This document discusses surplus liquidity management options for Valspar Group in China. It begins with an introduction to Valspar Group and its treasury operations in China. It then outlines traditional and new options for repatriating surplus cash from China, including dividends, royalties, service fees, offshore loans using onshore deposits as collateral, and cross-border loans and cash pooling. The document discusses the advantages and disadvantages of each option. It also reviews China's evolving regulatory environment regarding cross-border RMB transactions and the increasing flexibility provided by the Shanghai Free Trade Zone.
(1) An Overview of the NSFR Liquidity Framework; (2) Building NSFR into FTP Logic; (3) Integrating NSFR into FTP and Liquidity Management Systems; (4) FTP and NSFR: Strategic Considerations
(1) Diversified Funding: Problems with Steering Towards Long-Term Stable Funding; (2) Analysing the Best Internal Mechanism for Managing new Liquidity Requirements
This presentation discusses the impact of Basel III capital, liquidity, and reporting requirements on banking and non-banking organizations and what these organizations can do to prepare for the changes.
(1) An Overview of the NSFR Liquidity Framework; (2) Building NSFR into FTP Logic; (3) Integrating NSFR into FTP and Liquidity Management Systems; (4) FTP and NSFR: Strategic Considerations
(1) Diversified Funding: Problems with Steering Towards Long-Term Stable Funding; (2) Analysing the Best Internal Mechanism for Managing new Liquidity Requirements
This presentation discusses the impact of Basel III capital, liquidity, and reporting requirements on banking and non-banking organizations and what these organizations can do to prepare for the changes.
Basel Accords - Basel I, II, and III Advantages, limitations and contrastSyed Ashraf Ali
The Basel Accords is referred to the banking supervision Accords (recommendations on banking regulations). Basel I, Basel II and Basel III was issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS). They are called the Basel accords as the BCBS maintains its secretariat at the Bank for
International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland and the committee normally meets there. The Basel Accords is a set of
recommendations for regulations in the banking industry.
Financing Options for foreign companies in IndiaSAS Partners
Various funding options available for foreign investors to infuse the funds to their Indian investments. External Commercial Borrowing is one among the options which became highly attractive and beneficial to both the investors as well as the Indian entities pursuant to the recent liberalisation of policy. Corporates can broaden their funding plans considering the company-specific requirements.
A set of international banking regulations put forth by the Basel Committee on Bank Supervision, which set out the minimum capital requirements of financial institutions with the goal of minimizing credit risk. Banks that operate internationally are required to maintain a minimum amount (8%) of capital based on a percent of risk-weighted assets.
Basel norms were introduced by Basel Committee to have a standardized prudential norms for capital adequacy
The prudential norms defined components of capital, assigned risk weights to different types of assets and stipulated the minimum Capital Adequacy to aggregate Risk weighted Assets (CRAR)
The minimum standard of capital to be kept with commercial banks was fixed 8% of RWA under Basel 1 & Basel 2 norms which was increased to 9% of RWA under Basel 3
Capital Adequacy Ratio-
Capital adequacy ratio is the ratio of the banks capital to its risk-weighted assets
The capital adequacy of banks is assessed based on the following three aspect –
Composition of capital
Composition of risk-weighted assets
Assigning risk-weights
Basel 1
Came into effect in the year 1988
Focused majorly on credit risk
Minimum capital requirement was set 8% to be achieved by the end of 1992 and it applied to all G10 countries
However later on several non-G10 countries also adopted the same
Objectives of Basel 1 accord were : To strengthen the soundness and stability of banking system and to have high degree of consistency across the banks
Basel 2
Came into effect in the year 2006
Focused on all sort of credit risk, market risk and operational risk
Minimum capital requirement set remained same as in Basel 1 at 8%
Provided for better risk management practices and advised bank on using internal systems for assessment of risks
Supervisors were advised to take suitable approaches for efficiency of bank
Basel 3
Banks are required to maintain a minimum of Pillar 1 Capital to Risk weighted Assets Ratio of 9% on a continuous basis.
For assessment of capital charge for credit risk banks have to mandatory obtain credit rating from credit rating agencies approved by RBI.
NPA management procedures implemented through classification of loan assets as standard, sub-standard, doubtful and loss assets.
Thank You For Watching
Subscribe to DevTech Finance
MTBiz is for you if you are looking for contemporary information on business, economy and especially on banking industry of Bangladesh. You would also find periodical information on Global Economy and Commodity Markets.
