Presentations given by Jouni Keronen (CLC), Stephanie Pfeiffer (IIGCC), Maximillian Horster (South Pole Group), Véronique Menou (MSCI ESG), Lauren Smart (Trucost), Yulia Sofronova and Sagarika Chatterjee (UN PRI) in a carbon foot printing workshop organised by FINSIF, IIGCC, Climate Leadership Council and Sitra.

1. Carbon foot printing workshop
Helsinki
17th June 2015

2. Agenda
8:30 Welcome – Jouni Keronen, CEO, Climate Leadership Council (CLC)
8:35 Introduction – Stephanie Pfeifer, IIGCC CEO
• Global Investor Platform on Climate Action – background to workshops
8:45 Presentations from carbon foot print service providers
• Maximilian Horster – South Pole Group
• Véronique Menou - MSCI ESG
• Lauren Smart - Trucost
9:40 The Montreal Carbon Pledge and trends in investor actions – Yulia
Sofronova and Sagarika Chatterjee, PRI
9:50 Discussion with asset owners and managers
• Tiina Landau - Ilmarinen Mutual Pension Insurance Company
• Mika Leskinen – OP Group
• Aila Aho – Nordea
• Sagarika Chatterjee – PRI
10:30 Close

3. PwC CEO Survey Launch, February 25, 2013
3

4. ”In economics, things take longer
to happen than you think they
will, and they happen faster than
you thought they could.”
Rudiger Dornbusch
4

6. Climate Leadership Council;
Members 18.5.2015 and board for 6/2014-6/2016
J Keronen, Climate Leadership Council

7. 7
“We’re the first generation to feel the impact of climate
change and the last generation that can do something
about it.” Gov. Jay Inslee
Thank You!

8. IIGCC – the collaborative platform for
investors on climate change
 More than 100 members in 9 countries, representing over
€10 trillion in assets
IIGCC’s Objectives
 Policies and frameworks that
support the low carbon transition
 A robust carbon price signal
 Energy efficiency measures
 Removal of perverse incentives
 Improved investor awareness
 Adoption of best practice
 Integration of climate risk and
opportunities
 Improved investor reporting
Engage on
policy that
supports
move to low
carbon
economy
Inform and
showcase
investment
practices
8

9. Climate Change Investment Solutions:
A Guide for Asset Owners – How to use it
 Further engage with investment
committees and trustee boards
about climate change through:
 Distributing the guide to investment
committee and board members,
holding in-house workshops,
incorporating the actions into
investment and/or board offsite
meetings
 Share with investment consultants
and fund managers (across asset
classes) to foster dialogue and
action
 Bring everyone up to the same level
of understanding
 Identify where your fund is strong
and where it might consider taking
further action
 Prioritize actions and set objectives,
targets, and milestones
Find the Guide here:
www.iigcc.org

10. Map of investment solutions
10
Strategic review
Mitigation investment
actions
Reduce carbon intensity
of existing assets
Invest in low carbon,
energy efficient assets
Adaptation investment
actions
Reduce climate
vulnerability of existing
assets
Invest in climate
adaptation opportunities
Strategic asset allocation

11.  Joint initiative of the investor networks
 Launched during Paris Climate Week
 Mentioned by French Finance Minister Michel Sapin in his address to
the Climate Finance Day
Highlighting investor actions

12. Investor Platform for Climate Actions
12

13. Carbon foot printing investment portfolios
Why now?

14. IIGCC’s carbon foot printing workshops
European roadshow for investors
 London – November 2014: Getting started with carbon
foot printing, keys for asset owners.
 Amsterdam – March 2015: Different metrics for different
purposes - managing carbon asset risk or financing the
low-carbon transition.
 Stockholm – May 2015: So you have a footprint – now
what?
 Copenhagen – June 2015: Regional drivers of investor
carbon measurement and communications.
 Helsinki – June 2015: Setting internal carbon foot print
investment policies and the Montreal Carbon Pledge
 Next up – (TBC) Paris, Geneva/Zurich
14

