This document discusses the methodological challenges of researching a pilot Bachelor of Education program in Scotland. It notes that the program was designed based on principles of evidence-driven socio-constructivism but faced internal contradictions between those principles and standards-based approaches. It also discusses tensions between the researcher's role as an outside observer versus a participating insider, and between technical rationalist models of research preferred by policymakers versus more dialogical research approaches. Lessons learned include the need for open discussion of practices and understandings, collaborative use of data to align values rather than evaluate truth claims, and creating collective research narratives.