From the 2020 NACD Annual Meeting.
S.T.A.R. (Saving Tomorrow’s Agriculture Resources) is an innovative program that provides a free evaluation tool to increase stewardship on farms through outreach and technical assistance. S.T.A.R. evaluates and verifies adoption of field-level conservation practices and encourages continuous improvement through value chain incentives.
Food hubs are businesses that aggregate and market regional food. Their numbers have grown from 107 in 2013 to 151 in 2015. Food hubs suppliers and customers are almost entirely regional. Food hubs help small and medium agricultural operations and strive to increase community food access and health outcomes. The average operating expense ratio for food hubs was 0.88 in 2015, down from 1.09 in 2013. Current fruit and vegetable production will need to vastly increase, with projections of needing over 5.6 million small farms by 2020 and over 7 million by 2050, to meet increased demand if consumption rises in line with dietary guidelines.
This document discusses strategies for improving conservation practice adoption based on research by Linda Stalker Prokopy. It addresses three main problems: selecting watersheds to work in, getting people engaged in watershed management, and reaching individual farmers. For the first problem, the document advocates focusing on watersheds with conditions more likely to lead to success, such as having paid staff and engaged conservation groups. For the second problem, the document highlights the importance of partnerships, funding, and engaging local stakeholders. For the third problem, the document discusses how farmer characteristics, social networks, and practice compatibility influence adoption and maintenance of conservation practices.
Farmer-led research on water quality protection practices has been conducted on 20 farms over 15 years, involving 15 member steering committees. Called Discovery Farms, the program has collected a large dataset on diverse farm systems and locations. The research focuses on runoff, sediment, nitrogen, phosphorus, weather, and soil factors. Discovery Farms engages farmers in leadership roles and communicates credible water quality research results. It works with farmers at multiple scales and land uses, with an open approach rather than preconceived solutions. The future involves deeper farmer engagement through assessment tools for soil health, nitrogen use efficiency, and edge-of-field runoff data.
Water Quality Initiatives for Small Iowa Beef and Dairy Feedlot Operations (S...LPE Learning Center
Proceedings available at: http://www.extension.org/67682
Traditionally, small feedlots and dairies have not been engaged in environmental regulations and awareness in Iowa due to the environmental focus being directed at large feedlots and confinement feeding operations. Many small feedlot and dairy managers do not even recognize or admit that regulations do apply to their livestock operation. This effort primarily uses traditional extension outreach methods, field days and publications, to raise awareness. Unique to this outreach effort are the goal to provide a producer network to share information and ideas to learn more about manure runoff control structures and best management practices to reduce impacts on water quality, and the focus on controls beyond minimum rule requirements, but tailored to small operations.
This talk will discuss some of the challenges faced by small feedlot producers, identification of parameters to help producers overcome some of these challenges, and methods and educational materials aimed at helping raise environmental awareness and foster action among these producers.
1) The document describes a decision support tool being developed to increase farmer adoption of cover crops by demonstrating their short-term benefits for soil water and nitrogen conservation.
2) An on-farm network trial across 6 states is measuring factors like nitrate loss, infiltration rates, biomass production, and nitrogen content in cover crop and no-cover crop treatments.
3) Real-time data and modeling tools will provide farmers comparisons to help quantify cover crops' water retention and nitrogen contributions to subsequent cash crops. The goal is to overcome perceptions that cover crops reduce water and increase fertilizer needs.
This document summarizes information about the USDA's Conservation Innovation Grants (CIG) program. It discusses the two components of CIG - the CIG Classic pilot program and the new On-Farm Trials program established in the 2018 Farm Bill. Key details are provided about eligible projects and entities under each program, as well as funding amounts. Updates are also given on the 2019 application process and priorities for funding under CIG Classic and the new On-Farm Trials competition.
The document summarizes the Carbon Insetting Framework developed by the NRCS CIG partnership. The framework provides guidelines for carbon offset and insetting projects related to agriculture supply chains. It establishes protocols for quantifying greenhouse gas reductions from conservation practices like cover crops and no-till using models. The framework is being validated using on-farm trials through the Soil Health Partnership network across the Midwest. Verification of practice implementation and carbon reductions will utilize the OpTIS system for mapping tillage, crops and residues over time across wide areas.
- Entitlement amounts for USDA Foods are calculated based on the number of meals served in the previous year. More meals served means more entitlement dollars. The initial entitlement amount for the school year is an estimate based on the previous year's meal counts.
- Entitlement amounts may change after final meal counts are reconciled at the end of the federal fiscal year. Previously, this adjustment was applied to district balances in the spring. Now it will be applied to the following school year's entitlement up front.
- Districts can check their current entitlement balance on the CNP2000 system. They provide a survey each year to indicate what USDA Foods they would like to receive to help the state order sufficient quantities
Food hubs are businesses that aggregate and market regional food. Their numbers have grown from 107 in 2013 to 151 in 2015. Food hubs suppliers and customers are almost entirely regional. Food hubs help small and medium agricultural operations and strive to increase community food access and health outcomes. The average operating expense ratio for food hubs was 0.88 in 2015, down from 1.09 in 2013. Current fruit and vegetable production will need to vastly increase, with projections of needing over 5.6 million small farms by 2020 and over 7 million by 2050, to meet increased demand if consumption rises in line with dietary guidelines.
This document discusses strategies for improving conservation practice adoption based on research by Linda Stalker Prokopy. It addresses three main problems: selecting watersheds to work in, getting people engaged in watershed management, and reaching individual farmers. For the first problem, the document advocates focusing on watersheds with conditions more likely to lead to success, such as having paid staff and engaged conservation groups. For the second problem, the document highlights the importance of partnerships, funding, and engaging local stakeholders. For the third problem, the document discusses how farmer characteristics, social networks, and practice compatibility influence adoption and maintenance of conservation practices.
Farmer-led research on water quality protection practices has been conducted on 20 farms over 15 years, involving 15 member steering committees. Called Discovery Farms, the program has collected a large dataset on diverse farm systems and locations. The research focuses on runoff, sediment, nitrogen, phosphorus, weather, and soil factors. Discovery Farms engages farmers in leadership roles and communicates credible water quality research results. It works with farmers at multiple scales and land uses, with an open approach rather than preconceived solutions. The future involves deeper farmer engagement through assessment tools for soil health, nitrogen use efficiency, and edge-of-field runoff data.
Water Quality Initiatives for Small Iowa Beef and Dairy Feedlot Operations (S...LPE Learning Center
Proceedings available at: http://www.extension.org/67682
Traditionally, small feedlots and dairies have not been engaged in environmental regulations and awareness in Iowa due to the environmental focus being directed at large feedlots and confinement feeding operations. Many small feedlot and dairy managers do not even recognize or admit that regulations do apply to their livestock operation. This effort primarily uses traditional extension outreach methods, field days and publications, to raise awareness. Unique to this outreach effort are the goal to provide a producer network to share information and ideas to learn more about manure runoff control structures and best management practices to reduce impacts on water quality, and the focus on controls beyond minimum rule requirements, but tailored to small operations.
This talk will discuss some of the challenges faced by small feedlot producers, identification of parameters to help producers overcome some of these challenges, and methods and educational materials aimed at helping raise environmental awareness and foster action among these producers.
1) The document describes a decision support tool being developed to increase farmer adoption of cover crops by demonstrating their short-term benefits for soil water and nitrogen conservation.
2) An on-farm network trial across 6 states is measuring factors like nitrate loss, infiltration rates, biomass production, and nitrogen content in cover crop and no-cover crop treatments.
3) Real-time data and modeling tools will provide farmers comparisons to help quantify cover crops' water retention and nitrogen contributions to subsequent cash crops. The goal is to overcome perceptions that cover crops reduce water and increase fertilizer needs.
This document summarizes information about the USDA's Conservation Innovation Grants (CIG) program. It discusses the two components of CIG - the CIG Classic pilot program and the new On-Farm Trials program established in the 2018 Farm Bill. Key details are provided about eligible projects and entities under each program, as well as funding amounts. Updates are also given on the 2019 application process and priorities for funding under CIG Classic and the new On-Farm Trials competition.
The document summarizes the Carbon Insetting Framework developed by the NRCS CIG partnership. The framework provides guidelines for carbon offset and insetting projects related to agriculture supply chains. It establishes protocols for quantifying greenhouse gas reductions from conservation practices like cover crops and no-till using models. The framework is being validated using on-farm trials through the Soil Health Partnership network across the Midwest. Verification of practice implementation and carbon reductions will utilize the OpTIS system for mapping tillage, crops and residues over time across wide areas.
- Entitlement amounts for USDA Foods are calculated based on the number of meals served in the previous year. More meals served means more entitlement dollars. The initial entitlement amount for the school year is an estimate based on the previous year's meal counts.
- Entitlement amounts may change after final meal counts are reconciled at the end of the federal fiscal year. Previously, this adjustment was applied to district balances in the spring. Now it will be applied to the following school year's entitlement up front.
