Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College 55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111 PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D Approved: 23/03/2020, Version 2 Unit Code and Title: SBM3204 Sustainability and Ethics Assessment Overview Assessment Task Weighting Due Length ULO Assessment 1: Quiz Online quiz of key content areas to identify further support needs 10% Week 3 30 mins ULO-1 Assessment 2: Critical review (Individual) Students need to provide a written constructive criticism or judgement on a given topic by the lecturer 30% Week 6 2000 words ULO-1 ULO-2 Assessment 3: Report (Individual) Students will provide a written report based on one of topics provided by the lecturer 30% Week 9 1500 words ULO-1 ULO-2 ULO-3 ULO-4 Assessment 4: Case Study Analysis (Individual) Students will provide a case study report comprising answers to four Case Study questions 30% Week 11 1500 words ULO-1 ULO-2 ULO-3 ULO-5 Assessment Brief Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College 55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111 PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D Approved: 23/03/2020, Version 2 Assessment 1: Quiz Due date: Week 3 Group/individual: Individual assessment Word count / Time provided: 30 minutes Weighting: 10% Unit learning outcomes: ULO-1 Graduate Attributes: GA-2 Assignment Details: This online quiz will assess your knowledge of key content areas (Week 1 & 2 content) and to identify further support needs. For successful completion of the quiz, you are required to study the material provided (lecture slides, tutorials, and reading materials), engage in the unit’s activities, and in the discussion forums. The prescribed textbook is the main reference along with the recommended reading material. Marking Information: The quiz will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 10% of the total unit mark. Assessment 2: Critical review Due date: Week 6 Group/individual: Individual assessment Word count: 2,000 Weighting: 30% Unit learning outcomes: [ULO1], [ULO2] Course Learning Outcomes: [CLO1], [CLO4], [CLO7] Graduate Attributes: GA-3, GA-4, GA-5 Assessment Details: Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College 55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111 PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D Approved: 23/03/2020, Version 2 Students are required to provide a written constructive criticism or judgement on a given topic selected by students themselves. The assessment includes the following key components: 1. Conduct literature review around the business ethics and corporate social responsibility of small or multinational businesses. 2. Critically eva.

1. Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia
Pacific International College
55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111
PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D
Approved: 23/03/2020, Version 2
Unit Code and Title: SBM3204 Sustainability and Ethics
Assessment Overview
Assessment Task
Weighting Due Length ULO
Assessment 1: Quiz
Online quiz of key content areas to identify further
support needs
10% Week 3 30 mins
ULO-1
Assessment 2: Critical review
(Individual)
Students need to provide a
written constructive criticism or judgement on a given

2. topic by the lecturer
30% Week 6 2000 words ULO-1
ULO-2
Assessment 3: Report (Individual)
Students will provide a written report based on one of
topics provided by the lecturer
30% Week 9
1500 words
ULO-1
ULO-2
ULO-3
ULO-4
Assessment 4: Case Study Analysis (Individual)
Students will provide a case study report comprising
answers to four Case Study questions
30% Week
11
1500 words ULO-1
ULO-2
ULO-3
ULO-5

3. Assessment
Brief
Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia
Pacific International College
55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111
PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D
Approved: 23/03/2020, Version 2
Assessment 1: Quiz
Due date: Week 3
Group/individual: Individual assessment
Word count / Time provided: 30 minutes

4. Weighting: 10%
Unit learning outcomes: ULO-1
Graduate Attributes: GA-2
Assignment Details:
This online quiz will assess your knowledge of key content
areas (Week 1 & 2 content) and to identify
further support needs. For successful completion of the quiz,
you are required to study the material
provided (lecture slides, tutorials, and reading materials),
engage in the unit’s activities, and in the
discussion forums. The prescribed textbook is the main
reference along with the recommended
reading material.
Marking Information: The quiz will be marked out of 100 and
will be weighted 10% of the total
unit mark.
Assessment 2: Critical review
Due date: Week 6
Group/individual: Individual assessment

5. Word count: 2,000
Weighting: 30%
Unit learning outcomes: [ULO1], [ULO2]
Course Learning Outcomes: [CLO1], [CLO4], [CLO7]
Graduate Attributes: GA-3, GA-4, GA-5
Assessment Details:
Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia
Pacific International College
55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111
PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D
Approved: 23/03/2020, Version 2
Students are required to provide a written constructive criticism
or judgement on a given topic
selected by students themselves. The assessment includes the
following key components:
1. Conduct literature review around the business ethics and
corporate social responsibility of
small or multinational businesses.
2. Critically evaluate the ethics and corporate social

