This document summarizes a study assessing hospital waste management constraints and related environmental issues in Faisalabad, Pakistan. The study surveyed 6 hospitals, collecting data on waste generation rates, types of waste generated, segregation practices, and disposal methods. On average, hospitals generated 1.12 kg of waste per bed per day, with 12% being infectious waste. Waste segregation and management practices did not fully comply with WHO standards. Analysis found heavy metals like zinc and lead in incinerator ash. Overall, the study found that hospital waste management in Faisalabad is inadequate and does not have an effective policy to address related environmental and health issues.
The document discusses health care waste, including its sources, composition, and risks. It defines health care waste as any waste generated by health care establishments, including hospitals, clinics, laboratories, and homes. Approximately 75-90% is non-hazardous, similar to household waste, while 10-25% is hazardous and can pose health risks if not properly handled. The document then categorizes and describes different types of health care waste and the potential health hazards they pose if mismanaged.
The document discusses healthcare waste management. It begins by defining waste and healthcare waste. It then categorizes healthcare waste based on various classification systems such as the UNEP/SBC/WHO system and the BMW Schedule 2011 in India. It discusses the major sources of healthcare waste such as hospitals, medical centers, laboratories, etc. It also provides estimates of healthcare waste generation rates globally and in different countries including Nepal. The document outlines the objectives of the seminar on healthcare waste management.
Health care waste includes all waste generated during healthcare activities. It is classified into infectious, pathological, chemical, pharmaceutical, radioactive and general waste. Improper management of healthcare waste poses hazards to workers, patients and the environment. Key principles for management include duty of care, polluter pays, precautionary and proximity. Management involves segregation, storage, transportation and treatment which includes incineration and non-burn techniques like burial and chemical disinfection. International agreements like the Basel and Stockholm Conventions aim to minimize hazardous waste and promote environmentally sound management.
This document provides guidelines for waste management in hospitals. It states that 1-2 kg of waste is generated per bed per day in hospitals, of which around 10% is infectious. Proper segregation of waste is key. Waste is categorized into hazardous (infectious and toxic) and non-hazardous waste. The various steps of waste management discussed are segregation, storage, disinfection, transportation, and final disposal through methods like incineration, autoclaving, deep burial, etc. Safety of healthcare workers through proper training and use of protective equipment is emphasized.
Healthcare waste management is important to reduce risks to human health and the environment. Hazardous healthcare waste makes up 10-25% of total healthcare waste and includes infectious, sharps and pathological waste. Proper segregation, storage, transport and treatment of hazardous waste is necessary, with training of all relevant staff. Simple measures like effective containment and safe handling can significantly reduce risks if consistently applied throughout the waste stream. Management in emergencies requires special care for infectious, sharps and pathological waste to minimize public health risks.
This document discusses health care waste management. It defines health care waste as waste produced from health care activities like treatment, diagnosis, and research involving humans or animals. It notes that 75-90% of health care waste is non-hazardous general waste, while 10-15% is hazardous. It provides classifications of health care waste from the WHO and describes the sources, categories of exposed persons, routes of transmission, and methods of controlling hazardous waste like reduction, recycling, treatment, and disposal. It outlines the key steps in developing a health care waste management policy and standard operating procedures for waste generation, segregation, collection, storage, transportation, treatment, and disposal.
Hospital waste presents serious health and environmental hazards if not properly managed. It includes infectious biological waste that can spread diseases. Hospitals must strictly segregate waste into hazardous and non-hazardous categories using designated color-coded containers. Waste must be collected, stored no more than 24 hours at room temperature, and disposed of according to regulations to prevent the transmission of infections and protect public health. Proper training, safety precautions, and worker vaccination are also essential for safely handling hospital waste.
This document provides an overview of medical waste management. It defines different types of medical waste and outlines the key components of an infectious waste management plan, including designation of infectious waste, segregation, packaging, storage, treatment, disposal, and staff training. The objectives are to understand medical waste regulations and how to properly manage infectious waste.
The document discusses health care waste, including its sources, composition, and risks. It defines health care waste as any waste generated by health care establishments, including hospitals, clinics, laboratories, and homes. Approximately 75-90% is non-hazardous, similar to household waste, while 10-25% is hazardous and can pose health risks if not properly handled. The document then categorizes and describes different types of health care waste and the potential health hazards they pose if mismanaged.
The document discusses healthcare waste management. It begins by defining waste and healthcare waste. It then categorizes healthcare waste based on various classification systems such as the UNEP/SBC/WHO system and the BMW Schedule 2011 in India. It discusses the major sources of healthcare waste such as hospitals, medical centers, laboratories, etc. It also provides estimates of healthcare waste generation rates globally and in different countries including Nepal. The document outlines the objectives of the seminar on healthcare waste management.
Health care waste includes all waste generated during healthcare activities. It is classified into infectious, pathological, chemical, pharmaceutical, radioactive and general waste. Improper management of healthcare waste poses hazards to workers, patients and the environment. Key principles for management include duty of care, polluter pays, precautionary and proximity. Management involves segregation, storage, transportation and treatment which includes incineration and non-burn techniques like burial and chemical disinfection. International agreements like the Basel and Stockholm Conventions aim to minimize hazardous waste and promote environmentally sound management.
This document provides guidelines for waste management in hospitals. It states that 1-2 kg of waste is generated per bed per day in hospitals, of which around 10% is infectious. Proper segregation of waste is key. Waste is categorized into hazardous (infectious and toxic) and non-hazardous waste. The various steps of waste management discussed are segregation, storage, disinfection, transportation, and final disposal through methods like incineration, autoclaving, deep burial, etc. Safety of healthcare workers through proper training and use of protective equipment is emphasized.
Healthcare waste management is important to reduce risks to human health and the environment. Hazardous healthcare waste makes up 10-25% of total healthcare waste and includes infectious, sharps and pathological waste. Proper segregation, storage, transport and treatment of hazardous waste is necessary, with training of all relevant staff. Simple measures like effective containment and safe handling can significantly reduce risks if consistently applied throughout the waste stream. Management in emergencies requires special care for infectious, sharps and pathological waste to minimize public health risks.
This document discusses health care waste management. It defines health care waste as waste produced from health care activities like treatment, diagnosis, and research involving humans or animals. It notes that 75-90% of health care waste is non-hazardous general waste, while 10-15% is hazardous. It provides classifications of health care waste from the WHO and describes the sources, categories of exposed persons, routes of transmission, and methods of controlling hazardous waste like reduction, recycling, treatment, and disposal. It outlines the key steps in developing a health care waste management policy and standard operating procedures for waste generation, segregation, collection, storage, transportation, treatment, and disposal.
Hospital waste presents serious health and environmental hazards if not properly managed. It includes infectious biological waste that can spread diseases. Hospitals must strictly segregate waste into hazardous and non-hazardous categories using designated color-coded containers. Waste must be collected, stored no more than 24 hours at room temperature, and disposed of according to regulations to prevent the transmission of infections and protect public health. Proper training, safety precautions, and worker vaccination are also essential for safely handling hospital waste.
This document provides an overview of medical waste management. It defines different types of medical waste and outlines the key components of an infectious waste management plan, including designation of infectious waste, segregation, packaging, storage, treatment, disposal, and staff training. The objectives are to understand medical waste regulations and how to properly manage infectious waste.
This document discusses hospital waste management. It classifies hospital waste into general, pathological, sharps, infectious, chemical, radioactive, pharmaceutical, and genotoxic categories. The main sources of hospital waste are governmental hospitals, private hospitals, nursing homes, doctors' offices, laboratories, and research organizations. Improper management of hospital waste poses infection risks to sanitation workers, medical staff, patients, and visitors from pathogens in waste like HIV, hepatitis viruses, bacteria like Salmonella and Pseudomonas, and parasites like Wuchereria. The key aspects of management are segregation by color-coded bags, collection, storage for less than 6 hours, transportation in sealed containers, and treatment through incineration or autoclaving before safe
The document discusses biomedical waste management in hospitals. It defines different types of healthcare waste and how they are categorized. Approximately 75-90% of healthcare waste is non-hazardous while 10-25% is hazardous. Hazardous waste can include infectious, sharp and chemical waste. The document also discusses waste generation in Nepal, health hazards of improper management, and recommendations for safe management practices like segregation and treatment.
Health Care Waste Management in the Context of Global Health InitiativesUN SPHS
Dr. Christoph Hamelmann and Ignacio Sanchez Diaz presented on healthcare waste management in the context of global health initiatives. They discussed WHO core principles of including adequate budgets for healthcare waste management in health programs and health systems strengthening. Major organizations like GAVI, GEF/UNDP, and responses to Ebola have incorporated healthcare waste management, promoting non-incineration technologies. Rapid assessments found that waste management systems are often lacking in countries receiving funds for HIV/AIDS and other health issues. UNDP is working to develop practical toolkits and standards to support more sustainable healthcare waste practices.
Health care waste management guideline 2014, NepalPrakash Ghimire
This document provides an outline and introduction for a presentation on health care waste management guidelines in Nepal. It discusses the background and objectives of proper health care waste management, including protecting public health and reducing environmental pollution. It covers relevant policies, laws and commitments, ways to categorize health care waste, potential health and environmental impacts, and organizational approaches to waste management. The presentation aims to establish minimum standards for safe and efficient health care waste management in Nepal.
This document is a dissertation submitted by Ishit Bharadwaj for the partial fulfillment of a Master of Architecture degree. It discusses medical waste management. The dissertation covers various topics related to medical waste including types of waste, handling, storage, treatment and disposal methods. It aims to understand current waste management practices and their impacts, and provide recommendations to ensure safety and environmental protection. The document contains an abstract, introduction, literature review, guidelines and conclusions regarding effective medical waste management.
This document discusses biomedical waste management. It defines biomedical waste and explains the major sources which generate such waste like hospitals, nursing homes, and medical colleges. It highlights the need for proper management of hospital waste to prevent the spread of infections and protect community, hospital staff and environment. The document outlines the categories of biomedical waste and their treatment and disposal methods according to the Biomedical Waste Management Rules of 1998 and 2016. It also discusses procedures for disinfection of materials contaminated with blood and body fluids and sterilization of common hospital instruments.
