Reference List for the presentation by Dr Ann Ooms and Hendrik van der Sluis, Kingston University, at the "Improving Assessment and Feedback Practices in a Technology-Enhanced Teaching and Learning Environment: Theory and Practice" Event, 19th May 2010 at Kingston University. Part of the "Higher Education Academy : Evidence Based Practice Seminar Series 2010"
Assessment & Feedback Literature ReviewMorse Project
Presentation by Dr Ann Ooms and Hendrik van der Sluis, Kingston University, at the "Improving Assessment and Feedback Practices in a Technology-Enhanced Teaching and Learning Environment: Theory and Practice" Event, 19th May 2010 at Kingston University. Part of the "Higher Education Academy : Evidence Based Practice Seminar Series 2010"
The presentation provides an overview of recent literature concerning assessment and feedback
Faculty Adoption of Technologies in Team-Based Learning ClassroomsBradford Wheeler
Wheeler, B., Shih, M. , & Weaver, GC. Faculty Adoption of Technologies in Team-Based Learning Classrooms. Poster session presented at: New England Faculty Development Consortium (NEFDC) 2015, May 29; Fairfield, CT.
http://www.ccsprojects.com/ - This white paper from CCS Presentation Systems partner eInstruction summarizes key points in that evidence and describe how eInstruction’s CPS student response system can be used in research-based ways to support effective instruction. eInstruction technology gives administrators the ability to instantly capture, grade, report and analyze student performance data. eInstruction offers educators and administrators a family of software, student response systems, interactive whiteboards, mobile interactive whiteboards and powerful enterprise-based administrative tools. Learn more about eInstruction’s CPS systems here: http://bit.ly/WN6wKr
In our department, we're required to present our study proposals for comment before submission to Higher Degrees. This allows for the group to give feedback for final corrections in the hope that the proposal is accepted without having to make major revisions.
This is the proposal presentation I gave to my department a few days ago. The feedback I received, although mainly editorial, means that the structure of this content is not the same as it will be in the final submission e.g. the Method has received another step in the process.
Adopting Classroom Technology: A Faculty Development ProgramBradford Wheeler
Wheeler, B., Adopting Classroom Technology: A Faculty Development Program. Poster presented at: New England Faculty Development Consortium (NEFDC) 2016, May 24; Somerville, MA.
Wheeler, B., Faculty Development through Action Research. [Accepted]: New England Faculty Development Consortium (NEFDC) 2016, November 18; Worcester, MA.
Assessment & Feedback Literature ReviewMorse Project
Presentation by Dr Ann Ooms and Hendrik van der Sluis, Kingston University, at the "Improving Assessment and Feedback Practices in a Technology-Enhanced Teaching and Learning Environment: Theory and Practice" Event, 19th May 2010 at Kingston University. Part of the "Higher Education Academy : Evidence Based Practice Seminar Series 2010"
The presentation provides an overview of recent literature concerning assessment and feedback
Faculty Adoption of Technologies in Team-Based Learning ClassroomsBradford Wheeler
Wheeler, B., Shih, M. , & Weaver, GC. Faculty Adoption of Technologies in Team-Based Learning Classrooms. Poster session presented at: New England Faculty Development Consortium (NEFDC) 2015, May 29; Fairfield, CT.
http://www.ccsprojects.com/ - This white paper from CCS Presentation Systems partner eInstruction summarizes key points in that evidence and describe how eInstruction’s CPS student response system can be used in research-based ways to support effective instruction. eInstruction technology gives administrators the ability to instantly capture, grade, report and analyze student performance data. eInstruction offers educators and administrators a family of software, student response systems, interactive whiteboards, mobile interactive whiteboards and powerful enterprise-based administrative tools. Learn more about eInstruction’s CPS systems here: http://bit.ly/WN6wKr
In our department, we're required to present our study proposals for comment before submission to Higher Degrees. This allows for the group to give feedback for final corrections in the hope that the proposal is accepted without having to make major revisions.
This is the proposal presentation I gave to my department a few days ago. The feedback I received, although mainly editorial, means that the structure of this content is not the same as it will be in the final submission e.g. the Method has received another step in the process.
Adopting Classroom Technology: A Faculty Development ProgramBradford Wheeler
Wheeler, B., Adopting Classroom Technology: A Faculty Development Program. Poster presented at: New England Faculty Development Consortium (NEFDC) 2016, May 24; Somerville, MA.
Wheeler, B., Faculty Development through Action Research. [Accepted]: New England Faculty Development Consortium (NEFDC) 2016, November 18; Worcester, MA.
Meaningful Conversations about EdTech: Transforming Student LearningBradford Wheeler
Co-Presenter: Meaningful Conversations about EdTech: Transforming Student Learning. Professional and Organizational Development (POD) Network 2016, November 10; Louisville, KY.
Enhancing (in)formal learning ties in interdisciplinary management courses: a...Bart Rienties
While interdisciplinary courses are regarded as a promising method for students to learn and apply knowledge from other disciplines, there is limited empirical evidence available whether interdisciplinary courses can effectively “create” interdisciplinary students. In this innovative quasi-experimental study amongst 377 Master’s students, in the control condition students were randomised by the teacher into groups, while in the experimental condition students were “balanced” by the teacher into groups based upon their initial social network. Using Social Network Analysis, learning ties after eleven weeks were significantly predicted by the friendship and learning ties established at the beginning of the course, as well as (same) discipline and group allocation. The effects were generally greater than group divisions, irrespective of the two conditions, but substantially smaller than initial social networks. These results indicate that interdisciplinary learning does not occur “automatically” in an interdisciplinary module. This study contributes to effective learning in interdisciplinary learning environments.
