The document discusses market structure and perfect competition. It defines key concepts like market, firm, industry, revenue and costs. It describes the characteristics of a perfectly competitive market, including numerous small firms, homogeneous products, free entry and exit, and perfect information. Firms in perfect competition are price takers and will produce where price equals marginal cost to maximize profits in the short run. The market equilibrium price and quantity are determined by the intersection of total industry supply and demand.
A market can be defined as a group of firms willing and able to sell a similar product or service to the same potential buyers.
Imperfect competition covers all situations where there is neither pure competition nor pure monopoly.
Perfect competition and pure monopoly are very unlikely to be found in the real world.
In the real world, it is the imperfect competition lying between perfect competition and pure monopoly.
The fundamental distinguishing characteristic of imperfect competition is that average revenue curve slopes downwards throughout its length, but it slopes downwards at different rates in different categories of imperfect competition.
Monopoly refers to the market situation where there is a
Single seller selling a product which has no close substitutes.
Monopolies are characterized by a lack of economic competition to produce the good or service, a lack of viable substitute goods, and the existence of a high monopoly price well above the firm's marginal cost that leads to a high monopoly profit
The word “oligopoly” comes from the Greek “oligos” meaning "little or small” and “polein” meaning “to sell.” When “oligos” is used in the plural, it means “few” ,few firms or few sellers.
DEFINATION:
Oligopoly is that form of market where there are few firms and there is natural interdependence among the firms regarding price and output policy.
This document introduces market structure models and their characteristics. It discusses the four main market structures: perfect competition, monopolistic competition, oligopoly and monopoly. It outlines their key characteristics such as the number and size of firms, nature of products, barriers to entry and examples. It then examines how firm behavior is affected differently under each market structure in terms of pricing, costs, branding and profitability. The document emphasizes that more competitive market structures are generally more efficient for allocating resources.
The document summarizes different market structures: perfect competition, monopolistic competition, oligopoly, and monopoly. It provides details on the characteristics of each structure, citing academic sources. Perfect competition requires homogeneous products, price-taking firms with perfect knowledge, and perfectly mobile resources. Monopolistic competition involves differentiated products where each firm is a price-taker facing a downward sloping demand curve. Oligopoly features interdependent firms in a market with few players. Monopoly is defined as a single seller producing the entire market supply.
The document discusses different market structures including perfect competition, monopoly, monopolistic competition, and oligopoly. It provides definitions and key assumptions of each market structure. For perfect competition, it describes characteristics like numerous buyers and sellers, homogeneous products, free entry and exit. It also discusses equilibrium price and output determination under perfect competition. For monopoly, it discusses sources of market imperfections and how revenues are determined. It provides a comparison of monopoly and perfect competition.
This document defines different types of markets and their characteristics. It discusses perfect competition, monopoly, oligopoly, and monopolistic competition. Perfect competition is defined by many small firms, undifferentiated products, free entry and exit into the market, and firms being price takers. A monopoly has a single firm, significant barriers to entry, and the firm is a price maker. Oligopoly is characterized by a few dominant firms where the actions of one impact the others. Monopolistic competition involves many small differentiated firms that face downward sloping demand curves. The document also briefly discusses how globalization integrates markets around the world.
10. market structure and pricing practices 130119101444-phpapp01malikjameel1986
The document discusses different market structures including perfect competition, monopoly, monopolistic competition, oligopoly, and cartels. It provides details on key features, pricing behaviors, and equilibrium conditions for each market structure. Perfect competition is defined by many buyers and sellers, homogenous products, and price being determined by supply and demand. A monopoly grants a single seller complete market control to set price. Monopolistic competition features product differentiation while allowing long run equilibrium with no profits. Oligopoly relies on interdependent actions among a small number of large firms. Cartels explicitly fix prices through collusive agreements.
This document discusses different types of market structures: pure competition, monopoly, monopolistic competition, and oligopoly. It provides key characteristics of each structure, including the number and size of buyers and sellers, product differentiation, barriers to entry/exit, and pricing behavior. Pure competition has many small firms and sellers producing homogeneous products. A monopoly has a single seller of unique products with no close substitutes. Monopolistic competition features many firms making differentiated products. Oligopoly involves a small number of large firms producing standardized or differentiated goods.
The document discusses market structure and perfect competition. It defines key concepts like market, firm, industry, revenue and costs. It describes the characteristics of a perfectly competitive market, including numerous small firms, homogeneous products, free entry and exit, and perfect information. Firms in perfect competition are price takers and will produce where price equals marginal cost to maximize profits in the short run. The market equilibrium price and quantity are determined by the intersection of total industry supply and demand.
A market can be defined as a group of firms willing and able to sell a similar product or service to the same potential buyers.
Imperfect competition covers all situations where there is neither pure competition nor pure monopoly.
Perfect competition and pure monopoly are very unlikely to be found in the real world.
In the real world, it is the imperfect competition lying between perfect competition and pure monopoly.
The fundamental distinguishing characteristic of imperfect competition is that average revenue curve slopes downwards throughout its length, but it slopes downwards at different rates in different categories of imperfect competition.
Monopoly refers to the market situation where there is a
Single seller selling a product which has no close substitutes.
Monopolies are characterized by a lack of economic competition to produce the good or service, a lack of viable substitute goods, and the existence of a high monopoly price well above the firm's marginal cost that leads to a high monopoly profit
The word “oligopoly” comes from the Greek “oligos” meaning "little or small” and “polein” meaning “to sell.” When “oligos” is used in the plural, it means “few” ,few firms or few sellers.
DEFINATION:
Oligopoly is that form of market where there are few firms and there is natural interdependence among the firms regarding price and output policy.
This document introduces market structure models and their characteristics. It discusses the four main market structures: perfect competition, monopolistic competition, oligopoly and monopoly. It outlines their key characteristics such as the number and size of firms, nature of products, barriers to entry and examples. It then examines how firm behavior is affected differently under each market structure in terms of pricing, costs, branding and profitability. The document emphasizes that more competitive market structures are generally more efficient for allocating resources.
The document summarizes different market structures: perfect competition, monopolistic competition, oligopoly, and monopoly. It provides details on the characteristics of each structure, citing academic sources. Perfect competition requires homogeneous products, price-taking firms with perfect knowledge, and perfectly mobile resources. Monopolistic competition involves differentiated products where each firm is a price-taker facing a downward sloping demand curve. Oligopoly features interdependent firms in a market with few players. Monopoly is defined as a single seller producing the entire market supply.
The document discusses different market structures including perfect competition, monopoly, monopolistic competition, and oligopoly. It provides definitions and key assumptions of each market structure. For perfect competition, it describes characteristics like numerous buyers and sellers, homogeneous products, free entry and exit. It also discusses equilibrium price and output determination under perfect competition. For monopoly, it discusses sources of market imperfections and how revenues are determined. It provides a comparison of monopoly and perfect competition.
