The document provides guidance on building budgets for NIH grant applications. It discusses getting started with budget preparation, types of budgets including modular and itemized budgets, budget components such as personnel, equipment, travel, and indirect costs. Tips are provided for each budget section including calculating effort for personnel and justifying large expenses. The document emphasizes planning ahead and building a budget that reflects the real needs and costs of the proposed research.
Dollars and Rands: Budget Planning Pre- and Post-awardHopkinsCFAR
This document provides guidelines for young and emerging researchers applying for NIH and MRC grants. It discusses the main types of NIH grant funding, including R01, R03 and R21 grants. It emphasizes that reviewers evaluate the scientific merit and budget separately. The budget structure, common expenses, and exchange rate considerations for international applicants are also outlined. Closeout procedures like submitting final reports are described. Tips include using a conservative exchange rate and budgeting approach for international grants.
2
JUS-515 Topic 8 – Budget Detail Planner Worksheet
Directions:
Review the BJA Grant Writing and Management Academy Budget Development document by clicking on the link below.
https://www.bja.gov/gwma/module5/transcript.html#part2
Create a budget for your grant using the following planning worksheet.
Budget Categories: Insert additional rows as needed.
Personnel
Personnel Title/Position
Brief Job Description
Salary
% of time: full-time, half-time, etc.
Fringe Benefits
1.
2.
3.
4.
Total Personnel Expenditures
$
Travel: List each position that will involve travel while on the job. Estimate travel (mileage) to and from a site within the targeted area during work hours. Find the per diem rate for your state or jurisdiction.
Personnel Title/Position
Amount of time per month
Estimated cost
1.
2.
3.
Total Travel Expenditures
$
Equipment: (e.g., computers)
Equipment ($5,000.00 or more total cost)
Purpose
Estimated cost
1.
2.
3.
Total Equipment Expenditures
$
Supplies: (e.g., copy paper, pens, pencils, anything that the program will need to effectively function)
Supplies (Less than $5,000.00)
Purpose
Estimated cost
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Total Supplies Expenditures
$
Evaluation/Consultants & Contracts:
Outside Evaluator’s (Estimate a consultant’s cost in your area, including their travel to your site, and/or other expenses for evaluation only.)
Purpose
Estimated cost
1.
2.
3.
Total Evaluation Expenditures
$
In-Kind (e.g., space, volunteers, equipment, supplies)
In-kind donations/value savings (Do not include in your final total grant proposal request)
Purpose
Estimated cost savings
1.
2.
3.
Total In-kind
$
Total Cost of Proposed Grant: $___________________
(All categories including In-Kind. Your overall budget may exceed the $100,000 cap.)
Total In-Kind Savings (minus): - $___________________
Total Grant Proposal Request: $_100,000_____________
2
JUS-515 Topic 8 Budget Narrative
Review the Bureau of Justice Assistance Grant Writing and Management Academy website. Click on Budget and listen to the presentation on Budget Development, Budget/Detail Categories and Budget Narrative. You may want to click on the video transcript to read a copy.
Video: https://www.bja.gov/gwma/module5/index.html
Video Transcript: https://www.bja.gov/gwma/module5/index.html
Create a Budget Narrative of 1,500-2,000 words. The Budget Narrative must include a detailed description of the following:
1. Each Personnel position’s duties and responsibilities.
2. Travel required to trainings, conferences, or job related.
3. Equipment that will support the proposed activities.
4. Supplies that support the proposed activities.
5. Describe the process for choosing an evaluator/consultant.
a. What criteria should the evaluator/consultant meet?
b. What are the evaluator’s credentials as a reputable evaluator?
6. Identify and estimate the value of your In-kind donations from the agency and other stakehold ...
This document provides guidance on writing effective grant and dissertation proposals. It discusses key elements to include such as an abstract, research design, methodology, significance, staffing needs, time frame, budget, letters of endorsement, and dissemination of results. The main points are:
1) An abstract should summarize the proposed work in an clear, economical way for reviewers.
2) A proposal should include the research purpose and goals, design, methods, significance, and time frame. It should demonstrate organizational skills and that necessary resources and support are secured.
3) Explaining how the study benefits others and contributes new knowledge can strengthen the case for funding.
4) Including a realistic budget, clear
coordinate better to learn PPT IT DEPT-Tier II SAR.pptxbmit1
The document provides guidelines for submitting a Self Assessment Report (SAR) for undergraduate engineering programs seeking accreditation from the National Board of Accreditation. It outlines the format and content required in the SAR, including:
1. Institutional and program information in Part A.
2. Program-specific criteria in Part B, including vision, mission, outcomes, curriculum, teaching-learning processes, course and program outcomes, student performance, faculty, facilities, and continuous improvement.
3. Criteria are assigned marks and the SAR requires correlation tables to map courses and outcomes, in addition to reporting attainment levels for course and program outcomes.
The document provides an overview and agenda for a project leaders training course on grants management. It discusses the goals of developing grants management knowledge and skills. The course objectives are to increase participants' understanding of compliance requirements, writing project statements and reports, communication, and grants management processes. An overview is given of the grants process including pre-award, award, post-award, and closeout stages while ensuring compliance.
The document summarizes a grant writers' workshop that covered the NIH application and scoring process. It discusses major changes to NIH scoring, applications, and the grants process. Workshop sections focused on analyzing request for proposals, preparing and submitting applications, determining allowable costs, and administering grants in compliance with uniform requirements.
This document provides guidance on best practices for managing externally funded sponsored research projects. It outlines key roles and responsibilities, including project initiation, budget monitoring, reporting requirements, and project closure. Effective project management is important to ensure funds are spent efficiently and funder expectations are met. Regular budget reviews and exception reporting help identify risks or variances. While unanticipated events may occur, open communication between all parties helps address issues and fulfill obligations.
Promoting Study Abroad Partnerships for Innovation and Collabo.docxamrit47
Promoting Study Abroad Partnerships for Innovation and Collaboration
Checklist
Section I: Funding Opportunity Description
1. Background – nothing
2. Program Summary
___ a. Goal - How will UHD encourage more of its students to study in Latin
American and more Latin American students to study at UHD?
___ i. Academic mobility – Leverage private-public partnership for cost-
effective means to increase participation
___ ii. Can UHD double the number of students studying abroad in the
Western Hemisphere? How?
___ b. Purpose – Increase bi-directional collaboration in the Western
Hemisphere
and increase study abroad. Proposed activities and topics
___ i. Smart collaboration
___ ii. Language barriers - Check out the English Language Institute,
which is located at S-417 in the One Main Building.
___ iii. Diversity and inclusion
___ iv. Alumni engagement
___ v. Communication and marketing
___ vi. Quality
___ vii. Accreditation
___ viii. Credit transfer
___ ix Service and service learning
___ x. Resource development
___ xi. Incoming student housing plans
___ xii. Safety and security
___ xiii. Address how UHD will leverage institutional commitment to
increasing study abroad - Can UHD be the gateway for the U of
H System for study abroad in the Western Hemisphere. UHD
students can take classes at the Central Campus.
___ xiv. Address inclusion and diversity in study abroad and access to
underserved/underrepresented populations
___ c. Expected Results
___ i. Demonstrate increased awareness of the barriers to study abroad
at UHD
___ ii. New model to engage students in the Western Hemisphere
___ iii. Increase number of effective partnerships between U.S. HEIs and
non U.S. HEIs
Section III: Eligibility Information
___ 1. Eligible Applicants – UHD is Legal and accredited
___ 2. Cost Sharing or Matching Fund Requirements
___ a. Commitment to increasing study abroad in both directions
___ b. Cost sharing and additional funding from private sector partners
Section IV: Application and Submission
___ 1. Online Submission Process – Must submit through Blackboard Learn
Assignments tool.
