Vertical integration of monitoring, evaluation and learning (MEL) in adaptation policy and planning is important to connect top-down and bottom-up processes across global, national and local levels. MEL systems can help communicate adaptation progress and priorities between levels but current practices often overlook local contexts and actors. Effective vertical integration requires adapting MEL frameworks and indicators to local needs, strengthening linkages between levels through collaborative monitoring and evaluation, and ensuring evidence and learning are shared bidirectionally.
Presentation by Dr. Orville Grey, Head of Secretariat, NAP Global Network (IISD), at the Coalition Of Low-Lying Atoll Nations on Climate Change (CANCC) peer learning cohort workshop on “National Adaptation Planning With a Focus on Coastal Adaptation” in North Malé Atoll, Maldives, between May 1 - May 3, 2024.
Developing metrics for climate adaptation – Applying the TAMD framework | Sim...NAP Global Network
Presentation by Simon Anderson, IIED, on "Developing metrics for climate adaptation – Applying the TAMD framework" at the National Adaptation Plan (NAP) Global Network's Targeted Topics Forum in Lilongwe, Malawi, in February 2017.
Building national systems for adaptation Monitoring, Evaulation and Learning ...NAP Global Network
This presentation was given during the parallel session "Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning in the Context of Global Processes and Reporting Progress on NAPs," ," as part of NAP Expo 23, held in Santiago, Chile, from March 27-30, 2023.
Enabling factors for Vertical Integration in NAP processNAP Global Network
Presentation given by Mauricio Luna-Rodríguez, Policy Advisor, Climate Change Adaptation Governance, NAP Global Network, IISD, as part of the NAP Global Network's Peer Learning Summit on Vertical Integration in the NAP Processes, held in Nairobi, Kenya, from October 11 to 13, 2023.
The document discusses monitoring progress towards research outcomes. It outlines setting benchmarks and indicators to track if targets are being achieved. Key points:
- Define indicators for each key outcome and state the baseline level.
- Describe intermediary stages and how, who, and when progress will be measured.
- By the end of 2013, conclusions should be made about how research results contributed to development outcomes or triggered changes, and evidence provided for continuation.
- Questions are raised about attributing changes correctly and dealing with multiple factors. Support is requested in operationalizing outcomes for effective monitoring.
Findings Relevant to the GEF IW Learn ConfernceIwl Pcu
The document summarizes the findings of a 2004 study on the GEF International Waters Programme. Some key points:
- The study assessed impacts of projects on transboundary waters, approaches used, and lessons learned to improve operations.
- There were 95 full-sized projects totaling $691.59 million in GEF funding and $1.46 billion in co-financing, indicating a leverage ratio of 1:2.
- The study evaluated projects in regions like the Black Sea, La Plata River, African Great Lakes, and East Asian seas to identify lessons learned and make recommendations to strengthen the program.
This document discusses enhancing results for National Adaptation Planning (NAP) processes. It notes that NAPs are highly contextual, making universal measurement and verification systems difficult. It is also challenging to establish a clear theory of change for adaptation due to lack of clear causal pathways. The document proposes focusing on outcomes such as strengthening country capacity to implement NAPs, prioritizing adaptation in national plans, and enhancing capacity for adaptation planning and implementation. It discusses tools for monitoring and reporting on NAP implementation and challenges such as delays. Solutions proposed include ensuring quality project design and establishing effective monitoring and evaluation systems.
Presentation by Dr. Orville Grey, Head of Secretariat, NAP Global Network (IISD), at the Coalition Of Low-Lying Atoll Nations on Climate Change (CANCC) peer learning cohort workshop on “National Adaptation Planning With a Focus on Coastal Adaptation” in North Malé Atoll, Maldives, between May 1 - May 3, 2024.
Developing metrics for climate adaptation – Applying the TAMD framework | Sim...NAP Global Network
Presentation by Simon Anderson, IIED, on "Developing metrics for climate adaptation – Applying the TAMD framework" at the National Adaptation Plan (NAP) Global Network's Targeted Topics Forum in Lilongwe, Malawi, in February 2017.
Building national systems for adaptation Monitoring, Evaulation and Learning ...NAP Global Network
This presentation was given during the parallel session "Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning in the Context of Global Processes and Reporting Progress on NAPs," ," as part of NAP Expo 23, held in Santiago, Chile, from March 27-30, 2023.
Enabling factors for Vertical Integration in NAP processNAP Global Network
Presentation given by Mauricio Luna-Rodríguez, Policy Advisor, Climate Change Adaptation Governance, NAP Global Network, IISD, as part of the NAP Global Network's Peer Learning Summit on Vertical Integration in the NAP Processes, held in Nairobi, Kenya, from October 11 to 13, 2023.
The document discusses monitoring progress towards research outcomes. It outlines setting benchmarks and indicators to track if targets are being achieved. Key points:
- Define indicators for each key outcome and state the baseline level.
- Describe intermediary stages and how, who, and when progress will be measured.