This document outlines hospital waste management practices. It defines hospital waste and classifies hazardous waste. Sources of healthcare waste are identified as well as health hazards. Treatment and disposal technologies are described including incineration, chemical disinfection, and landfill disposal. The document concludes with strategies for hospital waste management and dos and don'ts for safe practices.
This document provides information on dental healthcare waste management. It defines dental waste and classifies it according to infectiousness. The key sources of dental waste are described. Proper waste management involves segregating, storing, transporting and disposing of waste using methods like incineration, wet thermal treatment, chemical disinfection, and landfilling. Special protocols are outlined for managing amalgam waste and heavy metals from dental procedures. Effective dental waste management protects health workers, patients and the environment.
The document discusses guidelines for the safe management of healthcare waste. Key points include:
- Healthcare waste should be segregated and categorized based on infection risk, hazardous properties, and required treatment/disposal. Colour coding is recommended.
- Targets are set to reduce various waste streams, including hazardous, clinical, and packaging waste sent for disposal.
- Recent regulations define more pharmaceutical waste as hazardous and prohibit mixing hazardous and non-hazardous waste. This requires improved waste segregation.
- Additional guidance is provided for waste management in community settings and by pharmacies. Pharmacies may accept certain unwanted medications but have restrictions on handling, storing, transporting and disposing of healthcare waste.
Healthcare waste is such waste which is generated from healthcare facilities, natal care, treatment centers of human and animals. It mainly includes different types of wastes such as sharps, infected syringes, animal and human tissues, drugs and medicines. There are different health risks associated with each type of waste so their management is necessary.
Healthcare waste is of several types and its exposure to public, nurses, cleanliness staff, patients and paramedical staff is from several routes like inhalation, ingestion and skin contact. Once it gets entry into environment it causes several health impacts which may lead to death. There are guidelines and treatment systems in Pakistan for the treatment of healthcare waste but since there is no system of check and balance so condition is worse here. Most of the diseases are caused from the exposure to different types of healthcare waste. So there is need to treat this waste according to WHO guidelines before its final disposal into environment.
Government and associated departments should step in to control the situation. There is serious need of handling of waste specially sharps and syringes, pathological waste and infectious waste.
Hospitals, which are major part of healthcare waste, must be charged if they don’t handle waste properly.
Workers should be given trainings for the awareness of health hazardous of healthcare waste.
There should be strict rules and regulations for the use of protective equipment such as gloves and masks and special dress for the collection and disposal of waste.
Above all, there should be proper system for the segregation, collection, storage and transportation of waste.
Storage area must be separate and away from healthcare facility so that it cannot affect health of workers.
This document discusses hospital waste management. It defines biomedical waste and notes that it is generated during diagnosis, treatment, research or production of biologicals involving humans or animals. Poor waste management can lead to fly breeding from organic waste and injuries from sharps. The document discusses establishing a waste management plan that includes sorting, handling, storage and disposal of biomedical wastes. Hospital waste regulations are governed by the Biomedical Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 1998.
This document discusses health care waste management. It aims to provide an overview of different categories of health care waste, inform about proper waste segregation and disposal, and raise awareness of environmental issues. The categories include general, infectious, pathological, sharps, pharmaceutical, genotoxic, heavy metal, pressurized, and radioactive waste. Guidelines are provided on segregation by color coding, collection, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of each waste type. Proper management can help control diseases and protect workers, communities and the environment.
This document discusses the management of hospital waste. It defines medical waste, regulated medical waste, and infectious waste. Regulated medical waste includes seven categories such as human pathological wastes and sharps. Infectious waste is categorized into seven groups like isolation wastes and contaminated sharps. An infectious waste management plan should include designation of infectious waste, segregation, packaging, storage, treatment, disposal, contingency measures, and staff training. Common treatment methods mentioned are autoclaving, incineration, thermal inactivation, gas/vapor sterilization, chemical disinfection, and sterilization by irradiation. The document emphasizes the importance of a clean environment for public health.
The document discusses biomedical waste management. It begins by noting the rapid increase in hospitals and disposable products has led to more medical waste. Proper waste management is important for quality assurance and public health. The document then covers waste characteristics, legislation around management, categories of waste, health hazards of improper management, and strategies for proper segregation, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of biomedical waste.
The document discusses hospital waste management. It classifies hospital waste into hazardous and non-hazardous categories. Hazardous waste includes infectious waste from medical procedures and laboratories as well as chemical and radioactive waste. Proper segregation, treatment, and disposal of hospital waste is important to prevent health hazards. Key steps include waste minimization, segregation, storage, treatment, transportation, and final disposal.
This document provides guidelines from the Ministry of Health (MOH) on managing hospital waste. It defines healthcare waste and outlines how different types of waste should be disposed of, such as infectious waste in yellow bags, sharp waste in yellow sharp containers, and pathological waste in red bags. The guidelines apply to all medical, nursing, housekeeping, and other non-medical staff. Proper waste disposal and training of healthcare workers is important to prevent the spread of infections.
The document categorizes and defines different types of biomedical and healthcare wastes. It discusses infectious wastes, pathological wastes, sharps, geno-toxic wastes, pharmaceutical wastes, chemical wastes including heavy metals, and pressurized containers. Between 75-80% of healthcare waste is general non-hazardous waste, while the remaining 20% is hazardous or infectious including materials from surgery/autopsies, infectious patients, dialysis, and other contaminated items. Proper management of healthcare waste is important to prevent disease transmission and injury.
The document discusses bio-medical waste management. It defines bio-medical waste and explains the need for proper management to prevent diseases. It outlines various sources of healthcare waste and classes of waste including infectious, pathological, sharp, pharmaceutical, radioactive and more. Proper treatment and disposal methods are important to protect workers and the environment from health hazards. Regulations require waste to be segregated, stored, transported, and treated according to approved methods like incineration, autoclaving, and chemical treatment.
A Review on ways to Manage Biomedical Waste at Different Locations in FaizabadIJMTST Journal
Medicinal waste has as of late turned into an issue of much open worry, due in parts of its extending
mass and unfavorable consequences for human wellbeing. Quick improvement in medicinal innovation the
multiplications of transfer supplies and expanded bundling have added to immense extensions in the
volume of therapeutic waste created. The transfer of biomedical waste has turned into an issue of
developing worry because of its potential natural risks. The study demonstrates that the rate of
biomedical waste age and administration works on applying by doctor's facilities. These practices
incorporates incinerator office was accessible at just a single private nursing home. Appropriate gathering,
treatment and transfer locales did not exist at Faizabad. The waste transfer hone was observed to be very
dangerous and both clinical and non-clinical squanders were observed to be arranged off with no
isolation. The therapeutic staff and different specialists have detailed diverse kind of sickness, for
example, Diarrhea, hepatitis B/C amid study.
This study examined hospital waste management practices at primary health care centers in Fagge Local
Government Area, Kano State, Nigeria. A survey of 132 health professionals found that while sharps waste was
mostly segregated, other wastes were not. Waste was primarily collected by hand and transported within facilities
by wheelbarrow or off-site by cart, with no labeling of infectious materials. Waste was stored openly for 12 hours
without treatment before final disposal, mostly by landfilling, posing health risks. The study revealed deficiencies
in waste segregation, collection, transportation, storage, treatment and disposal practices that could endanger staff,
patients and the community if not addressed.
This document discusses hospital waste management. It classifies hospital waste into general, pathological, sharps, infectious, chemical, radioactive, pharmaceutical, and genotoxic categories. The main sources of hospital waste are governmental hospitals, private hospitals, nursing homes, doctors' offices, laboratories, and research organizations. Improper management of hospital waste poses infection risks to sanitation workers, medical staff, patients, and visitors from pathogens in waste like HIV, hepatitis viruses, bacteria like Salmonella and Pseudomonas, and parasites like Wuchereria. The key aspects of management are segregation by color-coded bags, collection, storage for less than 6 hours, transportation in sealed containers, and treatment through incineration or autoclaving before safe
The document discusses biomedical waste management in hospitals. It defines different types of healthcare waste and how they are categorized. Approximately 75-90% of healthcare waste is non-hazardous while 10-25% is hazardous. Hazardous waste can include infectious, sharp and chemical waste. The document also discusses waste generation in Nepal, health hazards of improper management, and recommendations for safe management practices like segregation and treatment.
Health Care Waste Management in the Context of Global Health InitiativesUN SPHS
Dr. Christoph Hamelmann and Ignacio Sanchez Diaz presented on healthcare waste management in the context of global health initiatives. They discussed WHO core principles of including adequate budgets for healthcare waste management in health programs and health systems strengthening. Major organizations like GAVI, GEF/UNDP, and responses to Ebola have incorporated healthcare waste management, promoting non-incineration technologies. Rapid assessments found that waste management systems are often lacking in countries receiving funds for HIV/AIDS and other health issues. UNDP is working to develop practical toolkits and standards to support more sustainable healthcare waste practices.
Health care waste management guideline 2014, NepalPrakash Ghimire
This document provides an outline and introduction for a presentation on health care waste management guidelines in Nepal. It discusses the background and objectives of proper health care waste management, including protecting public health and reducing environmental pollution. It covers relevant policies, laws and commitments, ways to categorize health care waste, potential health and environmental impacts, and organizational approaches to waste management. The presentation aims to establish minimum standards for safe and efficient health care waste management in Nepal.
This document is a dissertation submitted by Ishit Bharadwaj for the partial fulfillment of a Master of Architecture degree. It discusses medical waste management. The dissertation covers various topics related to medical waste including types of waste, handling, storage, treatment and disposal methods. It aims to understand current waste management practices and their impacts, and provide recommendations to ensure safety and environmental protection. The document contains an abstract, introduction, literature review, guidelines and conclusions regarding effective medical waste management.