___ 2. Technical Application Format
___ a. Maximum 10 pages
___ b. Times New Roman
___ c. 12-point font
___ d. Single space
___ e. 8 ½ X 11-inch paper
___ f. 1-inch margins
___ g. Each page numbered consecutively, beginning after the cover page
___ h. Cover page, dividers, table of contents, annexes not counted toward 10 ...
Dollars and Rands: Budget Planning Pre- and Post-awardHopkinsCFAR
This document provides guidelines for young and emerging researchers applying for NIH and MRC grants. It discusses the main types of NIH grant funding, including R01, R03 and R21 grants. It emphasizes that reviewers evaluate the scientific merit and budget separately. The budget structure, common expenses, and exchange rate considerations for international applicants are also outlined. Closeout procedures like submitting final reports are described. Tips include using a conservative exchange rate and budgeting approach for international grants.
2
JUS-515 Topic 8 – Budget Detail Planner Worksheet
Directions:
Review the BJA Grant Writing and Management Academy Budget Development document by clicking on the link below.
https://www.bja.gov/gwma/module5/transcript.html#part2
Create a budget for your grant using the following planning worksheet.
Budget Categories: Insert additional rows as needed.
Personnel
Personnel Title/Position
Brief Job Description
Salary
% of time: full-time, half-time, etc.
Fringe Benefits
1.
2.
3.
4.
Total Personnel Expenditures
$
Travel: List each position that will involve travel while on the job. Estimate travel (mileage) to and from a site within the targeted area during work hours. Find the per diem rate for your state or jurisdiction.
Personnel Title/Position
Amount of time per month
Estimated cost
1.
2.
3.
Total Travel Expenditures
$
Equipment: (e.g., computers)
Equipment ($5,000.00 or more total cost)
Purpose
Estimated cost
1.
2.
3.
Total Equipment Expenditures
$
Supplies: (e.g., copy paper, pens, pencils, anything that the program will need to effectively function)
Supplies (Less than $5,000.00)
Purpose
Estimated cost
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Total Supplies Expenditures
$
Evaluation/Consultants & Contracts:
Outside Evaluator’s (Estimate a consultant’s cost in your area, including their travel to your site, and/or other expenses for evaluation only.)
Purpose
Estimated cost
1.
2.
3.
Total Evaluation Expenditures
$
In-Kind (e.g., space, volunteers, equipment, supplies)
In-kind donations/value savings (Do not include in your final total grant proposal request)
Purpose
Estimated cost savings
1.
2.
3.
Total In-kind
$
Total Cost of Proposed Grant: $___________________
(All categories including In-Kind. Your overall budget may exceed the $100,000 cap.)
Total In-Kind Savings (minus): - $___________________
Total Grant Proposal Request: $_100,000_____________
2
JUS-515 Topic 8 Budget Narrative
Review the Bureau of Justice Assistance Grant Writing and Management Academy website. Click on Budget and listen to the presentation on Budget Development, Budget/Detail Categories and Budget Narrative. You may want to click on the video transcript to read a copy.
Video: https://www.bja.gov/gwma/module5/index.html
Video Transcript: https://www.bja.gov/gwma/module5/index.html
Create a Budget Narrative of 1,500-2,000 words. The Budget Narrative must include a detailed description of the following:
1. Each Personnel position’s duties and responsibilities.
2. Travel required to trainings, conferences, or job related.
3. Equipment that will support the proposed activities.
4. Supplies that support the proposed activities.
5. Describe the process for choosing an evaluator/consultant.
a. What criteria should the evaluator/consultant meet?
b. What are the evaluator’s credentials as a reputable evaluator?
6. Identify and estimate the value of your In-kind donations from the agency and other stakehold ...
This document provides guidance on writing effective grant and dissertation proposals. It discusses key elements to include such as an abstract, research design, methodology, significance, staffing needs, time frame, budget, letters of endorsement, and dissemination of results. The main points are:
1) An abstract should summarize the proposed work in an clear, economical way for reviewers.
2) A proposal should include the research purpose and goals, design, methods, significance, and time frame. It should demonstrate organizational skills and that necessary resources and support are secured.
3) Explaining how the study benefits others and contributes new knowledge can strengthen the case for funding.
4) Including a realistic budget, clear
coordinate better to learn PPT IT DEPT-Tier II SAR.pptxbmit1
The document provides guidelines for submitting a Self Assessment Report (SAR) for undergraduate engineering programs seeking accreditation from the National Board of Accreditation. It outlines the format and content required in the SAR, including:
1. Institutional and program information in Part A.
2. Program-specific criteria in Part B, including vision, mission, outcomes, curriculum, teaching-learning processes, course and program outcomes, student performance, faculty, facilities, and continuous improvement.
3. Criteria are assigned marks and the SAR requires correlation tables to map courses and outcomes, in addition to reporting attainment levels for course and program outcomes.
The document provides an overview and agenda for a project leaders training course on grants management. It discusses the goals of developing grants management knowledge and skills. The course objectives are to increase participants' understanding of compliance requirements, writing project statements and reports, communication, and grants management processes. An overview is given of the grants process including pre-award, award, post-award, and closeout stages while ensuring compliance.
The document summarizes a grant writers' workshop that covered the NIH application and scoring process. It discusses major changes to NIH scoring, applications, and the grants process. Workshop sections focused on analyzing request for proposals, preparing and submitting applications, determining allowable costs, and administering grants in compliance with uniform requirements.
This document provides guidance on best practices for managing externally funded sponsored research projects. It outlines key roles and responsibilities, including project initiation, budget monitoring, reporting requirements, and project closure. Effective project management is important to ensure funds are spent efficiently and funder expectations are met. Regular budget reviews and exception reporting help identify risks or variances. While unanticipated events may occur, open communication between all parties helps address issues and fulfill obligations.
Promoting Study Abroad Partnerships for Innovation and Collabo.docxamrit47
Promoting Study Abroad Partnerships for Innovation and Collaboration
Checklist
Section I: Funding Opportunity Description
1. Background – nothing
2. Program Summary
___ a. Goal - How will UHD encourage more of its students to study in Latin
American and more Latin American students to study at UHD?
___ i. Academic mobility – Leverage private-public partnership for cost-
effective means to increase participation
___ ii. Can UHD double the number of students studying abroad in the
Western Hemisphere? How?
___ b. Purpose – Increase bi-directional collaboration in the Western
Hemisphere
and increase study abroad. Proposed activities and topics
___ i. Smart collaboration
___ ii. Language barriers - Check out the English Language Institute,
which is located at S-417 in the One Main Building.
___ iii. Diversity and inclusion
___ iv. Alumni engagement
___ v. Communication and marketing
___ vi. Quality
___ vii. Accreditation
___ viii. Credit transfer
___ ix Service and service learning
___ x. Resource development
___ xi. Incoming student housing plans
___ xii. Safety and security
___ xiii. Address how UHD will leverage institutional commitment to
increasing study abroad - Can UHD be the gateway for the U of
H System for study abroad in the Western Hemisphere. UHD
students can take classes at the Central Campus.
