The document outlines a grading rubric for evaluating submissions on clarity, completeness, readability, and organization across various categories. It details specific criteria for grading written responses, including topic definition, sentence structure, and integration of notes. Additionally, feedback on check writing errors highlights common mistakes such as incorrect date formatting and capitalization issues.

1. Topic/Objective: Name:
Class/Period:
Date:
Essential Question:
Questions: Notes:
Summary:
7/8: Topic filled in. Clearly defined
5/6: Topic filled in. Well defined
3/4: Topic abbreviated/somewhat defined
1/2: Topic unclear/poorly defined
0: No topic listed
7/8: All info provided. Easy to read
5/6: All/most info provided. Readability issue
3/4: Most/some info provided. Readability issue
1/2: Mostly missing info. Readability issue
0: Not filled in
7/8:Fullsentenceused.Cleartoread
5/6:Fullsentence.Minor“English”issue
3/4:Incompletesentence.“English”issue
1/2:Incomplete.Major“English”issue
0:Incomplete.Noinformation
7/8: Clear & complete copy of source information. Readable. Organized.
5/6: Complete copy of source information. Readable and/or Mostly organized.
3/4: Mostly complete copy of source information. Mostly readable and/ organized
1/2: Inaccurate copy of source information. Readability and organization issues
0: No information written down/information in Notes section
7/8: Clear, complete, informative response. Readable. Organized.
5/6: Mostly complete response. Readable. Mostly organized.
3/4: Somewhat complete response. Mostly readable &/ organized
1/2: Incomplete response. Readability & organization issues
0: No response
7/8: Summary answers the essential question using information from notes takes in a clear and concise way. Integrated response
5/6: Summary answers the essential question using information from notes taken
3/4: Summary mostly answers essential question. Some information from notes used. Somewhat disjointed
1/2: Summary response barely/does not answer the essential question. Notes barely/poorly used
0: No summary provided
Angela DeHart, 5/2016

2. Check Writing Feedback
Part
#
Part Description Error
1 Date Incorrect No Year
No
comma
Blank
2 Payee
Not capitalize name
properly
Not start writing at
front of line
Not
blanked
out
Scribble
3 Number amount
Not start writing at
front of line
Unreadable Blank
Not match written
amount
4 Written amount
No hyphen Not at front of line No fraction (cents)
Not blanked out
Not match number
amount
Mis-spelled
Wrote “and” Wrote “cents” Wrote below line
Not start in “Caps”
“Caps” in wrong
place
Scribble
5 Memo Blank Incorrect
6 Signature
First name only Initials Blank
Printed Scribble
7 Name Blank Wrong into
8 Check number Out of order
9 Fraction code - - -
10 Bank/Credit Union information - - -
11
Routing/Bank or Credit Union
account number
- - -
- General mistakes
Not written in
blue/black pen
Comma used
incorrectly
Spelling errors
Angela DeHart, 5/2016