This document defines different types of markets and their characteristics. It discusses perfect competition, monopoly, oligopoly, and monopolistic competition. Perfect competition is defined by many small firms, undifferentiated products, free entry and exit into the market, and firms being price takers. A monopoly has a single firm, significant barriers to entry, and the firm is a price maker. Oligopoly is characterized by a few dominant firms where the actions of one impact the others. Monopolistic competition involves many small differentiated firms that face downward sloping demand curves. The document also briefly discusses how globalization integrates markets around the world.
10. market structure and pricing practices 130119101444-phpapp01malikjameel1986
The document discusses different market structures including perfect competition, monopoly, monopolistic competition, oligopoly, and cartels. It provides details on key features, pricing behaviors, and equilibrium conditions for each market structure. Perfect competition is defined by many buyers and sellers, homogenous products, and price being determined by supply and demand. A monopoly grants a single seller complete market control to set price. Monopolistic competition features product differentiation while allowing long run equilibrium with no profits. Oligopoly relies on interdependent actions among a small number of large firms. Cartels explicitly fix prices through collusive agreements.
This document discusses different types of market structures: pure competition, monopoly, monopolistic competition, and oligopoly. It provides key characteristics of each structure, including the number and size of buyers and sellers, product differentiation, barriers to entry/exit, and pricing behavior. Pure competition has many small firms and sellers producing homogeneous products. A monopoly has a single seller of unique products with no close substitutes. Monopolistic competition features many firms making differentiated products. Oligopoly involves a small number of large firms producing standardized or differentiated goods.
This document summarizes a model of monopolistic competition in international trade of agricultural products. The model assumes firms are symmetric and considers how market size impacts firm behavior. It describes equilibrium as the intersection of average cost and price curves, where the number of firms and price maximize profits. The analysis shows market expansion or subsidy increases can raise the equilibrium number of firms in a sector by lowering costs for farmers.
Business Economics 09 Market Structures & Pricing StrategyUttam Satapathy
The document discusses different market structures and pricing strategies. It covers four main market structures - perfect competition, monopoly, monopolistic competition and oligopoly. It describes their characteristics including number of firms, product differentiation, and degree of control over prices. Pricing strategies discussed for firms with market power include price discrimination, peak load pricing, cross subsidies and limit pricing. Real world examples of cartels like OPEC and pricing strategies used by airlines and electricity boards are provided.
This document discusses market structure, conduct, and performance. It defines market structure as the organizational characteristics of a market, focusing on factors that affect competition between firms like the number of buyers and sellers and barriers to entry. Market conduct refers to how firms behave in a market in terms of pricing, output, and other decisions. Market performance evaluates efficiency and other outcomes. The relationship between these three factors is complex as each can influence the others over time.
http://www.myassignmenthelp.net/economics-assignment-help.php
University economics deals with subjects like economic theory, microeconomics, demand-supply gap, macroeconomics. These subjects are part of various evaluations like economics thesis, economics dissertation and economics essay. MyAssignmentHelp.net provides all such economics help and economics assignment help
This document provides an overview of different market structures: pure competition, pure monopoly, monopolistic competition, and oligopoly. It defines each structure and discusses their key characteristics. Pure competition is characterized by many small sellers, homogeneous products, perfect information and mobility. A pure monopoly has a single seller, large barriers to entry, and wields substantial influence over prices. Monopolistic competition involves many sellers of differentiated products. Oligopoly is dominated by a small number of interdependent firms. The document also outlines the assumptions of each market structure model and provides examples.
This document discusses different types of market structures:
1) Perfect competition has many small firms and buyers, homogeneous products, no barriers to entry or exit, and perfect information. Firms are price takers.
2) Monopolistic competition and oligopoly have differentiated products and many firms/buyers. Firms have some control over prices.
3) Monopoly has a single seller, barriers to entry, and the ability to set prices. The monopolist is the sole supplier.
This short revision video provides an overview of three forms of imperfect competition, namely monopoly, oligopoly and imperfect competition. It considers too the likely impact of each market structure on allocative, productive and dynamic efficiency.
The document defines the four main types of market structures: perfect competition, monopoly, monopolistic competition, and oligopoly. Perfect competition is characterized by many small firms and buyers producing identical goods. A monopoly features a single seller of unique goods without close substitutes. Monopolistic competition involves many firms selling differentiated goods. Oligopoly describes an industry with a small number of large firms that interact strategically. Examples are provided for each type as well as their key characteristics regarding competition, pricing, and profitability.
This document discusses oligopoly and monopolistic competition. It defines oligopoly as a market with a few sellers selling homogeneous or differentiated products. Key characteristics of oligopoly include few sellers, interdependence between sellers, and uncertainty. The document also describes types of oligopoly markets like price wars and collusion. It discusses the kinked demand curve model of price rigidity in oligopoly. The document then defines monopolistic competition as a market with many producers of differentiated products having some monopoly power and free entry/exit. It notes characteristics like product differentiation and selling costs. [/SUMMARY]
This document discusses market structure and competition. It defines key concepts such as industry, market structure, conduct, and performance. It describes the characteristics and behaviors of different market structures including perfect competition, monopoly, monopolistic competition, and oligopoly. Perfect competition leads to static efficiency but not dynamic efficiency. Monopoly is not statically efficient but can promote dynamic efficiency. Oligopolies may engage in non-collusive or collusive conduct, as modeled by game theory examples like the prisoner's dilemma.
This document contains classroom materials on market structures for economics instruction including:
- A description of a market poster assignment asking students to explain examples of perfect competition, monopolistic competition, oligopoly, and monopoly markets.
- Examples of verbal bellringers asking students about pricing power in monopoly markets and the definition of consumer surplus.
- Charts reviewing key aspects of perfect competition, monopolistic competition, oligopoly, and monopoly markets.
The document discusses market structures and their characteristics. It describes four basic market models: perfect competition, monopoly, monopolistic competition, and oligopoly. For each model, it provides details on the number of firms, product differentiation, and pricing determinants. It also mentions that market imperfections, costs, quality, and consumer satisfaction influence market structures. Government participation is needed to allocate resources fairly and protect the interests of the poor.
This document defines different market structures and models based on factors like the number of sellers, product differentiation, barriers to entry and exit, and control over price. It describes the characteristics and dynamics of pure competition, monopolistic competition, oligopoly, and monopoly market structures. A key takeaway is that market structures exist on a continuum from perfect competition to imperfect competition, with pure monopoly having the fewest sellers, highest barriers to entry, and most control over price.
This document discusses key concepts relating to market structure, conduct, and performance. It outlines six key features that determine market structure, including the number of firms, market share of largest firms, nature of costs, degree of vertical integration, product differentiation, and structure of buyers. It also discusses how market structure influences the conduct and pricing decisions of businesses. Finally, it analyzes how market performance can impact structure over time through factors like market share changes, research and development spending, and productivity trends.
The document is a quiz about market structures that contains multiple choice questions. It asks the reader to identify the type of market structure that has less market power and price takers. It also asks about barriers to entry in oligopoly markets and provides examples like the telecommunications industry starting as a monopoly.