15. IIGCC Sample portfolio
Top overweight and underweight holdings
15
Company name
Portfolio
Weight
Benchmark
Weight Over weight
SAP SE 4.01% 0.1828% 3.83%
QUALCOMM, Inc. 3.62% 0.3471% 3.28%
Visa, Inc. 2.60% 0.2930% 2.30%
Royal Bk Scot Grp 2.25% 0.0412% 2.21%
Grainger W W Inc 2.05% 0.0426% 2.01%
Axa 2.07% 0.1231% 1.95%
Standard Chartered Plc 2.07% 0.1255% 1.94%
Sumitomo Mitsui Fg 1.96% 0.1426% 1.81%
Hong Kong Exchange 1.69% 0.0656% 1.62%
Bayer Motoren Werk 1.72% 0.1099% 1.61%
Company name
Portfolio
Weight
Benchmark
Weight
Under
weight
Apple, Inc. 1.7% -1.7%
Johnson & Johnson 0.8% -0.8%
Wells Fargo & Co New 0.7% -0.7%
General Electric Co 0.7% -0.7%
Nestle SA 0.7% -0.7%
Jpmorgan Chase & Co 0.6% -0.6%
Procter & Gamble Co 0.6% -0.6%
Exxon Mobil Corp 0.5% 1.1% -0.6%
Novartis Ag 0.6% -0.6%
Verizon Communications, Inc. 0.6% -0.6%
TOP 10 OVERWEIGHT TOP 10 UNDERWEIGHT
IIGCC developed a sample global equities portfolio with 100 companies.* The
portfolio was not designed to be low-carbon - it could be anyone’s portfolio.
*Copies of the full portfolio were distributed during the event. Contact Morgan LaManna
at IIGCC for a copy or visit the Members’ Area of IIGCC’s website for more resources.

16. IIGCC Sample portfolio
Sector distribution
16
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
IIGCC Portfolio
MSCI ACWI
 Global equity portfolio - 100 stocks
 Benchmarked against MSCI ACWI

17. Key questions for service providers
17
1. How do you measure carbon footprint?
2. Is the IIGCC portfolio more or less carbon intensive than its benchmark?
3. How do you explain key differences?
4. What is your view on
 product-related emissions
 financed emissions
 double counting
 future emissions

18. The Climate Impact of Investments
An Introduction
Dr. Maximilian Horster – Partner, South Pole Group
South Pole Group · June 2015 Page 18

19. About South Pole Group
South Pole Group · June 2015
We measure and reduce environmental
and social impact for 1’000+ clients.
We enable our customers to create value
from sustainability-related activities.
Our staff of 130 employees in 17 offices
worldwide are passionate to fight climate
change.
Page 19

20. Financial industry reference
South Pole Group · June 2015 Page 20

21. A movement driven by asset owners…
South Pole Group · June 2015 Page 21
Global Investor
Statement on Climate
Change of 350 investors
Portfolio Decarbonization
Coalition is formed, with
now 10 members
Montreal Pledge is
announced. Over 50
signatories (USD 2.9tn)
Mandatory investments
footprinting in France
Low Carbon Investment Registry
reports USD 24bn of emission
reducing investments by 45 investors

22. It’s a journey…
South Pole Group · June 2015 Page 22

23. Comparison IIGCC Example Portfolio vs Benchmark
South Pole Group · June 2015 Page 23
USD 1bn invested into
the IIGCC Example
Portfolio and the
Benchmark.
%
IIGCC
Example
Portfolio
%
IIGCC
Benchmark
Difference
237,426 212,282 -25,144
739,108 619,084 -120,024
436,074 365,260 -70,814
0.32% 3,181,503 0.28% 2,844,574
85% 64% 21%
237 212 11%
340 264 22%
173 152 12%
Emissions (tCO2e) per USD Millions of Revenue
Weighted Emission / Weighted Sales
Total Emissions Scope 1&2 (tCO2e)
Total Emissions Scope 1,2 & 3 (tCO2e)
Total Emissions Scope 1,2 & 3 (tCO2e) Minus
Double Counting
Total Offsetting Cost (USD)
Percentage of Disclosing Companies
Emissions (tCO2e) per USD 1 Million Invested
Index tCO2e per USD 1m invested
SMI Index 160
IIGCC Benchmark 212
IIGCC Portfolio 237
MSCI UK All Cap 240
S&P 500 270
OSEBX 300
MSCI Europe 320
Stoxx 50 570
Dax 750