This document discusses biomedical waste management. It defines biomedical waste and explains the major sources which generate such waste like hospitals, nursing homes, and medical colleges. It highlights the need for proper management of hospital waste to prevent the spread of infections and protect community, hospital staff and environment. The document outlines the categories of biomedical waste and their treatment and disposal methods according to the Biomedical Waste Management Rules of 1998 and 2016. It also discusses procedures for disinfection of materials contaminated with blood and body fluids and sterilization of common hospital instruments.
This document outlines hospital waste management practices. It defines hospital waste and classifies hazardous waste. Sources of healthcare waste are identified as well as health hazards. Treatment and disposal technologies are described including incineration, chemical disinfection, and landfill disposal. The document concludes with strategies for hospital waste management and dos and don'ts for safe practices.
This document provides information on dental healthcare waste management. It defines dental waste and classifies it according to infectiousness. The key sources of dental waste are described. Proper waste management involves segregating, storing, transporting and disposing of waste using methods like incineration, wet thermal treatment, chemical disinfection, and landfilling. Special protocols are outlined for managing amalgam waste and heavy metals from dental procedures. Effective dental waste management protects health workers, patients and the environment.
The document discusses guidelines for the safe management of healthcare waste. Key points include:
- Healthcare waste should be segregated and categorized based on infection risk, hazardous properties, and required treatment/disposal. Colour coding is recommended.
- Targets are set to reduce various waste streams, including hazardous, clinical, and packaging waste sent for disposal.
- Recent regulations define more pharmaceutical waste as hazardous and prohibit mixing hazardous and non-hazardous waste. This requires improved waste segregation.
- Additional guidance is provided for waste management in community settings and by pharmacies. Pharmacies may accept certain unwanted medications but have restrictions on handling, storing, transporting and disposing of healthcare waste.
Healthcare waste is such waste which is generated from healthcare facilities, natal care, treatment centers of human and animals. It mainly includes different types of wastes such as sharps, infected syringes, animal and human tissues, drugs and medicines. There are different health risks associated with each type of waste so their management is necessary.
Healthcare waste is of several types and its exposure to public, nurses, cleanliness staff, patients and paramedical staff is from several routes like inhalation, ingestion and skin contact. Once it gets entry into environment it causes several health impacts which may lead to death. There are guidelines and treatment systems in Pakistan for the treatment of healthcare waste but since there is no system of check and balance so condition is worse here. Most of the diseases are caused from the exposure to different types of healthcare waste. So there is need to treat this waste according to WHO guidelines before its final disposal into environment.
Government and associated departments should step in to control the situation. There is serious need of handling of waste specially sharps and syringes, pathological waste and infectious waste.
Hospitals, which are major part of healthcare waste, must be charged if they don’t handle waste properly.
Workers should be given trainings for the awareness of health hazardous of healthcare waste.
There should be strict rules and regulations for the use of protective equipment such as gloves and masks and special dress for the collection and disposal of waste.
Above all, there should be proper system for the segregation, collection, storage and transportation of waste.
Storage area must be separate and away from healthcare facility so that it cannot affect health of workers.
This document discusses hospital waste management. It defines biomedical waste and notes that it is generated during diagnosis, treatment, research or production of biologicals involving humans or animals. Poor waste management can lead to fly breeding from organic waste and injuries from sharps. The document discusses establishing a waste management plan that includes sorting, handling, storage and disposal of biomedical wastes. Hospital waste regulations are governed by the Biomedical Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 1998.
This document discusses health care waste management. It aims to provide an overview of different categories of health care waste, inform about proper waste segregation and disposal, and raise awareness of environmental issues. The categories include general, infectious, pathological, sharps, pharmaceutical, genotoxic, heavy metal, pressurized, and radioactive waste. Guidelines are provided on segregation by color coding, collection, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of each waste type. Proper management can help control diseases and protect workers, communities and the environment.
This document discusses the management of hospital waste. It defines medical waste, regulated medical waste, and infectious waste. Regulated medical waste includes seven categories such as human pathological wastes and sharps. Infectious waste is categorized into seven groups like isolation wastes and contaminated sharps. An infectious waste management plan should include designation of infectious waste, segregation, packaging, storage, treatment, disposal, contingency measures, and staff training. Common treatment methods mentioned are autoclaving, incineration, thermal inactivation, gas/vapor sterilization, chemical disinfection, and sterilization by irradiation. The document emphasizes the importance of a clean environment for public health.
The document discusses biomedical waste management. It begins by noting the rapid increase in hospitals and disposable products has led to more medical waste. Proper waste management is important for quality assurance and public health. The document then covers waste characteristics, legislation around management, categories of waste, health hazards of improper management, and strategies for proper segregation, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of biomedical waste.
The document discusses hospital waste management. It classifies hospital waste into hazardous and non-hazardous categories. Hazardous waste includes infectious waste from medical procedures and laboratories as well as chemical and radioactive waste. Proper segregation, treatment, and disposal of hospital waste is important to prevent health hazards. Key steps include waste minimization, segregation, storage, treatment, transportation, and final disposal.
This document provides guidelines from the Ministry of Health (MOH) on managing hospital waste. It defines healthcare waste and outlines how different types of waste should be disposed of, such as infectious waste in yellow bags, sharp waste in yellow sharp containers, and pathological waste in red bags. The guidelines apply to all medical, nursing, housekeeping, and other non-medical staff. Proper waste disposal and training of healthcare workers is important to prevent the spread of infections.
The document categorizes and defines different types of biomedical and healthcare wastes. It discusses infectious wastes, pathological wastes, sharps, geno-toxic wastes, pharmaceutical wastes, chemical wastes including heavy metals, and pressurized containers. Between 75-80% of healthcare waste is general non-hazardous waste, while the remaining 20% is hazardous or infectious including materials from surgery/autopsies, infectious patients, dialysis, and other contaminated items. Proper management of healthcare waste is important to prevent disease transmission and injury.
The document discusses bio-medical waste management. It defines bio-medical waste and explains the need for proper management to prevent diseases. It outlines various sources of healthcare waste and classes of waste including infectious, pathological, sharp, pharmaceutical, radioactive and more. Proper treatment and disposal methods are important to protect workers and the environment from health hazards. Regulations require waste to be segregated, stored, transported, and treated according to approved methods like incineration, autoclaving, and chemical treatment.
A Review on ways to Manage Biomedical Waste at Different Locations in FaizabadIJMTST Journal
Medicinal waste has as of late turned into an issue of much open worry, due in parts of its extending
mass and unfavorable consequences for human wellbeing. Quick improvement in medicinal innovation the
multiplications of transfer supplies and expanded bundling have added to immense extensions in the
volume of therapeutic waste created. The transfer of biomedical waste has turned into an issue of
developing worry because of its potential natural risks. The study demonstrates that the rate of
biomedical waste age and administration works on applying by doctor's facilities. These practices
incorporates incinerator office was accessible at just a single private nursing home. Appropriate gathering,
treatment and transfer locales did not exist at Faizabad. The waste transfer hone was observed to be very
dangerous and both clinical and non-clinical squanders were observed to be arranged off with no
isolation. The therapeutic staff and different specialists have detailed diverse kind of sickness, for
example, Diarrhea, hepatitis B/C amid study.
This study examined hospital waste management practices at primary health care centers in Fagge Local
Government Area, Kano State, Nigeria. A survey of 132 health professionals found that while sharps waste was
mostly segregated, other wastes were not. Waste was primarily collected by hand and transported within facilities
by wheelbarrow or off-site by cart, with no labeling of infectious materials. Waste was stored openly for 12 hours
without treatment before final disposal, mostly by landfilling, posing health risks. The study revealed deficiencies
in waste segregation, collection, transportation, storage, treatment and disposal practices that could endanger staff,
patients and the community if not addressed.
International Journal of Engineering Research and DevelopmentIJERD Editor
Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering,
Information Engineering and Technology,
Mechanical, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,
Automation and Mechatronics Engineering,
Material and Chemical Engineering,
Civil and Architecture Engineering,
Biotechnology and Bio Engineering,
Environmental Engineering,
Petroleum and Mining Engineering,
Marine and Agriculture engineering,
Aerospace Engineering.
This document discusses clinical waste management. It provides definitions of clinical waste and its components. Clinical waste includes human tissues, sharps, medicines, and other waste from healthcare facilities that poses health and safety risks. The document discusses the sources and classification of clinical waste. It also outlines the risks of improper handling, including potential exposure to pathogens. Methods of treatment and disposal are also examined.
This document summarizes a study of hospital waste management practices in Pakistan. The study examined practices at two major hospitals in Rawalpindi and Islamabad. It found that while hygiene within the hospitals was generally good, proper waste segregation, staff training, and transportation and disposal practices did not meet national or international standards. Waste was not consistently separated by type or color-coded properly. Staff also lacked sufficient training and protection handling waste. Neither hospital had their own waste treatment capabilities like incineration. Overall, the study concluded hospital waste management practices in the examined hospitals were insufficient and not aligned with applicable standards.
This document summarizes a study of hospital waste management practices in Pakistan. The study examined practices at one public and one private hospital in Rawalpindi and Islamabad. It found that while hygiene within the hospitals was generally good, proper waste segregation, staff training, and transportation and disposal practices did not meet national or international standards. Waste was not consistently separated by type or color-coded properly. Staff also lacked sufficient training and protection handling waste. Neither hospital had adequate on-site treatment, instead transporting waste untreated. The study concluded that while laws and standards exist, implementation of proper hospital waste management practices is lacking.
This document summarizes a study on biomedical waste management practices in Varanasi City, India. It finds that about 51% of hospitals, nursing homes, and labs are registered with the local pollution control center (CPC) for waste treatment, while 49% are not involved. Similarly, biomedical waste from around 56% of total hospital beds is being treated, while 44% is not. The CPC plays a key role in waste disposal, but more facilities could cooperate to better manage waste. Tables provide details on facilities with the most and fewest beds, highest and lowest paying facilities to the CPC, and non-registered members with the most beds. Overall, biomedical waste is being properly managed, but greater
Impact of Biomedical Waste on City Environment :Case Study of Pune India.IOSR Journals
Indian cities are facing problem of Biomedical waste management in the wake of urban development. The number of healthcare facilities is increasing day by day resulting in large-scale generation of bio medical waste. It has been observed that inadequate disposal of biomedical waste is creating highly unhygienic environment and posing serious heath threat for inhabitants. Present paper discusses the issue of biomedical waste management from a wider perspective with special emphasis on chemical waste which is one of the most hazardous wastes in present context. Various types of biomedical waste with reference to generation, handling and disposal practices are presented. It includes study and analysis of the parameters which affect the quality of environment to explore their impact on city environments. The current practices of handling such waste is presented based on a study conducted in city of Pune, which is the second largest city in the state of Maharashtra, India. It is aimed to put forth the importance of adequate handling and treatment of biomedical waste with reference to healthy and hygienic living environment for inhabitants to live in.