This document discusses monopolistic competition, which assumes many producers and consumers, slight product differentiation, producers that have some control over price as "price makers," and low barriers to entry and exit. Examples of industries with monopolistic competition include shoe repairs, taxis, coffee shops, hair salons, dry cleaners, and bars. Under monopolistic competition in the short run, firms have downward sloping demand curves and will produce at the quantity where marginal revenue equals marginal cost to maximize profits, earning supernormal profits when price is above average cost.
Perfect competition requires multiple participants, identical products, free information sharing, and easy market entry and exit. It is rare in practice as most markets have some level of government intervention or specialization, violating one of the key characteristics. The characteristics include many producers and consumers, commoditized goods where quality and features are identical, all participants having access to the same information on prices and availability, and easy ability for producers to start or leave production.
This document discusses market structures and concepts related to profit maximization. It begins by outlining the goals of firms, including profit maximization, growth, sales/revenue maximization, and market dominance. It then defines revenue, profit, normal profits, abnormal profits, and losses.
The document proceeds to describe four major market structures - perfect competition, monopoly, monopolistic competition, and oligopoly. It provides assumptions, characteristics, profit maximization conditions, and graphs for each market structure. Finally, it discusses natural monopoly, price discrimination, and concludes with a description of monopolistic competition.
The document provides information on the general merchandising industry in the United States, including its size, growth rate, and profitability. It discusses the industry's total sales, which grew to over $444 billion by 2000, and median return on equity of 10.5% between 1999-2002. The document also provides North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes and definitions for different segments within the general merchandising industry.
Market Research Report : Lighting industry in india 2015 - SampleNetscribes, Inc.
For the complete report, get in touch with us at: info@netscribes.com
Abstract :
Netscribes’ latest market research report titled Lighting Industry in India 2015 analyses the Indian lighting market into four broad dimensions, based on applications, technologies, geographies and end-market structures. It tracks the domestic production of different lighting equipment, such as lamps, LEDs and luminaires. Incandescent lamps dominate the non-LED lighting market, followed by CFL lamps and other fluorescent lamps. However, the market for incandescent lamps is shrinking, as people migrate to more energy-efficient and cost-effective sources of light. This is strongly reflected in the urban lighting usage pattern, where the share of incandescent lamps has shrunk to just one-fourth. In terms of growth, the Indian LED lighting market has outpaced non-LED lighting market by over four times and holds the most potential. Today, the Indian lighting market has evolved and offers specialized products such as mood-enhancing lights, LED candles and decorative lights.
Since the opening of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in retail, the lighting market in India has seen the entry of several international players. On the other hand, domestic players have expanded their presence throughout the country. The growth in Indian lighting market has been fuelled by the increase in disposable income, growing consumption in rural segment, rise in organized retail, boom in real estate sector, changing lifestyle of consumers, increasing availability of credit, improvement in rural electrification and the growing population. However, players are also facing challenges such as competition from unorganized segment, depreciation of Rupee and rise in energy costs, lack of consumer awareness about energy-efficient lighting and high import dependency.
Table of Contents :
Slide 1: Executive Summary
Macroeconomic Indicators
Slide 2: GDP at Factor Cost: Quarterly (2011-12 – 2014-15), Inflation Rate: Monthly (Jul 2013 – Dec 2013)
Slide 3: Gross Fiscal Deficit: Monthly (Feb 2013 – Jul 2013), Exchange Rate: Half Yearly (Apr 2014 – Sep 2014)
Slide 4: Lending Rate: Annual (2011-12 – 2014-15), Trade Balance: Annual (2010-11 – 2013-14), FDI: Annual (2009-10 – 2012-13)
Introduction
Slide 5: Classification of the global lighting market
Market Overview
Slide 6: Indian Lighting Market – Overview, Market Size and Growth (Value-Wise; 2013-2018e), Domestic Production (Percentage-Wise; 2010-2013), Segmentation of non-LED Lights (2013)
Slide 7: Lighting Market – Types of Lights, Non-LED Lights –Market Size and Growth (Value-Wise; 2013-2018e), LED Lights –Market Size and Growth (Value-Wise; 2013-2018e)
Slide 8: Rural and Urban Usage Pattern of Lighting Products
Slide 9: LED Lighting – Value Chain
EXIM Data
Slide 10: Export of Lighting Products – Overview, Total Exports (Value-Wise; 2012 – Apr-Aug 2014), Country-Wise Exports Segmentation (Apr-Aug 2014)
This document summarizes a model of monopolistic competition in international trade of agricultural products. The model assumes firms are symmetric and considers how market size impacts firm behavior. It describes equilibrium as the intersection of average cost and price curves, where the number of firms and price maximize profits. The analysis shows market expansion or subsidy increases can raise the equilibrium number of firms in a sector by lowering costs for farmers.
Business Economics 09 Market Structures & Pricing StrategyUttam Satapathy
The document discusses different market structures and pricing strategies. It covers four main market structures - perfect competition, monopoly, monopolistic competition and oligopoly. It describes their characteristics including number of firms, product differentiation, and degree of control over prices. Pricing strategies discussed for firms with market power include price discrimination, peak load pricing, cross subsidies and limit pricing. Real world examples of cartels like OPEC and pricing strategies used by airlines and electricity boards are provided.
This document discusses market structure, conduct, and performance. It defines market structure as the organizational characteristics of a market, focusing on factors that affect competition between firms like the number of buyers and sellers and barriers to entry. Market conduct refers to how firms behave in a market in terms of pricing, output, and other decisions. Market performance evaluates efficiency and other outcomes. The relationship between these three factors is complex as each can influence the others over time.
http://www.myassignmenthelp.net/economics-assignment-help.php
University economics deals with subjects like economic theory, microeconomics, demand-supply gap, macroeconomics. These subjects are part of various evaluations like economics thesis, economics dissertation and economics essay. MyAssignmentHelp.net provides all such economics help and economics assignment help
This document provides an overview of different market structures: pure competition, pure monopoly, monopolistic competition, and oligopoly. It defines each structure and discusses their key characteristics. Pure competition is characterized by many small sellers, homogeneous products, perfect information and mobility. A pure monopoly has a single seller, large barriers to entry, and wields substantial influence over prices. Monopolistic competition involves many sellers of differentiated products. Oligopoly is dominated by a small number of interdependent firms. The document also outlines the assumptions of each market structure model and provides examples.
This document discusses different types of market structures:
1) Perfect competition has many small firms and buyers, homogeneous products, no barriers to entry or exit, and perfect information. Firms are price takers.
2) Monopolistic competition and oligopoly have differentiated products and many firms/buyers. Firms have some control over prices.
3) Monopoly has a single seller, barriers to entry, and the ability to set prices. The monopolist is the sole supplier.
This short revision video provides an overview of three forms of imperfect competition, namely monopoly, oligopoly and imperfect competition. It considers too the likely impact of each market structure on allocative, productive and dynamic efficiency.
The document defines the four main types of market structures: perfect competition, monopoly, monopolistic competition, and oligopoly. Perfect competition is characterized by many small firms and buyers producing identical goods. A monopoly features a single seller of unique goods without close substitutes. Monopolistic competition involves many firms selling differentiated goods. Oligopoly describes an industry with a small number of large firms that interact strategically. Examples are provided for each type as well as their key characteristics regarding competition, pricing, and profitability.
