The document discusses managing brand perceptions using 10 archetypes or "perception drivers". It provides examples of applying the framework to analyze brand positioning and alignment issues within an organization. A key takeaway is that understanding how internal and external stakeholders perceive a brand using these archetypes can help address confusion and improve strategic alignment.

1. “ A company's primary responsibility is to serve its customers. Profit is not the primary goal, but rather an essential condition for the company's continued existence.” Peter Drucker

2. Your Brand ... is an Expectation ... through emotions ... ... that connects ... By differentiating the experience

3. Use Emotion to Positioning Your brand? But Emotions are not rational constructs … … they defy logic and reason … . and are defined by perceptions … which defines our reality The key lies in understanding perceptions

4. Brand Perceptions The key to managing your brands … and how people behave around them … … is manage the perceptions of the brand! You need to manage … … the conscious and subconscious elements …. … .of your Brand Then you can control the perceptions around your brand … whether this is for … Your Executive … Your Staff … … Your Customers … or even Your Competition

5. Managing Brand Perception

6. Managing Brand Perceptions ? The 10 Drivers of Perception:

7. Managing Brand Perceptions ? The Benefits of using the 10 Perception Drivers: Indentifies the absolute unique brand personality Defines exactly how people perceive the brand Defines exactly how people behave around the brand Defines the strength of Brand Clarity Defines how people identify with your brand What they associate with your brand Tap into powerful ancient cultural myths and stories Uses subconscious anchors and links Provides the illogical emotional connection

8. Applying the 10 perception Drivers

9. What are the 10 Perception Drivers ? The 10 Perception drivers are based on ten fundamental archetypes. We call them Brand Archetypes. They operate in the collective psyche of humankind which can be used to modify choices and behaviours in relation to a brand. These are: Identity Feeling Thought Attraction Energy Growth Structure Freedom Spirit Renewal Individuality & Uniqueness Emotional Impact Communication Social Intelligence Competitiveness Growth & Expansiveness Authority & Respect Innovation & Unconventionality Intuition & Inspiration Power & Transformation [who we are] [the emotional impact of our brand] [how and what we really communicate] [the impact of the brand on relationships] [how does the brand motivate action] [the capacity to expand] [what we are respected for] [how our brand generates excitement] [how our brand inspires] [power of our brand to change people’s lives]

10. An archetype is not created They are part of the human collective unconsciousness and reflect a subconscious way of doing things An Archetype is not isolated, static elements of consciousness They provide meaning and direction to how we behave and how we express ourselves a day-to-day basis They are fundamental to everything that we do A Brand Archetype is not a rational construct They are universal in nature and behave in non-linear ways that lacks reason and logic Archetypes and archetypal interactions are double edged swords They are both positive and negative What are Brand Archetypes

11. Using Brand and The Archetypes Internal Brand Alignment Cultural Alignment Performance Management Operational Effectiveness Customer Insight Competitive Analysis Industry Analysis CRM Strategies Communication Executive Vision Strategic Alignment Brand Positioning Portfolio Management The following applications of this process include case studies that highlight some of these applications to provide an insight into the process Application Focus

12. Using Brand and The Archetypes Executive Vision Strategic Alignment Brand Positioning Portfolio Management Case Study One: Executive & Management are not strategically aligned

13. Using Brand and The Archetypes Executive Vision Strategic Alignment Brand Positioning Portfolio Management Case Study One: Executive Vision and Strategic Direction Executive and Management have a different vision and overall positioning of the company The Management have reversed the importance of the two dominant archetypes and bring two in additional archetypes into the mix The management understanding of the strategy is causing conflict in the customer base through inconsistent delivery Part of this confusion lies in a poorly structured products portfolio and the development of new products and services There is a lack of understanding of the customer and what the customer needs are

14. Using Brand and The Archetypes Customer Insight Competitive Analysis Industry Analysis CRM Strategies Communication Case Study Two : External Alignment

15. Energy and competitiveness: given the energetic, athletic, competitive nature of the brand this is not very surprising this is unlikely to change in into the full going forward this is very likely a very dominant position all brands in this category key associations of this archetype are dynamism, action, and drive people are enthusiastic about the brand and associate the qualities of courage and enterprise it has a passionate and energetic projection it is seen as highly competitive among equivalent brands the negative associations on this brand archetype are: friction, anger and aggression Identity, individuality and uniqueness: the brand is perceived as a unique, stand alone entity. its identity is recognizable in itself -- like MacDonalds. If MacDonalds did nothing other than sustain of the name and symbol, this would be sufficient. Similarly with SECR. Its identity carries much of the projection. the iconography and the name carry all the weight. at a non-conscious level, the name and symbolism create sparks. this identity embodies messages of health and vitality as a brand. have confidence in the brands longer term survival. They do not see it as a fly-by-night flash-in-the-pan unstable arrangement. Using Brand and The Archetypes Case Study Two: Customer Alignment Current Brand Positioning: Brand clarity 42%

