HEALTH BASKET UPDATE
PROCESS – PERSPECTIVES
FROM ISRAEL
MR VADIM PERMAN
MINISTRY OF HEALTH
What is the scope of the National List of
Health Services (NLHS) ?
The NLHS includes:
- over 3000 pharmaceuticals
- approx. 1,100 other technologies
The Cost of NLHS –
NIS 48 billion
Israeli Pharmaceutical market -
approx 8-9 billion (NIS)
Technologic addition to the health basket (millions
of NIS)
Technologic addition to the health basket out of total
health basket
Source: Ministry of Health data; Pharma Israel analysis. Data in graph is based on the Basket Committee available data, and excludes additional
24m NIS in 2015 (total 2015 - 324m NIS), additional 15m NIS in 2009 (total 2009 – 416m NIS), additional 60m NIS due to third addition to the
health basket (total 2008 - 510m NIS). Data also excludes budget allocated to dental care for children and elderly.
The scarcity problem: technologies rated A8-A9 and A9 vs.
budget for addition to the Health Basket
Source: Pharma Israel analysis
Economic
Evaluation
Pricing, CUA,
CEA
Epidemiological
Evaluation
Needs Assessment
& target
population
Social
Ethical
Political
Legal
Comprehensive
evaluation
National Policy
in healthcare
technology
Legislation
Clinical
Evaluation
Medical assessment
safety, efficacy
Updating the National Health Basket
Aspects
UPDATING THE NLHS - STEPS
submissions of applications to the MTIA
March
January
March-July
July-October
October-December
• Safety, efficiency,
literature review
• benefit, epidemiologic
assessment
• Sub-committee
• National Councils
• Medical organizations
Director-General’s Directive on
submission of technologies for the NLHS
Technology assessment of said
submissions
integration of information
National Public Committee
Public committee – decision making
18 members:
Chairperson
the director of the MTIA
4 Physicians
4 Economists
4 Health Funds
4 Public representatives from
the fields of medical sciences, ethics, social sciences and
welfare.
COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT
Comparison
to alternative
treatment
options
evidence-based
medicine - efficacy
Economic
evaluation
Identification
of specific
patient groups
Incidence,
Prevalence,
Morbidity &
Mortality
SafetyRegulatory
status in Israel
and abroad
Relevant
clinical
guidelines
Public
funding
10
KEY ELEMENTS IN TECHNOLOGY
INCLUSION
Budget Impact
Professional
associations
recommendation
DILEMMAS FROM THE PUBLIC
COMMITTEE
MUCH FOR A FEW LESS FOR MANY.
WHAT IS THE DEFINITION OF A “LIFE SAVING TECHNOLOGY”?
URGENT HEALTH NEEDS VS. INVESTMENT IN FUTURE HEALTH (PREVENTION).
WHAT SHOULD BE THE STANDPOINT OF THE COMMITTEE (HEALTH SECTOR VS.
OVERALL NATIONAL CONSIDERATIONS) ?
INCLUSION IN THE NLHS FOR A LIMITED PERIOD OF TIME.
SHOULD THE COMMITTEE LIMIT RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE BUDGET
ALLOCATED OR HIGHLIGHT HEALTH NEEDS ?
RISING COST OF TECHNOLOGIES – WHAT CAN
BE DONE ?
• PRICE NEGOTIATIONS
• DEFINING SPECIFIC PATIENT GROUPS WHO BENEFIT THE
MOST FROM SAID TECHNOLOGY
• LIMITATIONS – LINE OF THERAPY, CLINICAL
CHARACTERISTICS
• CLASS EFFECT
• PERFORMANCE BASED RISK SHARING SCHEMES
• CAPPING AGREEMENTS
In conclusion:
 Israel has created a uniform nomenclature, definitions and
methodology for HTA under governmental leadership.
 The mechanism is both feasible and practical for the needs of the
Israeli healthcare system and involves all stakeholders.
There is a direct link between HTA, Decision making and Budget
allocation.
The process is highly accepted by the health system, judicial
system, political system and the general public.
