ASSIGNMENT 3:
EVALUATING EXAMPLE
OF A2 COURSEWORK
By:
Monae
Jodie
Amy
Pamela
Transformation
By Monae & Jodie
What went well
Statistics was used to
give factual evidence to the
audience
These diagrams keep the
audience engaged as they
are not just listening to a
voiceover.
Ken burns is effective as it
reveals more of the image
and gives the audience
information
The ken burns wasn’t too
fast, so the audience were
able to read it clearly.
Statistics
Ken burns
WWW
The cutaway is good
as it shows the views of
transformation in
different countries
This cutaway is very
clear to the audience.
Animations was used to
appeal to the audience
and make them stay
focused
Animations ensure that
the viewer isn't just
looking at boring footage
Cutaway
Animations
EBI
The public interviews
was just people from
the 6form
it would have been
more effective and
realistic if it was real
public interviews such
as people on the street.
During the close up her
head was slightly cut off
was bad framing.
This is hard to control
when an person moves
Public interviews
Better Framing
Assessment foci chart
Sub level Assessment focus
4b - Shooting material appropriate for the task
4b - Including controlled use of camera
4c - Attention to framing
4c - Variety of shot distances
4b - Close attention to Mise-en-scene
4c - Editing so that meaning is apparent
4a - Making selective and appropriate use of shot
transitions
3a - Making selective and appropriate use of captions
4c - Making selective and appropriate use of other
effects
4c - Recording and editing sound with images
Level Mark Percent Grade
4b 36/40 90 A2
Target:
• Pay closer attention to framing
• Use more caption/inter titles
• real public interviews
Transformation
Editing-Perspective- it has the
perspectives the filmmaker is talking
about such as drinking and sex.
Shooting Material-good
use of different locations.
Social actors-
people were
saying their
honest opinion.
WWW
• Overall I think it was really good and most things were
edited correctly. They had clear cutaways to different
soaps and various images.
Different advertisements
to back up their point.
If the talking in this scene
wasn’t so rushed. Also the
music was too loud.
The voiceover
towards the end of
this scene cut off.
There was children in the
background which were
being quite noisy. Also they
could have added more
expert interviews.
EBI
• More of it was really good, however there was some
aspects which were bad. For example at the end of one of
the scenes it cut straight off. Also there could have been
more expert interviews as there wasn’t many.
Pictures such as
this would go past
too quickly.
The music cut of rather
then fading.
Is the Current Media Landscape
Hegemonic or Democratic?
By Pamela
What Went Well
WWW Explanation
Cutaways When the presenter was talking
they had cutaways to make it more
visual
The background music was related
to the topic
It fits into the topic that was shown
and it sets the mood
Montage editing A lot of pictures that was presented
at the beginning of the
documentary
Statistics Which proves their point
Cutaways
Cutaways, is when someone
is presenter is talking, and
would use a cutaway to
show the audience, to make
it more interesting and more
visual.
The cutaway is good, as it keeps
the audience interested and not
bored, just by listening to the
presenter talking, and its more
easier to understand.
Background Music
The background music, is
when there’s music in the
background, whiles having
montage editing at the
beginning
The background music is
good, as it sets the mood, in
this case it was a happy
mood, as it shows how different
people use the media.
Montage Editing
Montage editing is really
good, as it gives an idea
what the documentary is
about. It would give a taste
to the audience whether they
would like it or not
Statistics
Statistics, were also used, this
is really good as it proves their
point to the audience making it
more believable as they are
proving their point
Even Better If
WWW Explanation
The placement where the presenter
was standing
The background can be distracting,
where the audience would focus on
the background rather than the
presenter
The presenter was talking too fast The audience wouldn’t understand
To have more expert interviewing Makes the documentary seem
more realistic
The Placement of the Presenter
The placement of the
presenter is really bad as the
background is distracting, as
the audience might look at the
background rather than the
presenter.
The Presenter was talking too fats
Its important for the presenter to talk slowly for the
audience to understand what the presenter to talk,
otherwise it wouldn’t be clear and wouldn’t understand
what the documentary might be about
More expert Interview
In this documentary, they only have a few interviews, this is
really bad as they didn’t get many peoples opinions on the
media, which means they cannot generalise to a big
population

Assignment 3

  • 1.
