This document outlines a research agenda for studying the second language acquisition (SLA) of low-educated language learners. It discusses several key points:
- Mainstream SLA theories assume learners are metalinguistically aware of units like words and phonemes, but research suggests pre-literate learners lack this awareness.
- Case studies show pre-literate learners may notice syllables, stress patterns, and vocabulary in recasts, but struggle with word order.
- Longitudinal research is needed to understand how pre-literate learners' interlanguage develops over time and literacy acquisition.
- The impact of corrective feedback on what linguistic forms pre-literate learn
Tarone Research Agenda on Second Language Acquisition by Low Literate AdultsAndrea DeCapua
Part 4 of TESOL 2012 Colloquium:
Promoting Excellence: Perspectives on ELLs with Limited/Interrupted Schooling
Elaine Tarone, drawing from research on ways in which pre-literate adolescents and adults process second-language input both orally and through an alphabetic script, examines key questions to help teachers and curriculum developers facilitate second-language and literacy acquisition.
The Effects of Two Languages in One Mind: First Language AttritionMattia Zingaretti
An introduction to the phenomenon of first language attrition with interactive materials, literature findings and useful resources for students and researchers. This is an Open Educational Resource (OER) co-created by Roberta Spelorzi and Mattia Zingaretti, PhD Researchers at the University of Edinburgh. This OER is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike, allowing viewers to download, use and make changes to the materials, providing attribution to the authors and distributing the content under the same license as the original.
Tarone Research Agenda on Second Language Acquisition by Low Literate AdultsAndrea DeCapua
Part 4 of TESOL 2012 Colloquium:
Promoting Excellence: Perspectives on ELLs with Limited/Interrupted Schooling
Elaine Tarone, drawing from research on ways in which pre-literate adolescents and adults process second-language input both orally and through an alphabetic script, examines key questions to help teachers and curriculum developers facilitate second-language and literacy acquisition.
The Effects of Two Languages in One Mind: First Language AttritionMattia Zingaretti
An introduction to the phenomenon of first language attrition with interactive materials, literature findings and useful resources for students and researchers. This is an Open Educational Resource (OER) co-created by Roberta Spelorzi and Mattia Zingaretti, PhD Researchers at the University of Edinburgh. This OER is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike, allowing viewers to download, use and make changes to the materials, providing attribution to the authors and distributing the content under the same license as the original.
Psychology of Language 5th Edition Carroll Test BankKiayadare
Full download : http://alibabadownload.com/product/psychology-of-language-5th-edition-carroll-test-bank/ Psychology of Language 5th Edition Carroll Test Bank
ATTITUDES TO THE USE OF L1 AND TRANSLATION IN SECOND LANGUAGE TEACHING AND L...Astrid Aguiar
The aim of this presentation is to identify the type of research that this journal is following ATTITUDES TO THE USE OF L1 AND TRANSLATION IN SECOND LANGUAGE TEACHING AND LEARNING by Dr Michael Druce
Psychology of Language 5th Edition Carroll Test BankKiayadare
Full download : http://alibabadownload.com/product/psychology-of-language-5th-edition-carroll-test-bank/ Psychology of Language 5th Edition Carroll Test Bank
ATTITUDES TO THE USE OF L1 AND TRANSLATION IN SECOND LANGUAGE TEACHING AND L...Astrid Aguiar
The aim of this presentation is to identify the type of research that this journal is following ATTITUDES TO THE USE OF L1 AND TRANSLATION IN SECOND LANGUAGE TEACHING AND LEARNING by Dr Michael Druce
Chapter three -Approaches to the study of second language acquisition-All.pptFawziEltayeb
This chapter tries to answer the question : How an L2 acquired ?
By manipulating the following approaches of second language acquisition :
1.Behaviouristic Approach
2.Cognitive /Psychological Approach
3.Creative Construction Approach
4. Sociological Approach
Types of L2 morphosyntactic knowledge that can and cannot be observed in lea...Ken Urano
2015 Joint International Methodology Research Colloquium KATE Corpus SIG & LET Kansai Methodology SIG @ National Institute for International Education May 16, 2015

9300AWEEK 1 What is language Our relationship with language. T.docxblondellchancy
9300A
WEEK 1: What is language? Our relationship with language. The Study of L2 Acquisition.