- Districts can check their current entitlement balance on the CNP2000 system. They provide a survey each year to indicate what USDA Foods they would like to receive to help the state order sufficient quantities
The document discusses how edge of field monitoring data can better inform and improve predictive water quality models. It argues that making field data and model source code openly accessible in shared databases and model development communities would allow monitoring results to transform models through validation, calibration, and identification of missing processes. Agency leaders, researchers, and journals all have roles to play in making this transformation by incentivizing data sharing, open source modeling practices, and publications that demonstrate adequate data support.
This document describes the Sustainability Training in Agricultural Resources Systems (STARS) program, which aims to train extension agents and other agricultural professionals on sustainability topics so they can better assist farmers. The program held two regional workshops that covered issues like water and soil sustainability, wildlife habitat, and conservation systems. Agents reported increased knowledge after the workshops. Feedback was positive, though challenges include the broad scope of agriculture and competing demands on agents' time. The program seeks to improve consistent messaging and ensure its long-term sustainability.
Mapping suitable niche for cactus and legumes in diversified farming in drylandsICARDA
Presentation by Chandrashekhar Biradar and team.
16-18 October 2019. Hyderabad, India. TRUST: Humans, Machines & Ecosystems. This year’s Convention was hosted by The International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT). The Platform is led by the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) and the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
This document summarizes the role and impact of the University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources (UC ANR) program. It outlines how UC ANR works with agriculture to enhance productivity and health, provide tested production techniques, protect the environment, and support markets. It also describes UC ANR's organization, the economic importance of California agriculture, and how yields and food safety have increased through UC research and extension. However, budget cuts have reduced UC ANR personnel by 38% since 2000 and eliminated several programs. New industry partnerships help but public funding remains crucial to address challenges of feeding a growing population with less land and water.
This document discusses leveraging funding from multiple sources and partnerships to fund agricultural conservation practices in Delaware. It provides examples of stream and wetland restoration projects that blended funding from various government agencies, non-profits, and private groups. One project reconnected a channelized stream to its floodplain using funds from federal, state, and local partners. A farm restoration project received 66.3% of its funds from the state, 26.4% from a grant, and 7.3% from a non-point source program. The document also discusses using various cost-share programs to encourage farmers' use of cover crops, which is impacted by available funding, weather conditions, and policies.
Small Scale Irrigation Water Management: SI Assessment Framework for Systems ...africa-rising
Presented by Vara Prasad [Sustainable Intensification Innovation Lab - Kansas State University] about the small-scale irrigation water management SI assessment framework for system analyses. This poster was presented on 5 - 8 February 2019 at the Africa RISING Program Learning Event.
This document discusses tools for quantifying the outcomes of conservation practices related to climate and water quality. It provides context on why quantification is important, reviews 10 tools based on criteria like usability and functionality, and shares preliminary findings. The document recommends establishing standardized reporting requirements for field data to calibrate and validate models. It also discusses a new American Farmland Trust grant project that will quantify economic, soil health, water quality, and greenhouse gas outcomes of conservation practices using specific tools.
Presented by Getaneh K. Ayele, Charles F. Nicholson, Amy S. Collick, Seifu A. Tilahun and Tammo S. Steenhuise at the Nile Basin Development Challenge (NBDC) Science Workshop–2013, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 9 – 10 July 2013
Alexis Carlier - Animal Charity Evaluation - EA Global Melbourne 2015Adam Ford
Alexis discusses Animal Charity Evaluators, and cause prioritization applied to non-human animal charities.
He tackles 4 key questions:
a) Is animal advocacy an effective cause area?
b) Which part of animal advocacy should we focus on?
c) What are some top charities that deal with animal advocacy?
d) What can we do about the problem of animal suffering?
Please see his discussion on stage with Peter Singer too.
Animal Charity Evaluators: Our mission is to find and promote the most effective ways to help animals. We do this by analyzing research on methods of helping animals in order to provide research of interventions and top-charity recommendations; and by offering suggestions on being a more effective animal advocate by providing career, charity, and volunteering advice.
Bio: Alexis is a research intern at Animal Charity Evaluators, where he is preparing case studies for ACE’s ongoing Social Movements Project. His research has focuses on the children’s rights and tobacco control movements. Alexis has been a Youth Member of Parliament and a Youth Ambassador for UNICEF in New Zealand. He currently studies economics at the Toulouse School of Economics in France.
Timothy Kwiatkowski is a conservationist with over 10 years of experience in agriculture, water quality, and natural resource management in Northwest Ohio. He has worked for the Monroe Conservation District, National Center for Water Quality Research at Heidelberg University, Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Watercraft, and Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Natural Areas and Preserves. His roles have included assisting farmers to prevent agricultural pollution, water sampling and research, managing state scenic river programs, and authoring watershed management plans. He has numerous certifications in conservation planning and practices.
4R nutrient stewardship provides a framework to achieve cropping system goals – increased production, increased farmer profitability, enhanced environmental protection, and improved sustainability. To achieve those goals the 4Rs utilize fertilizer best management practices that address the Right Fertilizer Source, at the Right Application Rate, the Right Time for the plant to utilize the nutrients, and in the Right Place for optimal crop uptake. The four “rights” are necessary for sustainable plant nutrition management. The assessment of any planned nutrient management practice must consider the economic, social, and environmental effects to determine whether or not it is a “right” practice for that system.
The multilevel CSA monitoring set of standard core uptake and outcome indicators + expanded indicators linked to a rapid and reliable ICT based data collection instrument to systematically
assess and monitor:
- CSA Adoption/ Access to CIS
- CSA effects on food security and livelihoods household level)
- CSA effects on farm performance
Learn how to better manage agriculture resources with this basic overview of agg soil and water management. For more management information visit
http://www.plantdex.com
Where does the regional agronomic research stand on CSA, agro-ecology and sus...Francois Stepman
10 May 2021. Regenerative Agriculture vs. Agroecology: nomenclature hype or principle divergence?
(a) A decade of CSA: what are the achievements, the challenges and the bottlenecks? (b) What practical implications for smallholder farmers, agriculture and the environment?
Presentation by Jacques Wery – Director Research ICARDA
The document discusses the importance of nutrient management and the 4R nutrient stewardship framework (applying the right fertilizer source at the right rate, right time, and right place) for crop production and water quality. It notes several knowledge gaps around measuring nutrient loss and the impacts of various 4R practices. It also describes ongoing research projects and a new multi-state project that aim to quantify the effects of 4R practices on crop yields, nutrient losses to air and water, and soil health. The document advocates for farmer and advisor partnerships to promote 4R approaches and provides an example of improving yields and reducing costs through advanced 4R practices over time.
The Woods in Your Backyard: A Growing Issue and New Approachnacaa
The document summarizes a new educational manual called "The Woods in Your Backyard" that aims to educate small acreage landowners (1-10 acres) on managing their forested properties. It is disseminated through a train-the-trainer model using natural resource professionals and volunteers. The manual includes lessons on inventorying property, ecological principles, and developing a personalized management plan. Its goal is to positively impact water quality, wildlife, recreation and forest health through informed decision making. Assistance is not currently available to help with implementation, but as demand increases, more service providers may emerge to help landowners meet management goals.
The document evaluates how climate services provided to farmers in Rwanda through programs like Participatory Integrated Climate Services for Agriculture (PICSA) and Radio Listeners’ Clubs (RLC) have impacted women and men differently, finding that the programs have increased women's climate knowledge and participation in agricultural decision making, leading to perceived benefits like higher incomes, food security, and ability to cope with climate risks for both women and men farmers.
- Rhode Island has over 150,000 private well owners who are responsible for regularly testing and maintaining their drinking water wells. Many lack knowledge to make informed decisions to protect water quality.
- The URI Extension Water Quality Program aims to educate private well owners through community workshops, individual assistance, and intercept campaigns. Workshops have led 45% of attendees to test their well water and over 50% to adopt best practices like septic system maintenance.
- Program evaluation found workshops and outreach have effectively increased well testing rates and protection behaviors among private well owners in Rhode Island when complemented by easy-to-use resources and ongoing assistance. Partnerships are key to continued success.
This document summarizes social science research on farmers' perspectives regarding nutrient loss reduction efforts in Iowa. It finds that while many farmers are now aware of the Iowa Nutrient Reduction Strategy, there are still perceived barriers to implementation like costs, yield concerns, and lack of knowledge. The main sources of fertilizer information for farmers are dealers, but they are among the least likely to discuss the nutrient strategy. The research is informing ongoing efforts to raise awareness, address common barriers through research and incentives, and engage private sector advisors more directly. Continued surveys suggest commitment to making long-term progress on agriculture's impacts to water quality in Iowa.
This document summarizes a study on Iowa farmers' awareness of and willingness to support the Iowa Nutrient Reduction Strategy. The study found that while awareness of the strategy is growing, more needs to be done to build awareness of agriculture's impact on water quality and solutions. Farmers who were more knowledgeable and concerned about these issues expressed greater support for the strategy's goals. Trust in extension sources was also associated with higher support levels. However, farmers primarily rely on private sector advisors for farming decisions, so engaging those advisors will be important for promoting nutrient reduction practices. Continued dialogue and research on farmer perspectives will be important for making progress on water quality goals over time.
