The document outlines knowledge and practice behaviors for advanced clinical social work practice organized under the 10 CSWE competencies. It defines clinical social work as building on social work values and methods to restore and enhance client well-being through multidimensional assessment, diagnosis, and evidence-based treatment methods like psychotherapy. Key aspects include developing therapeutic relationships, understanding client strengths and environment, and using professional self-reflection and supervision. The goal is to provide a framework for clinical social work concentrations under the 2008 CSWE standards.
Results from student-facilitated roundtable discussions at PACE Great Streets townhall meeting in Memphis, TN. This project represents an experiential learning activity at The University of Memphis, Health Promotion concentration in the Department of Health and Sport Sciences.
Results from student-facilitated roundtable discussions at PACE Great Streets townhall meeting in Memphis, TN. This project represents an experiential learning activity at The University of Memphis, Health Promotion concentration in the Department of Health and Sport Sciences.
Health Psychology: Clinical Supervision Course 3 Part Series Michael Changaris
Supervision is a vital skill for psychologists and particularly health psychologists. To this end, IHPTP offers a supervision training track to ensure that graduates of the program can make powerful and lasting contributions to the field of psychology as a whole and health psychology.
Training in methods of supervision is sequential, cumulative, and graded in complexity. In the month-long orientation, interns are provided an introduction to the program's provision of supervision. This training includes expectations, roles, supervisor availability, types of supervision (in vivo, individual, group), the structure of supervision, how to use supervision effectively, and ethical and legal responsibilities. Interns will develop skills in how to fill out and use the required California Board of Psychology forms.
Interns will attend three yearly seminars that cover key domains of supervision, including legal and ethics overview, key supervision competencies, guidelines, relationships, professionalism, diversity, evaluation and feedback, and management of supervisees who do not meet performance competency standards. The seminars allow for discussion of previous supervision experiences and self-assessment about areas of needed development and supervision in the integrated health setting.
WORKING WITH COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKERS AS ‘VOLUNTEERS’IN A VA.docxdunnramage
WORKING WITH COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKERS AS ‘VOLUNTEERS’
IN A VACCINE TRIAL: PRACTICAL AND ETHICAL EXPERIENCES
AND IMPLICATIONS
VIBIAN ANGWENYI, DORCAS KAMUYA, DOROTHY MWACHIRO, VICKI MARSH,
PATRICIA NJUGUNA AND SASSY MOLYNEUX
Keywords
developing world bioethics,
research ethics,
informed consent,
clinical trials,
sub-Saharan Africa
ABSTRACT
Community engagement is increasingly emphasized in biomedical research,
as a right in itself, and to strengthen ethical practice. We draw on interviews
and observations to consider the practical and ethical implications of involv-
ing Community Health Workers (CHWs) as part of a community engagement
strategy for a vaccine trial on the Kenyan Coast. CHWs were initially engaged
as an important network to be informed about the trial. However over time,
and in response to community advice, they became involved in trial informa-
tion sharing and identifying potential participants; thereby taking on roles that
overlapped with those of employed fieldworkers (FWs). While CHWs involve-
ment was generally perceived as positive and appreciated, there were chal-
lenges in their relations with FWs and other community members, partly
related to levels and forms of remuneration. Specifically, payment of CHWs
was not as high as for FWs and was based on ‘performance’. This extrinsic
motivation had the potential to crowd out CHWs intrinsic motivation to
perform their pre-existing community roles. CHWs remuneration potentially
also contributed to CHWs distorting trial information to encourage community
members to participate; and to researchers encouraging CHWs to utilize their
social connections and status to increase the numbers of people who
attended information giving sessions. Individual consent processes were
protected in this trial through final information sharing and consent being
conducted by trained clinical staff who were not embedded in study commu-
nities. However, our experiences suggest that roles and remuneration of all
front line staff and volunteers involved in trials need careful consideration
from the outset, and monitoring and discussion over time.
BACKGROUND
Community engagement is increasingly emphasized as
central to biomedical research in international settings,
both as a right in itself, and as a means to uphold ethical
principles, enhance protection and benefits, create legiti-
macy, share responsibility between researchers and com-
munities, and strengthen science.1 Communities can
potentially be involved in a broad range of research activi-
ties, from protocol development, to research conduct,
reviewing access to data and samples, and dissemination
or publication of research findings. Community members
are also often employed in research studies to simultane-
ously recruit, and conduct research processes such as
interviews and simple study procedures. Less commonly
community members may also recruit participants as part
1 E. Emanuel, et al. What makes clinical research in developing coun-
t.
Ethical principles in research- the set of standards and principle.docxSANSKAR20
Ethical principles in research- the set of standards and principles used to determine appropriate and acceptable research conduct.
General Principles
The following General Principles are aspirational and serve as a guide for sociologists in determining ethical courses of action in various contexts. They exemplify the highest ideals of professional conduct.
Principle A: Professional Competence
Sociologists strive to maintain the highest levels of competence in their work; they recognize the limitations of their expertise; and they under take only those tasks for which they are qualified by education, training, or experience. They recognize the need for on going education in order to remain professionally competent; and they utilize the appropriate scientific, professional, technical, and administrative resources needed to ensure competence in their professional activities. They consult with other professionals when necessary for the benefit of their students, research participants, and clients.
Principle B: Integrity
Sociologists are honest, fair, and respectful of others in their professional activities in research, teaching, practice, and service. Sociologists do not knowingly act in ways that jeopardize either their own or others’ professional welfare. Sociologists conduct their affairs in ways that inspire trust and confidence; they do not knowingly make statements that are false, misleading, or deceptive.
Principle C: Professional and Scientific Responsibility
Sociologists adhere to the highest scientific and professional standards and accept responsibility for their work. Sociologists understand that they form a community and show respect for other sociologists even when they disagree on theoretical, methodological, or personal approaches to professional activities. Sociologists value the public trust in sociology and are concerned about their ethical behavior and that of other sociologists that might compromise that trust. While endeavoring always to be collegial, sociologists must never let the desire to be collegial outweigh their shared responsibility for ethical behavior. When appropriate, they consult with colleagues in order to prevent or avoid unethical conduct.
Principle D:Respect for People’s Rights, Dignity, and Diversity
Sociologists respect the rights, dignity, and worth of all people. They strive to eliminate bias in their professional activities, and they do not tolerate any forms of discrimination based on age; gender; race; ethnicity; national origin; religion; sexual orientation; disability; health conditions; or marital, domestic, or parental status. They are sensitive to cultural, individual, and role differences in serving, teaching, and studying groups of people with distinctive characteristics. In all of their workrelated activities, sociologists acknowledge the rights of others to hold values, attitudes, and opinions that differ from their own.
Principle E: Social Responsibility
Sociologists are aware of ...