- By the end of 2013, conclusions should be made about how research results contributed to development outcomes or triggered changes, and evidence provided for continuation.
- Questions are raised about attributing changes correctly and dealing with multiple factors. Support is requested in operationalizing outcomes for effective monitoring.
Findings Relevant to the GEF IW Learn ConfernceIwl Pcu
The document summarizes the findings of a 2004 study on the GEF International Waters Programme. Some key points:
- The study assessed impacts of projects on transboundary waters, approaches used, and lessons learned to improve operations.
- There were 95 full-sized projects totaling $691.59 million in GEF funding and $1.46 billion in co-financing, indicating a leverage ratio of 1:2.
- The study evaluated projects in regions like the Black Sea, La Plata River, African Great Lakes, and East Asian seas to identify lessons learned and make recommendations to strengthen the program.
This document discusses enhancing results for National Adaptation Planning (NAP) processes. It notes that NAPs are highly contextual, making universal measurement and verification systems difficult. It is also challenging to establish a clear theory of change for adaptation due to lack of clear causal pathways. The document proposes focusing on outcomes such as strengthening country capacity to implement NAPs, prioritizing adaptation in national plans, and enhancing capacity for adaptation planning and implementation. It discusses tools for monitoring and reporting on NAP implementation and challenges such as delays. Solutions proposed include ensuring quality project design and establishing effective monitoring and evaluation systems.
What to Learn? How to Learn? Results from the River Basin Breakout SessionsIwl Pcu
This document summarizes discussions from breakout sessions at a conference on managing the Mekong River Basin. The sessions focused on topics related to transboundary water governance, including how to build trust between countries, develop legal agreements, balance national and regional interests, ensure public participation, assess environmental flows, and develop decision support systems. Recommendations included using economic tools to evaluate costs and benefits, creating incentives for cost sharing, and establishing monitoring and evaluation systems to track both environmental and socioeconomic indicators. Challenges with monitoring included establishing meaningful indicators and ensuring sustainability after projects end.
This document discusses metrics for measuring the success and effectiveness of adaptation efforts at different levels, from local to national to global. It notes that while measuring adaptation is important for accountability and learning, there is no universally accepted metric. Frameworks have used indicators of processes, outcomes, and vulnerability/resilience but these may not translate across scales. The document explores how countries are developing their own metrics and indicators in adaptation strategies and calls for balancing policy and practice through narrative explanations to justify measures. It also discusses ensuring coherence between adaptation measurement and SDG indicators for sustainable development. Key challenges raised include quantifying non-economic impacts of adaptation and uncertainty around long-term climate trends and impacts.
This document discusses metrics for measuring the success and effectiveness of adaptation efforts at different levels, from local to national to global. It notes that while measuring adaptation is important for accountability, learning, and targeting funds, there is no universally accepted metric. Frameworks have used indicators of processes, outcomes, and vulnerability, but these may not translate across scales. The document explores how countries are developing their own frameworks and indicators, with local measures needing contextualization. Ensuring coherence across scales and linking to SDGs requires balancing concepts and practices, using both process and results indicators over long time horizons, and strengthening statistical capacities. Key challenges include fully capturing costs and benefits, uncertainties of climate impacts, and developing more outcome-oriented indicators of long-
Monitoring, evaluation, and learning (MEL) systems for National Adaptation Plan (NAP) processes are essential for countries to track, assess and learn from their progress on adaptation. MEL systems can help countries to understand the effectiveness of their NAP processes, support mutual accountability and transparency to stakeholders, and contribute to learning to accelerate adaptation actions.
The document presents a monitoring and evaluation tool developed by the Least Developed Countries Expert Group (LEG) to assess progress, effectiveness, and gaps in the process of formulating and implementing National Adaptation Plans (NAPs). The tool defines 10 essential functions that encapsulate the expected outcomes of the NAP process. It then establishes generic metrics that can be applied to each function to monitor progress over time and identify areas needing improvement. The tool is intended to help countries strengthen adaptation planning and implementation through a flexible, learning-based approach.
The document summarizes discussions from a joint stocktaking mission on Cambodia's National Adaptation Plan (NAP) process by the NAP Global Support Programme and GIZ.
Key points discussed include recommendations to improve the NAP process, such as developing joint activities across sectors and a roadmap. Main objectives of the NAP process according to UNFCCC guidelines are to reduce vulnerability to climate change impacts and integrate adaptation into policies and planning.
A gap analysis found Cambodia's process is not yet launched and lacks consistent climate scenarios, vulnerability assessments, and a long-term implementation strategy. The debriefing meeting proposed strategy areas and a roadmap to establish the NAP process and provide an overarching framework for adaptation
Introduction to the NAP Global Network Webinar Series | Sector Integration in...NAP Global Network
Presentation by Hayley Price-Kelly, IISD, introducing the NAP Global Network webinar series and the topic "Sector Integration in the NAP Process: A Spectrum of Approaches."
