The document discusses key takeaways from a virtual forum on the environment and climate change hosted by the Climate Change Expert Group. It notes that common tabular formats can help track progress towards nationally determined contributions in a transparent way while balancing usability and machine readability. It also stresses the importance of ensuring economic stimulus packages in response to COVID-19 facilitate a clean energy transition and do not cause emissions or policies to backslide. Several countries are already integrating climate ambitions into their recovery plans.
The document discusses key takeaways from a climate change expert group meeting on reporting and review provisions under Articles 6 and 13 of the Paris Agreement, countries' net-zero emissions targets, the role of international carbon markets, and preparations for the Global Stocktake. Some of the main points discussed include needing further clarity in some Article 6 reporting provisions, opportunities to clarify details of reporting and review at COP26 and beyond, the importance of implementation plans and review processes for net-zero targets, and ensuring the Global Stocktake achieves its intended outcome of informing updated climate commitments and action.
CCXG Forum, September 2021, Juan Carlos MonterreyOECD Environment
The document discusses recommendations for the structure and focus of the Global Stocktake under the Paris Agreement. It argues that the Global Stocktake should:
1. Help parties enhance their climate ambition in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement by focusing on the best understanding of how to implement global net zero emissions by 2050.
2. Conduct an aggregate review of country targets, pathways, and policies to identify gaps and inform practical guidance on strengthening action.
3. Directly refer to implementation challenges across mitigation, adaptation, and means of implementation to help parties achieve the Paris Agreement goals through transformational system changes.
International carbon markets can help countries raise climate ambitions by facilitating access to low-cost emissions reductions opportunities in other countries. Under the Paris Agreement, all countries are expected to contribute to reducing emissions and decarbonizing their economies this century. For countries acquiring offsets, carbon markets allow adding emissions reductions on top of their fastest possible domestic decarbonization pathways. However, offsets must not replace or reduce domestic climate action. While carbon markets can accelerate short-term emissions reductions in some contexts, most carbon dioxide removal technologies remain in early stages. Strict safeguards are needed to ensure offsets do not undermine the goals of the Paris Agreement.
The document discusses preparations for the upcoming Global Stocktake under the Paris Agreement. So far, discussions among parties have focused mainly on logistics, but more thought needs to go into how to achieve the stated goal of informing parties on enhancing their climate actions and cooperation. Specifically, opportunities and examples of good practices should be highlighted to provide clear positive messages from parties' experiences. Additional considerations include managing the large volume of inputs, repeating themes in technical dialogues, and ensuring information moves beyond interactive sessions to inform parties.
The document discusses key questions and open issues regarding preparations for the first global stocktake (GST) under the Paris Agreement. It outlines four key questions: 1) What is the purpose and utility of the GST? 2) How will GST outputs be translated into the outcome specified in the Paris Agreement? 3) How can ownership of GST recommendations be ensured? 4) How will equity be addressed? It notes that the answers to these questions will impact the design of the GST process and guiding questions. The document also lists open questions and issues regarding the focus of the GST, inputs to be addressed, timelines, and technical support for parties' meaningful participation.
CCXG Forum, September 2021, Chiara Falduto & Jane EllisOECD Environment
Chiara Falduto and Jane Ellis from the OECD presented on opportunities to fine tune draft guidance on reporting under Articles 6.2 and 13 of the Paris Agreement. The presentation outlined key issues such as clarifying the timing and sequencing of Article 6.2 reports, enhancing linkages between similar information reported, and strengthening guidance on accounting and reporting of ITMOs. Minor changes could address some issues like defining the timing of initial reports and annual information submissions. Other issues around banking ITMOs and liability for reversals may require more work. In conclusion, further clarity on selected reporting and review issues relating to Articles 6 could help facilitate implementation and enhance climate ambition.
1) The document discusses countries' net-zero emissions targets and how to understand them. It analyzes countries' targets based on their sectoral coverage, governance mechanisms, stakeholder engagement, terminology, and timeframe.
2) While more countries setting net-zero targets is positive, the details and pathways to achieving the targets vary greatly between countries and need more clarity.
3) Translating long-term net-zero targets into near-term climate policies and plans, through mechanisms like NDCs, sector strategies, and low-emissions development plans, is important for implementation and assessing implications for the Paris Agreement's temperature goal.
The document discusses key takeaways from a virtual forum on the environment and climate change hosted by the Climate Change Expert Group. It notes that common tabular formats can help track progress towards nationally determined contributions in a transparent way while balancing usability and machine readability. It also stresses the importance of ensuring economic stimulus packages in response to COVID-19 facilitate a clean energy transition and do not cause emissions or policies to backslide. Several countries are already integrating climate ambitions into their recovery plans.
The document discusses key takeaways from a climate change expert group meeting on reporting and review provisions under Articles 6 and 13 of the Paris Agreement, countries' net-zero emissions targets, the role of international carbon markets, and preparations for the Global Stocktake. Some of the main points discussed include needing further clarity in some Article 6 reporting provisions, opportunities to clarify details of reporting and review at COP26 and beyond, the importance of implementation plans and review processes for net-zero targets, and ensuring the Global Stocktake achieves its intended outcome of informing updated climate commitments and action.
CCXG Forum, September 2021, Juan Carlos MonterreyOECD Environment
The document discusses recommendations for the structure and focus of the Global Stocktake under the Paris Agreement. It argues that the Global Stocktake should:
1. Help parties enhance their climate ambition in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement by focusing on the best understanding of how to implement global net zero emissions by 2050.
2. Conduct an aggregate review of country targets, pathways, and policies to identify gaps and inform practical guidance on strengthening action.
3. Directly refer to implementation challenges across mitigation, adaptation, and means of implementation to help parties achieve the Paris Agreement goals through transformational system changes.
International carbon markets can help countries raise climate ambitions by facilitating access to low-cost emissions reductions opportunities in other countries. Under the Paris Agreement, all countries are expected to contribute to reducing emissions and decarbonizing their economies this century. For countries acquiring offsets, carbon markets allow adding emissions reductions on top of their fastest possible domestic decarbonization pathways. However, offsets must not replace or reduce domestic climate action. While carbon markets can accelerate short-term emissions reductions in some contexts, most carbon dioxide removal technologies remain in early stages. Strict safeguards are needed to ensure offsets do not undermine the goals of the Paris Agreement.
The document discusses preparations for the upcoming Global Stocktake under the Paris Agreement. So far, discussions among parties have focused mainly on logistics, but more thought needs to go into how to achieve the stated goal of informing parties on enhancing their climate actions and cooperation. Specifically, opportunities and examples of good practices should be highlighted to provide clear positive messages from parties' experiences. Additional considerations include managing the large volume of inputs, repeating themes in technical dialogues, and ensuring information moves beyond interactive sessions to inform parties.