This document discusses oligopoly and monopolistic competition. It defines oligopoly as a market with a few sellers selling homogeneous or differentiated products. Key characteristics of oligopoly include few sellers, interdependence between sellers, and uncertainty. The document also describes types of oligopoly markets like price wars and collusion. It discusses the kinked demand curve model of price rigidity in oligopoly. The document then defines monopolistic competition as a market with many producers of differentiated products having some monopoly power and free entry/exit. It notes characteristics like product differentiation and selling costs. [/SUMMARY]
This document discusses market structure and competition. It defines key concepts such as industry, market structure, conduct, and performance. It describes the characteristics and behaviors of different market structures including perfect competition, monopoly, monopolistic competition, and oligopoly. Perfect competition leads to static efficiency but not dynamic efficiency. Monopoly is not statically efficient but can promote dynamic efficiency. Oligopolies may engage in non-collusive or collusive conduct, as modeled by game theory examples like the prisoner's dilemma.
This document contains classroom materials on market structures for economics instruction including:
- A description of a market poster assignment asking students to explain examples of perfect competition, monopolistic competition, oligopoly, and monopoly markets.
- Examples of verbal bellringers asking students about pricing power in monopoly markets and the definition of consumer surplus.
- Charts reviewing key aspects of perfect competition, monopolistic competition, oligopoly, and monopoly markets.
The document discusses market structures and their characteristics. It describes four basic market models: perfect competition, monopoly, monopolistic competition, and oligopoly. For each model, it provides details on the number of firms, product differentiation, and pricing determinants. It also mentions that market imperfections, costs, quality, and consumer satisfaction influence market structures. Government participation is needed to allocate resources fairly and protect the interests of the poor.
This document defines different market structures and models based on factors like the number of sellers, product differentiation, barriers to entry and exit, and control over price. It describes the characteristics and dynamics of pure competition, monopolistic competition, oligopoly, and monopoly market structures. A key takeaway is that market structures exist on a continuum from perfect competition to imperfect competition, with pure monopoly having the fewest sellers, highest barriers to entry, and most control over price.
This document discusses key concepts relating to market structure, conduct, and performance. It outlines six key features that determine market structure, including the number of firms, market share of largest firms, nature of costs, degree of vertical integration, product differentiation, and structure of buyers. It also discusses how market structure influences the conduct and pricing decisions of businesses. Finally, it analyzes how market performance can impact structure over time through factors like market share changes, research and development spending, and productivity trends.
The document is a quiz about market structures that contains multiple choice questions. It asks the reader to identify the type of market structure that has less market power and price takers. It also asks about barriers to entry in oligopoly markets and provides examples like the telecommunications industry starting as a monopoly.
This document discusses monopolistic competition, which assumes many producers and consumers, slight product differentiation, producers that have some control over price as "price makers," and low barriers to entry and exit. Examples of industries with monopolistic competition include shoe repairs, taxis, coffee shops, hair salons, dry cleaners, and bars. Under monopolistic competition in the short run, firms have downward sloping demand curves and will produce at the quantity where marginal revenue equals marginal cost to maximize profits, earning supernormal profits when price is above average cost.
Perfect competition requires multiple participants, identical products, free information sharing, and easy market entry and exit. It is rare in practice as most markets have some level of government intervention or specialization, violating one of the key characteristics. The characteristics include many producers and consumers, commoditized goods where quality and features are identical, all participants having access to the same information on prices and availability, and easy ability for producers to start or leave production.
This document discusses market structures and concepts related to profit maximization. It begins by outlining the goals of firms, including profit maximization, growth, sales/revenue maximization, and market dominance. It then defines revenue, profit, normal profits, abnormal profits, and losses.
The document proceeds to describe four major market structures - perfect competition, monopoly, monopolistic competition, and oligopoly. It provides assumptions, characteristics, profit maximization conditions, and graphs for each market structure. Finally, it discusses natural monopoly, price discrimination, and concludes with a description of monopolistic competition.
The document provides information on the general merchandising industry in the United States, including its size, growth rate, and profitability. It discusses the industry's total sales, which grew to over $444 billion by 2000, and median return on equity of 10.5% between 1999-2002. The document also provides North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes and definitions for different segments within the general merchandising industry.
Market Research Report : Lighting industry in india 2015 - SampleNetscribes, Inc.
For the complete report, get in touch with us at: info@netscribes.com
Abstract :
Netscribes’ latest market research report titled Lighting Industry in India 2015 analyses the Indian lighting market into four broad dimensions, based on applications, technologies, geographies and end-market structures. It tracks the domestic production of different lighting equipment, such as lamps, LEDs and luminaires. Incandescent lamps dominate the non-LED lighting market, followed by CFL lamps and other fluorescent lamps. However, the market for incandescent lamps is shrinking, as people migrate to more energy-efficient and cost-effective sources of light. This is strongly reflected in the urban lighting usage pattern, where the share of incandescent lamps has shrunk to just one-fourth. In terms of growth, the Indian LED lighting market has outpaced non-LED lighting market by over four times and holds the most potential. Today, the Indian lighting market has evolved and offers specialized products such as mood-enhancing lights, LED candles and decorative lights.
Since the opening of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in retail, the lighting market in India has seen the entry of several international players. On the other hand, domestic players have expanded their presence throughout the country. The growth in Indian lighting market has been fuelled by the increase in disposable income, growing consumption in rural segment, rise in organized retail, boom in real estate sector, changing lifestyle of consumers, increasing availability of credit, improvement in rural electrification and the growing population. However, players are also facing challenges such as competition from unorganized segment, depreciation of Rupee and rise in energy costs, lack of consumer awareness about energy-efficient lighting and high import dependency.