___ xiv. Address inclusion and diversity in study abroad and access to
underserved/underrepresented populations
___ c. Expected Results
___ i. Demonstrate increased awareness of the barriers to study abroad
at UHD
___ ii. New model to engage students in the Western Hemisphere
___ iii. Increase number of effective partnerships between U.S. HEIs and
non U.S. HEIs
Section III: Eligibility Information
___ 1. Eligible Applicants – UHD is Legal and accredited
___ 2. Cost Sharing or Matching Fund Requirements
___ a. Commitment to increasing study abroad in both directions
___ b. Cost sharing and additional funding from private sector partners
Section IV: Application and Submission
___ 1. Online Submission Process – Must submit through Blackboard Learn
Assignments tool.
___ 2. Technical Application Format
___ a. Maximum 10 pages
___ b. Times New Roman
___ c. 12-point font
___ d. Single space
___ e. 8 ½ X 11-inch paper
___ f. 1-inch margins
___ g. Each page numbered consecutively, beginning after the cover page
___ h. Cover page, dividers, table of contents, annexes not counted toward 10 ...
Outline for Grant Proposal Final Due October 26, 2019Students.docxvannagoforth
Outline for Grant Proposal
Final Due: October 26, 2019
Students – you are to create a grant proposal that includes the sections discussed below. When considering your approach to completing this assignment, write the proposal as if you were asking me to fund the new innovative program/project that you developed as a result of your research. In addition to the proposal outlined in the following sections, each student should have a cover letter to his/her proposal. See the sample cover letter in your textbook. Appendices to this outline are provided to help you with objectives and evaluation design decisions.
1. Proposal Introduction (1 page-2 points)
a. Develop a brief explanation of the proposal content. This is an overview of what the Funder can expect to read in the grant proposal (deal with this section as if you were developing an abstract). Save the background of the problem for the statement of need section.
2. Statement of Need (3 pages-5 points)
a. Explain to the Funder the background of the issue and set the foundation of a compelling argument for why your proposal should get funded.
b. Use information from the following sources to establish the rationale for why your proposal is deserving of funding: the literature reviewed for your annotated bibliography, findings from the Surveys, Focus Groups, and/or qualitative interviews, any pre-existing data from your agency, government publications, and other organizations.
3. Project Goals and Objectives (1 page-5 points)
a. Explain to the Funder what your overall goal will be and your outcome objectives. You should have two or three outcome objectives.
b. Remember to use S.M.A.R.T. objectives (Appendix A).
c. Objectives should be Outcome rather than Process.
4. Project Logic Model (1 page-3 points)
a. Explain the theory behind the logic model concept and the rationale for using it.
b. Using the logic model format that you were provided, show the Funder what resources will be needed, how they will be used, what outcomes are anticipated, how the outcomes/objectives will be evaluated, and the overall impact of the project.
5. Project Description (4 pages – 10 points)
a. Give a detailed narrative of how you envision the funded project operating. List and describe the activities that will be included in the project design. This section should include at least the following:
· Who will receive the services, how will they be recruited, and screened, what will be the eligibility criteria for participation, and what will be the intake process
· List and describe each of the service components
· Describe the flow of services, or how will the participants move through the service sequence
· How many units of service will be provided for each service component
· Who will provide the services and what will be their qualifications
· Include a workplan/or Gantt chart
6. Project Resources and Budget (3 pages-5 points)
a. Using the sample that you are provided, complete a budget for the propo ...
This document outlines the Planning Commission's form and instructions for developing projects in Pakistan's social sectors such as education, health, water, and culture. It provides a 15-point outline for project proposals covering project details, objectives, costs, implementation schedule, management structure, and other essential information. Instructions are also given for each section to guide comprehensive yet concise completion of the form.
This document outlines the establishment of Centers for Training and Research in Frontier Areas of Science and Technology (FAST) in India. Key points include:
- The centers will focus on new and emerging technologies relevant to national development goals through collaborative research between academics and industry/public agencies. Priority areas include energy, water, environment, and smart materials.
- Selection of centers will be based on the proposed research area's relevance, institutional preparedness and collaboration, reasonable budget, multidisciplinarity, potential for technological development and translation to prototypes/patents/publications, and ability to scale up PhD/Masters enrollment and sustain itself after funding.
- Envisaged center activities include improving R&D
The document describes a mini-grant program from Dillard University's Center for Teaching, Learning, and Academic Technology to provide funding for faculty research projects. Eligible faculty can receive up to $5,000 to conduct original research resulting in publications, exhibitions or performances. The deadline to apply is April 15th and funding decisions will be made by April 25th. Recipients must submit a progress report on October 1st detailing how funds were used and the status of their research outcomes.
Grant Writing: The Major Components of a Grant Proposal is a presentation of John Ngong, Founder of the Tukul School in a collaborative weekend masterclass organised by the Tukul School and Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 14th October 2023
- The document summarizes the internship experience of Eric Jimmy Busiisa at the Civil Society Budget Advocacy Group in Uganda from June to July 2015.
- During the 8-week internship, Eric assisted with database entry, report writing, data analysis, and event planning. He gained skills in technical writing, data management, planning, and communication.
- While the internship was largely positive, Eric faced some challenges including limited computer access, space, and high transportation costs, and recommends providing interns with more support and fieldwork opportunities going forward.
This document outlines the Planning Commission's standardized form (PC-1 form) for proposing and reporting on development projects in Pakistan's social sectors such as education, health, water supply, and culture. The form includes 15 sections requesting key details about the proposed project such as its objectives and justification, implementation plan, costs, benefits, and management structure. Instructions are provided for completing each section depending on the social sector. The goal is to collect essential information to evaluate proposed projects and monitor their progress in a consistent manner across sectors.
Michigan State University (MSU) - College of Education - Institute for Research on Teaching and Learning (IRTL) Grants and Fellowships Workshop Series - Part II: Budget Preparation for Research Projects - February 2015 - Megan Drangstveit, Marcy Wallace
This document summarizes a training session on budget preparation and management for research grants. It covers:
1) Reading guidelines and evaluating budget needs to ensure costs are allowable and fit the project scope.
2) Elements of a budget including direct costs like salaries, fringe benefits, equipment, and indirect costs. It also discusses justifying costs and calculating fringe rates.
3) Special requirements funders may have around cost sharing, travel, F&A limits, and prohibited cost categories. The training stresses starting early, asking for help, and incorporating the budget into the proposal.
The document provides information on the format and process for self-assessment reports (SAR) submitted to the National Board of Accreditation (NBA) for undergraduate engineering programs. It outlines the SAR format, including sections on institutional information, program-specific details, criteria and weightages. The criteria include vision, mission and objectives, curriculum, outcomes, student performance, faculty, facilities, and continuous improvement. The document also provides examples of program outcomes and criteria summaries to guide institutions in completing the SAR correctly.
Indore-PPT-4-Tier II SAR-CRM-8-06-2018.pptxssuser226fc4
The document provides information on the format and guidelines for preparing a Self Assessment Report (SAR) for undergraduate engineering programs seeking accreditation from the National Board of Accreditation (NBA). It discusses the SAR format, including sections on institutional information, program-specific details, criteria for assessment, and guidelines. The key points are:
1) The SAR forms the basis for the accreditation process and is prepared by the institute applying for accreditation.
2) It requires information on the institute, programs, criteria and processes to be assessed. The criteria cover aspects like vision, curriculum, outcomes, faculty, facilities and continuous improvement.