Readings:
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford
University Press. Chapter 1.
· As never before, people have had to learn a second language, not just as a pleasing pastime, but often as a means of obtaining an education or securing employment. At such a time, there is an obvious need to discover more about how second languages are learned. (学习二语的原因:why do you need to learn English? Is there have some special reason to learn [academic, daily life])
· ‘L2 acquisition’, then, can be defined as the way in which people learn a language other than their mother tongue, inside or out side of a classroom, and ‘Second Language Acquisition’ (SLA) as the study of this. [do you think you are a successful second language learner? Why? How you did it?]
· What are the goals of sla: learner language [how learners’ accents change over time. Another might be the words learners use; how learners build up their vocabulary.]
· What type of input facilitates learning? [do learners benefit more from input that has been simplified for them or from the authentic language of native-speaker communication?
· The goals of SLA, then, are to describe how L2 acquisition proceeds and to explain this process and why some learners seem to be better at it than others.
·
WEEK 2: First Language Acquisition
Readings:
Yule, G. (2016). The study of language. Cambridge university press. P.170-181 Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2006). How languages are learned. Oxford
University Press. Chapter 1
Yule: By the age of two-and-a-half, the child’s vocabulary is expanding rapidly and the child is initiating more talk while increased physical activity includes running and jumping. By three, the vocabulary has grown to hundreds of words and pronunciation has become closer to the form of adult language. At this point, it is worth considering what kind of influence the adults have in the development of the child’s speech.
Morphology; syntax
Lightbown: How do children accomplish this? What enables a child not only to learn words, but to put them together in meaningful sentences? What pushes children to go on developing complex grammatical language even though their early simple communication is successful for most purposes? Does child language develop similarly around the world? How do bilingual children acquire more than one language?
【Which stage do you think is the fastest progress in your second language?】
【How the interviewee’s knowledge of English grammar developed during the time? (if you cannot remember the learning processes, you can think what did you do, how does you try to learn an L2)】p.008
[学习者有没有背单词,是long-term memory 还是working memory?(cognition)]
Negation对立面p.9
WEEK 3: Behaviourism and Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis
Readings:
Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. P.69-71
Ellis, R. (2015). Understanding second ...
Elevating Tactical DDD Patterns Through Object CalisthenicsDorra BARTAGUIZ
After immersing yourself in the blue book and its red counterpart, attending DDD-focused conferences, and applying tactical patterns, you're left with a crucial question: How do I ensure my design is effective? Tactical patterns within Domain-Driven Design (DDD) serve as guiding principles for creating clear and manageable domain models. However, achieving success with these patterns requires additional guidance. Interestingly, we've observed that a set of constraints initially designed for training purposes remarkably aligns with effective pattern implementation, offering a more ‘mechanical’ approach. Let's explore together how Object Calisthenics can elevate the design of your tactical DDD patterns, offering concrete help for those venturing into DDD for the first time!
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 4. In this session, we will cover Test Manager overview along with SAP heatmap.
The UiPath Test Manager overview with SAP heatmap webinar offers a concise yet comprehensive exploration of the role of a Test Manager within SAP environments, coupled with the utilization of heatmaps for effective testing strategies.
Participants will gain insights into the responsibilities, challenges, and best practices associated with test management in SAP projects. Additionally, the webinar delves into the significance of heatmaps as a visual aid for identifying testing priorities, areas of risk, and resource allocation within SAP landscapes. Through this session, attendees can expect to enhance their understanding of test management principles while learning practical approaches to optimize testing processes in SAP environments using heatmap visualization techniques
What will you get from this session?
1. Insights into SAP testing best practices
2. Heatmap utilization for testing
3. Optimization of testing processes
4. Demo
Topics covered:
Execution from the test manager
Orchestrator execution result
Defect reporting
SAP heatmap example with demo
Speaker:
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
Software Delivery At the Speed of AI: Inflectra Invests In AI-Powered QualityInflectra
In this insightful webinar, Inflectra explores how artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming software development and testing. Discover how AI-powered tools are revolutionizing every stage of the software development lifecycle (SDLC), from design and prototyping to testing, deployment, and monitoring.
