POWERFLEX
ADAPTIVE CHARGING NETWORK
OUR GARAGES are the Gas Stations of the
FUTURE
Where and How Will Drivers Charge?
Our Garages are the Gas Stations of the Future
EV owners want to be able to charge
in convenient locations on extended
trips
ON THE GO
Drivers want to charge at home and
at work
LOCATION
Many drivers depend on leaving their
cars overnight for their next day
commute
CHARGE TIME
3
It’s not TOO much of a
trip hazard. . . . .
. . . . . Right?
PowerFlex
A New Paradigm
Mountain view Highschool-Los Altos School District
BENEFITS of PowerFlex
Infrastructure Cost
Reduces the power
required to new
buildings and
eliminates the need
for the addition of new
power to existing
buildings
Charger
Installation Cost
Charging stations and
monitoring are much
less than the cost of
traditional electric
vehicle charging
stations.
Design Flexibility
Three different levels
of installation
designed to meet
your budget and
flexible options for
charging customers
Load Management
By monitoring a
building’s power and
consumption,
PowerFlex reduces
peak power while
charging up to 100
vehicles.
SAVE MONEY
With PowerFlex
With less electric service capacity needed for new and
existing buildings, Powerflex saves money for developers
and owners.
With full installation, PowerFlex can cost up to 35% less
than traditional EV charging systems and allow for 100
vehicles to be charged simultaneously
Less power needed for buildings
allows for smaller transformers,
smaller electric vaults, and less
amperage fees
REDUCED
CONSTRUCTION COST
1
PowerFlex’s smart chargers allow
charging stations to accurately
charge customers for power used
to charge EVs
POTENTIAL CASH FLOW
2
Monitored charging allows owners
to bill customers directly and to
track building and EV charging
statistics. Minimums apply
MONITORED CHARGING
3
Estimated Costs for Electrical Infrastructure
Less than 5 EVSE = $ 1000 per EVSE
5 EVSE – 10 EVSE = $ 3000 per EVSE
More than 10 EVSE = $10,000 per EVSE
Caltech Garage Pasadena, CA -71 chargers
EVSE Installation Costs Can Rise
Exponentially
Adaptive Load Balancing
Intelligent Energy Management
• Utilizes Personal Charging Profiles to schedule
charging sessions
• Continuously monitors and adapts to changing energy
demands
• Eliminates the need for expensive electrical system
upgrades
Standard Max Rate Charging
EV2
2 5
EV1
0 (arrival) 13(departure)
EV3
3 10
0
COMBINED
power capacity exceeded
58% of the time
2 3 135 10
demand flexibility wasted
Dynamic Load Balancing
EV3
3 10
EV2
2 5
0 13
EV1 (arrival) (departure)
0
EV2: 39% charged
COMBINED
EV3: 84% charged
2 3 135 10
demand flexibility wasted
Adaptive Load Balancing
3
EV3
Delayed charging
10
0 2 3 13
• power limit not exceeded
• all EVs 100% charged (flexibility fully utilized)
COMBINED
5 10
2 5
EV2 0 13EV1 (arrival) (departure)
Delayed charging Reduced charging
ALB Levels Demand Spikes
6am 6pm
Source: Google Simulation May 2016 – Dec 2016
LMC & CHARGER
Smart CHARGERLMC Box
What are they?
Allows chargers to communicate with the
LMC, charge EV owners for power
consumption, and effectively charge EVs in
accordance with customer demands.
FEATURES:
• Advanced Load Management
Capabilities
• WiFi or ZigBee network options
• Industry standard SAE-J1772 connector
• Americans with disabilities Ast (ADA)
compliant installation
• Integrated cable storage
• Underwriters Laboratory (UL) listed
• Breakaway safety cable
• Optional pedestal mount configurations
Controls and allocates power from the building to
the electric vehicle (EV) chargers. Allows for
monitoring of power in the building and monitoring
of the smart chargers.