The document discusses key questions and open issues regarding preparations for the first global stocktake (GST) under the Paris Agreement. It outlines four key questions: 1) What is the purpose and utility of the GST? 2) How will GST outputs be translated into the outcome specified in the Paris Agreement? 3) How can ownership of GST recommendations be ensured? 4) How will equity be addressed? It notes that the answers to these questions will impact the design of the GST process and guiding questions. The document also lists open questions and issues regarding the focus of the GST, inputs to be addressed, timelines, and technical support for parties' meaningful participation.
CCXG Forum, September 2021, Chiara Falduto & Jane EllisOECD Environment
Chiara Falduto and Jane Ellis from the OECD presented on opportunities to fine tune draft guidance on reporting under Articles 6.2 and 13 of the Paris Agreement. The presentation outlined key issues such as clarifying the timing and sequencing of Article 6.2 reports, enhancing linkages between similar information reported, and strengthening guidance on accounting and reporting of ITMOs. Minor changes could address some issues like defining the timing of initial reports and annual information submissions. Other issues around banking ITMOs and liability for reversals may require more work. In conclusion, further clarity on selected reporting and review issues relating to Articles 6 could help facilitate implementation and enhance climate ambition.
1) The document discusses countries' net-zero emissions targets and how to understand them. It analyzes countries' targets based on their sectoral coverage, governance mechanisms, stakeholder engagement, terminology, and timeframe.
2) While more countries setting net-zero targets is positive, the details and pathways to achieving the targets vary greatly between countries and need more clarity.
3) Translating long-term net-zero targets into near-term climate policies and plans, through mechanisms like NDCs, sector strategies, and low-emissions development plans, is important for implementation and assessing implications for the Paris Agreement's temperature goal.
This document summarizes key issues regarding the review processes under Articles 6 and 13 of the Paris Agreement. It outlines UNFCCC experiences with reporting and review, issues with the content and timing of Article 6 and 13 reviews, and other scope issues not yet addressed. Key findings include that Article 6 and 13 review provisions are broadly consistent but some clarification is still needed regarding overlapping reporting and responsibilities. Guidance is also needed on substantive aspects of Article 6 reviews and cross-checking adjustments between countries. The timing of Article 6 reviews should also be further clarified.
The document summarizes preparations for the Youth4Climate event in Milan from September 28-October 2, 2021 ahead of COP26. Over 8,700 youth ages 15-29 from 186 countries applied and nearly 400 were selected, including 40% from marginalized groups. Participants will discuss climate solutions along themes of sustainable recovery, resilience, participation, and climate change impacts. Selected youth provided input through questionnaires to develop "zero-draft" proposals on topics. The proposals will be discussed and finalized in Milan to ensure youth ownership of the process and outcomes. The event aims to amplify youth voices and drive greater climate ambition and action.
CCXG Global Forum September 2017, BGD Accounting within the NDC cycle by Jae ...OECD Environment
This document discusses accounting issues related to countries' Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) under the Paris Agreement. It notes that most current NDCs reference a "business as usual" scenario but does not define how this baseline is established. It also examines how countries may account for and report on their targets over time, considering things like base years, baseline emissions, reduction rates, and emission levels. It raises questions about how different target types like absolute, intensity and business as usual targets will be quantified and accounted for. It discusses the negotiations underway to develop guidance on accounting and suggests more clarity is needed on accounting for national targets and sectoral policies and measures.
This document discusses integrating the content and timing of reporting and review provisions under Articles 6 and 13 of the Paris Agreement. It notes that while reporting and review are closely linked, the sequencing is important - reporting guidelines should be decided before review guidelines. Integrating the two poses challenges around capacity, accounting methodologies, and countries' differing experiences. The document proposes forming an expert committee to further address these issues and provide comments on draft texts, with the goal of developing solutions that acknowledge countries' differing capacities while maintaining fairness.
1) The document outlines key questions to consider for the Global Stocktake under the Paris Agreement, including questions about collective progress on mitigation, adaptation, finance, technology development and transfer, and capacity building.
2) It discusses assessing whether the goals of the Paris Agreement are being achieved, and identifying opportunities and challenges, lessons learned, and recommendations to strengthen climate action.
3) The document raises questions about how to ensure an integrated consideration of inputs across topics during the technical assessment and how to inform parties of outputs to enhance climate commitments and cooperation.
The document discusses reporting provisions under Articles 13 and 6.2 of the Paris Agreement. It finds that the draft Article 6.2 reporting text generally works well, with sufficient alignment to information required in the biennial transparency report and structured summary. It suggests a few potential tweaks that could be made in Glasgow, such as adding lines to the initial report section about environmental integrity, sustainable development, and human rights. However, most further work on reporting guidance is recommended for the post-Glasgow work program.
Guidance for accounting: emissions intensity goals and goals relative to BAU ...OECD Environment
This document discusses accounting considerations and guidance needs for different types of mitigation contributions under the Paris Agreement, including emissions intensity goals and goals relative to baseline emissions levels. Key issues addressed include requirements to quantify future emissions in the target year, developing reference levels for corresponding adjustments under cooperative mechanisms, data sources and guidance for intensity targets, defining consistency and review procedures for baseline scenarios, and inclusion of policies and cutoff years. Recommendations are made around enhancing transparency of assumptions in baseline scenarios and including all adopted policies with significant emissions impacts.
CCXG Global Forum September 2017, BGA Accounting for diverse NDCs: Unpacking ...OECD Environment
This document outlines challenges and suggestions for developing accounting guidance for mitigation targets in nationally determined contributions (NDCs). It discusses the meaning of "accounting" for NDCs, challenges such as different target types across parties and land-related issues, and suggestions like drawing from existing approaches under the UNFWP Convention and Kyoto Protocol, allowing parties flexibility in methodologies, and identifying remaining issues to resolve.
GEF's Support and Experience on Capacity Building for Transparency GEF''s, Du...OECD Environment
Capacity building is integral to the Global Environment Facility's (GEF) support for mitigation projects. The GEF has provided $118.9 million for mitigation capacity building in 2015. Capacity building is also a core part of GEF support across all of its focal areas and is highly integrated into project design. The GEF's support for capacity building helps to strengthen institutions, improve strategies and policies, and enable action at the national level over the long term. This includes support for national communications, biennial update reports, nationally determined contributions, and the new Capacity-building Initiative for Transparency.
Breakout Group A and D summary slides CCXG Global Forum September 2017OECD Environment
The document summarizes discussions from breakout sessions at a Climate Change Expert Group meeting on accounting for nationally determined contributions (NDCs). Key points discussed include:
1) The purpose of mitigation accounting is to transparently explain and track progress towards greenhouse gas emission targets. Greenhouse gas inventories are the fundamental tool to do so consistently over time.
2) Issues to resolve include whether targets should be single- or multi-year, how to account for land use emissions, and how to handle NDCs with multiple targets.