6. responsibility practices of the case
organisation selected by the lecturer.
3. Analyse the ethics issues and utilise the relevant theories
(e.g. Decision Making Model,
Stakeholder Theory) to improve decision making for the chosen
organisation.
The business report format is required for the individual
assignment. The headings and subheadings
are strongly recommended to structure the business report. The
Harvard Referencing Style is
required. For detailed requirement, please refer to the
guidelines of how to write Business Report
and academic writing style. It is strongly recommended to
review SLS learning Enhancement Section
in APIC Canvas. The link of Business Report Guideline was
provided in the assessment section of this
subject in the Canvas.
Marking Criteria and Rubric: The assessment will be marked
out of 100% and will be
weighted 30% of the total unit mark
Marking Criteria
Not satisfactory

7. (0-49%) of the
criterion
mark)
Satisfactory
(50-64%) of
the criterion
mark
Good
(65-74%) of
the criterion
mark
Very Good
(75-84%) of the
criterion mark
Excellent
(85-100%) of the
criterion mark
Demonstrate

8. relevancy of
ethics for
business
decisions –
literature review
and discussion
(30%)
Inadequate
understanding
of ethics for
business
decisions –
literature
review and
discussion
Basic
knowledge
of ethics for
business
decisions –
literature
review and
discussion
Exhibits
breadth and
depth of
understanding

9. of ethics for
business
decisions –
literature
review and
discussion
Exhibits
accurate and
detailed
breadth and
depth of
understanding
of ethics for
business
decisions –
literature
review and
discussion
Displays exceptional
ability in and
understanding of
ethics for business

10. decisions – literature
review and
discussion
Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia
Pacific International College
55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111
PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D
Approved: 23/03/2020, Version 2
Demonstrate
how ethics is
relevant for
business
decisions in a
chosen case
organisation
(30%)
Inadequate
understanding
of ethics for
business
decisions –
literature
review and
discussion

11. Basic
knowledge
of ethics for
business
decisions –
literature
review and
discussion
Exhibits
breadth and
depth of
understanding
of ethics for
business
decisions –
literature
review and
discussion
Exhibits
accurate and
detailed
breadth and
depth of

12. understanding
g of ethics
for business
decisions –
literature
review and
discussion
Displays exceptional
ability in and
understanding of
ethics for business
decisions – literature
review and
discussion
Demonstrate an
understanding of
ethics issues and
capability of
apply theories
into practices
(30%)
Inadequate
understanding

13. of ethics issues
and incapable
of applying
theories into
practices
Basic
knowledge of
understanding
of ethics
issues and lack
of theory
application
Exhibits breadth
and depth of
understanding
of ethics issues
and capable of
applying some
basic theories

14. into practices
Exhibits accurate
and detailed
breadth and
depth of
understanding of
ethics issues and
capable of
applying theories
into practices
sufficiently
Displays exceptional
ability in and
understanding of
ethics issues and
high capability of
applying theories
into practices

15. Demonstrate
capability of
academic writing
skills (grammar,
spelling,
presentation and
referencing)
(10%)
Poor academic
writing skills
with grammar
and spelling
errors. Poor
presentation
structure and
failed to follow
Harvard
referencing
style
Satisfactory
writing skills
with grammar

16. and spelling
errors. Poor
presentation
structure and
failed to
follow Harvard
referencing
style
Good academic
writing skills
with minor
grammar and
spelling errors.
Clear
presentation
structure
following
Harvard

17. referencing style
Excellent writing
skills without
grammar and
spelling errors.
Excellent
presentation
structure
following Harvard
referencing style.
Exceptional academic
writing skills.
Professional
presentation
structure following
Harvard referencing
style
Assessment 3: Debate

18. Due date: Week 9
Group/individual: Individual assessment
Word count: 1500 words
Weighting: 30%
Unit learning outcomes: [ULO1], [ULO2], [ULO3], [ULO4]
Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia
Pacific International College
55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111
PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D
Approved: 23/03/2020, Version 2
Course Learning Outcomes: [CLO1], [CLO4], [CLO6]
Graduate Attributes: GA-3, GA-5
Assessment Details:
Student will be required to write up a debate based on one of
debate topics provided by the
Lecturer. The assessment includes the following key
components:
1. Introduction

19. 2. Proposition 1 (support the resolution):
- Logical arguments for Proposition 1
- Gathered supporting evidence and examples for position taken
- Relevant theories learnt to support the arguments
3. Proposition 2 (against the resolution)
- Logical arguments for Proposition 2
- Gathered supporting evidence and examples for position taken
- Relevant theories learnt to support the argument
4. Conclusion
- Your final thoughts and opinions
The business report format is required for the individual
assignment. The headings and subheadings
are strongly recommended to structure the business report. The
Harvard Referencing Style is
required. For detailed requirement, please refer to the
guidelines of how to write Business Report
and academic writing style. It is strongly recommended to
review SLS learning Enhancement Section
in APIC Canvas. The link of Business Report Guideline was
provided in the assessment section of this

