This document discusses antitrust policy and competition law. It provides definitions of antitrust law, outlines its three main elements which are prohibiting anti-competitive agreements, banning abusive behavior by dominant firms, and supervising large mergers. It also discusses objectives of antitrust policy, anti-competitive practices, federal antitrust laws in the US and India's Competition Act. Specific cases involving Microsoft, Standard Oil, IBM, and AT&T are analyzed. The document also summarizes criticisms of antitrust laws.
Competition Law awareness and enforcement are increasing day by day. Long-term, sustainable growth of big organization, corporation and companies warrants attention to competition law while strategising their growth.
National Webinar at the Centre for Corporate and Competition Law at Symbiosis Law School, Hyderabad on the topic ”Abuse of Dominance in Competition Law” on 27th August, 2021 by Shri Dhanendra Kumar, 1st Chairperson, Competition Commission of India (CCI).
Competition Law awareness and enforcement are increasing day by day. Long-term, sustainable growth of big organization, corporation and companies warrants attention to competition law while strategising their growth.
National Webinar at the Centre for Corporate and Competition Law at Symbiosis Law School, Hyderabad on the topic ”Abuse of Dominance in Competition Law” on 27th August, 2021 by Shri Dhanendra Kumar, 1st Chairperson, Competition Commission of India (CCI).
Comprehensive discussion about Traditional Philosophical theories applied in business. This presentation primarily focus on the first kind of Consequentialism which is the Ethical Egoism.
Dominant Position :Competition Law(Competition Act,2002)Bibhu Manik
The Article deals with Definition,Abuse of Dominant Position,Dominant Factors in Relevant Market and its analysis with Recent Cases regarding Competition Act,2002
These slides are from McKonly & Asbury's webinar entitled “Professional Ethics: The Three Monkeys in the Room” which took place on Thursday, May 14, 2015.
CASE STUDY ON MICROSOFT ANTITRUST CASEShivajiRao11
CASE STUDY ON MICROSOFT ANTITRUST CASE
A Case Study: In 1998, the United States Department of Justice filed suit against Microsoft, in essence claiming that Microsoft included too much functionality in its operating systems and thus prevented application vendors from competing.
Comprehensive discussion about Traditional Philosophical theories applied in business. This presentation primarily focus on the first kind of Consequentialism which is the Ethical Egoism.
Dominant Position :Competition Law(Competition Act,2002)Bibhu Manik
The Article deals with Definition,Abuse of Dominant Position,Dominant Factors in Relevant Market and its analysis with Recent Cases regarding Competition Act,2002
These slides are from McKonly & Asbury's webinar entitled “Professional Ethics: The Three Monkeys in the Room” which took place on Thursday, May 14, 2015.
CASE STUDY ON MICROSOFT ANTITRUST CASEShivajiRao11
CASE STUDY ON MICROSOFT ANTITRUST CASE
A Case Study: In 1998, the United States Department of Justice filed suit against Microsoft, in essence claiming that Microsoft included too much functionality in its operating systems and thus prevented application vendors from competing.
Case 24-7United States v. Microsoft CorporationUnited States Cou.docxannandleola
Case 24-7United States v. Microsoft Corporation
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit 253 F.3d 34 (2001) The authors recommend a close reading of the facts of United States v. Microsoft set out earlier in this chapter.
Section 2 of the Sherman Act makes it unlawful for a firm to “monopolize.” The offense of monopolization has two elements: (1) the possession of monopoly power in the relevant market and (2) the willful acquisition or maintenance of that power as distinguished from growth or development as a consequence of a superior product, business acumen, or historic accident.
The district court found that Microsoft possessed monopoly power in the market for Intel-compatible PC operating systems. Focusing primarily on Microsoft’s efforts to suppress Netscape Navigator’s threat to its operating systems monopoly, the court also found that Microsoft maintained its power not through competition on the merits, but through unlawful means. Microsoft challenged both conclusions on appeal.
Per Curiam (by the Whole Court of Appeals) We begin by considering whether Microsoft possesses monopoly power and finding that it does, we turn to the question [of] whether it maintained this power through anticompetitive means. Agreeing with the District Court that the company behaved anticompetitively and that these actions contributed to the maintenance of its monopoly power, we affirm the court’s finding of liability for monopolization.
