A New Retention Variable: Hope
and First Generation College
Students
By: Xochitl Regalado and Andin Setka
Presentation Outline
★ ICEBREAKER/GROUPING
★ WHY THIS ARTICLE WAS CREATED
★ WHAT THIS ARTICLE IS ABOUT
★ THE MAIN POINTS
★ WHY WE, AS MENTORS BENEFIT FROM IT
★ LEARNING EVALUATION
Icebreaker
THREE FACTS ABOUT ME
FIND YOUR PAIR
AND GROUP UP
Article Authors
★ Cyrus R. Williams
○ Worked as a counselor for first generation college students
○ University of Florida and University of Connecticut
○ His research interests lie in first generation and the intersection of race and socioeconomic
status
★ S. Kent Butler
○ Associate professor at the University of Central Florida
○ He is nationally certified and provincially licensed as a counselor
○ His research interests lie in multicultural, school, group, and social justice counselling
Why/Purpose
★ First generation students are often misguided and often fail due to many schools attempting to
identify and treat student’s remedial issues and academic shortcomings.
★ The purpose of this article is to target four main topics:
○ The overview of first generation college students participation in higher education
○ To outline the unique issues that this student population possess as a result of race and class
○ To describe Snyder’s Hope Theory
○ To provide suggestions and recommendations in relation to activities that will assist in the
development of a culture of hope on college campuses.
Who?
★ Learners whose parents have either not attended college or completed a college degree (Billson &
Terry, 1982).
★ These students are also among the least likely to continue their studies and pursue post-secondary
degrees (Thayer, 2000).
★ Nearly 30% of our current student population is comprised of first generation college students
(Indiana University-Purdue University 2019).
★ Disproportionately over-represented in groups which are usually filled with the most disadvantaged
Challenges First Generation Students Face
★ Lack of Knowledge
★ Lack of Support
○ Professional
○ Financial
○ Academic
○ Psychological
★ Fitting in on campus
★ Guilt
★ Conflicting obligations
★ False expectations
Three Themes of Research
1. Academic Preparation
a. Less academically prepared going into college
b. Neglect to follow rigorous curriculum/get low scores on ACT & SAT
2. Transitional Problems
a. Less likely to be involved on campus; take more remedial courses
b. Tend to work more
c. Live at home/commute
d. Struggle adapting their values and attitudes to the newly introduced college culture
3. Campus Climate
a. Less likely to socialize with peers and instructors; lower levels of academic/social integration
b. Less likely to view faculty as concerned about their success
Why should I succeed when they have failed?
● Whitten (1992) and Piorkowski (1983)
● Survivors Guilt - guilt associated with surviving a traumatic situation.
● Such students often face issues regarding alcoholism, drug abuse, mental illness, family violence,
criminal behavior.
● Struggle with the idea of being more successful than their parents and family members.
● Ridiculed, discouraged, and criticized for wanting to go to college.
● Students engage in self-sabotage, procrastination, decreased productivity…
● Devaluation of one’s self-concept, accomplishments, and ambitions.
How race/class/first generation relate
★ Completion rates for African American, Hispanic, and Native American students have always lagged
behind those of White and Asian students.
★ Intrapersonal dynamics play a heavy role in the lives of first generation students and this is only made
more prominent when coming from a lower income, and/or minority group.
★ Intrapersonal dynamics can be broken into several parts:
○ Family - misinterpret benefits of collegiate education; contribute to family income; students feel
guilty regarding the pursuit of higher education, while their families struggle to survive.
○ Community - disconnect from culture
○ Peer Influence - can help establish a sense of strong academic self concept; lack peers who have
higher education aspirations
Positive Psychology - “What is right about
people”?
★ The goal of Positive Psychology is to discover and encourage individual’s strengths, personal
attributes, resources, and the assets that allow them to flourish and overcome obstacles.
★ Not strengths vs weaknesses but capitalizing on strengths and managing weaknesses.
★ Constructs of Positive Psychology:
○ Resilience
○ Optimism
○ Hardiness
○ Strengths
○ Wisdom
○ Hope
Such variables are used to measure
individual levels of human functioning,
and happiness, along with people's
ability to realize their personal and
academic potential.
Hope?
★ What do you think the definition of hope is, in relation to your first year of college?
○ Common answer:
■ Most people will say something that relates to graduating on time with a major they are
passionate about, and going into a career that they can make a difference with.
