2. www.warpspeedtraining.com
THE BEST COMPANIES ARE THE BEST COLLABORATORS
… more and more business will be done through
collaborations within and between companies, for a
very simple reason …
The next layers of value creation - whether in
technology, marketing, biomedicine, or manufacturing –
are becoming so complex that no single firm or
department is going to be able to master them alone.
Thomas Freidman, 2005, The World Is Flat. Farrar, Straus & Giroux (page 353)
4. www.warpspeedtraining.com
Work Groups versus Work Teams
Work Group
– A set of individuals who rely on the sum of
“individual bests’ for their performance
Work Team
– A group of people who must work
interdependently to achieve a specific
outcome for which they are collectively
responsible, whose tasks are interdependent,
and who develop specialized member roles
9. www.warpspeedtraining.com
When is a Team appropriate?
1. When the work is so
interdependent that
we need constant back
and forth consultation
and collaboration
11. When is a Team appropriate?
3. When the group
has a common
purpose for
being and produces
common work
products or
services
12. www.warpspeedtraining.com
When is a Team appropriate?
4. When the group
is committed to
building teamwork
and the
collaboration skills
necessary for team
success
13. www.warpspeedtraining.com
1.
The sum of our
individual best
efforts is sufficient
to ensure success
in our tasks
Our work is so
interdependent
that we need
constant back and
forth consultation
and collaboration
1 2 3 4
Circle the appropriate number
Diagnosis: Do you need a Team?
14. www.warpspeedtraining.com
2.
1 2 3 4
Circle the appropriate number
The work our
group needs to
accomplish is
well-understood
and doesn’t
require constant
complex decisions
The work that our
group needs to
accomplish is very
complex
Diagnosis: Do you need a Team?
15. www.warpspeedtraining.com
3.
1 2 3 4
Circle the appropriate number
Our group’s work
covers several
different purposes
and generates
independent
products/services
Our group has a
common purpose
for being and
produces common
work products or
services
Diagnosis: Do you need a Team?
16. www.warpspeedtraining.com
4.
1 2 3 4
Circle the appropriate number
Our group is not
interested in
putting forth a lot
of effort in
teambuilding
Our group is
committed to
building
teamwork and
collaboration
skills
Diagnosis: Do you need a Team?
17. www.warpspeedtraining.com
1 2 3 4
1. Total your ratings and divide your total by four
/ 4
2. Now map your score out of four on the line below
3. Your Results: If your score is between 3 and 4, you could
benefit from creating a team
Diagnosis: Do you need a Team?
23. www.warpspeedtraining.com
Task Strategies
• What are our purpose and
our goals?
• Do we have the right task
strategies for accomplishing
them?
• How much authority and
scope do we have to plan
and implement solutions?
• What kind of information
do we need?
The big questions for teams are:
24. www.warpspeedtraining.com
Social Strategies
The big questions for teams are:
• Do we have the right people
on the team?
• Do our processes ensure that
members contribute fully? Or
are we carrying dead weight?
• Do members understand &
fulfill their responsibilities
and their roles?
• Does the team abide by an
agreed upon set of group
norms?
• Are our meetings effective?
25. www.warpspeedtraining.com
Gaining Commitment
The big questions for teams are:
• Do people remain committed
to the task and to each
other?
• Does every member assume
full responsibility for
completing the team’s work?
• Do team members respect
and trust each other?
• Are there sub-groups or
cliques within the team?
26. www.warpspeedtraining.com
ASSESS YOUR TEAM
The Appendix contains a questionnaire
your can use to assess your team’s level of:
1. Task Strategies
2. Social Strategies
3. Level of Commitment
32. www.warpspeedtraining.com
Patient Communicators
• work hard to make
themselves understood
• work hard to understand
others
• do not blame each other
for misunderstandings
• do not insist on their
solutions
When problems
occur,
slow down
to promote
understanding
34. Use a Good Problem-Solving Process - Consistently
Joint Problem
Exploration
Joint Option
Development
Identify the problem, or
opportunity
Explore the problem or
opportunity
Gather relevant
information
Define what success will
look like
Develop a statement of
the problem or
opportunity
Generate many
possibilities and
options
Joint
Evaluation &
Selection
Assess the many options
Select and test the best
options
Develop plans & actions Track
and modify along the way
35. www.warpspeedtraining.com
If I had an hour to solve a
problem, I would spend 50
minutes defining the problem
and 10 minutes solving it.