Table of Contents :
Slide 1: Executive Summary
Macroeconomic Indicators
Slide 2: GDP at Factor Cost: Quarterly (2011-12 – 2014-15), Inflation Rate: Monthly (Jul 2013 – Dec 2013)
Slide 3: Gross Fiscal Deficit: Monthly (Feb 2013 – Jul 2013), Exchange Rate: Half Yearly (Apr 2014 – Sep 2014)
Slide 4: Lending Rate: Annual (2011-12 – 2014-15), Trade Balance: Annual (2010-11 – 2013-14), FDI: Annual (2009-10 – 2012-13)
Introduction
Slide 5: Classification of the global lighting market
Market Overview
Slide 6: Indian Lighting Market – Overview, Market Size and Growth (Value-Wise; 2013-2018e), Domestic Production (Percentage-Wise; 2010-2013), Segmentation of non-LED Lights (2013)
Slide 7: Lighting Market – Types of Lights, Non-LED Lights –Market Size and Growth (Value-Wise; 2013-2018e), LED Lights –Market Size and Growth (Value-Wise; 2013-2018e)
Slide 8: Rural and Urban Usage Pattern of Lighting Products
Slide 9: LED Lighting – Value Chain
EXIM Data
Slide 10: Export of Lighting Products – Overview, Total Exports (Value-Wise; 2012 – Apr-Aug 2014), Country-Wise Exports Segmentation (Apr-Aug 2014)
Competition and market strategies in the swiss fixed telephony marketRoberto Balmer
Fixed telephony has long been a fundamentally important market for European telecommunications operators. The liberalisation and the introduction of regulation in the end of the 1990s, however, allowed new entrants to compete with incumbents at the retail level. A rapid price decline and a decline in revenues followed. Increased retail competition eventually led a number of national regulators to deregulate this market. In 2013, however, many European countries (including Switzerland) continued to have partially binding retail price regulation in this market. More than a decade after liberalisation and the introduction of wholesale and retail price regulation, sufficient data is available to empirically measure the success of regulation and assess its continued necessity. This paper develops a market model based on a generalised version of the traditional dominant firm – competitive fringe model allowing for the incumbent a more competitive conduct than that of a dominant firm. A system of simultaneous equations is developed and direct estimation of the incumbent’s residual demand function is performed by instrumenting the market price by incumbent-specific cost shifting variables as well as other variables. Unlike earlier papers that assess market power in this market, this paper also adjusts the market model to ensure a sufficient level of cointegration and avoid spurious regression results. This necessitates the introduction of intertemporal effects. While the incumbent’s conduct cannot be directly estimated using this framework, the concrete estimates show that its residual demand is inelastic (long run price elasticity of residual demand of -0.12). Such a level of elasticity is shown to be only compatible with a profit maximising incumbent in the case of largely competitive conduct (conduct parameter below 0.12 and therefore close to zero). It is consequently found that the Swiss incumbent acted rather competitively in the fixed telephony retail market in the period under review (2004-2012) and that the (partial) retail price caps in place can no longer be justified on the basis of a lack of competition.
The global lighting market is undergoing changes driven by urban growth and energy efficiency. It is estimated to be worth €110 billion by 2020, growing at 6% annually from 2010-2016 and 3% from 2016-2020. General lighting makes up the largest segment at around 75% currently and is expected to reach 80% by 2020. LED lighting is driving market growth as construction increases in emerging markets and higher priced LED technology becomes more widely used. The lighting market is comparable in size to the global TV and computer markets but has received less attention until now.
The document provides an overview of the lighting market in India, including key details about market size and share, major players, types of lighting, and brand positioning strategies. It discusses the consumer and B2B lighting segments, identifies top companies like Philips, Crompton Greaves and Havells, and outlines their approaches to branding, pricing, promotion and SWOT analysis. Recommendations are made around new product categories and expanding CSR initiatives in the lighting industry.
Indian led lighting market forecast to 2019IBNARESEARCH
This document provides an overview and market forecast of the Indian LED lighting market from 2014-2019. It covers topics such as the policy and regulatory environment, manufacturing and production in India, imports and exports, pricing trends, consumer behavior, the current market size and segmentation, and forecasts for future growth. The market is growing rapidly due to government support and promotion of LED lighting to improve energy efficiency. Street lights and downlights currently have the largest volume shares but the market for retrofit lamps and luminaires is growing faster. The document provides numerous tables and figures analyzing trends in each market segment.
Project Report on Comparative Study Philips LED With Other Competitive BrandsKapil Shelke
MBA Summer Internship Project Report, project title is Comparative Study Philips LED With Other Competitive Brands. the research was conducted in PE Electronics Ltd. Aurangabad.
The selling environment in which a firm produces and sells its product is called a market structure.*
Defined by three characteristics:
The number of firms in the market
The ease of entry and exit of firms
The degree of product differentiation
The document discusses the development of the resource-based view of the firm and provides a critical appraisal of the theory, outlining both its methodological difficulties and practical insights. It examines the empirical evidence supporting the resource-based view and addresses areas that require further focus, such as resource functionality and combining the theory with other strategic perspectives.
The document discusses structured problem solving using the 7 step methodology. It covers defining the problem, structuring it, prioritizing issues, planning analyses and work, conducting analyses, synthesizing findings, and developing recommendations. Specific tools and approaches discussed include problem statement worksheets, logic trees, prioritization matrices, and designing analysis sheets and workplans. The overall process is presented as an iterative one to break problems into manageable parts and ensure a logical, complete analysis.
The document discusses various concepts related to export marketing promotion and communication. It covers topics such as the importance of communication in export marketing, different communication techniques like personal selling, sales promotion, publicity, and advertising. It also discusses factors that affect promotion strategies for export marketing and the need to consider standardization versus adaptation of promotion strategies for different international markets.
This document provides information about a marketing research project conducted by Manish Ranjan Singh for his MBA degree, focusing on the neuromuscular blocker cisatracurium. It includes certificates of completion, originality, and from the company where the research was conducted. The research was conducted at Abbott India Ltd. to understand customer preferences for neuromuscular blockers and develop a medical positioning for the product cisatracurium in the Indian market.
This document provides an overview of strategic management and the resource-based view (RBV) of the firm. It discusses the key differences between the industrial organization model and RBV, defining resources and capabilities in RBV. VRIO framework is explained for assessing if resources can provide sustained competitive advantage. Criticisms of RBV are outlined along with suggestions for future research, such as further defining resources and developing a more subjective view of resource value in RBV theory.
This is a great toolbox of slides for putting together a strategic planning or business planning presentation - either in businesses or as a consultant. It took ages to collect this all and put in one place.
The document provides an overview of several frameworks and models used for strategic analysis, including SWOT analysis, Porter's 5 forces, and the strategy diamond. It discusses the strengths and weaknesses of each framework. In particular, it explains that while SWOT analysis identifies strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, it does not provide guidance on what actions to take. The document also discusses different measures of industry concentration, including concentration ratios and the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI). The HHI gives more weight to larger firms and provides a more accurate picture of competition than concentration ratios alone. Thresholds for the HHI indicate whether an industry is highly competitive or concentrated.
Chapter 13A monopolistically competitive market is characterized.docxketurahhazelhurst
Chapter 13
A monopolistically competitive market is characterized by:
· many buyers and sellers,
· differentiated products, and
· easy entry and exit.
The monopolistically competitive market is similar to perfect competition in that there are many buyers and sellers who can enter or leave the market easily in response to economic profits or losses. A monopolistically competitive firm, though, is similar to a monopoly in that it produces a product that is different from that produced by all other firms in the market. The restaurant market in New York City provides a good example of a monopolistically competitive market. Each restaurant has its own recipes, decor, ambiance, etc. but also must compete with many other similar restaurants.
Because each firm produces a differentiated product, it won't lose all of its customers if it raises its prices. Thus, a monopolistically competitive firm faces a downward sloping demand curve for its product. As noted in Chapters 8 and 10, whenever a firm faces a downward sloping demand curve, its marginal revenue curve lies below its demand curve. The diagram below illustrates the relationship that exists between a monopolistically competitive firm's demand and marginal revenue curves.