24. Comparing Apples with Apples
South Pole Group · June 2015 Page 24
Investment
Carbon Intensity
(per $ invested)
Revenue
Carbon Intensity
(per $ revenue)
Investment
Carbon Footprint
(tCO2)
Currency
Exchange rate
Portfolio Composition
Market Cap
Revenue
GHG data
Scope
Approximations
U
N
I
T
D
A
T
E
G
H
G
Ceteris Paribus

25. Forward-looking vs. Snapshot
South Pole Group · June 2015 Page 25

26. Widening & Deepening
South Pole Group · June 2015 Page 26

27. Strategies to act
Engage
Engage on Transparency and Performance
Communicate
Report your climate exposure/ impact to stakeholders
Price externalities
Apply environmental cost, offset GHG emissions
Measure & set targets
Set reduction targets for yourself & asset managers
Divest
Avoid fossil fuel exposure
Hedge
Focus on winners of low carbon economy
South Pole Group · June 2015 Page 27

28. Thank you
South Pole Group · June 2015 Page 28
Maximilian Horster
M.Horster@southpolecarbon.com

29. © 2015 MSCI Inc. All rights reserved.
Please refer to the disclaimer at the end of this document.
UNDERSTANDING AND
MANAGING CARBON RISK IN
INSTITUTIONAL PORTFOLIOS
IIGCC Event
June 2015

30. Paris
London
Frankfurt
Geneva
Beijing
Hong Kong
Manila
SydneyCape Town
Mumbai
San Francisco
Boston
New York
Rockville
Monterrey
Toronto Portland
Tokyo
MSCI’S GLOBAL ESG TEAM
• Global staff of over 200 dedicated full time to ESG business, including 120+ ESG research analysts
• Over 800 clients with more than $15 trillion in assets globally
• Over 40 years experience in ESG (IRRC, KLD, Innovest, GMI Ratings)

31. CARBON FOOTPRINT KEY METRICS USED IN THE REQUEST
FOR FEEDBACK
Description
Portfolio Carbon
Emissions
(tons of CO2e)
Use case
Portfolio Carbon
Emissions per dollar
of investment
(tons CO2e / $ million
invested)
Sum of the
emissions for all the
positions in the
portfolio based on
the investor’s
ownership share per
million dollar
invested
Sum of the
emissions for all the
positions in the
portfolio based on
the investor’s
ownership share (i.e.
market cap)
• Report on emissions
(Montreal Pledge)
• Set reduction targets
Portfolio Carbon
Intensity
(tons CO2e / $
million sales)
Portfolio Carbon Risk
Exposure
(tons CO2e / $)
Weighted average
of the issuers’
carbon intensity in a
portfolio
Ratio of portfolio
carbon emissions
normalized by the
investor’s claims on
sales
1 2 3 4
Financed Carbon
Emissions
(tons CO2e )
Sum of the
emissions for all the
positions in the
portfolio using
enterprise value to
attribute investor’s
share of emissions
5
• Report on emissions
(Montreal Pledge)
• Set reduction targets
• Compare to
benchmark and
between portfolios
• Report on
normalized emissions
• Compare to
benchmark and
between portfolios
• Tool to measure
carbon risks
• Report on emissions
for non-equity and
multi asset class
portfolios

32. REQUEST FOR FEEDBACK: KEY FINDINGS
32
• Consultees split as to the best way to measure the
carbon footprint
No consensus on
which metric is the
Carbon Footprint
• Broad consensus that presenting multiple metrics for
emissions and intensity is useful because different use
cases may warrant different measurements
Presenting Multiple
Metrics Makes Sense
• Being able to explain the metric is important, as is the
ability to use one metric for all portfolios (i.e. ideally
not one for equity and another for Fixed Income/Multi-
Asset Class)
Simplicity is Key
• Equity portfolios are currently the focus but there is
broad interest in expanding to Fixed Income, albeit
with an acknowledgement that FI is more challenging
Incorporating Fixed
Income is on the
Horizon
• Several consultees made a point of saying that any
footprint measure is only as good as the underlying
carbon emissions data.
Data Quality is Key
• Measuring footprint is useful but is limited in what it
can tell you about a portfolio’s exposure to carbon
risks.
Carbon Portfolio
Analysis should go
beyond Footprint
30%
70%
By Client type
AO
AM
12%
70%
18%
By region
APAC
EMEA
North
America

