1. The assessment cycle document outlines the continuous process of establishing learning objectives, developing assessment plans, collecting and analyzing data, and implementing improvement plans at a college.
2. Key steps include establishing program outcomes and assessment plans aligned with college objectives, collecting and analyzing assessment data to identify areas for improvement, and creating plans to improve based on data review.
3. Assessment data, reports, and improvement plans are recorded in the TaskStream system and reviewed throughout the annual cycle to monitor progress and inform future assessment activities.
Operational Planning: The Key to Building a Culture of Implementation and Focus4Good.org
Ever wonder why organizations lose focus as their strategic plans gather dust on the shelf?
Ever wonder how to keep everyone on the same page during implementation, and preserve the energy and excitement generated during the strategic planning process?
Want to build a culture of focus that can knit together key organizational processes (planning, communications, evaluation and organizational learning) for sustainable high performance?
Tired of that "flying by the seat of our pants feeling?"
Successful organizations make the shift from "what" (visioning) to "how" (implementation) by building the infrastructure of implementation.
Join me in a practical discussion of what you can do create a focused, effective organization.
T Level Assessment & Curriculum Planning - Simple ExampleCapellaSystems
We have created an example of a T Level curriculum plan that demonstrates how teachers and trainers can address curriculum intent, implementation, impact, sequencing and mapping. This is a very simple example but shows how using Stedfast (https://stedfast.io) organisations can easily plan these programmes.
Apprenticeship Assessment & Curriculum Plan - Basic ExampleCapellaSystems
We have created a basic example of an apprenticeship assessment and curriculum plan that has been developed with Stedfast (https://stedfast.io). This shows how training providers are able to plan curriculum intent, implementation, impact, sequencing and mapping.
Simple Example of a GCSE assessment and curriculum plan using StedfastCapellaSystems
We have created a very simple example of GCSE assessment and curriculum planning using Stedfast. The example in this presentation is Year 10 History. It is designed to show how teachers and trainers can plan their curriculum intent and implementation, measure their curriculum impact, review curriculum sequencing and conduct curriculum gap analysis.
Operational Planning: The Key to Building a Culture of Implementation and Focus4Good.org
Ever wonder why organizations lose focus as their strategic plans gather dust on the shelf?
Ever wonder how to keep everyone on the same page during implementation, and preserve the energy and excitement generated during the strategic planning process?
Want to build a culture of focus that can knit together key organizational processes (planning, communications, evaluation and organizational learning) for sustainable high performance?
Tired of that "flying by the seat of our pants feeling?"
Successful organizations make the shift from "what" (visioning) to "how" (implementation) by building the infrastructure of implementation.
Join me in a practical discussion of what you can do create a focused, effective organization.
T Level Assessment & Curriculum Planning - Simple ExampleCapellaSystems
We have created an example of a T Level curriculum plan that demonstrates how teachers and trainers can address curriculum intent, implementation, impact, sequencing and mapping. This is a very simple example but shows how using Stedfast (https://stedfast.io) organisations can easily plan these programmes.
Apprenticeship Assessment & Curriculum Plan - Basic ExampleCapellaSystems
We have created a basic example of an apprenticeship assessment and curriculum plan that has been developed with Stedfast (https://stedfast.io). This shows how training providers are able to plan curriculum intent, implementation, impact, sequencing and mapping.