Monopoly Power
While merely possessing monopoly power is not itself an antitrust violation, it is a necessary element of a monopolization charge. The Supreme Court has defined monopoly power as the power to control prices or exclude competition. More precisely, a firm is a monopolist if it can profitably raise prices substantially above the competitive level[;] where [there is] evidence that a firm has in fact probably done so, the existence of monopoly power is clear. Because such direct proof is only rarely available, courts more typically examine market structure in search of circumstantial evidence of monopoly power. Under this structural approach monopoly power may be inferred from a firm’s possession of a dominant share of a relevant market that is protected by entry barriers.
“Entry barriers” are factors (such as certain regulatory requirements) that prevent new rivals from timely responding to an increase in price above the competitive level.
The District Court considered these structural factors and concluded that Microsoft possesses monopoly power in a relevant market. Defining the market as Intel-compatible PC operating systems, the District Court found that Microsoft has a greater than 95 percent share. It also found the company’s market position protected by a substantial entry barrier.
Microsoft argues that the District Court incorrectly defined the relevant market. It also claims that there is no barrier to entry in that market. Alternatively, Microsoft argues that because the.
How Will Microsoft’s Fight with the FTC Affect Your Investments?InvestingTips
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is not waiting for monopolies to dominate industries and then go after them. They are now trying to block takeover and mergers before they create or strengthen monopolies. The most recent company in the crosshairs of the FTC is Microsoft. How will Microsoft’s fight with the FTC affect your investments?
https://youtu.be/v9e6VjuyEME
Intellectual Property v. Competition Law Policy in IndiaMehek Kapoor
1.Emerging Jurisprudence
2.Examining the Relationship Between IP & Competition Policy
3.Regulation of IP Related Competition Issues:
3.1. Abuse of Dominant Position
3.2. Refusal to License
3.3. Excessive Pricing
3.4. Tying Arrangements
4.Mechanisms to Control IP Abuse
4.1. Parallel Imports
4.2. Compulsory Licensing
5.Conclusion & Suggestions
This presentation by Geoffrey A. Manne, Founder & Executive Director of the International Center for Law and Economics was made during the discussion on "Big Data: Bringing competition policy to the digital era" held during the 126th meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 29 November 2016. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/daf/competition/big-data-bringing-competition-policy-to-the-digital-era.htm
110 CHAPTER FOURLegal, Regulatory, and Political Iss.docxpaynetawnya
110
CHAPTER FOUR
Legal, Regulatory,
and Political Issues
Chapter Objectives
●● To understand the rationale for
government regulation of business
●● To examine the key legislation that
structures the legal environment for
business
●● To analyze the role of regulatory agencies
in the enforcement of public policy
●● To compare the costs and benefits of
regulation
●● To examine how business participates in
and influences public policy
●● To describe the government’s approach
for legal and ethical compliance
Chapter Outline
Government’s Influence on Business
The Contemporary Political Environment
The Government’s Strategic Approach for
Legal and Ethical Compliance
02/18/2018 - RS0000000000000000000000973322 - BUSINESS and SOCIETY 5th edition
111
In the technology industry, protecting one’s intellectual
property through patents is crucial to the survival of
a company. A patent gives an organization such as
Microsoft a temporary monopoly over a new technol-
ogy. Patents are intended to reward firms for the risks
they take in developing new products. They not only
allow the firms to recoup their investment but also
give them the chance to earn a significant profit. This
prompts technology firms to constantly innovate and
stay ahead of the competition by patenting new items.
Companies will often file lawsuits seeking dam-
ages from those they believe violated their intellectual
property rights. One well-publicized case occurred
between two titans of the cell phone industry, Apple
and Samsung. After Apple introduced its iconic iPhone,
Samsung came out with its own smartphone called
Galaxy S. Apple filed a lawsuit against Samsung, accus-
ing it of violating its iPhone patent by copying many
components of the iPhone, including the rectangular
shape; the black color of the phone; the tap to zoom,
the flip to rotate, the slide to scroll features; and so
on. It also claimed that Samsung copied features of its
iPad product.