33. Key Statistics
Carbon Emissions
/$M Invested
Carbon
Emissions*
Carbon
Intensity
Portfolio
Carbon Risk
exposure
IIGCC Portfolio 238 238,482 338 220
MSCI ACWI 192 191,909 241 219
MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target 57 56,864 78 92
T CO2e / $M T CO2e T CO2e / $M sales
Based on investment of $1bn
What is my portfolio’s
exposure to carbon intensive
companies relative to my
benchmark?
What carbon emissions are
my investments
responsible for?
The sample portfolio is 40% more
carbon intensive than the
standard benchmark and 335%
more carbon intensive than the
low carbon benchmark
Sample portfolio provided by the IIGCC
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Carbon
Emissions/$1M
Invested
Carbon Intensity Weighted
Average Carbon
Intensity
Portfolio
Benchmark
ACWI LC Target
CARBON FOOTPRINTING &
COMPARISON TO A BENCHMARK

34. How does security selection within each
sector affect my carbon risk exposure?
What sectors are driving my carbon
risk exposure?
Sample portfolio provided by the IIGCC
CARBON FOOTPRINTING &
ATTRIBUTION ANALYSIS

35. FORWARD-LOOKING ASSESSMENT: LARGEST CONTRIBUTORS
TO EMISSIONS ASSESSED ON CARBON RISK MANAGEMENT
PRACTICES
Lafarge contributed 12% to portfolio emissions
but demonstrated strong commitment to carbon
risk management, with aggressive reduction
targets
Canadian Oil Sands is among the largest
contributors and is considered a laggard in its
industry in terms of carbon risk management
 Engagement opportunity?
*as of 31 October 2014. Past performance is not indicative of future returns or performance.

36. EXPOSURE TO STRANDED ASSETS: 7% OF THE SAMPLE
PORTFOLIO EXPOSED TO COAL & UNCONVENTIONAL RESERVES,
CONTRIBUTED 75% TO THE PORTFOLIO’S POTENTIAL EMISSIONS
*as of 31 October 2014. Past performance is not indicative of future returns or performance.

37. CLEAN TECH SOLUTIONS: 8% OF THE PORTFOLIO OFFERS CLEAN
TECH SOLUTIONS BUT ONLY 2% ARE “PURE PLAY”
2% 0%
6%
92%
Portfolio Weight Grouped by Revenue
Generated from Clean Technology Solutions
>50% - 100% of Revenue >20% - 50% of Revenue
>0% - 20% of Revenue No Revenue
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
Any
Strategy
Alternative
Energy
Energy
Efficiency
Sustainable
Water
Pollution
Prevention
Green
Building
Weight
Weight of Companies Offering Clean Technology Solutions
IIGCC Portfolio MSCI ACWI MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target
*as of 31 October 2014. Past performance is not indicative of future returns or performance.

38. For more than 40 years, MSCI’s research-based indexes and analytics have helped the world’s
leading investors build and manage better portfolios. Clients rely on our offerings for deeper
insights into the drivers of performance and risk in their portfolios, broad asset class coverage
and innovative research.
Our line of products and services includes indexes, analytical models, data, real estate
benchmarks and ESG research.
MSCI serves 98 of the top 100 largest money managers, according to the most recent P&I
ranking.
For more information, visit us at www.msci.com.
ABOUT MSCI
38

