This document provides instructions for critiquing a piece of art. It outlines 4 steps: 1) Describe - list everything seen in the artwork, even if unknown; 2) Analyze - explain how lines, shapes, colors, textures are used; 3) Interpret - discuss what is happening and the intended message; 4) Decide - determine if the artwork is liked and why, and identify its strengths and weaknesses. Students are prompted to think critically about technical and compositional elements, as well as conceptual meaning. The goal is to analyze, interpret, and evaluate the effectiveness of the artwork.
Painting and Arts date back to prehistoric times. Cave Paintings, Rock Carvings, Stone Calligraphy, eventually evolving into using vegetable compounds as color pigments.
Minimalism Art Movement - Art Appreciation
A brief overview of the art movement that took place in New York, early 1960s. This movement is apparently a blatant rejection of abstract expressionism.
Discover the world of Optical Illusion Art. This presentation includes work by M.C. Escher, Bridget Riley, and how-to steps for making your very own Op Art.
Credit to Mrs. Brown's Art Class (Google for more information!)
Painting and Arts date back to prehistoric times. Cave Paintings, Rock Carvings, Stone Calligraphy, eventually evolving into using vegetable compounds as color pigments.
Minimalism Art Movement - Art Appreciation
A brief overview of the art movement that took place in New York, early 1960s. This movement is apparently a blatant rejection of abstract expressionism.
Discover the world of Optical Illusion Art. This presentation includes work by M.C. Escher, Bridget Riley, and how-to steps for making your very own Op Art.
Credit to Mrs. Brown's Art Class (Google for more information!)
Jr. High Lesson Plan - Fish Sculpture using recycled materialscdpenamtz
Go Fish lesson plan adapted from Linda Eastman
Unit: Recycling Sculpture
Lesson: Go Fish! Fish or other Sea Creatures from Recycled Materials
Grade: Jr. high ( Middle School)
The Art of Asking Survey Questions: 7 Survey-Writing Don'tsHubSpot
What types of questions should you avoid the next time you have to write a survey to get feedback?
This presentation covers just a section of our guide: What not to do when writing survey questions. Get your free copy of the complete guide and workbook, The Art of Asking Survey Questions, right here: http://hub.am/1imzkQ6
Art Criticism Take a field trip to a museum, gallery.docxdavezstarr61655
Art Criticism
Take a field trip to a museum, gallery, etc. to view works of art in order to find something you would
be interested in writing about in the mode of art criticism, including how the artwork relates to a
topic or theory we have covered in class, and using at least two sources (at least one of which should
be a scholarly article NOT from our course). 6 pages minimum.
Describe: Tell what you see (the visual facts).
Questions to consider:
1. Where did you see the art? (Name gallery/museum/etc., geographical location, etc.)
2. What is the name of the artist who created the artwork?
3. What kind of an artwork is it?
4. What is the name of the artwork?
5. When was the artwork created?
6. Name some other major events in history that occurred at the same time this artwork was
created.
7. List the literal objects in the painting (trees, people, animals, mountains, rivers, etc.).
8. What do you notice first when you look at the work(s)? Why?
9. What kinds of colors do you see? How would you describe them?
10. What shapes can we see? What kind of edges do the shapes have?
11. Are there lines in the work(s)? If so, what kinds of lines are they?
12. What sort of textures do you see? How would you describe them?
13. What time of day/night is it? How can we tell?
13. What is the overall visual effect or mood of the work(s)?
Analyze: Mentally separate the parts or elements, thinking in terms of textures, shapes/forms,
light/dark or bright/dull colors, types of lines, and sensory qualities. In this step consider the
most significant art principles that were used in the artwork. Describe how the artist used them
to organize the elements. Suggested questions to help with analysis:
Questions to consider:
1. How has the artist used colors in the work(s)?
2. What sort of effect do the colors have on the artwork?
3. How as the artist used shapes within the work of art?
4. How have lines been used in the work(s)? Has the artist used them as an important or
dominant part of the work, or do they play a different roll?
