This document describes a method for studying medical problem solving and reasoning. The method involves having physicians work through simulated medical cases while thinking aloud. Their interactions are videotaped and later reviewed to stimulate their memory and allow them to elaborate on their thinking process. The fundamental units of analysis are questions asked, critical findings identified, and hypotheses generated. Eight categories of questions relate to medical history taking. Critical findings are assigned weights based on their relevance to diagnostic hypotheses. Hypotheses are identified from physician thinking aloud and retrospection. The method aims to objectively and reliably analyze medical diagnosis as a process of hypothesis testing, while also relating findings to broader theories of problem solving. It was tested by applying it to analyze two physician workups of the
1. The document discusses levels of evidence (LOE) and strength of recommendation taxonomies (SORT) in evaluating clinical practice guidelines. 2. LOE considers the reliability and bias of different study designs, with randomized controlled trials having the highest LOE. SORT criteria rate the usefulness and applicability of clinical recommendations. 3. Both LOE and SORT provide a quick assessment of evidence quality, and are important for evaluating disease-oriented versus patient-centered outcomes and determining the applicability of guidelines to individual patients.
This document summarizes key aspects of experimental psychology and the scientific method discussed in Chapter 1 of the textbook. It covers how experimental psychology uses the scientific method to obtain knowledge about psychological processes, in contrast to commonsense psychology. The scientific method involves gathering observable data, developing theories, using objective and rational reasoning, challenging hypotheses through attempts to falsify rather than verify them, and replicating experimental procedures. Psychology experiments aim to demonstrate cause-and-effect relationships between treatment conditions and behaviors by applying different treatments and measuring outcomes. The four main sections of a psychological report are also summarized.
This document summarizes key aspects of experimental psychology and the scientific method discussed in Chapter 1 of the textbook. It covers how experimental psychology uses the scientific method to obtain knowledge about psychological processes, in contrast to commonsense psychology. The scientific method involves gathering observable data, developing theories, using objective and rational reasoning, challenging hypotheses through attempts to falsify rather than verify them, and replicating experimental procedures. Psychology experiments aim to demonstrate cause-and-effect relationships between treatment conditions and behaviors by applying different treatments and measuring outcomes. The four main sections of a psychological report are also summarized.
Research aims to discover new facts or verify existing facts through a scientific process of observation, inference, and experimentation. There are several types of research including basic research conducted in laboratories, applied clinical research in hospitals, empirical research that applies a scientific approach to traditional beliefs, and operational research involving surveys. Research must have a clear problem statement, plan, and build on existing data using both positive and negative findings to collect new information and answer the original research questions. Key elements of good research include a well-thought research question or hypothesis, an appropriate design, correct sampling, unbiased interpretation of results, and use of relevant statistics. Meta-analysis statistically combines results from multiple studies on a topic to provide a quantitative summary.
General Psychology Instructor: Dan Benkendorf. Psychology is the science of behavior and mental processes. It seeks to answer questions about the relationship between the brain and behavior, the origins of personality, why people conform to social norms, and the causes of mental illness. There are several specialty areas in psychology including biological, cognitive, experimental, developmental, social, personality, health, educational, and clinical. The scientific method uses assumptions, evidence, and conclusions to describe, explain, predict, and control behaviors. Knowledge of research methods enables accurate predictions.
1. The document discusses levels of evidence (LOE) and strength of recommendation taxonomies (SORT) in evaluating clinical practice guidelines. 2. LOE considers the reliability and bias of different study designs, with randomized controlled trials having the highest LOE. SORT criteria rate the usefulness and applicability of clinical recommendations. 3. Both LOE and SORT provide a quick assessment of evidence quality, and are important for evaluating disease-oriented versus patient-centered outcomes and determining the applicability of guidelines to individual patients.
This document summarizes key aspects of experimental psychology and the scientific method discussed in Chapter 1 of the textbook. It covers how experimental psychology uses the scientific method to obtain knowledge about psychological processes, in contrast to commonsense psychology. The scientific method involves gathering observable data, developing theories, using objective and rational reasoning, challenging hypotheses through attempts to falsify rather than verify them, and replicating experimental procedures. Psychology experiments aim to demonstrate cause-and-effect relationships between treatment conditions and behaviors by applying different treatments and measuring outcomes. The four main sections of a psychological report are also summarized.
This document summarizes key aspects of experimental psychology and the scientific method discussed in Chapter 1 of the textbook. It covers how experimental psychology uses the scientific method to obtain knowledge about psychological processes, in contrast to commonsense psychology. The scientific method involves gathering observable data, developing theories, using objective and rational reasoning, challenging hypotheses through attempts to falsify rather than verify them, and replicating experimental procedures. Psychology experiments aim to demonstrate cause-and-effect relationships between treatment conditions and behaviors by applying different treatments and measuring outcomes. The four main sections of a psychological report are also summarized.