3) Accounting guidance is needed before, during, and after NDC implementation to inform communication, track progress, and account for changes over time in things like business as usual projections
The document summarizes discussions from a climate change expert group meeting on implementing provisions of the Paris Agreement. Key points discussed include:
1) Transitioning Clean Development Mechanism activities to Article 6.4 will require coordination between various actors like host countries, project participants, and the Article 6.4 supervisory body.
2) Host countries will play a greater role under Article 6.4 compared to the Clean Development Mechanism, and capacity building may be needed to assess impacts on countries' climate commitments.
3) Improving electronic reporting systems could help reduce the reporting burden for countries and improve consistency and quality of climate reporting.
CCXG Global Forum September 2017, BGD Accounting within the NDC cycle by Chri...OECD Environment
The document discusses when accounting guidance could be useful in the NDC (Nationally Determined Contribution) cycle. It suggests accounting guidance may help when countries communicate their NDC, when they track progress during implementation in biennial reports, and after the target period to measure actual achievement against the target. It also presents a diagram showing how accounting guidance could be applied at different stages of the first NDC cycle, including communication of NDCs, implementation, reporting, and accounting for the first NDC. The document raises questions about when in the cycle accounting guidance should be applied and what implications delayed inventory reporting timeframes have for accounting.
The document summarizes key discussions from a virtual climate change forum. It addresses transparency issues around common reporting formats to track climate progress and links between Article 6 negotiations and reporting. It also discusses country experiences with updating NDCs, emphasizing ownership and coordination. Finally, it notes the importance of long-term climate strategies to drive short-term targets, and challenges posed by COVID-19 to climate processes.
The document discusses the role of international carbon markets in helping countries achieve their net-zero emissions targets. It finds that most countries do not specify how they intend to use carbon markets. Those that do are adopting different approaches. The suitability of different types of carbon credit activities is also examined, finding some like emission removal technologies are well-suited while others like avoided deforestation have limitations. Risks of overreliance on carbon markets are also discussed, as are perspectives of seller and buyer countries.
CCXG Global Forum September 2017, BGA Accounting for diverse NDCs: Unpacking ...OECD Environment
This document discusses accounting principles and guidance for tracking progress towards Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) under the Paris Agreement. It outlines key principles such as promoting transparency, accuracy and avoiding double counting. It also examines how accounting guidance could clarify and implement these principles for different types of NDCs. Examples given include guidance to avoid double counting of emissions reductions from harvested wood products and clarifying how countries can account for natural disturbances. The document also discusses drawing from existing approaches under the UNFCCC and Kyoto Protocol, and introducing an "accounting balance" to clearly track progress towards NDCs.
Breakout Group 1 and 5 summary slides CCXG Global Forum September 2017OECD Environment
This document summarizes key discussions from breakout groups at a Climate Change Expert Group meeting. The groups discussed how the 2018 Facilitative Dialogue can enhance climate action and provide predictability for investments by showcasing good practices and highlighting mitigation opportunities. They also noted that the modalities and format of the Facilitative Dialogue are important as they can influence outcomes by allowing for simple, focused, and dynamic discussions. A second group discussed upcoming discussions on new and updated NDCs and how the structure and timing of the Facilitative Dialogue process could affect the content agreed upon at COP24.
"Business as usual" baselines: Challenges for tracking NDCs by Andrew PragOECD Environment
The document discusses the challenges of tracking progress towards climate change targets that are expressed as reductions from "business as usual" baselines. Nearly half of countries' intended nationally determined contributions rely on business as usual baselines, but there is no agreed definition or process for setting these baselines. Baseline projections can vary significantly depending on modeling techniques, assumptions, and circumstances. More transparency is needed around countries' baseline scenarios in order to properly assess expected global emissions levels and track overall progress towards climate goals.
The document discusses financing a just transition away from coal. It describes the Powering Past Coal Alliance (PPCA), a global coalition committed to phasing out coal-fired power by 2030 in OECD/EU countries and 2040 in non-OECD countries. The PPCA has 50 national governments, 49 subnational governments, and 70 private sector organizations as members. The document outlines the PPCA's priorities to 2025, which include diplomatic leadership, narrative building, expertise sharing, and encouraging new members and commitments to action. It then provides information on joining a panel discussion on financing a just transition from coal.
The document discusses financing a just transition away from coal. It summarizes the goals and membership of the Powering Past Coal Alliance (PPCA), which aims to phase out coal-fired power by 2030 in OECD/EU countries and by 2040 in non-OECD countries. It outlines the PPCA's priorities to 2025, which include diplomatic leadership, narrative building, expertise sharing, and gaining new membership commitments. The rest of the document discusses challenges and solutions for financing a just transition, including the need for public and private sector action, policy leadership, and product/financing innovations to support affected workers and communities.
This document summarizes key issues regarding the review processes under Articles 6 and 13 of the Paris Agreement. It outlines UNFCCC experiences with reporting and review, issues with the content and timing of Article 6 and 13 reviews, and other scope issues not yet addressed. Key findings include that Article 6 and 13 review provisions are broadly consistent but some clarification is still needed regarding overlapping reporting and responsibilities. Guidance is also needed on substantive aspects of Article 6 reviews and cross-checking adjustments between countries. The timing of Article 6 reviews should also be further clarified.
The document summarizes preparations for the Youth4Climate event in Milan from September 28-October 2, 2021 ahead of COP26. Over 8,700 youth ages 15-29 from 186 countries applied and nearly 400 were selected, including 40% from marginalized groups. Participants will discuss climate solutions along themes of sustainable recovery, resilience, participation, and climate change impacts. Selected youth provided input through questionnaires to develop "zero-draft" proposals on topics. The proposals will be discussed and finalized in Milan to ensure youth ownership of the process and outcomes. The event aims to amplify youth voices and drive greater climate ambition and action.
CCXG Global Forum September 2017, BGD Accounting within the NDC cycle by Jae ...OECD Environment
This document discusses accounting issues related to countries' Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) under the Paris Agreement. It notes that most current NDCs reference a "business as usual" scenario but does not define how this baseline is established. It also examines how countries may account for and report on their targets over time, considering things like base years, baseline emissions, reduction rates, and emission levels. It raises questions about how different target types like absolute, intensity and business as usual targets will be quantified and accounted for. It discusses the negotiations underway to develop guidance on accounting and suggests more clarity is needed on accounting for national targets and sectoral policies and measures.
This document discusses integrating the content and timing of reporting and review provisions under Articles 6 and 13 of the Paris Agreement. It notes that while reporting and review are closely linked, the sequencing is important - reporting guidelines should be decided before review guidelines. Integrating the two poses challenges around capacity, accounting methodologies, and countries' differing experiences. The document proposes forming an expert committee to further address these issues and provide comments on draft texts, with the goal of developing solutions that acknowledge countries' differing capacities while maintaining fairness.