Rienties, B., & Héliot, Y. (2016). Enhancing (in)formal learning ties in interdisciplinary management courses: a quasi-experimental social network study. Studies in Higher Education. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2016.1174986. Impact factor: 1.037.
Full version is available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03075079.2016.1174986
ASCILITE Webinar: A review of five years of implementation and research in al...Bart Rienties
Date and time: Wednesday 20 September 2017 at 5pm AEST
Abstract: The Open University UK (OU) has been one of few institutions that have explicitly and systematically captured the designs for learning at a large scale. By applying advanced analytical techniques on large and fine-grained datasets, we have been unpacking the complexity of instructional practices, as well as providing empirical evidence of how learning designs influence student behaviour, satisfaction, and performance. This seminar will discuss the implementation of learning design at the OU in the last 5 years, and reviews empirical evidence from several studies that have linked learning design with learning analytics. Recommendations are put forward to support future adoptions of the learning design approach, and potential research trajectories.
https://ascilite.org/get-involved/sigs/learning-analytics-sig/
www.bartrienties.nl
Teachers’ Organizational Commitment in Nazarbayev Intellectual School in Tara...Nagima Sarsenbayeva
This study concerned the personal- and environmental factors that affect the organizational commitment of teachers at Nazarbayev Intellectual School of Physics and Mathematics (NIS) in Taraz, Kazakhstan. Understanding the relations between these variables clarified their significance and effect on teachers’ organizational commitment (OC). The purpose of the study was to examine the level of OC at the study site and to analyze the personal and environmental factors influencing teacher organizational commitment. Relevant factors from the literature were synthesized into personal characteristics, personal- and environmental factors. An initial conceptual framework connecting the factors was developed. The three-component model consisting of affective-, normative- and continuance organizational commitment (Allen and Meyer, 1990) was adopted. Total sampling or census sampling was used in this study to select the participants. A total sampling of 135 teachers from the target school was used. The data was gathered using self-administered questionnaires in English, Russian and Kazakh languages with a response rate of 98 percent. This study adopted a causal-comparative quantitative methodology. Respondents rated the global organizational commitment above the midpoint of the scale. Average affective- and normative commitment were rated above the mid-point of the assessment scale while average continuous commitment was rated below it. All environmental- and 81 percent of the personal factors were rated as affecting global organizational commitment. None of the personal- or environmental factor showed a statistically significant correlation with OC. Overall, organizational commitment is fairly healthy at the study site. The study documented confirmed some of the findings from the literature reviewed.
Increasing the Teacher's Effectiveness Toolboxjoniallison23
Can we change teachers’ attitudes and knowledge in
determining their own educator effectiveness by
looking through the lenses of data literacy, district
benchmarks, and student growth? This session will
include an overview of an action research project on
increasing teachers’ self-efficacy and demonstration of
the Benchmark Dashboard in Home Base.
ECER 2021 Voices of Engagement: A Malaysian School PerspectiveKatina Tan
Author: Katina Tan
The European Conference on Educational Research 2021 Online
EERA Network: 99. Emerging Researchers' Group (for presentation at Emerging Researchers' Conference)
Exploring Tools for Promoting Teacher Efficacy with mLearning (mlearn 2014 Pr...Robert Power
Slides for my presentation with Dean Cristol and Belinda Gimbert of Ohio State University at mLearn 2014, November 4, 2014, at Kadir-Has University in Istanbul, Turkey.
Dr Linda Corrin, University of Melbourne, discusses all things learning analytics. One of the important take-aways from this presentation is to define the question(s) before you start collecting data.
The Power of Learning Analytics: Is There Still a Need for Educational Research?Bart Rienties
Across the globe many institutions and organisations have high hopes that learning analytics can play a major role in helping their organisations remain fit-for-purpose, flexible, and innovative. A broad goal of learning analytics is to apply the outcomes of analysing data gathered by monitoring and measuring the learning process. Learning analytics applications in education are expected to provide institutions with opportunities to support learner progression, but more importantly provide personalised, rich learning on a large scale. Substantial progress in learning analytics research has been made in the last few years.
Researchers in learning analytics use a range of advanced computational techniques (e.g., Bayesian modelling, cluster analysis, natural language processing, machine learning) for predicting which learners are likely to fail or succeed, and how to provide appropriate support in a flexible and adaptive manner.