39. AMERICAS
Americas 1 888 588 4567 *
Atlanta + 1 404 551 3212
Boston + 1 617 532 0920
Chicago + 1 312 675 0545
Monterrey + 52 81 1253 4020
New York + 1 212 804 3901
San Francisco + 1 415 836 8800
Sao Paulo + 55 11 3706 1360
Toronto + 1 416 628 1007
* = toll free
msci.com
clientservice@msci.com
CONTACT US
39
EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST
& AFRICA
Cape Town + 27 21 673 0100
Frankfurt + 49 69 133 859 00
Geneva + 41 22 817 9777
London + 44 20 7618 2222
Milan + 39 02 5849 0415
Paris 0800 91 59 17 *
ASIA PACIFIC
China North 10800 852 1032 *
China South 10800 152 1032 *
Hong Kong + 852 2844 9333
Mumbai + 91 22 6784 9160
Seoul 00798 8521 3392 *
Singapore 800 852 3749 *
Sydney + 61 2 9033 9333
Taipei 008 0112 7513 *
Tokyo 81 3 5290 1555

40. This document and all of the information contained in it, including without limitation all text, data, graphs, charts (collectively, the “Information”) is the property of MSCI Inc. or its subsidiaries (collectively, “MSCI”), or MSCI’s licensors, direct or indirect
suppliers or any third party involved in making or compiling any Information (collectively, with MSCI, the “Information Providers”) and is provided for informational purposes only. The Information may not be modified, reverse-engineered, reproduced
or redisseminated in whole or in part without prior written permission from MSCI.
The Information may not be used to create derivative works or to verify or correct other data or information. For example (but without limitation), the Information may not be used to create indexes, databases, risk models, analytics, software, or in
connection with the issuing, offering, sponsoring, managing or marketing of any securities, portfolios, financial products or other investment vehicles utilizing or based on, linked to, tracking or otherwise derived from the Information or any other MSCI
data, information, products or services.
The user of the Information assumes the entire risk of any use it may make or permit to be made of the Information. NONE OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDERS MAKES ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS WITH RESPECT TO
THE INFORMATION (OR THE RESULTS TO BE OBTAINED BY THE USE THEREOF), AND TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, EACH INFORMATION PROVIDER EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES (INCLUDING, WITHOUT
LIMITATION, ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF ORIGINALITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, NON-INFRINGEMENT, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE) WITH RESPECT TO ANY OF THE INFORMATION.
Without limiting any of the foregoing and to the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, in no event shall any Information Provider have any liability regarding any of the Information for any direct, indirect, special, punitive, consequential
(including lost profits) or any other damages even if notified of the possibility of such damages. The foregoing shall not exclude or limit any liability that may not by applicable law be excluded or limited, including without limitation (as applicable), any
liability for death or personal injury to the extent that such injury results from the negligence or willful default of itself, its servants, agents or sub-contractors.
Information containing any historical information, data or analysis should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of any future performance, analysis, forecast or prediction. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
The Information should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. All Information is impersonal
and not tailored to the needs of any person, entity or group of persons.
None of the Information constitutes an offer to sell (or a solicitation of an offer to buy), any security, financial product or other investment vehicle or any trading strategy.
It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Exposure to an asset class or trading strategy or other category represented by an index is only available through third party investable instruments (if any) based on that index. MSCI does not issue,
sponsor, endorse, market, offer, review or otherwise express any opinion regarding any fund, ETF, derivative or other security, investment, financial product or trading strategy that is based on, linked to or seeks to provide an investment return related
to the performance of any MSCI index (collectively, “Index Linked Investments”). MSCI makes no assurance that any Index Linked Investments will accurately track index performance or provide positive investment returns. MSCI Inc. is not an
investment adviser or fiduciary and MSCI makes no representation regarding the advisability of investing in any Index Linked Investments.
Index returns do not represent the results of actual trading of investible assets/securities. MSCI maintains and calculates indexes, but does not manage actual assets. Index returns do not reflect payment of any sales charges or fees an investor may pay
to purchase the securities underlying the index or Index Linked Investments. The imposition of these fees and charges would cause the performance of an Index Linked Investment to be different than the MSCI index performance.
The Information may contain back tested data. Back-tested performance is not actual performance, but is hypothetical. There are frequently material differences between back tested performance results and actual results subsequently achieved by
any investment strategy.
Constituents of MSCI equity indexes are listed companies, which are included in or excluded from the indexes according to the application of the relevant index methodologies. Accordingly, constituents in MSCI equity indexes may include MSCI Inc.,
clients of MSCI or suppliers to MSCI. Inclusion of a security within an MSCI index is not a recommendation by MSCI to buy, sell, or hold such security, nor is it considered to be investment advice.
Data and information produced by various affiliates of MSCI Inc., including MSCI ESG Research Inc. and Barra LLC, may be used in calculating certain MSCI indexes. More information can be found in the relevant index methodologies on www.msci.com.
MSCI receives compensation in connection with licensing its indexes to third parties. MSCI Inc.’s revenue includes fees based on assets in Index Linked Investments. Information can be found in MSCI Inc.’s company filings on the Investor Relations
section of www.msci.com.
MSCI ESG Research Inc. is a Registered Investment Adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and a subsidiary of MSCI Inc. Except with respect to any applicable products or services from MSCI ESG Research, neither MSCI nor any of its
products or services recommends, endorses, approves or otherwise expresses any opinion regarding any issuer, securities, financial products or instruments or trading strategies and MSCI’s products or services are not intended to constitute investment
advice or a recommendation to make (or refrain from making) any kind of investment decision and may not be relied on as such. Issuers mentioned or included in any MSCI ESG Research materials may include MSCI Inc., clients of MSCI or suppliers to
MSCI, and may also purchase research or other products or services from MSCI ESG Research. MSCI ESG Research materials, including materials utilized in any MSCI ESG Indexes or other products, have not been submitted to, nor received approval
from, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission or any other regulatory body.
Any use of or access to products, services or information of MSCI requires a license from MSCI. MSCI, Barra, RiskMetrics, IPD, FEA, InvestorForce, and other MSCI brands and product names are the trademarks, service marks, or registered trademarks
of MSCI or its subsidiaries in the United States and other jurisdictions. The Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) was developed by and is the exclusive property of MSCI and Standard & Poor’s. “Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS)” is a
service mark of MSCI and Standard & Poor’s.
NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER
40