3) Correlation matrices are used to establish linkages between
The document provides information on the format and process for the Self Assessment Report (SAR) submitted to the National Board of Accreditation (NBA) by undergraduate engineering programs for accreditation. It outlines the SAR format, including institutional information, program-specific details, criteria and weightages. The criteria cover areas like vision, mission and objectives, curriculum, outcomes, faculty, facilities, and continuous improvement. The document also provides an annexure listing sample program outcomes and explains the accreditation process involves a two-day visit by peer evaluators and an exit meeting to finalize the accreditation report.
This document is an application for professional development funds from Colorado Mountain College for the 2010-2011 fiscal year. It requests information such as the applicant's name, address, department, and details of the proposed professional development activity or event. If approved, funds of up to $1,500 can be provided for activities such as travel, lodging, meals, registration fees, materials, and other expenses. The application must be signed by the applicant and campus representatives and include a budget summary and answers to questions about how the activity aligns with CMC's mission and the importance and benefits of the activity. It should be scanned and emailed to a specified recipient by the deadline according to the program guidelines.
The document outlines the key components of an effective proposal for obtaining grant funding, including a summary, introduction, problem statement, objectives, methods, evaluation plan, budget details, and appendices. It provides examples and describes what should be included in each section. Specifically, the summary should concisely overview the organization, issue being addressed, duration, objectives, strategies, and funds requested. The introduction establishes the organization's background and qualifications for the project. The problem statement justifies the need through statistics and facts. [END SUMMARY]
Jornada informativa sobre la convocatoria Individual Fellowships (IF) dentro de las Acciones Marie Curie del Programa Marco Europeo Horizonte 2020. El evento, celebrado en el Instituto de la Grasa - CSIC, fue organizado por la Agencia Andaluza del Conocimiento en colaboración con la Universidad Pablo de Olavide y el Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.
Nepal Partnership Pilot Projects RFA 2023.pdfNeerajOjha17
This document is a request for applications for pilot projects through the AMPATH Nepal Partnership between Mount Sinai, Dhulikhel Hospital, and Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences. It provides information on the purpose, types of eligible projects, funding amounts, requirements, review criteria, timeline and contacts. Projects focusing on care, education or research can apply for up to $20,000 in funding for up to 2 years. Applications are due by December 15th and will be reviewed based on significance, collaboration, approach and sustainability. Funded projects will be expected to submit progress reports and a final report.
This document outlines the Project Cycle Implementation Plan (PC-1) for the Southern Punjab Poverty Alleviation Project (SPPAP) funded by the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). The SPPAP aims to reduce poverty in four districts in Southern Punjab through vocational training, entrepreneurship programs, and other community initiatives. The PC-1 details the project location, objectives, implementation structure, management plan, budget, and metrics to monitor progress. Key aspects include job creation, skills development, increasing incomes, and mobilizing local communities and organizations to support poverty reduction efforts in the target regions.
The document provides guidelines for the winter project that MBA students at S. K. PATEL INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT & COMPUTER STUDIES must complete. The objectives are to learn practical industry aspects, understand organizational dynamics, and study a functional area in detail. Students will select a company for an 8-day visit to analyze the industry, organization, and one department. They must write an individual report following formatting guidelines, including analyzing the selected department in detail. Faculty guides are assigned based on student roll numbers.
Budget Prepation Powerpoint - 020717.pptAnimikh Ray
The document provides guidance on creating a project budget, including:
- A budget estimates financial resources needed and includes a justification of costs. Allowable costs must be reasonable, allocable, and consistently applied per sponsor specifications.
- Direct costs include personnel salaries and benefits, travel, equipment, supplies, subawards, and other expenses. Indirect costs are also calculated.
- When creating a budget, reviewers should examine sponsor guidelines and determine direct costs, calculate indirect costs, develop the budget format, and write a justification.
The document provides guidance on creating a project budget, including:
- A budget estimates financial resources needed and includes a justification of costs. Allowable costs must be reasonable, allocable, and consistently applied per sponsor specifications.
- Direct costs include personnel salaries and benefits, travel, equipment, supplies, subawards, and other expenses. Indirect costs are also calculated.
- When creating a budget, reviewers should examine sponsor guidelines and determine direct costs, calculate indirect costs, develop the budget format, and write a justification.
recovery of indirect costs
(F&A) on direct costs
classified as equipment
Software Engineering and Project Management - Introduction, Modeling Concepts...Prakhyath Rai
Introduction, Modeling Concepts and Class Modeling: What is Object orientation? What is OO development? OO Themes; Evidence for usefulness of OO development; OO modeling history. Modeling
as Design technique: Modeling, abstraction, The Three models. Class Modeling: Object and Class Concept, Link and associations concepts, Generalization and Inheritance, A sample class model, Navigation of class models, and UML diagrams
Building the Analysis Models: Requirement Analysis, Analysis Model Approaches, Data modeling Concepts, Object Oriented Analysis, Scenario-Based Modeling, Flow-Oriented Modeling, class Based Modeling, Creating a Behavioral Model.
Outline for Grant Proposal Final Due October 26, 2019Students.docxvannagoforth
Outline for Grant Proposal
Final Due: October 26, 2019
Students – you are to create a grant proposal that includes the sections discussed below. When considering your approach to completing this assignment, write the proposal as if you were asking me to fund the new innovative program/project that you developed as a result of your research. In addition to the proposal outlined in the following sections, each student should have a cover letter to his/her proposal. See the sample cover letter in your textbook. Appendices to this outline are provided to help you with objectives and evaluation design decisions.
1. Proposal Introduction (1 page-2 points)
a. Develop a brief explanation of the proposal content. This is an overview of what the Funder can expect to read in the grant proposal (deal with this section as if you were developing an abstract). Save the background of the problem for the statement of need section.
2. Statement of Need (3 pages-5 points)
a. Explain to the Funder the background of the issue and set the foundation of a compelling argument for why your proposal should get funded.
b. Use information from the following sources to establish the rationale for why your proposal is deserving of funding: the literature reviewed for your annotated bibliography, findings from the Surveys, Focus Groups, and/or qualitative interviews, any pre-existing data from your agency, government publications, and other organizations.
3. Project Goals and Objectives (1 page-5 points)
a. Explain to the Funder what your overall goal will be and your outcome objectives. You should have two or three outcome objectives.
b. Remember to use S.M.A.R.T. objectives (Appendix A).
c. Objectives should be Outcome rather than Process.
4. Project Logic Model (1 page-3 points)
a. Explain the theory behind the logic model concept and the rationale for using it.
b. Using the logic model format that you were provided, show the Funder what resources will be needed, how they will be used, what outcomes are anticipated, how the outcomes/objectives will be evaluated, and the overall impact of the project.
5. Project Description (4 pages – 10 points)
a. Give a detailed narrative of how you envision the funded project operating. List and describe the activities that will be included in the project design. This section should include at least the following:
· Who will receive the services, how will they be recruited, and screened, what will be the eligibility criteria for participation, and what will be the intake process
· List and describe each of the service components
· Describe the flow of services, or how will the participants move through the service sequence
· How many units of service will be provided for each service component
· Who will provide the services and what will be their qualifications
· Include a workplan/or Gantt chart
6. Project Resources and Budget (3 pages-5 points)
a. Using the sample that you are provided, complete a budget for the propo ...
This document outlines the Planning Commission's form and instructions for developing projects in Pakistan's social sectors such as education, health, water, and culture. It provides a 15-point outline for project proposals covering project details, objectives, costs, implementation schedule, management structure, and other essential information. Instructions are also given for each section to guide comprehensive yet concise completion of the form.