The document discusses how edge of field monitoring data can better inform and improve predictive water quality models. It argues that making field data and model source code openly accessible in shared databases and model development communities would allow monitoring results to transform models through validation, calibration, and identification of missing processes. Agency leaders, researchers, and journals all have roles to play in making this transformation by incentivizing data sharing, open source modeling practices, and publications that demonstrate adequate data support.
This document describes the Sustainability Training in Agricultural Resources Systems (STARS) program, which aims to train extension agents and other agricultural professionals on sustainability topics so they can better assist farmers. The program held two regional workshops that covered issues like water and soil sustainability, wildlife habitat, and conservation systems. Agents reported increased knowledge after the workshops. Feedback was positive, though challenges include the broad scope of agriculture and competing demands on agents' time. The program seeks to improve consistent messaging and ensure its long-term sustainability.
Mapping suitable niche for cactus and legumes in diversified farming in drylandsICARDA
Presentation by Chandrashekhar Biradar and team.
16-18 October 2019. Hyderabad, India. TRUST: Humans, Machines & Ecosystems. This year’s Convention was hosted by The International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT). The Platform is led by the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) and the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
This document summarizes the role and impact of the University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources (UC ANR) program. It outlines how UC ANR works with agriculture to enhance productivity and health, provide tested production techniques, protect the environment, and support markets. It also describes UC ANR's organization, the economic importance of California agriculture, and how yields and food safety have increased through UC research and extension. However, budget cuts have reduced UC ANR personnel by 38% since 2000 and eliminated several programs. New industry partnerships help but public funding remains crucial to address challenges of feeding a growing population with less land and water.
This document discusses leveraging funding from multiple sources and partnerships to fund agricultural conservation practices in Delaware. It provides examples of stream and wetland restoration projects that blended funding from various government agencies, non-profits, and private groups. One project reconnected a channelized stream to its floodplain using funds from federal, state, and local partners. A farm restoration project received 66.3% of its funds from the state, 26.4% from a grant, and 7.3% from a non-point source program. The document also discusses using various cost-share programs to encourage farmers' use of cover crops, which is impacted by available funding, weather conditions, and policies.
Small Scale Irrigation Water Management: SI Assessment Framework for Systems ...africa-rising
Presented by Vara Prasad [Sustainable Intensification Innovation Lab - Kansas State University] about the small-scale irrigation water management SI assessment framework for system analyses. This poster was presented on 5 - 8 February 2019 at the Africa RISING Program Learning Event.
This document discusses tools for quantifying the outcomes of conservation practices related to climate and water quality. It provides context on why quantification is important, reviews 10 tools based on criteria like usability and functionality, and shares preliminary findings. The document recommends establishing standardized reporting requirements for field data to calibrate and validate models. It also discusses a new American Farmland Trust grant project that will quantify economic, soil health, water quality, and greenhouse gas outcomes of conservation practices using specific tools.
Presented by Getaneh K. Ayele, Charles F. Nicholson, Amy S. Collick, Seifu A. Tilahun and Tammo S. Steenhuise at the Nile Basin Development Challenge (NBDC) Science Workshop–2013, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 9 – 10 July 2013
Alexis Carlier - Animal Charity Evaluation - EA Global Melbourne 2015Adam Ford
Alexis discusses Animal Charity Evaluators, and cause prioritization applied to non-human animal charities.
He tackles 4 key questions:
a) Is animal advocacy an effective cause area?
b) Which part of animal advocacy should we focus on?
c) What are some top charities that deal with animal advocacy?
d) What can we do about the problem of animal suffering?
Please see his discussion on stage with Peter Singer too.
Animal Charity Evaluators: Our mission is to find and promote the most effective ways to help animals. We do this by analyzing research on methods of helping animals in order to provide research of interventions and top-charity recommendations; and by offering suggestions on being a more effective animal advocate by providing career, charity, and volunteering advice.
Bio: Alexis is a research intern at Animal Charity Evaluators, where he is preparing case studies for ACE’s ongoing Social Movements Project. His research has focuses on the children’s rights and tobacco control movements. Alexis has been a Youth Member of Parliament and a Youth Ambassador for UNICEF in New Zealand. He currently studies economics at the Toulouse School of Economics in France.
Timothy Kwiatkowski is a conservationist with over 10 years of experience in agriculture, water quality, and natural resource management in Northwest Ohio. He has worked for the Monroe Conservation District, National Center for Water Quality Research at Heidelberg University, Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Watercraft, and Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Natural Areas and Preserves. His roles have included assisting farmers to prevent agricultural pollution, water sampling and research, managing state scenic river programs, and authoring watershed management plans. He has numerous certifications in conservation planning and practices.
4R nutrient stewardship provides a framework to achieve cropping system goals – increased production, increased farmer profitability, enhanced environmental protection, and improved sustainability. To achieve those goals the 4Rs utilize fertilizer best management practices that address the Right Fertilizer Source, at the Right Application Rate, the Right Time for the plant to utilize the nutrients, and in the Right Place for optimal crop uptake. The four “rights” are necessary for sustainable plant nutrition management. The assessment of any planned nutrient management practice must consider the economic, social, and environmental effects to determine whether or not it is a “right” practice for that system.
The multilevel CSA monitoring set of standard core uptake and outcome indicators + expanded indicators linked to a rapid and reliable ICT based data collection instrument to systematically
assess and monitor:
- CSA Adoption/ Access to CIS
- CSA effects on food security and livelihoods household level)
- CSA effects on farm performance
Learn how to better manage agriculture resources with this basic overview of agg soil and water management. For more management information visit
http://www.plantdex.com
Where does the regional agronomic research stand on CSA, agro-ecology and sus...Francois Stepman
10 May 2021. Regenerative Agriculture vs. Agroecology: nomenclature hype or principle divergence?
(a) A decade of CSA: what are the achievements, the challenges and the bottlenecks? (b) What practical implications for smallholder farmers, agriculture and the environment?
Presentation by Jacques Wery – Director Research ICARDA
The document discusses the importance of nutrient management and the 4R nutrient stewardship framework (applying the right fertilizer source at the right rate, right time, and right place) for crop production and water quality. It notes several knowledge gaps around measuring nutrient loss and the impacts of various 4R practices. It also describes ongoing research projects and a new multi-state project that aim to quantify the effects of 4R practices on crop yields, nutrient losses to air and water, and soil health. The document advocates for farmer and advisor partnerships to promote 4R approaches and provides an example of improving yields and reducing costs through advanced 4R practices over time.
The Woods in Your Backyard: A Growing Issue and New Approachnacaa
The document summarizes a new educational manual called "The Woods in Your Backyard" that aims to educate small acreage landowners (1-10 acres) on managing their forested properties. It is disseminated through a train-the-trainer model using natural resource professionals and volunteers. The manual includes lessons on inventorying property, ecological principles, and developing a personalized management plan. Its goal is to positively impact water quality, wildlife, recreation and forest health through informed decision making. Assistance is not currently available to help with implementation, but as demand increases, more service providers may emerge to help landowners meet management goals.
The document evaluates how climate services provided to farmers in Rwanda through programs like Participatory Integrated Climate Services for Agriculture (PICSA) and Radio Listeners’ Clubs (RLC) have impacted women and men differently, finding that the programs have increased women's climate knowledge and participation in agricultural decision making, leading to perceived benefits like higher incomes, food security, and ability to cope with climate risks for both women and men farmers.
- Rhode Island has over 150,000 private well owners who are responsible for regularly testing and maintaining their drinking water wells. Many lack knowledge to make informed decisions to protect water quality.
- The URI Extension Water Quality Program aims to educate private well owners through community workshops, individual assistance, and intercept campaigns. Workshops have led 45% of attendees to test their well water and over 50% to adopt best practices like septic system maintenance.
- Program evaluation found workshops and outreach have effectively increased well testing rates and protection behaviors among private well owners in Rhode Island when complemented by easy-to-use resources and ongoing assistance. Partnerships are key to continued success.
This document summarizes social science research on farmers' perspectives regarding nutrient loss reduction efforts in Iowa. It finds that while many farmers are now aware of the Iowa Nutrient Reduction Strategy, there are still perceived barriers to implementation like costs, yield concerns, and lack of knowledge. The main sources of fertilizer information for farmers are dealers, but they are among the least likely to discuss the nutrient strategy. The research is informing ongoing efforts to raise awareness, address common barriers through research and incentives, and engage private sector advisors more directly. Continued surveys suggest commitment to making long-term progress on agriculture's impacts to water quality in Iowa.
This document summarizes a study on Iowa farmers' awareness of and willingness to support the Iowa Nutrient Reduction Strategy. The study found that while awareness of the strategy is growing, more needs to be done to build awareness of agriculture's impact on water quality and solutions. Farmers who were more knowledgeable and concerned about these issues expressed greater support for the strategy's goals. Trust in extension sources was also associated with higher support levels. However, farmers primarily rely on private sector advisors for farming decisions, so engaging those advisors will be important for promoting nutrient reduction practices. Continued dialogue and research on farmer perspectives will be important for making progress on water quality goals over time.