41. May 2015
Trucost presentation for
IIGCC Stockholm
Lauren Smart,
Executive Director
Carbon Audits: How, what, why?

42. IIGCC PORTFOLIO

43. BLACK SPOTS

44. ISSUE DEEP DIVES: FOSSIL FUELS &
RENEWABLES - SECTOR SPECIFC KPI’S
Part of the “problem”
or part of the solution?
Am I interested in
positive impact or
risk…or both?
9 companies have exposure to coal (either mining or energy production)
But…. 4 of those provide exposure to renewables
6 companies provide exposure to clean energy…. 5 of those also have exposure to fossil fuels

45. SUPPORTING TRANSITION TO A LOW
CARBON ECONOMY? RISK? TREND?
Transition Metrics Risk MetricsImpact Metrics
Different metrics to answer different questions..
• Proportion of activities in “green” vs “brown” and change over time
• Fossil fuel reserves 1P & 2P (tonnes of coal, barrels of oil, bcf)
• Embedded Carbon in reserves (tonnes of carbon)
• Carbon regulation, costs & pass through
0
50
100
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Alliant
Coal Power Generation Renewables
0
50
100
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
American Electric
Coal Power Generation Renewables
0
20
40
60
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
PPL Corp
Coal Power Generation Renewables

46. AUTOS – SECTOR SPECIFIC KPI’S
Company disclosure Model breakdown DEFRA "Real World"
Manufacturing phase 3,705,296 3,705,296 3,705,296 3,705,296
Total vehicle use emissions
tCO2 46,696,786 44,409,580 67,309,428 58,842,694
Emissions per car,
manufacturing and usage 26 25 36 32
Total 2013 fleet emissions of BMW
Company calculation
In use phase emissions reported (tCO2) 46696786
Scope of fleet covered 83%
Source CDP
Quality assessment
Uses regional
emissions
Data source Grade
Data reported by the company using relevant methodology and covering
all passenger and LCV operations
GRADE 1
Data reported by the company using relevant methodology and scaled
up from initial scope GRADE 2
Estimates from model/regional breakdown with emission factors
provided by the company GRADE 3
Estimates from model breakdown from general averages
GRADE 4
Hierarchy of information
Am I interested in positive impact
or risk…or both?

