Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Twin Studies and Biological Gender Development
1. Twin Studies
TRUE or FALSE
1. MZ twins share the same gestational environment
2. DZ twins share the same genetic material
3. Every trait MZ twins are born with is genetically
determined
4. DZ twins share the same social environment
5. MZ twins share the same social environment
MZ = identical
DZ = non-identical
2. Lesson Objectives
By the end of the lesson you …
1. Define (AO1) Sex and Gender in terms of
labels.
2. Describe Sex and Gender in the context of
the biological approach and the naturenurture debate.
3. Describe (AO1) the case study of Money
(1975).
6. Sex vs. Gender
Sex: the biological and
physiological characteristics
that define men and women.
“Male” and “Female”
• Women menstruate while
men do not
• Men have testicles while
women do not
• Women have developed
breasts that are usually
capable of lactating, while
men have not
• Men generally have more
massive bones than women
Gender: the socially constructed
roles, behaviours, activities, and
attributes that a given society
considers appropriate for men
and women.
“Masculine" and ”Feminine”
• Masculine men like football,
cars and guns
• Feminine people straighten
their hair
• Women clean – men work
8. 1. Define (AO1) Sex and Gender in terms of labels.
2. Describe Sex and Gender in the context of the
biological approach and the nature-nurture
debate.
3. Describe (AO1) the case study of Money (1975).
10. Lesson Objectives
By the end of the lesson you …
• Must be able to describe (AO1) – APRC – the
Dr. Money Study.
• Should be able to evaluate (AO2) the Dr.
Money study in terms of ethics and
generalisability.
11. A
P
• Aim
• What did they hope to find? What was their
research question? What theory is the study
attempting to support? How is it going to support it?
• Procedure
• What did they do? How did they do it? Who did they
do it to? When did they do it?
Time line activity
Using your notes from yesterday and the course reader
create a timeline of the Dr Money case.
13. • Must be able to describe (AO1) – APRC – the Dr.
Money Study.
• Should be able to evaluate (AO2) the Dr. Money
study in terms of ethics and generalisability.