EthicsThe Ethical Use of Social Media in Marriageand Fam.docxhumphrieskalyn
Ethics
The Ethical Use of Social Media in Marriage
and Family Therapy: Recommendations
and Future Directions
Nickolas A. Jordan
1
, Lindy Russell
1
, Elnaz Afousi
2
, Tasha Chemel
2
,
Melissa McVicker
2
, Janet Robertson
2
, and John Winek
1
Abstract
Increasingly, people spend time online, communicating via e-mail, websites, instant messages, and various social media platforms
that incorporate text, video, and online photo albums. Social media have altered the way people spend their time and commu-
nicate with each other; this includes mental health professionals. It is imperative that therapists are knowledgeable about the ways
social media affects clients’ personal interactions as well as the ethical implications of their own professional use of social media.
Professional organizations do not provide adequate ethical guidelines for therapeutic practice regarding social media; therefore,
ethical codes should be adjusted to include the new media as they arise. After reviewing related literature from other mental
health disciplines, the authors offer recommendations to be integrated into the professional ethical codes for mental health pro-
fessionals to ensure the ethical use of social media in therapy. The authors organize their recommendations around several key
principles from various mental health codes of ethics.
Keywords
ethics, marriage and family therapy, social media, online, confidentiality, professional competence, responsibility to clients
Social media such as Facebook, Twitter, eHarmony, and
MySpace have come to dominate popular culture. People have
access to friends and family through social media virtually at
all times. Whether at home on the desktop computer, in the
library with a laptop, or on the go with a smart phone, friends,
‘‘fans,’’ and ‘‘followers’’ are never more than a few clicks
away. For the purposes of this work, social media—sometimes
referred to as social networks—are defined as Internet-based
applications used in direct and indirect social interactions.
Social media have become entrenched in how many people
communicate with one another. It has even been argued that the
order of relationship development has changed (Palfrey & Gas-
ser, 2008). In the past, it would have been necessary to engage
in some sort of conversation in order to find out if a potential
partner had a pet or siblings, where he went to high school, and
what his interests and life goals are. Today, a couple on a first
date might come armed with the most insignificant and inti-
mate details of each other’s lives without ever having had a
conversation.
Not only providing new ways for friends and family or
romantic partners to connect, social media increasingly serve
as a platform for professional communication. Seemingly no
one is immune to the siren’s song of social media. For example,
on the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy
(AAMFT) website, one can find Facebook, Twitter, and
MySpace icons.
EthicsThe Ethical Use of Social Media in Marriageand Fam.docxmodi11
Ethics
The Ethical Use of Social Media in Marriage
and Family Therapy: Recommendations
and Future Directions
Nickolas A. Jordan
1
, Lindy Russell
1
, Elnaz Afousi
2
, Tasha Chemel
2
,
Melissa McVicker
2
, Janet Robertson
2
, and John Winek
1
Abstract
Increasingly, people spend time online, communicating via e-mail, websites, instant messages, and various social media platforms
that incorporate text, video, and online photo albums. Social media have altered the way people spend their time and commu-
nicate with each other; this includes mental health professionals. It is imperative that therapists are knowledgeable about the ways
social media affects clients’ personal interactions as well as the ethical implications of their own professional use of social media.
Professional organizations do not provide adequate ethical guidelines for therapeutic practice regarding social media; therefore,
ethical codes should be adjusted to include the new media as they arise. After reviewing related literature from other mental
health disciplines, the authors offer recommendations to be integrated into the professional ethical codes for mental health pro-
fessionals to ensure the ethical use of social media in therapy. The authors organize their recommendations around several key
principles from various mental health codes of ethics.
Keywords
ethics, marriage and family therapy, social media, online, confidentiality, professional competence, responsibility to clients
Social media such as Facebook, Twitter, eHarmony, and
MySpace have come to dominate popular culture. People have
access to friends and family through social media virtually at
all times. Whether at home on the desktop computer, in the
library with a laptop, or on the go with a smart phone, friends,
‘‘fans,’’ and ‘‘followers’’ are never more than a few clicks
away. For the purposes of this work, social media—sometimes
referred to as social networks—are defined as Internet-based
applications used in direct and indirect social interactions.
Social media have become entrenched in how many people
communicate with one another. It has even been argued that the
order of relationship development has changed (Palfrey & Gas-
ser, 2008). In the past, it would have been necessary to engage
in some sort of conversation in order to find out if a potential
partner had a pet or siblings, where he went to high school, and
what his interests and life goals are. Today, a couple on a first
date might come armed with the most insignificant and inti-
mate details of each other’s lives without ever having had a
conversation.
Not only providing new ways for friends and family or
romantic partners to connect, social media increasingly serve
as a platform for professional communication. Seemingly no
one is immune to the siren’s song of social media. For example,
on the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy
(AAMFT) website, one can find Facebook, Twitter, and
MySpace icons ...
Community engagement 101 CBPR Overview.pptxBonnieDuran1
1. Introductions /Share past experience and future plans for CBPR research
2. Define and describe community-based participatory research (CBPR) for health in AI/AN communities
3. Explore the history of CBPR
4. Identify and describe theoretical approaches that align with AIAN CBPR.
The job is just to read each individual peer post that I put there.docxarmitageclaire49
The job is just to read each individual peer post that I put there and respond to them with a response of 3-4 sentences long
Peer #1
For the Research Assignment, I have chosen to focus on an area of Healthcare that rarely gets the
attention it deserves Mental health. I
chose this topic because I am personally effected by it and so are many millions of Americans. Mental illness is also one of the leading causes of
death in our nation and one life is lost as a result of suicide, abuse or incarceration every 17mins in the United States. Mental illness has been my
area of focus throughout this program and the advocacy and participatory philosophy will be useful for the final project because it suggests that “
that research inquiry needs to be intertwined with politics and a political agenda” (Creswell, p.9). I do believe that mental health has a specific
agenda for a study and that there has been constant aim for reform in healthcare and mental health. This social issue is definitely pertinent right
now and topics that address it such as “empowerment, inequality, oppression, domination, suppression, and alienation” (Creswell, p.9), and are
really the focus of the study. The goal of this project for me, is to provide a voice to participants and give them the ability address the concerns that
will lead to reform.
According to Kemmis and Wilkinson (1998) this philosophy offers four key features of the advocacy/participatory framework of inquiry:
1. Participatory actions are focused on bringing about change, and at the end of this type of study, researchers create an action agenda for change.
2. It is focused on freeing individuals from societal constraints, which is why the study begins with an important issue currently in society.
3. It aims to create a political debate so that change will occur.
4. Since advocacy/participatory researchers engage participants as active contributors to the research, it is a collaborative experience.
Research Problem Statement
My Vision is to Provide members of the community with the opportunities and education needed to prevent death due to suicide, acts of self-harm
and the traumatic impact of mental illness. By promoting resilience, the enhancement of community resources, conflict resolution and support for
individuals, families and the communities of those who suffer with mental disorders, illness or have a sudden mental health crisis. The target
population includes all individuals within Chatham County, with unmet mental health needs. These individuals are currently not being served by
traditional methods due to financial, structural, and personal barriers including access and stigma. Untreated mental health issues of these
individuals put them at risk for exacerbation of physical health problems, suicide attempts, premature moves to long-term care se.
Health Psychology: Clinical Supervision Course 3 Part Series Michael Changaris
Supervision is a vital skill for psychologists and particularly health psychologists. To this end, IHPTP offers a supervision training track to ensure that graduates of the program can make powerful and lasting contributions to the field of psychology as a whole and health psychology.
