Agile software development is an iterative approach that values individuals and interactions, working software over documentation, customer collaboration over contract negotiation, and responding to change over following a plan. It promotes adaptive planning, evolutionary development, and delivery of working software frequently in short iterations to maximize flexibility and deliver value to customers.
This document summarizes an overview of agile project management presented by Carter Engelhart. It discusses that agile methods allow for flexible responses to changing requirements. Traditional project management can lead to chaos or underperformance on IT projects. Agile methods emphasize iterative development, empowered teams, frequent delivery, and addressing changing requirements. The benefits of agile include reduced risk, improved control through frequent feedback, and the ability to adapt to changes.
Presentation given at the Kansas City Chapter of PMI several years ago. Examines and details 4 failed projects, their effects and how they were dealt with.
This document summarizes a post-mortem review of a web application project completed by a team of students. It provides details of the project scope, team composition, timeline, methodology, and reviews each project phase. Key metrics like functional size, resource allocation, documentation, and lessons learned are reported. Overall, the project was completed on time while respecting deadlines and delivering good quality, though the actual team composition differed from what was considered ideal.
The old definition of project management involved lengthy meetings, complex charts and diagrams, and delayed responses. Collaboration tools were difficult to use and did not enable effective collaboration. New online project management and collaboration tools were created to be easy to use, accessible from anywhere, and better enable teamwork without the complexities of prior tools. ProofHub is presented as one such online tool that allows teams to plan, organize, assign tasks, share files, collaborate, track progress, record time, and gain feedback in a centralized location from any device.
Project managers can improve project outcomes by (1) shaping projects around business architecture, (2) ensuring traceability from early lifecycle stages, and (3) conducting impact analysis to support business agility. This allows making quality, schedule, and results more predictable.
This document provides a template for a project post mortem report to record lessons learned from completed projects. The template includes sections for report details, project parameters, performance including accomplishments and problems, lessons learned, and approval. It is intended to inform future project teams of obstacles, challenges, successes and ways to improve aspects like planning, resources, scope, scheduling and more.
The Agile Alliance has Stated in their ManifestoGlen Alleman
This document discusses and analyzes the principles outlined in the Agile Alliance manifesto. It notes that while the principles seem logical, unlike other manifestos they do not clearly define the domain or context in which they are meant to be applied. As a result, the principles risk being too general and unclear to implement effectively. The document then examines each principle individually, noting that more context and guidance is needed to understand how to apply them in specific domains or situations. Overall, it finds the principles have value but would benefit from more specialized guidance on their practical implementation.
This document summarizes an overview of agile project management presented by Carter Engelhart. It discusses that agile methods allow for flexible responses to changing requirements. Traditional project management can lead to chaos or underperformance on IT projects. Agile methods emphasize iterative development, empowered teams, frequent delivery, and addressing changing requirements. The benefits of agile include reduced risk, improved control through frequent feedback, and the ability to adapt to changes.
Presentation given at the Kansas City Chapter of PMI several years ago. Examines and details 4 failed projects, their effects and how they were dealt with.
This document summarizes a post-mortem review of a web application project completed by a team of students. It provides details of the project scope, team composition, timeline, methodology, and reviews each project phase. Key metrics like functional size, resource allocation, documentation, and lessons learned are reported. Overall, the project was completed on time while respecting deadlines and delivering good quality, though the actual team composition differed from what was considered ideal.
The old definition of project management involved lengthy meetings, complex charts and diagrams, and delayed responses. Collaboration tools were difficult to use and did not enable effective collaboration. New online project management and collaboration tools were created to be easy to use, accessible from anywhere, and better enable teamwork without the complexities of prior tools. ProofHub is presented as one such online tool that allows teams to plan, organize, assign tasks, share files, collaborate, track progress, record time, and gain feedback in a centralized location from any device.
Project managers can improve project outcomes by (1) shaping projects around business architecture, (2) ensuring traceability from early lifecycle stages, and (3) conducting impact analysis to support business agility. This allows making quality, schedule, and results more predictable.
This document provides a template for a project post mortem report to record lessons learned from completed projects. The template includes sections for report details, project parameters, performance including accomplishments and problems, lessons learned, and approval. It is intended to inform future project teams of obstacles, challenges, successes and ways to improve aspects like planning, resources, scope, scheduling and more.
The Agile Alliance has Stated in their ManifestoGlen Alleman
This document discusses and analyzes the principles outlined in the Agile Alliance manifesto. It notes that while the principles seem logical, unlike other manifestos they do not clearly define the domain or context in which they are meant to be applied. As a result, the principles risk being too general and unclear to implement effectively. The document then examines each principle individually, noting that more context and guidance is needed to understand how to apply them in specific domains or situations. Overall, it finds the principles have value but would benefit from more specialized guidance on their practical implementation.
PM Chapter on Agile IT Project Management MethodsGlen Alleman
The nations prosperity depends of information technology (IT) software. The nation’s IT software industry depends on the timely delivery of high quality products to eager customers. This industry is slipping further behind in quality and timely delivery every year. The gap continues to grow.
Applying agile and lean principles to the governance of software and systems ...IBM Rational software
This document discusses applying lean principles to governance of software development projects. It outlines 18 practices that define a lean approach, including embedding governance into tools, processes, and guidance to make it easy for teams to stay on track. The practices bring lean thinking used in supply chain management into governance of software development. Some key principles discussed are eliminating waste, focusing on value, understanding workflow and dependencies, and making governance processes transparent and collaborative rather than command and control.
The document discusses signs that a project is in trouble and provides recommendations for getting a failing project back on track. It notes that common signs include missed deadlines, declining quality, low morale, and lost customer confidence. The key recommendations are to cut scope, increase productivity, or slip the schedule. The document also emphasizes focusing on the three P's - people, process, and product. It provides specific suggestions in each of these areas, such as improving communication and leadership, stabilizing requirements, and breaking work into smaller milestones. Regularly reassessing progress and the recovery plan is also stressed.
Slides that helps you to know the major skills of Project Manager, and it describes the fundamentals of Project Management which is a very important part of Software Engineering.