In this keynote, I will argue that unless educational researchers at EARLI embrace some of the key principles, methods, and approaches of learning analytics, educational researchers may be left behind. In particular, a main merit of learning analytics is linking large datasets of actual learning processes and outcomes with learning dispositions and learner characteristics. Using evidence-based approaches rapid insights and advancements are developed how learning designs and learning processes can be optimised to maximise the potential of each learner. For example, our recent research with 151 modules and 133K students at the Open University UK indicates that learning design has a strong impact on student behaviour, satisfaction, and performance. Learning analytics can also drive learning in more “traditional”, face-to-face contexts. For example, by measuring emotions, epistemological expressions, and cross-cultural dialogue, social interactions can be effectively supported by innovative dashboards and adaptive
approaches. I aim to unpack the advantages and limitations of learning analytics and how EARLI researchers can embrace such data-driven research approaches
More info at www.bartrienties.nl
Effective online communication in higher education requires several different interaction treatments: teacher-student, student-student, student-content, and student-learning management system. This literature review focuses on how to build effective online communication for college courses. Findings indicate that effective online communication is associated with educators who build the aforementioned interaction treatments into their course design, follow established principles of good education previously identified for face-to-face instruction, provide instructor presence, and integrate a variety of interactive tools to accommodate learner preferences and learner necessities.
Current Practices and Barriers of Training Paraeducators Who work with Elementary Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder in Inclusive Settings: The Results of a Paraeducator Training Survey By Emily Sobeck
Mobilising Remote Student Engagement: Lessons Learned from the FieldMorse Project
JISC funded Mobilising Remote Student Engagement Project (MoRSE). A collaborative project between Kingston University and De Montfort University.
http://morse.ac.uk
Meaningful Conversations about EdTech: Transforming Student LearningBradford Wheeler
Co-Presenter: Meaningful Conversations about EdTech: Transforming Student Learning. Professional and Organizational Development (POD) Network 2016, November 10; Louisville, KY.
Enhancing (in)formal learning ties in interdisciplinary management courses: a...Bart Rienties
While interdisciplinary courses are regarded as a promising method for students to learn and apply knowledge from other disciplines, there is limited empirical evidence available whether interdisciplinary courses can effectively “create” interdisciplinary students. In this innovative quasi-experimental study amongst 377 Master’s students, in the control condition students were randomised by the teacher into groups, while in the experimental condition students were “balanced” by the teacher into groups based upon their initial social network. Using Social Network Analysis, learning ties after eleven weeks were significantly predicted by the friendship and learning ties established at the beginning of the course, as well as (same) discipline and group allocation. The effects were generally greater than group divisions, irrespective of the two conditions, but substantially smaller than initial social networks. These results indicate that interdisciplinary learning does not occur “automatically” in an interdisciplinary module. This study contributes to effective learning in interdisciplinary learning environments.
Rienties, B., & Héliot, Y. (2016). Enhancing (in)formal learning ties in interdisciplinary management courses: a quasi-experimental social network study. Studies in Higher Education. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2016.1174986. Impact factor: 1.037.
Full version is available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03075079.2016.1174986
ASCILITE Webinar: A review of five years of implementation and research in al...Bart Rienties
Date and time: Wednesday 20 September 2017 at 5pm AEST
Abstract: The Open University UK (OU) has been one of few institutions that have explicitly and systematically captured the designs for learning at a large scale. By applying advanced analytical techniques on large and fine-grained datasets, we have been unpacking the complexity of instructional practices, as well as providing empirical evidence of how learning designs influence student behaviour, satisfaction, and performance. This seminar will discuss the implementation of learning design at the OU in the last 5 years, and reviews empirical evidence from several studies that have linked learning design with learning analytics. Recommendations are put forward to support future adoptions of the learning design approach, and potential research trajectories.
https://ascilite.org/get-involved/sigs/learning-analytics-sig/
www.bartrienties.nl
Teachers’ Organizational Commitment in Nazarbayev Intellectual School in Tara...Nagima Sarsenbayeva
This study concerned the personal- and environmental factors that affect the organizational commitment of teachers at Nazarbayev Intellectual School of Physics and Mathematics (NIS) in Taraz, Kazakhstan. Understanding the relations between these variables clarified their significance and effect on teachers’ organizational commitment (OC). The purpose of the study was to examine the level of OC at the study site and to analyze the personal and environmental factors influencing teacher organizational commitment. Relevant factors from the literature were synthesized into personal characteristics, personal- and environmental factors. An initial conceptual framework connecting the factors was developed. The three-component model consisting of affective-, normative- and continuance organizational commitment (Allen and Meyer, 1990) was adopted. Total sampling or census sampling was used in this study to select the participants. A total sampling of 135 teachers from the target school was used. The data was gathered using self-administered questionnaires in English, Russian and Kazakh languages with a response rate of 98 percent. This study adopted a causal-comparative quantitative methodology. Respondents rated the global organizational commitment above the midpoint of the scale. Average affective- and normative commitment were rated above the mid-point of the assessment scale while average continuous commitment was rated below it. All environmental- and 81 percent of the personal factors were rated as affecting global organizational commitment. None of the personal- or environmental factor showed a statistically significant correlation with OC. Overall, organizational commitment is fairly healthy at the study site. The study documented confirmed some of the findings from the literature reviewed.
Increasing the Teacher's Effectiveness Toolboxjoniallison23
Can we change teachers’ attitudes and knowledge in
determining their own educator effectiveness by
looking through the lenses of data literacy, district
benchmarks, and student growth? This session will
include an overview of an action research project on
increasing teachers’ self-efficacy and demonstration of
the Benchmark Dashboard in Home Base.