- Albert Einstein
40. www.warpspeedtraining.com
put our ideas together to come up with
a superior decision
use the ideas we bring to the group
only as a starting point
build on each others’ ideas
work together to find solutions
acceptable to all of us
create solutions that are better than
any one of us could offer alone
share information with each other to
solve the task together
do more than just combine our points
of view
We:
41. Use Brainstorming Guidelines
• Do not judge the ideas of others
• Do not edit your own ideas
• Everyone is encouraged, but not pressured, to
participate
• Build on ideas already generated
• Record all ideas on a flip chart so that
everyone can see them
• Once all ideas are out, review, combine and
evaluate them
• Evaluate each idea according to its feasibility,
usefulness, and impact
• Multi-vote to identify the high priority ideas
Review,
combine &
evaluate
ideas
Generate &
build on ideas
45. The Domineering Team Member
The deadline for submission of the project XYZ interim report was fast approaching, and
Alex was worried. The project team was already showing signs of strain, and Alex
considered it extremely unfortunate to be paired with Chris on their part of the project. All
members of the project team had to perform their regular jobs on top of the project but
Chris seemed unusually busy and stressed. Although very assertive, even categorical, about
the project solutions, Chris had devoted little visible time and effort to the project so far.
Their meetings had been tense and brief, with Chris more or less dictating the contents of
the report from notes. Alex was not confident that their work to date was relevant to the
stated objectives of the project mandate, but Chris had either dismissed or totally ignored
these concerns. As Alex walked into Chris’ plush office and saw the desk piled high with
files, there was a moment of dread. Was this going to be another frustrating wrangle of a
meeting?
Chris, I’ve been thinking about our report a lot, and I think we ought to look at the
outline to make sure we’re on topic.
Godammit, Alex, are you still harping on that? I don’t have time for this! I’ve already
done most of the work on this, so where do you get off telling me my work is all
wrong?
Alex saw that Chris was on the verge of a major explosion and backed down:
Ok! Ok! Calm down! We’ll do it your way!
47. www.warpspeedtraining.com
Data
Conflict Analysis using the Circle of Conflict
• Missing information
• Wrong information
• Different views about what information is
relevant
• Different interpretations of the information
52. www.warpspeedtraining.com
Trouble on the Team
• Read the following vignette
• What do you think is the source of the
problem?
Use the Conflict Analysis Matrix provided
below
53. Overtime Blues
Drew was angry. One Tuesday morning in May, Jordan had sent round a voice
message, announcing a meeting for Friday afternoon at 4:30pm. It would
probably drag on and run into the opening dinner at the golf course that had
been planned and anticipated for weeks.
Did Jordan think their project team had nothing better to do than discuss work
on the weekend? Besides, Drew had made it clear the last time that the group
meetings should be meet earlier in the afternoon so as not to interfere with the
group members’ family and social life. Jordan was single and didn’t seem to
appreciate the balancing act that married project members all experienced,
especially those with his children.
Besides, Jordan seemed to lack confidence in the group as a whole to do good
work and so insisted on long meetings with “thorough” discussions. It was
simpler to just divide up the work, have each member do his or part, and report
back at their meetings. Besides, he knew that only Jordan and perhaps Gary were
eager to meet at such inconvenient times and for such long sessions. The other
three would agree with Drew if push came to shove. And it was time for shove.
54. Overtime Blues
It was only Tuesday, but already Jordan was dreading the upcoming meeting
Friday afternoon. She knew Drew would be angry about the time, but felt she
had no choice but to call it for 4:30pm. Her boss had not been keen on her joining
the project team and had made it clear that there would be little time off except
for Friday afternoons. What with more cutbacks rumoured in the department,
Jordan couldn’t afford to irritate the boss. The others in the group either had
supportive supervisors or were their own boss. They didn’t appear to appreciate
her situation; either that or they chose to ignore it. Besides which, the rest were
all men, and she felt they ignored her ideas and concerns in general, perhaps
without even realizing it. She had trouble with Drew in particular, although she
liked him well enough at first. He was so dominating and always seemed to ram
through his ideas and agendas as quickly as possible and then leave for another
appointment. She knew that Gary was also concerned that their meetings were
too short and superficial, but was not willing to “rock the boat.”
56. www.warpspeedtraining.com
The Moore Model
The Moore model suggests that you can
'contain’ or manage relationship conflicts
and you can work around value conflicts
but you cannot directly solve either.