1) The document outlines key questions to consider for the Global Stocktake under the Paris Agreement, including questions about collective progress on mitigation, adaptation, finance, technology development and transfer, and capacity building.
2) It discusses assessing whether the goals of the Paris Agreement are being achieved, and identifying opportunities and challenges, lessons learned, and recommendations to strengthen climate action.
3) The document raises questions about how to ensure an integrated consideration of inputs across topics during the technical assessment and how to inform parties of outputs to enhance climate commitments and cooperation.
The document discusses reporting provisions under Articles 13 and 6.2 of the Paris Agreement. It finds that the draft Article 6.2 reporting text generally works well, with sufficient alignment to information required in the biennial transparency report and structured summary. It suggests a few potential tweaks that could be made in Glasgow, such as adding lines to the initial report section about environmental integrity, sustainable development, and human rights. However, most further work on reporting guidance is recommended for the post-Glasgow work program.
Guidance for accounting: emissions intensity goals and goals relative to BAU ...OECD Environment
This document discusses accounting considerations and guidance needs for different types of mitigation contributions under the Paris Agreement, including emissions intensity goals and goals relative to baseline emissions levels. Key issues addressed include requirements to quantify future emissions in the target year, developing reference levels for corresponding adjustments under cooperative mechanisms, data sources and guidance for intensity targets, defining consistency and review procedures for baseline scenarios, and inclusion of policies and cutoff years. Recommendations are made around enhancing transparency of assumptions in baseline scenarios and including all adopted policies with significant emissions impacts.
CCXG Global Forum September 2017, BGA Accounting for diverse NDCs: Unpacking ...OECD Environment
This document outlines challenges and suggestions for developing accounting guidance for mitigation targets in nationally determined contributions (NDCs). It discusses the meaning of "accounting" for NDCs, challenges such as different target types across parties and land-related issues, and suggestions like drawing from existing approaches under the UNFWP Convention and Kyoto Protocol, allowing parties flexibility in methodologies, and identifying remaining issues to resolve.
GEF's Support and Experience on Capacity Building for Transparency GEF''s, Du...OECD Environment
Capacity building is integral to the Global Environment Facility's (GEF) support for mitigation projects. The GEF has provided $118.9 million for mitigation capacity building in 2015. Capacity building is also a core part of GEF support across all of its focal areas and is highly integrated into project design. The GEF's support for capacity building helps to strengthen institutions, improve strategies and policies, and enable action at the national level over the long term. This includes support for national communications, biennial update reports, nationally determined contributions, and the new Capacity-building Initiative for Transparency.
Breakout Group A and D summary slides CCXG Global Forum September 2017OECD Environment
The document summarizes discussions from breakout sessions at a Climate Change Expert Group meeting on accounting for nationally determined contributions (NDCs). Key points discussed include:
1) The purpose of mitigation accounting is to transparently explain and track progress towards greenhouse gas emission targets. Greenhouse gas inventories are the fundamental tool to do so consistently over time.
2) Issues to resolve include whether targets should be single- or multi-year, how to account for land use emissions, and how to handle NDCs with multiple targets.
3) Accounting guidance is needed before, during, and after NDC implementation to inform communication, track progress, and account for changes over time in things like business as usual projections
The document summarizes discussions from a climate change expert group meeting on implementing provisions of the Paris Agreement. Key points discussed include:
1) Transitioning Clean Development Mechanism activities to Article 6.4 will require coordination between various actors like host countries, project participants, and the Article 6.4 supervisory body.
2) Host countries will play a greater role under Article 6.4 compared to the Clean Development Mechanism, and capacity building may be needed to assess impacts on countries' climate commitments.
3) Improving electronic reporting systems could help reduce the reporting burden for countries and improve consistency and quality of climate reporting.
CCXG Global Forum September 2017, BGD Accounting within the NDC cycle by Chri...OECD Environment
The document discusses when accounting guidance could be useful in the NDC (Nationally Determined Contribution) cycle. It suggests accounting guidance may help when countries communicate their NDC, when they track progress during implementation in biennial reports, and after the target period to measure actual achievement against the target. It also presents a diagram showing how accounting guidance could be applied at different stages of the first NDC cycle, including communication of NDCs, implementation, reporting, and accounting for the first NDC. The document raises questions about when in the cycle accounting guidance should be applied and what implications delayed inventory reporting timeframes have for accounting.
The document summarizes key discussions from a virtual climate change forum. It addresses transparency issues around common reporting formats to track climate progress and links between Article 6 negotiations and reporting. It also discusses country experiences with updating NDCs, emphasizing ownership and coordination. Finally, it notes the importance of long-term climate strategies to drive short-term targets, and challenges posed by COVID-19 to climate processes.
The document discusses the role of international carbon markets in helping countries achieve their net-zero emissions targets. It finds that most countries do not specify how they intend to use carbon markets. Those that do are adopting different approaches. The suitability of different types of carbon credit activities is also examined, finding some like emission removal technologies are well-suited while others like avoided deforestation have limitations. Risks of overreliance on carbon markets are also discussed, as are perspectives of seller and buyer countries.
CCXG Global Forum September 2017, BGA Accounting for diverse NDCs: Unpacking ...OECD Environment
This document discusses accounting principles and guidance for tracking progress towards Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) under the Paris Agreement. It outlines key principles such as promoting transparency, accuracy and avoiding double counting. It also examines how accounting guidance could clarify and implement these principles for different types of NDCs. Examples given include guidance to avoid double counting of emissions reductions from harvested wood products and clarifying how countries can account for natural disturbances. The document also discusses drawing from existing approaches under the UNFCCC and Kyoto Protocol, and introducing an "accounting balance" to clearly track progress towards NDCs.
Breakout Group 1 and 5 summary slides CCXG Global Forum September 2017OECD Environment
This document summarizes key discussions from breakout groups at a Climate Change Expert Group meeting. The groups discussed how the 2018 Facilitative Dialogue can enhance climate action and provide predictability for investments by showcasing good practices and highlighting mitigation opportunities. They also noted that the modalities and format of the Facilitative Dialogue are important as they can influence outcomes by allowing for simple, focused, and dynamic discussions. A second group discussed upcoming discussions on new and updated NDCs and how the structure and timing of the Facilitative Dialogue process could affect the content agreed upon at COP24.
"Business as usual" baselines: Challenges for tracking NDCs by Andrew PragOECD Environment
The document discusses the challenges of tracking progress towards climate change targets that are expressed as reductions from "business as usual" baselines. Nearly half of countries' intended nationally determined contributions rely on business as usual baselines, but there is no agreed definition or process for setting these baselines. Baseline projections can vary significantly depending on modeling techniques, assumptions, and circumstances. More transparency is needed around countries' baseline scenarios in order to properly assess expected global emissions levels and track overall progress towards climate goals.