ECER 2021 Voices of Engagement: A Malaysian School PerspectiveKatina Tan
Author: Katina Tan
The European Conference on Educational Research 2021 Online
EERA Network: 99. Emerging Researchers' Group (for presentation at Emerging Researchers' Conference)
Exploring Tools for Promoting Teacher Efficacy with mLearning (mlearn 2014 Pr...Robert Power
Slides for my presentation with Dean Cristol and Belinda Gimbert of Ohio State University at mLearn 2014, November 4, 2014, at Kadir-Has University in Istanbul, Turkey.
Dr Linda Corrin, University of Melbourne, discusses all things learning analytics. One of the important take-aways from this presentation is to define the question(s) before you start collecting data.
The Power of Learning Analytics: Is There Still a Need for Educational Research?Bart Rienties
Across the globe many institutions and organisations have high hopes that learning analytics can play a major role in helping their organisations remain fit-for-purpose, flexible, and innovative. A broad goal of learning analytics is to apply the outcomes of analysing data gathered by monitoring and measuring the learning process. Learning analytics applications in education are expected to provide institutions with opportunities to support learner progression, but more importantly provide personalised, rich learning on a large scale. Substantial progress in learning analytics research has been made in the last few years.
Researchers in learning analytics use a range of advanced computational techniques (e.g., Bayesian modelling, cluster analysis, natural language processing, machine learning) for predicting which learners are likely to fail or succeed, and how to provide appropriate support in a flexible and adaptive manner.
In this keynote, I will argue that unless educational researchers at EARLI embrace some of the key principles, methods, and approaches of learning analytics, educational researchers may be left behind. In particular, a main merit of learning analytics is linking large datasets of actual learning processes and outcomes with learning dispositions and learner characteristics. Using evidence-based approaches rapid insights and advancements are developed how learning designs and learning processes can be optimised to maximise the potential of each learner. For example, our recent research with 151 modules and 133K students at the Open University UK indicates that learning design has a strong impact on student behaviour, satisfaction, and performance. Learning analytics can also drive learning in more “traditional”, face-to-face contexts. For example, by measuring emotions, epistemological expressions, and cross-cultural dialogue, social interactions can be effectively supported by innovative dashboards and adaptive
approaches. I aim to unpack the advantages and limitations of learning analytics and how EARLI researchers can embrace such data-driven research approaches
More info at www.bartrienties.nl
Effective online communication in higher education requires several different interaction treatments: teacher-student, student-student, student-content, and student-learning management system. This literature review focuses on how to build effective online communication for college courses. Findings indicate that effective online communication is associated with educators who build the aforementioned interaction treatments into their course design, follow established principles of good education previously identified for face-to-face instruction, provide instructor presence, and integrate a variety of interactive tools to accommodate learner preferences and learner necessities.
Current Practices and Barriers of Training Paraeducators Who work with Elementary Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder in Inclusive Settings: The Results of a Paraeducator Training Survey By Emily Sobeck
Mobilising Remote Student Engagement: Lessons Learned from the FieldMorse Project
JISC funded Mobilising Remote Student Engagement Project (MoRSE). A collaborative project between Kingston University and De Montfort University.
http://morse.ac.uk
Workshop by Dr Tim Linsey, Kingston University, at the "Improving Assessment and Feedback Practices in a Technology-Enhanced Teaching and Learning Environment: Theory and Practice" Event, 19th May 2010 at Kingston University. Part of the "Higher Education Academy : Evidence Based Practice Seminar Series 2010.
MoRSE Project - Emerging Feedback and Assessment IssuesMorse Project
Presentation by Dr Richard Hall, De Montfort University and Dr Tim Linsey, Kingston University, at the "Improving Assessment and Feedback Practices in a Technology-Enhanced Teaching and Learning Environment: Theory and Practice" Event, 19th May 2010 at Kingston University. Part of the "Higher Education Academy : Evidence Based Practice Seminar Series 2010"
The presentation provides an overview of the Mobilsing Remote Student Engagement (MoRSE) project and some of the emerging findings concerning feedback and assessment.
MoRSE Project - Emerging Feedback and Assessment IssuesMorse Project
Presentation by Dr Richard Hall, De Montfort University and Dr Tim Linsey, Kingston University, at the "Improving Assessment and Feedback Practices in a Technology-Enhanced Teaching and Learning Environment: Theory and Practice" Event, 19th May 2010 at Kingston University. Part of the "Higher Education Academy : Evidence Based Practice Seminar Series 2010"
The presentation provides an overview of the Mobilsing Remote Student Engagement (MoRSE) project and some of the emerging findings concerning feedback and assessment.
Libraries are uniquely poised to cooperate with other student support units to a central support entity to give non-traditional students the assistance they need to stay enrolled and on their way to a timely graduation. Bibliography for session presented at GaCOMO12 by Julie Poole.
Building a Connected Stance: Motivation and Engagement in Asynchronous Discus...Susan Wegmann
This presentation was delivered Oct. 29, 2009 at the Sloan C conference in Orlando. It presents a description of the Connected Stance and the moves that occur during the enactment of a connected stance.
Keynote SEC2019 Leeds: The power of learning analytics to impact learning and...Bart Rienties
The second keynote will be delivered by Professor Bart Rienties of the Open University who will discuss how the power of learning and teaching can be unharnessed by using learning analytics on Friday, January 11 .
The theme – Learning Spaces – will examine the many arenas in which students can learn and develop, create and collaborate, forge partnerships with communities, cross thresholds or take risks.