Samsung countersued, claiming that many of
these components had already been patented by
Samsung; thus, Samsung—and not Apple—held the
intellectual property rights. The lawsuit soon snow-
balled, with suits being filed in the United States, South
Korea, Germany, Japan, and other areas. Many of these
countries came to different conclusions. For instance,
the United States found Samsung guilty of intellectual
property violations and ordered Samsung to pay Apple
$1 billion in damages (this was later reduced). However,
South Korea determined that Apple violated two
of Samsung’s patents, while Samsung violated one
of Apple’s. The United Kingdom ruled in favor of
Samsung, while Germany banned sales of the Galaxy
Tab 2.0 because of its similarities to Apple’s iPad 2.
The different court rulings demonstrate the com-
plexities of international regulations. The ethical and
legal standards of intellectual property vary from coun-
try to country, mak ...
Von Hayek's views on Monopolies and the anti-trust lawAditya Ganesh
This presentation examines Von Hayek's views on Government intervention in controlling monopolies, taking the example of the US DoJ v/s Microsoft anti-trust lawsuit.
These slides by the OECD Competition Division introduce the OECD background note presented during the discussion on "Big Data: Bringing competition policy to the digital era" held during the 126th meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 29 November 2016. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/daf/competition/big-data-bringing-competition-policy-to-the-digital-era.htm
Enterprise Excellence is Inclusive Excellence.pdfKaiNexus
Enterprise excellence and inclusive excellence are closely linked, and real-world challenges have shown that both are essential to the success of any organization. To achieve enterprise excellence, organizations must focus on improving their operations and processes while creating an inclusive environment that engages everyone. In this interactive session, the facilitator will highlight commonly established business practices and how they limit our ability to engage everyone every day. More importantly, though, participants will likely gain increased awareness of what we can do differently to maximize enterprise excellence through deliberate inclusion.
What is Enterprise Excellence?
Enterprise Excellence is a holistic approach that's aimed at achieving world-class performance across all aspects of the organization.
What might I learn?
A way to engage all in creating Inclusive Excellence. Lessons from the US military and their parallels to the story of Harry Potter. How belt systems and CI teams can destroy inclusive practices. How leadership language invites people to the party. There are three things leaders can do to engage everyone every day: maximizing psychological safety to create environments where folks learn, contribute, and challenge the status quo.
Who might benefit? Anyone and everyone leading folks from the shop floor to top floor.
Dr. William Harvey is a seasoned Operations Leader with extensive experience in chemical processing, manufacturing, and operations management. At Michelman, he currently oversees multiple sites, leading teams in strategic planning and coaching/practicing continuous improvement. William is set to start his eighth year of teaching at the University of Cincinnati where he teaches marketing, finance, and management. William holds various certifications in change management, quality, leadership, operational excellence, team building, and DiSC, among others.
RMD24 | Retail media: hoe zet je dit in als je geen AH of Unilever bent? Heid...BBPMedia1
Grote partijen zijn al een tijdje onderweg met retail media. Ondertussen worden in dit domein ook de kansen zichtbaar voor andere spelers in de markt. Maar met die kansen ontstaan ook vragen: Zelf retail media worden of erop adverteren? In welke fase van de funnel past het en hoe integreer je het in een mediaplan? Wat is nu precies het verschil met marketplaces en Programmatic ads? In dit half uur beslechten we de dilemma's en krijg je antwoorden op wanneer het voor jou tijd is om de volgende stap te zetten.
Personal Brand Statement:
As an Army veteran dedicated to lifelong learning, I bring a disciplined, strategic mindset to my pursuits. I am constantly expanding my knowledge to innovate and lead effectively. My journey is driven by a commitment to excellence, and to make a meaningful impact in the world.
Taurus Zodiac Sign_ Personality Traits and Sign Dates.pptxmy Pandit
Explore the world of the Taurus zodiac sign. Learn about their stability, determination, and appreciation for beauty. Discover how Taureans' grounded nature and hardworking mindset define their unique personality.
Unveiling the Secrets How Does Generative AI Work.pdfSam H
At its core, generative artificial intelligence relies on the concept of generative models, which serve as engines that churn out entirely new data resembling their training data. It is like a sculptor who has studied so many forms found in nature and then uses this knowledge to create sculptures from his imagination that have never been seen before anywhere else. If taken to cyberspace, gans work almost the same way.
