Bioethics - Case Studies on
Autonomy and Decision Making
Patient’s Autonomy
Physician provides all relevant information to
patient about his medical condition taking into
consideration the risks and benefits of a
proposed treatment, the availability of alternative
treatments including ‘no treatment option’ to
make him able to take a learned decision about it
Patient’s Autonomy
To respect patient’s decision about medical
care of their without putting any undue
influence/pressure by their health care
provider
Patient’s Autonomy
Paternalism is an outdated concept- where the physicians
used to take decision on the behalf of patients without due
regard to their autonomy.
The best way is to provide all the relevant information to
patients and encourage them to participate actively in
deciding the course of action needed. It not only increases
compliance of treatment by patients, produces better
treatment outcomes and reduces chances of litigations.
Consent
 Definition-
As per S. 13 of Indian Contract Act, Consent
is ‘when two or more persons agree upon the
same thing in the same sense’
 Must not examine a patient without consent
 When a patient visits a doctor for treatment or advise,
consent is implied. ‘Implied’ means that it is not
stated but it is legally effective. It is limited to general
physical examination including inspection, palpation,
percussion and auscultation
 For anything beyond, consent for that specific
examination/procedure/treatment must be taken,
preferably in writing
 If consent is being taken orally, it must be witnessed
 Special care must be taken by male doctors
when examining a female patient (eg: A surgeon
doing breast examination for a possible
surgery). A female nurse/chaperone should be
present.
 Examination of patient without consent is
considered as an assault
Components of consent
 1. Clear, i.e., in unambiguous words
 2. Direct- directly conveyed to doctor without any intermediate
 3. Free- without any fear or undue influence
 4. Informed-Patient is made aware of all the relevant information
about treatment including not taking any treatment
 5. Intelligent- The patient has clear understanding of implications
of treatment
 6. Personal- Doctor should not convey to others what the patient
has consented
 7. Voluntary- of his own accord
Exceptions
 An arrested person may be examined at the
request of police without consent using
reasonable force if such an examination is
likely to provide information as the
commission of an offence
 A person may be examined/treated without
consent when there is threat to his life and
he is not in a position to express consent
Informed Refusal
 A person, who is in sound state of mind, has the
right to refuse any treatment of a medical
condition even if such a decision puts his
health/life in danger.
 The patients may opt for DO NOT RESUSITATE
(D.N.R.) or Withdrawal of Life
Support(WoLS) ,i.e., patient denies treatment
all together or they do not wish for any
aggressive measures to be taken when they are
critically ill or injured to save their lives.
 If doctor is aware of such a decision, it
must be respected. However, it is always
advisable to ask patients as their minds
may have been changed.
 Patient’s DNR/WoLS wish may be due to
any undue fear of treatment, any
misconception about a treatment.
 The doctor should allay such fears and
encourage patient to get himself treated and
also by briefing him about the consequences of
not taking any treatment, etc. Undue pressure
should be avoided. But the final decision is of
the patient, NOT of the physician.
 ALL informed refusal cases must be properly
documented in details to prevent legal problems
at a later stage
THANK YOU

Bioethics- Case study on Autonomy and Decision making in medicine

  • 1.
    Bioethics - CaseStudies on Autonomy and Decision Making
  • 2.
    Patient’s Autonomy Physician provides allrelevant information to patient about his medical condition taking into consideration the risks and benefits of a proposed treatment, the availability of alternative treatments including ‘no treatment option’ to make him able to take a learned decision about it
  • 3.
    Patient’s Autonomy To respect patient’sdecision about medical care of their without putting any undue influence/pressure by their health care provider
  • 4.
    Patient’s Autonomy Paternalism is anoutdated concept- where the physicians used to take decision on the behalf of patients without due regard to their autonomy. The best way is to provide all the relevant information to patients and encourage them to participate actively in deciding the course of action needed. It not only increases compliance of treatment by patients, produces better treatment outcomes and reduces chances of litigations.
  • 5.
    Consent  Definition- As perS. 13 of Indian Contract Act, Consent is ‘when two or more persons agree upon the same thing in the same sense’  Must not examine a patient without consent
  • 6.
     When apatient visits a doctor for treatment or advise, consent is implied. ‘Implied’ means that it is not stated but it is legally effective. It is limited to general physical examination including inspection, palpation, percussion and auscultation  For anything beyond, consent for that specific examination/procedure/treatment must be taken, preferably in writing  If consent is being taken orally, it must be witnessed
  • 7.
     Special caremust be taken by male doctors when examining a female patient (eg: A surgeon doing breast examination for a possible surgery). A female nurse/chaperone should be present.  Examination of patient without consent is considered as an assault
  • 8.
    Components of consent 1. Clear, i.e., in unambiguous words  2. Direct- directly conveyed to doctor without any intermediate  3. Free- without any fear or undue influence  4. Informed-Patient is made aware of all the relevant information about treatment including not taking any treatment  5. Intelligent- The patient has clear understanding of implications of treatment  6. Personal- Doctor should not convey to others what the patient has consented  7. Voluntary- of his own accord
  • 9.
    Exceptions  An arrestedperson may be examined at the request of police without consent using reasonable force if such an examination is likely to provide information as the commission of an offence  A person may be examined/treated without consent when there is threat to his life and he is not in a position to express consent
  • 10.
    Informed Refusal  Aperson, who is in sound state of mind, has the right to refuse any treatment of a medical condition even if such a decision puts his health/life in danger.  The patients may opt for DO NOT RESUSITATE (D.N.R.) or Withdrawal of Life Support(WoLS) ,i.e., patient denies treatment all together or they do not wish for any aggressive measures to be taken when they are critically ill or injured to save their lives.
  • 11.
     If doctoris aware of such a decision, it must be respected. However, it is always advisable to ask patients as their minds may have been changed.  Patient’s DNR/WoLS wish may be due to any undue fear of treatment, any misconception about a treatment.
  • 12.
     The doctorshould allay such fears and encourage patient to get himself treated and also by briefing him about the consequences of not taking any treatment, etc. Undue pressure should be avoided. But the final decision is of the patient, NOT of the physician.  ALL informed refusal cases must be properly documented in details to prevent legal problems at a later stage
  • 13.