This document provides an overview and analysis of compliance with Republic Act 9003 (Ecological Solid Waste Management Act of 2000) in Barangay Central Signal Village Zones 3&5 in Taguig City, Philippines. It begins with background information on RA 9003 and a profile of the barangay. It then describes the objectives, procedures, tools, and survey used to assess compliance. Key findings include that residents are aware of waste policies but bins are lacking, and waterways remain dirty despite cleanups. Recommendations include joining community cleanups, adding more bins, and intensifying penalties for violations.
GIÁO ÁN DẠY THÊM (KẾ HOẠCH BÀI BUỔI 2) - TIẾNG ANH 8 GLOBAL SUCCESS (2 CỘT) N...
Case study report
1. The Status of Brgy.
Central Signal
Village, Zones 3&5
as to R.A. 9003
Compliance*
*scope is under conditions
A Report By
Michael N. Evans
MA-LLI
An Action Paper in Education for Sustainable
Development
2. • a highly urbanized barangay in Taguig
City
• part of 13 barangays in District 2, 15 in
D1
• population had 35, 752 residents as of
May 1, 2010 (http://www.nscb.gov.ph/)
Brgy. Central Signal Village
Profile
3. Topic Backgound
What is R.A. 9003?
• An act providing for an ecological solid
waste management program, creating the
necessary institutional mechanisms and
incentives, declaring certain acts
prohibited and providing penalties,
appropriating funds therefore, and for
other purposes.
Source: http://www.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2001/ra_9003_2001.html#top
4. Topic Backgound
What is it known for?
• Section 1. Short Title - This Act
shall be known as the "Ecological
Solid Waste Management Act of
2000."
Source: http://www.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2001/ra_9003_2001.html#top
5. Topic Backgound
What is it all about?
• Ecological solid waste management shall
refer to the systematic administration of
activities which provide for segregation at
source, segregated transportation,
storage, transfer, processing, treatment,
and disposal of solid waste and all other
waste management activities which do not
harm the environment;
Source: http://www.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2001/ra_9003_2001.html#top
6. Topic Backgound
What is it all about?
• Segregation shall refer to a solid waste
management practice of separating
different materials found in solid waste in
order to promote recycling and re-use of
resources and to reduce the volume of
waste for collection and disposal;
Source: http://www.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2001/ra_9003_2001.html#top
7. Topic Backgound
What is it all about?
• Segregation at source shall refer to a solid
waste management practice of separating,
at the point of origin, different materials
found in solid waste in order to promote
recycling and re-use of resources and to
reduce the volume of waste for collection
and disposal;
Source: http://www.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2001/ra_9003_2001.html#top
8. Topic Backgound
What is it all about?
• Solid waste shall refer to all discarded
household, commercial waste, non-
hazardous institutional and industrial
waste, street sweepings, construction
debris, agricultural waste, and other non-
hazardous/non-toxic solid waste.
Source: http://www.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2001/ra_9003_2001.html#top
9. Topic Backgound
What is it all about?
• Solid waste management shall refer to the
discipline associated with the control of
generation, storage, collection, transfer
and transport, processing, and disposal of
solid wastes [that is in line] with the best
principles of public health, conservation…
and other environmental considerations…
that is also responsive to public attitudes;
Source: http://www.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2001/ra_9003_2001.html#top
10. Objectives
• Collect data exhaustively to
maximize accuracy of resources
• Gauge the performance of
barangay in carrying out the
program by using the selected
tool
• Stress out the strengths of
barangay in imposing the act
• Address the pitfalls of barangay
implementation through sound
recommendation
11. Procedure
OrientationOrientation
Project SelectionProject Selection
Request Letter
Construction
Request Letter
Construction
Initial Data
Collection
(Interview with the
Brgy. Councilor
Initial Data
Collection
(Interview with the
Brgy. Councilor
Survey
Dissemination
Survey
Dissemination
Final Collection of
Data
Final Collection of
Data Data EvaluationData Evaluation
Report
Formulation
Report
Formulation
PresentationPresentation
16. Survey Contents
• Profile
• Letter
Dear Respondent,
Good day!
I am a student of Rizal Technological University taking up the subject,
Education for Sustainable Development. The subject requires me to
conduct a case study on any eco-related projects either in school or
local government. I understand that Barangay Central Signal Village is
implementing a Solid Waste Management Project. In this regard, I
humbly ask your opinion about such program. Rest assured that your
response will be treated with utmost confidentiality.
Sincerely,
MICHAEL N. EVANS
17. Survey
Contents
• Profile
• Letter
• Itemized
Questionnaire
Survey Item
Scale
Not
Really
Slight
Very
Much
1. How aware are you of the Solid
Waste Management Project of your
barangay? (If VERY MUCH, please
answer PART 2, ITEM 1)
1 2 3
1. How aware are you on garbage
collection schedule?
1 2 3
1. Are you aware of proper
segregation?
1 2 3
1. Are you aware of the NO
SEGREGATION, NO COLLECTION
policy of the barangay?
1 2 3
1. Are you satisfied with the
performance of barangay personnel
in implementing NO SEGREGATION,
NO COLLECTION policy?
1 2 3
1. Are people from barangay doing
their job in terms of proper waste
disposal?
1 2 3
1. Are you aware of the consequences
of not doing proper segregation of
waste?
1 2 3
21. Survey Result: Open-Ended
Questions
• Most of the residents in Zone 5
responded positively with 7-1-2 mark
for positive, negative, and slight
responses respectively.
• The people believed that there is
discipline among neighbors when it
comes to cleanliness of area.
22. Survey Result: Open-Ended
Questions
• Majority or 6/10 respondents from
Zone 3 answered positively, while 4
answered slight. No negative
response was registered.
• People mostly recognized the efforts
of local leaders especially in
collecting garbage.
29. Findings • Survey-wise, people
favorably responded as
to evaluating
cleanliness of their area
both in Zones 3 and 5.
The former credited the
residents themselves
while the latter
considered the local
officials in maintaining
cleanliness in each
area.
30. Findings • The No Segregation,
No Collection Policy is
almost fully
implemented.
• Some residents still do
not practice
segregation as they
find it time-consuming.
• The local officials are
keen on adapting the
memoranda.
31. Findings • Despite the occasional
clean up drives,
waterways like creeks
and canals are still in
worse condition.
• Majority of the people are
aware of the garbage
collection schedules.
• The local government is
supportive to the projects
of concerned office.
32. Recommendations •Join the community in
clean up drives or other
similar matters.
•Open access to public
trash bins (follows
segregation) in key
locations.
•Intensify penalty
imposition.
•Navigate a website meant
for public reports of actual
videos of violations.