You can watch a recording of the webinar here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCTfrhYx13o&feature=youtu.be
This document provides an overview of the National Adaptation Plan (NAP) process, which aims to integrate climate change adaptation into development planning at the national, sectoral, and local levels. Over 90 countries have initiated NAP processes to assess climate risks, identify adaptation priorities, and enhance coordination on adaptation actions. The NAP process is intended to be strategic, coordinated, iterative, country-driven, and participatory to effectively reduce vulnerability to climate impacts over the medium and long term.
Using case-based methods to assess scalability and sustainability: Lessons fr...JSI
Overview of the SC4CCM project and end-line evaluation questions focused on scalability and sustainability. Methodological approaches including case selection strategies, mixed method approaches, within-case and cross-case analysis processes. (Sangeeta Mookherji, GWU)
RPN 2022 Manila: Session 3.3 David Annandale DDA Consulting.pdfOECD Environment
The document discusses strategic environmental assessment (SEA) and its role in infrastructure planning. SEA is a process used to evaluate the environmental impacts of policies, plans, and programs early in decision making. It can identify sustainable alternatives and prevent costly mistakes compared to project-level environmental impact assessments. The benefits of SEA include cheaper and more effective assessments, identifying options to facilitate sustainable development, and improving governance. SEA can be applied to infrastructure planning at various levels and sectors. Government agencies are typically responsible for conducting SEA to inform infrastructure planning. The document provides examples of SEA application in Myanmar and Mongolia.
PEG M&E tool: a tool for monitoring and reviewing Progress, Effectiveness & G...Tariq A. Deen
The session will provide details on: the tool developed by the LEG for monitoring and evaluating progress, effectiveness and gaps (PEG M&E tool) and its application in the process to formulate and implement NAPs; and the best practices for developing monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems for adaptation at the national level. It will also look at the experiences of countries in developing and applying M&E systems at their national levels.
PEG M&E tool: a tool for monitoring and reviewing Progress, Effectiveness & ...NAP Events
Presented by: Thinley Namgyel
8.3 Monitoring and evaluation
The session will provide details on: the tool developed by the LEG for monitoring and evaluating progress, effectiveness and gaps (PEG M&E tool) and its application in the process to formulate and implement NAPs; and the best practices for developing monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems for adaptation at the national level. It will also look at the experiences of countries in developing and applying M&E systems at their national levels.
Monitoring & Evaluation of National Adaptation: Key challenges and emerging s...NAP Global Network
Presented by Julie Dekens, IISD/NAP Global Network, in September 2020 at the Virtual Learning Event on Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) for National Adaptation in Pacific Small Island Developing States organized by organized by the NAP Global Network in collaboration with the Pacific Resilience Partnership (PRP)
NAP Expo - Delivering effective and adequate adaptation.pptxNAP Global Network
The Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), the United Nations Development Program (UNDP), the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) and the NAP Global Network propose to bring best practices from their respective NAP programmes and projects to showcase how the NAP process can drive transformational adaptation at the local, sub-national and national levels.
Self-assessment: Planning to implementation in the NAP process + integrating ...NAP Global Network
Presentation given by Anne Hammill, Vice-President, IISD (NAP Global Network Secretariat), as part of the Network's Peer Learning Forum on “The Transition from Planning to Implementation in the NAP Process,” held in Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe, from February 27-29, 2024
Monitoring and Evaluation of Adaptation: Overview | Angelica V. OspinaNAP Global Network
Presentation by Angelica V. Ospina, IISD, on "Monitoring and Evaluation of Adaptation: Overview" at the National Adaptation Plan (NAP) Global Network's Targeted Topics Forum in Lilongwe, Malawi, in February 2017.
This document provides an overview of Result Based Project Design and Management (RBM). RBM is a project management strategy used by the UN to ensure activities contribute to desired results. It measures actual changes rather than just outputs, and includes all stakeholders. The RBM cycle includes setting a vision based on data, defining a results framework with inputs, activities, outputs and outcomes, and planning monitoring with indicators, targets and verification. The document provides examples of an RBM results framework and steps for applying RBM to project design, including identifying issues, developing the framework, and monitoring planning.
Developing National Adaptation Monitoring and Evaluation SystemsNAP Global Network
Presentation by Timo Leiter, GIZ, for the webinar "Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) in the National Adaptation Plan (NAP) Process."
You can watch a recording of the webinar here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIqbygK6obE
Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) is important for tracking the progress and determining the effectiveness of ecosystem-based adaptation (EbA) projects. There are four key steps to designing and implementing an M&E system for EbA: 1) developing a results framework using a Theory of Change, 2) defining indicators, baselines and targets, 3) operationalizing the M&E system, and 4) using and communicating the results. Undertaking M&E contributes to the adaptive management, learning, and sustainability of EbA actions.