Improving profitability for small businessBen Wann
In this comprehensive presentation, we will explore strategies and practical tips for enhancing profitability in small businesses. Tailored to meet the unique challenges faced by small enterprises, this session covers various aspects that directly impact the bottom line. Attendees will learn how to optimize operational efficiency, manage expenses, and increase revenue through innovative marketing and customer engagement techniques.
Falcon stands out as a top-tier P2P Invoice Discounting platform in India, bridging esteemed blue-chip companies and eager investors. Our goal is to transform the investment landscape in India by establishing a comprehensive destination for borrowers and investors with diverse profiles and needs, all while minimizing risk. What sets Falcon apart is the elimination of intermediaries such as commercial banks and depository institutions, allowing investors to enjoy higher yields.
Explore our most comprehensive guide on lookback analysis at SafePaaS, covering access governance and how it can transform modern ERP audits. Browse now!
Premium MEAN Stack Development Solutions for Modern BusinessesSynapseIndia
Stay ahead of the curve with our premium MEAN Stack Development Solutions. Our expert developers utilize MongoDB, Express.js, AngularJS, and Node.js to create modern and responsive web applications. Trust us for cutting-edge solutions that drive your business growth and success.
Know more: https://www.synapseindia.com/technology/mean-stack-development-company.html
RMD24 | Debunking the non-endemic revenue myth Marvin Vacquier Droop | First ...BBPMedia1
Marvin neemt je in deze presentatie mee in de voordelen van non-endemic advertising op retail media netwerken. Hij brengt ook de uitdagingen in beeld die de markt op dit moment heeft op het gebied van retail media voor niet-leveranciers.
Retail media wordt gezien als het nieuwe advertising-medium en ook mediabureaus richten massaal retail media-afdelingen op. Merken die niet in de betreffende winkel liggen staan ook nog niet in de rij om op de retail media netwerken te adverteren. Marvin belicht de uitdagingen die er zijn om echt aansluiting te vinden op die markt van non-endemic advertising.
Remote sensing and monitoring are changing the mining industry for the better. These are providing innovative solutions to long-standing challenges. Those related to exploration, extraction, and overall environmental management by mining technology companies Odisha. These technologies make use of satellite imaging, aerial photography and sensors to collect data that might be inaccessible or from hazardous locations. With the use of this technology, mining operations are becoming increasingly efficient. Let us gain more insight into the key aspects associated with remote sensing and monitoring when it comes to mining.
2. Microsoft Confidential
AGENDA
Antitrust policy
Objectives of Antitrust policy
Why promote competition
Anti-competitive practices
Federal Antitrust Laws in U.S
Competition Act in India
Background of India
Merger Policy
Microsoft-Yahoo merger case
History of cases
Microsoft cases
Criticisms of Antitrust law 2
3. Microsoft Confidential
ANTITRUST POLICY
ANTITRUST LAW
Government actions designed to promote competition among firms in the
economy.
Antitrust law also known as competition law, has three main elements:
1) prohibiting agreements that restrict free trading and competition between business
entities.
2) banning abusive behaviour by a firm dominating a market, or anti-competitive practices
that tend to lead to such a dominant position.
3)supervising the mergers and acquisitions of large corporations. Transactions that are
considered to threaten the competitive process can be prohibited altogether.
3
TRUST
A group or collection of firms who agree to coordinate efforts for
the purpose of restricting output and raising prices/profit. Also
known as cartels
7. Microsoft Confidential 7
Anti-competitive practices
Product
bundling
Predatory
Pricing
Exclusive dealing
PROFITS
by reducing
competition
Price fixing
Collusion
Refusal to deal
(Group boycott)
Anti-competitive
practices
2007: British Airways and Korean Air Lines
fined by regulators for price-fixing in fuel
surcharges ,cargo & passenger rates2005: WAL-MART accused of predatory pricing
by small retailers & labour unions
8. Microsoft Confidential 8
Frequently asked questions
?
?
The gasoline stations in my area have
increased their prices the same amount
and at the same time. Is that price-fixing?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
I operate two stores that sell recorded
music. My business is being ruined by
giant discount store chains that sell
their products for less than my
wholesale cost. I thought there were
laws against price discrimination, but I
can’t afford the legal fees to fight the
big corporations. Can you help?
I operate two stores that sell recorded
music. My business is being ruined by
giant discount store chains that sell
their products for less than my
wholesale cost. I thought there were
laws against price discrimination, but I
can’t afford the legal fees to fight the
big corporations. Can you help?