● This is a hope based on emotion.
Hope Theory
★ The Hope Theory was formulated by C. R. Snyder
★ It is based on the contemporary meaning which centers less on emotions, perceptions, and desires, but
more on thoughts.
★ “The process of thinking about one’s goals, along with the motivation to move toward those goals
(agency), and the ways to achieve those goals (pathways)” (Snyder, 1995, p. 355).
★ While there has been some study into Hope Theory and its impact on college students there isn’t a
main focused study on its impact on first generation college students.
★ Available research does confirm that hope correlates with superior academic performances at all
levels of education, and this holds true for first generation college students.
High Hope versus Low Hope
● High Hope Individuals:
○ Inspired, Confident, High Self-Worth
○ Lowered sense of depression; effective coping skills - approach problems with a focus of
wanting to be successful
○ Break down goals into smaller achievable steps; open-minded view in terms of how to complete
set goals
● Low Hope Individuals:
○ Frequently give up
○ Experience more negative self-talk (downgrade)
○ Do not possess internal goals; focus on “how poorly they are doing”
○ Approach problem solving with a “narrow perspective”; Aspirations may be too big
Hope and Academic Success
★ Previously, there had been no study conducted on the correlation between first generation and the
hope construct.
★ 2002- Snyder, Rand, and Sigmon study:
○ This study charted across a span of 6 years, and it looked at what the GPAs were for college
students when the Hope Scale was administered.
■ It predicted
● Higher GPAs
● Lower dropout rates
● Higher graduation rates
○ 3,287 college students who participated in the study, 40.27% of low hope students graduated
compared to 56.50% of high hope students graduated
Who inspires Hope?
★ What resources on IUPUI’s campus would you utilize if you needed motivational support?
Retention Programs
★ Ultimate goal: “help students discover, develop and apply their strengths and talents so that they will
persist, achieve and gain maximum benefits from the college experience”.
★ Current view of retention is drastically different; emphasizes student/ institution fit and establish
academic programs that center and address student deficiencies.
★ College counselors - dynamic view of race, ethnicity and social class
★ Focus groups/small groups - shared cultural values
★ First year experience/seminars - retention based classes; train faculty and students about hope,
positive psychology and strengths based interventions; Learn about the institution and services
offered as well as help students gain study skills.
★ Teachers - help students understand how to effectively create goals and pursue them.
Learning Evaluation
★ How does the topics we discussed today apply to your mentoring component?
References
Anderson, J. R. (1988).The role of hope in appraisal, goal-setting, expectancy,and
coping. Unpublished dissertation. University of Kansas, Lawrence.
Anderson, N. (2004). "A good student, trapped": Urban minority males and constructions
of academic achievement. Perspectives in Education, 22(4), 71-82.
Astin, A. W. (1996). Involvement in learning revisited: Lessons we have learned. Journal
of College Student Personnel, 37(2), 123.
Barefoot, B. O. (2004). Higher education's revolving door: Confronting the problem of
student drop out in U.S. colleges and universities. Open Learning, 19(1), 9-18.
Bertrand, J. T., Brown, J.E., Ward, W. M. (1992). Techniques for analyzing focus group
data. Evaluation Review, 16 (2), 198-209.
Billson, J. M., & Terry, M. B. (1982). In search of the silken purse: Factors in attrition
among first-generation students. College and University, 58 (1), 57-75.
Boyd-Franklin, N., & Garcia-Preto, N. (1994). Family therapy: The cases of African
American and Hispanic women. In L. Comas-Diaz & B. Greene (Eds.), Women of
color: Integrating ethnic and gender identities in psychotherapy. (pp. 239-264)
New York: Guilford Press.
Bradburn, E. M. (2002). Short-term enrollment in postsecondary education: Student
background and institutional differences in reasons for early departure, 1996-98.
Postsecondary education descriptive analysis reports. Jessup, MD: U.S. Dept. of Education.
References
Brooks-Terry, M. (1988). Tracing the disadvantages of first-generation college students:
An application of Sussman's option sequence model. In S. K. Steinmetz (Ed.),
Family and support systems across the life span. (pp. 121-134). New York:
Plenum Press.
Bui, K. V. T. (2002). First-generation college students at a four-year university:
Background characteristics, reasons for pursuing higher education, and first-year
experiences.College Student Journal, 36 (1), 3-11.