The document provides an overview of the Big Pine Creek Watershed Project, which aims to reduce nutrient runoff into waterways through agricultural conservation practices. It discusses the project's history and partners, including government agencies and private companies. The project has received over $3 million in funding to implement practices like cover crops and nutrient management plans. It also outlines opportunities for public-private partnerships to enhance conservation delivery through agricultural retailers. The project aims to serve as a model for integrating conservation into the agricultural supply chain.
Organic System Plans: Market Farms and GreenhousesElisaMendelsohn
This document provides an example organic system plan for a hypothetical 22-acre market farm called Wannabee's Organic Farm located in Arkansas. The farm map shows the layout of the farm including 16 small production fields labeled A-1 through A-8 and B-1 through B-8. It also shows the location of greenhouses, buildings, wells, buffers, and neighboring conventional farms. Field notes provide additional details on field uses and history. The application form that follows will provide details on the farm's production practices to demonstrate compliance with USDA organic regulations.
Completing Your Application for Organic CertificationElisaMendelsohn
This document provides an example organic system plan for a hypothetical 22-acre market farm called Wannabee's Organic Farm located in Arkansas. The farm map shows the layout of the farm including 16 small vegetable fields labeled A-1 through A-8 and B-1 through B-8. It also shows 5 transitional blueberry fields labeled S-1 through S-6, forest land for wildcrafting labeled F, buildings, access lanes, and adjoining conventional farms. Buffer zones are maintained around all organic fields.
The document summarizes changes in agriculture in Southern New England, specifically Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island. Key points include:
- The number of farms has increased slightly but average farm size has decreased in all three states between 1997-2012.
- Agriculture contributes billions to the economies of each state and employs tens of thousands of people.
- Challenges include balancing agriculture with other land uses and regulations, farmland preservation, and supporting new/beginning farmers.
- Opportunities include recognizing agriculture as economic development and ensuring local regulations consider production agriculture needs.
The document discusses the EPA's promotion of market-based approaches like water quality trading to improve water quality at lower costs. It outlines the EPA's water quality trading policy principles and funding opportunities for innovative projects. The EPA will continue to work with states and stakeholders using tools like the Clean Water Act's Section 319 grant program to support watershed projects addressing nonpoint source pollution like excess nutrients.
Completing Your Application for Organic CertificationGardening
This organic system plan provides details for Andy and Suzi Wannabee's 22-acre diversified organic farm in Arkansas. The farm includes vegetable crops, small fruits, greenhouse production, and wild ginseng harvest. A map shows the farm layout including 15 fields, buffer areas, buildings, and adjoining land uses. Field histories dating back to 2003 are also provided to document the transition of fields to organic production.
Organic System Plans: Market Farms and GreenhousesGardening
This organic system plan provides details for Andy and Suzi Wannabee's 22-acre diversified organic farm in Arkansas. The farm includes vegetable crops, small fruits, greenhouse production, and wild ginseng harvest. A map shows the farm layout including 15 fields, buffer areas, buildings, and adjoining land uses. Field histories dating back to 2003 are also provided to document the transition of fields to organic production.
This document summarizes the history and work of Conservation Marketplace Midwest (CMM), a nonprofit organization that seeks to establish new economic opportunities for conservation. It discusses CMM's initial focus on water quality credit trading, which declined as environmental markets weakened. CMM then adjusted its focus to developing local markets for emerging issues like wellhead protection and pollinator habitat. It outlines CMM's tools to quantify ecosystem services from practices like increased soil organic matter and water storage. The document also describes CMM's role in a corporate supply chain sustainability program called Field Stewards.
This document provides an overview and agenda for the Soil Health CIG Symposium. It discusses a project conducted by American Farmland Trust to quantify the economic, environmental, and soil health outcomes of conservation practices on four farms located in California, Illinois, Ohio, and New York. The project utilized partial budget analysis, the Nutrient Tracking Tool, and the COMET-Farm Tool to analyze impacts. Key findings included yield increases, higher net incomes, reduced input costs, and improvements to water quality and greenhouse gas emissions from the soil health practices. The document outlines the project objectives, methods, case studies developed, and plans to disseminate results to farmers and conservation partners.
The document summarizes a water quality monitoring project in the School Branch watershed in Indiana. The objective is to document how soil health management systems used in production agriculture, such as no-till, cover crops, and nutrient management, can improve water resources. The project involves continuous automatic edge-of-field and in-stream water quality monitoring, as well as soils and plant analysis. Key questions center around nutrient and sediment loads from fields using soil health practices, and biological responses in streams with different agricultural land use. Partners include farmers, universities, NRCS, USGS, and local conservation organizations.
The document discusses source water protection and partnerships between drinking water utilities and USDA conservation programs. It summarizes that the 2018 Farm Bill directs 10% of NRCS conservation funding towards source water protection. NRCS has source water protection pilots through 2024 requiring consultation with state drinking water programs. The webinar highlighted NRCS programs like the National Water Quality Initiative and Regional Conservation Partnership Program that leverage partnerships for projects that benefit source water.
The document summarizes a project working with farmers in East Central Illinois to adopt nutrient management practices through partnerships and funding from various organizations. The project uses EQIP funding to promote practices like nutrient management, cover crops, and drainage water management. It also establishes a BMP Challenge to encourage reduced tillage, nutrient management, and other practices. Water quality is monitored through drainage tile and surface water sampling. GIS mapping tracks cropping history, soils, and conservation practices in the watershed. The Cooperative Conservation Program Initiative leverages resources for targeted conservation benefit and learning lessons.
Landscape Capacity Analysis For Ventura CountyEcotrust
An 18-month research project conducted in Ventura County analyzed the landscape's capacity for agriculture. The project used 700 datasets and GIS analysis tools to project scenarios for 2030 based on population growth, available agricultural lands, agro-ecological zones, value chain placement, and indicators. The goal was to understand how to organize food production, distribution, and consumption to have positive social, environmental, and local economic impacts and maximize the landscape's ability to feed the population.
Effects of Federal Conservation Payments on Fertilizer-use in the MidwestRural Soc
Fertilizer use on agricultural land contributes to both nutrient pollution of surface and ground water as well as to global climate change. Voluntary conservation programs run by the USDA encourage farmers to reduce their use of fertilizers and to adopt practices and technologies that reduce nutrient run-off, but do the funds that go into these programs have the desired effect? OLS regression analysis was used to estimate the effect of federal conservation subsidies on both the number of farmland acres treated with fertilizer and the number of farms that reported using conservation practices. The analysis uses county level data for Michigan, Illinois and Iowa from the 2007 Census of Agriculture and subsidy data obtained by the Environmental Working Group from the USDA. Conservation subsidies are found to have a significant, negative effect on the acres of farmland treated with fertilizer and a significant, positive effect on the number of farms using conservation practices. Crop insurance subsidies are also found to have a large, significant and positive effect on acres fertilized. Variables such as average farmer age, number of female operators, average farm size, number of organic acres, number of irrigated acres and number of rented acres per county are not found to be significant. This analysis has substantial implications for achieving conservation outcomes though agricultural policies because it highlights ways that production policies can work at counter purposes to the goals of conservation programs.
Improving Surface and Ground Water Quality via Agricultural Lands: Two Lancas...Kim Beidler
This document provides two case studies on improving surface and ground water quality through agricultural best management practices (BMPs) in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania.
The first case study describes a BMP assessment conducted in West Lampeter Township, where farms over 10 acres were visited to document existing BMPs and identify opportunities for improved water quality and farmer partnerships. Over 50% of identified BMPs were not documented in conservation plans. The assessment results will help identify priority areas for implementing additional BMPs.
The second case study outlines a source water protection collaborative for Eastern Lancaster County, where high nitrate levels threaten drinking water sources. An education workshop attracted 400 farmers. An agricultural committee is facilitating ongoing farmer outreach and free well testing, with a
Evaluation of Community Gardens
`
For more information, Please see websites below:
`
Organic Edible Schoolyards & Gardening with Children =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851214 ~
`
Double Food Production from your School Garden with Organic Tech =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851079 ~
`
Free School Gardening Art Posters =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851159 ~
`
Increase Food Production with Companion Planting in your School Garden =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851159 ~
`
Healthy Foods Dramatically Improves Student Academic Success =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851348 ~
`
City Chickens for your Organic School Garden =
http://scribd.com/doc/239850440 ~
`
Simple Square Foot Gardening for Schools - Teacher Guide =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851110 ~
Similar to Champaign County Soil & Water Conservation District - Revolutionizing Conservation (20)
The document contains multiple repetitions of the phrase "Share your photos with #NACD2024" tagged with various organizations and individuals such as the Nebraska's Natural Resources District, North Carolina Association of SWCDs, Association of Illinois SWCDs, Georgia Association of CDs, Kentucky Association of CDs, Oklahoma County Conservation District, and Bill & Becky Dunn. It appears to be promoting sharing photos from an event using the hashtag #NACD2024.
