Platelet-Rich Plasma vs. Cortisone Injections
for the Non-Surgical Treatment of Shoulder
                   Pain
                Alan M. Hirahara, M.D., FRCS(C)
                               Private Practice
                             Sacramento, CA USA




     Medical Director             Team Physician       Consultant
Sacramento State Athletics     Sacramento River Cats   Oakland A’s
                                    MiLB - AAA
Objective of Study
• To evaluate the outcomes of platelet-rich plasma
  (PRP) injections vs cortisone injections in
  patients with shoulder pain


• To reduce the risks of treating patients with
  shoulder pain by using a safe, effective, non-
  surgical treatment of shoulder pain
Introduction
• In the literature, outcomes vary significantly in treating
  shoulder pain non-surgically


• Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) - Improved healing of soft
  tissues & bone


• Cortisone carries risk of degeneration of tissue, AVN,
  inhibition of cell proliferation
   – PRP has not been shown to carry any risk
Study Design

• Case-control study


• Collection period: 1/09 – 12/11


• Pain scores, ASES scores taken every week for 1
  month, then every month for 6 months
   – ROM measured pre-injection / 4 wks post
Study Design
• All patients with shoulder pain
• Inclusions:
  – failed NSAID’s and physical therapy regimen

• Exclusions:
  – any trauma post-injection
  – non-compliance with therapy protocol
  – blood dyscrasias
PRP Technique
• 10 cc autologous blood drawn
• Using ACP system, blood spun for 5 minutes at 1500
  RPM
• Platelet Rich-Plasma (PRP) collected
Injection Technique
• All injections done by the primary author under
  ultrasound guidance
Patient Data
Study Group                  Control Group


• 186 patients               • 299 patients

• 85 male / 101 female       • 128 male / 171 female

• Age range: 17 – 86 years   • Age range: 22 – 90 years

• Age average: 52.48 years   • Age average: 54.09 years
Distribution of Pathology
Adhesive Capsulitis                                                                       70
                                                                                                    84

  Biceps tendonitis        4
                               6

     Ca tendonitis                      13
                                7

               DJD                            19
                                                                      39

         Instability       4
                            5

              pRCT                                 23
                                                    24

               RCT                                   26
                                                                           48

       SLAP lesion                 8
                                             18

    Tendonopathy                              19
                                                                                     68
                       0           10        20          30         40     50   60   70        80        90

                                                         PRP   Cortisone
All Patients
               Pain Scores                       ASES Scores
7.0                                       80.0


6.0                                       70.0


5.0                                       60.0


4.0                                       50.0


3.0                                       40.0


2.0                                       30.0


                                          20.0
1.0

                                          10.0
0.0

                                           0.0



            Study Group   Control Group


                                                               Study n = 186
  * p < 0.05 for Months 4 – 6 & 3 – 6
                                                               Control n = 299
All Patients
                                        ROM
 160.0


 140.0


 120.0


 100.0                                                   Flexion - Study
                                                         Flexion - Control

  80.0                                                   Abduction - Study
                                                         Abduction - Control

  60.0                                                   External Rotation - Study
                                                         External Rotation - Control

  40.0


  20.0


   0.0
                Pre-Injection                  4 Weeks


* No statistical significance between groups
Tendonopathy
         Pain Scores                             ASES Scores
8.0                                       90.0


7.0                                       80.0

                                          70.0
6.0

                                          60.0
5.0
                                          50.0
4.0
                                          40.0
3.0
                                          30.0

2.0
                                          20.0

1.0                                       10.0

 -                                          -




                                                      Study n = 19
      * p < 0.05 for Mo 6 & Mo 1 – 3, 6               Control n = 68
PASTA Lesions
                  Pain Scores                           ASES Scores
8.0

                                                 80.0
7.0
                                                 70.0
6.0
                                                 60.0
5.0
                                                 50.0

4.0                                              40.0

3.0                                              30.0

                                                 20.0
2.0
                                                 10.0
1.0
                                                   -

 -




                                                             Study n = 23
      * p < 0.05 for Wk 3 - Mo 6 & Mo 1, 4 - 6               Control n = 24
Full RC Tears
               Pain Scores                            ASES Scores
  8.0

                                               80.0
  7.0
                                               70.0
  6.0
                                               60.0
  5.0
                                               50.0

  4.0                                          40.0

  3.0                                          30.0

                                               20.0
  2.0
                                               10.0
  1.0
                                                 -

   -




                                                           Study n = 26
* No statistical significance between groups               Control n = 48
Adhesive Capsulitis
               Pain Scores                            ASES Scores
  6.0                                          80.0


                                               70.0
  5.0

                                               60.0

  4.0
                                               50.0


  3.0                                          40.0


                                               30.0
  2.0

                                               20.0

  1.0
                                               10.0


   -                                             -




                                                           Study n = 70
* No statistical significance between groups               Control n = 84
Shoulder DJD
               Pain Scores                            ASES Scores
  7.0

                                               80.0
  6.0
                                               70.0

  5.0                                          60.0

                                               50.0
  4.0
                                               40.0
  3.0
                                               30.0

  2.0                                          20.0

                                               10.0
  1.0
                                                 -

   -




                                                           Study n = 19
* No statistical significance between groups               Control n = 39
Discussion

• Both PRP & Cortisone injections can help
  relieve shoulder pain



• BUT PRP improves pain & function
  significantly more
PRP – Superior to Cortisone


       • Tendonopathy

       • PASTA lesions
PRP & Cortisone – Similar Effects


        • Adhesive capsulitis

        • Full-thickness RCT’s

        • DJD
Conclusion
• PRP can help diminish pain and improve
 function and ROM in patients with specific
 shoulder pathologies more than cortisone but
 with significantly less side-effects or risks


• Randomized study needed to confirm results
Thank You!

