The document contains questions from an audience feedback survey about a magazine cover, contents page, and double page article spread. Respondents were asked about the visual design and layout elements, and whether the content and variety seemed interesting. Some felt the cover design was eye-catching but text was too small, while the contents page and double page spread used colorful pictures and layouts to engage readers.

1. Audience Feedback

2.  Would this front cover catch your eye in a busy shop?
 Would you buy the magazine just looking at the picture and Coverlines on the
front cover?
 What are the negatives and positives of the front cover?
 When you open the contents page, what stands out to you?
 Does the contents page give you enough information for what is in the
magazine?
 Is there enough variety for you within the magazine?
 Would you say the contents page is boring or interesting?
 What are the negatives and positives of the contents page?
 Would the double page spread hold your interest?
 What are your thoughts on the layout of the double page spread?
 Is the article interesting to read?
 What are the negatives and positives of the double page spread?
questions

3.  Yes, the red and blue do
 Yes
 Negatives-writing isn’t big enough positives- current groups, interesting,
eyecatching
 Word contents, pictures, colours
 Yes
 Yes
 Interesting, vibrant
 Negative- text is small positives- well layout
 Yes its eyecatching
 Split the words up. Not blocks
 Yes
 Negatives- too much block writing positives- pictures
answers

4. No
No
Looks professionally done but I don’t like the colour scheme
The pictures
Yes
Yes
Interesting and eyecatching
Interesting spread, nice font
 yes
Eyecatching, pictures make it interesting
Yes, find out a lot
Positives- pictures negatives- last page too many pictures
answers