Thank you for your attention

Advanced technologies and budgetary implications -- Vadim Perman, Israel

  • 1.
    HEALTH BASKET UPDATE PROCESS– PERSPECTIVES FROM ISRAEL MR VADIM PERMAN MINISTRY OF HEALTH
  • 2.
    What is thescope of the National List of Health Services (NLHS) ? The NLHS includes: - over 3000 pharmaceuticals - approx. 1,100 other technologies The Cost of NLHS – NIS 48 billion Israeli Pharmaceutical market - approx 8-9 billion (NIS)
  • 3.
    Technologic addition tothe health basket (millions of NIS)
  • 4.
    Technologic addition tothe health basket out of total health basket Source: Ministry of Health data; Pharma Israel analysis. Data in graph is based on the Basket Committee available data, and excludes additional 24m NIS in 2015 (total 2015 - 324m NIS), additional 15m NIS in 2009 (total 2009 – 416m NIS), additional 60m NIS due to third addition to the health basket (total 2008 - 510m NIS). Data also excludes budget allocated to dental care for children and elderly.
  • 5.
    The scarcity problem:technologies rated A8-A9 and A9 vs. budget for addition to the Health Basket Source: Pharma Israel analysis
  • 6.
    Economic Evaluation Pricing, CUA, CEA Epidemiological Evaluation Needs Assessment &target population Social Ethical Political Legal Comprehensive evaluation National Policy in healthcare technology Legislation Clinical Evaluation Medical assessment safety, efficacy Updating the National Health Basket Aspects
  • 7.
    UPDATING THE NLHS- STEPS submissions of applications to the MTIA March January March-July July-October October-December • Safety, efficiency, literature review • benefit, epidemiologic assessment • Sub-committee • National Councils • Medical organizations Director-General’s Directive on submission of technologies for the NLHS Technology assessment of said submissions integration of information National Public Committee
  • 8.
    Public committee –decision making 18 members: Chairperson the director of the MTIA 4 Physicians 4 Economists 4 Health Funds 4 Public representatives from the fields of medical sciences, ethics, social sciences and welfare.
  • 9.
    COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT Comparison to alternative treatment options evidence-based medicine- efficacy Economic evaluation Identification of specific patient groups Incidence, Prevalence, Morbidity & Mortality SafetyRegulatory status in Israel and abroad Relevant clinical guidelines Public funding
  • 10.
    10 KEY ELEMENTS INTECHNOLOGY INCLUSION Budget Impact Professional associations recommendation
  • 11.
    DILEMMAS FROM THEPUBLIC COMMITTEE MUCH FOR A FEW LESS FOR MANY. WHAT IS THE DEFINITION OF A “LIFE SAVING TECHNOLOGY”? URGENT HEALTH NEEDS VS. INVESTMENT IN FUTURE HEALTH (PREVENTION). WHAT SHOULD BE THE STANDPOINT OF THE COMMITTEE (HEALTH SECTOR VS. OVERALL NATIONAL CONSIDERATIONS) ? INCLUSION IN THE NLHS FOR A LIMITED PERIOD OF TIME. SHOULD THE COMMITTEE LIMIT RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE BUDGET ALLOCATED OR HIGHLIGHT HEALTH NEEDS ?
  • 12.
    RISING COST OFTECHNOLOGIES – WHAT CAN BE DONE ? • PRICE NEGOTIATIONS • DEFINING SPECIFIC PATIENT GROUPS WHO BENEFIT THE MOST FROM SAID TECHNOLOGY • LIMITATIONS – LINE OF THERAPY, CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS • CLASS EFFECT • PERFORMANCE BASED RISK SHARING SCHEMES • CAPPING AGREEMENTS
  • 13.
    In conclusion:  Israelhas created a uniform nomenclature, definitions and methodology for HTA under governmental leadership.  The mechanism is both feasible and practical for the needs of the Israeli healthcare system and involves all stakeholders. There is a direct link between HTA, Decision making and Budget allocation. The process is highly accepted by the health system, judicial system, political system and the general public.
  • 14.
    Thank you foryour attention