Presentation by Sapolu Tetoa and Semisi Tonga, Government of Tuvalu, at the Coalition Of Low-Lying Atoll Nations on Climate Change (CANCC) peer learning cohort workshop on “National Adaptation Planning With a Focus on Coastal Adaptation” in North Malé Atoll, Maldives, between May 1 - May 3, 2024.
Scaling up coastal adaptation in Maldives through the NAP processNAP Global Network
Presentation by Ahmed Jameel (AJ) and Ibrahim Faiz, Water Solutions Ltd., at the Coalition Of Low-Lying Atoll Nations on Climate Change (CANCC) peer learning cohort workshop on “National Adaptation Planning With a Focus on Coastal Adaptation” in North Malé Atoll, Maldives, between May 1 - May 3, 2024.
More Related Content
Similar to Andes Resilientes | Vertical integration of MEL in adaptation policy & planning
What to Learn? How to Learn? Results from the River Basin Breakout SessionsIwl Pcu
This document summarizes discussions from breakout sessions at a conference on managing the Mekong River Basin. The sessions focused on topics related to transboundary water governance, including how to build trust between countries, develop legal agreements, balance national and regional interests, ensure public participation, assess environmental flows, and develop decision support systems. Recommendations included using economic tools to evaluate costs and benefits, creating incentives for cost sharing, and establishing monitoring and evaluation systems to track both environmental and socioeconomic indicators. Challenges with monitoring included establishing meaningful indicators and ensuring sustainability after projects end.
This document discusses metrics for measuring the success and effectiveness of adaptation efforts at different levels, from local to national to global. It notes that while measuring adaptation is important for accountability and learning, there is no universally accepted metric. Frameworks have used indicators of processes, outcomes, and vulnerability/resilience but these may not translate across scales. The document explores how countries are developing their own metrics and indicators in adaptation strategies and calls for balancing policy and practice through narrative explanations to justify measures. It also discusses ensuring coherence between adaptation measurement and SDG indicators for sustainable development. Key challenges raised include quantifying non-economic impacts of adaptation and uncertainty around long-term climate trends and impacts.
This document discusses metrics for measuring the success and effectiveness of adaptation efforts at different levels, from local to national to global. It notes that while measuring adaptation is important for accountability, learning, and targeting funds, there is no universally accepted metric. Frameworks have used indicators of processes, outcomes, and vulnerability, but these may not translate across scales. The document explores how countries are developing their own frameworks and indicators, with local measures needing contextualization. Ensuring coherence across scales and linking to SDGs requires balancing concepts and practices, using both process and results indicators over long time horizons, and strengthening statistical capacities. Key challenges include fully capturing costs and benefits, uncertainties of climate impacts, and developing more outcome-oriented indicators of long-
Monitoring, evaluation, and learning (MEL) systems for National Adaptation Plan (NAP) processes are essential for countries to track, assess and learn from their progress on adaptation. MEL systems can help countries to understand the effectiveness of their NAP processes, support mutual accountability and transparency to stakeholders, and contribute to learning to accelerate adaptation actions.
The document presents a monitoring and evaluation tool developed by the Least Developed Countries Expert Group (LEG) to assess progress, effectiveness, and gaps in the process of formulating and implementing National Adaptation Plans (NAPs). The tool defines 10 essential functions that encapsulate the expected outcomes of the NAP process. It then establishes generic metrics that can be applied to each function to monitor progress over time and identify areas needing improvement. The tool is intended to help countries strengthen adaptation planning and implementation through a flexible, learning-based approach.
The document summarizes discussions from a joint stocktaking mission on Cambodia's National Adaptation Plan (NAP) process by the NAP Global Support Programme and GIZ.
Key points discussed include recommendations to improve the NAP process, such as developing joint activities across sectors and a roadmap. Main objectives of the NAP process according to UNFCCC guidelines are to reduce vulnerability to climate change impacts and integrate adaptation into policies and planning.
A gap analysis found Cambodia's process is not yet launched and lacks consistent climate scenarios, vulnerability assessments, and a long-term implementation strategy. The debriefing meeting proposed strategy areas and a roadmap to establish the NAP process and provide an overarching framework for adaptation
Introduction to the NAP Global Network Webinar Series | Sector Integration in...NAP Global Network
Presentation by Hayley Price-Kelly, IISD, introducing the NAP Global Network webinar series and the topic "Sector Integration in the NAP Process: A Spectrum of Approaches."
You can watch a recording of the webinar here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCTfrhYx13o&feature=youtu.be
This document provides an overview of the National Adaptation Plan (NAP) process, which aims to integrate climate change adaptation into development planning at the national, sectoral, and local levels. Over 90 countries have initiated NAP processes to assess climate risks, identify adaptation priorities, and enhance coordination on adaptation actions. The NAP process is intended to be strategic, coordinated, iterative, country-driven, and participatory to effectively reduce vulnerability to climate impacts over the medium and long term.