47. BANKS – FINANCED EMISSIONS

48. QUANTIFYING THE POSITIVES!
Project 1: Solar Power Station
A utility scale solar PV power
plant.
Project 2: Wind Farm
Largest single stage wind
farm in the southern
hemisphere.
Your Investments
Projects 3,4,5
Carbon Savings:
X tonnes pa
Carbon Savings:
700,000 tonnes pa
Project 3,4,5 etc...
xxxx
Per project
carbon savings
Carbon savings
attributed to your
investment
Carbon savings
attributed to
your portfolio
Carbon Savings:
X tonnes pa
Carbon Savings:
X tonnes per $mn
Carbon Savings:
X tonnes per $mn
Carbon Savings:
X tonnes per $mn
Climate Investments Portfolios save x tonnes carbon per $mn invested
x tonnes
per $mn
invested
AMBITION: BALANCE PORTFOLIO FOOTPRINT
Carbon Footprint
• Listed equities
• Corporate fixed income
Carbon Savings
• Green bonds
• Green real estate
• Green infrastructure

49. AN EVIDENCE BASE FROM WHICH TO
DEVELOP A STRATEGY
MEASURE
Divest
Hedge
Engage
Monitor
Manage
New
Products
Invest in companies &
assets best positioned
for a low carbon
economy
Quantify the benefits
>3x Capex spent by
world’s largest fossil
companies on
exploration than
dividends
e.g. Identify
Companies with coal
activities, proportion &
change over time
Embed environmental
considerations in your
investment strategy
Create new investment
products with reduced
carbon exposure
Strategic Asset Allocation
Green Bonds, Infrastructure
etc.
Undertake a carbon audit
of portfolio constituents to
understand your exposure
Address other
environmental issues
Address impacts in other
asset classes
COMMUNICATION

50. Lauren Smart
Executive Director
Trucost Plc, 22 Chancery Lane
London UK
Tel: +44 20 7160 9814
E-Mail: lauren.smart@trucost.com
QUESTIONS?QUESTIONS?

51. THE MONTREAL
CARBON PLEDGE
Investor workshop on carbon footprinting, 17th June 2015
Yulia Sofronova, Networks & Global Outreach Manager, PRI
Sagarika Chatterjee, Associate Director, PRI

52. A CALL TO ACTION
1. Sign the Montréal Carbon Pledge
2. Ensure lobbying activities within your spheres of influence are at least neutral, if not supportive, of
strong climate action
3. Ask your CEO to meet your local finance minister to explain the risks to the global economy if we do not
get an ambitious agreement in Paris
“Investors have a sacred and legal fiduciary duty to engage with this issue. We have 15 months to put a
regulatory framework in place to guide us over the next 50 years. If we do not do this in Paris, it will take
another 10 years to rally the political will to come to another agreement. By 2025, it will be too late to keep
us under 2 degrees and it will be incredibly expensive.”
Christiana Figueres, Executive Secretary of the UNFCCC, PRI in Person 2014

53. THE PRI’S 2015 ACTIVITIES TOWARDS COP21
Measure:
 Montréal Carbon Pledge
Engage:
 Investor Working Group on Corporate Climate Lobbying, water risk engagement
 G7 finance ministers urged to support strong global agreement
Reduce emissions:
 PRI Asset Owner Climate Change Strategy Project
 Portfolio Decarbonization Coalition
Events and peer-peer exchange:
 PRI in Person: 8 September in London
 Caring for Climate Business Forum: 7-9 December during COP21
PRI is focusing on enabling investors to:

54. MONTRÉAL CARBON PLEDGE
Consistent with the Portfolio Decarbonization Coalition’s disclosure target
 Announced at PRI in Person in September 2014
 For investors to measure and disclose the carbon
footprint of their portfolio on an annual basis
 Can apply to part or all of the portfolio
 Targeting 100 signatories and US$3 trillion of total
portfolio commitments ahead of the UNFCCC
meeting in Paris in December 2015
 Sign-up by 30th September, carbon footprint and
disclosure by 1st December 2015.
 Open to all investors to endorse at
www.montrealpledge.org
 How-To guide and case studies available
 Carbon data can be used to inform corporate
engagement strategies, integrated into investment
decisions and/or set carbon reduction targets