The document summarizes the management of medical waste in the United States and United Kingdom. It begins by defining medical waste according to the World Health Organization. It then discusses the generation, characterization, transportation, treatment and disposal of medical waste in each country. In the US, the key legislation governing medical waste includes the Medical Waste Tracking Act and EPA regulations. Treatment methods include incineration, autoclaving, and chemical treatment. The UK categorizes waste as hazardous or non-hazardous, with non-hazardous waste further divided into clinical and non-clinical waste. Both countries require waste minimization, segregation, transportation to approved facilities, and final treatment or disposal.
Hospital hazardous waste management practices in Punjab, PakistanAsadullah Khan
The document discusses hospital hazardous waste management practices in Punjab, Pakistan. It begins by defining hospital waste and its classification into hazardous and non-hazardous categories. It then estimates the daily generation of hospital waste in Punjab at 0.65kg per bed and notes the most common hazardous wastes include sharps and infectious materials. The document also characterizes the composition of waste, which largely consists of plastics, glass, and cotton/dressings. Current disposal practices are discussed, including incineration as the primary treatment option. The document concludes there is a need for improved enforcement of waste management guidelines, education, and alternative technologies tailored for developing countries.
Abstract— This is a review paper which is prepared from the surveys of hospitals and research studies. Hospital waste management in the world is a strict discipline and does occupy a serious place in the management of health care sector. The management of hospital remaining requires its removal and disposal from the health care establishments as hygienically and economically as possible by methods that all stages minimizes the risk to public health and to environment. Health care waste can be dangerous, if not done properly. Poor management of healthcare waste exposes health labors, waste handlers, and the community to the toxic effects of wastes generated from health activity. The disposal of these wastes could also lead to environmental problems. This article intends to describe various health care wastes and its controlling, as creating good practices for proper handling and disposal of health care waste is an important part of the health care delivery system. The aim of this paper is to highlight the present condition of medical waste and a review on scientific method of hospital waste management.
Toxicology is the study of poisons and their effects. It includes the study of adverse drug effects and detection, prevention, and treatment of poisonings. Toxicology has several branches including toxicogenomics, chemical toxicology, environmental toxicology, medical toxicology, forensic toxicology, and aquatic toxicology. Toxicovigilance actively monitors toxic risks in communities and evaluates measures to reduce them through surveillance of poisoning cases, investigations, and risk communication. Examples of toxicovigilance activities include identifying 1,2-dichloroethane exposures in agarbatti workers and benzene exposures in diamond workers.
The document discusses the healthcare sector in India and issues related to biomedical waste management. It provides the following key points:
1) The healthcare sector in India is growing rapidly and expected to record a CAGR of 17% between 2008-2020. However, this growth is generating large amounts of biomedical waste.
2) Biomedical waste includes infectious waste from healthcare facilities like human tissues and fluids, as well as hazardous materials like chemicals and radioactive substances.
3) Improper management of biomedical waste poses serious health and environmental risks as it can spread infectious diseases. About 50-55% of biomedical waste in India is currently treated according to regulations.
International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) is an open access online peer reviewed international journal that publishes research and review articles in the fields of Computer Science, Neural Networks, Electrical Engineering, Software Engineering, Information Technology, Mechanical Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Plastic Engineering, Food Technology, Textile Engineering, Nano Technology & science, Power Electronics, Electronics & Communication Engineering, Computational mathematics, Image processing, Civil Engineering, Structural Engineering, Environmental Engineering, VLSI Testing & Low Power VLSI Design etc.
The document discusses health care waste management. It defines health care waste as waste generated by health care establishments. Approximately 80% is general waste while 20% is hazardous, which can be infectious, toxic, or radioactive. Key risks of improper management include infection of health workers and the public. The document outlines categories of health care waste and proper management practices like waste minimization, segregation and treatment. Segregation into infectious, sharps, pharmaceutical and other waste streams is important for safe disposal.
Determination of medical waste composition in hospitals of Sana'a city, Yemen...Dr. Gawad Alwabr
This document summarizes a study on the composition of medical waste generated in four hospitals in Sana'a City, Yemen. The study found that the average daily waste generated was 5615 kg, with 26% classified as hazardous and 74% as general waste. The average waste generation rates were 3 kg/patient/day and 2.5 kg/bed/day. Analysis of the general waste composition showed the highest portions were food (27%), plastic (22%), and paper/cardboard (22%). The document concludes that about 26% of waste was hazardous and foods, plastics, and paper had the highest contents of general hospital waste.
Sri Lanka lacks proper clinical waste management infrastructure, leading to direct health risks. Hazardous healthcare waste, estimated between 7,662-42,697 kg daily, is currently disposed of along with general waste. This poses risks like contaminated sharps reentering the healthcare system. A World Bank review recommended an autoclave for treatment, but no hospital agreed to host it. Sri Lanka urgently needs a dedicated clinical waste management system to safely dispose of increasing amounts of hazardous healthcare waste as facilities and treatments expand over the coming decades.
This document provides an overview of healthcare waste management presented by Dr. Radhika Mitra. It begins with an introduction to the increasing amounts of waste generated by hospitals and the health risks posed by improper management. The presentation then covers classifications of healthcare waste, sources, composition, hazards, and regulations in India. Specific sections discuss the categories of waste generated in dental settings, treatment and disposal techniques, and the steps needed for proper waste management in dental camps or clinics.
Study Of Knowledge, Attitude And Practices Regarding Biomedical Waste Managem...lsij journal
Background: Biomedical waste is known as the second dangerous waste in the world that needs to be properly managed. Inadequate and improper technique may cause serious health hazard and environmental pollution. The study aimed to determine the status of knowledge, attitude and practices regarding biomedical waste management among healthcare personnel of Bangladesh. Methods: A cross sectional study was carried out in Gazipur Sadar Hospital of Bangladesh. Total 91 randomly selected healthcare personnel including 22 doctors, 45 nurses, 10 attenders and 14 housekeeping staffs were interviewed. Results: The results showed that poor knowledge level among healthcare personnel excluding doctors. Besides, no black colour coding bin was found in the hospital. Regarding practices and attitude related with waste management, housekeeping staffs ignored the standard operating procedures. Conclusion: It can be concluded from the present study that poor levels of knowledge, practices and attitude regarding biomedical waste management in Gazipur, Bangladesh. Lack of adequate knowledge impedes the waste management.
Similar to Assessment of hospital waste management constraints and related environmental issues in Faisalabad, Pakistan (20)
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 InventoryCeline George
In this slide, we'll explore how to set up warehouses and locations in Odoo 17 Inventory. This will help us manage our stock effectively, track inventory levels, and streamline warehouse operations.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold MethodCeline George
Odoo provides an option for creating a module by using a single line command. By using this command the user can make a whole structure of a module. It is very easy for a beginner to make a module. There is no need to make each file manually. This slide will show how to create a module using the scaffold method.
Walmart Business+ and Spark Good for Nonprofits.pdfTechSoup
"Learn about all the ways Walmart supports nonprofit organizations.
You will hear from Liz Willett, the Head of Nonprofits, and hear about what Walmart is doing to help nonprofits, including Walmart Business and Spark Good. Walmart Business+ is a new offer for nonprofits that offers discounts and also streamlines nonprofits order and expense tracking, saving time and money.
The webinar may also give some examples on how nonprofits can best leverage Walmart Business+.
The event will cover the following::
Walmart Business + (https://business.walmart.com/plus) is a new shopping experience for nonprofits, schools, and local business customers that connects an exclusive online shopping experience to stores. Benefits include free delivery and shipping, a 'Spend Analytics” feature, special discounts, deals and tax-exempt shopping.
Special TechSoup offer for a free 180 days membership, and up to $150 in discounts on eligible orders.
Spark Good (walmart.com/sparkgood) is a charitable platform that enables nonprofits to receive donations directly from customers and associates.
Answers about how you can do more with Walmart!"
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRMCeline George
Odoo 17 CRM allows us to track why we lose sales opportunities with "Lost Reasons." This helps analyze our sales process and identify areas for improvement. Here's how to configure lost reasons in Odoo 17 CRM
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
हिंदी वर्णमाला पीपीटी, hindi alphabet PPT presentation, hindi varnamala PPT, Hindi Varnamala pdf, हिंदी स्वर, हिंदी व्यंजन, sikhiye hindi varnmala, dr. mulla adam ali, hindi language and literature, hindi alphabet with drawing, hindi alphabet pdf, hindi varnamala for childrens, hindi language, hindi varnamala practice for kids, https://www.drmullaadamali.com
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptxDenish Jangid
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering
Syllabus
Chapter-1
Introduction to objective, scope and outcome the subject
Chapter 2
Introduction: Scope and Specialization of Civil Engineering, Role of civil Engineer in Society, Impact of infrastructural development on economy of country.
Chapter 3
Surveying: Object Principles & Types of Surveying; Site Plans, Plans & Maps; Scales & Unit of different Measurements.
Linear Measurements: Instruments used. Linear Measurement by Tape, Ranging out Survey Lines and overcoming Obstructions; Measurements on sloping ground; Tape corrections, conventional symbols. Angular Measurements: Instruments used; Introduction to Compass Surveying, Bearings and Longitude & Latitude of a Line, Introduction to total station.
Levelling: Instrument used Object of levelling, Methods of levelling in brief, and Contour maps.