Using case-based methods to assess scalability and sustainability: Lessons fr...JSI
Overview of the SC4CCM project and end-line evaluation questions focused on scalability and sustainability. Methodological approaches including case selection strategies, mixed method approaches, within-case and cross-case analysis processes. (Sangeeta Mookherji, GWU)
RPN 2022 Manila: Session 3.3 David Annandale DDA Consulting.pdfOECD Environment
The document discusses strategic environmental assessment (SEA) and its role in infrastructure planning. SEA is a process used to evaluate the environmental impacts of policies, plans, and programs early in decision making. It can identify sustainable alternatives and prevent costly mistakes compared to project-level environmental impact assessments. The benefits of SEA include cheaper and more effective assessments, identifying options to facilitate sustainable development, and improving governance. SEA can be applied to infrastructure planning at various levels and sectors. Government agencies are typically responsible for conducting SEA to inform infrastructure planning. The document provides examples of SEA application in Myanmar and Mongolia.
PEG M&E tool: a tool for monitoring and reviewing Progress, Effectiveness & G...Tariq A. Deen
The session will provide details on: the tool developed by the LEG for monitoring and evaluating progress, effectiveness and gaps (PEG M&E tool) and its application in the process to formulate and implement NAPs; and the best practices for developing monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems for adaptation at the national level. It will also look at the experiences of countries in developing and applying M&E systems at their national levels.
PEG M&E tool: a tool for monitoring and reviewing Progress, Effectiveness & ...NAP Events
Presented by: Thinley Namgyel
8.3 Monitoring and evaluation
The session will provide details on: the tool developed by the LEG for monitoring and evaluating progress, effectiveness and gaps (PEG M&E tool) and its application in the process to formulate and implement NAPs; and the best practices for developing monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems for adaptation at the national level. It will also look at the experiences of countries in developing and applying M&E systems at their national levels.
Monitoring & Evaluation of National Adaptation: Key challenges and emerging s...NAP Global Network
Presented by Julie Dekens, IISD/NAP Global Network, in September 2020 at the Virtual Learning Event on Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) for National Adaptation in Pacific Small Island Developing States organized by organized by the NAP Global Network in collaboration with the Pacific Resilience Partnership (PRP)
NAP Expo - Delivering effective and adequate adaptation.pptxNAP Global Network
The Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), the United Nations Development Program (UNDP), the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) and the NAP Global Network propose to bring best practices from their respective NAP programmes and projects to showcase how the NAP process can drive transformational adaptation at the local, sub-national and national levels.
Self-assessment: Planning to implementation in the NAP process + integrating ...NAP Global Network
Presentation given by Anne Hammill, Vice-President, IISD (NAP Global Network Secretariat), as part of the Network's Peer Learning Forum on “The Transition from Planning to Implementation in the NAP Process,” held in Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe, from February 27-29, 2024
Monitoring and Evaluation of Adaptation: Overview | Angelica V. OspinaNAP Global Network
Presentation by Angelica V. Ospina, IISD, on "Monitoring and Evaluation of Adaptation: Overview" at the National Adaptation Plan (NAP) Global Network's Targeted Topics Forum in Lilongwe, Malawi, in February 2017.
This document provides an overview of Result Based Project Design and Management (RBM). RBM is a project management strategy used by the UN to ensure activities contribute to desired results. It measures actual changes rather than just outputs, and includes all stakeholders. The RBM cycle includes setting a vision based on data, defining a results framework with inputs, activities, outputs and outcomes, and planning monitoring with indicators, targets and verification. The document provides examples of an RBM results framework and steps for applying RBM to project design, including identifying issues, developing the framework, and monitoring planning.
Developing National Adaptation Monitoring and Evaluation SystemsNAP Global Network
Presentation by Timo Leiter, GIZ, for the webinar "Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) in the National Adaptation Plan (NAP) Process."
You can watch a recording of the webinar here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIqbygK6obE
Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) is important for tracking the progress and determining the effectiveness of ecosystem-based adaptation (EbA) projects. There are four key steps to designing and implementing an M&E system for EbA: 1) developing a results framework using a Theory of Change, 2) defining indicators, baselines and targets, 3) operationalizing the M&E system, and 4) using and communicating the results. Undertaking M&E contributes to the adaptive management, learning, and sustainability of EbA actions.
Similar to Andes Resilientes | Vertical integration of MEL in adaptation policy & planning (20)
Presentation by Sapolu Tetoa and Semisi Tonga, Government of Tuvalu, at the Coalition Of Low-Lying Atoll Nations on Climate Change (CANCC) peer learning cohort workshop on “National Adaptation Planning With a Focus on Coastal Adaptation” in North Malé Atoll, Maldives, between May 1 - May 3, 2024.
Scaling up coastal adaptation in Maldives through the NAP processNAP Global Network
Presentation by Ahmed Jameel (AJ) and Ibrahim Faiz, Water Solutions Ltd., at the Coalition Of Low-Lying Atoll Nations on Climate Change (CANCC) peer learning cohort workshop on “National Adaptation Planning With a Focus on Coastal Adaptation” in North Malé Atoll, Maldives, between May 1 - May 3, 2024.