Paradigm Shift for Project Managers in Agile ProjectsBharani M
This document discusses the paradigm shift needed for project managers in agile projects. It explains that traditional project management roles focused on rigid control and planning, which does not fit with agile methodologies that emphasize flexibility, iteration, and customer collaboration. The document argues that in agile projects, the project manager's role should shift from "taskmaster" to leader. As a leader, the project manager focuses on goals, teamwork, removing obstacles, and adapting to change rather than strict control and documentation. This allows the development team to self-organize their work while the manager provides high-level guidance to help ensure success.
Video in Russian: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJFVAbWZInE
Talk given with Agile-Latvia.org at TSI.lv for CS students, revealing Agile principles through real life stories and examples.
Why Projects Fail + Four Steps to SucceedKevin Wordon
Understand why digital and IT projects fail and discover four simple project management tips to succeed.
Topics covered:
- Agile Decision Making
- The OODA Loop
- Clear Direction & Common Goals
- Defining Requirements
- Forming Your Project Team
Estimation of agile functionality in software developmentBashir Nasr Azadani
Estimation of Agile Functionality in Software Development - ISBN: 978-988-98671-8-8
Publication date: Mar 21, 2008 presented at International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists 2008 Vol I
Agile project management is a contemporary approach to managing software development projects that values interacting with skilled individuals, delivering working software products, establishing close customer interaction, and adopting quick changes. Some popular agile methodologies include eXtreme Programming, Scrum, Feature Driven Development, and Lean Software Development. The goals of agile project management include executing projects faster and developing software with higher customer satisfaction through regular adaptation, constant collaboration, and iterative development processes.
importance of resources allocation in formal method of software engineering ...abdulrafaychaudhry
This document discusses key concepts related to project management including resource allocation, software risks, differences between products and projects, discount factors, net present value, and net profit.
The main points are:
1) Resource allocation in project management is important for planning, scheduling, and controlling workload to improve team effectiveness. It involves identifying and tracking resources like budget, tools, and time.
2) The top five software risks are inherent schedule flaws, requirements inflation, employee turnover, specification breakdown, and poor productivity. Agile methods aim to mitigate these risks through practices like iterative planning and prioritization.
3) The key difference between a product and project is that a product is manufactured and sold while a project is built to
The document discusses seven principles of lean software development:
1. Eliminate waste - Anything that doesn't add value to the product is considered waste. Tools are used to identify and reduce waste.
2. Amplify learning - Software development relies on learning through short feedback loops. Tools like frequent testing and prototyping are used to increase feedback.
3. Decide as late as possible - High stakes decisions are deferred until necessary to increase flexibility. Options thinking and asynchronous development help with this.
This document discusses activities and time planning for software project management. It covers topics like motivation for studying project management due to poor track records of IT projects, the definition of a project, attributes of projects, examples of IT projects, and the nine knowledge areas of project management. It also discusses a hierarchy of activities including work breakdown structure, advantages and disadvantages of project management, and the growing project management profession.
The document discusses a software development process designed for small projects. It begins by outlining some of the challenges small projects face, such as having fewer team members and more external dependencies. It then describes the authors' process, which integrates portions of iterative and incremental development models with quality assurance and measurement processes. The goal is to produce high quality results on time with less overhead than typical processes designed for large projects. Key aspects of the process include its iterative nature, use of inspections to ensure quality, and measurements to support process improvement.
Introduction to Agile Project ManagementSemen Arslan
This document provides an overview of project management methodologies, including Waterfall, SDLC, RAD, and Agile. It discusses the key aspects of each methodology such as phases, pros and cons. The Waterfall methodology is explained in more detail covering its linear phases from requirements to maintenance. Agile project management is also summarized, outlining its key principles of focusing on customer value, working in small batches with integrated teams, and making continuous improvements. Complexity theory and how Agile projects can be viewed as complex adaptive systems is briefly introduced.
UCISA Major Project Governance Assessment ToolkitMark Ritchie
Universities and colleges are constantly undertaking significant change activities. These activities will typically be managed using existing institutional project and change management processes. Often, however, there is a lack of consistency and rigour in the governance approach. This can lead to significant cost overruns and project failure when confronted with the challenges of a major change project. Major projects require a more rigorous approach to governance and project management to deliver success.
The UCISA Major Project Governance Assessment Toolkit has been developed to assist staff who are managing or participating in major change projects.
The toolkit provides:
a) guidance on assessing which projects should be classed as Major
b) the key governance elements that must be managed for Major projects
c) an assessment tool for project governance to help ensure that the required governance actions are established and work effectively throughout the life of the project
d) a visualisation tool for project governance which gives a view of the project as it currently stands and the changes since the last review
e) case studies on the use of the toolkit at the University of Edinburgh
The toolkit has been designed to be complementary to existing project and change management processes. The toolkit fills an important gap by providing a repeatable assessment process that covers all aspects of governance for Major Projects. The toolkit can be used as a reference point and checklist for any project.
This presentation is from the UCISA15 conference in Ednburgh and may be useful for any organisation wishing to adopt the toolkit.
Project Teams - people issues, roles, and responsibilitiesJohn Cachat
Project Managers
Consultants
Four types of Users
User Responsibilities
Sufficient Resources
Get in the game – this is not practice!
johncachat@hotmail.com
www.peproso.com
Adaptive planning involves planning and execution occurring multiple times for small slices of the product. Each subsequent planning takes input from the previously delivered slice, making it an empirical process. This allows the breaking of dependency between plans and requirement stability seen in predictive planning. Adaptive planning puts people first by having them define and tweak the process based on feedback, making it evolutionary, whereas predictive planning is process first.
Practical Strategies for Project Recovery Webinar SlidesPM Solutions
Organizations spend a lot of money on projects. In the last year alone, the average firm closed US$200 million in projects, according to a just-released study conducted by PM Solutions Research. And more than a third of those projects were troubled. That means US$74 million of those projects were at risk of failure. The good news is that project recoveries are common and firms that proactively undertake successful project recoveries report saving US$50 million on average per firm. Learn what other organizations are doing to recover troubled projects and the significant business results they have been able to realize.
The document outlines a project management plan for developing a complex web server application. It describes the project goal of creating a graphical user interface web server. It then details the resources, including the project leader, developers, testers and a budget of $2,500. It outlines the 5 project phases of specifications, design, implementation, verification and final release. It provides a timeline showing the tasks and estimated durations to complete the project by May 10th, within budget. The conclusions note that OpenProj project management software was used to define the tasks, schedule, resources and costs.