The document discusses financing a just transition away from coal. It describes the Powering Past Coal Alliance (PPCA), a global coalition committed to phasing out coal-fired power by 2030 in OECD/EU countries and 2040 in non-OECD countries. The PPCA has 50 national governments, 49 subnational governments, and 70 private sector organizations as members. The document outlines the PPCA's priorities to 2025, which include diplomatic leadership, narrative building, expertise sharing, and encouraging new members and commitments to action. It then provides information on joining a panel discussion on financing a just transition from coal.
The document discusses financing a just transition away from coal. It summarizes the goals and membership of the Powering Past Coal Alliance (PPCA), which aims to phase out coal-fired power by 2030 in OECD/EU countries and by 2040 in non-OECD countries. It outlines the PPCA's priorities to 2025, which include diplomatic leadership, narrative building, expertise sharing, and gaining new membership commitments. The rest of the document discusses challenges and solutions for financing a just transition, including the need for public and private sector action, policy leadership, and product/financing innovations to support affected workers and communities.
FACTORS CONTRIBUTING AN ORGANIZATION TO INVEST IN CARBON OFFSET PROJECTS-IJMSSBatro N Ngilangwa
This document discusses factors that contribute to an organization investing in carbon offset projects. It explores why compliance with environmental regulations is a main driver, but also discusses additional motivations like increasing energy efficiency, improving shareholder value, responding to consumer and market pressures, boosting competitiveness, and fulfilling corporate social responsibility. The document also provides context on carbon markets and trading, and outlines the research methodology used, which was a literature review.
This document provides an overview of ESG principles and sustainable finance. It discusses key ESG factors including environmental, social and governance issues. It also outlines major international agreements and regulatory developments driving sustainable finance. Examples of sustainable financing instruments like green bonds, loans and sustainability-linked bonds are presented. The document concludes with two case studies, one on an ADB clean technology fund financing a geothermal plant, and another on a sustainability-linked corporate bond and credit facility.
Climate risk disclosure: What are the financial and asset impacts of physical...Briony Turner
This presentation was given as part of Futurebuild 2020 | 4 March | Session: How do we achieve '100% net zero carbon'? You will need to download it to use the hyperlinks.
Find out more about the recommendations arising from my PhD in this LinkedIn post: Stepping out -recommendations for mainstreaming climate change adaptation of England's social housing stock: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/stepping-out-recommendations-mainstreaming-climate-change-turner/
1) The document discusses opportunities and challenges for transitioning to a green economy, with a focus on business leadership and policy innovations in Indonesia.
2) It notes that while definitions of a green economy vary, key aspects include increased investments that enhance natural capital while reducing ecological risks and promoting sustainable and low-carbon development.
3) Examples of business and government leadership on green growth initiatives in countries like South Korea, Kazakhstan, Cambodia, Malaysia, and Indonesia are provided, with Indonesia highlighted for several policy innovations in renewable energy, CSR legislation, and other areas.
2020, the latest developments in Environment, Social and Governance investingnetwealthInvest
In this presentation, we discuss current ESG themes, including regulatory changes and key environmental, social and governance factors that investors need to understand in 2020.
"Policy Development, Implementation, & Review", presented by Ms Jihei Song (Korea Institute for International Economic Policy) at the 2022 ProSPER.Net Leadership Programme, 6 December, 2022.
The OECD Corporate Governance Committee is reviewing the G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance. The review was launched in November 2021 and will be completed in 2023. OECD, G20 and FSB members participate in the review, as well as other countries through the Committee’s regional Roundtables (Asia, Latin America and the Middle East and North Africa).
The Terms of Reference and Roadmap agreed by the Corporate Governance Committee sets out the main priorities and timeline for the review. The review’s overall goal is to strengthen the Principles, in particular by adapting relevant elements to the post COVID-19 environment, taking into account any structural effects of the crisis on capital markets and corporate governance practices. The revised Principles will aim to strengthen corporate sector resilience through better risk management and to improve companies’ access to finance from capital markets.
In October 2021, OECD Ministers and G20 Leaders supported the Committee’s decision to review the Principles. Ministers and Leaders “recognised the importance of good corporate governance frameworks and well-functioning capital markets to support the recovery, and looked forward to the review of the G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance”.
A public consultation on proposed revisions to the Principles will be held in fall 2022.
Presentations given by Jouni Keronen (CLC), Stephanie Pfeiffer (IIGCC), Maximillian Horster (South Pole Group), Véronique Menou (MSCI ESG), Lauren Smart (Trucost), Yulia Sofronova and Sagarika Chatterjee (UN PRI) in a carbon foot printing workshop organised by FINSIF, IIGCC, Climate Leadership Council and Sitra.
The report sets out some credible concrete examples in which a just transition for workers has already been implemented in European countries, specifically the Netherlands, Germany, Spain, France and Scotland. It also provides concise presentations of conditions of Nordic peers in Sweden and Norway, and it also examines the example of Canada, where climate policy has been prepared and implemented in a way that is exceptionally fair and socially inclusive.
This report is part of the Central Confederation of Finnish Trade Unions SAK Time of Opportunities project, which studies new phenomena in the world of work.
Session 6 - Presentation by Liesel van Ast, UNEPOECD Environment
This document provides an overview of sustainable finance initiatives by UNEP FI. It discusses how financial institutions are working towards sustainable finance through leadership, knowledge development, and collaborative projects. It highlights opportunities in Eastern Europe around ecosystems, climate change, and accessing the Green Climate Fund. The document also outlines UNEP FI's 2017 regional roundtable in Geneva to scale up sustainable finance across banking, insurance, and investment in Europe.
The Vice-Minister for Global Environmental Affairs of Japan's Ministry of the Environment outlined plans to promote financing for low-carbon initiatives through public-private partnerships. The plans aim to develop ambitious strategies for tackling climate change and building a low-carbon society after Japan's energy policy was disrupted by the Fukushima nuclear accident. Specific initiatives include funds to invest in green building upgrades, low-carbon cities, and technologies as well as a bilateral offset credit mechanism to disseminate Japanese environmental technologies overseas.
Sitra and impact investing soc-sib_august282019Business Turku
Sitra is a public organization established in 1967 by the Finnish parliament to develop Finland's future success. It works on future-oriented projects and invests to promote societal impact.
Sitra promotes impact investing in Finland, especially social impact bonds (SIBs) which link private investment to social outcomes. Sitra has been involved in several SIB projects in areas like occupational well-being, immigrant integration, children's services, and elderly independence.
Impact co-creation is an approach Sitra uses where public, private, and community stakeholders collaborate to define social challenges, outcomes, and solutions. This ensures commitment and focuses on targeted impact. Sitra has used this approach in projects on employment and prevention.