Platelet-rich Plasma vs. Cortisone Injections for the Non-surgical Treatment of Shoulder Pain

  • 1.
    Platelet-Rich Plasma vs.Cortisone Injections for the Non-Surgical Treatment of Shoulder Pain Alan M. Hirahara, M.D., FRCS(C) Private Practice Sacramento, CA USA Medical Director Team Physician Consultant Sacramento State Athletics Sacramento River Cats Oakland A’s MiLB - AAA
  • 2.
    Objective of Study •To evaluate the outcomes of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections vs cortisone injections in patients with shoulder pain • To reduce the risks of treating patients with shoulder pain by using a safe, effective, non- surgical treatment of shoulder pain
  • 3.
    Introduction • In theliterature, outcomes vary significantly in treating shoulder pain non-surgically • Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) - Improved healing of soft tissues & bone • Cortisone carries risk of degeneration of tissue, AVN, inhibition of cell proliferation – PRP has not been shown to carry any risk
  • 4.
    Study Design • Case-controlstudy • Collection period: 1/09 – 12/11 • Pain scores, ASES scores taken every week for 1 month, then every month for 6 months – ROM measured pre-injection / 4 wks post
  • 5.
    Study Design • Allpatients with shoulder pain • Inclusions: – failed NSAID’s and physical therapy regimen • Exclusions: – any trauma post-injection – non-compliance with therapy protocol – blood dyscrasias
  • 6.
    PRP Technique • 10cc autologous blood drawn • Using ACP system, blood spun for 5 minutes at 1500 RPM • Platelet Rich-Plasma (PRP) collected
  • 7.
    Injection Technique • Allinjections done by the primary author under ultrasound guidance
  • 8.
    Patient Data Study Group Control Group • 186 patients • 299 patients • 85 male / 101 female • 128 male / 171 female • Age range: 17 – 86 years • Age range: 22 – 90 years • Age average: 52.48 years • Age average: 54.09 years
  • 9.
    Distribution of Pathology AdhesiveCapsulitis 70 84 Biceps tendonitis 4 6 Ca tendonitis 13 7 DJD 19 39 Instability 4 5 pRCT 23 24 RCT 26 48 SLAP lesion 8 18 Tendonopathy 19 68 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 PRP Cortisone
  • 10.
    All Patients Pain Scores ASES Scores 7.0 80.0 6.0 70.0 5.0 60.0 4.0 50.0 3.0 40.0 2.0 30.0 20.0 1.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 Study Group Control Group Study n = 186 * p < 0.05 for Months 4 – 6 & 3 – 6 Control n = 299
  • 11.
    All Patients ROM 160.0 140.0 120.0 100.0 Flexion - Study Flexion - Control 80.0 Abduction - Study Abduction - Control 60.0 External Rotation - Study External Rotation - Control 40.0 20.0 0.0 Pre-Injection 4 Weeks * No statistical significance between groups
  • 12.
    Tendonopathy Pain Scores ASES Scores 8.0 90.0 7.0 80.0 70.0 6.0 60.0 5.0 50.0 4.0 40.0 3.0 30.0 2.0 20.0 1.0 10.0 - - Study n = 19 * p < 0.05 for Mo 6 & Mo 1 – 3, 6 Control n = 68
  • 13.
    PASTA Lesions Pain Scores ASES Scores 8.0 80.0 7.0 70.0 6.0 60.0 5.0 50.0 4.0 40.0 3.0 30.0 20.0 2.0 10.0 1.0 - - Study n = 23 * p < 0.05 for Wk 3 - Mo 6 & Mo 1, 4 - 6 Control n = 24
  • 14.
    Full RC Tears Pain Scores ASES Scores 8.0 80.0 7.0 70.0 6.0 60.0 5.0 50.0 4.0 40.0 3.0 30.0 20.0 2.0 10.0 1.0 - - Study n = 26 * No statistical significance between groups Control n = 48
  • 15.
    Adhesive Capsulitis Pain Scores ASES Scores 6.0 80.0 70.0 5.0 60.0 4.0 50.0 3.0 40.0 30.0 2.0 20.0 1.0 10.0 - - Study n = 70 * No statistical significance between groups Control n = 84
  • 16.
    Shoulder DJD Pain Scores ASES Scores 7.0 80.0 6.0 70.0 5.0 60.0 50.0 4.0 40.0 3.0 30.0 2.0 20.0 10.0 1.0 - - Study n = 19 * No statistical significance between groups Control n = 39
  • 17.
    Discussion • Both PRP& Cortisone injections can help relieve shoulder pain • BUT PRP improves pain & function significantly more
  • 18.
    PRP – Superiorto Cortisone • Tendonopathy • PASTA lesions
  • 19.
    PRP & Cortisone– Similar Effects • Adhesive capsulitis • Full-thickness RCT’s • DJD
  • 20.
    Conclusion • PRP canhelp diminish pain and improve function and ROM in patients with specific shoulder pathologies more than cortisone but with significantly less side-effects or risks • Randomized study needed to confirm results
  • 21.