The document discusses getting published in academic journals and conferences. It outlines the typical structure of a research paper, including an introduction, literature review, methodology, evaluation, conclusions, and bibliography. It notes the benefits of publishing include sharing knowledge, career advancement, and feedback. Journals are typically higher impact but have a longer review process, while conferences allow networking but involve fees. The review process and addressing reviewer feedback is also summarized.

1. Academic Writing
Getting Published in International Journals and Conferences
Dr.Natalia Konstantinova1
1Research Institute in Information and Language Processing
University of Wolverhampton
12 April, 2014
Dr.Natalia Konstantinova (University of Wolverhampton) Academic Writing 12 April, 2014 1 / 23

2. Outline
1 Introduction
2 Research Papers
Typical structure
Structure: More Details
3 Questions?
Dr.Natalia Konstantinova (University of Wolverhampton) Academic Writing 12 April, 2014 2 / 23

3. Introduction
Why to publish?
Share your knowledge with others;
Get recognition for your work, acquire new contacts;
Get feedback from the reviewers;
Add to your CV;
Dr.Natalia Konstantinova (University of Wolverhampton) Academic Writing 12 April, 2014 3 / 23

4. Introduction
Where to publish?
Different quality standards, selectiveness and impact:
Journals
more impact (especially long-term impact);
more highly rated by selection/promotion committees;
more thorough reviews;
more space (usually about 20 pages);
Conference proceedings
faster process;
quality of reviews depends on your luck;
you have to pay conference fees;
direct contacts can be made at the conference;
Dr.Natalia Konstantinova (University of Wolverhampton) Academic Writing 12 April, 2014 4 / 23

5. Introduction
What to check before submitting?
Avoid poor quality journals and conferences;
Dr.Natalia Konstantinova (University of Wolverhampton) Academic Writing 12 April, 2014 5 / 23

6. Introduction
What to check before submitting? (2)
Before sending check:
Where the proceedings are published/reputation of the journal;
Programme committee;
Submission topics;
Submission guidelines;
Dr.Natalia Konstantinova (University of Wolverhampton) Academic Writing 12 April, 2014 6 / 23

7. Introduction
Review lifecycle
Submit a paper;
It gets assigned 3-4 reviewers;
Review process (conference: about 2 weeks- 1 month, journal: 2-3
months);
Get decision (binary for conferences, n-ary for a journal):
Decline/reject;
Revise and resubmit (cannot be accepted in the current form and needs
revision);
Major (can be accepted but needs major changes);
Minor (can be accepted but needs minor adjustments);
Accept as it is;
Address comments of the reviewers and send paper again;
Dr.Natalia Konstantinova (University of Wolverhampton) Academic Writing 12 April, 2014 7 / 23

8. Introduction
Review
Address reviewer’s comments:
Dr.Natalia Konstantinova (University of Wolverhampton) Academic Writing 12 April, 2014 8 / 23

9. Research Papers Typical structure
Typical structure
Title
Abstract
Introduction
Related work
Resources/data collection
Methodology
Evaluation
Error analysis
Conclusions and future research
Bibliography
Dr.Natalia Konstantinova (University of Wolverhampton) Academic Writing 12 April, 2014 10 / 23

10. Research Papers Structure: More Details
Title and Abstract
Should reflect the content of the paper;
Abstract should present the main idea of the paper and its main
contribution;
Dr.Natalia Konstantinova (University of Wolverhampton) Academic Writing 12 April, 2014 12 / 23

11. Research Papers Structure: More Details
Related work
We show awareness of the research in the area;
We describe existing methods;
We describe why our research is different from everything that was
done before;
Dr.Natalia Konstantinova (University of Wolverhampton) Academic Writing 12 April, 2014 13 / 23

12. Research Papers Structure: More Details
Related work(2)
Mistakes:
Not up-to-date research;
Too narrow;
Too broad;
Fail to show the difference with your research;
Dr.Natalia Konstantinova (University of Wolverhampton) Academic Writing 12 April, 2014 14 / 23

13. Research Papers Structure: More Details
Data
Description of your data;
The way the data was collected (for example, the description of the
corpus or dataset);
If special annotation of the data was done (for example, guidelines for
annotators, inter-annotator agreement ,etc.)
Dr.Natalia Konstantinova (University of Wolverhampton) Academic Writing 12 April, 2014 15 / 23

14. Research Papers Structure: More Details
Methodology
How your experiment was done?
All the steps to re-produce it;
What rules/techniques you used?
Ideally other researchers should be able to reproduce your experiment;
Dr.Natalia Konstantinova (University of Wolverhampton) Academic Writing 12 April, 2014 16 / 23

15. Research Papers Structure: More Details
Evaluation
A very important part of your research! Why do we need evaluation?
Allows to assess the results of a method or a system;
Allows to compare results of different methods and systems;
Allows to understand why method fails or which parts create
problems;
How the evaluation was done?
What metrics were used?
What are the baselines?
What gold standard?
Dr.Natalia Konstantinova (University of Wolverhampton) Academic Writing 12 April, 2014 17 / 23

16. Research Papers Structure: More Details
Error analysis
Most probably your method gives errors;
Analyse them;
Try to group;
Try to explain why they occur;
Suggest ways to tackle them in the future research; Or describe why
you cannot make it better;
Dr.Natalia Konstantinova (University of Wolverhampton) Academic Writing 12 April, 2014 18 / 23

17. Research Papers Structure: More Details
Conclusions and future work
Make final conclusions about your experiment;
Was your hypothesis proved?
Did you get a better performance than someone else?
Why your performance is valuable?
Describe what you plan to do in the future;
Are you planning to address some shortcomings of the current
research?
Do you want to use some other data set?
Dr.Natalia Konstantinova (University of Wolverhampton) Academic Writing 12 April, 2014 19 / 23

18. Research Papers Structure: More Details
Bibliography
Should be consistent;
Should contain all needed information (pages, publisher etc.);
Better use some reference style;
Dr.Natalia Konstantinova (University of Wolverhampton) Academic Writing 12 April, 2014 20 / 23

19. Research Papers Structure: More Details
Tips
Make sure it is clear;
Readers should be able to re-produce your experiment;
English and formatting are important!
Negative results are still results! But! You need to have solid
methodology!
Dr.Natalia Konstantinova (University of Wolverhampton) Academic Writing 12 April, 2014 21 / 23

20. Research Papers Structure: More Details
Further Links
http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/people/pbailey/
sigir-paper-writing-tips.aspx?1702280376
http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/~jw/paper.html
http://www.journalprep.com/FILES/How_to_Write_and_
Publish_an_Academic_Research_Paper.pdf
http://archosaurmusings.wordpress.com/2008/08/30/
how-to-write-a-paper-and-get-it-published/
Dr.Natalia Konstantinova (University of Wolverhampton) Academic Writing 12 April, 2014 22 / 23

21. Questions?
Questions
Dr.Natalia Konstantinova (University of Wolverhampton) Academic Writing 12 April, 2014 23 / 23