Over the course of both days, plenaries, breakout sessions and a panel will also consider sub-themes, such as informal learning spaces and architecture, digital platforms and technology enhanced learning environments.
http://teachingexcellence.leeds.ac.uk/events/keynoted-announced-and-bookings-now-open-for-sec2019/
REFERENCESAl Fiky, A. (2011). Blended Learning Educational kailynochseu
REFERENCES
Al Fiky, A. (2011). Blended Learning: Educational Design, Multi-media, Creative Thinking. Amman (Jordan): Dar Athaqafa for publishing and distribution.
Allan, B. (2007) Blended learning tools for teaching and training. London, UK: Facet Publishing.
Allen, I.E., and Seaman, J. (2013). Changing Course: Ten Years of Tracking Online Education in the United States. Sloan Consortium: USA. http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/changingcourse.pdf.
Arbaugh, J. B. and Duray, R. (2002) Technological and structural characteristics, students learning and satisfaction with web-based courses - an exploratory study of two on-line MBA programs. Management Learning, 33(3), 331-347.
Aycock, A., Garnham, C., & Kaleta, R. (2002). Lessons learned from the hybrid course project. Teaching with Technology Today, 8(6).
Babb, S., Stewart, C., & Johnson, R. (2010). Constructing communication in blended learning environments: Students’ perceptions of good practice in hybrid courses. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(4).
Baruque, L. B. and Melo, R. N. (2004) Learning theory and instructional design using learning objects. Journal of Education Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(4), 343-370.
Bonk C.J and Graham C.R (2005). Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives local designs, Pfeiffer Publishing, San Francisco, CA (2005).
Bliuc, A. M., Goodyear, P., & Ellis, R. A. (2007). Research focus and methodological choices in studies into students' experiences of blended learning in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 10, 231-244.
Clark, D. (2006). Blended learning. Retrieved from:
www.epic.co.uk/assets/files/wp_blended_learning.pdf
Cobb, P. (1994) Where is the mind? Constructivist and socio-culture perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 13-20.
De George-Walker, Linda & Keeffe, Mary. (2010). Self-determined blended learning: A case study of blended learning design. Higher Education Research and Development. 29. 1-13. 10.1080/07294360903277380.
Driscoll, M. (2002). Blended learning: Let’s get beyond the hype. Learning and training innovations news line. Retrieved March 22nd, 2013 from
http://www.ltimagazine.com/ltimagazine/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=11755
.
Duhaney, D. C. (2004). Blended learning in education, training, and development. Performance Improvement, 43(8), 35-38.
Dziuban, C., Moscal, P., & Hartman, J. (2005). Higher education, blended learning, and the generations: Knowledge is power - No more. In J. Bourne and J.C. Moore (Eds.), Elements of quality online education: Engaging communities (pp. 85-102) Needham, MA: Sloan-C.
Ertmer, P. A. and Newby, T. J. (1993) Behaviorism, cognitive, constructivism: comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6(4), 50-72.
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 7, 95−105.
Gra ...
This is a presentation by Dada Robert in a Your Skill Boost masterclass organised by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan (EFSS) on Saturday, the 25th and Sunday, the 26th of May 2024.
He discussed the concept of quality improvement, emphasizing its applicability to various aspects of life, including personal, project, and program improvements. He defined quality as doing the right thing at the right time in the right way to achieve the best possible results and discussed the concept of the "gap" between what we know and what we do, and how this gap represents the areas we need to improve. He explained the scientific approach to quality improvement, which involves systematic performance analysis, testing and learning, and implementing change ideas. He also highlighted the importance of client focus and a team approach to quality improvement.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
1. Improving Assessment and Feedback Practices in a Technology-Enhanced
Teaching and Learning Environment: An Overview of the Literature
Dr Ann Ooms, Faculty of Health and Social Care Sciences Kingston University and
St. George’s University of London
Hendrik van der Sluis, Academic Development Centre Kingston University
References Quoted in the Presentation
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 84, 3, 261-271.
Bangert-Drowns, R.L., Kulick, J.A., and Morgan, M.T. (1991). The instructional effect
of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61, 2, 213-238.
Bell, B. (1995). Interviewing: A technique for assessing science knowledge. In S.
Glynn & R. Duit (Eds.), Learning Science in Schools: research reforming
practice. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bell, B. and Cowie, B. (2001). The Characteristics of Formative Assessment in
Science Education, Science Education, 85, 536–553.
Bennington, A. (2007) Stick It in Your Ear: Keeping Current with Podcasts ONLINE,
May 2007 issue, viewed 20 September 2007,
http://www.infotoday.com/online/may07/index.shtml
Billett, S. (1996) Towards a Model of Workplace Learning: The learning curriculum.
Studies in Continuing Education, 18, 1, 43-58.
Black, P., and Wiliam, D. (1998a). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment
in Education, 5 (1): 7-74.
Black, P. and Wiliam, D. (1998b). Inside the black box: Raising standards through
classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80 (2): 139-148. (Available online:
http://www.pdkintl.org/kappan/kbla9810.htm.)
Boulos, M, Maramba, I & Wheeler, S (2006). Wikis, blogs and podcasts: a new
generation of Web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and
education, BMC Medical Education, vol. 6, available at
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/6/41, accessed 10 October 2008.
