Fluorescence Quenching
                    Any process which decreases the fluorescence intensity of a sample

      Collision/
                                                        Static                                    Apparent
       Dynamic
                                                      Quenching                                   Quenching
      Quenching
Collision returns fluorophore to G.S.          Binding,                                         Optical density,
without photon emission,                       Complex formed is non-fluorescent                turbidity, etc not
Quencher must diffuse to fluorophore                                                            useful
during lifetime of excited state.              Amines, chlorinated hydrocarbons 
                                               excited-state charge-transfer complex.
Molecular oxygen  best                        Fluorescence from complex is quenched in
Paramagnetic, spin-orbit coupling,             polar solvents.
intersystem crossing to long-lived, easily
quenched triplet state.
Iodine, Bromine (heavy atoms)                          F0/F = 1 + KS[Q]         Stern-Volmer Eqn.

                                        intercept       slope
   F0/F = 1 + KDτ0[Q]
                                                                  F0/F
                                     Fluorescence lifetime
        KD = Kqτ0                    in the absence of                              KS or KD
                                     quencher
                                                                     1 --
                     Bimolecular quenching constant
                                                                                          [Q]
Deviation from Linearity


Linearity  all fluorophores are equally accessible to quenchers
     In this case, quenching is either Static or Dynamic but not both.
     How do we decide which mechanism is at play?
     Static                        –           Dynamic                     Bend towards x-axis  Quenching
     τ0/τ = 1                      --         τ0/τ = F0/F                  starts to saturate because few of
     Slope falls wit T             –          rises with T
     Absorption spectra changes –              no change
                                                                           the fluorophore molecules are
                                                                           inaccessible (How many Trp
                                                                           residues are on the surface of
                                                                           protein?)

 Bend towards y-axis  Combination of Static quenching and Dynamic quenching
 (second order in [Q])

            F0/F = (1 + KS[Q])(1 + KD[Q])
                                                                             Kapp
            F0/F = 1 + Kapp[Q]
                                                                                         KSKD
                                                                         KS + KD --
            Kapp = ((F0/F) – 1) / [Q] = KS + KD + KSKD [Q]
                                                                                                   [Q]
Application of Quenching
The Bimolecular Quenching constant reflects:
1. Efficiency of Quenching
2. Diffusion Coefficient of Quencher
3. Accessibility of Fluorophore to Quencher
     localization, membrane permeability

Here, we can see a change in protein
    conformation due to substrate binding
    because the extent of quenching changes.

Application of fluorescence quenching

  • 1.
    Fluorescence Quenching Any process which decreases the fluorescence intensity of a sample Collision/ Static Apparent Dynamic Quenching Quenching Quenching Collision returns fluorophore to G.S. Binding, Optical density, without photon emission, Complex formed is non-fluorescent turbidity, etc not Quencher must diffuse to fluorophore useful during lifetime of excited state. Amines, chlorinated hydrocarbons  excited-state charge-transfer complex. Molecular oxygen  best Fluorescence from complex is quenched in Paramagnetic, spin-orbit coupling, polar solvents. intersystem crossing to long-lived, easily quenched triplet state. Iodine, Bromine (heavy atoms) F0/F = 1 + KS[Q]  Stern-Volmer Eqn. intercept slope F0/F = 1 + KDτ0[Q] F0/F Fluorescence lifetime KD = Kqτ0 in the absence of KS or KD quencher 1 -- Bimolecular quenching constant [Q]
  • 2.
    Deviation from Linearity Linearity all fluorophores are equally accessible to quenchers In this case, quenching is either Static or Dynamic but not both. How do we decide which mechanism is at play? Static – Dynamic Bend towards x-axis  Quenching τ0/τ = 1 -- τ0/τ = F0/F starts to saturate because few of Slope falls wit T – rises with T Absorption spectra changes – no change the fluorophore molecules are inaccessible (How many Trp residues are on the surface of protein?) Bend towards y-axis  Combination of Static quenching and Dynamic quenching (second order in [Q]) F0/F = (1 + KS[Q])(1 + KD[Q]) Kapp F0/F = 1 + Kapp[Q] KSKD KS + KD -- Kapp = ((F0/F) – 1) / [Q] = KS + KD + KSKD [Q] [Q]
  • 3.
    Application of Quenching TheBimolecular Quenching constant reflects: 1. Efficiency of Quenching 2. Diffusion Coefficient of Quencher 3. Accessibility of Fluorophore to Quencher  localization, membrane permeability Here, we can see a change in protein conformation due to substrate binding because the extent of quenching changes.