Symposium Session Slides
Putting Farmers at the Center of Regenerative Agriculture Engagement Planning – Deborah Carter McCoy, Rebecca Bartels, and Suzy Friedman with the Midwest Row Crop Collaborative, Trust In Food, and the WWF will lead a planning process based on insights from their behavior change research to accelerate regenerative agriculture acceptance by producers. The panelists will be Deborah Carter McCoy from Environmental Initiative, Rebecca Bartels from Trust In Food, and Suzy Friedman from the World Wildlife Fund.
Wednesday, February 14, 8:30 - 11:00 a.m.
Breakout Session Slides
Conservation Delivery in Pacific Island Communities – Mae Nakahata discusses experiences with building support capacity and technologies that are scaled/adapted to serve the non-traditional agriculture systems of Pacific Islands will be shared. CNMI, GU & HI – led presentation.
Monday, February 12, 4:00 - 4:25 p.m.
Breakout Session Slide Pt. 2
Advancing Producer Engagement and MMRV in Ecosystem Services Markets: Lessons Learned from Three Years Conducting Projects – Alana Pacheco and Lars Dyrud will highlight three years of lessons learned from ESMC’s Eco-Harvest market projects and discuss program specifics, opportunities for participation, and private sector advancement of reduced soil sampling costs through the latest in MMRV.
Tuesday, February 13, 2:20 - 3:00 p.m.
Breakout Session Slide Pt. 1
Advancing Producer Engagement and MMRV in Ecosystem Services Markets: Lessons Learned from Three Years Conducting Projects – Alana Pacheco and Lars Dyrud will highlight three years of lessons learned from ESMC’s Eco-Harvest market projects and discuss program specifics, opportunities for participation, and private sector advancement of reduced soil sampling costs through the latest in MMRV.
Tuesday, February 13, 2:20 - 3:00 p.m.
Breakout Session Slides Pt. 3
Converging Ag Drainage with Water Quality – Mike Libben discusses how the Ottawa SWCD (Ohio) has blended the need for agricultural drainage and increased water quality for Lake Erie by integrating projects that accomplish both goals and brings partners together.
Tuesday, February 13, 1:30 - 2:10 p.m.
*Due to the size of the powerpoint, this was uploaded as three separate powerpoints. This is the third one, please continue to the other two for the full presentation*
Breakout Session Slides Pt. 2
Converging Ag Drainage with Water Quality – Mike Libben discusses how the Ottawa SWCD (Ohio) has blended the need for agricultural drainage and increased water quality for Lake Erie by integrating projects that accomplish both goals and brings partners together.
Tuesday, February 13, 1:30 - 2:10 p.m.
*Due to the size of the powerpoint, this was uploaded as three separate powerpoints. This is the second one, please continue to the other two for the full presentation*
Breakout Session Slides Pt. 1
Converging Ag Drainage with Water Quality – Mike Libben discusses how the Ottawa SWCD (Ohio) has blended the need for agricultural drainage and increased water quality for Lake Erie by integrating projects that accomplish both goals and brings partners together.
Tuesday, February 13, 1:30 - 2:10 p.m.
*Due to the size of the powerpoint, this was uploaded as three separate powerpoints. This is the first one, please continue to the next two for the full presentation*
Breakout Session Slides
OpTIS: New National Baseline Data for Climate-Smart Ag – David Gustafson discusses how no-till and cover crops are leading climate-smart practices, which OpTIS tracks using satellite data. This session will feature the latest OpTIS release, which includes data for all lower 48 states.
Tuesday, February 13, 1:30 - 2:10 p.m.
Breakout Session Slides
Carbon Sequestration and Soil Health – Andrea Kreiner and Jan Lee discuss the website OACD prepared on soil health & carbon sequestration with researched information, links to tools and articles; and an accompanying guidebook for district use in working with sequestration.
Monday, February 12, 4:00 - 4:25 p.m.
Breakout Session Slides
Dirty Water Bugs Us! Pesticide Education for Urban Communities – Lynn Pilewski discusses how the GCSWCD has modified PuttSkee, an interactive game, to educate urban citizens on safe use of insecticides and herbicides. The activity, paired with simple messaging, has been effective and engaging.
Tuesday, February 13 3:30 - 4:10 p.m.
Breakout Session Slides
Climate Adapted Native Plant Materials Project: Practical Innovation for an Uncertain Future – Mike Conroy will discuss how the Tualatin SWCD is evaluating assisted migration to augment the genetic fitness of native plants used in restoration projects. The core of this project is a long-term common garden experiment.
Monday, February 12 3:05 - 3:30 p.m.
Breakout Session Slides
Scaling Agroforestry in US Agriculture – Maya Glicksman will define agroforestry, discuss new opportunities to support agroforestry adoption, and highlight areas for continued advocacy administratively and legislatively.
Monday, February 12, 3:05 - 3:30 p.m.
Breakout Session Slides
Maximum Partnerships: Building Partnership between National Programs and Local Implementation – Jessia McGuire and Drew Larsen discussed how PF and QF partnership staff (Precision Ag Conservation Specialist, Farm Bill / Coordinating Biologist, Habitat Specialist, Range Conservationist, & Outreach Coordinator) provide needed capacity in many areas of the country to address resource needs. The session focused on sharing the many opportunities for partnering to impact agriculture and local resource concerns and better serve cooperators as well as maximize the value of existing partnerships.
Tuesday, February 13 4:20 - 5:00 p.m.
Breakout Session Slides
Encouraging Urban Green Infrastructure Practices for Climate Resiliency – Jennifer Fish will discuss how Green Infrastructure above the minimum stormwater standards is important to community sustainability. This includes designing for future storm events and better using existing environmental services.
Monday, February 12, 2:30 - 2:55 p.m.
Breakout Session Slides
Community Outreach Through Nontraditional Ag Farmer to Farmer Coffee Talks – Sharon Autry will discuss Nontraditional Ag Farmer to Farmer Coffee Talks, which cover topics that are relevant to small/medium scale producers and offer an opportunity to build community and collaboration.
Monday, February 12 3:05 - 3:30 p.m.
Breakout Session Slides
Bridging the Gap: A Partnership Between an Ag Retailer and Local Government – Kolby Beehler discusses how the Morrison SWCD partnered with a local agricultural retailer on a joint conservation agronomist position. Two years later they have had achievements and challenges and want to share their experiences.
Tuesday, February 13, 3:30 - 4:10 p.m.
Breakout Session Slides
Unconventional Partnering – The Voluntary Stewardship Program, CDs, and Counties – Bill Eller discusses conservation district partners with non-traditional regulatory partners (counties) to replace critical area protection regulations with voluntary, incentive-based practices.
Monday, February 12 4:35 - 5:00 p.m.
Breakout Session Slides
Water Quality of Life – Jim Hess discusses how the Elkhart County SWCD has taken conservation to the next level and is offering property tax incentives for the “Good Stewards of the Land”. Please read the 2022 NACD Annual Report page 39-40.
Monday, February 12 4:00 - 4:25 p.m.
Breakout Session Slides
Making Connections Maximizes Watershed Restoration Project – Lynn Pilewski and Kirsten Robertson will discuss how one group assembled a wide array of non-profit, governmental, and private companies to work together to fund and implement a multi-faceted watershed plan in South Carolina.
Monday, February 12, 3:05 - 3:30 p.m.
More from National Association of Conservation Districts (20)
Trichogramma spp. is an efficient egg parasitoids that potentially assist to manage the insect-pests from the field condition by parasiting the host eggs. To mass culture this egg parasitoids effectively, we need to culture another stored grain pest- Rice Meal Moth (Corcyra Cephalonica). After rearing this pest, the eggs of Corcyra will carry the potential Trichogramma spp., which is an Hymenopteran Wasp. The detailed Methodologies of rearing both Corcyra Cephalonica and Trichogramma spp. have described on this ppt.
Optimizing Post Remediation Groundwater Performance with Enhanced Microbiolog...Joshua Orris
Results of geophysics and pneumatic injection pilot tests during 2003 – 2007 yielded significant positive results for injection delivery design and contaminant mass treatment, resulting in permanent shut-down of an existing groundwater Pump & Treat system.
Accessible source areas were subsequently removed (2011) by soil excavation and treated with the placement of Emulsified Vegetable Oil EVO and zero-valent iron ZVI to accelerate treatment of impacted groundwater in overburden and weathered fractured bedrock. Post pilot test and post remediation groundwater monitoring has included analyses of CVOCs, organic fatty acids, dissolved gases and QuantArray® -Chlor to quantify key microorganisms (e.g., Dehalococcoides, Dehalobacter, etc.) and functional genes (e.g., vinyl chloride reductase, methane monooxygenase, etc.) to assess potential for reductive dechlorination and aerobic cometabolism of CVOCs.
In 2022, the first commercial application of MetaArray™ was performed at the site. MetaArray™ utilizes statistical analysis, such as principal component analysis and multivariate analysis to provide evidence that reductive dechlorination is active or even that it is slowing. This creates actionable data allowing users to save money by making important site management decisions earlier.
The results of the MetaArray™ analysis’ support vector machine (SVM) identified groundwater monitoring wells with a 80% confidence that were characterized as either Limited for Reductive Decholorination or had a High Reductive Reduction Dechlorination potential. The results of MetaArray™ will be used to further optimize the site’s post remediation monitoring program for monitored natural attenuation.