Signature content of MTBiz is its Article of the Month (AoM), as depicted on Cover Page of each issue, with featured focus on different issues that fall into the wide definition of Market, Business, Organization and Leadership. The AoM also covers areas on Innovation, Central Banking, Monetary Policy, National Budget, Economic Depression or Growth and Capital Market. Scale of coverage of the AoM both, global and local subject to each issue.
MTBiz is a monthly Market Review produced and distributed by Group R&D, MTB since 2009.
RBI (Transfer of Loan Exposures) Directions have been issued in exercise of the powers conferred by the Sections 21 and 35A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 read with Section 56 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949; Chapter IIIB of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934; and Sections 30A, 32 and 33 of the National Housing Bank Act, 1987
penerbitan sbsn dan pengaturannya, mekanisme dasar penerbitan sbsn, bentuk mekanisme penjualan/pembelian sbsn, pengaturan dan pengawasan sbsn, perbedaan/persamaan sbsn dan sun
Basel Accords - Basel I, II, and III Advantages, limitations and contrastSyed Ashraf Ali
The Basel Accords is referred to the banking supervision Accords (recommendations on banking regulations). Basel I, Basel II and Basel III was issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS). They are called the Basel accords as the BCBS maintains its secretariat at the Bank for
International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland and the committee normally meets there. The Basel Accords is a set of
recommendations for regulations in the banking industry.
Financing Options for foreign companies in IndiaSAS Partners
Various funding options available for foreign investors to infuse the funds to their Indian investments. External Commercial Borrowing is one among the options which became highly attractive and beneficial to both the investors as well as the Indian entities pursuant to the recent liberalisation of policy. Corporates can broaden their funding plans considering the company-specific requirements.
A set of international banking regulations put forth by the Basel Committee on Bank Supervision, which set out the minimum capital requirements of financial institutions with the goal of minimizing credit risk. Banks that operate internationally are required to maintain a minimum amount (8%) of capital based on a percent of risk-weighted assets.
Basel norms were introduced by Basel Committee to have a standardized prudential norms for capital adequacy
The prudential norms defined components of capital, assigned risk weights to different types of assets and stipulated the minimum Capital Adequacy to aggregate Risk weighted Assets (CRAR)
The minimum standard of capital to be kept with commercial banks was fixed 8% of RWA under Basel 1 & Basel 2 norms which was increased to 9% of RWA under Basel 3
Capital Adequacy Ratio-
Capital adequacy ratio is the ratio of the banks capital to its risk-weighted assets
The capital adequacy of banks is assessed based on the following three aspect –
Composition of capital
Composition of risk-weighted assets
Assigning risk-weights
Basel 1
Came into effect in the year 1988
Focused majorly on credit risk
Minimum capital requirement was set 8% to be achieved by the end of 1992 and it applied to all G10 countries
However later on several non-G10 countries also adopted the same
Objectives of Basel 1 accord were : To strengthen the soundness and stability of banking system and to have high degree of consistency across the banks
Basel 2
Came into effect in the year 2006
Focused on all sort of credit risk, market risk and operational risk
Minimum capital requirement set remained same as in Basel 1 at 8%
Provided for better risk management practices and advised bank on using internal systems for assessment of risks
Supervisors were advised to take suitable approaches for efficiency of bank
Basel 3
Banks are required to maintain a minimum of Pillar 1 Capital to Risk weighted Assets Ratio of 9% on a continuous basis.
For assessment of capital charge for credit risk banks have to mandatory obtain credit rating from credit rating agencies approved by RBI.
NPA management procedures implemented through classification of loan assets as standard, sub-standard, doubtful and loss assets.
Thank You For Watching
Subscribe to DevTech Finance
MTBiz is for you if you are looking for contemporary information on business, economy and especially on banking industry of Bangladesh. You would also find periodical information on Global Economy and Commodity Markets.
Signature content of MTBiz is its Article of the Month (AoM), as depicted on Cover Page of each issue, with featured focus on different issues that fall into the wide definition of Market, Business, Organization and Leadership. The AoM also covers areas on Innovation, Central Banking, Monetary Policy, National Budget, Economic Depression or Growth and Capital Market. Scale of coverage of the AoM both, global and local subject to each issue.
MTBiz is a monthly Market Review produced and distributed by Group R&D, MTB since 2009.