Training in methods of supervision is sequential, cumulative, and graded in complexity. In the month-long orientation, interns are provided an introduction to the program's provision of supervision. This training includes expectations, roles, supervisor availability, types of supervision (in vivo, individual, group), the structure of supervision, how to use supervision effectively, and ethical and legal responsibilities. Interns will develop skills in how to fill out and use the required California Board of Psychology forms.
Interns will attend three yearly seminars that cover key domains of supervision, including legal and ethics overview, key supervision competencies, guidelines, relationships, professionalism, diversity, evaluation and feedback, and management of supervisees who do not meet performance competency standards. The seminars allow for discussion of previous supervision experiences and self-assessment about areas of needed development and supervision in the integrated health setting.
WORKING WITH COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKERS AS ‘VOLUNTEERS’IN A VA.docxdunnramage
WORKING WITH COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKERS AS ‘VOLUNTEERS’
IN A VACCINE TRIAL: PRACTICAL AND ETHICAL EXPERIENCES
AND IMPLICATIONS
VIBIAN ANGWENYI, DORCAS KAMUYA, DOROTHY MWACHIRO, VICKI MARSH,
PATRICIA NJUGUNA AND SASSY MOLYNEUX
Keywords
developing world bioethics,
research ethics,
informed consent,
clinical trials,
sub-Saharan Africa
ABSTRACT
Community engagement is increasingly emphasized in biomedical research,
as a right in itself, and to strengthen ethical practice. We draw on interviews
and observations to consider the practical and ethical implications of involv-
ing Community Health Workers (CHWs) as part of a community engagement
strategy for a vaccine trial on the Kenyan Coast. CHWs were initially engaged
as an important network to be informed about the trial. However over time,
and in response to community advice, they became involved in trial informa-
tion sharing and identifying potential participants; thereby taking on roles that
overlapped with those of employed fieldworkers (FWs). While CHWs involve-
ment was generally perceived as positive and appreciated, there were chal-
lenges in their relations with FWs and other community members, partly
related to levels and forms of remuneration. Specifically, payment of CHWs
was not as high as for FWs and was based on ‘performance’. This extrinsic
motivation had the potential to crowd out CHWs intrinsic motivation to
perform their pre-existing community roles. CHWs remuneration potentially
also contributed to CHWs distorting trial information to encourage community
members to participate; and to researchers encouraging CHWs to utilize their
social connections and status to increase the numbers of people who
attended information giving sessions. Individual consent processes were
protected in this trial through final information sharing and consent being
conducted by trained clinical staff who were not embedded in study commu-
nities. However, our experiences suggest that roles and remuneration of all
front line staff and volunteers involved in trials need careful consideration
from the outset, and monitoring and discussion over time.
BACKGROUND
Community engagement is increasingly emphasized as
central to biomedical research in international settings,
both as a right in itself, and as a means to uphold ethical
principles, enhance protection and benefits, create legiti-
macy, share responsibility between researchers and com-
munities, and strengthen science.1 Communities can
potentially be involved in a broad range of research activi-
ties, from protocol development, to research conduct,
reviewing access to data and samples, and dissemination
or publication of research findings. Community members
are also often employed in research studies to simultane-
ously recruit, and conduct research processes such as
interviews and simple study procedures. Less commonly
community members may also recruit participants as part
1 E. Emanuel, et al. What makes clinical research in developing coun-
t.
Ethical principles in research- the set of standards and principle.docxSANSKAR20
Ethical principles in research- the set of standards and principles used to determine appropriate and acceptable research conduct.
General Principles
The following General Principles are aspirational and serve as a guide for sociologists in determining ethical courses of action in various contexts. They exemplify the highest ideals of professional conduct.
Principle A: Professional Competence
Sociologists strive to maintain the highest levels of competence in their work; they recognize the limitations of their expertise; and they under take only those tasks for which they are qualified by education, training, or experience. They recognize the need for on going education in order to remain professionally competent; and they utilize the appropriate scientific, professional, technical, and administrative resources needed to ensure competence in their professional activities. They consult with other professionals when necessary for the benefit of their students, research participants, and clients.
Principle B: Integrity
Sociologists are honest, fair, and respectful of others in their professional activities in research, teaching, practice, and service. Sociologists do not knowingly act in ways that jeopardize either their own or others’ professional welfare. Sociologists conduct their affairs in ways that inspire trust and confidence; they do not knowingly make statements that are false, misleading, or deceptive.
Principle C: Professional and Scientific Responsibility
Sociologists adhere to the highest scientific and professional standards and accept responsibility for their work. Sociologists understand that they form a community and show respect for other sociologists even when they disagree on theoretical, methodological, or personal approaches to professional activities. Sociologists value the public trust in sociology and are concerned about their ethical behavior and that of other sociologists that might compromise that trust. While endeavoring always to be collegial, sociologists must never let the desire to be collegial outweigh their shared responsibility for ethical behavior. When appropriate, they consult with colleagues in order to prevent or avoid unethical conduct.
Principle D:Respect for People’s Rights, Dignity, and Diversity
Sociologists respect the rights, dignity, and worth of all people. They strive to eliminate bias in their professional activities, and they do not tolerate any forms of discrimination based on age; gender; race; ethnicity; national origin; religion; sexual orientation; disability; health conditions; or marital, domestic, or parental status. They are sensitive to cultural, individual, and role differences in serving, teaching, and studying groups of people with distinctive characteristics. In all of their workrelated activities, sociologists acknowledge the rights of others to hold values, attitudes, and opinions that differ from their own.
Principle E: Social Responsibility
Sociologists are aware of ...
EthicsThe Ethical Use of Social Media in Marriageand Fam.docxhumphrieskalyn
Ethics
The Ethical Use of Social Media in Marriage
and Family Therapy: Recommendations
and Future Directions
Nickolas A. Jordan
1
, Lindy Russell
1
, Elnaz Afousi
2
, Tasha Chemel
2
,
Melissa McVicker
2
, Janet Robertson
2
, and John Winek
1
Abstract
Increasingly, people spend time online, communicating via e-mail, websites, instant messages, and various social media platforms
that incorporate text, video, and online photo albums. Social media have altered the way people spend their time and commu-
nicate with each other; this includes mental health professionals. It is imperative that therapists are knowledgeable about the ways
social media affects clients’ personal interactions as well as the ethical implications of their own professional use of social media.
Professional organizations do not provide adequate ethical guidelines for therapeutic practice regarding social media; therefore,
ethical codes should be adjusted to include the new media as they arise. After reviewing related literature from other mental
health disciplines, the authors offer recommendations to be integrated into the professional ethical codes for mental health pro-
fessionals to ensure the ethical use of social media in therapy. The authors organize their recommendations around several key
principles from various mental health codes of ethics.