Chapter 4
Buildings: Selection of site for Buildings, Layout of Building Plan, Types of buildings, Plinth area, carpet area, floor space index, Introduction to building byelaws, concept of sun light & ventilation. Components of Buildings & their functions, Basic concept of R.C.C., Introduction to types of foundation
Chapter 5
Transportation: Introduction to Transportation Engineering; Traffic and Road Safety: Types and Characteristics of Various Modes of Transportation; Various Road Traffic Signs, Causes of Accidents and Road Safety Measures.
Chapter 6
Environmental Engineering: Environmental Pollution, Environmental Acts and Regulations, Functional Concepts of Ecology, Basics of Species, Biodiversity, Ecosystem, Hydrological Cycle; Chemical Cycles: Carbon, Nitrogen & Phosphorus; Energy Flow in Ecosystems.
Water Pollution: Water Quality standards, Introduction to Treatment & Disposal of Waste Water. Reuse and Saving of Water, Rain Water Harvesting. Solid Waste Management: Classification of Solid Waste, Collection, Transportation and Disposal of Solid. Recycling of Solid Waste: Energy Recovery, Sanitary Landfill, On-Site Sanitation. Air & Noise Pollution: Primary and Secondary air pollutants, Harmful effects of Air Pollution, Control of Air Pollution. . Noise Pollution Harmful Effects of noise pollution, control of noise pollution, Global warming & Climate Change, Ozone depletion, Greenhouse effect
Text Books:
1. Palancharmy, Basic Civil Engineering, McGraw Hill publishers.
2. Satheesh Gopi, Basic Civil Engineering, Pearson Publishers.
3. Ketki Rangwala Dalal, Essentials of Civil Engineering, Charotar Publishing House.
4. BCP, Surveying volume 1
Leveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit InnovationTechSoup
In this webinar, participants learned how to utilize Generative AI to streamline operations and elevate member engagement. Amazon Web Service experts provided a customer specific use cases and dived into low/no-code tools that are quick and easy to deploy through Amazon Web Service (AWS.)
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docxadhitya5119
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
Reimagining Your Library Space: How to Increase the Vibes in Your Library No ...Diana Rendina
Librarians are leading the way in creating future-ready citizens – now we need to update our spaces to match. In this session, attendees will get inspiration for transforming their library spaces. You’ll learn how to survey students and patrons, create a focus group, and use design thinking to brainstorm ideas for your space. We’ll discuss budget friendly ways to change your space as well as how to find funding. No matter where you’re at, you’ll find ideas for reimagining your space in this session.
Reimagining Your Library Space: How to Increase the Vibes in Your Library No ...
Assessment of hospital waste management constraints and related environmental issues in Faisalabad, Pakistan
1. ISSN 2320-5407
International Journal of Advanced Research (2013), Volume 1, Issue 10, 482-494
Journal homepage:http://www.journalijar.com
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL
OF ADVANCED RESEARCH
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Assessment of hospital waste management constraints and related environmental issues in Faisalabad,
Pakistan
Tahira Yasmeen1*, Faisal Islam1, Shahida Amin1, Shafaqat Ali1, Farhat Abbas1, Razia Virk2, Toseef Majid1
Department of Environmental Sciences, Government College University, AllamaIqbal Road, Faisalabad, 38000,
Pakistan.
2
Departments of Bio Sciences, University of Wah, Quaid Avenue, WahCantt, Pakistan.
1
Manuscript Info
Abstract
Manuscript History:
Received: 15 November 2013
Final Accepted: 30 November 2013
Published Online: December 2013
Key words:
Hospitalwaste,infectiouswaste,incin
erators,
heavymetals,wastegeneration
Hospital waste is one of the biggest problems in developing countries as
most of the generated waste is directly dumped along the municipal waste or
burnt openly, thus polluting the environment. Unfortunately, scarce data is
available on the amounts, characteristics and management of the various
types of wastes that are continuously generated by healthcare units in
Pakistan. In this study, primary data was collected through comprehensive
surveys, including questionnaire form, personal observations, formal and
informal meetings while secondary data was collected from hospital's
records. Average waste generation rate was 1.12 kg day-1 bed-1 and nearly
one sweeper for seven beds. The studied hospitals generate approximately
2.9 tons waste day-1 which contain 12% infectious waste. Heavy metal
analysis of incinerator ash reveals that the Zn and Pb were high among other
metals. The present study showed that hospitals in district Faisalabad do not
have any effective hospital waste management policy.
Copy Right, IJAR, 2013,. All rights reserved.
Introduction
Healthcare system is a basic requirement for wellbeing of mankind and a civilized society cannot do well without
this important and critical sector. A number of facilities are provided by the health care units but a wide range of
health related outputs are also generated side by side that becomes waste after being used (Azagei et al., 2010).
Medical wastes production has been tremendously increased in recent years due to the growing population, quantity,
capacity building of health care facilities and use of disposable medical products (Mohee 2005). Medical waste play
significant role in the intensification and transmission of disease (Tsakona et al., 2007; Chaerul et al., 2008).
According to the WHO (2000) about 21 million hepatitis B, 260,000 HIV and 2 million HIV infections were
reported all over the world due to use of contaminated syringes (Shinee et al., 2008). Moreover, about 4 million kids
and 1.2 million adults die each year across the world due to waste born diseases (Akter 2000).Environmental
nuisance may also arise due to foul odor, flies, cockroaches, rodents and vermin as well as contamination of
underground water tables by untreated medical waste in landfills (Nemathaga et al., 2008). Failure to adopt minimal
standards of hospital waste management not only curtailed the health of society but also enhanced workload of
health care units. In developed countries, good legislation, best technologies and proper guidelines are provided
stating different feasible ways from waste collection to its final safe disposal with minimal risk to environment and
human health (Tudor et al., 2005). Where hazardous and non-hazardous medical wastes are handled and disposed
off together with domestic wastes, thus posing massive health risks to the health of municipal workers directly as
well as to the public and environment indirectly (Silva 2005). Generally, infectious health care waste generated by
hospitals, do not implement presented legislation due to insufficient information and funds therefore incorporate
medical waste management supported by adequate equipment and budget could greatly reduce financial stress and
quantities of waste (Danchaivijitr 2005; Marinkovića 2008). Availability of reliable data and its analysis are the
indispensable necessities for proper management of hospital wastes. Despite the existence of Pakistan Biosafety
Rules 2005 (SRO 2005) neither proper hospital waste management systems have been developed in various health
482
2. ISSN 2320-5407
International Journal of Advanced Research (2013), Volume 1, Issue 10, 482-494
institutions nor are the concerned health professionals aware of the situation resulting therein. Unfortunately, no
appropriate investigations and statistical analyses have been conducted in this regard and no official data about
medical waste is available so far in Pakistan. Gathering of information through proper research, statistical analysis
of the data and establishment of database could help to plan and design suitable strategy for the management of
medical wastes. In view of all above said, this investigation was done in Faisalabad as a first step of series to
evaluate the hospital waste management practices in Pakistan.
Background information
Faisalabad is the is the third largest metropolis in Pakistan, the second largest in the northeast province of Punjab
after Lahore, and a major industrial center in the heart of Pakistan. The city covers an area of approximately 1,280
km2 with the population of about 4,177,246 inhabitants.
There are about 32 big hospitals working in district Faisalabad and divided into three major categories (I)
government hospitals (II) trust hospitals, organized by NGOs and (III) private hospitals. Both general and medical
waste is generated in different hospitals that are usually disposed off in the premises and causing environmental and
health issues due to improper disposal and treatment of the waste, restrained with a variety of potential infectious
and toxic material. Keeping in view the health problem caused by improper management of medical waste, the
current study was designed to assess the hospital solid waste management practices in terms of types of waste and
quantities of waste generated as well as waste handling, disposal and to recommend policy measures based on
results of this study.
Methodology
The six busiest hospital of Faisalabad were surveyed conveniently covering three categories, e.g. government, trust
and private hospitals. Two hospitals were selected randomly from each category. G1 hospital and G2 hospital from
government sector, T1 hospital and T2 from Trust, P1 and P2 hospital from private sector were selected to assess the
medical waste management system in Faisalabad.
Data Collection
The study was based on the review of available information on medical waste, on-site inspection of hospital
premises and disposal sites that relates to their nature, impacts and management techniques. Self-administered
questionnaire and a check-list were designed aiming to get proper information regarding waste collection from point
of generation to proper disposal and to evaluate the exercised waste management practices. The study was carried
out from January-August, 2011. Six parameters of waste management such as waste generation, segregation, sorting,
handling, gathering, transportation and final disposal were focused in this study. Primary data was collected through
interviews with authorities of the hospital, hospital staff and in-charge of waste management unit and compared with
the suggested standard of the WHO for assessment of hospital waste management in this developing country
(Pakistan). Personal observations of the worker in the waste management units of selected hospitals were recorded
to check the compliance of all activities with recommended standards.
Sampling and analysis
In order to determine physical and chemical characteristics, the waste was separated into different categories in
accordance with WHO guidelines (1978). All types of the wastes generated in selected 6 hospitals were weighed on
a daily basis, during the study period (eight months). Different departments of each hospital including Operation
Theatre, Emergency Center, Labour room, Pathology Laboratory, Radiology and different wards including Surgical,
Medical, peads, Gynecology / Obstetrics were observed to collect data for the study. Ten beds each of the above said
wards were marked and observed continuously during study period with three different colored covered bins for
separate waste collection. Red bins were placed for non-sharp infectious waste including surgical dressing, cotton
swabs, blood, body fluid, body parts, pus, sputum, culture of contagious agents and other contaminated waste.
Yellow bins were placed for sharps including needles, subcutaneous needles, razorblade and other blades, knives,
infusion set and broken glass and white bins for all the non- infectious waste, which includes paper, cigarette
packets, cardboard, packing material, leftover food, fruit and garbage etc. Bins were laid by the side of each bed,
lined with a polythene bag. The collected waste was weighed prior to its removal by the concerned staff. The
weighing of waste was done twice a day i.e. in the morning and evening.