Chang, E. C. (1998). Hope, problem-solving ability, and coping in a college student
population: Some implications for theory and practice. Journal of Clinical
Psychology, 54 (7), 953-962.
Chin, J. L. (1994). Psychodynamic approaches. In L. Comas-Diaz & B. Greene (Eds.),
Women of color: Integrating ethnic and gender identities in psychotherapy. (pp.
194-222) New York: Guilford Press.
Choy, S. P. (2001). Students whose parents did not go to college: Postsecondary access,
persistence and attainment (NCES 2001-126). Washington, DC: U.S. Department
of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Clifton, D. O., & Anderson, E. C. (2002). StrengthsQuest: Discover and develop your
strengths in academics, career, and beyond. Washington, DC: The Gallup
Organization.
References
Constantine, M. G. (2001). Multicultural training, theoretical orientation, empathy, and
multicultural case conceptualization ability in counselors. AMHCA Journal,
23 (4), 357-372.
Conti, R. (2000). College goals: Do self-determined and carefully considered goals
predict intrinsic motivation, academic performance, and adjustment during the
first semester? Social Psychology of Education, 4 (2), 189-211.
doi:10.1023/A:1009607907509.
Coyle, A. (1998). Qualitative research in counseling psychology: Using the counseling
interview as a research instrument. In R Clarkson (Ed.), Counseling psychology:
Integrating theory, research and supervised-practice (pp. 57-73). London:
Routledge.
Davig, W. B., & Spain, J. W. (2004). Impact on freshmen retention of orientation course
content: Proposed persistence model. Journal of College Student Retention:
Research, Theory & Practice, 5 (3), 305-32
Dennis, J. M., Phinney, J. S., & Chuateco, L. I. (2005).The role of motivation, parental
support, and peer support in the academic success of ethnic minority first-
generation college students. Journal of College Student Development, 46(3), 223-
236.

A New Retention Variable: Hope & First Generation College Students

  • 1.
    A New RetentionVariable: Hope and First Generation College Students By: Xochitl Regalado and Andin Setka
  • 2.
    Presentation Outline ★ ICEBREAKER/GROUPING ★WHY THIS ARTICLE WAS CREATED ★ WHAT THIS ARTICLE IS ABOUT ★ THE MAIN POINTS ★ WHY WE, AS MENTORS BENEFIT FROM IT ★ LEARNING EVALUATION
  • 3.
    Icebreaker THREE FACTS ABOUTME FIND YOUR PAIR AND GROUP UP
  • 4.
    Article Authors ★ CyrusR. Williams ○ Worked as a counselor for first generation college students ○ University of Florida and University of Connecticut ○ His research interests lie in first generation and the intersection of race and socioeconomic status ★ S. Kent Butler ○ Associate professor at the University of Central Florida ○ He is nationally certified and provincially licensed as a counselor ○ His research interests lie in multicultural, school, group, and social justice counselling
  • 5.
    Why/Purpose ★ First generationstudents are often misguided and often fail due to many schools attempting to identify and treat student’s remedial issues and academic shortcomings. ★ The purpose of this article is to target four main topics: ○ The overview of first generation college students participation in higher education ○ To outline the unique issues that this student population possess as a result of race and class ○ To describe Snyder’s Hope Theory ○ To provide suggestions and recommendations in relation to activities that will assist in the development of a culture of hope on college campuses.
  • 6.
    Who? ★ Learners whoseparents have either not attended college or completed a college degree (Billson & Terry, 1982). ★ These students are also among the least likely to continue their studies and pursue post-secondary degrees (Thayer, 2000). ★ Nearly 30% of our current student population is comprised of first generation college students (Indiana University-Purdue University 2019). ★ Disproportionately over-represented in groups which are usually filled with the most disadvantaged
  • 7.
    Challenges First GenerationStudents Face ★ Lack of Knowledge ★ Lack of Support ○ Professional ○ Financial ○ Academic ○ Psychological ★ Fitting in on campus ★ Guilt ★ Conflicting obligations ★ False expectations
  • 8.
    Three Themes ofResearch 1. Academic Preparation a. Less academically prepared going into college b. Neglect to follow rigorous curriculum/get low scores on ACT & SAT 2. Transitional Problems a. Less likely to be involved on campus; take more remedial courses b. Tend to work more c. Live at home/commute d. Struggle adapting their values and attitudes to the newly introduced college culture 3. Campus Climate a. Less likely to socialize with peers and instructors; lower levels of academic/social integration b. Less likely to view faculty as concerned about their success
  • 9.