Research aims to discover new facts or verify existing facts through a scientific process of observation, inference, and experimentation. There are several types of research including basic research conducted in laboratories, applied clinical research in hospitals, empirical research that applies a scientific approach to traditional beliefs, and operational research involving surveys. Research must have a clear problem statement, plan, and build on existing data using both positive and negative findings to collect new information and answer the original research questions. Key elements of good research include a well-thought research question or hypothesis, an appropriate design, correct sampling, unbiased interpretation of results, and use of relevant statistics. Meta-analysis statistically combines results from multiple studies on a topic to provide a quantitative summary.
General Psychology Instructor: Dan Benkendorf. Psychology is the science of behavior and mental processes. It seeks to answer questions about the relationship between the brain and behavior, the origins of personality, why people conform to social norms, and the causes of mental illness. There are several specialty areas in psychology including biological, cognitive, experimental, developmental, social, personality, health, educational, and clinical. The scientific method uses assumptions, evidence, and conclusions to describe, explain, predict, and control behaviors. Knowledge of research methods enables accurate predictions.
Application Of Statistical Process Control In Manufacturing Company To Unders...Martha Brown
This document describes a systematic review of 57 studies on the application of statistical process control (SPC) in healthcare quality improvement. The review found that SPC was applied in a wide range of healthcare settings and specialties using 97 different variables. Benefits identified included helping various stakeholders manage change and improve processes. Limitations included the complexity of correctly applying SPC. Barriers were things like lack of staff training, while factors facilitating use included leadership support and data feedback. Overall, SPC was found to be a versatile tool for quality improvement when applied appropriately.
EVIDENCE –BASED PRACTICES 1
Evidence-Based Practices
Stephanie Petit-homme
Miami Regional University
Professor: Garcia Mercedes
07/05/2021
Evidence-Based Practices to Guide Clinical Practices
In other terms recognized as evidence-based medication, evidence-based scientific practice is elucidated as the careful, obvious, and judicious use of the best indication in creating results for the outstanding care of separate patients. It helps those who brand the choices to device best healthcare practices while drawing the roadmaps for the health system. In clinical trials, the integration of the EBCP entails clinical respiratory medicine considers two fundamental principles. For example, the principle is the hierarchy of the evidence and the art of clinical decision-making.
The interrelationship between the theory, research, and EBP
The relationship between the theory, research, and the EBP supports the three recognition programs. They still relate in terms of the magnet model component of modern knowledge, innovation, and advancement. They describe in a way in which they lead to the promotion of quality in a setting that makes supports professional practices. Second, there is the identification of excellence in giving nursing services to sick people or the people who stay around. For instance, the model, which is other terms the magnet theory, has got five components ( Reddy, 2018).
The first constituent includes transformational management; the additional is structural authorization. The third one is archetypal specialized practices, new information, invention, and upgrading. Lastly, in the model, there are the empirical quality outcomes. For the achievement of the aims of the goals that have been set, there is a need to make sure that the theory, current knowledge innovation, and the improvements and the components that are found in view all the nurses who are located in the levels of the healthcare company need to get involved.
The research has its primary purpose for the help of coming up with knowledge or the validation done for the knowledge that has always been there from before based on the theory. There is systematic, scientific questioning in the research to give the answers to some of the specific questions. It can use the test hypotheses and the rigorous method, the primary purpose of the study being for investigation knowing of the new things and the exploration. There is a need to understand the philosophy of science.
Second, on the EBP, there is no development of the new knowledge or even the learning being validated. The primary purpose of the EBP is to translate the evidence and then apply it to medical executive. It uses the indication available to brand patient-care choices. The EBP goes yonder the exploration as fine as the persevering penchants and ideals. The EBP retains into deliberation that the best indication is for the opinion leaders and the experts. Even though there is the existence of definitiv ...
Concepts For Clinical Judgment Discussion Module 3.docxstudywriters
The document discusses a research article about clinical judgment in nursing. It finds that clinical judgment is influenced more by what nurses bring to a situation than objective data alone. Experience, knowledge, intuition and reflection all contribute to developing strong clinical judgment. The document presents a model of clinical judgment that emphasizes how a nurse's background, the context of the situation, and their relationship with patients shape what they notice and how they assess patients.
This document discusses research methodology and how it can be applied to homeopathy. It defines different types of study designs including observational studies, treatment studies, randomized controlled trials, and meta-analyses. It explains how to apply these research methodologies to homeopathy through drug provings, clinical research studies, and disease-related studies while respecting homeopathic principles. Randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses are important for providing evidence but must be designed carefully to fit within homeopathic individualization and philosophy.