RBI (Transfer of Loan Exposures) Directions have been issued in exercise of the powers conferred by the Sections 21 and 35A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 read with Section 56 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949; Chapter IIIB of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934; and Sections 30A, 32 and 33 of the National Housing Bank Act, 1987
penerbitan sbsn dan pengaturannya, mekanisme dasar penerbitan sbsn, bentuk mekanisme penjualan/pembelian sbsn, pengaturan dan pengawasan sbsn, perbedaan/persamaan sbsn dan sun
27.10.2016 г. Семинар компании Аккаунтор и АО "Райффайзенбанк" на тему "Хеджирование валютных рисков и управление ликвидностью в России". Презентация Екатерины Лапшонковой, старшего вице-президента группы развития продуктов по управлению ликвидностью АО «Райффайзенбанк»
Tata Cara Ikut Tax Amnesty untuk Pegawai atau Karyawan baik Negeri maupun Swasta dan Pengecualian Objek Amnesti Pajak, untuk Konsultasi 0812-1917-9800 (telkomsel)
MPN Billing System | 3 Cara Pembuatan ID Billing Surat Setoran Pajak ElektronikDeny Zaenal Faizin
Cara pembayaran pajak melalui pembuatan kode billing melalui internet atau intranet. Ini merupakan generasi kedua dari pembayaran pajak yang wajib mulai berlaku sejak tanggal 1 Juli 2016
Contoh penerapan PTKP baru dalam perhitungan PPh Pasal 21, simulasi perhitungan pajak atas Pembelian Barang dan Sewa Gedung, untuk perhitungan lebih lanjut hubungi 0812-1917-9800 (Telkomsel)
The BRICS proposals establish two separate institutions, the Contingency Reserve Arrangement (CRA) and the New Development Bank (NDB)
The CRA is a virtual institution whereas the NDB will be an institution that will be established
The NDB will have its headquarters in Shanghai and a regional office in Johannesburg
What is the context of these proposals?
Major gap in development finance to fund long-term infrastructure and sustainable development
The departure by US from expansionary fiscal policy led to large outflows from emerging economies and significant decline in exchange rates
This experience indicated potential vulnerability of emerging economies to shocks emanating from developed countries
Greensill Capital Investor Presentation Deck March 2016.pdfBryann Alexandros
Greensill Capital was a financial services company based in the UK and Australia. It specialized in providing supply chain financing and related services. The company was founded in 2011 by Lex Greensill, a former banker and adviser to the UK government. It claimed to have revolutionized the way businesses pay their suppliers and access working capital. It had over 1,000 clients and 5 million suppliers in 175 countries by 2020. However, Greensill Capital failed in March 2021 after losing its main insurer and facing a liquidity crisis. The company was accused of misrepresenting its assets, overexposing itself to a single client (GFG Alliance), and engaging in questionable practices such as reverse factoring and future receivables. The company filed for insolvency protection on 8 March 2021 and was sold to Apollo Global Management for $60 million134. The failure of Greensill Capital triggered a series of investigations, lawsuits, and scandals involving its investors (such as Credit Suisse and SoftBank), its customers (such as GFG Alliance and Sanjeev Gupta), its regulators (such as the UK Financial Conduct Authority and the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority), and its lobbyists (such as former UK Prime Minister David Cameron).
Similar to ACT 2014 - Managing excess liqudiity in China (20)
2. Page 2
Agenda
Part Topic
1 About Valspar Group and China
2 Surplus Liquidity Repatriation Channels
(Traditional vs New Options )
3 Investment Options in China
4 Lessons Learned
3.
4. Page 4
VALSPAR Group
Established in 1806, headquartered in Minneapolis, USA
Fifth largest Paints and Coatings Company in the World
Over US$ 4 billion Turnover in 2013
9,500 employees in over 25 countries
5. Page 5
China Treasury Reform Roadmap
Fully centralized Treasury Centre in Shunde.
Cash management (pooling, investing excess cash,
fund transfer to ensure sufficient cash for payment ,
forecasting ).
Full range of treasury support to China entities such
as daily payments, trade finance (Bank Acceptance
draft , LC, DA, bank guarantee etc…), custom duty ,
FX etc.
Regional support to other Asia countries (Singapore,
Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam, etc.)
Tianjin
Shunde
Shanghai
Dongguan
Hong Kong
Centralized
Treasury
Operation
Business case SSC /
Bank bidding SSC project
Site / BU finance
Mid 2012 to date
Set up shared services /
Upgrade Cash pool / H2H
2011/2012
Valspar in China
1996 - 2010 2010/2011
2008
First China
Cash pool
Totally 6 manufacture plants. Located in
Shanghai, Dongguan, Tianjin and Shunde.
Regionally headquartered in Shanghai.