    Why should Isucceed when they have failed? ● Whitten (1992) and Piorkowski (1983) ● Survivors Guilt - guilt associated with surviving a traumatic situation. ● Such students often face issues regarding alcoholism, drug abuse, mental illness, family violence, criminal behavior. ● Struggle with the idea of being more successful than their parents and family members. ● Ridiculed, discouraged, and criticized for wanting to go to college. ● Students engage in self-sabotage, procrastination, decreased productivity… ● Devaluation of one’s self-concept, accomplishments, and ambitions.
  • 10.
    How race/class/first generationrelate ★ Completion rates for African American, Hispanic, and Native American students have always lagged behind those of White and Asian students. ★ Intrapersonal dynamics play a heavy role in the lives of first generation students and this is only made more prominent when coming from a lower income, and/or minority group. ★ Intrapersonal dynamics can be broken into several parts: ○ Family - misinterpret benefits of collegiate education; contribute to family income; students feel guilty regarding the pursuit of higher education, while their families struggle to survive. ○ Community - disconnect from culture ○ Peer Influence - can help establish a sense of strong academic self concept; lack peers who have higher education aspirations
  • 11.
    Positive Psychology -“What is right about people”? ★ The goal of Positive Psychology is to discover and encourage individual’s strengths, personal attributes, resources, and the assets that allow them to flourish and overcome obstacles. ★ Not strengths vs weaknesses but capitalizing on strengths and managing weaknesses. ★ Constructs of Positive Psychology: ○ Resilience ○ Optimism ○ Hardiness ○ Strengths ○ Wisdom ○ Hope Such variables are used to measure individual levels of human functioning, and happiness, along with people's ability to realize their personal and academic potential.
  • 12.
    Hope? ★ What doyou think the definition of hope is, in relation to your first year of college? ○ Common answer: ■ Most people will say something that relates to graduating on time with a major they are passionate about, and going into a career that they can make a difference with. ● This is a hope based on emotion.
  • 13.
    Hope Theory ★ TheHope Theory was formulated by C. R. Snyder ★ It is based on the contemporary meaning which centers less on emotions, perceptions, and desires, but more on thoughts. ★ “The process of thinking about one’s goals, along with the motivation to move toward those goals (agency), and the ways to achieve those goals (pathways)” (Snyder, 1995, p. 355). ★ While there has been some study into Hope Theory and its impact on college students there isn’t a main focused study on its impact on first generation college students. ★ Available research does confirm that hope correlates with superior academic performances at all levels of education, and this holds true for first generation college students.
  • 14.
    High Hope versusLow Hope ● High Hope Individuals: ○ Inspired, Confident, High Self-Worth ○ Lowered sense of depression; effective coping skills - approach problems with a focus of wanting to be successful ○ Break down goals into smaller achievable steps; open-minded view in terms of how to complete set goals ● Low Hope Individuals: ○ Frequently give up ○ Experience more negative self-talk (downgrade) ○ Do not possess internal goals; focus on “how poorly they are doing” ○ Approach problem solving with a “narrow perspective”; Aspirations may be too big
  • 15.
    Hope and AcademicSuccess ★ Previously, there had been no study conducted on the correlation between first generation and the hope construct. ★ 2002- Snyder, Rand, and Sigmon study: ○ This study charted across a span of 6 years, and it looked at what the GPAs were for college students when the Hope Scale was administered. ■ It predicted ● Higher GPAs ● Lower dropout rates ● Higher graduation rates ○ 3,287 college students who participated in the study, 40.27% of low hope students graduated compared to 56.50% of high hope students graduated
  • 16.
    Who inspires Hope? ★What resources on IUPUI’s campus would you utilize if you needed motivational support?
  • 17.
    Retention Programs ★ Ultimategoal: “help students discover, develop and apply their strengths and talents so that they will persist, achieve and gain maximum benefits from the college experience”. ★ Current view of retention is drastically different; emphasizes student/ institution fit and establish academic programs that center and address student deficiencies. ★ College counselors - dynamic view of race, ethnicity and social class ★ Focus groups/small groups - shared cultural values ★ First year experience/seminars - retention based classes; train faculty and students about hope, positive psychology and strengths based interventions; Learn about the institution and services offered as well as help students gain study skills. ★ Teachers - help students understand how to effectively create goals and pursue them.
