This chapter discusses collaborative team decision-making and pupil information processes in schools. It identifies characteristics of effective school teams, such as shared goals, clearly defined roles, and using objective data. Several types of school teams are described, including those focused on school-wide assistance and individual education plans. When communicating with parents, teams should do so frequently, focus on solutions, and translate information. Strict guidelines outlined in FERPA must be followed when handling and disseminating pupil information and records.
A Brief History on the Approaches to
Language Testing
In the 1950s, an era of behaviorism and special
attention to constrastive analysis, testing focused on
specific language elements such as the phonological,
grammatical, and lexical contrasts between two
languages.
Between the 1970s and 1980s, communicative theories
of language brought with them a more integrative view of
testing in which specialists claimed that the whole of
communicative event was considerably greater than the
sum of its linguistic element (Clark, 1983; Brown, 2004: 8)
Definition of Language Testing
According to Oller (1979, 1-2), a language testing is a
device that tries to assess how much has been learned
in a foreign language course, or some part of a course
by learners.
According to Brown (2004: 3), a language testing is a
method of measuring a person’s ability, knowledge, or
performance in a given domain.
Language Testing Techniques:
Direct Testing vs. Indirect Testing
Discrete Testing vs. Integrative Testing
Norm-Referenced Testing vs. Criterion-Referenced Testing
Objective Testing vs. Subjective Testing
It is an important part in English Language Teaching. It helps the teachers to make an effective test as well as to take the testing system to new height.
Types of tests: proficiency, achievement, diagnostic, placement
Types of testing: direct vs indirect tests, discrete point vs integrative tests, criterion-referenced vs norm-referenced tests, objective vs subjective tests
A Brief History on the Approaches to
Language Testing
In the 1950s, an era of behaviorism and special
attention to constrastive analysis, testing focused on
specific language elements such as the phonological,
grammatical, and lexical contrasts between two
languages.
Between the 1970s and 1980s, communicative theories
of language brought with them a more integrative view of
testing in which specialists claimed that the whole of
communicative event was considerably greater than the
sum of its linguistic element (Clark, 1983; Brown, 2004: 8)
Definition of Language Testing
According to Oller (1979, 1-2), a language testing is a
device that tries to assess how much has been learned
in a foreign language course, or some part of a course
by learners.
According to Brown (2004: 3), a language testing is a
method of measuring a person’s ability, knowledge, or
performance in a given domain.
Language Testing Techniques:
Direct Testing vs. Indirect Testing
Discrete Testing vs. Integrative Testing
Norm-Referenced Testing vs. Criterion-Referenced Testing
Objective Testing vs. Subjective Testing
It is an important part in English Language Teaching. It helps the teachers to make an effective test as well as to take the testing system to new height.
Types of tests: proficiency, achievement, diagnostic, placement
Types of testing: direct vs indirect tests, discrete point vs integrative tests, criterion-referenced vs norm-referenced tests, objective vs subjective tests
There are many examples of evidence-informed decision making (EIDM) among public health professionals and organizations in Canada. However, there are limited mechanisms in place to facilitate the sharing of these stories within the public health community. The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (NCCMT) seeks to address this gap with an interactive, peer-led webinar series featuring a collection of EIDM success stories in public health.
These success stories will illustrate what EIDM in public health practice, programs and policy looks like across the country.
Join us to engage with public health practitioners across Canada as they share their success stories of using or implementing EIDM in the real world. Learn about the strategies and tools used by presenters to improve the use of evidence.
Featuring:
Knowledge broker training for evidence-informed decision making: Building capacity in public health
Lori Greco and Dr. Megan Ward, Region of Peel Public Health
Region of Peel Public Health has identified evidence-informed decision making as a strategic priority, termed End-to-End Public Health Practice. Learn more about how this health unit is building internal capacity for knowledge brokering and evidence-informed decision making.
Making evidence-informed decisions about the Alberta Public Health well-child visit: The art and the science
Farah Bandali and Maureen Devolin, Alberta Health Services
In Alberta, there was decreasing time available for non-immunization well-child clinic visit activities and these activities varied at clinics across the province. Learn more about how these authors used evidence-informed decision making to decide on which routine activities to include in non-immunization well-child clinic activities.