Treasury Operation
7. Page 7
Roadmap of China open-up in
Cross-border Liquidity Solutions
More flexible alternatives are now available
Before July 13
July13
onwards
Feb14
onwards
Limited ways for cash repatriation
Global liquidity solutions on pilot base
Cross border RMB Cash pool
Cross border RMB Pay & Collect on behalf
Expansion of RMB Cross-border Usage in SHFTA, PBOC SH Yin Zong Bu Fa [2014] 22, 20 Feb 2014
Cross border FX Cash pool / Cross border FX Pay & Collect on behalf (Open-up)
Implementation Rules of Foreign Exchange Administration Supporting China (Shanghai) Free Trade Zone
SAFE SH Hui Fa [2014] 26 , 28 Feb 2014
PBOC opinion on
providing financial
support for the
development of the
China (Shanghai) Free
Trade Zone (SHFTA) , 2
Dec. 13
8. Page 8
Surplus liquidity onshore
More flexible alternatives are now available
Pledge
RMB Standby Letter
of Credit
Onshore deposit Offshore loan
Dividend payment /
Royalty / Service fee
Credit
Facility
Payment from China to offshore entitles
Cross border loan/
Cross-border cash
pooling
Offshore Loan on
pledged local
deposits
(内保外贷)
2
3
(1) Dividend / Royalty/ service fee payments are subject to withholding tax, the rate for which varies from country to country.
Once paid, cannot flow Back .
(2) Offshore Financial Guarantee is subject to limited resources of China banks’ foreign debt quota.
(3) Interest charged on cross-border loan/physical pooling balance on arm’s length base and subject to China income tax
1
Onshore liquidity
Intra-Group Loan
Proceeds received offshore
Participation in global
liquidity structure
Increasingfrequency
Bank XYZ -
Onshore
branch
Bank XYZ -
Offshore
branch
2 way sweeping
Onshore Offshore
9. Page 9
Cross-Border Cash Pooling Via Shanghai Free Trade Zone
Sub
1 **
SFTZ leading
company’s RMB
special account
(Daily Zero balanced)
RMB Cash Pool
Leading entity **
Master Account
of Domestic
RMB Cash Pool
SFTZ Lead Entity
Sub
2 **
Sub
3 **
China
Singapore
HK
USA
Global Notional Pooling
Etc…
Subject to :
Total Available foreign debt quota =
Foreign debt quota – “registered” mid/long term Foreign borrowing –
“unpaid short term foreign borrowing
IFMA – International Foreign Currency Master Account
DFMA – Domestic Foreign Currency Master Account
** Entities can be inside or outside SHFTZ
RMB
FCY
RMB
FCY IFMADomestic
Particpiant ** -
FCY Account 1
SFTZ Lead Entity
DFMA
Domestic
Particpiant **
FCY Account 2
Pay Receipt
on behalf/
Netting
10. Page 10
Traditional channels to repatriate surplus liquidity
Channels Pros Cons
Dividend
Permanent repatriation of funds
of large sum at once
Once a year (maybe twice)
Withholding tax (10% or 5% for tax
treaty location)
Audited financial report is required
Royalty
Permanent repatriation of funds
with standard tax treatment (Vs
service fee)
Simplified document requirement
after Sep13
Withholding tax (10% or 5% for tax
treaty location)+ 6% business tax
Service fee
More flexible payment timing
Simplified process after Sep13 (<
USD 50,000)
Ongoing
CIT 25% on deemed profit 20-30% of
charging entity (effective tax rate
around 5% - 7.5%)
Needs to negotiate with Tax Bureau
on a case by case basis
Cannot do a lump sum transaction
11. Page 11
Flexible Cross border liquidity solutions ….
Channels Pros Cons
Offshore loan on
local pledged
deposits
(内保外贷)
Cash able to remain in China
Net gain on investing holding cash at higher
onshore rate & borrowing at lower (CNH/FCY)
offshore rate
To be renewed annual
Complex tax consideration if the borrower is US parent
Increase external loan balance of whole group
In RMB - No limitation for foreign debt quota of bank
Offshore CNH lending rate higher than FCY loan.
Limited use of RMB overseas (offshore notional pooling
may help)
In FCY - Lower FCY offshore borrowing rate than CNH
Need negotiate with banks for banks’ foreign debt quota
being limited resources
Cross-border
loan to offshore
affiliates
Only bank approval required, easy & quick
Flexible – allow auto sweeping & multiple draw-down
(up to the initial RMB loan amount)
Opportunity cost : loss of higher RMB onshore return
Limited to onshore groups with overall net positive profit
& operation cash inflow
In RMB – Higher quota limit than FCY loan, No regulatory
filing required (FCY cross border loan required)
Limited use of RMB overseas (overcome by offshore
notional pooling)
In FCY - Funding can come from external borrowing
(mainly used by local-capital entities without oversea bank
relationship).