Keywords
ethics, marriage and family therapy, social media, online, confidentiality, professional competence, responsibility to clients
Social media such as Facebook, Twitter, eHarmony, and
MySpace have come to dominate popular culture. People have
access to friends and family through social media virtually at
all times. Whether at home on the desktop computer, in the
library with a laptop, or on the go with a smart phone, friends,
‘‘fans,’’ and ‘‘followers’’ are never more than a few clicks
away. For the purposes of this work, social media—sometimes
referred to as social networks—are defined as Internet-based
applications used in direct and indirect social interactions.
Social media have become entrenched in how many people
communicate with one another. It has even been argued that the
order of relationship development has changed (Palfrey & Gas-
ser, 2008). In the past, it would have been necessary to engage
in some sort of conversation in order to find out if a potential
partner had a pet or siblings, where he went to high school, and
what his interests and life goals are. Today, a couple on a first
date might come armed with the most insignificant and inti-
mate details of each other’s lives without ever having had a
conversation.
Not only providing new ways for friends and family or
romantic partners to connect, social media increasingly serve
as a platform for professional communication. Seemingly no
one is immune to the siren’s song of social media. For example,
on the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy
(AAMFT) website, one can find Facebook, Twitter, and
MySpace icons.
EthicsThe Ethical Use of Social Media in Marriageand Fam.docxmodi11
Ethics
The Ethical Use of Social Media in Marriage
and Family Therapy: Recommendations
and Future Directions
Nickolas A. Jordan
1
, Lindy Russell
1
, Elnaz Afousi
2
, Tasha Chemel
2
,
Melissa McVicker
2
, Janet Robertson
2
, and John Winek
1
Abstract
Increasingly, people spend time online, communicating via e-mail, websites, instant messages, and various social media platforms
that incorporate text, video, and online photo albums. Social media have altered the way people spend their time and commu-
nicate with each other; this includes mental health professionals. It is imperative that therapists are knowledgeable about the ways
social media affects clients’ personal interactions as well as the ethical implications of their own professional use of social media.
Professional organizations do not provide adequate ethical guidelines for therapeutic practice regarding social media; therefore,
ethical codes should be adjusted to include the new media as they arise. After reviewing related literature from other mental
health disciplines, the authors offer recommendations to be integrated into the professional ethical codes for mental health pro-
fessionals to ensure the ethical use of social media in therapy. The authors organize their recommendations around several key
principles from various mental health codes of ethics.
Keywords
ethics, marriage and family therapy, social media, online, confidentiality, professional competence, responsibility to clients
Social media such as Facebook, Twitter, eHarmony, and
MySpace have come to dominate popular culture. People have
access to friends and family through social media virtually at
all times. Whether at home on the desktop computer, in the
library with a laptop, or on the go with a smart phone, friends,
‘‘fans,’’ and ‘‘followers’’ are never more than a few clicks
away. For the purposes of this work, social media—sometimes
referred to as social networks—are defined as Internet-based
applications used in direct and indirect social interactions.
Social media have become entrenched in how many people
communicate with one another. It has even been argued that the
order of relationship development has changed (Palfrey & Gas-
ser, 2008). In the past, it would have been necessary to engage
in some sort of conversation in order to find out if a potential
partner had a pet or siblings, where he went to high school, and
what his interests and life goals are. Today, a couple on a first
date might come armed with the most insignificant and inti-
mate details of each other’s lives without ever having had a
conversation.
Not only providing new ways for friends and family or
romantic partners to connect, social media increasingly serve
as a platform for professional communication. Seemingly no
one is immune to the siren’s song of social media. For example,
on the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy
(AAMFT) website, one can find Facebook, Twitter, and
MySpace icons ...
Community engagement 101 CBPR Overview.pptxBonnieDuran1
1. Introductions /Share past experience and future plans for CBPR research
2. Define and describe community-based participatory research (CBPR) for health in AI/AN communities
3. Explore the history of CBPR
4. Identify and describe theoretical approaches that align with AIAN CBPR.
The job is just to read each individual peer post that I put there.docxarmitageclaire49
The job is just to read each individual peer post that I put there and respond to them with a response of 3-4 sentences long
Peer #1
For the Research Assignment, I have chosen to focus on an area of Healthcare that rarely gets the
attention it deserves Mental health. I
chose this topic because I am personally effected by it and so are many millions of Americans. Mental illness is also one of the leading causes of
death in our nation and one life is lost as a result of suicide, abuse or incarceration every 17mins in the United States. Mental illness has been my
area of focus throughout this program and the advocacy and participatory philosophy will be useful for the final project because it suggests that “
that research inquiry needs to be intertwined with politics and a political agenda” (Creswell, p.9). I do believe that mental health has a specific
agenda for a study and that there has been constant aim for reform in healthcare and mental health. This social issue is definitely pertinent right
now and topics that address it such as “empowerment, inequality, oppression, domination, suppression, and alienation” (Creswell, p.9), and are
really the focus of the study. The goal of this project for me, is to provide a voice to participants and give them the ability address the concerns that
will lead to reform.
According to Kemmis and Wilkinson (1998) this philosophy offers four key features of the advocacy/participatory framework of inquiry:
1. Participatory actions are focused on bringing about change, and at the end of this type of study, researchers create an action agenda for change.
2. It is focused on freeing individuals from societal constraints, which is why the study begins with an important issue currently in society.
3. It aims to create a political debate so that change will occur.
4. Since advocacy/participatory researchers engage participants as active contributors to the research, it is a collaborative experience.
Research Problem Statement
My Vision is to Provide members of the community with the opportunities and education needed to prevent death due to suicide, acts of self-harm
and the traumatic impact of mental illness. By promoting resilience, the enhancement of community resources, conflict resolution and support for
individuals, families and the communities of those who suffer with mental disorders, illness or have a sudden mental health crisis. The target
population includes all individuals within Chatham County, with unmet mental health needs. These individuals are currently not being served by
traditional methods due to financial, structural, and personal barriers including access and stigma. Untreated mental health issues of these
individuals put them at risk for exacerbation of physical health problems, suicide attempts, premature moves to long-term care se.
Similar to Advanced Social Work Practice In Clinical Social Work (20)
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
2. Conveners
Ira Colby
University of Houston
Carolyn Jacobs
Smith College
Barbara Shank
University of St. Thomas/St. Catherine University
Steering Committee Members
Jill Baker
New Mexico Highlands University
Elizabeth Dungee-Anderson
Virginia Commonwealth University
Susan Gray
Barry University
JoAnn McFall
Michigan State University
Dennis Miehls
Smith College
David Roseborough
University of St. Thomas/St. Catherine University
Jonathan Singer
Temple University
Luis Torres
University of Houston
Clinical Social Work Meeting Participants
Council on Social Work Education Staff
Judith Bremner
Acting Director of Accreditation
Jessica Holmes
Associate Director for Research
Andrea Bediako
Research Assistant
Margaret Arnd-Caddigan
East Carolina University
Donna DeAngelis
Association of Social
Work Boards
Alfredo Garcia
New Mexico Highlands
University
Barbara Gissett
East Tennessee State
University
Shinaz Jindani
Savannah State University
Carol Kuechler
St. Catherine University/
University of St. Thomas
Virginia Majewski
Indiana University
Susan Mason
Yeshiva University
Amanda Duffy Randall
Association of Social
Work Boards
John Ronnau
University of Central
Florida
Martha Sawyer
Norfolk State University
Nora Smith
Monmouth University
Howard Snooks
American Board of
Examiners Center for
Clinical Social Work
Sandra Turner
Fordham University
Thomas Walsh
Boston College
James Williams
Savannah State University
James Herbert Williams
University of Denver
3. 1
Advanced Social Work Practice
in Clinical Social Work
Background
I
n June 2008 the Council on Social Work Education (CSWE) approved
the 2008 Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards (EPAS), which
moved social work to a competency-based outcomes approach to educa-
tion. The goal of this outcomes performance approach is to ensure that social
work graduates are prepared to work competently with individuals, families,
groups, organizations, and communities. The 2008 EPAS defines 10 compe-
tencies (EP 2.1.1—EP 2.1.10), which are common to all social work practice.