11. Microsoft Confidential
Competition Act in India
Finance Minister, P.Chidambaram (2003) highlighted the need to have a strong legal
system and said
“A world class legal system is absolutely essential to support an economy
that aims to be world class. India needs to take a hard look at its
commercial laws and the system of dispensing justice in commercial
matters.”
With the zeal Government went ahead and enacted the Competition Act 2002
11
12. Microsoft Confidential
Background of India
Competition (Amendment) Act,
mid 2008
Competition Act, 2002
MRTP Act, 1969
Monopolies & Restrictive Trade Practices Act
The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 focused in curbing monopolies
1999: A committee (CCI-Competition Commission of India) was setup by govt to examine the MRTP Act 1969 &
for shifting the focus of the law from curbing monopolies to promoting competition
Following which the Competition Act, 2002 was enacted and notified in January 2003.
.
12
13. Microsoft Confidential
Market share
Google has the lion's share of the
search market
13
SOURCE :
As of Jan 2008
Merger Policy
Govt has to decide whether a merger reduces competition in the mkt
14. Microsoft Confidential
MICROSOFT-YAHOO MERGER
• MICROSOFT:"The combination of Microsoft and Yahoo will create a more competitive marketplace
by establishing a compelling No. 2 competitor for Internet search & online advertising"
• Google is prevented by the antitrust laws from buying Yahoo or buying this business from Yahoo
• GOOGLE: is concerned that Microsoft can "unfairly limit the ability of consumers to freely access
competitors' email and instant messaging services. Microsoft + Yahoo = Antitrust
• Microsoft would need approval from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in the U.S. & the
Competition Commission in the EU for the deal to pass through
• Google and a Microsoft-Yahoo would control 80% to 90% of the search market OLIGOPOLY14
15. Microsoft Confidential
HISTORY OF CASES
Standard Oil: Monopolized the oil refining
industry illegally. In 1911 it was broken into
separate entities (Exxon, Mobil, Chevron, Amoco)
IBM: U.S Govt brought antitrust action against IBM in 1969
because of its dominance in mainframe computer mkt.Govt
withdrew the case later in 1982 when it faced stiff competition
from smaller computers, Apple Computers etc
AT&T: U.S Govt took action against AT&T in 1970s as it was the only
significant supplier telephone service. It was broken apart & had to
compete with MCI & Sprint.
This increase in competition lowered the cost.
15
16. MICROSOFT CASES
European Union
Microsoft antitrust
case
Microsoft has been hit with an €899m ($1.4bn) fine for failure to
comply with European regulators' demands to end allegedly anti-
competitive business practices.MS failed to provide information
necessary for competing networking software to interact fully with
Windows desktops and servers & also failed to unbundle Windows
media player from Windows
Govt’s interest in Microsoft's affairs had begun in 1991 with an inquiry
by the FTC over whether Microsoft was abusing its monopoly on the
PC operating system market
1998 – Case filed against MS when it bundled Internet Explorer
along with its OS.
This restricted the mkt for competing web browsers( Netscape
navigator etc.). Order was reversed in 2001 when MS agreed to provide
billions of software & services to public schools
United States
Microsoft antitrust
case
18. Microsoft Confidential 18
•Antitrust Paradox: Original intention of antitrust laws was consumer welfare &
protection of competition rather than competitors
•Paradox of antitrust enforcement was that legal intervention artificially raised prices by
protecting inefficient competitors from competition .
•Only a few acts should be prohibited, namely price fixing, mergers that create
monopolies & pricing predatorily, while allowing practices such as price discrimination
•The late Nobel economist believed that Antitrust laws do far more harm than good
•“Antitrust case against Microsoft set a dangerous precedent that foreshadowed
increasing government regulation of what was formerly an industry that was relatively
free of government intrusion and that future technological progress in the industry will
be impeded as a result”
•Changed views overtime
•Antitrust laws prevent firms from actions that may benefit society due to fear of
antitrust violations
•Condemns the Sherman Act as stifling innovation and harming society
•"No one will ever know what new products, processes, machines, and cost-saving
mergers failed to come into existence, killed by the Sherman Act before they were born”
Robert Bork
Milton Friedman
Alan Greenspan
Criticisms of Antitrust Laws