Lower quota limit than cross border RMB loans
2-way cross-
border Physical
Cash pooling
via SHFTZ
Most flexible liquidity solution for global companies
Draw cheaper oversea funding to meet China needs
(inside & outside SHFTZ)
Limited to onshore groups with overall net positive profit
& operation cash inflow
More time & effort to work with bank on initial control
cap limit setup for fund inflow to China
In RMB – Higher quota limit than FCY cash pool
Limited use of RMB overseas (overcome by offshore
notional pooling)
In FCY – more common than CNH for use overseas
“Available Foreign debt quota” on inflow funding for
usage outside SHFTZ & lower quota for outflow to
oversea
Need register foreign debit with SAFE for each
oversea fund inflow to SHFTZ
12. Page 12
FCY cross border
pooling via SHFTZ
FCY cross border loan
RMB Cross border
pooling via SHFTZ
RMB cross border loan
Approval
process
Filing with SAFE(SH)
**(If no objection from SAFE
within 20 days, then start…..)
SAFE approval
(SHFTZ – filing with SAFE)
Bank approval Bank approval
Lender
Eligibility
MNC with entity at FTZ
No breach in last 3 yrs
Grade A enterprises
No special requirement
MNC with entity at FTZ
(Unofficially - Capital fully
injected + financial
requirements same to RMB
cross border loan)
No official requirements.
Local PBOC interpretation -
Positive profit;
Positive net assets;
Positive cash inflow (Ex
financing)
in last preceding year.
Participants Related company
Oversea Parent Co /
subsidiaries
Related companies Related companies
Lending
Limit
50% of equity (Net
assets) of all
participants
Lower of 30% equity & Share
of undistributed profits +
dividend payable (SHFTZ
Lender - 50% of equity)
No formal quota
(PBOC SH interpretation:
consolidated income from
operation & investment)
No formal quota (norm is
Net equity subject to city-
specific guideline)
Lending
Tenor
Flexible 2 years (renewable) Flexible
No official limit – matching
the loan purpose
Lending
fund source
No formal restriction Borrowing or self funding
Self generated operating
fund ; Not from bank loans
Self fund from Cash pool
members (or one entity)
Borrowing
limit &
tenor
Available foreign debt quota
=All participants‘ foreign debt
quota – (registered) mid/ long
term foreign borrowing –
(unpaid) ST foreign
borrowing ; Tenor : flexible
Foreign debt quota
Tenor : can be > or < 1 yr
No official quota ; bank’s
Interpretation : meet real
business needs , cap limit
at consolidated expenses
Tenor : flexible
• Foreign debt quota
• SHFTZ borrower - can
select Paid-in capital x
adjustment factor (now 100%)
but tenor need be > 1 yr &
use of fund limited within
SHFTZ for operation or
oversea project )
Cross border liquidity solutions - lesser restriction / Openness
13. Page 13
Changing China Regulatory environment
Different approach in New rules of SHFTZ
SAFE (FCY)- Clear quota limit, although relaxed, still strong control, close monitoring
PBOC (RMB) – No official quota & flexibility, Encourage cross border RMB
Trend on the role of regulators & banks -
More rely on banks’ “Know your client”, “Know your business”, “Due diligence”
Regulators : Pre-Transaction approval control => Post-transactional monitoring
Flexibility on Cross border RMB loan /cash pooling –
Invisible rule behind
Enterprise can get different answers on quota limit etc… for :
Different interpretation of PBOC at city level
Different understanding of banks on training / oral guidance from PBOC
Different Risk aptitude of banks
Regulator may step in if any abuse (Principle is to serve real economy)
Implications & future developments :
Principle-oriented guidance will likely evolve into a “norm” of more clear cap limit
Still flexible to over cap limit if any justifications (Enterprises to prove it), as more
practical and executable to the banks & clearer to enterprises
Large MNC banks of closer relationship with regulator may have advantages, before
new rules become mature
Setup entity in SHFTZ now or wait…. Rules on Cross-border cash pool still new / May
have more FTZ coming…
14. Page 14
Cross Border RMB Loan
A ready-to-use tool to share surplus liquidity in China
Fast implementation time : 2-3 months
Post pilot stage - Quick approval by banks
Many live cases since July 2013
Allow multiple drawdowns and repayments
A breakthrough of open-up reform
Enterprises with profit and positive cash inflow generated from operations &
investing activities is free to share liquidity with offshore
Allow sharing of onshore liquidity to a very deep extent
Bank assessment bases on audited report of preceding year
Unofficial quota limit of Net equity
Illustration…...