This document outlines the establishment of Centers for Training and Research in Frontier Areas of Science and Technology (FAST) in India. Key points include:
- The centers will focus on new and emerging technologies relevant to national development goals through collaborative research between academics and industry/public agencies. Priority areas include energy, water, environment, and smart materials.
- Selection of centers will be based on the proposed research area's relevance, institutional preparedness and collaboration, reasonable budget, multidisciplinarity, potential for technological development and translation to prototypes/patents/publications, and ability to scale up PhD/Masters enrollment and sustain itself after funding.
- Envisaged center activities include improving R&D
The document describes a mini-grant program from Dillard University's Center for Teaching, Learning, and Academic Technology to provide funding for faculty research projects. Eligible faculty can receive up to $5,000 to conduct original research resulting in publications, exhibitions or performances. The deadline to apply is April 15th and funding decisions will be made by April 25th. Recipients must submit a progress report on October 1st detailing how funds were used and the status of their research outcomes.
Grant Writing: The Major Components of a Grant Proposal is a presentation of John Ngong, Founder of the Tukul School in a collaborative weekend masterclass organised by the Tukul School and Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 14th October 2023
- The document summarizes the internship experience of Eric Jimmy Busiisa at the Civil Society Budget Advocacy Group in Uganda from June to July 2015.
- During the 8-week internship, Eric assisted with database entry, report writing, data analysis, and event planning. He gained skills in technical writing, data management, planning, and communication.
- While the internship was largely positive, Eric faced some challenges including limited computer access, space, and high transportation costs, and recommends providing interns with more support and fieldwork opportunities going forward.
This document outlines the Planning Commission's standardized form (PC-1 form) for proposing and reporting on development projects in Pakistan's social sectors such as education, health, water supply, and culture. The form includes 15 sections requesting key details about the proposed project such as its objectives and justification, implementation plan, costs, benefits, and management structure. Instructions are provided for completing each section depending on the social sector. The goal is to collect essential information to evaluate proposed projects and monitor their progress in a consistent manner across sectors.
Michigan State University (MSU) - College of Education - Institute for Research on Teaching and Learning (IRTL) Grants and Fellowships Workshop Series - Part II: Budget Preparation for Research Projects - February 2015 - Megan Drangstveit, Marcy Wallace
This document summarizes a training session on budget preparation and management for research grants. It covers:
1) Reading guidelines and evaluating budget needs to ensure costs are allowable and fit the project scope.
2) Elements of a budget including direct costs like salaries, fringe benefits, equipment, and indirect costs. It also discusses justifying costs and calculating fringe rates.
3) Special requirements funders may have around cost sharing, travel, F&A limits, and prohibited cost categories. The training stresses starting early, asking for help, and incorporating the budget into the proposal.
The document provides information on the format and process for self-assessment reports (SAR) submitted to the National Board of Accreditation (NBA) for undergraduate engineering programs. It outlines the SAR format, including sections on institutional information, program-specific details, criteria and weightages. The criteria include vision, mission and objectives, curriculum, outcomes, student performance, faculty, facilities, and continuous improvement. The document also provides examples of program outcomes and criteria summaries to guide institutions in completing the SAR correctly.
Indore-PPT-4-Tier II SAR-CRM-8-06-2018.pptxssuser226fc4
The document provides information on the format and guidelines for preparing a Self Assessment Report (SAR) for undergraduate engineering programs seeking accreditation from the National Board of Accreditation (NBA). It discusses the SAR format, including sections on institutional information, program-specific details, criteria for assessment, and guidelines. The key points are:
1) The SAR forms the basis for the accreditation process and is prepared by the institute applying for accreditation.
2) It requires information on the institute, programs, criteria and processes to be assessed. The criteria cover aspects like vision, curriculum, outcomes, faculty, facilities and continuous improvement.
3) Correlation matrices are used to establish linkages between
The document provides information on the format and process for the Self Assessment Report (SAR) submitted to the National Board of Accreditation (NBA) by undergraduate engineering programs for accreditation. It outlines the SAR format, including institutional information, program-specific details, criteria and weightages. The criteria cover areas like vision, mission and objectives, curriculum, outcomes, faculty, facilities, and continuous improvement. The document also provides an annexure listing sample program outcomes and explains the accreditation process involves a two-day visit by peer evaluators and an exit meeting to finalize the accreditation report.
This document is an application for professional development funds from Colorado Mountain College for the 2010-2011 fiscal year. It requests information such as the applicant's name, address, department, and details of the proposed professional development activity or event. If approved, funds of up to $1,500 can be provided for activities such as travel, lodging, meals, registration fees, materials, and other expenses. The application must be signed by the applicant and campus representatives and include a budget summary and answers to questions about how the activity aligns with CMC's mission and the importance and benefits of the activity. It should be scanned and emailed to a specified recipient by the deadline according to the program guidelines.
The document outlines the key components of an effective proposal for obtaining grant funding, including a summary, introduction, problem statement, objectives, methods, evaluation plan, budget details, and appendices. It provides examples and describes what should be included in each section. Specifically, the summary should concisely overview the organization, issue being addressed, duration, objectives, strategies, and funds requested. The introduction establishes the organization's background and qualifications for the project. The problem statement justifies the need through statistics and facts. [END SUMMARY]
Jornada informativa sobre la convocatoria Individual Fellowships (IF) dentro de las Acciones Marie Curie del Programa Marco Europeo Horizonte 2020. El evento, celebrado en el Instituto de la Grasa - CSIC, fue organizado por la Agencia Andaluza del Conocimiento en colaboración con la Universidad Pablo de Olavide y el Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.
Nepal Partnership Pilot Projects RFA 2023.pdfNeerajOjha17
This document is a request for applications for pilot projects through the AMPATH Nepal Partnership between Mount Sinai, Dhulikhel Hospital, and Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences. It provides information on the purpose, types of eligible projects, funding amounts, requirements, review criteria, timeline and contacts. Projects focusing on care, education or research can apply for up to $20,000 in funding for up to 2 years. Applications are due by December 15th and will be reviewed based on significance, collaboration, approach and sustainability. Funded projects will be expected to submit progress reports and a final report.
This document outlines the Project Cycle Implementation Plan (PC-1) for the Southern Punjab Poverty Alleviation Project (SPPAP) funded by the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). The SPPAP aims to reduce poverty in four districts in Southern Punjab through vocational training, entrepreneurship programs, and other community initiatives. The PC-1 details the project location, objectives, implementation structure, management plan, budget, and metrics to monitor progress. Key aspects include job creation, skills development, increasing incomes, and mobilizing local communities and organizations to support poverty reduction efforts in the target regions.
The document provides guidelines for the winter project that MBA students at S. K. PATEL INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT & COMPUTER STUDIES must complete. The objectives are to learn practical industry aspects, understand organizational dynamics, and study a functional area in detail. Students will select a company for an 8-day visit to analyze the industry, organization, and one department. They must write an individual report following formatting guidelines, including analyzing the selected department in detail. Faculty guides are assigned based on student roll numbers.
Budget Prepation Powerpoint - 020717.pptAnimikh Ray
The document provides guidance on creating a project budget, including:
- A budget estimates financial resources needed and includes a justification of costs. Allowable costs must be reasonable, allocable, and consistently applied per sponsor specifications.
- Direct costs include personnel salaries and benefits, travel, equipment, supplies, subawards, and other expenses. Indirect costs are also calculated.
- When creating a budget, reviewers should examine sponsor guidelines and determine direct costs, calculate indirect costs, develop the budget format, and write a justification.