It argues you should contain those two
first then focus the conflict into the
remaining three areas where solutions are
possible.
57. Conflict Analysis
Element Causes of Conflict Possible Prevention or
Solution
Structure
Interests
Data
Values Work around values
conflicts
Relationships Contain or manage
relationships conflict
58. Conflict Analysis
Element Causes of Conflict Possible Prevention or Solution
Structure Change variables blocking cooperation: i.e:
opposing goals, time pressures, distance,
location, authority imbalance, etc.
Interests Ask members to express aims and needs. Assess
areas of agreement/disagreement. Create
options. Find a joint solution.
Data Agree on which data are important, how to
collect them and their meaning. Agree on a
problem-solving approach.
Values Remove values from decision-making. Allow
parties to disagree on values. Search for
superordinate goals.
Relationships Control emotions through process. Encourage
good listening. Give opportunity to express
views. Remove toxicity. Depersonalize conflict.
59. N.B.
DO NOT AVOID CONFLICT:
www.warpspeedtraining.com
• Acknowledge the issue
• Discuss it
• Develop a process for managing it
61. Need to know more?
Contact me for more
information about our in-
house training or a free trial
of our online course in Team
Building
DrCarol@warpspeedtraining.com
Editor's Notes
Imagine a circle cut into five wedges. Each wedge represents potential causes of conflict. Data, structural, relationships, values and interests make up the five wedges of the circle. Each wedge can be the source of the problem or multiple wedges can be the cause of the problem. You can use this concept to help you figure out what is the origin of all of your headaches. Consider learning about this concept as adding another tool to your problem-solver tool kit.
Let’s take the first wedge: data or information. One of the causes of your problem could be that you are either missing information or the information you have is flawed. Or you could have different views of what information is relevant. Sometimes it’s different interpretations of the data or different ways the data is assessed. The key point here is that data or information is the root of the problem.
Fixes:
Surface assumptions about the parties’ assessment of data
Reach agreement on what data are important
Agree on joint process to collect data
Develop common criteria to assess data
Use third-party experts
Agree on what’s important
Agree on collection
Agree on meaning
Agree on a problem solving approach
Agree on what is important
The next wedge is interests. Interests are the ‘why’ in any problem. Most people will tell you ‘what’ they want, which we call their position. Interests are why they want it. Examples here are perceived and or actual competition over interests. Or it could be an argument over what procedure to use to execute a task. Also, sometimes deeper psychological differences or ego type issues (perceptions of trust, fairness, respect, status) are the root cause of the problem.
Fixes:
Focus on interests not positions
Develop integrative solutions
Search for ways to expand options
Ask members to express aims and needs
Find superordinate goals
Assess areas of agreement and disagreement
Create many options
Find a joint solution
The third wedge is structural. A difference in power or authority is a good example of a structural problem. Another example is who controls resources and how are those resources allocated or dispersed. Time constraints could be another cause of the conflict.
Fixes:
Be sure to define and clarify roles
Modify external pressures
Reallocate control of resources
Change time constraints
Negotiate a ratification process if authority at the table is a problem
Negotiate who needs to be present to effectively resolve the issue
Values are the focus of the fourth wedge. Different ways of life, ideology or worldview are examples of how what you value can be part of the problem. Having different criteria for evaluating ideas is another example. This wedge is all about whether team members are on the same page about their values.
Different values need not always cause conflict. Conflicts arise when someone tries to impose a set of values on someone else
Fixes:
Have the parties share information about their values
Do not define the problem in terms of value
Allow parties to agree to disagree on some matters
Search for super-ordinate goal shared by all parties
Remove from decision making
The final wedge of the circle is relationships. Misperceptions or stereotypes of others are common causes of relationship conflicts as are poor communication or miscommunication. Finally, repetitive negative behavior by a team member may lead to a deterioration of relationships. If left unresolved the relationships may be harmed beyond repair.
Fixes:
Control expressions of emotion through procedures and ground rules
Promote expression of emotions by legitimizing feelings
Improve communication
Block negative, repetitive behaviour by changing structure
Honour emotions
Encourage good listening
Give people opportunity to express views
Remove toxicity from statements; reframe to state the issues, less the toxic statements
By using the circle of conflict, you can begin to analyze the problem from a more objective viewpoint and untangle your problem with less effort and wasted energy.