5. What role does texture play in the work(s)? Has the artist used the illusion of texture or has
the artist used actual texture? How has texture been used within the work(s).
6. How has the artist used light in the work(s)? Is there the illusion of a scene with lights and
shadows, or does the artist use light and dark values in a more abstracted way?
7. How has the overall visual effect or mood of the work(s)? been achieved by the use of
elements of art and principles of design.
8. How were the artists design tools used to achieve a particular look or focus?
Interpret: An interpretation seeks to explain the meaning of the work based on what you have
learned so far about the artwork, what do you think the artist was trying to say?
Questions to consider:
1. What was the artist’s statement.
Select a museumI have already went to the Museum the work selecte.docxzenobiakeeney
Select a museum:
I have already went to the Museum the work selected is The cradle by John Biggers please see photos attached.
Select a work of art:
This is a general suggestion and not a required outline.
Identification:
At the museum or museum site, select a work of art. You may select a piece that you like or dislike. Copy down all the information provided; Artist, title, medium, year, etc. Write down your initial responses. How do you respond to the work? Does it invoke an emotional response? What do you think the artist was trying to communicate? It is helpful to bring a notebook to record your responses.
Describe
the piece and review it carefully. What do you see? Note all the details about the work. How would you describe it to someone you were talking to on the phone who can’t see it?
Analyze
the visual elements and design principles as you did in the short paper. Think about the relationship between form, content and subject matter in your analysis. This will be helpful in your 'interpretation' of the work. Use the terminology you have learned in class, particularly terms in Chapters 2 -5. Your analysis should be based your own observations while viewing the work.
Interpretation
Follow your analysis with a subjective interpretation of the meaning of the work. How does the work make you feel? What do you think the content is? Go beyond “I like it” or “I don’t like it.”
Research
the artist. Historical and biographical information on the artist often provides clues into a works intended meaning. Carefully consider the purpose and context of the piece. Did the piece you selected have any particular political or cultural message? Was the artist making a statement?
Value Judgement
What do you think the artist's intentions were? Was this communicated? Does it have value? Can you recognize the aesthetic quality in the work?
Write the Final Paper:
The following will help you write your paper. It should be used as a guideline, not an outline for approaching your paper. This is very similar to the process used by art critics.
Identification:
Note the title of the work, the date, the artist (if known), medium, and size.
Description:
What do you see? As fully as possible, describe what you see.
What medium is used? What is it made of?
How big is it?
Go into detail about what you see. How would you describe it, in detail, to someone who had never seen it?
What subjects are represented?
It can be helpful to begin looking at a work of art from the middle and work your way out.
Analysis:
Describe the form of the work Explain how visual elements and principles of design are used in the work. The terms in chapters 2, 3 & 4 will be very helpful. Go back and look at the chapter outlines or Short Paper assignment. Use them to:
Describe the use of visual elements such as line, shape, color & space used in the pieces. For example: In what way is it balanced? Is it asymmetrical or symmetrical? What is emphasized? What seems to be the dominating vi.
Select a museumI have already went to the Museum the work selecte.docxnicolleszkyj
Select a museum:
I have already went to the Museum the work selected is The cradle by John Biggers please see photos attached.
Select a work of art:
This is a general suggestion and not a required outline.
Identification:
At the museum or museum site, select a work of art. You may select a piece that you like or dislike. Copy down all the information provided; Artist, title, medium, year, etc. Write down your initial responses. How do you respond to the work? Does it invoke an emotional response? What do you think the artist was trying to communicate? It is helpful to bring a notebook to record your responses.
Describe
the piece and review it carefully. What do you see? Note all the details about the work. How would you describe it to someone you were talking to on the phone who can’t see it?
Analyze
the visual elements and design principles as you did in the short paper. Think about the relationship between form, content and subject matter in your analysis. This will be helpful in your 'interpretation' of the work. Use the terminology you have learned in class, particularly terms in Chapters 2 -5. Your analysis should be based your own observations while viewing the work.