The financial industry has historically
played a number of fundamental roles in
shaping the modern world.
The activities of the industry supported the development of
the free market, economic expansion, improving the quality of
life, personal and national security, and enabled individuals and
organizations to save and invest. Fulfilling these functions requires
the financial sector to constantly take care of its reputation
and trust in the financial system and respond to the changing
expectations of an increasing number of stakeholders. Today,
the industry is at a key point in its evolution. In the face of climate
change and the consequent changes in investment preferences,
stakeholders expect financial institutions to contribute to a
fairer and more sustainable world and to create a new face of
the financial services sector in which profit and social impact can
coexist.
Why now? The pandemic has reinforced the need to build
a sense of purpose, strengthen confidence in banks,
and help address global issues the economy faces, such
as transformation in the face of climate change. The
accumulation in the public debate of issues such as prosperity,
development, social responsibility, justice, conflict, security, ecology
and sustainable development has created a turning point in
history. To continue to grow, the financial services industry needs
to take care of making profits in tune with multiple stakeholders,
keeping consumers at the center of everything they do. And these
consumers are more concerned than ever about climate change
and expect real action from business.
More: https://www2.deloitte.com/pl/pl/pages/zarzadzania-procesami-i-strategiczne/articles/sustainable-finance-magazine/sustainable-finance-magazine-wydanie-pierwsze.html
The Case for a Green Resilient RecoveryNigel Topping
As the impact of COVID-19 continues to be felt, non state actors (NSA) including business leaders, investors, and local government leaders globally have (in alignment with the UNSG) been vocal in their support for a Green, Resilient Recovery (GRR) and the opportunity to “build back better” by accelerating the transition to a resilient, zero emissions future.
Many global academic and technical experts have published widely on core principles to underpin a successful recovery, and have outlined emerging evidence on the compelling economic case for GRR, alongside critical co-benefits in public health, decent jobs and enhanced resilience to climate change.
This document seeks to bring together in a single place an analysis published by key members of the NSA community on GRR, with four key objectives:
– Summarize and consolidate key insights, providing a centralised reference point for the broad base of published work to date
– Lay out the definitive economic and social case for GRR, and its implications to climate crisis, as it exists so far
– Highlight sector-specific asks for GRR in the areas of transport, power, buildings, heavy industry and nature
– Provide a view on the policy action and NSA proof points (evolving daily) that demonstrate ongoing commitment from NSA actors to GRR
This paper draws directly upon the exceptional body of work and perspectives to date published by leading organizations, initiatives and partners of the Marrakech Partnership for Global Climate Action, including:
• IMF
• ETC, MPP, WEF
• Smiths School of Economics
• WMB
• PRI
• VividEconomics
• ICP Hub
The situation is evolving at pace, and members of the NSA community are continuing to advance the GRR work and action agenda. In addition to supporting positive action on GRR by policymakers and NSA as part of our broader objectives, these members will:
– Continue to represent and provide a platform for the best thinking of the NSA community in advocating positive response to GRR from policymakers
– Investigate and publish a more detailed business case to reflect the benefits of GRR as an opportunity to accelerate climate action and the transition to a resilient, zero emissions future, to be published in September 2020.
Stakeholder management seminar the petroleum industry bill as focusBolaji Okusaga
Effective Stakeholder Management is essential for sucess in policy and legislative environments. This Seminar looks at the dynamics of Stakeholder Relationship which can aid the passage of one of Nigeria's most sought-after piece of legislation - the Petroleum Industry Bill.
The document analyzes opportunities for Clean Development Mechanism projects in India. It identifies priority projects based on India's development priorities and emissions projections. Key sectors for CDM projects are energy and industry. Priority project types include renewable energy projects (e.g. biomass, solar, wind), energy efficiency projects in industry (e.g. cement, iron and steel), and end-use efficiency (e.g. lighting, appliances). The government of India supports CDM conditional on principles like technology transfer and additionality of funds, and has established institutions to evaluate potential CDM projects.
This document provides an overview of Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) project opportunities in India. It discusses India's climate change policy, government stance on CDM, recent emissions data, potential mitigation options, and priority CDM projects. The government of India generally supports CDM conditional on principles like hosting country determining sustainable development criteria and ensuring technology transfer. Priority CDM sectors identified include energy, with project examples like renewable energy, demand-side management, and methane recovery. Research organizations are working to build awareness and capacity for Indian stakeholders to engage in CDM.
Similar to CCXG Oct 2019 Japan's long term strategy: How it has evolved the financial sector and business - Yukari Takamura (20)
An Outline of the EBRD’s Approach to the Water Sector.pdfOECD Environment
Presented at the 11th roundtable on financing water in Brussels, Belgium on 30-31 May, 2024.
Intervention by David Tyler, Associate Director – Head of PPI Unit, Sustainable Infrastructure Group, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development
Financing River Basin Management Planning in RomaniaOECD Environment
Presented at the 11th roundtable on financing water in Brussels, Belgium on 30-31 May, 2024.
Intervention by Gheorghe Constantin, Ministry of Environment, Water and Forests of Romania
UNECE and the Water Convention: Session 5 Financing River Basin Management Pl...OECD Environment
Presented at the 11th roundtable on financing water in Brussels, Belgium on 30-31 May, 2024.
Intervention by Tamara Kutonova, National Policy Dialogue Programme Manager, Environment Division, UNECE
The European Investment Banks’ Water Projects in EaP countriesOECD Environment
Presented at the 11th roundtable on financing water in Brussels, Belgium on 30-31 May, 2024.
Intervention by James Hunt, Senior Engineer, Water Division, European Investment Bank
European integration of Ukraine in the “water quality” sectorOECD Environment
Presented at the 11th roundtable on financing water in Brussels, Belgium on 30-31 May, 2024.
Ministerial Speech by Ruslan Strilets, Minister, Ministry of Environmental Protection and Natural Resources, Ukraine
Presented at the 11th roundtable on financing water in Brussels, Belgium on 30-31 May, 2024.
Intervention by Günter Liebel, Former Secretary General, Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Regions and Water Management, Austria
The Enabling Environment for Investment in Water Security.pdfOECD Environment
Presented at the 11th roundtable on financing water in Brussels, Belgium on 30-31 May, 2024.
Intervention by Guy Halpern, Policy Analyst, Environment Directorate, OECD
AFD’s activity in EU’s Eastern Partnership Countries in a nutshell.pdfOECD Environment
Presented at the 11th roundtable on financing water in Brussels, Belgium on 30-31 May, 2024.
Intervention by Tanguy Vincent, Task Team Leader Agriculture, Rural Development, Biodiversity, Agence Française de Développement (AFD)
Presented at the 11th roundtable on financing water in Brussels, Belgium on 30-31 May, 2024.