FEATURES:
• Communications via cellular or hardwired
Ethernet
• Supports either Zigbee or WiFi equipped EVSE
• Intel Core i5-6300U, 2.4Ghz processor with
500GB SSD and 32GB of RAM
• 120VAC – 240VAC
• Max power consumption 50W
• 40 lbs
• 19.5 x 17.5 x 10 inches
• Molded fiberglass reinforced polyester enclosure
• NEMA Type 3R, 3RX/IP 24 rated
• Thermostat controlled heating and cooling
• ETL certified
wireless & wireline netwo
control &
optimization
(LMC)
WiFi or
Zigbee
Cell or Cat 5
Network
Local Control Reduces Communications
Expense
Control &
Optimization
(LMC)
Hamilton Apts. Los Altos, CA
Jet Propulsion Labs Pasadena, CA
CONTACT US
Peter@Northwestpartnersllc.com
2815 Eastlake Ave E
Seattle, WA 98102
NW Partners Seattle Office

Adaptive Charging Network, Peter Viethaler

  • 1.
  • 2.
    OUR GARAGES arethe Gas Stations of the FUTURE
  • 3.
    Where and HowWill Drivers Charge? Our Garages are the Gas Stations of the Future EV owners want to be able to charge in convenient locations on extended trips ON THE GO Drivers want to charge at home and at work LOCATION Many drivers depend on leaving their cars overnight for their next day commute CHARGE TIME 3
  • 4.
    It’s not TOOmuch of a trip hazard. . . . .
  • 5.
    . . .. . Right?
  • 6.
    PowerFlex A New Paradigm Mountainview Highschool-Los Altos School District
  • 7.
    BENEFITS of PowerFlex InfrastructureCost Reduces the power required to new buildings and eliminates the need for the addition of new power to existing buildings Charger Installation Cost Charging stations and monitoring are much less than the cost of traditional electric vehicle charging stations. Design Flexibility Three different levels of installation designed to meet your budget and flexible options for charging customers Load Management By monitoring a building’s power and consumption, PowerFlex reduces peak power while charging up to 100 vehicles.
  • 8.
    SAVE MONEY With PowerFlex Withless electric service capacity needed for new and existing buildings, Powerflex saves money for developers and owners. With full installation, PowerFlex can cost up to 35% less than traditional EV charging systems and allow for 100 vehicles to be charged simultaneously Less power needed for buildings allows for smaller transformers, smaller electric vaults, and less amperage fees REDUCED CONSTRUCTION COST 1 PowerFlex’s smart chargers allow charging stations to accurately charge customers for power used to charge EVs POTENTIAL CASH FLOW 2 Monitored charging allows owners to bill customers directly and to track building and EV charging statistics. Minimums apply MONITORED CHARGING 3
  • 9.
    Estimated Costs forElectrical Infrastructure Less than 5 EVSE = $ 1000 per EVSE 5 EVSE – 10 EVSE = $ 3000 per EVSE More than 10 EVSE = $10,000 per EVSE Caltech Garage Pasadena, CA -71 chargers EVSE Installation Costs Can Rise Exponentially
  • 10.
    Adaptive Load Balancing IntelligentEnergy Management • Utilizes Personal Charging Profiles to schedule charging sessions • Continuously monitors and adapts to changing energy demands • Eliminates the need for expensive electrical system upgrades
  • 11.
    Standard Max RateCharging EV2 2 5 EV1 0 (arrival) 13(departure) EV3 3 10 0 COMBINED power capacity exceeded 58% of the time 2 3 135 10 demand flexibility wasted
  • 12.
    Dynamic Load Balancing EV3 310 EV2 2 5 0 13 EV1 (arrival) (departure) 0 EV2: 39% charged COMBINED EV3: 84% charged 2 3 135 10 demand flexibility wasted
  • 13.