Cross-border loan Vs dividend
Re-think rationale for annual dividend …
Can improve annual bottom-line to foreign MNC
Illustration…...
Impact to MNC banks’ deposit
Faster & more cash repatriation of MNC client
15. Page 15
Illustration I : Depth of liquidity sharing with offshore
Interestingly, in certain scenarios, there is chance to reduce cash balance to a
level less than capital.
For profitable entities, may be used for faster capital funding withdrawal upon
exit from China market, instead of idle capital funding sitting in China during
long liquidation process.
16. Page 16
Illustration II : Cross Border RMB Loan VS Dividend
For those corporations holding long-term strategy & interest in China market, may
consider cross border RMB loan to share surplus liquidity / cash generated from
China business in replacement of annual dividend. Can benefit with a net tax
saving. For example :
Annual Dividend US$ 50 million
Dividend Withholding Tax = US$2.5 million (5% preferential tax treaty rate)
Tax on Interest income of cross border RMB loan
= US$50 million x 3.4% Int’** x ( 5% business tax + 25% EIT)
= US$50 million x 1% approx.
= US$0.5 million
** assume use oversea CNH loan rate as transfer price
Entrustment loan bank commission = 50 million x 0.1% = US$0.05 million
(PS: Trend of bank commission is once off, lower or even free. Talk to more banks ! )
Net saving at bottom line / ST cash outflow for tax = US$ 1.95 million
Re-think : If cash can really be moved freely & easily cross-border at arm’s length
interest now, re-consider rationale to pay out dividend payout annually.
Other considerations : eg. Uncertainty in China policy in tax, banking &
monetary policy ; sovereign risk ; chance to exit China market etc…
18. Page 18
Regional Perspective - Investing Surplus Cash
YIELDLIQUIDITY
Rating by
International credit
agents (MMF / Banks)
Principal guaranteed
by banks
Diversification
Meet Business &
operation needs with
certainty
Redemption
frequency / Length
of Notice
Cash pool supported
by OD line
Maximize yield on
condition of
Security & liquidity
Principle
AVAILABILITY
Easy to subscribe
E-platform/ paper
based
Money Market
Collective
Investment
scheme need
subscribe via local
banks
Referral from corporate HQ
Local banks need establish relationship with HQ to enhance understanding
CORPORATE POLICY /
RELATIONSHIP & COMMUNICATION WITH HEADQUARTER
Secure support of Bank Acceptance Draft facility and on-site services from local banks
LOCAL BANK RELATIONSHIP / FACILITY SUPPORT
SECURITY
19. Page 19
Investment Options for Corporate Treasury
Instruments Tenor
Yield **
(p.a.)
Comments
Bank deposits
1 day call
Contract deposit,
7 days call
3 mth, 1 yr etc.
0.8%,
1.15%
1.35%
2.6%
3%
• Regulatory ceiling limit of deposit rates
• Bank can offer max. 10% up from ceiling rate
Wealth
Management
Products *
3-7 days, 1 mth, 3
mth, 6 mth, 1 yr
etc.
2.2% to
slightly
over 5%
• Commonly offered by Local banks
• Differentiate Principal-protected or Non-Principle-
protected low risk Products
• the later is not transparent off-balance sheet products
• Return % normally is certain at the time of subscription.
Structured
deposits *
7 days, 14 days, 3
wks, 1 mth, 2 mth,
3 mth, etc.
2.2% to
4.5%
• Offered by foreign banks and local banks
• Return subject to outcome of “event”.
• Principal and minimum return guaranteed.
Money Market
Fund MMF
Daily
(T+1 or T+2)
3.0% to
5% +
Rated by local credit rating agency only or
also by international credit rating agency.
* Only low-risk Principle-protected products are discussed here
* * Being market indicative rates obtained via 3 foreign banks and 3 local State/commercial banks only at late 2013
20. Page 20
China Wealth Management Products (WMP)
Should differentiate WHP which are …..
Principal guaranteed by banks :
• Subject to monitoring of bank regulations like provision charges, capital weighting etc.
• Nature similar to Principal-protected structured deposits – tie to banks’ ability of repayment
Non-Principal guaranteed by banks or Products of trust companies sold via
banks’ retail channel :
• Off balance sheets of Banks
• A large portion of such WMP invested in interbank and monetary markets according to
Government source
• Certain WMP invest in risky non-standard debt-based instruments (NSD), utilized as
channels to escape regulatory controls upon financing projects restricted by the Government
(e.g. property development) or to medium-size enterprises which hardly to obtain loan from
banks via trust companies, finance companies etc..