The document provides guidance on creating a project budget, including:
- A budget estimates financial resources needed and includes a justification of costs. Allowable costs must be reasonable, allocable, and consistently applied per sponsor specifications.
- Direct costs include personnel salaries and benefits, travel, equipment, supplies, subawards, and other expenses. Indirect costs are also calculated.
- When creating a budget, reviewers should examine sponsor guidelines and determine direct costs, calculate indirect costs, develop the budget format, and write a justification.
recovery of indirect costs
(F&A) on direct costs
classified as equipment
Similar to Building_Blocks_for_Investigators.ppt (20)
Software Engineering and Project Management - Introduction, Modeling Concepts...Prakhyath Rai
Introduction, Modeling Concepts and Class Modeling: What is Object orientation? What is OO development? OO Themes; Evidence for usefulness of OO development; OO modeling history. Modeling
as Design technique: Modeling, abstraction, The Three models. Class Modeling: Object and Class Concept, Link and associations concepts, Generalization and Inheritance, A sample class model, Navigation of class models, and UML diagrams
Building the Analysis Models: Requirement Analysis, Analysis Model Approaches, Data modeling Concepts, Object Oriented Analysis, Scenario-Based Modeling, Flow-Oriented Modeling, class Based Modeling, Creating a Behavioral Model.
DEEP LEARNING FOR SMART GRID INTRUSION DETECTION: A HYBRID CNN-LSTM-BASED MODELijaia
As digital technology becomes more deeply embedded in power systems, protecting the communication
networks of Smart Grids (SG) has emerged as a critical concern. Distributed Network Protocol 3 (DNP3)
represents a multi-tiered application layer protocol extensively utilized in Supervisory Control and Data
Acquisition (SCADA)-based smart grids to facilitate real-time data gathering and control functionalities.
Robust Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) are necessary for early threat detection and mitigation because
of the interconnection of these networks, which makes them vulnerable to a variety of cyberattacks. To
solve this issue, this paper develops a hybrid Deep Learning (DL) model specifically designed for intrusion
detection in smart grids. The proposed approach is a combination of the Convolutional Neural Network
(CNN) and the Long-Short-Term Memory algorithms (LSTM). We employed a recent intrusion detection
dataset (DNP3), which focuses on unauthorized commands and Denial of Service (DoS) cyberattacks, to
train and test our model. The results of our experiments show that our CNN-LSTM method is much better
at finding smart grid intrusions than other deep learning algorithms used for classification. In addition,
our proposed approach improves accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score, achieving a high detection
accuracy rate of 99.50%.
Mechatronics is a multidisciplinary field that refers to the skill sets needed in the contemporary, advanced automated manufacturing industry. At the intersection of mechanics, electronics, and computing, mechatronics specialists create simpler, smarter systems. Mechatronics is an essential foundation for the expected growth in automation and manufacturing.
Mechatronics deals with robotics, control systems, and electro-mechanical systems.
Use PyCharm for remote debugging of WSL on a Windo cf5c162d672e4e58b4dde5d797...shadow0702a
This document serves as a comprehensive step-by-step guide on how to effectively use PyCharm for remote debugging of the Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL) on a local Windows machine. It meticulously outlines several critical steps in the process, starting with the crucial task of enabling permissions, followed by the installation and configuration of WSL.
The guide then proceeds to explain how to set up the SSH service within the WSL environment, an integral part of the process. Alongside this, it also provides detailed instructions on how to modify the inbound rules of the Windows firewall to facilitate the process, ensuring that there are no connectivity issues that could potentially hinder the debugging process.
The document further emphasizes on the importance of checking the connection between the Windows and WSL environments, providing instructions on how to ensure that the connection is optimal and ready for remote debugging.
It also offers an in-depth guide on how to configure the WSL interpreter and files within the PyCharm environment. This is essential for ensuring that the debugging process is set up correctly and that the program can be run effectively within the WSL terminal.
Additionally, the document provides guidance on how to set up breakpoints for debugging, a fundamental aspect of the debugging process which allows the developer to stop the execution of their code at certain points and inspect their program at those stages.
Finally, the document concludes by providing a link to a reference blog. This blog offers additional information and guidance on configuring the remote Python interpreter in PyCharm, providing the reader with a well-rounded understanding of the process.
Build the Next Generation of Apps with the Einstein 1 Platform.
Rejoignez Philippe Ozil pour une session de workshops qui vous guidera à travers les détails de la plateforme Einstein 1, l'importance des données pour la création d'applications d'intelligence artificielle et les différents outils et technologies que Salesforce propose pour vous apporter tous les bénéfices de l'IA.
Accident detection system project report.pdfKamal Acharya
The Rapid growth of technology and infrastructure has made our lives easier. The
advent of technology has also increased the traffic hazards and the road accidents take place
frequently which causes huge loss of life and property because of the poor emergency facilities.
Many lives could have been saved if emergency service could get accident information and
reach in time. Our project will provide an optimum solution to this draw back. A piezo electric
sensor can be used as a crash or rollover detector of the vehicle during and after a crash. With
signals from a piezo electric sensor, a severe accident can be recognized. According to this
project when a vehicle meets with an accident immediately piezo electric sensor will detect the
signal or if a car rolls over. Then with the help of GSM module and GPS module, the location
will be sent to the emergency contact. Then after conforming the location necessary action will
be taken. If the person meets with a small accident or if there is no serious threat to anyone’s
life, then the alert message can be terminated by the driver by a switch provided in order to
avoid wasting the valuable time of the medical rescue team.
Null Bangalore | Pentesters Approach to AWS IAMDivyanshu
#Abstract:
- Learn more about the real-world methods for auditing AWS IAM (Identity and Access Management) as a pentester. So let us proceed with a brief discussion of IAM as well as some typical misconfigurations and their potential exploits in order to reinforce the understanding of IAM security best practices.
- Gain actionable insights into AWS IAM policies and roles, using hands on approach.
#Prerequisites:
- Basic understanding of AWS services and architecture
- Familiarity with cloud security concepts
- Experience using the AWS Management Console or AWS CLI.
- For hands on lab create account on [killercoda.com](https://killercoda.com/cloudsecurity-scenario/)
# Scenario Covered:
- Basics of IAM in AWS
- Implementing IAM Policies with Least Privilege to Manage S3 Bucket
- Objective: Create an S3 bucket with least privilege IAM policy and validate access.
- Steps:
- Create S3 bucket.
- Attach least privilege policy to IAM user.
- Validate access.
- Exploiting IAM PassRole Misconfiguration
-Allows a user to pass a specific IAM role to an AWS service (ec2), typically used for service access delegation. Then exploit PassRole Misconfiguration granting unauthorized access to sensitive resources.
- Objective: Demonstrate how a PassRole misconfiguration can grant unauthorized access.
- Steps:
- Allow user to pass IAM role to EC2.
- Exploit misconfiguration for unauthorized access.
- Access sensitive resources.
- Exploiting IAM AssumeRole Misconfiguration with Overly Permissive Role
- An overly permissive IAM role configuration can lead to privilege escalation by creating a role with administrative privileges and allow a user to assume this role.
- Objective: Show how overly permissive IAM roles can lead to privilege escalation.
- Steps:
- Create role with administrative privileges.
- Allow user to assume the role.
- Perform administrative actions.