Each competency is composed of knowledge, values, and skills that define
what social workers must know and be able to do to practice effectively.
For social workers at the advanced practice level the 2008 EPAS further de-
fines that
advanced practice incorporates all of the core competencies augmented
by knowledge and practice behaviors specific to a concentration. (EP
M2.2; CSWE 2008a)
On passing the 2008 EPAS, CSWE agreed to work with the education com-
munity to provide resources for crafting knowledge and practice behaviors
specific to a concentration. The first of these resources, Advanced Social Work
Practice in the Prevention of Substance Use Disorders, was published in fall 2008
(CSWE, 2008b). The publication included prevention knowledge and prac-
tice behaviors for each of the 10 competencies to define effective advanced
practice in prevention of substance use disorders. This document was the
first of its kind; therefore, it also outlined a process by which other docu-
ments could be developed for concentrations and receive an endorsement
from CSWE.
Development of a Clinical Social Work Statement
In 2009 many social work programs had begun to think about curriculum
under the 2008 EPAS and to work on self-study documents. As they were do-
ing so, Ira Colby, Carolyn Jacobs, and Barbara Shank thought that it would
be helpful for programs with a clinical social work concentration to collabo-
rate in developing a clinical social work statement. The three approached
CSWE, which agreed to host a meeting at the CSWE offices in Alexandria,
VA. An e-mail invitation was sent to programs that reported having a clinical
social work concentration. The list of invitees was generated from programs
whose Web sites indicated the existence of a clinical concentration. In all, 47
programs were invited to attend.
The 2-day meeting was held August 3–4, 2009; 31 people attended from 21
institutions. Participants included program administrators, faculty members,
and representatives from associations. Ira Colby, Carolyn Jacobs, and Barbara
Shank facilitated the meeting. Dean Pierce, emeritus director of accredita-
tion, provided an overview about the 2008 EPAS and advanced practice to
ensure that meeting attendees understood the standards. Accreditation staff
members, including Judith Bremner, acting director of accreditation, were
4. 2 Advanced Social Work Practice in Clinical Social Work
also on-hand to respond to questions and make certain that the work was
formatted consistently with 2008 EPAS. During the 2-day meeting, partici-
pants drafted a definition of clinical social work, knowledge, and practice
behaviors related to each of the 10 competencies. At the end of the meeting,
an eight-person steering committee was formed to move forward with editing
the document.
The steering committee conducted the remaining work by e-mail and conference
call. After revising the work completed during the meeting, the steering com-
mittee solicited feedback from three groups: (1) participants from the August
meeting; (2) Wynne Korr, chair of the Commission on Accreditation; and (3)
the broader clinical social work education community. The steering committee
considered the feedback from all three groups before finalizing the publication.
Clinical Social Work
Consistent with EP M2.2, the following document augments and applies
knowledge and practice behaviors for advanced practice in clinical social
work for each of the 10 competencies. Taken together these competencies are
intended to frame a concentration in clinical social work. Following each of
the 10 competencies, clinical social work knowledge is outlined in paragraph
format, and the practice behaviors follow in the bullet points. The clinical so-
cial work material can be seen at a glance in the matrix beginning on p.11.
As a specialty within the practice of social work, clinical social work builds on
professional values, ethics, principles, practice methods, and the person-in-
environment perspective of the profession. It reflects the profession’s mission
to promote social and economic justice by empowering clients who experi-
ence oppression or vulnerability. Clinical social work requires the professional
use of self to restore, maintain, and enhance the biological, psychological,
social, and spiritual functioning of individuals, families, and groups. The
practice of clinical social work requires the application of advanced clini-
cal knowledge and clinical skills in multidimensional assessment, diagnosis,
and treatment of psychosocial dysfunction, disability, or impairment includ-
ing emotional, mental, and behavioral disorders, conditions, and addictions.
Clinical practice interventions include case formulation based on differential
diagnosis and assessment of risks and vulnerabilities and those factors that
produce and constrain the strengths and resilience found in the transactions
among people, their communities, and the larger social environment. Treat-
ment methods include the provision of individual, family, and group work.
Clinical social workers are engaged in crisis intervention, brief and long-term
psychotherapy and counseling, client-centered advocacy, consultation, and
evaluation. Interventions responsive to all dimensions of diversity are applied
within the context of the therapeutic relationship guided by best practices
and evidence-based guidelines. Clinical supervision is an important feature of
clinical social work in agencies, organizations, and private practice settings.
Clinical social work practice augments the 10 core competencies with knowl-
edge and practice behaviors, which can be used to operationalize curriculum
and assessment measures. Clinical social work is grounded in the values of
the profession:
Service, social justice, the dignity and worth of the person, the impor-
tance of human relationships, integrity, competence,1
human rights, and
1
These six value elements reflect the National Association of Social Workers Code of Ethics
(NASW, 1999).
5. 3
scientific inquiry are among the core values of social work. These values
underpin the explicit and implicit curriculum and frame the profession’s
commitment to respect for all people and the quest for social and eco-
nomic justice. (EP 1.1; CSWE, 2008a)
Educational Policy 2.1.1—Identify as a professional social worker and
conduct oneself accordingly.
Social workers serve as representatives of the profession, its mission, and its
core values. They know the profession’s history. Social workers commit them-
selves to the profession’s enhancement and to their own professional conduct
and growth. Social workers
advocate for client access to the services of social work;
practice personal reflection and self-correction to assure continual profes-
sional development;
attend to professional roles and boundaries;
demonstrate professional demeanor in behavior, appearance, and commu-
nication;
engage in career-long learning; and
use supervision and consultation.
Advanced practitioners in clinical social work recognize the importance of the
therapeutic relationship, the person-in-environment and strengths perspec-
tives, the professional use of self with clients, and adherence to ethical guide-
lines of professional behavior. Advanced practitioners in clinical social work
readily identify as social work professionals;
demonstrate professional use of self with client(s);
understand and identify professional strengths, limitations and challenges;
and
develop, manage, and maintain therapeutic relationships with clients within
the person-in-environment and strengths perspectives.
6. 4 Advanced Social Work Practice in Clinical Social Work
Educational Policy 2.1.2—Apply social work ethical principles to guide
professional practice.