Personal visits to the hospitals were made regularly and waste management staff and sanitary workers were
individually interviewed. Personal observations were also made about gathering, sorting, handling, transport and
disposal of medical waste.15 workers and 15 paramedics’ staffs were included for the survey and data collection.
The information given in the questionnaire was counter checked.
483
3. ISSN 2320-5407
International Journal of Advanced Research (2013), Volume 1, Issue 10, 482-494
Results and Discussion
Hospital capacity and occupancy rate
Medical establishments of district Faisalabad fall under trust, Government (public) and private sectors. All the
public sector medical establishments belong to the Ministry of Health. Total number of beds, occupancy rate per
hospital and average occupancy rate in the 6 hospitals of all three sectors are presented in Figs. 1, 2, 3 and 4. The
highest number (1300) of beds with 100% occupancy rate was found in G1 hospital followed by G2 hospitals (700)
with 93% occupancy rate, while the lowest number of beds (100) was recorded in P2 hospital with lowest occupancy
rate (60%). T1 and T2 trust hospitals were found with comparable occupancy rate of 80% and 87%, respectively.
The occupancy rate of our study was much higher than Askarian et al. (2004) study who found occupancy rate of
53% in his 4 month study in 15 hospitals of Iran.
Comparison of manpower involve in waste management
Although G1 hospital is bigger hospital then G2 hospital but there is no significant difference in staff strength
involved in waste management between two hospitals. The relationship between workers of waste management team
of all studied hospitals to the total bed capacity indicates that approximately 1 worker is available for the cleaning of
7 beds. In general, there is approximately 1 sweeper for 5 beds in G1 hospital while in G2 hospital approximately 1
sweeper is serving for 6 beds. On the other hand, in P2, P1, T2 and T1 hospital approximately 1 sweeper is for 10,
15, 13 and 12 beds, respectively.
Waste generation
Waste generation rate of each hospital was a little different from other hospital (Fig. 5). Average waste generation
rate of various hospitals of district Faisalabad was 1.12 kg day-1 bed-1,which included 78% general or non-infectious
waste and 12% infectious waste while composition of generated waste consist of plastic 55%, paper 5% , textile
10% and glass 30%. The observed values in this study are higher than the study done in Saudi Arabia Health Center
in which waste generation rate of 0.8 kg day-1 bed-1 was recorded (Al-Zahrani et al., 2000). In contrast, waste
generation rate in our study was much lower with 4.45 kg day-1 bed-1in Iran (Askarian et al., 2004).The differences
are probably due to socio-economic and cultural conditions, living standard of the patients, availability of temporary
storage facilities and ways of waste categorizing and segregation system (Patwary et al., 2009).Farzadkia et al.
(2009) also observed similar results with average waste generation rate of 2.5 to 3.01 kg bed -1 day-1, which included
85 to 90% of household waste and 10 to 15% of contagious waste. In the hospitals of Ulaanbaatar waste generation
rate was found lower than other countries (Shinee et al., 2008). This result is contradictory to our study that may be
due to the use of different safety measure in hospitals of other countries. However, the average waste generation rate
(1.3 kg patient-1 day-1) as observed by Swalem et al. (2009) is in line to our study. The proportion of general to
infectious waste in our study was different from WHO literature. The difference in waste production (by weight)
was not only observed among different countries but also found in different hospitals within the country (Qdais et
al., 2007). Waste generation rate in various hospitals depends upon a variety of factors such as types of health care
services provided, number of beds, bed occupancy rate, viable social condition of the patients and the general
condition of the region where the hospital is placed. In different regions of world, waste generation kg bed-1 day-1
was reported differently, like in Tanzania average waste production is 0.84 to 5.8 kg bed -1 day-1 (Mato and
Kassenga 1997), Korea 0.14 to 0.49 kg bed -1 day-1 (Jang et al., 2006), Jordan 0.61 kg bed -1 day-1 (Abdulla et al.,
2008). Turkey 2.11 to 3.83 kg bed-1 day-1 (Eker and Bilgili 2011), Bangladesh 0.25 kg bed -1 day-1 (Patwary et al.,
2009a,b), Egypt 0.4 to 1.91 kg bed -1 day-1 (El-Salam 2010), Brazil 0.57 kg bed-1 day-1 (Silva et al., 2005), Greece
0.26 to 0.89 kg bed-1 day-1 (Karagiannidis et al., 2010) and South Africa 0.60 bed -1 day-1 (Nemathaga et al., 2008).
In our study, G1 hospital is one of the big hospitals (1300 beds) in district Faisalabad and generates large quantity
of waste (1750 kg-1 day-1) (Fig. 6). Number of beds in G2 hospital is about 1 times less than G1 hospital and waste
generated by the G2 hospital (740 kg-1 day-1) is greater than G1 hospital. P2 and P1 hospitals add much less waste
however overall there was little difference between hospitals for per bed generation of medical waste. In general,
public hospitals generate large amount of waste, trust hospitals generate medium and waste generation rate of
private hospitals is much less than those of public and trust hospitals. Average waste generation per day per bed and
total waste generated per day in studied hospitals is presented in Fig. 7 whereas, Table 1 represents waste generation
rate in individual wards/operational units of the studied hospitals.
Waste Segregation
In order to formulate proper waste management schemes, it is necessary to have precise data on the medical
waste generation rate (Yong et al., 2009). Separation of medical waste from general waste should be done at the
point of waste production. During interview with the hospital staff it was revealed that separation of hospital wastes
into contagious and non-contagious waste was not done according to reported rules/regulation and standards of
WHO in all categories of hospital (Fig. 8). The hospitals do not properly label their infectious waste with symbol of
484
4. ISSN 2320-5407
International Journal of Advanced Research (2013), Volume 1, Issue 10, 482-494
bio-hazard. Some rules of waste segregation are followed by the G2, G1 and P1 hospital e.g. use of separate color
coded bins for infectious or non- infectious waste to some extent so the isolation of waste is conducted at the point
of waste generation but afterwards all type of waste are deposited at the same place and transported out without
distinction. Same was found in study of Bangladeshi and Egyptian hospitals where the segregation of non-infectious
and infectious waste was done at the site of generation but during their disposal, all the infectious and non-infectious
wastes were mixed together (Hassan et al., 2008; El-Salam 2010). A case study in China disclosed that about 73% of
hospitals segregate its medical waste into different categories (Yong et al., 2009). In Pakistan, public sector
hospitals deal with the common public and most of them are illiterate so they do not usually aware and bother to use
different bins for different types of waste. However, comparatively, the hospital waste management system was
much better among government hospitals in comparison to trust and private hospitals where color code system is not
properly followed for different kinds of wastes. Abdullah et al. (2008) recorded similar findings regarding separation
of various type of medical waste in the hospitals. Rao (2008) also reported that medical waste management was
found better in government hospitals as compared to private hospitals.
Figure 1.
Total numbers of beds in the studied hospitals
Number of beds
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
G1
G2
P2
P1
T2
T1
Name of Hospitals
Figure 2.The occupancy rate (%) recorded during study period (Eight months) in all the hospitals
120%
Occupancy rate
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
G1
G2
P2
P1
T2
T1
Name of Hospitals
485
5. ISSN 2320-5407
International Journal of Advanced Research (2013), Volume 1, Issue 10, 482-494
Figure 3.Variation of the average bed occupancy (%) in Faisalabad by month of the year 2011
Average occupancy rate (%)
95
94
93
92
91
90
89
JAN
FEB
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUG
Months
Figure 4.Percent occupancy rates in different wards of the studied hospitals
100.0%
90.0%
Waste generation
80.0%
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
Gynae/Obstetric
CCU
Emergency
Peads
Medical
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
Surgical
G1
G2
P2
P1
T2
T1
Names of Hospitals
Figure 5.Average waste generation (kg day-1 bed-1) in the studied hospitals
1.6
Waste generation
(kg day -1 bed -1)
1.4
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
G1
G2
T1
T2
Name of Hospitals
P1
P2
486
6. ISSN 2320-5407
International Journal of Advanced Research (2013), Volume 1, Issue 10, 482-494
Figure 6.
Total waste generation (kg day-1) in the studied hospital
1800
Waste generation
(kg day -1)
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
G1
G2
T1
T2
P1
P2
Name of Hospitals
Figure 7.
Pie charts showing the percentage composition (by wt.) of hospital solid waste generation (kg
day-1 ward-1) in the studied hospitals
487
7. ISSN 2320-5407
International Journal of Advanced Research (2013), Volume 1, Issue 10, 482-494
Figure 8.
Percentage of different waste handling processes in the studied hospitals
waste handling (%)
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Sorting
Sharp seperation
special container
for transport
Proper storage
color bag
Handling processes
Figure 9.
Trolleys in use for onsite waste transportation in G1 Hospital
488
8. ISSN 2320-5407
International Journal of Advanced Research (2013), Volume 1, Issue 10, 482-494
Figure 10.
Safety measure profile in the studied hospitals of Faisalabad
3%
10%
Helmets
22%
Mask
Gown/Overal
Safety Shoes
Gloves
32%
Hand Washing
29%
4%
Figure 11.
(a) Storage of hospital waste on road side (b) Collection unit of waste in G2 hospital
Figure 12.