Interpretation
Follow your analysis with a subjective interpretation of the meaning of the work. How does the work make you feel? What do you think the content is? Go beyond “I like it” or “I don’t like it.”
Research
the artist. Historical and biographical information on the artist often provides clues into a works intended meaning. Carefully consider the purpose and context of the piece. Did the piece you selected have any particular political or cultural message? Was the artist making a statement?
Value Judgement
What do you think the artist's intentions were? Was this communicated? Does it have value? Can you recognize the aesthetic quality in the work?
Write the Final Paper:
The following will help you write your paper. It should be used as a guideline, not an outline for approaching your paper. This is very similar to the process used by art critics.
Identification:
Note the title of the work, the date, the artist (if known), medium, and size.
Description:
What do you see? As fully as possible, describe what you see.
What medium is used? What is it made of?
How big is it?
Go into detail about what you see. How would you describe it, in detail, to someone who had never seen it?
What subjects are represented?
It can be helpful to begin looking at a work of art from the middle and work your way out.
Analysis:
Describe the form of the work Explain how visual elements and principles of design are used in the work. The terms in chapters 2, 3 & 4 will be very helpful. Go back and look at the chapter outlines or Short Paper assignment. Use them to:
Describe the use of visual elements such as line, shape, color & space used in the pieces. For example: In what way is it balanced? Is it asymmetrical or symmetrical? What is emphasized? What seems to be the dominating vi.
For the Discussion Forums, you will read the questionstopics an.docxmecklenburgstrelitzh
For the Discussion Forums, you will read the questions/topics and, after completing the reading assignments, should be able to discuss your findings and share opinions.
Your posts should reflect academic, polished, respectful writing -- think of your posts as essays.
Points will be deducted for errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
You are to add to each Discussion Forum at least
twice
. One post is to be your original thought post on the questions/topics, and the second post is your response to someone else's post.
The response post should be just as substantive as your original thought post. Agreements, praise, and re-stating what either the original author or you wrote in the original thought posts do not count as substance and will not receive credit.
It is completely fine to agree/disagree and express your praise for the original author's points but remember that those statements will not count as substance in your response post. Think of it as a discussion you are having with that student -- how might you respond to what she/he said? You might relate some relevant personal experience or knowledge, a memory or idea invoked by their post, describe additional examples of the ideas/themes being discussed, or provide additional relevant information that perhaps the student did not include in their post. What relationships can you make between the content of their post and your own life?
Cutting and pasting information from the text, internet, or any other source is not allowed. Your posts should be written in your own words. This is a respectful forum for discussion. Foul language or posts in poor taste are not allowed. Repeated offenses will earn a zero for the discussion boards, and you may be banned from posting.
Topics/Questions:
1) What is the overall difference between the elements of form and the principles of design?
2) Describe how the two work together to form a composition.
3) Analyze a work of art from another chapter in the textbook (not Chapter 7) to describe how an artist uses both the elements and the principles to create a strong composition. You must be specific and thorough in your explanation to receive credit. Your analysis should include both the identifications and descriptions of the principles, including
how
the artist used the elements to convey the principles. Go beyond identification and thoroughly describe . See below for more information on that. Make sure to also identify the artwork with its title, artist's name, and date of creation.
4) Explain how your understanding of the principles of design helps you in experiencing and describing this work of art.
Organize your answers into an essay, making sure that each of the four prompts above is thoroughly addressed/answered.
***For part 3) of this discussion forum, since the visual elements are used to convey the principles of design, I recommend forming your analysis around the principles of design. In order to an.
The Legacy of Breton In A New Age by Master Terrance LindallBBaez1
Brave Destiny 2003 for the Future for Technocratic Surrealmageddon Destiny for Andre Breton Legacy in Agenda 21 Technocratic Great Reset for Prison Planet Earth Galactica! The Prophecy of the Surreal Blasphemous Desires from the Paradise Lost Governments!