Learn about:
• The Future of Testing: How AI is shifting testing towards verification, analysis, and higher-level skills, while reducing repetitive tasks.
• Test Automation: How AI-powered test case generation, optimization, and self-healing tests are making testing more efficient and effective.
• Visual Testing: Explore the emerging capabilities of AI in visual testing and how it's set to revolutionize UI verification.
• Inflectra's AI Solutions: See demonstrations of Inflectra's cutting-edge AI tools like the ChatGPT plugin and Azure Open AI platform, designed to streamline your testing process.
Whether you're a developer, tester, or QA professional, this webinar will give you valuable insights into how AI is shaping the future of software delivery.
Neuro-symbolic is not enough, we need neuro-*semantic*Frank van Harmelen
Neuro-symbolic (NeSy) AI is on the rise. However, simply machine learning on just any symbolic structure is not sufficient to really harvest the gains of NeSy. These will only be gained when the symbolic structures have an actual semantics. I give an operational definition of semantics as “predictable inference”.
All of this illustrated with link prediction over knowledge graphs, but the argument is general.
Dev Dives: Train smarter, not harder – active learning and UiPath LLMs for do...UiPathCommunity
💥 Speed, accuracy, and scaling – discover the superpowers of GenAI in action with UiPath Document Understanding and Communications Mining™:
See how to accelerate model training and optimize model performance with active learning
Learn about the latest enhancements to out-of-the-box document processing – with little to no training required
Get an exclusive demo of the new family of UiPath LLMs – GenAI models specialized for processing different types of documents and messages
This is a hands-on session specifically designed for automation developers and AI enthusiasts seeking to enhance their knowledge in leveraging the latest intelligent document processing capabilities offered by UiPath.
Speakers:
👨🏫 Andras Palfi, Senior Product Manager, UiPath
👩🏫 Lenka Dulovicova, Product Program Manager, UiPath
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 3DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 3. In this session, we will cover desktop automation along with UI automation.
Topics covered:
UI automation Introduction,
UI automation Sample
Desktop automation flow
Pradeep Chinnala, Senior Consultant Automation Developer @WonderBotz and UiPath MVP
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
Epistemic Interaction - tuning interfaces to provide information for AI supportAlan Dix
Paper presented at SYNERGY workshop at AVI 2024, Genoa, Italy. 3rd June 2024
https://alandix.com/academic/papers/synergy2024-epistemic/
As machine learning integrates deeper into human-computer interactions, the concept of epistemic interaction emerges, aiming to refine these interactions to enhance system adaptability. This approach encourages minor, intentional adjustments in user behaviour to enrich the data available for system learning. This paper introduces epistemic interaction within the context of human-system communication, illustrating how deliberate interaction design can improve system understanding and adaptation. Through concrete examples, we demonstrate the potential of epistemic interaction to significantly advance human-computer interaction by leveraging intuitive human communication strategies to inform system design and functionality, offering a novel pathway for enriching user-system engagements.
Essentials of Automations: Optimizing FME Workflows with ParametersSafe Software
Are you looking to streamline your workflows and boost your projects’ efficiency? Do you find yourself searching for ways to add flexibility and control over your FME workflows? If so, you’re in the right place.
Join us for an insightful dive into the world of FME parameters, a critical element in optimizing workflow efficiency. This webinar marks the beginning of our three-part “Essentials of Automation” series. This first webinar is designed to equip you with the knowledge and skills to utilize parameters effectively: enhancing the flexibility, maintainability, and user control of your FME projects.
Here’s what you’ll gain:
- Essentials of FME Parameters: Understand the pivotal role of parameters, including Reader/Writer, Transformer, User, and FME Flow categories. Discover how they are the key to unlocking automation and optimization within your workflows.
- Practical Applications in FME Form: Delve into key user parameter types including choice, connections, and file URLs. Allow users to control how a workflow runs, making your workflows more reusable. Learn to import values and deliver the best user experience for your workflows while enhancing accuracy.