16. Using Brand and The Archetypes Customer Insight Competitive Analysis Industry Analysis CRM Strategies Communication The source of brand confusion is due to the confusion in the growth, freedom, spirit, renewal and feelings are all very evenly ranked You need to exploit the synergies between growth and spirit Elevate the Brand to an odyssey of personal growth which culminates in an otherworldly experience; in other words, emphasise the personal and spiritual development dimensions of the brand. Case Study Two: Customer Alignment Identifying the 58% Diffusion and Key Positioning Opportunity External Alignment

17. Using Brand and The Archetypes Customer Insight Competitive Analysis Industry Analysis CRM Strategies Communication Competitive Analysis External Alignment

18. Using Brand and The Archetypes Internal Brand Alignment Cultural Alignment Performance Management Operational Effectiveness Case Study Three: Executive & Staff are not strategically aligned Internal Alignment

19. Using Brand and The Archetypes Case Study Three: No Internal Alignment There is a clear agreement about the brand positioning and strategic direction of the company but ... Staff see the brand as an identity – something that is external to them Exec see brand as the driving force of the business There is complete confusion about what this positioning means and how to implement them between the executive and the staff The exec sell one thing and the staff deliver something else There is strong customer confusion around the brand experience The growth of the company has been restricted this confusion Internal Brand Alignment Cultural Alignment Performance Management Operational Effectiveness Internal Alignment

20. 10 Brand Archetypes

21. 1. Individuality and Uniqueness [Who are we] Exec: > This is a very good result. The core identity of the brand mirrors the dominant archetypes produced by the analysis of the totality of her questionnaire. > Exec has their ducks in a row and know what they are doing. Management : > Communication is in semi-alignment with Exec. > But Innovation & Unconventionality and Growth & Expansiveness have no relation whatsoever to anything Exec had to say. > This is disturbing when we consider that there is a 75% agreement factor among the staff. > So in terms of the this question, we can see that the staff are way off base when compared to Exec. Comments: > Which positioning is right and how do we manage the challenges of conflicting energies Communication Competitiveness Innovation & Unconventionality Growth & Expansiveness Authority & Respect 75%

22. 2. Emotional Impact [the emotional impact of our brand] Communication Competitiveness Emotional Impact Growth & Expansiveness Authority & Respect Exec : > Wants people to feel the Communication and Authority Respect archetypes as major players in the brand profile. > The presence of Growth and Expansion in an emotional environment is actually one of the best possible placements for a brand. This energy is responsible for all good things, good fortune, growth, positivity, justice, wealth and so on. You want people to experience this at an emotional level. > To validate what the customers are experiencing we would have to assess the clients. Management: > Weak agreement with Authority and Respect and is the only point of agreement. > With 67% weighted agreement the management are not in strong agreement with each other. > Positive: Emotional Impact was selected as the dominant theme in this question. Shows awareness that people's feelings are very important in the context of the brand. This is further confirmed in question 7. So there is a nice synergy here. Comments: > How important is the emotional impact of your brand given your current target market? > Exec – Low > Management - Medium

23. 3. Communication [how and what we really communicate] 48% Exec: > Consistent with Communication within the communication meme which interacts with the Authority and Respect > The presence of Power & Transformation with Communication reveals that there is (or should be) a fairly high degree of "penetration" in the way the brand communicates. > It also reveals a "depth" to the communication. At another level, it reveals the obvious: the transformational role of the technology. Management: > On the good side, we can see that the answers to the questions almost precisely mirror each other between Exec and the Management. > But at 48% Management have no agreement in the way the brand communicates Comments : > The results on this question are simultaneously both startlingly good and worryingly bad. Good that there is strong agreement. Bad that there is only 48%.

24. 4. Social Intelligence [the impact of the brand on relationships] Communication Power & Transformation Individual & Uniqueness Intuition & Inspiration 60% Exec : > The Communication nature of the company is a point of attraction: Communication, technology, knowledge, expertise, skill, intelligence - all these qualities combine to make the brand attractive. > Power and Transformation interaction Communication suggest the brand is triumphant in its persuasiveness (read mind control, suggestion, ability to influence people's ideas and thoughts). For this reason that people find attractive. (If this is the case, then we would pick this up if we ever did a survey of the clients). Management: > The Managements choice of Intuition and Inspiration suggest that the idealistic, inspirational, uplifting qualities of the brand are what make it attractive to people. This provides an imaginative, fantastical quality. What they are saying is that people find the brand attractive because it is "out of this world". > At 60% the staff are not in strong agreement Comments : > Nice correspondence between Exec and management in that the Individuality and Power and Transformation feature on both lists. This is concerned with issues of power and leadership that the brand attractive and due to its consolidated position in the market. Represents an Ancient Guru Archetype.