Social workers have an obligation to conduct themselves ethically and
to engage in ethical decision-making. Social workers are knowledgeable
about the value base of the profession, its ethical standards, and relevant
law. Social workers
recognize and manage personal values in a way that allows professional val-
ues to guide practice;
make ethical decisions by applying standards of the National Association
of Social Workers Code of Ethics (NASW, 1999) and, as applicable, of
the International Federation of Social Workers/International Association
of Schools of Social Work Ethics in Social Work, Statement of Principles
(IFSW, 2004);
tolerate ambiguity in resolving ethical conflicts; and
apply strategies of ethical reasoning to arrive at principled decisions.
Advanced practitioners in clinical social work are knowledgeable about ethi-
cal issues, legal parameters, and shifting societal mores that affect the thera-
peutic relationship. Advanced practitioners in clinical social work
apply ethical decision-making skills to issues specific to clinical social
work;
employ strategies of ethical reasoning to address the use of technology in
clinical practice and its effect on client rights;
identify and use knowledge of relationship dynamics, including power dif-
ferentials; and
recognize and manage personal biases as they affect the therapeutic relation-
ship in the service of the clients’ well-being.
7. 5
Educational Policy 2.1.3—Apply critical thinking to inform and
communicate professional judgments.
Social workers are knowledgeable about the principles of logic, scientific in-
quiry, and reasoned discernment. They use critical thinking augmented by
creativity and curiosity. Critical thinking also requires the synthesis and com-
munication of relevant information. Social workers
distinguish, appraise, and integrate multiple sources of knowledge, includ-
ing research-based knowledge and practice wisdom;
analyze models of assessment, prevention, intervention, and evaluation;
and
demonstrate effective oral and written communication in working with in-
dividuals, families, groups, organizations, communities, and colleagues.
Advanced practitioners understand and differentiate the strengths and limita-
tions of multiple practice theories and methods, clinical processes, and tech-
nical tools, including differential diagnosis. They deconstruct theories and
methods to evaluate how they relate to clients and client systems within their
environmental context. They regularly question and reflect on their own as-
sumptions and consider how these might affect practice. Advanced practitio-
ners in clinical social work
engage in reflective practice;
identify and articulate clients’ strengths and vulnerabilities;
evaluate, select, and implement appropriate multidimensional assessment,
diagnostic, intervention, and practice evaluation tools;
evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of multiple theoretical perspectives
and differentially apply them to client situations; and
communicate professional judgments to other social workers and to profes-
sionals from other disciplines, in both verbal and written format.
Educational Policy 2.1.4—Engage diversity and difference in practice.
Social workers understand how diversity characterizes and shapes the human
experience and is critical to the formation of identity. The dimensions of
diversity are understood as the intersectionality of multiple factors including
age, class, color, culture, disability, ethnicity, gender, gender identity and ex-
pression, immigration status, political ideology, race, religion, sex, and sexual
orientation. Social workers appreciate that, as a consequence of difference, a
person’s life experiences may include oppression, poverty, marginalization,
and alienation as well as privilege, power, and acclaim. Social workers
recognize the extent to which a culture’s structures and values may oppress,
marginalize, alienate, or create or enhance privilege and power;
gain sufficient self-awareness to eliminate the influence of personal biases
and values in working with diverse groups;
recognize and communicate their understanding of the importance of dif-
ference in shaping life experiences; and
view themselves as learners and engage those with whom they work as
informants.
Advanced practitioners are knowledgeable about many forms of diversity and
difference and how these influence the therapeutic relationship and clients’
presenting issues. Advanced practitioners are knowledgeable about the ways
in which various dimensions of diversity affect (a) explanations of illness, (b)
help-seeking behaviors, and (c) healing practices (Cal-SWEC, 2006). Ad-
vanced practitioners are cultural beings and understand how clinical practice
choices can be culture-bound. Advanced practitioners in clinical social work
8. 6 Advanced Social Work Practice in Clinical Social Work
research and apply knowledge of diverse populations to enhance client well-
being;
work effectively with diverse populations; and
identify and use practitioner/client differences from a strengths perspective.
Educational Policy 2.1.5—Advance human rights and social
and economic justice.
Each person, regardless of position in society, has basic human rights, such
as freedom, safety, privacy, an adequate standard of living, health care, and
education. Social workers recognize the global interconnections of oppression
and are knowledgeable about theories of justice and strategies to promote
human and civil rights. Social work incorporates social justice practices in or-
ganizations, institutions, and society to ensure that these basic human rights
are distributed equitably and without prejudice. Social workers
understand the forms and mechanisms of oppression and discrimination;
advocate for human rights and social and economic justice; and
engage in practices that advance social and economic justice.
Advanced practitioners in clinical social work understand the potentially
challenging effects of economic, social, and cultural factors in the lives of
clients and client systems. Advanced practitioners understand the stigma and
shame associated with disorders, diagnoses, and help-seeking behaviors across
diverse populations. They also understand strategies for advancing human
rights and social and economic justice in domestic and global contexts. Ad-
vanced practitioners in clinical social work
9. 7
use knowledge of the effects of oppression, discrimination, and historical
trauma on client and client systems to guide treatment planning and inter-
vention; and
advocate at multiple levels for mental health parity and reduction of health
disparities for diverse populations.
Educational Policy 2.1.6—Engage in research-informed practice and
practice-informed research.
Social workers use practice experience to inform research; employ evidence-
based interventions; evaluate their own practice; and use research findings
to improve practice, policy, and social service delivery. Social workers com-
prehend quantitative and qualitative research and understand scientific and
ethical approaches to building knowledge. Social workers
use practice experience to inform scientific inquiry and
use research evidence to inform practice.
Advanced clinical practitioners are knowledgeable about evidence-based in-
terventions, best practices, and the evidence-based research process. Advanced
practitioners in clinical social work
use the evidence-based practice process in clinical assessment and interven-
tion with clients;
participate in the generation of new clinical knowledge, through research
and practice; and
use research methodology to evaluate clinical practice effectiveness and/or
outcomes.
Educational Policy 2.1.7—Apply knowledge of human behavior and the
social environment.
Social workers are knowledgeable about human behavior across the life
course, the range of social systems in which people live, and the ways social
systems promote or deter people in maintaining or achieving health and well-
being. Social workers apply theories and knowledge from the liberal arts to
understand biological, social, cultural, psychological, and spiritual develop-
ment. Social workers
use conceptual frameworks to guide the processes of assessment, interven-
tion, and evaluation; and
critique and apply knowledge to understand person and environment.
Advanced practitioners understand how to synthesize and differentially apply
the theories of human behavior and the social environment (biological, devel-
opmental, psychological, social, cultural, and spiritual).They are familiar with
diagnostic classification systems used in the formulation of a comprehensive
assessment. Advanced practitioners understand how sociocultural contexts
influence definitions of psychopathology. They have a working knowledge of
psychotropic medications that are typically used in the treatment of mental
health disorders, including expected results and side effects. Advanced practi-
tioners in clinical social work
synthesize and differentially apply theories of human behavior and the social
environment to guide clinical practice;
use bio-psycho-social-spiritual theories and multiaxial diagnostic classifica-
tion systems in formulation of comprehensive assessments; and
consult with medical professionals, as needed, to confirm diagnosis and/or
to monitor medication in the treatment process.