Simple Example of a GCSE assessment and curriculum plan using StedfastCapellaSystems
We have created a very simple example of GCSE assessment and curriculum planning using Stedfast. The example in this presentation is Year 10 History. It is designed to show how teachers and trainers can plan their curriculum intent and implementation, measure their curriculum impact, review curriculum sequencing and conduct curriculum gap analysis.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Assessment cycle and schedule with TaskStream menu
1. THE ASSESSMENT CYCLE
1. Learning objectives for college are established
2. Program outcomes are recorded and assessment plans developed in alignment
with the Program Outcomes and the College Objectives
3. Program Assessment data is collected and analyzed to determine where
improvements are needed
4. Plans to improve are based on data review and analysis
Program
Outcomes
5. Institutional Reports are created from your inputs Revised,
Recorded
6. Outcomes data and reports are reviewed Program
Assessment
Assessment
Plan is Drafted,
Discussed Recorded
Jan
Aug Jan
Assessment Assessment
Results Input in Results
Collected, Jul Feb Collected,
Recorded
TaskStream Recorded
Summer Mar
Annual Reports Jun Program
created from Assessment
your inputs Discussed
Plans to
improve based
on data
Recorded
2. CONTENTS
Slide #
Assessment Schedule 3
Assessment Cycle by term 4
Elements, Reports for Assessment
LOQI 8
Institutional Assessment Plan
(CSU-Global Assessment Process) 9
Annual Report on Student Achievement 10
Program Assessment Plan 11
Annual Program Action Plan 12
Annual Program Review and Discussion 13
TaskStream: where to enter data 14
Annual Stakeholder Reports 17
3. AD’s
PC’s
ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE Staff
Continuous AD’s, Assessment coordinator monitor Assessment Plans and support assessment process
December 31: Assessment Plan, new Program Learning Outcomes are input
January 5: Waypoint rubrics based on new Assessment Plan should be reviewed
February28: Findings, Recommendations for Fall Cycle Assessments should be input
March 28 Summary of Program Assessment and progress written in the TaskStream discussion area
AD’s monitor discussions
June 30: Program Improvement actions for Fall term should be recorded.
June-July: Hold Faculty Assessment Team meetings
July 31: Findings for Spring Cycle Assessments should be input into TaskStream from LOQI
Input Annual Program Action Plan to address problems, create new programs
Summary of Program Assessment and progress written in the TaskStream discussion area
August 31: AD’s review Action Plan, monitor discussions
Review the discussions of other programs
LOQI should be reviewed by PCs in preparation for starting new cycle
September 30: Institutional Assessment Plan should be reviewed, returned to the Assessment
Coordinator
September 30: New Program Learning Outcomes are input
October 31: Review sections of Annual Report and return to Assessment Coordinator
November-December: Hold Faculty Assessment Team meetings
Early December: AD’s will review progress on Program Assessment Plan
December 31: Program Assessment Plan, new Program Learning Outcomes are input
4. ASSESSMENT CYCLE: FALL TERM
August •Program outcomes are reviewed for the year and
revised or remain intact.
•(Program) Assessment Plan is created, if new program,
or reviewed for revision is existing program.
September •Care must be taken to align assessments with
outcomes
•PCs responsible
5. ASSESSMENT CYCLE: FALL TERM
September
•New Program outcomes input into TaskStream
•Annual Report on Student Achievement is generated (based on
previous assessment cycles)
•PCs review their sections of Annual Report
October
•Report is completed and delivered to stakeholders
•Associate Dean’s Review Assessment Plans and Write a Summary
•Associate Dean’s Review and Comment on Annual Report on
Student Achievement
Nov. –Dec. •Learning Outcomes Data is distributed
and analyzed
6. ASSESSMENT CYCLE: FALL TERM
November-Dec. •Coordinators offer each other peer review of plans and
recommendations
December- •Assessment Coordinator will generate reports on new
Assessment Plans/new Learning Outcomes to input into
January rubrics/Waypoint
Early January •If there are new or revised program outcomes they are
entered into Waypoint for WN C
March •Examine and discuss outcomes and plan to address issues
7. ASSESSMENT CYCLE:
SPRING TERM
End of • Program Coordinators receive learning
outcomes data on assessment results
Spring • Hold faculty, team meetings
All terms • Student Assessments data and improvement
plans are recorded in Taskstream
• PCs review data, discuss with
each other and faculty
July • Design Annual Program Action
Plan to address problems seen
in data
8. LOQI
Learning Outcomes and Quality Indicators.
Summary of how students are meeting
expectations
Reports generated at end of every term
PCs must review all reports for year by August.