Download the Latest OSHA 10 Answers PDF : oyetrade.comNarendra Jayas
Latest OSHA 10 Test Question and Answers PDF for Construction and General Industry Exam.
Download the full set of 390 MCQ type question and answers - https://www.oyetrade.com/OSHA-10-Answers-2021.php
To Help OSHA 10 trainees to pass their pre-test and post-test we have prepared set of 390 question and answers called OSHA 10 Answers in downloadable PDF format. The OSHA 10 Answers question bank is prepared by our in-house highly experienced safety professionals and trainers. The OSHA 10 Answers document consists of 390 MCQ type question and answers updated for year 2024 exams.
Kinetic studies on malachite green dye adsorption from aqueous solutions by A...Open Access Research Paper
Water polluted by dyestuffs compounds is a global threat to health and the environment; accordingly, we prepared a green novel sorbent chemical and Physical system from an algae, chitosan and chitosan nanoparticle and impregnated with algae with chitosan nanocomposite for the sorption of Malachite green dye from water. The algae with chitosan nanocomposite by a simple method and used as a recyclable and effective adsorbent for the removal of malachite green dye from aqueous solutions. Algae, chitosan, chitosan nanoparticle and algae with chitosan nanocomposite were characterized using different physicochemical methods. The functional groups and chemical compounds found in algae, chitosan, chitosan algae, chitosan nanoparticle, and chitosan nanoparticle with algae were identified using FTIR, SEM, and TGADTA/DTG techniques. The optimal adsorption conditions, different dosages, pH and Temperature the amount of algae with chitosan nanocomposite were determined. At optimized conditions and the batch equilibrium studies more than 99% of the dye was removed. The adsorption process data matched well kinetics showed that the reaction order for dye varied with pseudo-first order and pseudo-second order. Furthermore, the maximum adsorption capacity of the algae with chitosan nanocomposite toward malachite green dye reached as high as 15.5mg/g, respectively. Finally, multiple times reusing of algae with chitosan nanocomposite and removing dye from a real wastewater has made it a promising and attractive option for further practical applications.
Evolving Lifecycles with High Resolution Site Characterization (HRSC) and 3-D...Joshua Orris
The incorporation of a 3DCSM and completion of HRSC provided a tool for enhanced, data-driven, decisions to support a change in remediation closure strategies. Currently, an approved pilot study has been obtained to shut-down the remediation systems (ISCO, P&T) and conduct a hydraulic study under non-pumping conditions. A separate micro-biological bench scale treatability study was competed that yielded positive results for an emerging innovative technology. As a result, a field pilot study has commenced with results expected in nine-twelve months. With the results of the hydraulic study, field pilot studies and an updated risk assessment leading site monitoring optimization cost lifecycle savings upwards of $15MM towards an alternatively evolved best available technology remediation closure strategy.
A Comprehensive Guide on Cable Location Services Detections Method, Tools, an...Aussie Hydro-Vac Services
Explore Aussie Hydrovac's comprehensive cable location services, employing advanced tools like ground-penetrating radar and robotic CCTV crawlers for precise detection. Also offering aerial surveying solutions. Contact for reliable service in Australia.
Monitor indicators of genetic diversity from space using Earth Observation dataSpatial Genetics
Genetic diversity within and among populations is essential for species persistence. While targets and indicators for genetic diversity are captured in the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, assessing genetic diversity across many species at national and regional scales remains challenging. Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) need accessible tools for reliable and efficient monitoring at relevant scales. Here, we describe how Earth Observation satellites (EO) make essential contributions to enable, accelerate, and improve genetic diversity monitoring and preservation. Specifically, we introduce a workflow integrating EO into existing genetic diversity monitoring strategies and present a set of examples where EO data is or can be integrated to improve assessment, monitoring, and conservation. We describe how available EO data can be integrated in innovative ways to support calculation of the genetic diversity indicators of the GBF monitoring framework and to inform management and monitoring decisions, especially in areas with limited research infrastructure or access. We also describe novel, integrative approaches to improve the indicators that can be implemented with the coming generation of EO data, and new capabilities that will provide unprecedented detail to characterize the changes to Earth’s surface and their implications for biodiversity, on a global scale.
The modification of an existing product or the formulation of a new product to fill a newly identified market niche or customer need are both examples of product development. This study generally developed and conducted the formulation of aramang baked products enriched with malunggay conducted by the researchers. Specifically, it answered the acceptability level in terms of taste, texture, flavor, odor, and color also the overall acceptability of enriched aramang baked products. The study used the frequency distribution for evaluators to determine the acceptability of enriched aramang baked products enriched with malunggay. As per sensory evaluation conducted by the researchers, it was proven that aramang baked products enriched with malunggay was acceptable in terms of Odor, Taste, Flavor, Color, and Texture. Based on the results of sensory evaluation of enriched aramang baked products proven that three (3) treatments were all highly acceptable in terms of variable Odor, Taste, Flavor, Color and Textures conducted by the researchers.
Formulation of aramang baked products enriched with malunggay
Champaign County Soil & Water Conservation District - Revolutionizing Conservation
1. 1
Steve Stierwalt
President of
Association of Illinois
Soil & Water
Conservation Districts
Bruce Henrikson
S.T.A.R. Program
Coordinator,
Champaign Cty. SWCD
REVOLUTIONIZING
CONSERVATION
2.
3. WHAT IS S.T.A.R.?
Local resource concerns
Based on farmer/rancher practices
Individual fields
Evaluate
Verification
Recognition
Conservation drivers
4. WHY WAS S.T.A.R. CREATED?
Two concerned farmers
Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy (NLRS)
Voluntary solution to local natural resource
concerns
GULF HYPOXIC
ZONE
6. HOW DOES S.T.A.R.
WORK?
1. Field Form completed for
individual fields for a given
crop year.
2. Points assigned for each
practice.
3. Summary of points convert to a
S.T.A.R. Rating of 1 to 5 stars.
FREE!
Frequently
Asked
Questions
8. Science Committee of S.T.A.R.
Dr. Emily Bruner…American Farmland Trust
Erin Bush…………Resource Conservationist, CCSWCD
Lowell Gentry…...Principal Research Specialist in
Agriculture,
NRES, University of Illinois
Doug Gucker…….Extension Educator, University of Illinois
Dan Schaefer…….Director of Nutrient Stewardship, Illinois
Fertilizer and Chemical Association
Eric Miller………..Piatt County farmer and NREC Research
Cooperator
Dr. Emerson Nafziger......Crop Production, ACES, University
of IL
14. Benefits of S.T.A.R.
• Decreases nutrient & soil sediment losses
• Assist producers in securing state cost share
• Positive image of agriculture
• Inspire other farmers and landowners
• Promotes producers for new farmland leases
• Market incentives for sustainably grown crops
• Support of local sanitary groups
15. Urbana-Champaign Sanitary District
Contracts with farmers to haul off sludge
Will pay 0.05% over the base fee for EACH S.T.A.R. Rating
Purpose is to motivate farmers to use management
practices that will help meet the NLRS goals
16. What are YOUR resource concerns?
How can S.T.A.R. help with those?
17. 61 counties in Illinois
Iowa and Missouri (MOU)
2 counties in Indiana
Endorsed by the NACD
North Central Region:
MN, MI, IN, OH, and WI
Expansion S.T.A.R.
20. Illinois S.T.A.R. Supporters/Partners
ADM – pilot program committed to using S.T.A.R. across 350,000 acres
American Farmland Trust (AFT)
Association of Illinois Soil and Water Conservation Districts (AISWCD) – endorsement
Farm Credit Illinois - provided $1,000 for field signs ($5,000 more in 2020)
Illinois Certified Crop Advisors
Illinois Corn Growers
Illinois Department of Agriculture (IDOA) – endorsement, requirement for cost-share
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA)
Illinois Fertilizer and Chemical Association (IFCA)
Illinois Nutrient Loss Reduction (NLRS) Strategy Committee
Illinois Sustainable Ag Partnership (ISAP)
Kellogg – with Bunge, provided $5,000 to six counties for S.T.A.R. promotion
The Nature Conservancy (TNC)
Precision Conservation Management (PCM)
Soil Health Partnership (SHP)
Soil and Water Conservation Districts
Interested crop production retailers
Various watershed project groups
Interested county Farm Bureaus
Syngenta
Bayer
21. What industry has to say about S.T.A.R.:
Positives
Practices are locally adapted
Metrics are practice vs outcome based
Leverages existing infrastructure – SWCD
Management by non-commercial third party
Includes soil conservation and soil health
Initiative could move globally
22. Industry questions about S.T.A.R.:
Can it be a national program?
What are implementation steps to other U.S. states?
Digitization… PWA or API to recordkeeping structure
Can it expand to include water quality?
Need for research to tie practices to productivity.
What would it take to move globally?
24. Affiliate S.T.A.R.
Science
Committee
develops Field
Form
State affiliate
grants local
implementation
licenses
State affiliate
implements
verification
State affiliate
compiles &
reports data
State affiliate
establishes and
maintains
Steering
Committee and
Science
Committee
Determine
local
resource
concerns
Licensees
evaluate
completed
Field Form
Licensees
recognize
growers
Random
Field Form
verification
Farmers
Champaign Co. Soil &
Water Conservation
District
S.T.A.R.