Intervention by Dina Pons, Managing Partner, Incofin Investment Management
Financing of River Basin Management Plans in Ukraine.pdfOECD Environment
Presented at the 11th roundtable on financing water in Brussels, Belgium on 30-31 May, 2024.
Intervention by Mykhaylo Yanchuk, Head of the State Water Agency, Ukraine
Presented at the 11th roundtable on financing water in Brussels, Belgium on 30-31 May, 2024.
Intervention by Sophie Tremolet, Water Team Lead, Environment Directorate, OECD
Insights on Nature-Based Solutions from the European Commission.pdfOECD Environment
Presented at the 11th roundtable on financing water in Brussels, Belgium on 30-31 May, 2024.
Intervention by Karin Zaunberger, Policy Officer, European Commission, Directorate General for Environment (DG ENV)
PPTs - TAIEX TSI MNB-OECD-EC Launch Event: Technical implementation of the Su...OECD Environment
Presentations from the TAIEX TSI MNB-OECD-EC Launch Event: Technical implementation of the Supervisory Framework for Assessing Nature-related Financial Risks to the Hungarian financial sector, 7 June 2024.
OECD Green Talks LIVE | Diving deeper: the evolving landscape for assessing w...OECD Environment
Water is critical for meeting commitments of the Paris Agreement and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Our economies rely on water, with recent estimates putting the economic value of water and freshwater ecosystems at USD 58 trillion - equivalent to 60% of global GDP. At the same time, water related risks are increasing in frequency and scale in the context of climate change.
How are investments shaping our economies and societies exposure to water risk? What role can the financial system play in supporting water security? And how can increased understanding of how finance both impacts and depends on water resources spur action towards greater water security?
This OECD Green Talks LIVE on Tuesday 14 May 2024 from 15:00 to 16:00 CEST discussed the evolving landscape for assessing water risks to the financial system.
OECD Policy Analyst Lylah Davies presented key findings and recommendations from recent OECD work on assessing the financial materiality of water-related risks, including the recently published paper “Watered down? Investigating the financial materiality of water-related risks” and was joined by experts to discuss relevant initiatives underway.
Detlef Van Vuuren- Integrated modelling for interrelated crises.pdfOECD Environment
This OECD technical workshop will bring together leading experts on economic, biophysical, and integrated assessment modelling of the interactions between climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. The workshop will take stock of ongoing modelling efforts to develop quantitative pathways to study the drivers and impacts of the triple planetary crisis, and the policies to address it. The aim is to identify robust modelling approaches to inform the work for the upcoming OECD Environmental Outlook.
Thomas Hertel- Integrated Policies for the Triple Planetary Crisis.pdfOECD Environment
This OECD technical workshop will bring together leading experts on economic, biophysical, and integrated assessment modelling of the interactions between climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. The workshop will take stock of ongoing modelling efforts to develop quantitative pathways to study the drivers and impacts of the triple planetary crisis, and the policies to address it. The aim is to identify robust modelling approaches to inform the work for the upcoming OECD Environmental Outlook.
Jon Sampedro - Assessing synergies and trade offs for health and sustainable ...OECD Environment
This OECD technical workshop will bring together leading experts on economic, biophysical, and integrated assessment modelling of the interactions between climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. The workshop will take stock of ongoing modelling efforts to develop quantitative pathways to study the drivers and impacts of the triple planetary crisis, and the policies to address it. The aim is to identify robust modelling approaches to inform the work for the upcoming OECD Environmental Outlook.
Astrid Bos - Identifying trade offs & searching for synergies.pdfOECD Environment
This OECD technical workshop will bring together leading experts on economic, biophysical, and integrated assessment modelling of the interactions between climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. The workshop will take stock of ongoing modelling efforts to develop quantitative pathways to study the drivers and impacts of the triple planetary crisis, and the policies to address it. The aim is to identify robust modelling approaches to inform the work for the upcoming OECD Environmental Outlook.
Ruth Delzeit - Modelling environmental and socio-economic impacts of cropland...OECD Environment
This OECD technical workshop will bring together leading experts on economic, biophysical, and integrated assessment modelling of the interactions between climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. The workshop will take stock of ongoing modelling efforts to develop quantitative pathways to study the drivers and impacts of the triple planetary crisis, and the policies to address it. The aim is to identify robust modelling approaches to inform the work for the upcoming OECD Environmental Outlook.
Wilfried Winiwarter - Implementing nitrogen pollution control pathways in the...OECD Environment
This OECD technical workshop will bring together leading experts on economic, biophysical, and integrated assessment modelling of the interactions between climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. The workshop will take stock of ongoing modelling efforts to develop quantitative pathways to study the drivers and impacts of the triple planetary crisis, and the policies to address it. The aim is to identify robust modelling approaches to inform the work for the upcoming OECD Environmental Outlook.
Exploring low emissions development opportunities in food systemsCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Christopher Martius (CIFOR-ICRAF) at "Side event 60th sessions of the UNFCCC Subsidiary Bodies - Sustainable Bites: Innovating Low Emission Food Systems One Country at a Time" on 13 June 2024
Trichogramma spp. is an efficient egg parasitoids that potentially assist to manage the insect-pests from the field condition by parasiting the host eggs. To mass culture this egg parasitoids effectively, we need to culture another stored grain pest- Rice Meal Moth (Corcyra Cephalonica). After rearing this pest, the eggs of Corcyra will carry the potential Trichogramma spp., which is an Hymenopteran Wasp. The detailed Methodologies of rearing both Corcyra Cephalonica and Trichogramma spp. have described on this ppt.
GFW Office Hours: How to Use Planet Imagery on Global Forest Watch_June 11, 2024Global Forest Watch
Earlier this year, we hosted a webinar on Deforestation Exposed: Using High Resolution Satellite Imagery to Investigate Forest Clearing.
If you missed this webinar or have any questions about Norway’s International Climate & Forests Initiative (NICFI) Satellite Data Program and Planet’s high-resolution mosaics, please join our expert-led office hours for an overview of how to use Planet’s satellite imagery on GFW, including how to access and analyze the data.
POPE FRANCIS 2ND ENCYCLICAL "Laudato Si" is the second encyclical of Pope Fra...AdelinePdelaCruz
"Laudato Si" is the second encyclical of Pope Francis, released on May 24, 2015. Its title comes from the opening words of the encyclical in Latin, which mean "Praise Be to You." The document focuses on the theme of care for our common home, urging humanity to take action to address environmental degradation, climate change, and social inequality. Pope Francis calls for an integral ecology that considers the interconnectedness of environmental, social, economic, and spiritual dimensions.