- Differentiation between PassRole vs AssumeRole
Try at [killercoda.com](https://killercoda.com/cloudsecurity-scenario/)
Discover the latest insights on Data Driven Maintenance with our comprehensive webinar presentation. Learn about traditional maintenance challenges, the right approach to utilizing data, and the benefits of adopting a Data Driven Maintenance strategy. Explore real-world examples, industry best practices, and innovative solutions like FMECA and the D3M model. This presentation, led by expert Jules Oudmans, is essential for asset owners looking to optimize their maintenance processes and leverage digital technologies for improved efficiency and performance. Download now to stay ahead in the evolving maintenance landscape.
1. Budget Building Blocks
for Investigators
2014 NIH Regional Seminar on Program
Funding & Grants Administration
Baltimore, MD
Rosemarie Hunziker, Ph.D.
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging
and Bioengineering (NIBIB)
2. Optimists see the glass as half full,
and to pessimists it is half empty.
Engineers say the glass is twice
as big as it needs to be.
Scientists want to know
esoterics about the contents.
Me, I just want to drink the wine.
3. Budget Basics
Getting Started
Types of Budgets
Budget Components
Preparing a Budget
Other Considerations
Award Policy Issues
3
Build a budget…
don’t back into one.
4. Tips for Getting Started
Know your limits!
− FOAs may have caps and/or exclusions
− Some expenses are “unallowable” (e.g. lobbying, entertainment)
Identify what is necessary and reasonable
– Request for lots of new equipment suggests an insufficient
environment to do the work
– Research grants are NOT training programs, but federal assistance
to achieve a scientific goal. Assign personnel wisely!
Direct costs: directly attributable to the project and allowable
– salaries w/ fringe benefits, student fees/tuition, consultants,
equipment, supplies, travel, publication, shared facility fees…
Indirect costs: “overhead” shared by all cost centers
– Specific rate is negotiated by the institution with the government
4
NIH Grant Application Budget Basics:
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/developing_budget.htm
5. Planning Meeting Output:
Blueprint for Successful Research
Project Title: really a quick summary
Principal Investigator(s) and Key Personnel: defines role, commitment
Overall goal: resolve an important issue in a timely manner
Specific goal: best stated as a hypothesis (a boastful claim, substantiated by data)
Impact: 2-3 sentences, define success, distill innovation and significance
RESEARCH Responsibilities, Costs, Milestones and Timeline
1. Validate the … (THIS AIM MUST WORK—i.e. no/low risk here!)
1a. Compare… confirm…
1b. Optimize the dose/time course…
Overseer Cost Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8
2. Elucidate the mechanism… (May omit for high risk (e.g. R21) grants.)
2a.
2b.
2c.
3. Assess the biocompatibility of … in a …
*
* High-risk element. Propose and discuss alternatives. Decision point.
(Transition to next grant.)
7. Types of Budgets
Categorical/Itemized vs Modular
Multi-Project/Consortium
SBIR/STTR
Clinical Trials
Fellowships
Institutional Training Grants
Research Career Development Awards
7
8. Application Guide
PHS SF424 Research & Related Budget
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/424/index.htm#inst
− 4.7 R&R Budget Component
• 4.7.1 Section A and B
o Senior/Key Persons; Other Personnel
• 4.7.2 Sections C through E
o Equipment; Travel; Participant/Trainee Support costs
• 4.7.3 Sections F through K
o Other Direct Costs; Total Direct; Indirect Costs
o Justification
• 4.7.4 Cumulative Budget
8
14. Budget Justification
14
Reviewers and Administrators use this to
decide if you really need what you request
− Will not be obvious in the “Approach” section
Explain the role/specific responsibilities for
each team member
– Is the commitment appropriate to the work planned?
Justify unusual/large expenses
– Replace/augment equipment, animal/human studies, consultants…
Show the value of subcontracts vs. “in house”
– Special expertise? Special resources? Special populations?
15. When people are free to do as they please,
They usually imitate each other.
17. R&R Budget Components
Modular Applications
Grant applications with annual direct costs are of
$250,000 or less use Modular Budgets
− Applicable only to R01, R03, R15, R21 and R34 applications
Built on modules of $25,000: no future year escalations
No categorical budget
− at time of application
− at time of award
No difference in allowable costs
No difference in post-award financial management
requirements
PHS SF424 Research & Related Budget: 5.4 Modular
Budget Component forms
17
20. Creating a Modular Budget
1. Start with an itemized budget (R&R budget
component 4.7.1)
2. Create out-year budgets
3. Divide total budget for all years by number
of years
4. Request same number of modules each year*
5. Consortia total costs are calculated separately
and may be rounded to nearest $1,000
* equipment exception
20
21. More on Modular Budgets
List all personnel at applicant organization
− Also include names of collaborators, consultants, “to be
appointed” individuals, their roles, and number of months
devoted to project
List all personnel associated with Consortia/Contractual
arrangements, their roles, and number of months
devoted to project
NIH may request detailed budget to address specific
issues
For additional information on modular budgets see:
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/modular/modular.htm
21
22. How is the budget used by
Reviewers and Program Officials?
Budget is not used to assess scientific merit
and is discussed/reviewed after the scientific
merit is assessed and application is scored
Reveals the applicant’s understanding of
what it takes to accomplish the proposed
research
22
24. Sections A & B: Personnel
Determine the amount of time (effort) that
the PI will spend on this project.
Calendar vs. Academic/Summer months
Determine the number, qualifications and
amount of time needed for other personnel
Co-investigators
Technicians
Postdoctoral Fellows
Graduate Students
Undergraduate Students
24
Calculating “person months”:
https://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/person_months_faqs.htm
26. Salary Cap
Salary Limitation (Section 203) is one of the
congressional mandates in the NIH Appropriation
Restricts the amount of direct salary that can be paid
with federal funds under a grant or contract to Executive
Level II of the Federal Executive Pay Scale ($181,500)
26
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-14-052.html
However, the participants actual base salary (even if
exceeding the cap) should be used on the budget page.
− Helps NIH know the current pay scales and justify increases
− Grants Specialist will adjust to meet the cap at the time of award
27. No magic numbers regarding the qualifications and/or
number of individuals needed for each aim.
Be realistic about what each individual can
accomplish and the time necessary for the work.
Explain any fluctuations in effort levels and/or staffing
levels in outyears (in the budget justification).
27
Personnel (continued)
28. 28
The best leaders inspire by example. When that’s not an option,
Brute intimidation works pretty well too.
29. Section C: Is equipment needed?
If additional expensive equipment (i.e., more than
$5000) is needed, then this is the time to consider
requesting it.
Equipment should be project specific – be sure to
include a written justification.
Most equipment is requested during the first year of the
grant.
If using a modular budget format, extra module(s)
may be requested to cover equipment.
29
30. Section D: Travel funds
This amount is usually small:
− $1,000 - 2,000 per scientific meeting per
individual per year
Generally supports travel for presenting
the results of the effort
− 1 meeting per year
− 2 – 3 performers
30
31. Section E: Participant/Trainee
Support Costs
Unless stated in the FOA, this section
should be left blank for NIH applications
Include tuition remission under Section F:
Other Direct Costs
31
32. Section F: Other Direct Costs
Estimate the materials and supplies needed for the
personnel involved.
− Usually ~$12,000–15,000/year per FTE
− Animal intensive studies, studies involving human subjects, or
extensive bioinformatics, nanofabrication/foundary expenses
tend to be more costly.
− In silico or in vitro studies tend to be less costly for supplies.
Publication costs
Equipment maintenance
Consortium/subcontracts
Tuition remission
Shared facility fees
… 32
34. Add it all Up – Year 1
Cal Req. Fringe Funds
Mon Salary BenefitsReq.