Agile software development is an iterative approach that promotes adaptive planning, evolutionary development, rapid response to change, and close collaboration. It values individuals and interactions, working software, customer collaboration, and responding to change over processes, documentation, contract negotiation, and following a plan. The Agile Manifesto introduced these values in 2001 to provide an alternative to failure-prone processes. Agile methods help teams deliver working software frequently in short iterations to better satisfy customer needs.
Agile software development is an iterative approach to development that promotes adaptive planning, evolutionary development, rapid response to change, and close collaboration. It focuses on individuals and interactions, working software over documentation, customer collaboration over contract negotiation, and responding to change over following a plan. The key principles are satisfying customers through early and continuous delivery, welcoming changing requirements even late in development, frequent delivery of working software, close daily cooperation between business and development, face-to-face communication, and adapting to change through self-organizing teams.
PM Chapter on Agile IT Project Management MethodsGlen Alleman
The nations prosperity depends of information technology (IT) software. The nation’s IT software industry depends on the timely delivery of high quality products to eager customers. This industry is slipping further behind in quality and timely delivery every year. The gap continues to grow.
Applying agile and lean principles to the governance of software and systems ...IBM Rational software
This document discusses applying lean principles to governance of software development projects. It outlines 18 practices that define a lean approach, including embedding governance into tools, processes, and guidance to make it easy for teams to stay on track. The practices bring lean thinking used in supply chain management into governance of software development. Some key principles discussed are eliminating waste, focusing on value, understanding workflow and dependencies, and making governance processes transparent and collaborative rather than command and control.
The document discusses signs that a project is in trouble and provides recommendations for getting a failing project back on track. It notes that common signs include missed deadlines, declining quality, low morale, and lost customer confidence. The key recommendations are to cut scope, increase productivity, or slip the schedule. The document also emphasizes focusing on the three P's - people, process, and product. It provides specific suggestions in each of these areas, such as improving communication and leadership, stabilizing requirements, and breaking work into smaller milestones. Regularly reassessing progress and the recovery plan is also stressed.
Slides that helps you to know the major skills of Project Manager, and it describes the fundamentals of Project Management which is a very important part of Software Engineering.
Paradigm Shift for Project Managers in Agile ProjectsBharani M
This document discusses the paradigm shift needed for project managers in agile projects. It explains that traditional project management roles focused on rigid control and planning, which does not fit with agile methodologies that emphasize flexibility, iteration, and customer collaboration. The document argues that in agile projects, the project manager's role should shift from "taskmaster" to leader. As a leader, the project manager focuses on goals, teamwork, removing obstacles, and adapting to change rather than strict control and documentation. This allows the development team to self-organize their work while the manager provides high-level guidance to help ensure success.
Video in Russian: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJFVAbWZInE
Talk given with Agile-Latvia.org at TSI.lv for CS students, revealing Agile principles through real life stories and examples.
Why Projects Fail + Four Steps to SucceedKevin Wordon
Understand why digital and IT projects fail and discover four simple project management tips to succeed.
Topics covered:
- Agile Decision Making
- The OODA Loop
- Clear Direction & Common Goals
- Defining Requirements
- Forming Your Project Team
Estimation of agile functionality in software developmentBashir Nasr Azadani
Estimation of Agile Functionality in Software Development - ISBN: 978-988-98671-8-8
Publication date: Mar 21, 2008 presented at International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists 2008 Vol I
Agile project management is a contemporary approach to managing software development projects that values interacting with skilled individuals, delivering working software products, establishing close customer interaction, and adopting quick changes. Some popular agile methodologies include eXtreme Programming, Scrum, Feature Driven Development, and Lean Software Development. The goals of agile project management include executing projects faster and developing software with higher customer satisfaction through regular adaptation, constant collaboration, and iterative development processes.
importance of resources allocation in formal method of software engineering ...abdulrafaychaudhry
This document discusses key concepts related to project management including resource allocation, software risks, differences between products and projects, discount factors, net present value, and net profit.
The main points are:
1) Resource allocation in project management is important for planning, scheduling, and controlling workload to improve team effectiveness. It involves identifying and tracking resources like budget, tools, and time.
2) The top five software risks are inherent schedule flaws, requirements inflation, employee turnover, specification breakdown, and poor productivity. Agile methods aim to mitigate these risks through practices like iterative planning and prioritization.
3) The key difference between a product and project is that a product is manufactured and sold while a project is built to
The document discusses seven principles of lean software development:
1. Eliminate waste - Anything that doesn't add value to the product is considered waste. Tools are used to identify and reduce waste.
2. Amplify learning - Software development relies on learning through short feedback loops. Tools like frequent testing and prototyping are used to increase feedback.
3. Decide as late as possible - High stakes decisions are deferred until necessary to increase flexibility. Options thinking and asynchronous development help with this.
This document discusses activities and time planning for software project management. It covers topics like motivation for studying project management due to poor track records of IT projects, the definition of a project, attributes of projects, examples of IT projects, and the nine knowledge areas of project management. It also discusses a hierarchy of activities including work breakdown structure, advantages and disadvantages of project management, and the growing project management profession.
The document discusses a software development process designed for small projects. It begins by outlining some of the challenges small projects face, such as having fewer team members and more external dependencies. It then describes the authors' process, which integrates portions of iterative and incremental development models with quality assurance and measurement processes. The goal is to produce high quality results on time with less overhead than typical processes designed for large projects. Key aspects of the process include its iterative nature, use of inspections to ensure quality, and measurements to support process improvement.
Introduction to Agile Project ManagementSemen Arslan
This document provides an overview of project management methodologies, including Waterfall, SDLC, RAD, and Agile. It discusses the key aspects of each methodology such as phases, pros and cons. The Waterfall methodology is explained in more detail covering its linear phases from requirements to maintenance. Agile project management is also summarized, outlining its key principles of focusing on customer value, working in small batches with integrated teams, and making continuous improvements. Complexity theory and how Agile projects can be viewed as complex adaptive systems is briefly introduced.
UCISA Major Project Governance Assessment ToolkitMark Ritchie
Universities and colleges are constantly undertaking significant change activities. These activities will typically be managed using existing institutional project and change management processes. Often, however, there is a lack of consistency and rigour in the governance approach. This can lead to significant cost overruns and project failure when confronted with the challenges of a major change project. Major projects require a more rigorous approach to governance and project management to deliver success.