Explore the multifaceted world of Muntadher Saleh, an Iraqi polymath renowned for his expertise in visual art, writing, design, and pharmacy. This SlideShare delves into his innovative contributions across various disciplines, showcasing his unique ability to blend traditional themes with modern aesthetics. Learn about his impactful artworks, thought-provoking literary pieces, and his vision as a Neo-Pop artist dedicated to raising awareness about Iraq's cultural heritage. Discover why Muntadher Saleh is celebrated as "The Last Polymath" and how his multidisciplinary talents continue to inspire and influence.
thGAP - BAbyss in Moderno!! Transgenic Human Germline Alternatives ProjectMarc Dusseiller Dusjagr
thGAP - Transgenic Human Germline Alternatives Project, presents an evening of input lectures, discussions and a performative workshop on artistic interventions for future scenarios of human genetic and inheritable modifications.
To begin our lecturers, Marc Dusseiller aka "dusjagr" and Rodrigo Martin Iglesias, will give an overview of their transdisciplinary practices, including the history of hackteria, a global network for sharing knowledge to involve artists in hands-on and Do-It-With-Others (DIWO) working with the lifesciences, and reflections on future scenarios from the 8-bit computer games of the 80ies to current real-world endeavous of genetically modifiying the human species.
We will then follow up with discussions and hands-on experiments on working with embryos, ovums, gametes, genetic materials from code to slime, in a creative and playful workshop setup, where all paticipant can collaborate on artistic interventions into the germline of a post-human future.
2137ad - Characters that live in Merindol and are at the center of main storiesluforfor
Kurgan is a russian expatriate that is secretly in love with Sonia Contado. Henry is a british soldier that took refuge in Merindol Colony in 2137ad. He is the lover of Sonia Contado.
The perfect Sundabet Slot mudah menang Promo new member Animated PDF for your conversation. Discover and Share the best GIFs on Tenor
Admin Ramah Cantik Aktif 24 Jam Nonstop siap melayani pemain member Sundabet login via apk sundabet rtp daftar slot gacor daftar
2137ad Merindol Colony Interiors where refugee try to build a seemengly norm...luforfor
This are the interiors of the Merindol Colony in 2137ad after the Climate Change Collapse and the Apocalipse Wars. Merindol is a small Colony in the Italian Alps where there are around 4000 humans. The Colony values mainly around meritocracy and selection by effort.
1. Mrs. Hurd Art Rm201
What things do you see in the art work? Describe the elements of art.
Identify materials used (techniques too).
Identify genre (portrait, still life, landscape, abstract?)
Explain everything you see, even if you don’t know what it is.
How are lines, shapes, colors, and textures used in the piece of art?
Find examples of unity through repetition. Look for a center of interest (focal point/ eye grabber) Is
there one? What is it?
What is going on in the artwork?
What is the purpose of the piece?
What is the artist saying?
Do you like this piece of art-WHY or WHY NOT?
Is this a quality piece of art? Why?
What is the best thing about this piece?
What is the worst thing about this piece?
Is the artist successful? Why?
Art Critique
Artist:
Title:
Date:
Name:___________________________
Use these steps to help you critique a piece of art, think, look, decide
1. Describe
2.Analyze
3.Interpret
4.Decide/Evaluate
2. Mrs. Hurd Art Rm201
43
21
Step 1: Describe
List everything you see, even if you
don’t know what it is. Ask yourself:
What do I see?
What colors are used?
What shapes are visible?
Where is the scene
What is the scene?
Are there any unknown objects?
Step 2: Analyze
Explain how what you see is being used
in the piece of art. Ask yourself:
How are the lines used?
How are the shapes working?
How are textures effective?
Are the colors/values appealing?
How does the viewer’s eye move
around the piece?
Step 3: Interpret
What is going on in the artwork?
Ask yourself:
What do I see happening?
How does this make me feel?
What is the most important part
of the piece?
Why did the artist create this
piece?
What does this art “say” to me?
Step 4: Decide
Do you like this piece of art?
Why or Why? Ask yourself:
What do I like about this piece?
What did the artist do best?
What do I dislike about this
piece?
What would I change if I were the
artist?