Boyle J.T. and Nicol, D.J., (2003). Using classroom communication systems to
support interaction and discussion in large class settings, Association for
Learning Technology Journal, 11(3), 43-57.
Brittain S, Glowacki P, Van Ittersum J, Johnson L. (2006) “Podcasting Lectures.”
EDUCAUSE Quarterly, Vol. 29 No. 3, 24–31, available at
http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/eqm0634.pdf, accessed 13 October 2008.
Bruner, J. (1960) Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MS, Harvard University Press.
Buchanan, T. (2000). The Efficacy of a World-Wide Web Mediated Formative
2. Assessment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16 (3), 193-200.
Butler, D.L. & Winnie, P.H. (1995) Feedback and self-regulated learning: a
theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245-281.
Chappuis, J.(2009). „Seven Strategies of Assessment for Learning‟. Hawker
Brownlow Education Pty Ltd
Cue, N. (1998). A universal learning tool for classrooms? Paper presented at the
First Quality in Teaching and Learning Conference, Hong Kong.
Cicchino, R. and Mirliss, D. (2006) Tablet PCs: A Powerful Teaching Tool, in Tablet
PC Research Project: COPHS Mobile Computing Program, M Genovese,
compiler). Butler University, available at
https://www.butler.edu/ir/cmsExternalDocuments/tabletResearchProject.pdf,
accessed 8 October 2008.
DiBattista, D. Mitterer, J.O and Gosse, L. (2004) Acceptance by undergraduates of
the immediate feedback assessment technique for multiple-choice testing,
Teaching in Higher Education, 9, 1, 17 - 28.
Dickenson, K (1997). Distance learning on the Internet: Testing students using Web
Forms and the computer-gateway interface, TechTrends, 42, 2, 43 – 46.
Dirks, M (1998) How is assessment being done in distance learning? Paper
presented at the Web98 conference, Northern Arizona University, 28 – 30 May.
Draper, S.W. and Brown, M.I., (2004). Increasing interactivity in lectures using and
electronic voting systems, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 81-94.
Elawar, M.C., and Corno, L. (1985). A factorial experiment in teachers' written
feedback on student homework: Changing teacher behaviour a little rather than
a lot. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 2, 162-173.
Elwood, J. and Klendowski, V (2002). Creating of shared practice: the challenges of
assessment use in learning and teaching, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher
Education, 27, 3, 243 – 256.
Freeman, M. (1997). Flexibility in access, interaction and assessment: The case for
web-based teaching programs, Australian Journal of Educational Technology,
13(1), 23-37.
Garrison, C. and Ehringhaus, M. (2004) Formative and Summative Assessments in
the Classroom, National Middle School Association, available at
nmsa.org/Publications/WebExclusive/Assessment/tabid/1120/Default.aspx,
accessed 5 October 2008.
Gaytan, J. & McEwen, B.C. (2007) „Effective Online Instructional and Assessment
Strategies‟. The American Journal of Distance Education, 21(3), pp.117–132
Gibbs, G.; Lucas, L.; Simonite, V.(1996) „Class Size and Student Performance:
1984-94. Studies in Higher Education, 21(3), pp. 231-73.
Gibbs, G. and Simpson, C. (2002) Does your assessment support your students‟
learning, Centre for Higher Education Practice, Open University.
Gibbs, G. (2006). „Why Assessment is changing‟. In Bryan, C. & Clegg, K. (2006)
„Innovative Assessment in Higher Education‟ (2nd Ed.). Oxon, Routledge
Gibbs, G. (2006). „How assessment frames student learning‟. In Bryan, C. & Clegg,
3. K. (2006) „Innovative Assessment in Higher Education‟ (2nd Ed.). Oxon,
Routledge
Gibbs, G. and Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports
learning, Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 3 -31.
Glaser, R., & Silver, E. (1994). Assessment, testing, and instruction: Retrospect and
prospect. Los Angeles, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards,
and Student Testing (CRESST).
Handley, K. & Williams, L. (2009) „From copying to learning: using exemplars to
engage students with assessment criteria and feedback‟. Assessment &
Evaluation in Higher Education, , First published on: 02 October 2009 (iFirst), pp.
1–14,
Hargreaves, E. (2005). Assessment for learning? Thinking outside the (black) box.
Cambridge Journal of Education 35, no. 2: 213–224.
HEFCE (2006) National Student Survey, results published in The Guardian, at
http://education.guardian.co.uk/students/table/0,,1857547,00.html
HEFCE (2008) 'The National Student Survey 2005-2007: Findings and trends'.
[Online]. Available from: http://www.hefce.ac.uk/learning/nss/
HEFCE (2010) „2009 National Student Survey‟. [Online]. Available from:
http://www.hefce.ac.uk/learning/nss/
Heinrich, E., Milne, J., Ramsay, A. & Morrison, D. (2010) „Recommendations for the
use of e-tools for improvements around assignment marking quality‟.
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(4), pp. 469-79
Higgins, R., Hartley, P. & Skelton, A. (2001). Getting the message across: the
problem of communicating assessment feedback. Teaching in Higher Education.
6, 2, 269-274.
Hodgen, J., and B. Marshall. (2005). Assessment for learning in English and
Mathematics: A comparison. The Curriculum Journal 16, no. 2: 153–176.