This presentation outlines best practices regarding IDEA, Child Find, Evaluations, Eligibility, Individualized Education Programs, and procedural safeguards when working in the area of special education.
Administrators aren’t the only education professionals who can take on leadership roles. Every teacher can be a leader—and this edWebinar will show special educators how to choose and navigate their own individual path to educational leadership.
In this edWebinar, Belva C. Collins, Ed.D., Professor Emeritus at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, introduces eight different paths you can follow to become a leader in your school and community:
Making data-based decisions and conducting classroom research
Effecting schoolwide change
Mentoring other teachers and paraprofessionals
Conducting professional development and consultations
Working effectively with families
Supporting students during transitions
Advocating for students
Connecting with professional organizations that address disability-related concerns
Dr. Collins guides you through reflective experiences and challenge you to develop your own personal leadership plan that you can accomplish without leaving the classroom. Learn from examples of effective special education teacher-leaders and get practical guidelines for following various leadership paths. This recorded session is essential viewing for all special education professionals, from pre-K through high school.
About the Presenter
Dr. Belva C. Collins is Professor Emeritus at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte and the University of Kentucky, having served as Chair of the Special Education departments at both institutions. Beginning as a rural special education teacher, she has focused on serving students with low incidence disabilities for over 40 years. Her research on systematic instruction and personnel preparation has resulted in numerous texts, research publications, and professional presentations. Dr. Collins served as Chair of the American Council on Rural Special Education (ACRES) and Editor of Rural Special Education Quarterly, resulting in receipt of the Eagle Award for lifetime service. She also served on the Executive Board of the Higher Education Consortium for Special Education (HECSE) and recently received the North Carolina Special Education Teacher Educator of the Year Award. She currently works on a national project to facilitate inclusion of students with significant disabilities.
Join the Teaching All Students: Practical Strategies for Inclusive Classrooms community to network with educators, participate in online discussions, receive invitations to upcoming edWebinars, and view past edWebinars to earn CE certificates.
2. Characteristics of Effective School
Teams
• Effective communication and collaboration is essential, given
that many important decisions are made by groups of
individuals
• Some important principles:
– Have a shared goal/purpose
– Clearly articulate roles and functions of team members
– Listen to and respect other’s viewpoints
– Balance structure and flexibility during team meetings
– Use objective data
– Ensure confidentiality
– Regularly evaluate team functioning
3. Types of Teams
• School-wide Assistance
• Intervention Assistance
• Multi-disciplinary
• Individual Education Plan
4. Communicating with Parents
• Communicate frequently
• Communicate strengths and weaknesses
• Translate assessment information
• Be aware of cultural differences and their impact
• Schedule to facilitate attendance
• Clearly explain assessment purposes and outcomes
• Use non-technical language
• Focus on solutions/avoid blame
5. Communicating Using Electronic
and Written Records
• Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act
(FERPA)
– Parents have right to inspect records until child is
18
– Release of information to others requires parent
consent
6. Collection of Pupil Information
• Screening (parent consent not necessarily
needed)
– Academic
– Vision
– Hearing
• For eligibility determination and collection of
data for research purposes, parent consent is
needed.
7. Collection of Pupil Information
• Verification – ascertain the truth of collected information
– Only verified data should be maintained in records
• Summarization and Interpretation
– Typically, a report is created when determining eligibility for special
services
– Principles for good reports
• Organized
• Use language that is easily understood
• Focus on observed behaviors
• Focus on relevant information
• Convey level of certainty
• Provide data-based recommendations
8. Maintenance of Pupil Information
• Retention of pupil information for limited
periods of time
• Parental rights of inspection and amendment
• Assurance of protection against inappropriate
snooping.
9. Dissemination of Pupil Information
• Access within schools
– Must keep record of who views student files
– Only those with legitimate need to know can view
files
• Access outside schools
– Parent permission needed
• Important considerations for electronic
records and communication
10. Dissemination of Pupil Information
• Access within schools
– Must keep record of who views student files
– Only those with legitimate need to know can view
files
• Access outside schools
– Parent permission needed
• Important considerations for electronic
records and communication