    Adaptive Load Balancing 3 EV3 Delayedcharging 10 0 2 3 13 • power limit not exceeded • all EVs 100% charged (flexibility fully utilized) COMBINED 5 10 2 5 EV2 0 13EV1 (arrival) (departure) Delayed charging Reduced charging
  • 14.
    ALB Levels DemandSpikes 6am 6pm Source: Google Simulation May 2016 – Dec 2016
  • 15.
    LMC & CHARGER SmartCHARGERLMC Box What are they? Allows chargers to communicate with the LMC, charge EV owners for power consumption, and effectively charge EVs in accordance with customer demands. FEATURES: • Advanced Load Management Capabilities • WiFi or ZigBee network options • Industry standard SAE-J1772 connector • Americans with disabilities Ast (ADA) compliant installation • Integrated cable storage • Underwriters Laboratory (UL) listed • Breakaway safety cable • Optional pedestal mount configurations Controls and allocates power from the building to the electric vehicle (EV) chargers. Allows for monitoring of power in the building and monitoring of the smart chargers. FEATURES: • Communications via cellular or hardwired Ethernet • Supports either Zigbee or WiFi equipped EVSE • Intel Core i5-6300U, 2.4Ghz processor with 500GB SSD and 32GB of RAM • 120VAC – 240VAC • Max power consumption 50W • 40 lbs • 19.5 x 17.5 x 10 inches • Molded fiberglass reinforced polyester enclosure • NEMA Type 3R, 3RX/IP 24 rated • Thermostat controlled heating and cooling • ETL certified
  • 16.
    wireless & wirelinenetwo control & optimization (LMC) WiFi or Zigbee Cell or Cat 5 Network Local Control Reduces Communications Expense Control & Optimization (LMC)
  • 17.
    Hamilton Apts. LosAltos, CA Jet Propulsion Labs Pasadena, CA
  • 18.
    CONTACT US Peter@Northwestpartnersllc.com 2815 EastlakeAve E Seattle, WA 98102 NW Partners Seattle Office

Editor's Notes

  • #10 The transformer capacity is 7.2 kW (25 kW shared between 4 houses). Each car can charge at a peak rate of 7.2 kW. Therefore all three cars charging at their peak rate will exceed the transformer limit.   The demo will run over 12.7 minutes with the following scenario: Three cars will be plugged in at different times with different energy demands and departure times: Car 1: arrives at time 0, departs at time 11 mins, needs 0.71 kWh. (takes 5.9 mins at 7.2kW) Car 2: arrives at time 2 mins, departs at 5 mins, needs 0.36 kWh. (takes 3 mins at 7.2kW) Car 3: arrives at time 3 mins, departs at 10 mins, needs 0.45 kWh. (takes 3.75 min at 7.2kW)   The scenario is designed to illustrate the importance of smart charging (and other system functions; see below): Dumb charging where each car charges at its peak will exceed transformer limit. Static sharing policy will not satisfy EV energy demands. Only dynamic adaptation based on real-time information can work, as shown in the diagram below.  
  • #11 The transformer capacity is 7.2 kW (25 kW shared between 4 houses). Each car can charge at a peak rate of 7.2 kW. Therefore all three cars charging at their peak rate will exceed the transformer limit.   The demo will run over 12.7 minutes with the following scenario: Three cars will be plugged in at different times with different energy demands and departure times: Car 1: arrives at time 0, departs at time 11 mins, needs 0.71 kWh. (takes 5.9 mins at 7.2kW) Car 2: arrives at time 2 mins, departs at 5 mins, needs 0.36 kWh. (takes 3 mins at 7.2kW) Car 3: arrives at time 3 mins, departs at 10 mins, needs 0.45 kWh. (takes 3.75 min at 7.2kW)   The scenario is designed to illustrate the importance of smart charging (and other system functions; see below): Dumb charging where each car charges at its peak will exceed transformer limit. Static sharing policy will not satisfy EV energy demands. Only dynamic adaptation based on real-time information can work, as shown in the diagram below.  