The UCISA Major Project Governance Assessment Toolkit has been developed to assist staff who are managing or participating in major change projects.
The toolkit provides:
a) guidance on assessing which projects should be classed as Major
b) the key governance elements that must be managed for Major projects
c) an assessment tool for project governance to help ensure that the required governance actions are established and work effectively throughout the life of the project
d) a visualisation tool for project governance which gives a view of the project as it currently stands and the changes since the last review
e) case studies on the use of the toolkit at the University of Edinburgh
The toolkit has been designed to be complementary to existing project and change management processes. The toolkit fills an important gap by providing a repeatable assessment process that covers all aspects of governance for Major Projects. The toolkit can be used as a reference point and checklist for any project.
This presentation is from the UCISA15 conference in Ednburgh and may be useful for any organisation wishing to adopt the toolkit.
Project Teams - people issues, roles, and responsibilitiesJohn Cachat
Project Managers
Consultants
Four types of Users
User Responsibilities
Sufficient Resources
Get in the game – this is not practice!
johncachat@hotmail.com
www.peproso.com
Adaptive planning involves planning and execution occurring multiple times for small slices of the product. Each subsequent planning takes input from the previously delivered slice, making it an empirical process. This allows the breaking of dependency between plans and requirement stability seen in predictive planning. Adaptive planning puts people first by having them define and tweak the process based on feedback, making it evolutionary, whereas predictive planning is process first.
Practical Strategies for Project Recovery Webinar SlidesPM Solutions
Organizations spend a lot of money on projects. In the last year alone, the average firm closed US$200 million in projects, according to a just-released study conducted by PM Solutions Research. And more than a third of those projects were troubled. That means US$74 million of those projects were at risk of failure. The good news is that project recoveries are common and firms that proactively undertake successful project recoveries report saving US$50 million on average per firm. Learn what other organizations are doing to recover troubled projects and the significant business results they have been able to realize.
The document outlines a project management plan for developing a complex web server application. It describes the project goal of creating a graphical user interface web server. It then details the resources, including the project leader, developers, testers and a budget of $2,500. It outlines the 5 project phases of specifications, design, implementation, verification and final release. It provides a timeline showing the tasks and estimated durations to complete the project by May 10th, within budget. The conclusions note that OpenProj project management software was used to define the tasks, schedule, resources and costs.
Agile software development is an iterative approach that promotes adaptive planning, evolutionary development, rapid response to change, and close collaboration. It values individuals and interactions, working software, customer collaboration, and responding to change over processes, documentation, contract negotiation, and following a plan. The Agile Manifesto introduced these values in 2001 to provide an alternative to failure-prone processes. Agile methods help teams deliver working software frequently in short iterations to better satisfy customer needs.
Agile software development is an iterative approach to development that promotes adaptive planning, evolutionary development, rapid response to change, and close collaboration. It focuses on individuals and interactions, working software over documentation, customer collaboration over contract negotiation, and responding to change over following a plan. The key principles are satisfying customers through early and continuous delivery, welcoming changing requirements even late in development, frequent delivery of working software, close daily cooperation between business and development, face-to-face communication, and adapting to change through self-organizing teams.
The document summarizes key aspects of applying agile principles and practices to medical device software development in a way that is compliant with regulatory requirements. It discusses how agile values such as individuals and interactions over processes and tools, working software over comprehensive documentation, customer collaboration over contract negotiation, and responding to change over following a plan can be aligned with regulatory needs to develop software that is safe, effective, and meets user needs. The document provides examples of how agile practices such as planning, requirements, and documentation can be adapted for medical device software while maintaining regulatory compliance.
Agile software development is a collaborative approach where cross-functional teams work together to deliver working software frequently, such as every few weeks, through self-organization and adaptability. It values interactions, customer collaboration, and responding to change. Some agile methods include Scrum, Extreme Programming, Kanban, and features like co-location, pair programming, and frequent delivery of working software.
The document discusses common pitfalls organizations face when adopting agile processes. It notes that without discipline, agile approaches may fail due to lack of closure on work items and endless scope changes. It also highlights challenges with testing, changes in team roles and responsibilities, and difficulties adjusting working styles to more collaborative ways of working. Critical success factors include training, experience adopting agile, and support from experienced practitioners.
Regardless of what type of work you do, there may be benefits to applying some of the ideas articulated in the Agile Manifesto. This talk illustrates a few first steps you can take and try to uncover opportunities to improve how you deliver value.
The document provides an overview of agile development and some specific agile methodologies. It begins by outlining the key principles of agile development as defined in the Agile Manifesto, including valuing individuals, working software, customer collaboration, and responding to change. It then discusses some characteristics of agile processes like effective communication, drawing customers onto the team, and rapid incremental delivery. The document also summarizes Extreme Programming (XP) and Scrum, two common agile methodologies, outlining their key activities and practices.
A project is a temporary endeavor undertaken to create a unique product or service. Agile project management focuses on iterative development, self-organizing teams, early customer involvement and flexibility. Some key aspects of agile include continuous integration, iterations to develop features in short cycles, and pair programming where two developers work together.
Strengths And Weaknesses Of Software DevelopmentBrianna Johnson
The document discusses an overview for a system development assignment. It outlines the system being developed, requirements, use cases, domain model, and an agile approach to development. The system aims to manage a company's projects and tasks. Key requirements include assigning tasks, tracking progress, and reporting. Example use cases include creating a new project and updating a task. The domain model diagrams the main entities and their relationships. An iterative agile method like Scrum or Kanban is proposed to allow for adaptive planning, early delivery, and incorporating feedback throughout development.
Agile methodology is a project management approach that breaks work into short phases with frequent reassessment. It values individuals, working software, customer collaboration, and response to change over processes, documentation, contracts, and plans. The Agile Manifesto outlines these values. Traditional approaches use waterfall development with sequential phases and no revisiting. Agile is useful when requirements change, development is long-term, and collaboration is needed. Popular aspects of Agile include sprints, Scrum meetings, backlogs, user stories, and frequent deliveries.