25. 5. Competitiveness [How does our brand motivate action] Authority & Respect Power & Transformation Competitiveness Individual & Uniqueness 67% Exec and Management: > Nice coincidence with Power and Transformation and Competitiveness. Wow! This is a very powerful combination. It is basically saying that the company is Superman in the competitive arena (no competition?) > This archetypal combination brims with self-confidence. It is almost ruthless. Nice. There is a huge amount of dynamism here. It is a very successful configuration. Everyone knows that they are successful. They see themselves a successful. They are successful. Absolute confidence. Brilliant. Comments: > It is a pity that the agreement factor only comes in at 67%. > Ideally with a powerful archetype like this we should be looking to exploit it with a higher percentage of agreement. As an aggregate, the staff are expressing their level of confidence in the brand and in what they do and the company they belong to. But not everyone is entirely sure of this.

26. 6. Growth and Expansiveness [the capacity of brand growth] Authority & Respect Intuition & Inspiration Communication Innovation & Unconventionality 84% Exec and Management: > Exec nominated this question as one of the top three in terms of importance of defining the brand. > The 84% agreement level is very significant and positive in terms of staff understanding and projecting these qualities. > Everyone is on the same page. > The brand's role in enriching the lives of its customers is identified in terms of the Innovation and Unconventionality archetype: innovativeness, revolutionary transformation, cutting edge technology, etc. > The Authority and Respect is the archetype of form and structure and authority. Lives are enriched through access to the stable platform which has innate strength. Comments: > The challenge is the Innovation and Unconventionality and Authority and Respect interaction does not combine easily. It is heavy going and awkward. > But in the context of this company it could makes sense: "through control we achieve freedom". > What does not make sense is why this restrictive archetypal combination has emerged on this particular question which relates to growth, enrichment, etc.

27. 7. Authority and Respect [what we are respected for] 63% Communication Competitiveness Innovation & Unconventionality Emotional Impact Growth & Expansiveness Exec : > The Emotional Impact is highly significant. This brand wants people to feel safe and secure -- relates to authority, discipline, structure, leadership, stability. > Exec's archetypal interaction is correlated with "fierce protection" of the child by the mother. Competitiveness is one Exec's top choices and implies the brand is authoritative and in control through the dynamism and competitiveness of the company. Management: > Exec and the management are in agreement with the Emotional Impact in this meme. > Shows a strong maternal (paternalistic), nurturing energy. > The other archetypes are to low to have an impact on this brand meme. Comments: >The 63% management agreement is too low for one of the most important questions there really should be a higher level of consensus among the staff. The lower levels are: Growth and Expansiveness, Competitiveness, Individuality and Uniqueness and Innovation and Unconventionality Individual & Uniqueness

28. 8. Innovation and Unconventionality [how our brand generates excitement] 64% Communication Authority & Respect Competitiveness Emotional Impact Exec and Management : > Exec and Management agreement on the Communication and Competitiveness interaction. >This is a combination that connects very powerfully with quick wittedness and a high degree of intelligence. It is also a "get things done" combination. It is an archetype that represents the implementation of strategies and plans. > Positive: relates to skill, practicality, forceful communication, an impressive ability to act and when expressed is a great force for success. > Negative: interpersonal verbal conflict, nervousness to a pathological extreme which results in outbursts - in the corporate contexts these outbursts would relate to systemic failures. Becoming embroiled in controversies, disputes and lawsuits Comments: > With an agreement factor or 64%, there appears to be room for improvement here.

29. 9. Intuition and Inspiration [how our brand inspires] 62% Communication Individual & Uniqueness Authority & Respect Emotional Impact Exec : > One of Exec's top three. The dominant archetypes are again expressed through this meme. >The implication is that somehow people are uplifted and inspired through the diligence, discipline and practicality associated with the brand and therefore with the company. Management: > Are in agreement with Exec Comments: > If Exec is serious about the importance of this question, and about projecting these particular attributes and values, then the managements 62% agreement needs to be higher.

30. 10. Power and Transformation [power of our brand to change people lives] 75% Communication Intuition & Inspiration Authority & Respect Innovation & Unconventionality Exec and Management: > Good result in terms of the agreement between Exec and the staff. There is a strong agreement. > And at 75%, a very good consensus among the staff. Enough said. Comments > This is one of two questions where the Management agree with Exec (other is communication) but it is not a strong meme.

31. “ A company's primary responsibility is to serve its customers. Profit is not the primary goal, but rather an essential condition for the company's continued existence.” Peter Drucker