While the diagram above seems similar to the demand and marginal revenue curves facing a monopolist, there is a critical difference. In a monopolistically competitive market, the number of firms changes as firms enter or leave the industry. When new firms enter the market, the customers are spread over a larger number of firms and the demand for each firm's product declines. An increase in the number of firms also tends to result in an increase in the elasticity of demand for each firm's products (since demand is more elastic when more substitutes are available). The diagram below illustrates the shift in a typical firm's demand curve that occurs when additional firms enter a monopolistically competitive market.
Short-run and long-run equilibrium in monopolistically competitive markets
Let's examine the determination of short-run equilibrium in a monopolistically competitive output market.
The diagram below illustrates a possible short-run equilibrium for a typical firm in a monopolistically competitive market. As with any profit-maximizing firm, a monopolistically competitive firm maximizes its profits by producing at a level of output at which MR = MC. In the diagram below, this occurs at an output level of Qo. The price is determined by the amount that customers are willing to pay to buy Qo units of output. In the example below, the demand curve indicates that a price of Po will be charged when Qo units of output are sold.
In a monopoly industry, economics profits could persist indefinitely due to the existence of barriers to entry. In a monopolistically competitive industry, however, the existence of economic profits results in the entry of additional firms into the industry. As additional firms enter, the demand for each ...
This presentation by Stephen Davies (Professor of Economics, University of East Anglia, UK) was delivered during a workshop on “Methodologies to measure market competition” held virtually for competition authorities officials on 23 February 2021. More materials on the topic can be found at http://oe.cd/mmkts.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent
The paper has an empirical study on the degree of China trust market competition based on PanzarRosse model, using the panel data of 43 trust companies during the year of 2008-2012.The empirical result shows
that China trust has market structure of monopolistic competition. Furthermore, the paper reveals the factors
leading to China turst market structure of monopolistic competition, which includes the declining trend in the
degree of China turst market concentration, prominent homogenization of trust products, and obvious features of
the administrative region segmentation.
The document discusses issues with using aggregate Census data to analyze trends in market concentration and competition. Census data masks what is happening in relevant antitrust markets and can show increasing concentration even when it does not occur in markets. Three illustrations show how observed concentration can increase in Census data due to mergers, market growth, or entry without actual changes in market concentration. Studies of airline and banking markets found national concentration increased but local market concentration did not. Competition law should not prevent concentration increases from efficient growth or random changes.
This document discusses how to measure industry concentration to determine the market structure of an industry. There are two main measures:
1. Concentration ratio - Measures the percentage of total industry output produced by the largest 4 firms. A ratio over 40% indicates an oligopolistic market structure.
2. Herfindahl Index - Calculates the sum of the squared market shares of all firms in an industry. It ranges from 0 to 10,000 with scores over 1,800 indicating high concentration.
The document provides examples calculating both measures using hypothetical industry data. It interprets the results and explains how the Herfindahl Index improves on the concentration ratio by accounting for differences in the distribution of market shares among firms.
The document defines key concepts in industrial economics, including:
1) A firm is a business unit owned by entrepreneurs engaged in production, while an industry is a group of firms producing homogeneous products using similar techniques.
2) A market connects buyers and sellers of a commodity and is defined by low cross-elasticity of demand between goods. Markets can be imperfect due to information issues or entry barriers.
3) Market structure considers the number and size of firms/buyers, product differentiation, and entry conditions. Structures include monopoly, oligopoly, and monopolistic competition.
4) Market power denotes a firm's control over variables like price and output. Competition reduces power
This document defines the characteristics of perfect competition and outlines the necessary conditions for a perfectly competitive market. It explains that in perfect competition, there are many small firms and buyers/sellers that are price takers, homogeneous products, free entry and exit, and perfect information. Firms produce at the quantity where price equals marginal cost to maximize profits. In the long run, perfect competition leads to zero economic profits and constant costs as firms enter and exit the market.
The document summarizes the structure-conduct-performance (SCP) paradigm, which provides a framework for analyzing the relationship between industrial structure, conduct, and performance. It describes the key components of market structure, including concentration, product differentiation, entry conditions, and integration. Market structure influences firm conduct and pricing policies. Market performance refers to economic results and is evaluated based on efficiency, output relative to input, and progressiveness. The major market structures are perfect competition, monopoly, oligopoly, and monopolistic competition.
MARKET STRUCTURES AND PRICING
Concept of market structures
Perfect competition market and price determination
Monopoly and abnormal profits
Monopolistic Competition
Price Discrimination
Oligopoly-Features of oligopoly
Syndicating in oligopoly
Kinked demand curve
Price leadership and market positioning
Conditions for Company Equilibrium
To achieve Equilibrium, a Company must meet two conditions:
You need to make sure that the marginal revenue is equal to the marginal cost (MR = MC).
If MR> MC, the Company has an incentive to expand production and sell additional units.
If MR<MC, the Company needs to reduce production because additional units generate more costs than revenue.
Only when MR = MC does the Company achieve maximum profit.
This document defines different market structures and their key characteristics. It discusses perfect competition, monopolistic competition, oligopoly, and monopoly. For each structure, it provides the number of firms, product types, barriers to entry, real world examples, and how demand and supply behave. The objectives are to understand how these structures differ and why they exist. Market structures help firms determine pricing strategies and output levels to maximize profits.
The document discusses different market structures including perfect competition, monopoly, monopolistic competition, and oligopoly. It describes the key characteristics of each structure such as the number of firms, level of product differentiation, barriers to entry/exit, and firm behavior. Perfect competition has many small firms, homogeneous products, free entry/exit, and firms are price takers. Monopoly has a single firm with barriers to entry and some control over price. Monopolistic competition and oligopoly involve multiple firms with varying degrees of product differentiation and imperfect competition.
The document discusses different market structures including perfect competition, monopoly, monopolistic competition, and oligopoly. It describes the key characteristics of each structure such as the number of firms, level of product differentiation, barriers to entry/exit, and firm behavior. Perfect competition has many small firms, homogeneous products, free entry/exit, and firms are price takers. Monopoly has a single firm with barriers to entry and some control over price. Monopolistic competition and oligopoly involve multiple firms with varying degrees of product differentiation and imperfect competition.
The document discusses different market structures including perfect competition, monopoly, monopolistic competition, and oligopoly. It describes the key characteristics of each structure such as the number of firms, level of product differentiation, barriers to entry/exit, and firm behavior. Perfect competition has many small firms, homogeneous products, free entry/exit, and firms are price takers. Monopoly has a single firm with barriers to entry and some control over price. Monopolistic competition and oligopoly involve multiple firms with varying degrees of product differentiation and imperfect competition.
The document discusses Porter's five forces model and different market structures. It defines perfect competition, monopolistic competition, oligopoly, and monopoly market structures. It also discusses economies of scale, the four-firm concentration ratio, and the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) for measuring market concentration. Several questions are posed about these topics and answered in the document.
This document provides an overview of collusive oligopoly and price leadership models. It defines collusive oligopoly as when oligopolistic firms make joint pricing and output decisions through agreement. Price leadership is described as an informal practice where one firm sets prices that other firms closely follow. Two types of price leadership are discussed: by a low-cost firm, and by a dominant firm that has large market share. The document also explains barometric price leadership, where the most experienced firm assesses market conditions and sets prices others willingly follow.