10. 8 Advanced Social Work Practice in Clinical Social Work
Educational Policy 2.1.8—Engage in policy practice to advance social
and economic well-being and to deliver effective social work services.
Social work practitioners understand that policy affects service delivery, and
they actively engage in policy practice. Social workers know the history and
current structures of social policies and services, the role of policy in service
delivery, and the role of practice in policy development. Social workers
analyze, formulate, and advocate for policies that advance social well-being;
and
collaborate with colleagues and clients for effective policy action.
Advanced practitioners in clinical social work recognize the connection be-
tween clients, practice, and both public and organizational policy. Advanced
practitioners have knowledge about factors that influence the development of
legislation, policies, program services, and funding at all system levels. They
have knowledge of advocacy methods that contribute to effective policies that
promote social and economic well-being. Advanced practitioners in clinical
social work
communicate to stakeholders the implication of policies and policy change
in the lives of clients;
use evidence-based practice and practice-based evidence in advocacy for
policies that advance social and economic well-being; and
advocate with and inform administrators and legislators to influence poli-
cies that impact clients and service.
Educational Policy 2.1.9—Respond to contexts that shape practice.
Social workers are informed, resourceful, and proactive in responding to
evolving organizational, community, and societal contexts at all levels of prac-
tice. Social workers recognize that the context of practice is dynamic and use
knowledge and skill to respond proactively. Social workers
continuously discover, appraise, and attend to changing locales, populations,
scientific and technological developments, and emerging societal trends to
provide relevant services; and
provide leadership in promoting sustainable changes in service delivery and
practice to improve the quality of social services.
Advanced practitioners in clinical social work are knowledgeable about how
relational, organizational, and community systems may impact clients. They
anticipate and react to evolving cultural, technological, geographical, political,
legal, economic, and environmental contexts. They encourage clients to effect
changes within these contexts. Advanced practitioners in clinical social work
assess the quality of clients’ interactions within their social contexts;
develop intervention plans to accomplish systemic change; and
work collaboratively with others to effect systemic change that is sustainable.
Educational Policy 2.1.10(a)–(d)—Engage, assess, intervene, and
evaluate with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and
communities.
Professional practice involves the dynamic and interactive processes of en-
gagement, assessment, intervention, and evaluation at multiple levels. Social
workers have the knowledge and skills to practice with individuals, families,
groups, organizations, and communities. Practice knowledge includes iden-
tifying, analyzing, and implementing evidence-based interventions designed
to achieve client goals; using research and technological advances; evaluating
11. 9
program outcomes and practice effectiveness; developing, analyzing, advocat-
ing, and providing leadership for policies and services; and promoting social
and economic justice.
Clinical social work practice involves the dynamic, interactive, and reciprocal
processes of therapeutic engagement, multidimensional assessment, clinical
intervention, and practice evaluation at multiple levels. Advanced practitio-
ners have a theoretically informed knowledge base so as to effectively practice
with individuals, families, and groups. Clinical practice knowledge includes
understanding and implementing practice theories (models, metaperspec-
tives, strategies, techniques, and approaches); evaluating treatment outcomes
and practice effectiveness.
Educational Policy 2.1.10(a)—Engagement
Social workers
substantively and affectively prepare for action with individuals, families,
groups, organizations, and communities;
use empathy and other interpersonal skills; and
develop a mutually agreed-on focus of work and desired outcomes.
Advanced practitioners in clinical social work
develop a culturally responsive therapeutic relationship;
attend to the interpersonal dynamics and contextual factors that both
strengthen and potentially threaten the therapeutic alliance; and
establish a relationally based process that encourages clients to be equal par-
ticipants in the establishment of treatment goals and expected outcomes.
Educational Policy 2.1.10(b)—Assessment
Social workers
collect, organize, and interpret client data;
assess client strengths and limitations;
develop mutually agreed-on intervention goals and objectives; and
select appropriate intervention strategies.
Advanced practitioners in clinical social work
use multidimensional bio-psycho-social-spiritual assessment tools;
assess clients’ readiness for change;
assess client coping strategies to reinforce and improve adaptation to life
situations, circumstances, and events;
select and modify appropriate intervention strategies based on continuous
clinical assessment; and
use differential and multiaxial diagnoses.
Educational Policy 2.1.10(c)—Intervention
Social workers
initiate actions to achieve organizational goals;
implement prevention interventions that enhance client capacities;
help clients resolve problems;
negotiate, mediate, and advocate for clients; and
facilitate transitions and endings.
12. 10 Advanced Social Work Practice in Clinical Social Work
Advanced practitioners in clinical social work
critically evaluate, select, and apply best practices and evidence-based inter-
ventions;
demonstrate the use of appropriate clinical techniques for a range of pre-
senting concerns identified in the assessment, including crisis intervention
strategies as needed; and
collaborate with other professionals to coordinate treatment interventions.
Educational Policy 2.1.10(d)—Evaluation
Social workers critically analyze, monitor, and evaluate interventions.
Advanced practitioners in clinical social work
contribute to the theoretical knowledge base of the social work profession
through practice-based research; and
use clinical evaluation of the process and/or outcomes to develop best prac-
tice interventions for a range of bio-psycho-social-spiritual conditions.
13. 11
Advanced Social Work Practice in Clinical Social Work
Core Competency Clinical Knowledge
Clinical Practice
Behaviors
2.1.1 Identify as a
professional social worker
and conduct oneself
accordingly.
Recognize the impor-
tance of the therapeutic
relationship, the person-
in-environment and
strengths perspectives,
the professional use of self
with clients, and adher-
ence to ethical guidelines
of professional behavior.
Readily identify as social
work professionals.
Demonstrate professional
use of self with client(s).
Understand and identify
professional strengths,
limitations, and challenges.
Develop, manage, and
maintain therapeutic
relationships with clients
within the person-in-
environment and strengths
perspectives.
2.1.2 Apply social work
ethical principles to guide
professional practice.
Know about ethical issues,
legal parameters, and
shifting societal mores
that affect the therapeutic
relationship.
Apply ethical decision-
making skills to issues
specific to clinical social
work.
Employ strategies of ethi-
cal reasoning to address
the use of technology in
clinical practice and its
impact on client rights.
Identify and use knowl-
edge of relationship
dynamics, including power
differentials.
Recognize and manage
personal biases as they
affect the therapeutic
relationship in the service
of the clients’ well-being.
2.1.3 Apply critical thinking
to inform and communicate
professional judgments.
Understand and differenti-
ate the strengths and limi-
tations of multiple practice
theories and methods,
clinical processes, and
technical tools, including
differential diagnosis.
Deconstruct theories and
methods to evaluate how
they relate to clients and
client systems within their
environmental contexts.
Regularly question and
reflect on assumptions
and consider how these
might affect practice.
Engage in reflective
practice.
Identify and articulate
clients’ strengths and
vulnerabilities.
Evaluate, select, and
implement appropri-
ate multidimensional
assessment, diagnostic,
intervention, and practice
evaluation tools.