Affiliate
Role
29. 2018 Ratings
5 Star Fields = 89 = 20 %
4 Star Fields = 171 = 39 %
3 Star Fields = 122 = 28 %
2 Star Fields = 35 = 8 %
1 Star Field = 22 = 5 %
7
87%
Editor's Notes
My name is Bruce Henrikson. I serve as the STAR Program Coordinator with the Champaign County Soil & Water Conservation District in Champaign, Illinois. The purpose of this presentation is to explain STAR… a tool designed to help farmers and farmland owners evaluate how their management practices can reduce soil and nutrient losses and improve soil health. STAR was the idea of two farmers, Joe Rothermel and Steve Stierwalt, both serving on the board of directors of the Champaign County Soil Conservation District, and was further developed by the Stewardship Committee of that organization. The program officially began in April of 2017 and is trademarked and owned by the District.
STEVE: What does it mean to “Revolutionize Conservation?”
What is the revolution that I believe is already here? A “revolution” can be defined as a “radical or complete change.” My concern is that the vast majority of my generation still consider the use of conservation practices as a “nice thing to do” but feel little or no pressure to change.
Generations growing up now are very comfortable that conservation is not optional, they are demanding it! At every level of government and industry, the people in charge are trying to respond!
New Legislation is being proposed most every day. The latest major effort is entitled H2Ohio, a program that is spending millions of $ to reduce phosphorus runoff and improve the quality of water in Ohio.
Every major agriculture and food business has developed goals that include sustainability, whether that means purchasing commodities grown sustainably or selling products that are processed with sustainable practices.
We believe that industry involvement is beginning to “revolutionize” how conservation gets done. SWCD’S and others have always “pushed” conservation. As the Ag industry players start to implement “their” conservation plan, they are introducing new market forces. These new forces are starting to “pull” conservation, which has the potential to completely change the game. As farmers choose to adopt conservation practices to qualify for a market opportunity, those practice changes can become long term!
Does your company have a plan? Are there business opportunities available to retailers that are positioned to respond as conservation and sustainable practices become the “new normal” in the not so distant future? How will you respond when your customers are impacted by this conservation wave that continues to build?
I make no claim to have answers to the business decisions, YOU are the experts on that! Bruce and I are here to help prepare you for this revolution that has started. Government and Industry here in Illinois are starting to use the S.T.A.R. Initiative. This year, anyone who wants cost share $ from the Partners for Conservation Program in the Illinois Department Of Ag, will be required to fill out a S.T.A.R. form.
ADM in the Tuscola area is asking all their farmer customers on 350,000 acres to complete field forms and have establish specific goals for those customers to reach certain Star Rating levels. The Kellogg company sources much of their grain through Bunge elevators in the east central Illinois area and have asked their customers to participate. Kellogg has already provided $5,000 mini-grants to a number of Soil and Water offices to promote STAR. Several major seed companies have committed to use STAR in pilot projects this year for future consideration of large scale use.
Our goal today is not to bring you more work! We want to give you a working knowledge of S.T.A.R. so that you can respond confidently to your customers questions.
Starting with question one … what exactly is the ST.A.R. program? Simply put, S.T.A.R is a FREE tool to assist farm operators and landowners to evaluate their nutrient and soil loss management practices on individual fields and to promote “conservation management practices”.
What was the genesis for S.T.A.R.?
Two farmers in central Illinois, Steve Stierwalt and Joe Rothermel, conceived the idea for this program, as an actionable vehicle to do something meaningful towards agricultural conservation and hopefully encourage others to do so, as well.
Illinois as you may know, along with other midwestern states, continues to be a major contributor to nutrient runoff issues that load the watersheds and rivers of the region, and contribute to significant environmental issues downstream. Most notably, these include the Gulf Hypoxic Zone and algae blooms of that corner of the country. There continues to be clear recognition that we need to reduce nutrient losses and soil erosion, no matter the source and the cause. There are many conservation and nutrient management practices that are considered as “best” on cropland in Illinois and the Midwest. The use of those practices have measurably contributed to saving our agriculture resources for the future, but more needs to be done!
The STAR program will help farmers and landowners to meet the goals of the agriculture sector, and similarly, those of the Illinois Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy. This strategy was developed by the administrative agencies of the State of Illinois to guide efforts to improve water quality at home and downstream by reducing nitrogen and phosphorus levels in our lakes, streams, and rivers. The program aims to encourage farm operators and landowners to reduce nitrogen and phosphorus losses by altering the timing of the application of nutrients so it occurs when the plants need them, and by adopting the use of cover crops, and by preventing soil losses by reducing tillage.
STEVE: WHY was S.T.A.R. created?
Steve and Joe are concerned that many of their neighbors do not seem to use many of the practices that help with the conservation of farmland. It is obvious to all of you that if farmers and farmland owners do not improve the practices that are contributing to the environmental problems caused by agriculture, the government WILL add regulations, as they have in Delaware and Ohio. I believe it is much better if we voluntarily make some changes that can improve those issues.
The existence of these issues has already led the EPA and the Illinois Department of Agriculture to develop the Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy to guide efforts to improve water quality at home and downstream by reducing nitrogen and phosphorus levels in our lakes, streams, and rivers.
You are all fully aware that those environmental issues have been connected directly to the Gulf Hypoxic Zone as shown in this image of the delta region.
This is also a picture of the future of agriculture production… and YOUR future. The threat to the environment is real.. And so is the threat to how we farm! STAR can help decision makers to learn what changes in their practices can reduce nutrient losses.
Starting with question one … what exactly is the ST.A.R. program? Simply put, S.T.A.R is a FREE tool to assist farm operators and landowners to evaluate their nutrient and soil loss management practices on individual fields and to promote “conservation management practices”.
What was the genesis for S.T.A.R.?
Two farmers in central Illinois, Steve Stierwalt and Joe Rothermel, conceived the idea for this program, as an actionable vehicle to do something meaningful towards agricultural conservation and hopefully encourage others to do so, as well.
Illinois as you may know, along with other midwestern states, continues to be a major contributor to nutrient runoff issues that load the watersheds and rivers of the region, and contribute to significant environmental issues downstream. Most notably, these include the Gulf Hypoxic Zone and algae blooms of that corner of the country. There continues to be clear recognition that we need to reduce nutrient losses and soil erosion, no matter the source and the cause. There are many conservation and nutrient management practices that are considered as “best” on cropland in Illinois and the Midwest. The use of those practices have measurably contributed to saving our agriculture resources for the future, but more needs to be done!
The STAR program will help farmers and landowners to meet the goals of the agriculture sector, and similarly, those of the Illinois Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy. This strategy was developed by the administrative agencies of the State of Illinois to guide efforts to improve water quality at home and downstream by reducing nitrogen and phosphorus levels in our lakes, streams, and rivers. The program aims to encourage farm operators and landowners to reduce nitrogen and phosphorus losses by altering the timing of the application of nutrients so it occurs when the plants need them, and by adopting the use of cover crops, and by preventing soil losses by reducing tillage.
The image depicted here shows the points system used in the evaluation system.
The conservation management practices and the corresponding amount of points associated with each practice were developed by the program’s “Science Advisory Committee”, which is composed of university researchers and other technical experts. The 2019 Field Form has been enhanced to even more closely align with the goals of the Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy mentioned earlier.
The decisions to identify the best management practices and the points to be assigned for each practice were determined by a special “Science Committee,” identified here. As mentioned earlier, there was a significant effort in making sure that the 2019 Field Form is much better aligned with the goals of the NLRS. We very much appreciate the work done by Lowell Gentry, Doug Gucker, Dan Schaefer, Eric Miller, Dr. Emerson Nafziger, Brett Roberts, Dr. Emily Bruner, Joe Rothermel, and Erin Bush.
This is an sample Field Form for Henry Jones, a fake name with all MADE UP entries for a corn field. This slide shows only the TOP half of the form. He used no cover crops, so there would be 0 points for Section 9. There is a maximum of 12 possible points for Cover Crops. He has his soil sampled every 4 years… that earns 2 points… and has those pulled in the spring, worth 1 extra point compared to fall. Also, he has it done by a retailer who uses GPS for taking the samples that earns another point.
In section 11, Henry had applied some DAP before December 1st that earned 1 point, but indicated he used NO other nitrogen in that time period and is given 4 points for that good practice.
In section 14 he shows his crop rotation history which has been a traditional corn-soybean rotation. He received 2 points for that approach as it is a good agronomic practice and considered better than a continuous crop. It is particularly better for soil health to NOT have a monoculture… so a continuous cash crop of 3 years or more is given 0 points.
Section 15 allows the participant to identify the tillage used in both fall and spring. Henry Jones is like too many farmers in that he did some light tillage on his bean stubble in the fall. Because it was a very shallow disturbance of less than 3 inches, he was given 1 point. Any kind of tillage on bean stubble in the fall increases the chances of soil and, therefore, nutrient losses on that field, so there was a 3 point penalty for that poor practice! The good news is that he used NO tillage in the spring… and earned 5 points for that good practice.