Maximum holding time (days) of waste before disposal
Max.Holding Time (days)
22
18
14
10
6
2
-2
G1
G2
T1
T2
P1
P2
Hospital
489
9. ISSN 2320-5407
International Journal of Advanced Research (2013), Volume 1, Issue 10, 482-494
Medical waste handling, collection and temporary storage
Medical wastes generation as well as collection in the selected hospitals is on daily basis and the waste is transported
from generation point to the temporary collection unit by hospital staff. In G1 and G2 hospitals, onsite transport of
waste from the sites of production to the temporary collection unit is by wheeled trolleys (Fig. 9). These wheel
trolleys are not cleaned properly which may cause infection as flies and other insect may contact with them. In trust
hospitals (T1 and T2) and private hospitals (P1 and P2)onsite transportation of waste is carried out manually and no
wheel trolleys or other carriers for use are available. Moreover, the hospitals do not maintain a record or register for
medical waste disposal. The staff was not fully aware of risk and how to handle it. The working staff of all these
hospitals for handling waste was not found properly dressed for personal protection and it seems that personal
hygiene was compromised during handing of hospital waste. G1 and G2 hospitals only provide polythene gloves and
over-coat/gown to their worker (Fig. 10). No training was given to the staff about proper hand washing and due to
inadequate education; habit of hand washing after each waste handling was not adopted by the workers. Staff
handling medical waste in all studied hospitals does not receive vaccine against hepatitis, tetanus and any other
disease. Improper handling of waste bags was observed in all hospitals and hand washing after taking off gloves was
negligible which show lack of awareness towards handing of infectious waste. Similar findings were reported by
Danchaivijitr et al. (2005). Targeted awareness regarding hand wash practices is urgently needed and use of over-cot
and facemasks for personal protection should be encouraged. Boudar et al. (2006) also observed that properly
defined methods were not being used for various steps of waste management such as handling and disposal of their
hospital wastes, starting from the workers responsible for waste gathering to those who transport the wastes at the
disposal site. The same kinds of results were reported by other researcher Nasima et al. (2002). They found that
hospital workers have no proper understanding of hospital waste management and do not perceive handling or
disposal of medical waste as a risky work.
Therefore it is essential to understand that the deficiency of appropriate equipment for protection, deficient
knowledge concerning the proper usage of tools and deficiency of relevant understanding of the workers can
exposes workers to severe risks. G1 and G2 hospitals in this study, have poor sanitary momentary collection units at
the backyard of the hospitals which is not properly constructed, secured and maintained. The contagious and noninfectious wastes are kept separate in hospital's own temporary collection unit. The wastes are kept in this temporary
collection unit or neighboring area until the time of disposal and off-site transport. On the whole, three collection
points for medical wastes are maintained in G1 hospital whereas; G2 hospital has maintained two points for medical
waste storage (Fig. 11). One small room exists in T2 and T1 for storage of waste. In P1 and P2 hospital, no specific
room was found for temporary storage. In P1 and P2 hospital waste is collected in outside the hospital in metal
drums or in open place and the collection point of waste is not well secured and sanitized.Beforehand, this waste is
gathered by municipal worker for disposal. The scavengers sort the bin to search the valuable things like syringes
and other plastic waste. Later, after final disposal of waste in city dumping site, scavengers were again observed for
sorting the things at dumping sites (Patwary et al., 2011). The situation of ineffective legislation and implementation
of rules in Pakistan can be judged a report of leading TV channel, disclosing that in Lahore, Pakistan, two factories
were sealed by authorities those were involve in the manufacturing of kids feeders, crockery and straws from
recycling of Hospital waste (For video: http://www. facebook.com/ photo.php?v=10200094673
355611).
An astonishing fact emerged in this study was handling of pathological waste without the use of refrigerators. The
pathological waste is stored in plastic bags and placed in the form of heap in storage room or in open area. The
storage rooms are not at isolated area nor are they disinfected daily and poorly ventilated. According to WHO
(2000), there should be special storage rooms in the isolated area of hospital where euro bins or four wheeled bins
must be used to store hospital waste until its off site or on-site disposal. The survey analysis revealed that timing of
temporary storage for waste was varying in different hospitals. The waste was being moved to municipals sites in 1
to 20 days. The maximum waste holding time was about 20 days by the P2 hospital and least time was about 1 day
of G1 hospital (Fig. 12). While the implementation of hospital waste management rules of Pakistan (2005) was
totally avoided, according to which the waste must not be stored for more than 24 hours.
490
10. ISSN 2320-5407
Table 1
International Journal of Advanced Research (2013), Volume 1, Issue 10, 482-494
Medical waste generation (kg day–1) in different operational units of studied hospital of
Faisalabad
Operational Units
Public Sector
G1
G2
Private Sector
P2
P1
Trust Sector
T1
T2
Labour room
Lab
X- ray
Dispensary and Dressing room
OPD
20
6
5
7
4
4
3
1
0.5
1.5
5
0.5
1
0.5
1
Table 2
Waste type
19
6
4
7
4
5
3
1
1
1
2
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
Categories of medical waste collected from tagged beds of the studied hospitals
Examples
Infectious
WHO standard Color
Code
Red
Non infectious
Blue
paper, cigarette packets, cardboard, packing material, leftover
food, fruit and garbage
Sharp
Yellow safety box
needles, subcutaneous needles, razorblade and other blades,
knives, infusion set, broken ampules and vials.
surgical dressing, cotton swabs, blood, body fluid, body parts,
pus, sputum, culture of contagious agents and other
contaminated waste
Table 3 Heavy metals in the incinerator ash of G1 and T2 hospitals
Sampling
Month
March
April
May
June
July
August
Hospital
Cr (µg g–1)
Cu (µg g–1)
Pb (µg g–1)
Ni (µg g–1)
Zn (µg g–1)
G1
T2
G1
T2
G1
T2
G1
T2
G1
T2
G1
T2
0.234
0.457
0.527
0.762
0.961
0.736
0.455
0.332
0.328
0.865
0.451
0.649
0.023
1.046
10.056
9.231
0.563
0.065
1.238
0.5436
0.451
6.640
2.027
0.872
3.469
2.456
2.453
3.634
11.57
1.343
6.366
1.568
1.452
2.578
2.672
1.4467
0.143
0.345
0.493
1.356
3.137
0.014
0.564
0.984
0.034
2.736
1.872
0.567
7.342
5.359
2.466
8.462
6.128
6.342
3.472
13.457
5.341
2.346
11.354
9.522
Off-site Transport and disposal of Medical Waste
In Pakistan approximately 0.8 million tons of hospital waste is produce daily (Anonymous 2012). In Karachi only,
35 tons of hospital waste is dumped in municipals while many hospitals don’t installed incinerators so, direct
burning is the main process of disposal of medical waste (Anonymous 2011).
In our survey, no treatment before transportation of infectious waste was observed in all six hospitals. In G1 and T2
hospitals transportation of the medical waste is not done because these hospitals have their own incinerator for final
disposal of waste. Moreover, G2, T1, and P1 hospitals transport their medical waste to G1 hospital for incineration.
The maximum infectious waste holding time are shown in Fig 12. It was observed that increased waste holding time
was because of expenses of transportation and operating cost of incinerator. Small size of pickups for transportation
of hospital waste is usually used. The wastes are usually heaped and they fall off on the roads during transportation.
491
11. ISSN 2320-5407
International Journal of Advanced Research (2013), Volume 1, Issue 10, 482-494
The wastes are burdened directly into the wagons without putting them first into closed containers. The medical
waste has been loaded by hand and made contact with the floor, thereby increasing the danger of the waste handler
being injected or cut by contaminated hard metals such as blades and needles (Tsakona et al., 2007). The same
wagons were being used for non-infection waste disposal which must increase the contamination of non-infection
waste with pathogenic substance, causing a serious health risk to the workers. Moreover, these wagons are not
labeled with bio-hazardous symbols, not just fix for medical waste transportation, not properly cleaned and
disinfected after transportation. Much of the waste fall on the road during transportation, this is hazardous for the
public and environment. No off site transportation of medical waste was observed in P2 hospital where waste
usually disposed of by burning. Blenkharn (2006) found collection of waste in areas those were easily available to
the community and malfunction due to local individual carts was common. Many hospital waste carts and areas
dedicated to their storage were in a bad condition of restore. Tsakona et al. (2007) also found same kind of
unsuitable gathering and procedures for transport of contagious waste, which were extremely dangerous for the
wellbeing of staff and patients. The present study showed that all the hospitals in district Faisalabad do not have any
policy and plan for managing medical waste. Samwel et al. (2004) also found no clear laws and appropriate policies
in Tanzania associated to medical waste management, compared to other countries. However, in developed countries
the waste management system is much better than developing countries those are suffering from lack of budget,
consciousness and economic crisis.
HeavyMetalsinHospitalIncineratorAsh
Thebasicaimtonotetheparameterwastheinvestigationofheavymetalsconcentrationinincineratedwasteofhospital.Heavy
metalswerefoundforallashsamplesofselectedhospitals.Zinc(Zn)andlead(Pb)werethedominantmetalsfoundamongthesa
mpleswhilecopper(Cu),nickel(Ni)andchromium(Cr)werenotpresentathighconcentrationinash,respectively(Table3).Th
eaverageconcentrationof
Pbinashsamplesrangesfrom1.343to11.57µg
g1MoreovertheconcentrationofZnrangesinashsampleswas2.466to13.457µg
g1Thepresenceofheavymetalsinthehospitalwastemightbefromtheplasticaccessoriesandleadbatteries(Meyersetal.1998).
ThepigmentationofplasticisduetothepresenceofdifferentmetalslikeZn,PbandCretcwhicharedetrimentaltohealth.Theus
eofcoloredplasticinhospitalsofFaisalabadisthemaincauseofthehighconcentrationofabove
saidmetals(Aucottetal.2006).HighamountofleadintheashofhospitalG1mightbeduetothehightemperatureoftheincinerat
orasthePbisvolatilemetalitmaybevaporizedinan
environmentathightemperature.ThistypeofphenomenawasalsoobservedbytheRacho&Jindal(2004).Theincineratorashi
salsodumpedalongthemunicipalwaste(Ilyas2011)asoursurveyrevealedthatworkerthoughtthatitissafetodispose.Butthe
metalcontaminationinashmayleachdowninsoilinrainyseason(Chandleretal.,1997)andmayenterinthewaterwhich
ledtotheundergroundwatercontamination.
Conclusion
On the whole, all the hospitals do not fulfill the WHO recommended standards of waste management in each step
right from collection to disposal. It is due to inadequate knowledge, equipment and improper training of hospital
staff. The main problems of hospitals with respect to the management of medical waste include insufficient
regulations and proper training on the different aspects of gathering, sorting, handling, transportation and disposal of
waste, improper use of colored bags and lack of budget. Due to all these deficiencies the hospitals do not meet the
WHO standards of waste management. We conclude that, there is an urgent need of devising effective waste
management plan for all the hospitals in Faisalabad city. In addition, waste managingstaff of these hospitals must be
given adequate equipment and budget to make them functional and efficient.