Breaking Through the Roadblocks of a New ELM Implementation eBookJason Emanis
The document discusses common roadblocks that can derail an Enterprise Legal Management (ELM) software adoption project and provides best practices for avoiding them. It identifies 8 common roadblocks: 1) allowing a random go-live date to drive the project timeline, 2) failing to understand internal and external inputs, 3) lacking clear leadership and direction, 4) being unwilling to change processes, 5) failing to communicate effectively, 6) selecting the wrong software or implementation partner, 7) not taking ownership of the project after go-live, and 8) failing to consider reporting and data needs. The best practices emphasize understanding requirements before setting timelines, effective communication, selecting trusted advisors, embracing change, and ensuring proper ownership after implementation
Managing Business Analysis for Agile DevelopmentIJMER
This document discusses the impact of agile development methodologies on the role of business analysts. It explains that in agile projects, requirements are defined collaboratively by business analysts, developers, testers and product owners working together incrementally. The business analyst facilitates discussions to help translate user needs into technical requirements. Some new skills required for business analysts in agile include facilitation, coaching and writing user stories. The document also discusses how business analysts can help transition conventional projects to more agile approaches.
Agile software development is a group of software development methods in which requirements and solutions evolve through collaboration between self-organizing, cross-functional teams. It promotes adaptive planning, evolutionary development, early delivery, continuous improvement, and encourages rapid and flexible response to change.
The Agile development model is also a type of Incremental model. Software is developed in incremental, rapid cycles. This results in small incremental releases with each release building on previous functionality. Each release is thoroughly tested to ensure software quality is maintained. It is used for time critical applications.
The document provides an overview of agile software development methods. It discusses topics like agile vs plan-driven development, extreme programming, the agile manifesto and principles. Extreme programming is described as taking an extreme approach to iterative development with new versions built several times per day and increments delivered every 2 weeks. Key practices of XP like incremental planning, small releases, test-first development, pair programming and continuous integration are also summarized.
The agile alliance has stated in their manifestoGlen Alleman
The Agile Alliance has stated in their manifesto, principles by which a process would be considered agile. These principles provide useful guidelines for evaluating a spe-cific process as to its suitability to be considered agile. Like previous manifestos there is some sense of political challenge to the establishment.
Agile software development methods focus on iterative development, customer collaboration, and rapid delivery of working software. The agile manifesto values individuals, interactions, working software, and responding to change over processes, tools, documentation, and following a plan. Common agile principles include customer involvement, incremental delivery, valuing people over processes, and embracing change. While agile methods are well-suited for small teams and changing requirements, challenges include maintaining customer interest, scaling to large projects, and prioritizing changes with multiple stakeholders. Both plan-driven and agile approaches have tradeoffs depending on project size, lifetime, technologies used, and organizational culture.
This document provides an overview of a software implementation project. The project aims to implement new software at a company to increase productivity and update security and hardware. The project will use agile methodology over approximately 100 days with a budget of $250,000. The document outlines the project plan, including the communication plan, risk management plan, procurement plan, and stakeholder register. It discusses both the potential positive and negative impacts of video games on adolescents.
The document discusses scrum and agile frameworks. It provides information on scrum roles and ceremonies like stand-ups, planning, reviews and retrospectives. It also discusses metrics like velocity and burn down/up charts. The document reviews participants' past project experiences and has them identify success and failure factors. It aligns these factors to scrum roles and ceremonies. It also discusses aligning with the values in the Agile Manifesto and whether participants currently practice these values.
The document discusses integrating user experience (UX) design into an Agile/SCRUM development process. It outlines some key Agile values and principles, such as prioritizing customer satisfaction, welcoming changing requirements, and delivering working software frequently. It notes some common pain points that both UX and Agile aim to address, such as impossible estimates, missed deadlines, unusable software, and frustrated users. Finally, it provides some guidelines for integrating UX into Agile, such as researching first, designing second, collaborating closely across teams, and prioritizing features based on user needs, business goals, and technical feasibility.
The document discusses agile process models and principles. It defines agility as effective response to change through communication among team members and customers. Key aspects of agility include incremental delivery, emphasis on working software over documentation, and adapting to changes. The principles promote satisfying customers, embracing changing requirements, frequent delivery, collaboration between business and development, trust in motivated individuals, and continuous improvement.
Climate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing DaysKari Kakkonen
My slides at Nordic Testing Days 6.6.2024
Climate impact / sustainability of software testing discussed on the talk. ICT and testing must carry their part of global responsibility to help with the climat warming. We can minimize the carbon footprint but we can also have a carbon handprint, a positive impact on the climate. Quality characteristics can be added with sustainability, and then measured continuously. Test environments can be used less, and in smaller scale and on demand. Test techniques can be used in optimizing or minimizing number of tests. Test automation can be used to speed up testing.
Full-RAG: A modern architecture for hyper-personalizationZilliz
Mike Del Balso, CEO & Co-Founder at Tecton, presents "Full RAG," a novel approach to AI recommendation systems, aiming to push beyond the limitations of traditional models through a deep integration of contextual insights and real-time data, leveraging the Retrieval-Augmented Generation architecture. This talk will outline Full RAG's potential to significantly enhance personalization, address engineering challenges such as data management and model training, and introduce data enrichment with reranking as a key solution. Attendees will gain crucial insights into the importance of hyperpersonalization in AI, the capabilities of Full RAG for advanced personalization, and strategies for managing complex data integrations for deploying cutting-edge AI solutions.
Maruthi Prithivirajan, Head of ASEAN & IN Solution Architecture, Neo4j
Get an inside look at the latest Neo4j innovations that enable relationship-driven intelligence at scale. Learn more about the newest cloud integrations and product enhancements that make Neo4j an essential choice for developers building apps with interconnected data and generative AI.
In the rapidly evolving landscape of technologies, XML continues to play a vital role in structuring, storing, and transporting data across diverse systems. The recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) present new methodologies for enhancing XML development workflows, introducing efficiency, automation, and intelligent capabilities. This presentation will outline the scope and perspective of utilizing AI in XML development. The potential benefits and the possible pitfalls will be highlighted, providing a balanced view of the subject.
We will explore the capabilities of AI in understanding XML markup languages and autonomously creating structured XML content. Additionally, we will examine the capacity of AI to enrich plain text with appropriate XML markup. Practical examples and methodological guidelines will be provided to elucidate how AI can be effectively prompted to interpret and generate accurate XML markup.