    ASSIGNMENT 3: EVALUATING EXAMPLE OFA2 COURSEWORK By: Monae Jodie Amy Pamela
  • 2.
  • 3.
    What went well Statisticswas used to give factual evidence to the audience These diagrams keep the audience engaged as they are not just listening to a voiceover. Ken burns is effective as it reveals more of the image and gives the audience information The ken burns wasn’t too fast, so the audience were able to read it clearly. Statistics Ken burns
  • 4.
    WWW The cutaway isgood as it shows the views of transformation in different countries This cutaway is very clear to the audience. Animations was used to appeal to the audience and make them stay focused Animations ensure that the viewer isn't just looking at boring footage Cutaway Animations
  • 5.
    EBI The public interviews wasjust people from the 6form it would have been more effective and realistic if it was real public interviews such as people on the street. During the close up her head was slightly cut off was bad framing. This is hard to control when an person moves Public interviews Better Framing
  • 6.
    Assessment foci chart Sublevel Assessment focus 4b - Shooting material appropriate for the task 4b - Including controlled use of camera 4c - Attention to framing 4c - Variety of shot distances 4b - Close attention to Mise-en-scene 4c - Editing so that meaning is apparent 4a - Making selective and appropriate use of shot transitions 3a - Making selective and appropriate use of captions 4c - Making selective and appropriate use of other effects 4c - Recording and editing sound with images
  • 7.
    Level Mark PercentGrade 4b 36/40 90 A2 Target: • Pay closer attention to framing • Use more caption/inter titles • real public interviews Transformation
  • 9.
    Editing-Perspective- it hasthe perspectives the filmmaker is talking about such as drinking and sex. Shooting Material-good use of different locations. Social actors- people were saying their honest opinion.
  • 10.
    WWW • Overall Ithink it was really good and most things were edited correctly. They had clear cutaways to different soaps and various images. Different advertisements to back up their point.
  • 11.
    If the talkingin this scene wasn’t so rushed. Also the music was too loud. The voiceover towards the end of this scene cut off. There was children in the background which were being quite noisy. Also they could have added more expert interviews.
  • 12.
    EBI • More ofit was really good, however there was some aspects which were bad. For example at the end of one of the scenes it cut straight off. Also there could have been more expert interviews as there wasn’t many. Pictures such as this would go past too quickly. The music cut of rather then fading.
  • 13.
    Is the CurrentMedia Landscape Hegemonic or Democratic? By Pamela
  • 14.
    What Went Well WWWExplanation Cutaways When the presenter was talking they had cutaways to make it more visual The background music was related to the topic It fits into the topic that was shown and it sets the mood Montage editing A lot of pictures that was presented at the beginning of the documentary Statistics Which proves their point
  • 15.
    Cutaways Cutaways, is whensomeone is presenter is talking, and would use a cutaway to show the audience, to make it more interesting and more visual. The cutaway is good, as it keeps the audience interested and not bored, just by listening to the presenter talking, and its more easier to understand.
  • 16.
    Background Music The backgroundmusic, is when there’s music in the background, whiles having montage editing at the beginning The background music is good, as it sets the mood, in this case it was a happy mood, as it shows how different people use the media.
  • 17.
    Montage Editing Montage editingis really good, as it gives an idea what the documentary is about. It would give a taste to the audience whether they would like it or not
  • 18.
    Statistics Statistics, were alsoused, this is really good as it proves their point to the audience making it more believable as they are proving their point
  • 19.
    Even Better If WWWExplanation The placement where the presenter was standing The background can be distracting, where the audience would focus on the background rather than the presenter The presenter was talking too fast The audience wouldn’t understand To have more expert interviewing Makes the documentary seem more realistic
  • 20.
    The Placement ofthe Presenter The placement of the presenter is really bad as the background is distracting, as the audience might look at the background rather than the presenter.
  • 21.
    The Presenter wastalking too fats Its important for the presenter to talk slowly for the audience to understand what the presenter to talk, otherwise it wouldn’t be clear and wouldn’t understand what the documentary might be about
  • 22.
    More expert Interview Inthis documentary, they only have a few interviews, this is really bad as they didn’t get many peoples opinions on the media, which means they cannot generalise to a big population