Evaluate the strengths and
weaknesses of multiple
theoretical perspectives
and differentially apply
them to client situations.
Communicate professional
judgments to other social
workers and to profession-
als from other disciplines,
in both verbal and written
formats.
14. 12 Advanced Social Work Practice in Clinical Social Work
2.1.4 Engage diversity and
difference in practice.
Know about many forms
of diversity and difference
and how these influence
the therapeutic relation-
ship and clients’ present-
ing issues.
Know about the ways in
which various dimen-
sions of diversity affect (a)
explanations of illness, (b)
help-seeking behaviors,
and (c) healing practices.
Advanced practitioners
are cultural beings and
understand how clinical
practice choices can be
culture-bound
Research and apply
knowledge of diverse
populations to enhance
client well-being.
Work effectively with
diverse populations.
Identify and use practitio-
ner/client differences from
a strengths perspective.
2.1.5 Advance human
rights and social and
economic justice.
Understand the poten-
tially challenging effects
of economic, social, and
cultural factors in the
lives of clients and client
systems.
Understand the stigma
and shame associated
with disorders, diagno-
ses, and help-seeking
behaviors across diverse
populations.
Understand strategies for
advancing human rights
and social and economic
justice in domestic and
global contexts.
Use knowledge of the
effects of oppression, dis-
crimination, and historical
trauma on client and client
systems to guide treatment
planning and intervention.
Advocate at multiple levels
for mental health parity
and reduction of health
disparities for diverse
populations.
2.1.6 Engage in research-
informed practice and
practice-informed research.
Know about evidence-
based interventions,
best practices, and the
evidence-based research
process.
Use the evidence-based
practice process in clinical
assessment and interven-
tion with clients.
Participate in the genera-
tion of new clinical knowl-
edge, through research
and practice.
Use research methodol-
ogy to evaluate clinical
practice effectiveness and/
or outcomes.
15. 13
2.1.7 Apply knowledge of
human behavior and the
social environment.
Understand how to
synthesize and differen-
tially apply the theories
of human behavior and
the social environment
(biological, developmen-
tal, psychological, social,
cultural, and spiritual).
Familiar with diagnostic
classification systems
used in the formulation
of a comprehensive
assessment.
Understand how
sociocultural contexts
influence definitions of
psychopathology.
Have a working knowledge
of psychotropic medica-
tions that are typically
used in the treatment of
mental health disorders,
including expected results
and side effects.
Synthesize and differential-
ly apply theories of human
behavior and the social
environment to guide clini-
cal practice.
Use bio-psycho-social-
spiritual theories and
multiaxial diagnostic
classification systems in
formulation of comprehen-
sive assessments.
Consult with medical
professionals, as needed,
to confirm diagnosis and/
or to monitor medication in
the treatment process.
2.1.8 Engage in policy
practice to advance social
and economic well-being
and to deliver effective social
work services.
Recognize the connection
between clients, practice,
and both public and orga-
nizational policy.
Know about factors that
influence the development
of legislation, policies, pro-
gram services, and fund-
ing at all system levels.
Know of advocacy
methods that contribute to
effective policies that pro-
mote social and economic
well-being.
Communicate to stake-
holders the implications of
policies and policy change
in the lives of clients.
Use evidence-based prac-
tice and practice-based
evidence in advocacy
for policies that advance
social and economic well-
being.
Advocate with and inform
administrators and legisla-
tors to influence policies
that affect clients and
service.
2.1.9 Respond to contexts
that shape practice.
Know how relational, orga-
nizational, and commu-
nity systems may impact
clients.
Anticipate and react to
evolving cultural, techno-
logical, geographical, politi-
cal, legal, economic, and
environmental contexts.
Encourage clients to effect
changes within these
contexts.
Assess the quality of
clients’ interactions within
their social contexts.
Develop intervention plans
to accomplish systemic
change.
Work collaboratively with
others to effect systemic
change that is sustainable.
16. 14 Advanced Social Work Practice in Clinical Social Work
2.1.10 (a–d) Engage,
assess, intervene, and
evaluate with individuals,
families, groups,
organizations, and
communities.
Involve the dynamic,
interactive, and reciprocal
processes of therapeutic
engagement, multidimen-
sional assessment, clinical
intervention, and practice
evaluation at multiple
levels.
Have a theoretically
informed knowledge base
so as to effectively practice
with individuals, families,
and groups.
Understand and imple-
ment practice theories
(models, metaperspec-
tives, strategies, tech-
niques, and approaches).
Evaluate treatment
outcomes and practice
effectiveness.
2.1.10 (a)—Engagement Develop a culturally
responsive therapeutic
relationship.
Attend to the interpersonal
dynamics and contextual
factors that both strength-
en and potentially threaten
the therapeutic alliance.
Establish a relation-
ally based process that
encourages clients to be
equal participants in the
establishment of treat-
ment goals and expected
outcomes.
2.1.10 (b)—Assessment Use multidimensional
bio-psycho-social-spiritual
assessment tools.
Assess clients’ readiness
for change.
Assess client’s coping
strategies to reinforce and
improve adaptation to life
situations, circumstances,
and events.
Select and modify appro-
priate intervention strate-
gies based on continuous
clinical assessment.
Use differential and multi-
axial diagnoses.
17. 15
2.1.10 (c)—Intervention Critically evaluate, select,
and apply best practices
and evidence-based inter-
ventions.
Demonstrate the use
of appropriate clinical
techniques for a range of
presenting concerns iden-
tified in the assessment,
including crisis interven-
tion strategies as needed.
Collaborate with other
professionals to coordinate
treatment interventions.
2.1.10 (d)—Evaluation Contribute to the theoreti-
cal knowledge base of the
social work profession
through practice-based
research.
Use clinical evaluation
of the process and/or
outcomes to develop best
practice interventions for a
range of bio-psycho-social-
spiritual conditions.
18. 16 Advanced Social Work Practice in Clinical Social Work
References
Cal-SWEC. (2006). A competency-based curriculum in community mental health for
graduate social work students. Retrieved September 24, 2009, from http://calswec.berkeley.
edu/calswec/MH_Competencies_Fdn_06.pdf
Council on Social Work Education. (2008a). Educational policy and accreditation standards.
Retrieved October 9, 2009, from http://www.cswe.org/NR/rdonlyres/2A81732E-1776-4175-
AC42-65974E96BE66/0/2008EducationalPolicyandAccreditationStandards.pdf
Council on Social Work Education. (2008b). Advanced social work practice in the prevention of
substance use disorders. Alexandria, VA: Author.
International Federation of Social Workers. (IFSW) and International Association of Schools
of Social Work. (2004). Ethics in social work, statement of principles. Retrieved January 2, 2008,
from http://www.ifsw.org/en/p38000324.html
National Association of Social Workers. (NASW). (1999). Code of ethics for social workers.
Washington, DC: Author.
19.
20. COUNCIL ON SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION
1725 DUKE STREET, SUITE 500
ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-3457
PRSRT STD
U.S. POSTAGE
PAID
Dulles, VA
Permit No. 382