A. Senior/Key Person
PI 2 15,333 4,293 19,626
B. Other Personnel
Postdoc Assoc 12 38,976 10,913 49,889
Grad Student 12 20,772 5,454 26,226
Grad Student 12 20,772 5,454 26,226
C. Equipment – Microscope 19,000
D. Travel - (2 meetings) 4,000
E. Participant/Trainee usually left blank
F. Other Direct Costs
Materials/Supplies 25,533
Publication Costs 1,500
Subaward/Consortium/Contractual costs none
Tuition Remission 7,000
G. Total Direct Costs 179,000
34
35. Add it all up
Calculate the direct costs for the first year.
(for example, Year 1 budget = $179,000)
Calculate the direct costs for subsequent years
taking into account salary increases and
changes in funds requested for equipment.
Year 2 = $164,800
Year 3 = $169,744
Year 4 = $174,836
Year 5 = $180,081
35
37. Do I need to submit a
modular budget?
Calculate the total direct costs for all years
Total direct costs for 5 years = $868,461
Divide total by the number of years requested
Average direct costs = $173,692/yr
Investigator-initiated R01s up to $250,000/yr
must use modular format
Except applications from foreign (non-U.S.)
institutions
37
38. Convert Your Average Direct Costs to
the Modular Format
Round up to the next module (number divisible
by $25,000)
In the example, $173,692/yr rounds up to
$175,000/yr
No yearly increases for inflation
First year may include additional modules for
one-time expenses like equipment
In the example, add one additional module to
year 1 = $200,000
38
39. Reminder for R01 Budgets
All budget requests to NIH for R01 applications
use:
− the modular format when requesting direct costs of
$250,000 or less each year
− the non-modular format when requesting direct
costs greater than $250,000 in any year or if the
application is submitted from a foreign institution
When including collaborators at different
institutions
− Consortium F&A costs are not factored into the
modular direct cost limit
39
40. R01 Budget with Consortium Costs
Prepare an itemized budget for the
parent award
Prepare an itemized budget for
consortium/subcontract costs, including:
− Personnel
o salary and benefits
− Travel
o professional or investigator meeting
− Other Direct Costs
o Materials and Supplies
Total Direct Costs = $38,300
40
41. Total Consortium Costs
Consortium Direct Costs = $38,300
Consortium F&A
− consortium institution (at 50%) = $19,150
Consortium Total Costs = $57,450
Remember you may round to the nearest $1,000
41
42. 42
Add it all up
Should you request
a modular budget?
43.
44. R01 Grant with Consortium Budget
Submit as a modular budget
when requesting Direct Costs at or
below $250,000 per year…
… excluding Consortium F&A costs.
44
45. Modular Grant with Consortium Budget
In our example,
Year 1 – Itemized Total DC = $256,124
minus Consortium F&A = $ 19,150
Year 1 – Itemized DC excluding F&A = $236,974
Year 2 – Itemized DC excluding F&A = $224,513
Year 3 – Itemized DC excluding F&A = $231,249
Year 4 – Itemized DC excluding F&A = $238,186
Year 5 – Itemized DC excluding F&A = $245,332
Avg Direct Cost per yr (less consortia F&A) = $235,251
Round up to the next module = $250,000
45
46. Record Modular Budget with Consortium:
PHS 398 Modular Budget, Period 1
A. Direct Costs Funds Requested ($)
*Direct Cost less Consortium F&A $250,000
Consortium F&A $19,150
*Total Direct Costs $269,150
The total direct costs requested are allowed to exceed
the modular maximum ($250,000) by the amount of
F&A associated with the subcontract.
46
48. Poor planning on your part does not
constitute an emergency on mine.
Your Sponsored Projects Office has deadlines, too,
and is likely to have this response if you are late:
49. Money…money… and more money?
Applications requesting ≥ $500,000 DC in any single
year – applicant must seek permission to submit from
Institute staff at least 6 weeks before submission.
Multiple Principal Investigator R01 is intended for
projects that clearly require a “team science” approach.
The Multiple PI option should not be used as a means to
justify a large budget request.
Well-funded investigators should consult with Institute
staff regarding policies for support of new research in
well-funded laboratories.
49
50. Other Considerations
Budgets must be consistent with grantee
institutional policies and practice
Request reasonable amounts based on current
conditions and need
Don’t request contingencies or uncommitted
promotions
Justify everything, especially the unusual and
large ticket items
Ideally science drives the budget and justification
50
51. But I asked for what I needed?
Study section may recommend reductions
in amount and time
− Discuss with Program Officer if IRG-recommended
reductions can be restored
Funding institute may reduce budget
further and limit years of support
− Funding decisions are cannot be appealed
− Discuss with Program Officer if causes hardship
o Renegotiate specific aims if budget (or time!) reduction is
more than 25% of requested
51
53. Research Based on the
AWARDED budget…
Build a budget for the dollars and years
that are indicated in the Notice of Award
For modular grants, build in any increases
in spending over duration of grant
Prioritize research work and get started
53
54. 54
Who is Responsible for Financial
Management of a grant?
The Institution
The Principal Investigator
The Departmental Administrator
The Department Chair
To Whom is the Grant Awarded?
The Institution
57. 57
Pre-Award Costs
At grantee’s own risk and expense
Up to 90 days prior to the start date of a
competing award if costs:
− Are necessary to conduct the project, and
− Would be allowable under a potential award without
prior approval
Greater than 90 days requires prior approval
Costs need to be allowable and carefully
managed
58. 58
Cost Sharing
Not required for receiving unsolicited NIH
awards
There is mandatory cost sharing for salary in
excess of current salary cap
Be sure you intend to commit to cost
sharing when you propose an item at no
cost to the government.
59. 59
Read the Notice of Award!
Explains the details of the grant award
− Drawing down funds constitutes acceptance of terms
Special Terms and Conditions
Other Terms of Award
− Program regulations
o 42 CFR Part 52 - Grants for Research Projects
− Program and appropriation legislation
− 45 CFR Part 74 or 92 - HHS rules and requirements that
govern the administration of grants
− NIH Grants Policy Statement - compendium of several
regulatory requirements applicable to grants and
cooperative agreements
60. 60
Award Restrictions
Only applied to a particular grant for cause
Will be enumerated on the NoA in Section IV
Restricted funds must be tracked by grantee to
ensure compliance
Examples:
− restrict equipment funds pending receipt of current
price quote;
− prohibit human subjects research pending IRB review
61. Final thoughts on $$ and science
Most taxpayers think a $1M+ award is a lot
of money. Spend it wisely.
Start-up and staffing delays?
− OK to carry unspent funds forward for good cause, if
justified/explained.
Budget problems or questions
− Consult NIH Program and Grants Officers.
61
63. Where to get help
NIH OER Grants and Funding Information
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/about_grants.htm
SF424 R&R guides and FAQs
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/424/index.htm#inst
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/ElectronicReceipt/faq_full.htm
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/modular/modular.htm
PHS 398 instructions (paper submissions only)
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html
The grantee institution’s Sponsored Programs Office
NIH Program and Grants Management staff
Other experienced personnel at your institution
63
64. Tank ewe, berry mulch!
Rosemarie Hunziker, Ph.D.
Program Director,
Tissue Engineering/Regenerative Medicine,
and Biomaterials
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging
and Bioengineering (NIBIB)
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
301-451-1609
Rosemarie.Hunziker@nih.gov
www.nibib.nih.gov