20. subject in the Canvas.
Marking Criteria and Rubric: The assessment will be marked
out of 100% and will be
weighted 30% of the total unit mark
Marking
Criteria
Not satisfactory
(0-49%) of the
criterion mark)
Satisfactory
(50-64%) of the
criterion mark
Good
(65-74%) of
the criterion
mark
Very Good
(75-84%) of
the criterion
mark
Excellent

21. (85-100%) of
the criterion
mark
Demonstrate an
understanding
of the
importance of
ethical
considerations
(40%)
Inadequate
understanding of
the importance of
ethical
considerations
Basic knowledge of
the importance of
ethical considerations
Exhibits breadth
and depth of
understanding of
the importance of
ethical
considerations
Exhibits accurate

22. and detailed
breadth and depth
of understanding
of the importance
of ethical
considerations
Displays
exceptional ability
in and
understanding of
the importance of
ethical
considerations
Clear and
convincing
Poorly
articulated,
unconvincing
argument
Basic
communication of
some facts in
Evidence of
both presenting
an argument
and refuting an
Above average
use of evidence
to support a

23. position and
Sophisticated
use of evidence
to support a
position and
Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia
Pacific International College
55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111
PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D
Approved: 23/03/2020, Version 2
argument
(40%)
support of one side
of the argument
alternative
position
refute the
alternative.
refute the
alternative.
Report

24. presentation
and
referencing
(20%)
Poor
presentation
report format.
Poor writing skills
with grammar
and spelling
errors. Fail to
follow Harvard
referencing style.
Satisfactory
presentation format
and writing skills
with some grammar
and spelling errors.
Fail to follow
Harvard referencing
style.
Good
presentation
format and
writing skills
with spelling
errors. Follow
Harvard
referencing

25. style.
Excellent
presentation
format and
writing skills
without spelling
errors. Follow
Harvard
referencing style
Distinguished
presentation
format and
writing skills.
Following
Harvard
referencing style
completely.
Assessment 4: Case Study Analysis
Due date: Week 11
Group/individual: Individual assessment
Word count: 1500 words
Weighting: 30%
Unit learning outcomes: [ULO1], [ULO2], [ULO3], [ULO5]
Course Learning Outcomes: [CLO1], [CLO2], [CLO6], [CLO8]
Graduate Attributes: GA-2, GA-3, GA-4, GA-5

26. Assessment Details:
A Case study report will be provided comprising answers to
four case study analysis questions. The
business report format is required for the submission.
The business report format is required for the individual
assignment. The headings and subheadings
are strongly recommended to structure the business report. The
Harvard Referencing Style is
required. For detailed requirement, please refer to the
guidelines of how to write Business Report
and academic writing style. It is strongly recommended to
review SLS learning Enhancement Section
in APIC Canvas. The link of Business Report Guideline was
provided in the assessment section of this
subject in the Canvas.
Marking Criteria and Rubric: The assessment will be marked
out of 100% and will be
weighted 30% of the total unit mark
Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia

27. Pacific International College
55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111
PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D
Approved: 23/03/2020, Version 2
Marking
Criteria
Not satisfactory
(0-49%) of the
criterion mark)
Satisfactory
(50-64%) of the
criterion mark
Good
(65-74%) of
the criterion
mark
Very Good
(75-84%) of
the criterion
mark
Excellent

28. (85-100%) of
the criterion
mark
Demonstrate an
understanding
of the case
questions (40%)
Inadequate
understanding of
the case questions
and major issues
are not identified
Basic understanding
of the case questions
and major issues were
identified partially
Exhibits breadth
and depth of
understanding of
the case questions
and major issues
were identified
clearly
Exhibits accurate
and detailed
breadth and depth
of understanding
of the case

29. questions and
major issues were
discussed well
Displays
exceptional ability
in and
understanding of
the case questions
and major issues
were discussed
critically.
Demonstrate
analytical and
critical
thinking skills
(40%)
Poorly
articulated,
unconvincing
evidences
provided. Lack of
theories
application
Basic
communication of
some facts in
support of case
solution. Lack of

30. theory application
Evidence of
clear convincing
facts and
evidences
provided. Some
theories applied
for the analysis
Above average
use of evidence
to support the
case analysis.
Good theory
application
Sophisticated
use of evidence
to support the
case analysis.
Excellent theory
application
Report
presentation
and
referencing
(20%)
Poor

31. presentation
including report
format. Poor
writing skills with
grammar and
spelling errors.
Fail to follow
Harvard
referencing style.
Satisfactory
presentation
format and writing
skills with some
grammar and
spelling errors. Fail
to follow Harvard
referencing style.
Good
presentation
format and
writing skills
with spelling
errors. Fail to
follow Harvard
referencing
style.
Excellent
presentation
format and
writing skills
without spelling
errors. Follow
Harvard

32. referencing style
Distinguished
presentation
format and
writing skills.
Following
Harvard
referencing style
completely.