Further emphasis will be placed on the role of AI in developing XSLT, or schemas such as XSD and Schematron. We will address the techniques and strategies adopted to create prompts for generating code, explaining code, or refactoring the code, and the results achieved.
The discussion will extend to how AI can be used to transform XML content. In particular, the focus will be on the use of AI XPath extension functions in XSLT, Schematron, Schematron Quick Fixes, or for XML content refactoring.
The presentation aims to deliver a comprehensive overview of AI usage in XML development, providing attendees with the necessary knowledge to make informed decisions. Whether you’re at the early stages of adopting AI or considering integrating it in advanced XML development, this presentation will cover all levels of expertise.
By highlighting the potential advantages and challenges of integrating AI with XML development tools and languages, the presentation seeks to inspire thoughtful conversation around the future of XML development. We’ll not only delve into the technical aspects of AI-powered XML development but also discuss practical implications and possible future directions.
Driving Business Innovation: Latest Generative AI Advancements & Success StorySafe Software
Are you ready to revolutionize how you handle data? Join us for a webinar where we’ll bring you up to speed with the latest advancements in Generative AI technology and discover how leveraging FME with tools from giants like Google Gemini, Amazon, and Microsoft OpenAI can supercharge your workflow efficiency.
During the hour, we’ll take you through:
Guest Speaker Segment with Hannah Barrington: Dive into the world of dynamic real estate marketing with Hannah, the Marketing Manager at Workspace Group. Hear firsthand how their team generates engaging descriptions for thousands of office units by integrating diverse data sources—from PDF floorplans to web pages—using FME transformers, like OpenAIVisionConnector and AnthropicVisionConnector. This use case will show you how GenAI can streamline content creation for marketing across the board.
Ollama Use Case: Learn how Scenario Specialist Dmitri Bagh has utilized Ollama within FME to input data, create custom models, and enhance security protocols. This segment will include demos to illustrate the full capabilities of FME in AI-driven processes.
Custom AI Models: Discover how to leverage FME to build personalized AI models using your data. Whether it’s populating a model with local data for added security or integrating public AI tools, find out how FME facilitates a versatile and secure approach to AI.
We’ll wrap up with a live Q&A session where you can engage with our experts on your specific use cases, and learn more about optimizing your data workflows with AI.
This webinar is ideal for professionals seeking to harness the power of AI within their data management systems while ensuring high levels of customization and security. Whether you're a novice or an expert, gain actionable insights and strategies to elevate your data processes. Join us to see how FME and AI can revolutionize how you work with data!
GraphRAG for Life Science to increase LLM accuracyTomaz Bratanic
GraphRAG for life science domain, where you retriever information from biomedical knowledge graphs using LLMs to increase the accuracy and performance of generated answers
Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...SOFTTECHHUB
The choice of an operating system plays a pivotal role in shaping our computing experience. For decades, Microsoft's Windows has dominated the market, offering a familiar and widely adopted platform for personal and professional use. However, as technological advancements continue to push the boundaries of innovation, alternative operating systems have emerged, challenging the status quo and offering users a fresh perspective on computing.
One such alternative that has garnered significant attention and acclaim is Nitrux Linux 3.5.0, a sleek, powerful, and user-friendly Linux distribution that promises to redefine the way we interact with our devices. With its focus on performance, security, and customization, Nitrux Linux presents a compelling case for those seeking to break free from the constraints of proprietary software and embrace the freedom and flexibility of open-source computing.
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1DianaGray10
This session provides introduction to UiPath Communication Mining, importance and platform overview. You will acquire a good understand of the phases in Communication Mining as we go over the platform with you. Topics covered:
• Communication Mining Overview
• Why is it important?
• How can it help today’s business and the benefits
• Phases in Communication Mining
• Demo on Platform overview
• Q/A
Programming Foundation Models with DSPy - Meetup SlidesZilliz
Prompting language models is hard, while programming language models is easy. In this talk, I will discuss the state-of-the-art framework DSPy for programming foundation models with its powerful optimizers and runtime constraint system.
Building Production Ready Search Pipelines with Spark and MilvusZilliz
Spark is the widely used ETL tool for processing, indexing and ingesting data to serving stack for search. Milvus is the production-ready open-source vector database. In this talk we will show how to use Spark to process unstructured data to extract vector representations, and push the vectors to Milvus vector database for search serving.
GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...Neo4j
Leonard Jayamohan, Partner & Generative AI Lead, Deloitte
This keynote will reveal how Deloitte leverages Neo4j’s graph power for groundbreaking digital twin solutions, achieving a staggering 100x performance boost. Discover the essential role knowledge graphs play in successful generative AI implementations. Plus, get an exclusive look at an innovative Neo4j + Generative AI solution Deloitte is developing in-house.
TrustArc Webinar - 2024 Global Privacy SurveyTrustArc
How does your privacy program stack up against your peers? What challenges are privacy teams tackling and prioritizing in 2024?
In the fifth annual Global Privacy Benchmarks Survey, we asked over 1,800 global privacy professionals and business executives to share their perspectives on the current state of privacy inside and outside of their organizations. This year’s report focused on emerging areas of importance for privacy and compliance professionals, including considerations and implications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies, building brand trust, and different approaches for achieving higher privacy competence scores.
See how organizational priorities and strategic approaches to data security and privacy are evolving around the globe.
This webinar will review:
- The top 10 privacy insights from the fifth annual Global Privacy Benchmarks Survey
- The top challenges for privacy leaders, practitioners, and organizations in 2024
- Key themes to consider in developing and maintaining your privacy program
Unlocking Productivity: Leveraging the Potential of Copilot in Microsoft 365, a presentation by Christoforos Vlachos, Senior Solutions Manager – Modern Workplace, Uni Systems
For the full video of this presentation, please visit: https://www.edge-ai-vision.com/2024/06/building-and-scaling-ai-applications-with-the-nx-ai-manager-a-presentation-from-network-optix/
Robin van Emden, Senior Director of Data Science at Network Optix, presents the “Building and Scaling AI Applications with the Nx AI Manager,” tutorial at the May 2024 Embedded Vision Summit.