  • #12 The transformer capacity is 7.2 kW (25 kW shared between 4 houses). Each car can charge at a peak rate of 7.2 kW. Therefore all three cars charging at their peak rate will exceed the transformer limit.   The demo will run over 12.7 minutes with the following scenario: Three cars will be plugged in at different times with different energy demands and departure times: Car 1: arrives at time 0, departs at time 11 mins, needs 0.71 kWh. (takes 5.9 mins at 7.2kW) Car 2: arrives at time 2 mins, departs at 5 mins, needs 0.36 kWh. (takes 3 mins at 7.2kW) Car 3: arrives at time 3 mins, departs at 10 mins, needs 0.45 kWh. (takes 3.75 min at 7.2kW)   The scenario is designed to illustrate the importance of smart charging (and other system functions; see below): Dumb charging where each car charges at its peak will exceed transformer limit. Static sharing policy will not satisfy EV energy demands. Only dynamic adaptation based on real-time information can work, as shown in the diagram below.  
  • #13 The transformer capacity is 7.2 kW (25 kW shared between 4 houses). Each car can charge at a peak rate of 7.2 kW. Therefore all three cars charging at their peak rate will exceed the transformer limit.   The demo will run over 12.7 minutes with the following scenario: Three cars will be plugged in at different times with different energy demands and departure times: Car 1: arrives at time 0, departs at time 11 mins, needs 0.71 kWh. (takes 5.9 mins at 7.2kW) Car 2: arrives at time 2 mins, departs at 5 mins, needs 0.36 kWh. (takes 3 mins at 7.2kW) Car 3: arrives at time 3 mins, departs at 10 mins, needs 0.45 kWh. (takes 3.75 min at 7.2kW)   The scenario is designed to illustrate the importance of smart charging (and other system functions; see below): Dumb charging where each car charges at its peak will exceed transformer limit. Static sharing policy will not satisfy EV energy demands. Only dynamic adaptation based on real-time information can work, as shown in the diagram below.  
  • #14 The transformer capacity is 7.2 kW (25 kW shared between 4 houses). Each car can charge at a peak rate of 7.2 kW. Therefore all three cars charging at their peak rate will exceed the transformer limit.   The demo will run over 12.7 minutes with the following scenario: Three cars will be plugged in at different times with different energy demands and departure times: Car 1: arrives at time 0, departs at time 11 mins, needs 0.71 kWh. (takes 5.9 mins at 7.2kW) Car 2: arrives at time 2 mins, departs at 5 mins, needs 0.36 kWh. (takes 3 mins at 7.2kW) Car 3: arrives at time 3 mins, departs at 10 mins, needs 0.45 kWh. (takes 3.75 min at 7.2kW)   The scenario is designed to illustrate the importance of smart charging (and other system functions; see below): Dumb charging where each car charges at its peak will exceed transformer limit. Static sharing policy will not satisfy EV energy demands. Only dynamic adaptation based on real-time information can work, as shown in the diagram below.  
  • #15 The transformer capacity is 7.2 kW (25 kW shared between 4 houses). Each car can charge at a peak rate of 7.2 kW. Therefore all three cars charging at their peak rate will exceed the transformer limit.   The demo will run over 11 minutes with the following scenario: Three cars will be plugged in at different times with different energy demands and departure times: Car 1: arrives at time 0, departs at time 11 mins, needs 0.71 kWh. Car 2: arrives at time 2 mins, departs at 5 mins, needs 0.36 kWh. Car 3: arrives at time 3 mins, departs at 8 mins, needs 0.25 kWh.   The scenario is designed to illustrate the importance of smart charging (and other system functions; see below): Dumb charging where each car charges at its peak will exceed transformer limit. Static sharing policy will not satisfy EV energy demands. Only dynamic adaptation based on real-time information can work, as shown in the diagram below.