This document discusses Porter's five forces model and different market structures including perfect competition, monopolistic competition, oligopoly, and monopoly. It also defines economies of scale and discusses the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) measure of market concentration. Several questions are asked about short run vs long run decisions, the marginal product and average product of labor, and increasing productivity.
This document provides an overview of fundamental analysis and technical analysis for evaluating securities. Fundamental analysis examines underlying company and economic factors that may influence a security's price, such as revenues, profits, growth rates, risks. It analyzes these factors at an economy, industry and company level. Technical analysis focuses on historical price movements and trading volume through chart patterns and indicators to predict future price movements and identify trading opportunities. Charts like line charts, bar charts and candlestick charts are used to visualize price trends and trading patterns over time.
CA NOTES ON MARKETS IN BUSINESS ECONOMICS
FREE AFFIDAVITS AND NOTICES FORMATS
FREE AGREEMENTS AND CONTRACTS FORMATS
FREE LLB LAW NOTES
FREE CA ICWA NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FIRST SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW SECOND SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW THIRD SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FOURTH SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FIFTH SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW SIXTH SEM NOTES
FREE CA ICWA FOUNDATION NOTES
FREE CA ICWA INTERMEDIATE NOTES
FREE CA ICWA FINAL NOTES
KANOON KE RAKHWALE INDIA
HIRE LAWYER ONLINE
LAW FIRMS IN DELHI
CA FIRM DELHI
VISIT : https://www.kanoonkerakhwale.com/
VISIT : https://hirelawyeronline.com/
This presentation looks at four kinds of formal institutional structures in India that have evolved for improving the rural livelihood, namely- private company model which is involved in a primary produce, a cooperative model established by act of legislature, a non-governmental organization (NGO) led project-based intervention model, and a producer company (PC) model which has been a recent development in the Indian economic scenario
The document discusses the role of social capital and its link to human capital. It defines social capital as social structures and networks that facilitate actions and allow people and institutions to achieve common goals. It examines how bonding social capital like parental involvement affects children's education levels, and how bridging social capital like professional networks and career counseling impact educational attainment. The findings show that higher education outcomes depend on household income, and that future career decisions are influenced by information gathered from trusted networks outside the family.
This paper explores the causation and relationship between social capital and human capital formation using primary data. The findings of the survey suggests significant relation between the two variables when controlled for time duration. Significant gender-specific linkages have also emerged from this survey
This document discusses enabling participatory democracy through information and communication technologies (ICT). It argues that existing democracies have become disconnected from citizens and that ICT could help address issues like information asymmetry and limited civic engagement. However, significant barriers like rural-urban and gender divides in Internet access must be overcome. If ICT assets become more accessible and governments use technologies to facilitate two-way information sharing and public opinion formation, it could help make democracies more participatory.
A guide to the understanding of dynamic processes. Calculus of variations was the first step towards understanding the functioning of dynamic process that occur around us, be it the living world or man-made mechanisms.
The document discusses endogenous growth theory and the role of education in economic growth, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. It presents Lucas' endogenous growth model and proposes additional models to analyze factors determining the utilization of human capital and government expenditure on education. It finds that sub-Saharan Africa faces an "education trap" characterized by low enrollment, high costs and dropouts. International aid has neglected tertiary education; increasing access could accelerate technological catch-up. Reallocating resources from low- to high-ability households may help economies escape the trap.
The document discusses theories of labor market segmentation. It describes the dual labor market theory which depicts a primary market of stable unionized jobs and a secondary market of unstable low-paying jobs. It also discusses the internal and external labor market theory, and the Abowd, Kramarz, and Margolis analysis which statistically decomposes wages into internal firm effects and external market effects to estimate the internal-external wage differential. Empirical issues around validating theories of segmentation are also noted.
Singapore started as a small fishing village but became a major trading colony and strategic seaport under British rule. It gained independence in 1965 and has grown to be one of the most prosperous nations through an export-oriented, capitalist free market economy with strong foreign investment. Its small land area is offset by strong human capital and strategic location for trade. Key drivers of economic growth have been exports like pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, financial services, and tourism leveraging its business environment and connections in Asia-Pacific. Singapore consistently ranks highly on indicators of ease of doing business, low corruption, trade, skilled labor, and quality of life.
Best practices for project execution and deliveryCLIVE MINCHIN
A select set of project management best practices to keep your project on-track, on-cost and aligned to scope. Many firms have don't have the necessary skills, diligence, methods and oversight of their projects; this leads to slippage, higher costs and longer timeframes. Often firms have a history of projects that simply failed to move the needle. These best practices will help your firm avoid these pitfalls but they require fortitude to apply.
The Genesis of BriansClub.cm Famous Dark WEb PlatformSabaaSudozai
BriansClub.cm, a famous platform on the dark web, has become one of the most infamous carding marketplaces, specializing in the sale of stolen credit card data.
Event Report - SAP Sapphire 2024 Orlando - lots of innovation and old challengesHolger Mueller
Holger Mueller of Constellation Research shares his key takeaways from SAP's Sapphire confernece, held in Orlando, June 3rd till 5th 2024, in the Orange Convention Center.
The 10 Most Influential Leaders Guiding Corporate Evolution, 2024.pdfthesiliconleaders
In the recent edition, The 10 Most Influential Leaders Guiding Corporate Evolution, 2024, The Silicon Leaders magazine gladly features Dejan Štancer, President of the Global Chamber of Business Leaders (GCBL), along with other leaders.
SATTA MATKA SATTA FAST RESULT KALYAN TOP MATKA RESULT KALYAN SATTA MATKA FAST RESULT MILAN RATAN RAJDHANI MAIN BAZAR MATKA FAST TIPS RESULT MATKA CHART JODI CHART PANEL CHART FREE FIX GAME SATTAMATKA ! MATKA MOBI SATTA 143 spboss.in TOP NO1 RESULT FULL RATE MATKA ONLINE GAME PLAY BY APP SPBOSS
[To download this presentation, visit:
https://www.oeconsulting.com.sg/training-presentations]
This PowerPoint compilation offers a comprehensive overview of 20 leading innovation management frameworks and methodologies, selected for their broad applicability across various industries and organizational contexts. These frameworks are valuable resources for a wide range of users, including business professionals, educators, and consultants.
Each framework is presented with visually engaging diagrams and templates, ensuring the content is both informative and appealing. While this compilation is thorough, please note that the slides are intended as supplementary resources and may not be sufficient for standalone instructional purposes.
This compilation is ideal for anyone looking to enhance their understanding of innovation management and drive meaningful change within their organization. Whether you aim to improve product development processes, enhance customer experiences, or drive digital transformation, these frameworks offer valuable insights and tools to help you achieve your goals.
