can protect themselves from some of the effects of climate change by planting a more diverse array of crops (Lin, 2011, BioScience 61(3):183-193) ● Even crops thought to be heat-tolerant may be more sensitive to rising temperature than we expect ● 1C temp. increase → yield loss in 65% of African maize-growing region (Lobell et al., 2011, Nature Climate Change, doi:10.1038/nclimate1043)
  • 21.
    The impacts arenot limited to land- based food production ● Impacts on anadromous fish ● Warmer temperatures ● Earlier peak stream flow (Martins et al., 2011, Global Change Biology, 17(1):99-114) ● Impacts on marine fisheries ● Temperature ● Salinity changes (particularly in coastal fisheries with nearshore/estuarine spawning) (Lindegren et al., 2010, Proc. Roy Soc. B 277(1691):2121-2130) (Hare et al., 2010, Ecol. Appl. 20(2):452-464)
  • 22.
    Climate change impactson ecosystems ● The growing season in parts of the Northern Hemisphere became two weeks longer in the second half of the 20th century ● Spring is coming earlier in both hemispheres ● Longer growing seasons impact ● Pollinators ● Migratory birds ● Pests (also influenced by milder winters) ● Water availability (more evaporation and transpiration)
  • 23.
    Observed climate changeimpacts on species are consistent with predicted impacts 1) Phenology Walther et al 2002 Parmesan & Yohe 2003 Doswald et al 2009 2) Range shifts Parmesan et al 1999 Parmesan & Yohe 2003 Tingley et al 2009 3) Other effects Laurance 2008 Boersma et al 2009
  • 24.
    We can modelthe way in which current (and future) geographic ranges depend on climate + = ? 1. Bioclimatic envelope models based on Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt) criteria 2. Habitat-based approach
  • 25.
    Bioclimatic envelope modelscombine the answers to two simple questions 1. What are the climatic conditions in which a species is currently found? Climate data: PRISM, WorldClim, ClimateWizard Occurrence data: GBIF, Natural Heritage programs 2. Where will those conditions be found in the future? GCM predictions + = ?
  • 26.
    MaxEnt provides parsimoniousestimation of bioclimatic envelopes Machine learning algorithm to estimate geographic distributions under current and future conditions Phillips et al 2006 Baldwin & Bender 2007 Phillips & Dudik 2008 + = ?
  • 27.
    Bioclimatic models predicthabitat loss in the American Pika (Ochotona princeps) l Regional losses of 53% to 71% across 5 regions (Calkins MS thesis, NMSU, 2010)
  • 28.
    Bioclimatic models predictpatterns of habitat loss in European bats l Northern species more likely to suffer losses than temperate and Mediterranean species Rebelo et al 2010
  • 29.
    A mixed approachpredicts species distributions based on the distributions of habitats 1. Use MaxEnt to predict future distributions of habitat types Relies on Gap Analysis Project landcover data 2. Overlay existing deductive animal distribution models on future habitat distributions Relies on Gap Analysis Project animal distribution models + + = ?
  • 30.
    Mixed approach predictscomplex habitat loss pattern for swift fox (Vulpes velox) Complex response of grassland habitats to future climate scenarios. C3 grasses have advantage at elevated CO2 C4 grasses prefer warmer temperatures Redman et al MS
  • 31.
    Climate change threatsto biodiversity ● Globally, 15% - 37% of species “committed to extinction” due to climate change alone, not including effects of other factors (Thomas et al 2004, Nature 427:145 – 148) ● Effects of climate change on biodiversity by year 2100 likely to be exceeded only by effects of land-use changes (Sala et al . 2000, Science 287:1770-1774)
  • 32.
    How do predictions of future precipitation distributions match up with what we know about global patterns of atmospheric circulation (Hadley cells etc.) ● How do paleoclimate studies help us to understand and prepare for future climate change? ● How might rising sea levels influence patterns of human immigration? ● How might some of these impacts interact in unexpected ways?