Hounsell, D. (2007). „Towards more sustainable feedback to students‟. In Boud, D. &
Falchikov, N. (2007). „Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education. Learning for
the longer term‟, (2nd Ed.). Oxon, Routledge
Hudson, J.N. and Bristow, D.R. (2006). Formative assessment can be fun as well as
educational, Advances in Physiology Education, 30, 33 – 37.
Hursh, T. (undated) Tablet PCs for Classroom Use: Technology and Application,
available at http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/courses/edpsy317/sp03/challenge-
reports/Hursh-TabletPC.html, accessed 6 October 2008.
Ivanic, R., Clark, R. and Rimmershaw, R. (2000), What am I supposed to make of
this? The messages conveyed to students by tutors‟ written comments. In M.R.
Lea and B. Stierer, (eds.), Student Writing in Higher Education: New Contexts.
Buckingham: SHRE/Open University Press.
Juniu S (2003). Implementing wireless technology in the classroom: the iPAQ
project. College Planning and Management, 6, 10, p.38-40.
Keegan D (2003). The future of learning: From eLearning to mLearning. Hagen:
Femstudienforchung, Germany. E-published version available:
4. http://learning.ericsson.net/mlearning2/old_sites/book.html, accessed 8 October
2008.
Kerka, S. and Wonacott, M.E. (2000) Assessing learners online, Practitioner File,
ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career and Vocational Education. Washington,
DS, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
Laurilard, D. (2002) Rethinking University Teaching: A conversational framework for
the effective use of learning technologies. 2nd edition. London: Routledge
Falmer
Laurillard, D.(2008) Digital Technologies and Their Role in Achieving Our Ambitions
for Education. Inaugural lecture. [Online]. Available from:
http://www.ioe.ac.uk/about/21450.html
Keppell, M., Au, E., Ma, A. & Chan, C. (2006) „Peer learning and learning-oriented
assessment in technology-enhanced Environments‟ Assessment & Evaluation in
Higher Education, 31(4), pp. 453-464.
Knight, P. (2002) „Summative Assessment in Higher Education: practices in
disarray‟. Studies in Higher Education, 27(3), pp. 275-86
Knight, P. (2006) 'The local practices of assessment', Assessment & Evaluation in
Higher Education, 31(4), pp. 435-52
Lawson, D. (1999). Formative assessment using computer-aided assessment,
Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 18, 4, 155 – 158.
Liang, X. and Creasy, K. (2004) Classroom assessment in web-based instructional
environment: Instructors‟ experiences, Practical Assessment, Research and
Evaluation, 9, 7, available at http://PAREonline.net/getvn?v=9&n=7, accessed 1
October 2008.
Lilley, M. and Barker, T. (2007) Students‟ perceived usefulness of formative
feedback for a computer-adaptive test, Electronic Journal of eLearning, 5, 1, 31
– 38.
Masikunas, G., Panayiotidis, A.and Burke, L. (2007) The use of electronic voting
systems in lectures within business and marketing: a case study of their impact
on student learning, ALT-J, 15, 1, pp. 3–20
Meng, P (2005) Podcasting and Vodcasting: A white paper – definitions, discussions
and implications. University of Missouri, available at
http://edmarketing.apple.com/adcinstitute/wp-
content/Missouri_Podcasting_White_Paper.pdf, accessed 12 October 2008.
Miller, Tess(2009) 'Formative computer-based assessment in higher education: the
effectiveness of feedback in supporting student learning', Assessment &
Evaluation in Higher Education, 34: 2, 181-92.
Middleton, A., Nortcliffe, A., Owens, R., (2009) iGather: learners as responsible
audio collectors of tutor, peer and self reflection. Paper presented at: A Word In
Your Ear 2009 - Audio Feedback, 18/12/2009 at Sheffield Hallam University.
[Online] available from:
http://research.shu.ac.uk/lti/awordinyourear2009/docs/Middleton-Nortcliffe-
Owens-iGather_final.pdf
5. Nicol, D (2008). Transforming Assessment and Feedback: Enhancing Integration
and Empowerment in the First Year. Centre for Academic Practice and Learning
Enhancement (CAPLE), University of Strathclyde
Nicol, D and MacFarlane-Dick, D (2004) Rethinking formative assessment in HE: a
theoretical model and seven principles of good feedback practice, in Enhancing
student learning through effective formative feedback, York, HEA.
Nicol,D.J. & Boyle, J. T. (2003) Peer Instruction versus Class-wide Discussion in
large classes: a comparison of two interaction methods in the wired classroom.
Studies in Higher Education 28(4), 457-473
Nicol, D.J. & Milligan, C. (2006), Rethinking technology-supported assessment in
terms of the seven principles of good feedback practice. In C. Bryan and K.
Clegg (Eds), Innovative Assessment in Higher Education, Taylor and Francis
Group Ltd, London
Nicol, D.J. (2010) „Assessment for learner self-regulation: enhancing achievement in
the first year using learning technologies‟. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher
Education, 34(3), pp. 335-52.
Orsmond, P., Merry, S,. Reiling, K (2005) Biology students‟ utilisation of tutors‟
formative feedback: a qualitative interview study, Assessment and Evaluation in
Higher Education, 30, 4, 369 – 386.