In this presentation, van Emden covers the basics of scaling edge AI solutions using the Nx tool kit. He emphasizes the process of developing AI models and deploying them globally. He also showcases the conversion of AI models and the creation of effective edge AI pipelines, with a focus on pre-processing, model conversion, selecting the appropriate inference engine for the target hardware and post-processing.
van Emden shows how Nx can simplify the developer’s life and facilitate a rapid transition from concept to production-ready applications.He provides valuable insights into developing scalable and efficient edge AI solutions, with a strong focus on practical implementation.
Cosa hanno in comune un mattoncino Lego e la backdoor XZ?Speck&Tech
ABSTRACT: A prima vista, un mattoncino Lego e la backdoor XZ potrebbero avere in comune il fatto di essere entrambi blocchi di costruzione, o dipendenze di progetti creativi e software. La realtà è che un mattoncino Lego e il caso della backdoor XZ hanno molto di più di tutto ciò in comune.
Partecipate alla presentazione per immergervi in una storia di interoperabilità, standard e formati aperti, per poi discutere del ruolo importante che i contributori hanno in una comunità open source sostenibile.
BIO: Sostenitrice del software libero e dei formati standard e aperti. È stata un membro attivo dei progetti Fedora e openSUSE e ha co-fondato l'Associazione LibreItalia dove è stata coinvolta in diversi eventi, migrazioni e formazione relativi a LibreOffice. In precedenza ha lavorato a migrazioni e corsi di formazione su LibreOffice per diverse amministrazioni pubbliche e privati. Da gennaio 2020 lavora in SUSE come Software Release Engineer per Uyuni e SUSE Manager e quando non segue la sua passione per i computer e per Geeko coltiva la sua curiosità per l'astronomia (da cui deriva il suo nickname deneb_alpha).
Cosa hanno in comune un mattoncino Lego e la backdoor XZ?
Agile software development
1.
2. Agile software development is a group of software development
methods based on iterative and incremental development, where
requirements and solutions evolve through collaboration between self-
organizing, cross-functional teams.
It promotes adaptive planning, evolutionary development and delivery,
a time-boxed iterative approach, and encourages rapid and flexible
response to change.
It is a conceptual framework that promotes foreseen interactions throughout
the development cycle.
The Agile Manifesto[ introduced the term in 2001. (Wiki, 21 Aug 12)
3. A software development methodology or system
development methodology in software
engineering is a framework that is used to
structure, plan, and control the process of
developing an information system.
4. Software Engineering (WIKI) (SE) is the application of a systematic,
disciplined, quantifiable approach to the design, development, operation,
and maintenance of software, and the study of these approaches; that is,
the application of engineering to software.
Software Development, a much used and more generic term, does not
necessarily subsume the engineering paradigm.
› The field's future looks bright according to Money Magazine and
Salary.com, which rated "software engineer" as the best job in the
United States in 2006.
› In 2012, software engineering was again ranked as the best job in the
United States, this time by CareerCast.com.
5. An information system (IS) - is any combination of information technology
and people's activities that support operations, management and decision
making.
In a very broad sense, the term information system is frequently used to
refer to the interaction between people, processes, data and technology.
In this sense, the term is used to refer
› not only to the information and communication technology (ICT) that
an organization uses,
› but also to the way in which people interact with this technology in
support of business processes. (Wiki)
6. Iterative and Incremental development is at the heart of a cyclic
software development process developed in response to the
weaknesses of the waterfall model.
It starts with an initial planning and ends with deployment with the cyclic
interactions in between.
Iterative and incremental development are essential parts of the
Rational Unified Process, Extreme Programming and generally the
various agile software development frameworks.
It follows a similar process to the “plan-do-check-act” cycle of business
process improvement.
7. In time management, a time box allots
a fixed period of time for an activity.
Time boxing plans activity by allocating
time boxes.
8. Fears regarding software development led to a number
of pioneers / industry experts to develop the Agile
Manifesto based up some firm values and principles.
Practitioners had become afraid that repeated software
failures could not be stopped without some kind of
guiding process to guide development activities.
9. Practitioners were afraid that
› The project will produce the wrong product
› The project will produce a product of inferior quality
› The project will be late
› We’ll have to work 80 hour weeks
› We’ll have to break commitments
› We won’t be having fun.
10. These individuals, called The Agile Alliance, were thus motivated to constrain activities such
that certain outputs and artifacts are predictably produced.
Based on their experiences around 2000, these notables got together to address common
development problems.
It was their goal to outline the values and principles that would allow software teams to develop
quickly and respond to change.
These activities arose in large part to runaway processes.
› Failure to achieve certain goals was met with ‘more process.’ Schedules slipped; budgets
bloated, and processes became even larger.
The Alliance (17) created a statement of values, which has been termed the manifesto of the
Agile Alliance.
They then developed the 12 Principles of Agility.
11. “We are uncovering better ways of developing software by doing it and helping
others do it. Through this work we have come to the value:
1. Individuals and interactions over processes and tools
2. Working software over comprehensive documentation
3. Customer collaboration over contract negotiation
4. Responding to change over following a plan
That is, while there is value in the items on the right, we value the items on the left
more.”
Let’s look at these values to discern exactly what is meant.
12. Strong players are a must, but strong players can fail if they don’t work together.
Strong player: not necessarily an ‘ace;’ working well with others! Communication
and interacting is more important than raw talent.
The ‘right’ tools are vital to smooth functioning of a team.
Start small. Find a free tool and use until you can demo you’ve outgrown it. Don’t
assume bigger is better. Start with white board; flat files before going to a huge
database.
Building a team is more important than building the environment.
Some managers build the environment and expect the team to fall together. Doesn’t
work. Let the team build the environment on the basis of need.
13. Code – not ideal medium for communicating rationale and system structure. Team needs to produce
human readable documents describing system and design decision rationale.
Too much documentation is worse than too little.
› Take time; more to keep in sync with code; Not kept in sync? It is a lie and misleading.
Short rationale and structure document.
› Keep this in sync; Only highest level structure in the system kept.
How to train newbees if short & sweet?
› Work closely with them.
› Transfer knowledge by sitting with them; make part of team via close training and interaction
Two essential docs for transferring info to new team members: code and team.
› Code is the only unambiguous source of information.
› Team holds every-changing roadmap of systems in their heads; cannot put on paper.
› Best way to transfer info- interact with them.