Recommendations
From above study we recommend the following key points with respect to the administration of hospital waste in
Pakistan.
1) Before the implementation of waste management strategy the obligation must be given to the concerned
governmental authorities. Ministry of Health along with the ministry of Environment, are the competent authorities
those could cooperate with managements of governmental, non- governmental and private organization to ensure
application of action plan.
2) For effective and sound management of infectious and non-infectious waste, it is necessary to collect information
about the current status of hospitals in term of facilities provided by health care unit, beds capacity, occupancy rate,
waste generation rate and its types, handling segregation transportation, disposal, manpower involve in waste
management process, professional in waste management team, personal protective equipment and there usage. All
492
12. ISSN 2320-5407
International Journal of Advanced Research (2013), Volume 1, Issue 10, 482-494
these collected information will help to develop state of the art plan. For the effective implementation of action plan
legislative cover must be provided to the strategy.
3) Training about the use of personal protective equipment, waste collection and further processing must be given
because in Pakistan these workers (Sweeper and cleaner) are mostly illiterate and have no idea about the nature of
hazardous materials and their impact on health of society.
4) Periodic monitoring and assessment through independent investigating team must be done in order to implement
the action plan properly.
5) For the treatment of hospital waste up to dated scientific methods must be adopted with the passage of time.
Acknowledgement
The valuable suggestions provided by Dr. AduilRashid (Assistant Professor, University of Arid Agriculture,
Rawalpindi Pakistan) are gratefully acknowledged.
References
Abdulla, F., Qdais, H.A. and Rabi, A. (2008): Site investigation on medical waste management practices
in
Northern
Jordan. Waste.Manag. 28: 450-458.
Akter, N (2000). Medical Waste Management: A Review. Asian Institute of Technology, School of Environment,
Resources and Development, Thailand.
Al-Zahrani, M. A., Fakhri, Z. L., Al-Sahnshouri. And Al-Ayed, M. H. (2000): Healthcare risk waste in Saudi
Arabia. Saudi.Medical. J. 21: 245-250.
Anonymous (2012).Hospital waste major threat to health, Pakistan Today newspaper.
http://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2012/05/24/city/islamabad/hospital-waste-majorthreat-tohealth/(accessed January 2013).
Anonymous (2011):Hospital waste disposal: Lawyer asks SHC to review case.The Express
Tribune
newspaper.
<http://tribune.com.pk/story/183624/hospital-waste-disposal- lawyer-asks-shc-to-review-case/>
(accessed
January 2013).
Ananth, A.P., Prashanthini, V. and Visvanathan, C. (2010): Healthcare waste managementin Asia Waste
Manag.
30, 154-161.
Askarian, M., Vakilia, M., Kabirb, G. (2004): Hospital waste survey in private hospitals in fars province,
Iran.
Waste.Manag. 24: 347-352.
AOAC (1990): AOAC official methods of analysis. 15th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington,
Virginia, pp. 84–85.
Aucott, M. (2006): The fate of heavy metals in landfills: a review, Industrial Ecology, Pollution Prevention and the
NY–NJ Harbor. Project of the New York academy of sciences.
Azage, M. and Kumie, A. (2010): Healthcare waste generation and its management system. Health. Develop. 24:
119-126.
Bdour, A., Altrabsheh, B., Hadadin, N. and Al-Shareif. M. (2006): Assessment of medical wastes management
practice: a case study of the northern part of Jordan. Waste.Manag.27, 746–59.
Birpinar, M.E., Bilgili, M.S.andErdoğan, T. (2009): Medical waste management in Turkey: A case
study of
Istanbul. Waste.Manag. 29: 445-8.
Blenkharn, JI. (2007): Standards of clinical waste management in hospitals-A second look. Public Health. 121: 540545.
Blenkharn, J.I. (2006): Standards of clinical waste management in UK hospitals. Hospital.Infection. 62: 300-303.
Chaerul, M., Tanaka, M., Ashok, V. and Shekdar, A.V. (2008): A system dynamics approach for hospital
waste
management. Waste.Manag. 28: 442–449.
Chandler, A.J., Eighmy, T.T., Hartlen, J. and Vehlow, J. (1997): Studies in Environmental Science, Elsevier.
Danchaivijitr, S.Santiprasitkul, S. Pumsuwan, V. Tiersuwan, S. and Naksawas, K. (2005):Problems
in
the
Management of Medical Waste in Thailand .J. Medical. Association. 88:140-144.
Diaz, L.F., Savage, G.M. and Eggerth, L.L. (2005): Alternatives for the treatment and disposal of healthcare wastes
in
developing countries. Waste.Manag. 25: 626-637.
Eker, H.H. and Bilgili, M.S. (2011): Statistical analysis of waste generation in healthcare services: a
case
study. Waste.Manag. Res. 29: 791-796.
El-Salam, M.M.A. (2010): Hospital waste management in El-Beheira Governorate, Egypt. J.
Environ. Manag.
91:
618-629.
Farzadkia, M., Moradi. A., Mohammadi, M.S. andJorfi, S. (2009): Hospital waste management status
in Iran:
a case study in the teaching hospitals of Iran University of Medical Sciences. Waste.Manag. Res. 27: 384-9.
493
13. ISSN 2320-5407
International Journal of Advanced Research (2013), Volume 1, Issue 10, 482-494
Hassan, MM., Ahmed, S.A., Rahman, K.A. and Biswas, T.K. (2008): Pattern of medical waste
management:
Existing scenario in Dhaka City, Bangladesh. BMC.Public.Health. 8: 36.
Ilyas, F. (2011):Govt apathy to proper disposal of hospital waste.Dawn News http://dawn.com/2011/11/10/govtapathy-to-proper-disposal-of-hospital-waste/ (accessed February 2013).
Jang, Y.C., Lee, C., Yoon, O.S. and Kim, H. (2006): Medical waste management in Korea. J.
Environ. Manag.
80: 107-115.
Karagiannidis, A., Papageorgiou, A., Perkoulidis, G., Sanida, G. Samaras, P., 2010. A multicriteria
assessment of
scenarios on thermal processing of infectious hospital wastes: A
case study for Central
Macedonia. Waste Manag. 30, 251-262.
Khattak, F.H. (2009): Hospital waste management in Pakistan. Pak. Med. res. 48: 200- 207.
Lee, K.B., Ellenbecker, M.J. and Eraso, R.M. (2002): Analyses of the recycling potential of medical plastic wastes.
Waste.Manag. 22: 461–470.
Marinkovića, N., Vitaleb, K., Holcerb, N.J., Džakulab, A.andPavićc, T. (2008): Management of hazardous medical
waste in Croatia .Waste. Manag. 28: 1049-1056.
Mato, R.R.A.M. and Kassenga, G.R. (1997): A study on problems of management of medical solid
astes in
Dar-e- Esalaam and their remedial measures. Resour. Conserv.Recycl. 21: 1-16.
Meyers, R.A. (1998): Encyclopedia of Environmental Analysis and Remediation, vol. 2, John
Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.
Mohee, R. (2005): Medical wastes characterization in healthcare institutions in Mauritius. Waste. Manage. 25: 57581.
Morselli, L., Passarini, F. and Bartoli, M. (2002): The environmental fate of heavy metals arising from a medical
solid
waste incineration plant. Waste.Manag. 22, 875-881.
Nasima, A., Zakir, H. and Josif, F. (2002): Hospital waste management and it's probable health effect. Environ.
health. 4: 124-137.
Nemathaga, F., Maringa, S. and Chimuka, L. (2008): Hospital solid waste management practices in Limpopo
Province, South Africa: a case study of two hospitals. Waste Manag.28: 1236- 1245.
Palenik, C.J. and Cumberlander, N.D. (1993): Effects of steam sterilization on contents of sharp containers.
American J. Infect. Cont. 21: 28-33.
Patwary, M.A., O’Hare, W.T., Street, G., Maudood, E.K., Shahadat, H.S. and Sarker, M.H., (2009a). Quantitative
assessment of medical waste generation in the capital city of Bangladesh.
Waste.Manag. 29: 23982403.
Patwary, M.A., O’Hare, W.T. and Sarker, M.H. (2011): An illicit economy: Scavenging and
recycling
of
medical waste. J. Environ. Manag. 92: 2900-2906
Qdais, H.A., Rabi, A. and Abdulla, F. (2007): Characteristics of the medical waste generated at the Jordanian
hospitals. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy. 9:147-52.
Racho, P. and Jindal, R. (2004): Heavy metals in bottom ash from a medical waste incinerator in
Thailand, Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive. Waste.Manag. 8: 31–38.
Shinee, E., Gombojav, E., Nishimura, A., Hamajima. N. and Ito, K. (2008): Healthcare waste
management in
the capital city of Mongolia. Waste.Manag. 28: 435-441.
Silva, C.E., Hoppe, A.E., Ravanello, M.M. and Mello, N. (2005): Medical wastes management in the south of
Brazil. Waste. Manage. 25: 600-6255.
Tsakona, M., Ansgnostopoulou, E. and Gidarakos, E. (2007): Hospital waste management and
toxicity
evaluation: a case study. Waste.Manag. 7: 912-920.
WHO (1978): Methods of Analysis of Sewage Sludge, Solid Wastes and Compost. WHO, CH8600 Du¨ bendorf
(Switzerland).
WHO (2000): In: Rushbrook, P., Chandra, C., Gayton, S. (Eds.), Starting health-care waste
management in
medical institutions. Health-care waste practical information series, No.1.WHO Regional Office for Europe,
European Centre for Environment and Health, Copenhagen.
WHO (2002): Basic Steps in the preparation of health care waste management plans for health
care
establishments. World Health Organization, Amman (WHO-EM/CEH/100/E/L).
Yang, C., Peijun, L., Lupi, C., Yangzhao, S., Diandou, X., Qian, F. and Shasha, F. (2009):
Sustainable
management and measures for healthcare waste in China. Waste.Manag. 29:
1996-2004.
494