Weaknesses should be addressed with new
outcomes goals in the coming academic year
9. CSU-GLOBAL ASSESSMENT PLAN
Describes how CSU-G will assess
students at an institutional level
Outlines new assessments, plans for
improvement of outcomes
PCs need to review it annually and
recommend changes to improve
performance
10. ANNUAL REPORT ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT
Generated from several sources:
Learning Outcomes Quality Indicator (LOQI)
ETS Proficiency Profile
(standardized tests of CSUG students)
Graduate Survey Results
Asks questions about how former students
perceived their education
PCs review their part in October
11. PROGRAM ASSESSMENT PLAN
Designed by PCs together with key faculty
Aligns Program Outcomes with specific
Assessments
Is entered into TaskStream by end of
November
PCs review the plans of each other and
revise accordingly before new outcomes are
input into Waypoint for Students
12. ANNUAL PROGRAM ACTION PLAN
• Done at the end of the annual assessment
cycles to review broadly program progress
• Based on LOQI, PCs, together with faculty,
make plans for improvement of outcomes
• Plans must be entered into TaskStream by
July
• Report is generated from the Plans for
stakeholders
13. REVIEW, DISCUSS
Last stage of annual assessment cycle
Provides an opportunity to review results of
last year, see results of changes made in fall
Opportunity to talk to other PCs,
stakeholders about goals for the coming year
14. TASKSTREAM:
ASSESSMENT PLANS
• June-July
• Hold Biannual Faculty Assessment Team
meetings
• 2-3 Program Faculty to review and comment
on program plan, data results and make
recommendations
• September 30: New Program Learning Outcomes
are input
• November-December
• Hold Biannual Faculty Assessment Team
meetings
• December 31: Input Assessment Plan for new
year
• January 5: Waypoint rubrics based on new
Assessment Plan should be reviewed
15. TASKSTREAM SCHEDULE
RESULTS AND IMPROVEMENT
• Continuous: Review LOQI at the end of every
term
• January 31: Program Improvement actions for Fall
term should be recorded.
• These include advisory committee,
timelines for implementation plans, plans
for new program outcomes
• February 28: Findings, Recommendations for
Fall Cycle Assessments should be input
• June 30: Program Improvement actions for Fall
term should be recorded.
• July 31: Findings for Spring Cycle Assessments
should be input
• The outcomes shown in the LOQI for the
assessments specified in the Assessment
plan should be evaluated
16. TASKSTREAM SCHEDULE
ANNUAL PROGRAM ACTION PLAN
• July: discuss your own plans and those of other
PCs in TaskStream discussion board
• July 31: Input Annual Program Action Plan to
address problems, create new programs
17. REPORT DEADLINES:
INSTITUTIONAL ASSESSMENT PLAN
• August 31: All LOQI should be reviewed by
PCs in preparation for starting new cycle
• Faculty committees and other
stakeholders should participate
• September 30: Institutional Assessment
Plan should be reviewed and returned to
the Assessment Coordinator
19. AD’s
PC’s
ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE Staff
Continuous AD’s, Assessment coordinator monitor Assessment Plans and support assessment process
December 31: Assessment Plan, new Program Learning Outcomes are input
January 5: Waypoint rubrics based on new Assessment Plan should be reviewed
February28: Findings, Recommendations for Fall Cycle Assessments should be input
March 28 Summary of Program Assessment and progress written in the TaskStream discussion area
AD’s monitor discussions
June 30: Program Improvement actions for Fall term should be recorded.
June-July: Hold Faculty Assessment Team meetings
July 31: Findings for Spring Cycle Assessments should be input into TaskStream from LOQI
Input Annual Program Action Plan to address problems, create new programs
Summary of Program Assessment and progress written in the TaskStream discussion area
August 31: AD’s review Action Plan, monitor discussions
Review the discussions of other programs
LOQI should be reviewed by PCs in preparation for starting new cycle
September 30: Institutional Assessment Plan should be reviewed, returned to the Assessment
Coordinator
September 30: New Program Learning Outcomes are input
October 31: Review sections of Annual Report and return to Assessment Coordinator
November-December: Hold Faculty Assessment Team meetings
Early December: AD’s will review progress on Program Assessment Plan
December 31: Program Assessment Plan, new Program Learning Outcomes are input
20. WHAT SHOULD BE DONE RIGHT NOW (1/17)
Program learning outcomes were just input and put into rubrics
Make sure they are also recorded in Curriculum Map
Please send me a list of the
classes in the program
together with the outcomes
each course assesses so I
can input this for you (if you
have not already done it)
21. WHAT SHOULD BE DONE NEXT (2/28)
• February 28: Findings, Recommendations for
Fall Cycle Assessments should be input