Fatal flaw: Pursue documentation instead of software:
Rule: Produce no document unless its need is immediate and significant.
14. Not possible to describe software requirements up front and leave
someone else to develop it within cost and on time.
Customers cannot just cite needs and go away
Successful projects require customer feedback on a regular and
frequent basis – and not dependent upon a contract or SOW.
› Customer must work closely with development team for feedback
on team’s efforts.
15. Best contracts are NOT those specifying requirements, schedule and cost.
› Become meaningless shortly.
› Far better are contracts that govern the way the development team and
customer will work together.
› Details ideally not specified in contract. Rather contracts could pay when a
block passed customer’s acceptance tests.
Details of the acceptance tests were not specified in the contract.
With frequent deliverables and feedback, acceptance tests never an issue.
Typically major changes common; whole blocks of functionality removed;
others inserted.
Key was intense collaboration with the customer and a contract that
governed that collaboration rather than specifying the details of scope and
schedule for a fixed cost.
16. Our plans and the ability to respond to changes is critical!
Course of a project cannot be predicted far into the future.
› Too many variables; not many good ways at estimating cost.
Tempting to create a PERT or Gnant chart for whole project.
› This does Not give novice managers control.
› Can track individual tasks, compare to actual dates w/planned dates and
react to discrepancies.
› But the structure of the chart will downgrade
› As developers gain knowledge of the system and as customer gains
knowledge about their needs, some tasks will become unnecessary;
others will be discovered and will be added to ‘the list.’
› In short, the plan will undergo changes in shape, not just dates.
17. Better planning strategy – make detailed plans for the next few weeks, very
rough plans for the next few months, and extremely crude plans beyond
that.
Need to know what we will be working on the next few weeks; roughly for
the next few months; a vague idea what system will do after a year.
So, we are only investing in a detailed plan for immediate tasks; once plan
is made, difficult to change due to momentum and commitment.
› But rest of plan remains flexible. The lower resolution parts of the plan
can be changed with relative ease.
19. Research has indicated that a number of practices have significant impact upon
quality of final system:
A strong correlation between quality and early delivery of a partially functioning
system.
› The less functional the initial delivery, the higher the quality of the final delivery.
Another strong correlation exists between final quality and frequently deliveries of
increasing functionality.
› The more frequent the deliveries, the higher the final quality.
Agile processes deliver early and often. Rudimentary system first followed by
systems of increasing functionality every few weeks.
› Customers my use these systems in production, or
› May choose to review existing functionality and report on changes to be made.
20. This is a statement of attitude. The participants in an agile process are not
afraid of change.
› View changes to the requirements as good things, because they mean
that the team has learned more about what it will take to satisfy the
market.
An agile team works very hard to keep the structure of their software
flexible, so that when requirements change, the impact to the system is
minimal.
Moreso, the principles of object oriented design help us to maintain this
kind of flexibility.
21. We deliver working software.
› Deliver early and often.
› Be not content with delivering bundles of documents, or plans.
› Don’t count those as true deliverables.
The goal of delivering software that satisfies the customer’s needs.
22. In order for a project to be agile, there must be
significant and frequent interaction between the
customers, developers, and stakeholders.
An agile project is not like a fire-and-forget
weapon.
An agile project must be continuously guided.
23. An agile project is one in which people are considered the most important
factor of success.
› All other factors, process, environment, management, etc., are
considered to be second order effects, and are subject to change if
they are having an adverse effect upon the people.
For example, if the office environment is an obstacle to the team, the office
environment changes.
If certain process steps are an obstacle to the team, the process steps
change.
24. In an agile project, please talk to each other.
› The primary mode of communication is conversation.
› Documents may be created, but there is no attempt to capture
all project information in writing.
An agile project team does not demand written specs, written
plans, or written designs.
› They may create them if they perceive an immediate and
significant need, but they are not the default.
› The default is conversation.
25. Agile projects measure their progress by measuring the
amount of software that is working.
› They don’t measure their progress in terms of the
phase that they are in, or by the volume of
documentation that has been produced, or by the
amount of infrastructure code they have created.
They are 30% done when 30% of the necessary
functionality is working.
26. An agile project is not run like a 50 yard dash; it is run like a marathon.
› The team does not take off at full speed and try to maintain that speed for
the duration.
› Rather they run at a fast, but sustainable, pace.
Running too fast leads to burnout, shortcuts, and debacle.
Agile teams pace themselves.
› They don’t allow themselves to get too tired.
› They don’t borrow tomorrow’s energy to get a bit more done today.
› They work at a rate that allows them to maintain the highest quality
standards for the duration of the project.
27. High quality is the key to high speed.
› The way to go fast is to keep the software as clean and robust as
possible.
› Thus, all agile team-members are committed to producing only the
highest quality code they can.
› They do not make messes and then tell themselves they’ll clean it up
when they have more time.
If they make a mess, they clean it up before they finish for the day.
28. Agile teams do not try to build the grand system in the sky.
› Rather they always take the simplest path that is consistent with
their goals.
› They don’t anticipate tomorrow’s problems and try to defend
against them today.
› Rather they do the simplest and highest quality work today,
confident that it will be easy to change if and when tomorrows
problems arise.
29. An agile team is a self organizing team.
› Responsibilities are not handed to individual team members from the
outside. Responsibilities are communicated to the team as a whole, and
the team determines the best way to fulfill them.
Agile team members work together on all aspects of the project.
› Each is allowed input into the whole.
› No single team member is responsible for the architecture, or the
requirements, or the tests, etc.
› The team shares those responsibilities and each team member has
influence over them.
30. An agile team continually adjusts its organization, rules,
conventions, relationships, etc.
An agile team knows that its environment is
continuously changing, and knows that they must
change with that environment to remain agile.
31. The professional goal of every software engineer, and every development team, is to
deliver the highest possible value to our employers and customers.
› And yet, our projects fail, or fail to deliver value, at a dismaying rate.
Though well intentioned, the upward spiral of process inflation is culpable for at least
some of this failure.
The principles and values of agile software development were formed as a way to help
teams break the cycle of process inflation, and to focus on simple techniques for reaching
their goals.
At the time of this writing there were many agile processes to choose from. These include
› SCRUM,
› Crystal,
› Feature Driven Development,
› Adaptive Software Development (ADP), and most significantly,
› Extreme Programming.