Mr. Jones applied all of his nitrogen, other than the DAP, in the spring. So in Section 12, he checked that at least 75% of the nitrogen was applied in this time period earning 2 points, and also checked that at least 25% of that nitrogen was side-dressed and earned 2 more points.
Assume he applied 190 pounds per acre of actual nitrogen counting all sources. As a result, Section 13 includes 2 points for keeping his total nitrogen applied at a rate of 181 to 200 pounds per acre. Keeping that rate below 181 pounds would have earned even more points. He could have also earned more points by using Triple Super instead of the DAP…. or applying any of the fertilizer using VRT. It is also very good that he did NOT apply the DAP or any fertilizer on frozen or snow covered ground. That would have scored significantly more negative points!
Section 16 has a number of conservation and management practices that can be very positive, even if they do not all directly reduce nutrient and/or soil losses. The Science Committee recognizes those items, many of which are edge of field practices, indicate an effort to better manage for conservation practices. Henry Jones got 2 points because that specific field had a grass waterway. He cares enough about conservation and potential nutrient losses to attend a nutrient management meeting or a field day within the last year. He also worked with his retailer, who is a Certified Crop Advisor, to develop a WRITTEN plan for the 2019 Crop Year. He was given 1 points for each of those. The maximum points possible for this section is 8.
The total points for Mr. Jones are 27 positive points and 3 negative points for a net of 24 points!
This is the scale for assigning STAR ratings that was determined by the Science Committee for the 2019 crop year. Henry Jones’ field with 24 points was therefore given a 3 Star Rating.
It important to know that a few changes, or even one small change, in the practices used for any field can make a difference in the Star Rating. For example: In Version 2 of Henry Jones’ Field Form, let’s assume he used Cereal Rye as a cover crop… which earned 7 points. He terminated it, but did so before he planted that field in the spring. Lets also assume that he applied some phosphorus with the planter, so it was banded subsurface, which earned 4 more points in Section 13. The total went from 24 to 35 points…. which means the field now has a 4 Star rating.
In Version 3, the only change from the previous assumptions was in the Fall tillage practices. If he used no tillage, he would get 5 points for that practice. But he would not get the 1 point for shallow tillage, but also he did not lose the 3 points for working the bean stubble. So his total went from 35 points in version 2… to 42 points in this version.. which means this field is now rated at 5 Stars.
There are a number of ways for a farmer or landowner to access the application process to participate in STAR. The email address here and on your flyer is www.starfreetool.com That website actually has all of the methods listed and explained.
Shown here are some of the potential benefits of using the program…
… Read Slide …
Please note at the bottom the last two dot points. These touch on one of our key concepts – engaging CONSERVATION DRIVERS.
The STAR program has had numerous conversations with a number of companies representing the market and supply side of agriculture. In 2018, ADM launched a pilot program using the system with several its contractual growers.
You can read more on this, by visiting the program website at starfreetool.com.
There are a number of ways for a farmer or landowner to access the application process to participate in STAR. The email address here and on your flyer is www.starfreetool.com That website actually has all of the methods listed and explained.
There are a number of ways for a farmer or landowner to access the application process to participate in STAR. The email address here and on your flyer is www.starfreetool.com That website actually has all of the methods listed and explained.
STEVE: What does it mean to “Revolutionize Conservation?”
What is the revolution that I believe is already here? A “revolution” can be defined as a “radical or complete change.” My concern is that the vast majority of my generation still consider the use of conservation practices as a “nice thing to do” but feel little or no pressure to change.
Generations growing up now are very comfortable that conservation is not optional, they are demanding it! At every level of government and industry, the people in charge are trying to respond!
New Legislation is being proposed most every day. The latest major effort is entitled H2Ohio, a program that is spending millions of $ to reduce phosphorus runoff and improve the quality of water in Ohio.
Every major agriculture and food business has developed goals that include sustainability, whether that means purchasing commodities grown sustainably or selling products that are processed with sustainable practices.
We believe that industry involvement is beginning to “revolutionize” how conservation gets done. SWCD’S and others have always “pushed” conservation. As the Ag industry players start to implement “their” conservation plan, they are introducing new market forces. These new forces are starting to “pull” conservation, which has the potential to completely change the game. As farmers choose to adopt conservation practices to qualify for a market opportunity, those practice changes can become long term!
Does your company have a plan? Are there business opportunities available to retailers that are positioned to respond as conservation and sustainable practices become the “new normal” in the not so distant future? How will you respond when your customers are impacted by this conservation wave that continues to build?
I make no claim to have answers to the business decisions, YOU are the experts on that! Bruce and I are here to help prepare you for this revolution that has started. Government and Industry here in Illinois are starting to use the S.T.A.R. Initiative. This year, anyone who wants cost share $ from the Partners for Conservation Program in the Illinois Department Of Ag, will be required to fill out a S.T.A.R. form.
ADM in the Tuscola area is asking all their farmer customers on 350,000 acres to complete field forms and have establish specific goals for those customers to reach certain Star Rating levels. The Kellogg company sources much of their grain through Bunge elevators in the east central Illinois area and have asked their customers to participate. Kellogg has already provided $5,000 mini-grants to a number of Soil and Water offices to promote STAR. Several major seed companies have committed to use STAR in pilot projects this year for future consideration of large scale use.
Our goal today is not to bring you more work! We want to give you a working knowledge of S.T.A.R. so that you can respond confidently to your customers questions.
As S.T.A.R. has evolved… and as we have sought to find more reasons to motivate farmers to participate, we have encouraged various supply chain businesses to use this tool to help them meet their firm’s goals of providing sustainable products.
Archer Daniels Midland in Decatur purchases their grain through elevators in Douglas, Moultrie, Macon and other counties. They are promoting STAR by asking all farmers who market grain to them to complete a form for each of their fields. They have established goals for their farmer participants to have 25% of the fields earn a 3 Star Rating by 2023 and increase the 3-Star Rated fields to 50% by 2028 and have at least 25% of the fields to be rated at 5 Stars by that year.
In July of 2019, Kellogg’s offered $5,000 mini-grants to the Soil & Water Districts that had a License Agreement and were in the east central Illinois counties from which Bunge draws in grain.
I won’t read the name of every supporter on this list, but will instead highlight some of the major ones. ADM has asked all of their contracted farmers with about 350,000 acres, to submit field forms. Kellogg has asked their Bunge elevators to have their farmer customers do the same and provided six $5,000 mini-grants to county Soil & Water offices to help promote the program. PCM is supported by the IL Corn Growers Association and has an access point to our field form through their portal.
The Syngenta soybean plant at Pekin will be asking their farmer growers to participate and Bayer is planning to do the same at some of their locations.
As S.T.A.R. has evolved… and as we have sought to find more reasons to motivate farmers to participate, we have encouraged various supply chain businesses to use this tool to help them meet their firm’s goals of providing sustainable products.
Archer Daniels Midland in Decatur purchases their grain through elevators in Douglas, Moultrie, Macon and other counties. They are promoting STAR by asking all farmers who market grain to them to complete a form for each of their fields. They have established goals for their farmer participants to have 25% of the fields earn a 3 Star Rating by 2023 and increase the 3-Star Rated fields to 50% by 2028 and have at least 25% of the fields to be rated at 5 Stars by that year.
In July of 2019, Kellogg’s offered $5,000 mini-grants to the Soil & Water Districts that had a License Agreement and were in the east central Illinois counties from which Bunge draws in grain.
Describe local implementation process
- Implementers are franchisees of the state affiliate
STAR has completed two crop years. The 2018 Crop Year submissions included field forms completed between July 1st, 2018 and about March 31st, 2019. We had 181 participants from 40 different counties complete at least one form. The 436 fields evaluated totaled over 27,000 acres. The results shown here were above our goals, and they also indicate the system seems to work well in balancing the ratings with the practices used. To be clear, an “average” farmer in Illinois may very well have fields that are rated with 1 Star. Every time a farmer adds some good practices, there is the potential to add to the Star rating. We realize the higher ratings seemed to be more common, but we know that farmers who use the better practices are also the ones who most likely will complete forms.
About 90% of the fields submitted for the 2018 year were done after January 1, 2019. It was the first Crop Year for ALL but one of the Licensed counties, and the majority of those signed up after January 1.
STAR has completed two crop years. The 2018 Crop Year submissions included field forms completed between July 1st, 2018 and about March 31st, 2019. We had 181 participants from 40 different counties complete at least one form. The 436 fields evaluated totaled over 27,000 acres. The results shown here were above our goals, and they also indicate the system seems to work well in balancing the ratings with the practices used. To be clear, an “average” farmer in Illinois may very well have fields that are rated with 1 Star. Every time a farmer adds some good practices, there is the potential to add to the Star rating. We realize the higher ratings seemed to be more common, but we know that farmers who use the better practices are also the ones who most likely will complete forms.
About 90% of the fields submitted for the 2018 year were done after January 1, 2019. It was the first Crop Year for ALL but one of the Licensed counties, and the majority of those signed up after January 1.