INCLUDED FRAMEWORKS/MODELS:
1. Stanford’s Design Thinking
2. IDEO’s Human-Centered Design
3. Strategyzer’s Business Model Innovation
4. Lean Startup Methodology
5. Agile Innovation Framework
6. Doblin’s Ten Types of Innovation
7. McKinsey’s Three Horizons of Growth
8. Customer Journey Map
9. Christensen’s Disruptive Innovation Theory
10. Blue Ocean Strategy
11. Strategyn’s Jobs-To-Be-Done (JTBD) Framework with Job Map
12. Design Sprint Framework
13. The Double Diamond
14. Lean Six Sigma DMAIC
15. TRIZ Problem-Solving Framework
16. Edward de Bono’s Six Thinking Hats
17. Stage-Gate Model
18. Toyota’s Six Steps of Kaizen
19. Microsoft’s Digital Transformation Framework
20. Design for Six Sigma (DFSS)
To download this presentation, visit:
https://www.oeconsulting.com.sg/training-presentations
How MJ Global Leads the Packaging Industry.pdfMJ Global
MJ Global's success in staying ahead of the curve in the packaging industry is a testament to its dedication to innovation, sustainability, and customer-centricity. By embracing technological advancements, leading in eco-friendly solutions, collaborating with industry leaders, and adapting to evolving consumer preferences, MJ Global continues to set new standards in the packaging sector.
Company Valuation webinar series - Tuesday, 4 June 2024FelixPerez547899
This session provided an update as to the latest valuation data in the UK and then delved into a discussion on the upcoming election and the impacts on valuation. We finished, as always with a Q&A
Discover timeless style with the 2022 Vintage Roman Numerals Men's Ring. Crafted from premium stainless steel, this 6mm wide ring embodies elegance and durability. Perfect as a gift, it seamlessly blends classic Roman numeral detailing with modern sophistication, making it an ideal accessory for any occasion.
https://rb.gy/usj1a2
Storytelling is an incredibly valuable tool to share data and information. To get the most impact from stories there are a number of key ingredients. These are based on science and human nature. Using these elements in a story you can deliver information impactfully, ensure action and drive change.
How are Lilac French Bulldogs Beauty Charming the World and Capturing Hearts....Lacey Max
“After being the most listed dog breed in the United States for 31
years in a row, the Labrador Retriever has dropped to second place
in the American Kennel Club's annual survey of the country's most
popular canines. The French Bulldog is the new top dog in the
United States as of 2022. The stylish puppy has ascended the
rankings in rapid time despite having health concerns and limited
color choices.”
HOW TO START UP A COMPANY A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE.pdf46adnanshahzad
How to Start Up a Company: A Step-by-Step Guide Starting a company is an exciting adventure that combines creativity, strategy, and hard work. It can seem overwhelming at first, but with the right guidance, anyone can transform a great idea into a successful business. Let's dive into how to start up a company, from the initial spark of an idea to securing funding and launching your startup.
Introduction
Have you ever dreamed of turning your innovative idea into a thriving business? Starting a company involves numerous steps and decisions, but don't worry—we're here to help. Whether you're exploring how to start a startup company or wondering how to start up a small business, this guide will walk you through the process, step by step.
Structural Design Process: Step-by-Step Guide for BuildingsChandresh Chudasama
The structural design process is explained: Follow our step-by-step guide to understand building design intricacies and ensure structural integrity. Learn how to build wonderful buildings with the help of our detailed information. Learn how to create structures with durability and reliability and also gain insights on ways of managing structures.
At Techbox Square, in Singapore, we're not just creative web designers and developers, we're the driving force behind your brand identity. Contact us today.
Industrial Tech SW: Category Renewal and CreationChristian Dahlen
Every industrial revolution has created a new set of categories and a new set of players.
Multiple new technologies have emerged, but Samsara and C3.ai are only two companies which have gone public so far.
Manufacturing startups constitute the largest pipeline share of unicorns and IPO candidates in the SF Bay Area, and software startups dominate in Germany.
2. Aggregation of some firm numbers
Could be determined either from the
demand side or the supply side
INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS is that
application of microeconomic theory which
analyses firms, markets and industries
(Stigler 1968)
What is an industry
3. Grouping of firms together based on
certain common characteristics
Certain factors that describe the state of
the market with respect to competition
among the firms
The most common market form observed
is that of oligopolies
Market Structure
4. The S-C-P paradigm
The model used to analyse the framework
of any industry; how does it work
Structure: number and size distribution
Conduct: behavior and actions taken by
the firms in the market
Performance: product efficiency, allocative
efficiency and economic growth
5. Criteria for judgment
As mentioned that in the real
world, oligopoly is the prominent market
type, both loose and tight, we will
concentrate on the analysis of measuring
oligopolies
Measurement of market shares describes
the relative position of a firm within the
industry; certain ratios capture the
ralationship between firm numbers and
their respective shares
6. Concentration ratio- how much of the
total industry output is manufactured by
the largest firms; the popular four-firm
concentration ratio is given by-
C4 = (S1 + S2 + S3 + S4)/ ST =
w1+w2+w3+w4
S: sales of individual firms; w: market
share
A high concentration ratio reflects
monopoly power
Market indices
7. Example- let an industry consist of 6
firms; 4 firms have sales of $1 million
each and the rest two have a sales figure
of $500,000 each. Then the 4-firm
concentration ratio gives-
Total industry sales- $5mn, sales of the top
four- $4mn, therefore C4= 4/5 = .8 or
80%
The ratio lies between 0 and 1; closer to
zero indicates high competition among a
large no. of sellers while a value near to 1
shows low competition within the industry
8. Market indices
Hirschman-Herfindahl Index (HHI)-it is
a measure of the sum of squared market
shares within an industry i
by squaring the shares before adding
them up, HHI gives more weightage to the
firms with higher market share. Its
formula is given by-
HHi= (mkt share1)2+ (mkt
share2)2+…..till n
or HHI =10,000 ∑wi2,
9. Example- supposing an industry consists
of three firms wherein, 2 firms have sales
of $1mn each and one has a $3mn sales
figure.
Total industry sales is $5mn, mkt share of
the largest firm-3/5= .6 and it is .2 for the
other two. Thus HHI for this industry is-
10,000[(.6)2 + (.2)2 + (.2)2]=4,400
The index value lies between 0 and 10,000;
a 10,000 value implies the existence of a
monopolist and a zero value speaks the
existence of infinitesimally small firms
10. The table above brings out the comparison
between the n-firm concentration ratio and the
HHI. It is observable that as the number of firms
reduces, HHI rises rapidly. Compared to the 4-
firm concentration ratio which gives a wrong
image due to its design fault, HHI captures the
market shares of all the firms in the industry.
11. There are other indices relating to the
Conduct and Performance of an industry.
What we’ve seen is the measure of the
market Structure for a given industry.
Rothschild Index- measure of the demand
condition; how sensitive is an individual
firm’s demand relative to the entire
market
Lerner’s Index- measuring the behaviour
of firms; how much the firms in an
industry mark-up their prices over their
marginal cost
12. Thus the S-C-P approach provides the
framework to understand an industry
structure, the way the firms within a given
industry conduct themselves and reflect
on their performance vis-à-vis the
economy
It makes government policy more
applicable by taking account of the
demand and supply factors that influence
the industry, and finally
Outlines a regulatory framework within
which organizations need to operate