Peat, M., & Franklin, S. (2003). Has Student Learning been Improved by the Use of
Online and Offline Formative Assessment Opportunities? Australian Journal of
Educational Technology, 19 (1), 87-99.
Perry, D. (2003) Handheld computers (PDAs) in Schools. British Educational
Communications and Technology Agency, accessed from
http://publications.becta.org.uk/display.cfm, on 5 October 2008
Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioral Science, 28 (1): 4-
13.
Ribchester, C., France, D., and Wheeler, A.. (2007) Podcasting: a tool for enhancing
assessment feedback. Proceedings of4th Education in a Changing Environment,
pp131 -139 University of Salford. Available online at:
http://www.ece.salford.ac.uk/proceedings/papers/15_07.pdf, 23 May 2008
Rodway-Dyer, S.; Dunne, E. & Newcombe, M. (2009) „0207 Audio and Screen visual
feedback to support student learning‟. Conference paper at A Word In Your Ear
2009 - Audio Feedback, 18/12/2010 Sheffield Hallam University. [Online]
Available from: http://research.shu.ac.uk/lti/awordinyourear2009/
Rotheram, B. (2007) Using an MP3 recorder to give feedback on student
assignments. Educational Developments, Issue 8.2, June, pp.7-10, Staff and
Educational Development Association, London.
Prins, F.J., Sluijsmans, D.M.A., Kirschner, P.A. & Strijbos, J.W. (2005) „Formative
peer assessment in a CSCL environment: a case study‟. Assessment &
Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), pp. 417–444.
Sadler, D.R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems.
Instructional Science, 18 (2): 119-144.
6. Sadler, D.R. (1998) „Formative Assessment: revisiting the territory‟. Assessment in
Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), pp. 77-84
Savill-Smiith, C. (2005) Colloquium - The use of palmtop computers for learning: a
review of the literature. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 3, 567
Savill-Smith, C.and Kent, P. (2003). The Use of Palmtop Computers in Learning.
London, LSDA.
Scheeler, M.C.,Mcafee, J.K. and Ruhl, K. L. (2006) Effects of Corrective Feedback
via Wireless Technology on Pre-service Teacher Performance and Student
Behavior, Teacher Education and Special Education Journal, 29, 1, 12 – 25.
Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of classroom assessment in teaching and learning.
Los Angeles, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, - 568.and
Student Testing (CRESST).
Smith, T. (2003). Personal digital assistants (PDAs) in further and higher education,
London, JISC, accessed from http://www.ts-
consulting.co.uk/DownloadDocuments/PDAsinFurther&HigherEducation.doc, on
5 October 2008.
Stiggins, R. (1997) Student-Centred Classroom Assessment (2nd edition). Upper
Saddle River NJ, Merrill
Tilson, T., McLean, G.N. and Warner, J. (1998) An Evaluation of Distance Learning
in the University of Minnesota Human Resource Development Program. In
Academy of Human Resource Development Conference Proceedings, Oak
Brook, IL, 4 – 8 March, (R, Torraco, ed.)., pp.23 – 30.
Tinkelman, R. (2006) Podcasting Comes to Med School Curriculum, Web Weekly:
News from the Harvard Medical School Community, January, available at
http://webweekly.hms.harvard.edu/archive/2006/0130/student_scene.html,
accessed 14 October 2008.
Vispoel, W.P., and Austin, J.R. (1995). Success and failure in junior high school: A
critical incident approach to understanding students' attributional beliefs.
American Educational Research Journal, 32, 2, 377-412.
Wali, E., Winters, N. and Oliver, M (2008) Maintaining, changing and crossing
contexts: an activity theoretic reinterpretation of mobile learning, ALT-J, 16, 1,
41–57.
Weavers, C. (2003) What do students want from assessment? Exchange, Issue 4,
Spring, available at www.exchange.ac.uk/files/eissue4.pdf, accessed 9 October
2008.
Wickstrom, C.D. (2003) „A “funny” think happened on the way to the form‟. Journal of
Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 46(1), pp. 414-23.
Wiliam, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C. and Black, P. (2004) Teachers developing
assessment for learning: impact on student achievement, Assessment in
Education, 11, 1, 49 – 65.
Wit, E., (2003). “Who wants to be….The Use of a Personal Response System in
Statistics Teaching”, MSOR Connections, 3 (2), 14-20.
Yorke M (2003) Formative assessment in higher education: moves towards theory
7. and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. Higher Education 45, 4, 477-501.
Yorke, M. (2005). Formative assessment in higher education: Its significance for
employability, and steps to its enhancement, Tertiary Education and
Management, 11, 219 – 238.
Yorke, M.(2007) Assessment, especially in the first year of higher education: old
principles in new wrapping? Keynote Paper presented at the 2003 annual REAP
online conference, Assessment design for learner responsibility 29-31 May 2007,
available at
http://www.reap.ac.uk/reap07/Portals/2/CSL/keynotes/mantz%20yorke/Assessm
ent_old_principles_new_wrapping.pdf, accessed 9 October 2008.
Yorke M and Longden B (2007) The first-year experience in higher education in the
UK: report on Phase 1 of a project funded by the Higher Education Academy.
Available at http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/research/FirstYearExperience.pdf,
accessed 8 October 2008.