  • 18.
    Learning Evaluation ★ Howdoes the topics we discussed today apply to your mentoring component?
  • 19.
    References Anderson, J. R.(1988).The role of hope in appraisal, goal-setting, expectancy,and coping. Unpublished dissertation. University of Kansas, Lawrence. Anderson, N. (2004). "A good student, trapped": Urban minority males and constructions of academic achievement. Perspectives in Education, 22(4), 71-82. Astin, A. W. (1996). Involvement in learning revisited: Lessons we have learned. Journal of College Student Personnel, 37(2), 123. Barefoot, B. O. (2004). Higher education's revolving door: Confronting the problem of student drop out in U.S. colleges and universities. Open Learning, 19(1), 9-18. Bertrand, J. T., Brown, J.E., Ward, W. M. (1992). Techniques for analyzing focus group data. Evaluation Review, 16 (2), 198-209. Billson, J. M., & Terry, M. B. (1982). In search of the silken purse: Factors in attrition among first-generation students. College and University, 58 (1), 57-75. Boyd-Franklin, N., & Garcia-Preto, N. (1994). Family therapy: The cases of African American and Hispanic women. In L. Comas-Diaz & B. Greene (Eds.), Women of color: Integrating ethnic and gender identities in psychotherapy. (pp. 239-264) New York: Guilford Press. Bradburn, E. M. (2002). Short-term enrollment in postsecondary education: Student background and institutional differences in reasons for early departure, 1996-98. Postsecondary education descriptive analysis reports. Jessup, MD: U.S. Dept. of Education.
  • 20.
    References Brooks-Terry, M. (1988).Tracing the disadvantages of first-generation college students: An application of Sussman's option sequence model. In S. K. Steinmetz (Ed.), Family and support systems across the life span. (pp. 121-134). New York: Plenum Press. Bui, K. V. T. (2002). First-generation college students at a four-year university: Background characteristics, reasons for pursuing higher education, and first-year experiences.College Student Journal, 36 (1), 3-11. Chang, E. C. (1998). Hope, problem-solving ability, and coping in a college student population: Some implications for theory and practice. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54 (7), 953-962. Chin, J. L. (1994). Psychodynamic approaches. In L. Comas-Diaz & B. Greene (Eds.), Women of color: Integrating ethnic and gender identities in psychotherapy. (pp. 194-222) New York: Guilford Press. Choy, S. P. (2001). Students whose parents did not go to college: Postsecondary access, persistence and attainment (NCES 2001-126). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Clifton, D. O., & Anderson, E. C. (2002). StrengthsQuest: Discover and develop your strengths in academics, career, and beyond. Washington, DC: The Gallup Organization.
  • 21.
    References Constantine, M. G.(2001). Multicultural training, theoretical orientation, empathy, and multicultural case conceptualization ability in counselors. AMHCA Journal, 23 (4), 357-372. Conti, R. (2000). College goals: Do self-determined and carefully considered goals predict intrinsic motivation, academic performance, and adjustment during the first semester? Social Psychology of Education, 4 (2), 189-211. doi:10.1023/A:1009607907509. Coyle, A. (1998). Qualitative research in counseling psychology: Using the counseling interview as a research instrument. In R Clarkson (Ed.), Counseling psychology: Integrating theory, research and supervised-practice (pp. 57-73). London: Routledge. Davig, W. B., & Spain, J. W. (2004). Impact on freshmen retention of orientation course content: Proposed persistence model. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 5 (3), 305-32 Dennis, J. M., Phinney, J. S., & Chuateco, L. I. (2005).The role of motivation, parental support, and peer support in the academic success of ethnic minority first- generation college students. Journal of College Student Development, 46(3), 223- 236.

Editor's Notes

  • #4 After they find their partner a way we could group them is to then have them find something they each have in common with another group.
  • #8 Before this slide we could pass out the first group activity which is making a list of challenges they faced when first coming to IUPUI. Then we have them compare their lists to this one.
  • #10 Activity: Let's say you are mentoring a first generation college student trying to work things out, and they pose you with this question… How do you respond? (Discussion Activity)
  • #15 Activity: Hand out Hope Scale Quiz!
  • #17 Activity - Discussion question regarding hope and IUPUI resources.