The modification of an existing product or the formulation of a new product to fill a newly identified market niche or customer need are both examples of product development. This study generally developed and conducted the formulation of aramang baked products enriched with malunggay conducted by the researchers. Specifically, it answered the acceptability level in terms of taste, texture, flavor, odor, and color also the overall acceptability of enriched aramang baked products. The study used the frequency distribution for evaluators to determine the acceptability of enriched aramang baked products enriched with malunggay. As per sensory evaluation conducted by the researchers, it was proven that aramang baked products enriched with malunggay was acceptable in terms of Odor, Taste, Flavor, Color, and Texture. Based on the results of sensory evaluation of enriched aramang baked products proven that three (3) treatments were all highly acceptable in terms of variable Odor, Taste, Flavor, Color and Textures conducted by the researchers.
Notes on National Green Tribunal, Environmental laws
CCXG Oct 2019 Japan's long term strategy: How it has evolved the financial sector and business - Yukari Takamura
1. Japan’s long term strategy
How it has involved the financial sector
and businesses
OECD/IEA CCXG
1 October 2019
Yukari TAKAMURA
(Institute for Future Initiatives, The University of Tokyo)
e-mail: yukari.takamura@ifi.u-tokyo.ac.jp
1
2. Elaboration process of LTS
• 4 Jun. 2018: Instruction by Prime Minister to launch elaboration
process of LTS and to establish an expert meeting
• 3 Aug. 2018: First meeting
• 4 Sept. 2018: Second meeting, focusing on “Innovation”
• 19 Nov. 2018: Third meeting, focusing on “Green finance” ”Green
Business” “Local”
• 21 Dec. 2018: 4th meeting, focusing on elements to be included in
the LTS
• 2 Apr. 2019: 5th meeting to issue a recommendation on framework
and main points of LTS
– See its recommendation, materials and summary of discussion of the
meetings https://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/singi/parikyoutei/ (in
Japanese)
• 23 Apr. 2019 Joint meeting of Environmental Council and of the
Industrial Structure Council to consider draft of LTS
• 25 Apr. to 16 May 2019: Public comment
• 11 Jun. 2019: LTS approved by the Cabinet
2
3. Long-term goal and vision in LTS
• Long-term goal and vision
– Aiming to accomplish a “decarbonized society” as early as possible in
the second half of this century, while boldly taking measures towards
the reduction of GHGs emissions by 80% by 2050.
• Sectoral vision
– Energy transition and decarbonization toward 2050, by exploring all
options.
– Establishing new production processes to achieve decarbonized
manufacturing with disruptive innovation
– Challenging for “Well-to-Wheel Zero Emission”
– Creating the “Circulating and Ecological Economy” advanced local
decarbonization, and achieve the SDGs with integrated improvements
on the environment, economy and society, thereby achieving a carbon
neutral, resilient and comfortable community and living by 2050.
• One of the basic Principles
– Realizing “a virtuous cycle of environment and growth” towards the
vision with business-led disruptive innovation
3
4. Drastic changes from the past
• Drastic changes from conventional climate plans/
strategies
– Decarbonization (net zero emission) goal
• Aiming to accomplish “decarbonized society” = net zero emission
• Some more clear sectorial goals for decarbonization
• Challenge towards “zero-carbon steel” by 2100 by the Japan Iron
and Steel Federation
– Approach
• Setting an aspirational goal and vision and back-casting from such
goal and vision, rather than bottom up from the current
undertakings
– Shift in paradigm: LTS as “Climate” strategy as well as
“Economic” strategy
• Pursuing overcoming “antagonistic” view on relationship of
climate and economy
4
5. Statement by Prime Minister Abe in the
Growth Strategy Meeting(4 June 2018)
• ”…Climate actions are no longer question of cost for
companies: rather they are source of their
competitiveness… ”
• “Now change called as a virtuous cycle in the
environment and the economy has been truly
accelerating at the global scale and with incredible
speed for these 5 years”
• “…with view to driving decarbonization toward
2050,…we need to realize a paradigm shift, by turning
such virtuous cycle in the environment and the
economy increasingly and thereby promoting
innovation led by business…”
5
6. Global investment in clean energy
6Source:BNEF, 2018
More than twice as much ($265.8 billion) was invested in clean energy
(excluding hydropower) than coal and gas (around $130 billion) in 2017.
2017 is the second highest year after 2015.
7. How the process has involved
businesses and financial sector?
• In addition to public comment process, the small expert
group involves businesses and financial sector. Half of
members come from businesses and financial sector.
– 4 members from businesses, including chairman of the
Keidanren (Hitachi), Toyota, Nippon Steel, and insurance
company.
– 1 member from GPIF.
• Uniqueness of the LTS process is that the group elaborated
its recommendation by itself.
– Elements contained in the recommendation are composed, in
principle, of what were stated and/or proposed by members.
• Valuable inputs from businesses and financial sector on
– Global trends of decarbonization, technological changes…
– How financial market is looking at Japanese businesses?
7
8. Members of the Meeting
Name Affiliation and Title
Takeshi
UCHIYAMADA
Chairman of the Board of Directors, Toyota Motor Corporation
Junko EDAHIRO President, Institute for Studies in Happiness, Economy and Society
(ISHES) / Professor, Shizenkan University
Shinichi KITAOKA
(Chair)
Emeritus Professor, The University of Tokyo; President, Japan
International Cooperation Agency
Kosei SHINDO Representative Director and Chairman, NIPPON STEEL
CORPORATION
Shuzo SUMI Chairman of the Board, Tokio Marine Holdings
Yukari TAKAMURA Professor, The University of Tokyo
Hiroaki
NAKANISHI
Chairman, Keidanren (Japan Business Federation); Executive
Chairman, Hitachi, Ltd.
Hiromichi
MIZUNO
Executive Managing Director (Chief Investment Officer),
Government Pension Investment Fund (GPIF)
Masahi MORI Mayor, Toyama City
Itaru YASUI Emeritus Professor, The University of Tokyo; Former Vice-
President, United Nations University
8
9. Impacts, benefits and challenges (1)
• Main points of LTS based on recommendation from the
group are well accepted by businesses.
– As of 31 July 2019, 77 companies and business associations
adopted its own long term vision, followed by 184 which is
elaborating its vision.
– See more details at the Keidanren website
https://www.keidanren.or.jp/policy/2019/001.html
• Climate financial risk disclosure (ex. TCFD) and
engagement by financial institution have changed
business perception.
– Science Based Targets:about 90% of listed companies
already set target in line with the Paris Agreement long
term goal or committed to set it.
– TCFD:about 90% of listed companies has undertaken TCFD.
9
10. Impacts, benefits and challenges (2)
• Civil society criticizes the process as well as
content of LTS.
• How to develop and implement short- and
mid- term climate actions in light of LTS and its
long term goal?
– What would be the role of policy? What would
be necessary policies to enhance and accelerate
climate actions for instance by businesses?
10
11. 11
Thank you for your attention!
Yukari TAKAMURA
E-mail: yukari.takamura@ifi.u-tokyo.ac.jp