Financing strategies for adaptation. Presentation for CANCCNAP Global Network
Presentation by Maribel Hernandez, NAP Global Network (IISD), at the Coalition Of Low-Lying Atoll Nations on Climate Change (CANCC) peer learning cohort workshop on “National Adaptation Planning With a Focus on Coastal Adaptation” in North Malé Atoll, Maldives, between May 1 - May 3, 2024.
Presentation by the Maldives' Housing Development Corporation at the Coalition Of Low-Lying Atoll Nations on Climate Change (CANCC) peer learning cohort workshop on “National Adaptation Planning With a Focus on Coastal Adaptation” in North Malé Atoll, Maldives, between May 1 - May 3, 2024.
Finance strategies for adaptation. Presentation for CANCCNAP Global Network
Presentation by Alessio Giardino Senior Climate and Coastal Adaptation Specialist, ADB, at the Coalition Of Low-Lying Atoll Nations on Climate Change (CANCC) peer learning cohort workshop on “National Adaptation Planning With a Focus on Coastal Adaptation” in North Malé Atoll, Maldives, between May 1 - May 3, 2024.
An Atoll Futures Research Institute? Presentation for CANCCNAP Global Network
Presentation by Professor Jon Barnett, University of Melbourne, at the Coalition Of Low-Lying Atoll Nations on Climate Change (CANCC) peer learning cohort workshop on “National Adaptation Planning With a Focus on Coastal Adaptation” in North Malé Atoll, Maldives, between May 1 - May 3, 2024.
How inclusive and cross-scale stakeholder engagement can drive transformation...NAP Global Network
The objective of this presentation is to underscore the significance of bolstering inclusive multi-stakeholder engagement for climate change adaptation, especially for the formulation, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation of NAPs, while showcasing successful examples that have integrated this approach.
Training on NAPs: Developing and applying monitoring, evaluation and learning...NAP Global Network
As countries shift from planning to implementing adaptation interventions, having functional MEL tools for NAP processes becomes essential to help accelerate adaptation action and finance, ensure accountability and transparency to stakeholders, and contribute to learning from adaptation actions.
Peace-Conflict-and-National-Adaptation-Plan-NAP-Processes-.pdfNAP Global Network
This presentation focuses on how governments operating in peacebuilding contexts can design and implement their NAP process in a way that responds to peace and conflict dynamics.
Learn more about the adaptation chapter of BTRs and how countries can leverage the outputs and results of their National Adaptation Plan (NAP) processes for their transparency reporting.
Enabling factors for the transition from planning to implementation in the NA...NAP Global Network
Presentation given by Orville Grey, Head of Secretariat, NAP Global Network, as part of the Network's Peer Learning Forum on “The Transition from Planning to Implementation in the NAP Process,” held in Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe, from February 27-29, 2024
Presentation given by Michael Mullan, OECD, as part of the NAP Global Network's Peer Learning Forum on “The Transition from Planning to Implementation in the NAP Process,” held in Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe, from February 27-29, 2024
Presentation given by Ms. Teneisha Smith and Mr. Sherwyn Greenidge, Antigua & Barbuda, as part of the NAP Global Network's Peer Learning Forum on “The Transition from Planning to Implementation in the NAP Process,” held in Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe, from February 27-29, 2024
Adaptation Investment Financing in Africa: AfDB’s ApproachNAP Global Network
Presentation given by Dr Olufunso Somorin, AfDB, as part of the NAP Global Network's Peer Learning Forum on “The Transition from Planning to Implementation in the NAP Process,” held in Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe, from February 27-29, 2024
Developing projects and programs in a strategic manner: Adaptation Investment...NAP Global Network
Presentation given by Deborah Murphy and Maribel Hernandez, NAP Global Network, as part of the Network's Peer Learning Forum on “The Transition from Planning to Implementation in the NAP Process,” held in Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe, from February 27-29, 2024
Understanding the Transition from Planning to Implementation (P2I)NAP Global Network
Presentation given by Orville Grey, Head of Secretariat, NAP Global Network, as part of the Network's Peer Learning Forum on “The Transition from Planning to Implementation in the NAP Process,” held in Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe, from February 27-29, 2024
Day 1 - Introduction to NAP GN & Peer Learning Forums.pptxNAP Global Network
Presentation given by Orville Grey, Head of Secretariat, NAP Global Network, as part of the Network's Peer Learning Forum on “The Transition from Planning to Implementation in the NAP Process,” held in Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe, from February 27-29, 2024
Monitoring Health for the SDGs - Global Health Statistics 2024 - WHOChristina Parmionova
The 2024 World Health Statistics edition reviews more than 50 health-related indicators from the Sustainable Development Goals and WHO’s Thirteenth General Programme of Work. It also highlights the findings from the Global health estimates 2021, notably the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on life expectancy and healthy life expectancy.