• Certain WHP form part of China shadow banking system - This segment of WHP poses
major risk to banking system
21. Page 21
China Wealth Management Products (WMP)
Regulatory controls tightened in 2013 :
Both the industry and China regulators realized the loopholes and
potential risk caused to the country financial system since 2012
CBRC New Circular Yin kan fa [2013] No.8 issued at early 2013
• All new WMP need be separately accounted for with own BS, P&L, cash flow
• Banks need to make risk assessment and provision for existing issued WMP
like other balance sheets assets by end of calendar 2013
• To cap investments of WMP fund in risky “non-standard” credit assets (less
liquid and not publicly traded) at the lower of 35 % of all funds raised from
the sales of wealth-management products, or 4 % of total assets.
• To stop pooling assets and to isolate the risks of such investments from their
own operations.
22. Page 22
China Wealth Management Products (WMP)
Views and Recommendations….
Government tightened control is good news to ensure healthy development of WMP
sector, stability of country banking system and avoid systematic risk
For MNC that have to keep certain level of deposits in local banks (eg. For securing
issuance of Bank Acceptance Draft and other services) –
Principal-guaranteed & liquid (redeemable) WMP is a choice, instead of deposits.
Both bear the same counter-party risk
Value of local / regional treasury : Provide insight to headquarter for wiser
decision and facilitate communication between local banks and oversea HQ
Proper risk management :
Stick to principal-protected products
Select products from top-tier banks that are too large to fail to China
23. Page 23
Structured Deposit
Nowadays, it’s a common products offered by Foreign banks and some
local commercial banks
To some extent, being foreign banks’ version of WMP to broaden deposit
base
Typical Terms to MNC clients :
Principal-guaranteed
Minimum Interest return guaranteed
Bonus rate if the linked index or commodity price stay within a
specified range during the deposit tenor
Linked with 1 mth USD LIBOR, 3 mth USD LIBOR etc..
24. Page 24
Money Market Funds (MMF) in China
First choice to corporate treasury for major benefits of MMF :
Highly liquid (T+1 or T+2), transparent and hence ideal for cash
management
Lower counter party risk : Invested asset units kept under
separate assets custodian, separate from fund manager &
custodian assets. Risk depends on invested instrument.
Diversification and convenient access to a variety of low-risk
investment instruments in interbank market and financial markets
with potential higher return than normal deposits & counter-party
risks diversified.
High quality China MMF typically invested in high concentration of low risk
& liquid Central Bank notes, Policy bank bonds, Ministry of Finance bonds,
Repo etc…
25. Page 25
Money Market Funds (MMF) in China
MMF with AAA rating from Fitch / CCXR Moody's AAA in China: (As at Nov 13)
• Goldman Sachs / Gao Hua Sheng Yu Money Market Collective Investment Scheme
(CIS);
• MMF with foreign capital JV -
• Deutsche Bank / Harvest Prime Liquidity Money Market Fund;
• BNP Paribas/HFT Liquid Money Market Fund;
• JP Morgan / China International Fund Management Money Market Fund (CIFM);
• HSBC / Jin Trust Money Market Fund;
• Invesco Greatwall
MMF VS CIS in China
• Legal status: CIS is under a Security Company while MMF is under a Fund management
company.
• Subscription process: CIS needs a local bank but MMF does not. (Lower availability)
• Tax treatment of income : MMF is under new Fund Law and income is exempted from
tax . No regulation of tax covers CIS. Tax treatment not 100% certain for CIS and need to
check with local tax bureau.
• Publicity : CIS can’t promote publicly
26. Page 26
Observations on the 2014 China market liquidity and
implications ….
2014 year starts with very tight liquidity compared to 2013 same period
Foreign banks – Note possible impact from cross border RMB loan
SHLIOR O/N & 1 week dropped after the end of Chinese new year (Early Feb14 ) but
discounting rate of Bank Acceptance Draft at local banks is still at a quite high level
(most 6 – 8%), although there is also some relaxation.
Local banks – With more regulating on shadow banking, higher demand for official
bank loans and very limit quota for private enterprises.
China MMF performance in 2014 will likely be better than 2013 – Local banks take
time to correct the mistakes of past mismatching in financing long term project with
short term WMP and continue to make “Repo” with MMF
Both banks and enterprises need to exercise stricter credit control
27. Page 27
Lessons Learned…..
For MNC , insist on benchmarking with Market upon negotiation
with relationship banks for proper products – Talk to more banks .
To some banks, cash management division may not be
keen to sell MMF as not count its performance.