- Optimization Strategies in FME Flow: Explore the creation and strategic deployment of parameters in FME Flow, including the use of deployment and geometry parameters, to maximize workflow efficiency.
- Pro Tips for Success: Gain insights on parameterizing connections and leveraging new features like Conditional Visibility for clarity and simplicity.
We’ll wrap up with a glimpse into future webinars, followed by a Q&A session to address your specific questions surrounding this topic.
Don’t miss this opportunity to elevate your FME expertise and drive your projects to new heights of efficiency.
The Art of the Pitch: WordPress Relationships and SalesLaura Byrne
Clients don’t know what they don’t know. What web solutions are right for them? How does WordPress come into the picture? How do you make sure you understand scope and timeline? What do you do if sometime changes?
All these questions and more will be explored as we talk about matching clients’ needs with what your agency offers without pulling teeth or pulling your hair out. Practical tips, and strategies for successful relationship building that leads to closing the deal.
10. The Goal of SLA Research Describe & explain cognitive processes Document development of L2 interlanguage over time Focus on the learner Oral interlanguage, as used in communication
11. What does SLA research tell us about LESLLA/A learners? Very little in mainstream journals, conferences, books The SLA of the emergent reader is little known
17. SLA Research Basics Fundamental assumptions and relevant findings of SLA research Why these assumptions and findings do not fit low literate L2 learners
18. Fundamental Assumptions in SLA 1968 – S.P. Corder: L2 learner has innate cognitive implicit ‘built-in syllabus’ independent of teacher’s syllabus & of L1. 1972 – Selinker: interlanguage rules used implicitly to generate utterances 1980’s – Krashen: implicit L2 knowledge (acquired) is different from explicit L2 knowledge (learned) Difference explicit and implicit L2 knowledge
19. Explicit L2 Knowledge vs.Implicit L2 Knowledge Explicit knowledge = derives from skills learned in formal classroom settings: grammatical syllabi, memorization of rules and vocabulary, analyzing syntax, mechanically sequencing linguistic units to construct sentences Implicit knowledge = unconscious ‘built in syllabus’, organic growth of grammar through use in meaning-focused interaction
20. Independence of Explicit & Implicit Language Knowledge Teaching past counterfactual rule, e.g. ‘I wish I had known,’ ESL teacher says: ‘I wish I would have known’ Implicit knowledge without explicit awareness Explicit knowledge without implicit ability to use the language
21. Metalinguistic Cognitive Processes in SLA Theory (Educated L2 Learners) Mainstream theories assume that L2 learners must be explicitly aware of linguistic units like phonemes, morphemes, words to acquire L2s They must explicitly notice differences between the order of such units in the input and in their own speech (= notice the gap) Consider research on corrective feedback
22. Corrective feedback Learner: *What she is doing? (error) Teacher: What is she doing? (recast) Learner: What is she doing? (uptake)
23.
24.
25. Selected LESLLA Findings: Kurvers, Hout & Vallen (2006, 2007): alphabetic literacy --> awareness of the word and the phoneme as units Non alphabetically literate adults viewed language as means of communication, but not a string of linguistic units Onderlinden et al. (2009): degree of alphabetic literacy correlates with degree of ability to identify word boundaries Young-Scholten & Strom (2006): phonemic awareness only after learning to read; notions of syllable, onset, rhyme developed independently
26. Deficit or Difference? Is lack of phonological awareness a deficit? Bassetti (2005): different writing systems teach you to segment oral language in distinctive ways; not a deficit but definitely a difference English writing represents words and Chinese writing represents monosyllabic morphemes Literate English CFL learners segmented oral Chinese into “words” according to spacing conventions of the English writing system, different from segmentation conventions of literate Chinese, based on “hanzi”
27. Linguistic Units Used by Pre-literate Learners to Process L2 Input So into what kind of units do pre-literate adults and adolescents – who are not aware of words and phonemes – segment their oral L2 input? Recall Young-Scholten & Strom (2006): they are aware of syllables and rhyme.