Working with data is a challenge for many organizations. Nonprofits in particular may need to collect and analyze sensitive, incomplete, and/or biased historical data about people. In this talk, Dr. Cori Faklaris of UNC Charlotte provides an overview of current AI capabilities and weaknesses to consider when integrating current AI technologies into the data workflow. The talk is organized around three takeaways: (1) For better or sometimes worse, AI provides you with “infinite interns.” (2) Give people permission & guardrails to learn what works with these “interns” and what doesn’t. (3) Create a roadmap for adding in more AI to assist nonprofit work, along with strategies for bias mitigation.
UN WOD 2024 will take us on a journey of discovery through the ocean's vastness, tapping into the wisdom and expertise of global policy-makers, scientists, managers, thought leaders, and artists to awaken new depths of understanding, compassion, collaboration and commitment for the ocean and all it sustains. The program will expand our perspectives and appreciation for our blue planet, build new foundations for our relationship to the ocean, and ignite a wave of action toward necessary change.
AHMR is an interdisciplinary peer-reviewed online journal created to encourage and facilitate the study of all aspects (socio-economic, political, legislative and developmental) of Human Mobility in Africa. Through the publication of original research, policy discussions and evidence research papers AHMR provides a comprehensive forum devoted exclusively to the analysis of contemporaneous trends, migration patterns and some of the most important migration-related issues.
United Nations World Oceans Day 2024; June 8th " Awaken new dephts".Christina Parmionova
The program will expand our perspectives and appreciation for our blue planet, build new foundations for our relationship to the ocean, and ignite a wave of action toward necessary change.
RFP for Reno's Community Assistance CenterThis Is Reno
Property appraisals completed in May for downtown Reno’s Community Assistance and Triage Centers (CAC) reveal that repairing the buildings to bring them back into service would cost an estimated $10.1 million—nearly four times the amount previously reported by city staff.
4. How do these levels “talk” to each other?
Global
National
Local
5. Vertical integration…
…is the process of creating intentional
and strategic linkages between national
and sub-national adaptation planning,
implementation, and monitoring,
evaluation & learning (MEL).
…aims to connect top-down and bottom-
up processes, systems and actions.
…is not a single step!
6. MEL & MRV systems help to communicate
across the multiple levels of policy
Global
National
Local
7. MEL & MRV systems
MEL
MRV
MEL:
• Includes reporting &
communications
• Sometimes include
verification
MRV:
• Focuses on quantitative,
global measures
• One-sided reporting
8. MEL & MRV systems
Monitoring
Evaluation
Learning
Measurement
Reporting &
Comms
Verification
What M+E+L entails:
• Monitoring (qual & quant)
• Assessment of progress: evaluating
outcome and impact results
• Understanding how changes occurred
• Providing mutual accountability and
transparency
Reporting &
Comms
Verification
Reporting &
Comms
Verification
Reporting &
Comms
Verification
9. - Impact & effectiveness: adaptation is
contextual… so what does resilience mean?
Whose resilience has been affected?
- Equity: integrating local voices and actors in the
policies that affect them
- Agency & justice: local, indigenous and traditional
knowledge offers routes to sustainability
What do we want to MEL for adaptation policy ?
10. MEL is a social undertaking: it
can reinforce or confront
societal values and social
dynamics such as power and
legitimacy.
11. Vertical integration in the NAP process
Check out data on NAP Trends:
https://trends.napglobalnetwork.org
12. MEL in the NAP process
Check out data on NAP Trends:
https://trends.napglobalnetwork.org
• M&E tends to rely on external and technical
experts
• Current M&E practices don’t include local
actors - indicators do not reflect local inputs
• People responsible for analysis and
aggregation rarely understand local contexts
• Feedback and dissemination of results
downwards is often forgotten
13. No one-size fits all approach
Adaptation is context-
specific (country, sector,
region, social groups and
ecosystems)
There is no global
adaptation metric to
measure success
Multiple compounding
factors contribute to
adaptation results
Evaluating the success of an
adaptation measure takes a
long time
14. Each country has different
policy systems – and different
degrees of devolution
• Levels of devolution / decentralisation are
linked to the principle of subsidiarity
• Devolution can include different scales of
decision-making, funding and governance
responsibilities
• Devolution is particularly important when
considering the localised nature of
adaptation
• Opportunities for vertical integration of
planning and MEL in all countries
15. Vertical integration
considerations across
different stages
• Planning
• Implementation
• Monitoring
• Evaluation
• Learning
https://napglobalnetwork.org/resource/snapshot-developing-capacity-sub-national-adaptation-action-republic-sudan/
16. • Establish clear objectives – for
the policy, and the MEL system
(theories of change)
• Start simple – pilot then scale up
• Build on existing systems, data
and planning cycles
Planning considerations
17. • Need to priorities actions and activities –
transparently
• Establish a mandate for the MEL system
• Think of complementary capacities between
actors, systems & data
• MEL occurs at all stages of implementation –
when works best?