Communication with corporate HQ & get trust is crucial -
Direct communication of local banks with oversea HQ
where possible
Guideline, Interpretation and risk appetite can vary largely
among cities SAFE/PBOC and even among banks – Talk to more
banks & try different locations
Importance of strong integrity to Treasury Team under
China environment. Clear and transparent internal guideline on
investment.
28. Page 28
Appendix
Comparison of annual returns on MMF Vs deposits
Movement of China MMF
Key consideration for MMF selection
.
29. Page 29
Money Market Funds (MMF)
0.35%
1.35%
2.30%
1.60%
2.50%
0.47%
1.46%
3.28%
2.77%
3.41%
0.48%
1.47%
3.45%
2.88%
4.17%
0.35%
1.35%
3.00%
3.48%
4.46%
0.00%
0.50%
1.00%
1.50%
2.00%
2.50%
3.00%
3.50%
4.00%
4.50%
5.00%
Bank current rate Bank 7d call
deposit rate
Bank 1y rate High quality local
MMF*
Local MMF*
2010 2011 2012 2013
• Source: WIND. Bank Rate: PBoC. High quality local MMF* are money market funds rated as AAA by one or more international
ratings agencies. Local MMF* referred herein not include high quality local money market funds.
•2010-2013 data is averaged yield of relevant year.
•Yields quoted are gross and do not reflect the deduction of any fees.
30. Page 30
Source of MMF: Wind (Chinese version of
Bloomberg for MMF)
The above figures relate to the past and past
performance should not be seen as an indication of
future performance.; Settlement : T+1 Net return
Source of BADD : www.chinacp.com.cn中国票据网
Movement of China MMF
MMF movement in
2014 likely
continue at a level
better than 2013
after CNY
0.0000
1.0000
2.0000
3.0000
4.0000
5.0000
6.0000
7.0000
8.0000
9.0000
10.0000
%
SHLIOR - O/N SHLIOR - 1W HSBC Jintrust MMF
SHLIOR dropped to a low
level after CNY
Bank Acceptance Draft
Discounting (BADD) rate
still maintained at a high
level after CNY, despite of
slightly adjusting
downwards
31. Page 31
Key Consideration for Money Market Funds
What are the underlying assets of the fund? Which guideline does it follow?
CSRC* CCXR** (Moody JV in China) US 2a-7 *** FITCH Chinese AAA MMF****
Maximum WAM ^ 180days 120 days 60days 75days
Maximum WAL^^ None 120 days 120days 120days
Maximum Asset
Maturity 1 year for Deposits, Repo, Gov bills ;
397 days for Bonds
1 year for Deposits, Repo, Gov bills ;
397 days for Bonds
397days&45days for tier 2 securities
& no limit for government FRN
397days&36months for qualified FRNs
Minimum Credit
Rating
Minimum AAA local currency rating
(not equivalent to a global AAA
rating)
Minimum AAA local currency rating
(not equivalent to a global AAA
rating)
1st tier security
(‘F1+’/‘F1’,‘A1+’/‘A1’,P1 or
equivalent)
2nd tier security (‘F2’,‘A2’,‘P2’ or
equivalent) if security maturity
<45 days and total 2nd tier
exposure <3%. Max individual
exposure is 0.5%
A- /F2(global rating)
Maximum assets
weighting
30% for licensed custodian bank,
5% for non-custodian bank
No limit for Agency bank bonds,
repos
20% for floating rate notes
30% for licensed custodian bank,
5% for non-custodian bank
No limit for Agency bank bonds,
repos
20% for floating rate notes
No limit for government securities
100% for MOF, PBoC and Exchanges
exposure
50% of NAV for any single policy bank issuer
35% of NAV for single issue by MOF or PBoC
25% of NAV for single exchange repo
(exchange as counterparty)
15% of NAV for single issue by any policy bank
Stress test None Detailed guidance Monthly No Specific Requirement
* CSRC – The China Securities Regulatory Commission, the main securities regulator in China.
** CCXR - China Chengxin International Credit Rating Company Limited , of which 49% shares owned by Moody (CCXR website Nov 13)
*** The descriptions above for “US 2a-7” are based on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Investment Company Act of 1940.
**** The descriptions above for “Fitch Chinese AAA MMF” are based on information from Fitch as of April 2013
^ Weighted Average Maturity ; ^^ Weighted Average Life
32. Page 32
Disclaimer & Contact
The views here represent personal opinions of the speaker and does not
necessarily reflect those of Valspar. All information is for reference
purpose and please consult your banks to verify regulatory requirements
and latest market situation.
Any comments and wish to obtain further information in this presentation
can contact via tony.lam@valspar.com
Thank You