28. Abukar 15 years old, in 9th grade Began formal schooling in US 4.5 years earlier (after 4 yrs in refugee camp) Scores show relatively low literacy level but developing oral proficiency: English literacy: 6 out of 9 possible Somali literacy: 4 out of 9 SPEAK: 50 out of 60 possible Question stage: 5 out of 6 possible
29. Abukar’s Common Errors with Questions Abukar: … what, what he is looking? Abukar: Why he is mad? Abukar: … why he come this room?
30. Abukar’s Common Errors with Questions Abukar: … what, what he is looking? Abukar: Why he is mad? Abukar: … why he come this room?
31. Form-Focused Recasts(1 on 1, not classroom) 1 Abukar: What he sit on, what he SIT on, or whatever? 2 MB: What is he sitting on? 3 Abukar: Mhm. 4 MB: What is he sitting on? Again. Repeat. 5 Abukar: What he sitting on? 6 MB: What IS he sitting on? 7 Abukar: Oh. What he sitting on? 8 MB: What IS he sitting on? 9 Abukar: What IS he sitting on? (from Tarone & Bigelow 2007)
32. Focus onSecond Syllable STRESS 01 Abukar: Why he is mad? Why [he], he is mad? 02 MB: [yeah] 03 MB: Why IS he mad? 04 Abukar: Why HE is mad? Why 05 MB: Why IS he mad? 06 Abukar: Why IS he mad? Why is, [is he]…
33. Focus on Vocabulary in Recast 01 Abukar: OK (pause) what is barrel, what is, what is the 02 thing in it? What is there? Is it, is there pennies in it? 03 MB: Yeah. Um, again. Are pennies in the jar? 04 Abukar: Is, are the penny in the jar? 05 MB: Yes. And, um, 06 Abukar: (whispers) jar 07 MB: you know she’s a waitress, so she gets tips, 08 Abukar: O K 09 MB: at the diner, 10 Abukar: mhm 11 MB: and every day she puts her tips in a jar 12 Abukar: oh. (pause) (xxx xxx) 13 MB: Here’s the jar. 14 Abukar: A jar? 15 Abukar: (20 turns later) Is this jar have, this jar, is this jar full of money?
34. Summing up: What aspect of the recasts does Abukar notice & repeat? He most easily recalls: New vocabulary: ‘jar’ Second position stress: daDAHdada He struggles (=requires several turns) to recall: Difference in order of words between trigger and recast: is hehe is Yet he’s communicating well in English L2
35. Implications & Questions SLA theory says that L2 learners must ‘notice the gap’ between linguistic forms in interlanguage, and those in the input Abukar may be noticing the gap in terms of his awareness of units like syllable and syllable stress, rather than in terms of units like ‘words’ and ‘word order’
36.
37. Can LESLLA/A learners acquire some L2 forms implicitly, without explicit analysis? OR,
38. Do these learners structure their explicit working memory for language in some way that researchers don’t see?
39.
40. 1. Metalinguistic Awareness: Possible Hypotheses The pre-literate L2 learner is not metalinguistically aware of any linguistic forms in L2 input; all processing is semantic. The pre-literate L2 learner has metalinguistic awareness of forms in oral L2 input, but this awareness is not framed in terms of phonemes, words, morphemes. It may be framed in terms of other formal units like syllables, syllable stress pattern (or rhythm), or rhyme (or vowel similarity). It may be framed in terms of more global units and organizations which may be detectable in memorization and recitation of long oral narratives, or the Koran The pre-literate L2 learner acquires some L2 linguistic forms without metalinguistic awareness, but other L2 linguistic forms require metalinguistic processing. Some can be acquired with semantic processing only. Some require metalinguistic awareness.