Implementation considerations
18. • Work with different types of local actors to
access data and knowledge
• Collaborate for other international actors to
get the full (data) picture
• Use tools that are appropriate for each type
of actors
• Disaggregate data for collecting & analysis
• Leverage technologies (e.g.: platforms,
geospatial)
Monitoring considerations
https://letsrespondtoolkit.org/
19. • Keeping knowledge - work with local
and national people
• Devolve analysis whenever possible
• Provide practical guidance for
collection – and for analysis
• Work with civil society and research
actors to build capacities
• Document what worked – and what
did not work – and why
Evaluation considerations
20. • Develop a two-way learning and
communication strategy from onset
• Work with civil society and research actors to
accelerate learning
• Ensure evidence reaches those who make
decisions – across levels
Learning considerations
Photo: Emefa Toklo, Lensational trainee, Ghana 2021.
21. The Paris Agreement established the global goal on
adaptation in 2015 to
• Bring adaptation on a parity with mitigation;
• Increase visibility of adaptation actions and needs.
COP26 established the Glasgow-Sharm el-Sheikh work
programme to take place in 2022-23
Countries must be able to assess and communicate
their adaptation progress and priorities using the best
available evidence/science.
Article 7.1 of the Paris Agreement
states:
“Parties hereby establish the global
goal on adaptation of enhancing
adaptive capacity, strengthening
resilience and reducing vulnerability
to climate change, with a view to
contributing to sustainable
development and ensuring an
adequate adaptation response in
the context of the temperature goal
referred to in Article 2.”
The global goal on adaptation: linking
national priorities to the global ambitions
23. Example of vertically integrated MEL framework: Tracking
Adaptation & Monitoring Development
An evaluative framework for assessing the effectiveness of
adaptation actions in the frame climate risks to sustainable
development
• Adaptation as the ability to live and thrive in the face of
climate risks
• Can be applied at all levels – international to local, and
across sectors
• TAMD can be used as a starting point or template for
developing national adaptation evaluation frameworks
tailored for different country contexts.
• Used at project and national levels in Cambodia, Kenya,
Mali, Senegal, Tanzania, Zanzibar (…)
https://www.iied.org/tracking-adaptation-measuring-development-tamd
24. Example of vertically integrated MEL framework: Tracking
Adaptation & Monitoring Development
• Going beyond indicators to measure
processes, outcome and impact
indicators across scales
• Two tracks: measuring processes &
measuring outcomes for resilience
• TAMD is flexible & non-prescriptive
– framework works at all levels
• Offers methodology for suggested
indicators
• Assessing contribution, not
attribution
25. The Devolved Climate Finance (DCF) mechanism
https://www.iied.org/decentralising-climate-funds-mali-senegal https://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/G04424.pdf
26.
27. Track 2
Development & adaptation performance
Vulnerability/resilience, adaptation, wellbeing indicators
Track 1
Adaptation & CRM processes
Institutional indicators, assessments of practices
2
3
1
4
5
Climate
data
TAMD: linking local outcomes and national systems
28. A look at an institutional scoreard
Supported by methodological notes available for download at http://www.iied.org/tracking-adaptation-measuring-development
29. Example of data visualization and analysis
From Brooks et al. 2013; Anderson & Fisher, 2018..
30. Successes
• Evidence integrated in communal /
local adaptation plans
• Citizen assemblies used for
accountability
• Understanding of which
investment worked best for whom
• Community of practice between
countries remains
Limits
• Implemented with project
assistance – what happened after?
• New commissioners
• Lack of budgets
• Too complicated
• Did not reach integration in high
level decisions
• Lack of transferable learning
globally
31. • Important to adapt indicators – both for processes and outcomes - to be
meaningful and inspire progress
• Social change takes time to unfold… Many challenges, but changes do occur.
Think of how to assess pathways for impacts!
• Tensions between project and long-term approach need to be thought from
onset, including linkages between local and national.
• Using methods accessible for local governments (e.g. scorecards) can lessen
adaptation costs by informing government decisions in climate planning and
climate risk
Lessons for the vertical integration of MEL in
adaptation policy & planning
33. Group discussion
From your experience, discuss over
the next 30 minutes:
Linking levels
• What planning (and M&E) mechanisms already exist to
facilitate linkages between national and sub-national
planning processes? How can these be leveraged for the
M&E processes?
Local integration methods
• What approaches are currently used at the lowest levels
of government for M&E of adaptation?
• How are the voices of local communities integrated in
M&E and planning exercises?
National integration
• Who and how is data being synthesized, analysed and
aggregated at the national level?
• Who and how it is being shared back?
=> What is the most crucial linkage to be done, which is
currently missing in your context?
34. Closing thoughts…
MEL is critical for
vertical integration – it
represents the
systems through
which evidence gets
communicated
•Photo caption
Involving local
actors and contexts
in vertically
integrated MEL is
essential for
successful
adaptation
MEL involves a
series of systems –
methods, tools,
people – that defines
roles,
responsibilities and
relationships
I had thought of
something else