55. MONTRÉAL CARBON PLEDGE
50 signatories from the USA, Canada, Europe, Japan and Australia including:
 Etablissement du Régime Additionnel
de la Fonction Publique (ERAFP)
 PGGM Investments
 Bâtirente
 The Joseph Rowntree Charitable
Trust
 Environment Agency Pension Fund
 CalPERS
 AP4
 Nordea
 Calvert Investments
 Ownership Capital
 AP4
 Fonds de Réserve pour les Retraites
(FRR)
 Mirova
 Alliance Trust
 Folksam
 HESTA
 The Building Owners and
Managers Association of Canada
(BOMA Canada)
 The Co-operators Group Limited
 University of California
 PFZW
 Catholic Super
 Swedbank Robur Fonder AB
 Local Government Super
 Secom Pension Fund
 VicSuper
 BNP Paribas Investment Partners
 Caisse des Depots
 Stichting Pensioenfonds ABP

56. MONTRÉAL CARBON PLEDGE
 yourSRI.com
 South Pole Carbon
 Trucost
 Bloomberg
 MSCI ESG Research
 EIRIS
 ET Index
 INRATE
 Solactive CK Low Carbon Index Family
 Solactive CK Low Carbon Europe
 Solactive CK Low Carbon Canada
 Solactive CK Low Carbon US
 FTSE Developed ex Fossil Fuels Index Series
 S&P US Carbon Efficient Index
 S&P/IFC Carbon Efficient Index
 FTSE All Share Carbon Index
 MSCI Global Low Carbon Indexes
 MSCI Global Fossil Fuels Exclusion Indexes
 ET Low-Carbon Index Series
Service providers Low carbon investment indices

57. PRI Asset Owner Climate Change Strategy Project:
 Focuses on whether and how to set an emissions reduction goal
 Aims to assist asset owners in preparing for a transition to a low carbon economy
 Public report with recommendations and pilot framework in November 2015
The Portfolio Decarbonization Coalition:
 Encourages investors to measure and disclose carbon footprint – targeting US$500 billion in AUM
 Assembling an investor coalition that will in aggregate decarbonise US$100 billion in AUM
 Co-founded by AP4, Amundi Asset Management, UNEP FI and the Carbon Disclosure Project
WHAT FURTHER STEPS CAN INVESTORS TAKE?

58. Investor interest in:
 Coal divestment implications
 Low carbon investment opportunities
 Engagement: stranded assets, shareholder resolutions
 Regulation: France, California
Examples:
 Europe: AXA Group, BNP Paribas, Environment Agency Pension Fund and PFZW
 USA: CalPERS, University of California
 Australia: Local Government Super
GLOBAL TRENDS IN INVESTOR ACTION ON
CLIMATE CHANGE

59. RESOURCES
 How-To: Five steps to measure your portfolio’s carbon footprint: http://montrealpledge.org/how-to/the-five-
steps/
 Case studies: http://montrealpledge.org/how-to/case-studies/
 Engagement: http://www.unpri.org/areas-of-work/clearinghouse/coordinated-collaborative-engagements/
 PRI in Person 2015: http://www.unpri.org/events/pri-in-person-2015/
 Portfolio Decarbonization Coalition: http://unepfi.org/pdc/

60. Key questions for discussion
 What has been your experience of carbon footprinting?
 What are the key issues to address/key internal processes to
complete before embarking on this exercise?
 What are the main challenges/what are the main benefits of
footprinting?
 Should footprinting be extended to other asset classes?
 Towards a global standard for measuring carbon footprint?
 How could results be used?
 Objective setting
 Investment decisions and/or engagement with companies
 Selection and/or engagement with asset managers
 Reporting to beneficiaries
60

61. Contact:
Stephanie Pfeifer
Chief Executive
Email: spfeifer@iigcc.org
Or
Morgan LaManna
Project Manager
Email: mlamanna@iigcc.org
www.iigcc.org
Contact