41. 2. Longitudinal Case Studies: Possible Hypotheses Interlanguage develops systematically across time and social context for pre-literate learners, but not in the same way as for literate learners. Longitudinal case studies with data from a range of contexts (Liu, Nicholas) High quality ethnography, access Look at data with fresh eyes In some social contexts, some linguistic forms are acquired earlier, and spread later to other social contexts. Other linguistic forms are acquired late, beginning in different social contexts. Longitudinal case studies patterned on Liu (1991) can document the variable acquisition patterns of preliterate adult L2 learners, as well as the social factors (interlocutor, contextual cues, language use patterns) that influence this variation
42. 3. Corrective Feedback: Possible Hypotheses Pre-literate L2 learners notice some linguistic units and not others when corrective feedback is structured in terms of phonemes, morphemes and words. Pre-literate L2 learners notice more, or different linguistic units, when corrective feedback is structured in terms of other formal units (e.g. syllables, syllable stress patterns, or intonation). Pre-literate L2 learners produce more uptake when corrective feedback represents units like words with symbols that are not script-based (e.g. colored blocks like Cuisinnaire rods). Pre-literate L2 learners produce more uptake when corrective feedback is framed in sociocultural terms (e.g. speak with the “voice” of Mrs. Y)
43. 4. Social Contexts of SLA: Possible Hypotheses Pre-literate L2 learners engage in different patterns of participation in different social contexts (e.g. formal vs. naturalistic – classrooms vs. communities), and this affects their patterns of interlanguage use and acquisition. A variationist study can identify influential social variables and related variability in interlanguage, and awareness of these will better inform teacher decisions. Pre-literate L2 learners bring unstudied assets to the process of oral SLA that derive from cultural practices such as recitation of long oral narratives, improvisation of oral poetry, or memorization and recitation of the Koran. An ethnographic case study can identify those assets and cultural practices, and the variable linguistic features of IL that benefit from exercise of those assets.
45. 5. Access, Ethics, and Politics Access Intercultural competence Cultural outsiders Positionality Representation Giving back
Editor's Notes
MARTHA
-The goal of the field of SLA research = describe and explain the cognitive processes of L2 learners, both children and adults, and the way their learner language develops over time (= acquisition)Focuses on the learner, not the teacher. How does cognition work in the mind of the learner? For example, how does the learner process corrective feedback? How does the learner formulate the rules of learner language?The primary data used in SLA research is the speech, in unrehearsed communication, of L2 learners; this gives us a window into their implicit, underlying knowledge of L2.Writing, speech in drills, and grammar tests tell us about their explicit knowledge of L2. GIVEN: Explicit knowledge in talk about L2, and implicit knowledge that underlies meaning-focused communication are usually very different, and the relationship between the two is hotly debated.
Wave around the Ellis and Long FAT BOOKS of research summaries. Only Ellis mentions, on 2 pages, the Bigelow delMas Hansen & Tarone study.
ELAINE-Pre-1968. Assumption: L2 learning was simple matter of replacing L1 forms with L2 forms; all difficulties caused by transferring L1 forms into L2Corder (1969) following Chomsky: focus on innate knowledge of language of L2 learners. ‘built-in syllabus’ for SLA, different from taught syllabi. Not justL1 transfer, but also other cognitive processes; Selinker 1972: overgeneralization of L2 rules (as in FLA), transfer of training, learning strategies-Overly cognitive orientation in the ensuing decades of research: mind of L2 learner imagined as like a computer; give it language input, it processes the input in the CPU to formulate IL rules of grammar, morphology, phonology; no attention paid to social context, or impact of contexts outside of school on the L2 learning process. All L2 learners imagined to be like those accessible to the researchers: educated learners in school contexts.
ELAINETelling learners the rules ,memorizing the rules, painstakingly assembling sentences rule by rule … this did not seem to result in the ability to actually USE those rules unconsciously in communication.Implicit learner knowledge seems to develop organically, like a plant. And for the educated learners studied, a balance needed to be struck between focus on explicit rules, and focus on meaning in communication, which fostered development of implicit knowledge
ELAINE
ELAINELearner leaves out a linguistic unit ‘is’. Her meaning is clear without it.Teacher adds the linguistic unit.Learner must notice she’s added that form, which doesn’t change the meaning, and add it in the right spot.
MARTHA.
With literacy is there a different purpose for learning language?
Not at the word level at the discourse level. S[eaking with the voice of my teacher, or speaking with the voice of my big brother who’s two grades ahead of me: how would HE say this?
A lot of our research has been one on one, outside the classroom. How do classroom dynamics affect SLA? Record desk work, group work, reading lessons, corrective feedback in teacher fronted interaction, etc.