This document discusses research methodology and how it can be applied to homeopathy. It defines different types of study designs including observational studies, treatment studies, randomized controlled trials, and meta-analyses. It explains how to apply research methodologies like randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses to homeopathic drug provings and clinical research while respecting homeopathic principles. Clinical research in homeopathy should involve screening and confirming diagnoses, individualized case taking and prescribing for all patients regardless of group allocation in a blinded manner.
This document discusses health systems research and the research process. It defines research as seeking answers to unanswered questions through planned and systematic collection, analysis, and interpretation of data. The objectives of research can be theoretical, factual, or aimed at application. Characteristics of research include using valid methods to gather new knowledge or data and arriving at careful conclusions. Health systems research seeks to generate knowledge to promote population health. The research process involves selecting a problem, formulating hypotheses, developing a study plan, collecting and analyzing data, and formulating results.
Controlled experiments in psychology involve comparing an experimental group that receives a stimulus to a control group that does not. The key is keeping all other factors constant between the groups except for the stimulus being tested. Controlled experiments allow researchers to establish causation but lack real-world applicability due to their artificial environments. Quantitative research uses statistics and experiments to test hypotheses while qualitative research relies on naturalistic methods like interviews and observations to understand people's experiences.
This document provides an overview of evidence-based medicine (EBM). It defines EBM as systematically finding, appraising, and applying contemporaneous research findings to make clinical decisions. The key steps of EBM are asking a focused clinical question, searching for relevant evidence, critically appraising the evidence, applying valid evidence to the individual patient, and evaluating outcomes. High quality evidence comes from systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials. Practicing EBM helps ensure patients receive the best possible care based on the most current scientific knowledge.
Amanda WattenburgThursdayJul 26 at 724pmManage Discussioncheryllwashburn
Amanda Wattenburg
ThursdayJul 26 at 7:24pm
Manage Discussion Entry
Link to screen cast-o-matic:
https://screencast-o-matic.com/watch/cFitVbFMms (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
Script:
A brief introduction
Studying cognitive functioning is important as these processes impact individual’s behavior and emotions (Heeramun-Aubeeluck et al., 2015). Various factors can impact cognitive functioning. A disorder known to impact cognition is psychosis. Thus, it is essential to examine psychosis and how these psychotic experiences effect cognitive functioning over time.
Devise a specific research question related to the topic you chose in Week One.
How does psychosis effect cognitive functioning over time in patients who have experienced first-episode psychosis?
Explain the importance of the topic and research question.
Psychosis is a mental state in which individuals experience a loss of touch with reality(Boychuk, Lysaght, & Stuart, 2018). Psychosis may lead to additional occurrences or may indicate signs of a mental health disorder. It is important to examine the cognitive impairment that is caused as a result of psychotic episodes. In addition, this would unfold information that may lead to the importance of treating psychosis when the first signs are noticed in hopes of decreasing the chances of psychosis leading to a mental disorder.
A brief literature review
Zaytseva, Korsokava, Agius, & Gurovich (2013) and Bora & Murray (2014) discovered altered cognitive functioning exists prior to onset or before the prodrome stage. In addition, Bohus & Miclutia (2014) indicate that cognitive functioning at first-episode psychosis was not as strong. Thus, it can be concluded that cognitive functioning impairment occurs prior to first-episode onset however, there is varying research that indicates the impact on cognitive functioning as time goes on. Popolo, Vinci, & Balbi (2010) conducted a year-long study on neurocognitive functioning amongst children and adolescent patients with first-episode psychosis. Cognitive impairment is indicated in early psychosis onset thus the study focused on examining cognitive impairments. Several cognitive assessments were given to patients and the results were evaluated. The results of the cognitive assessments indicated that adolescents with first-episode psychosis (FEP) have neurocognitive impairments. In addition, psychotic patient’s cognitive deficiencies do not decline over the course of the psychotic disorder. However, according to the article
Neurocognitive functioning before and after the first psychotic episode: does psychosis result in cognitive deterioration? (2010)
, the results indicated that there is no decline in cognitive functioning during the first psychotic episode. This indicates a gap in research of the effect psychotic episodes has on cognitive functioning.
Evaluate published research studies on your topic found during your work on the Weeks One, Two, and ...
This document provides a critique of 4 recent meta-analyses published in Health Psychology. It finds problems with transparency and completeness in how the meta-analyses were reported. It also notes a dependence on small, underpowered original trials of generally poor quality. The document questions the clinical validity and utility of conclusions drawn from these meta-analyses due to issues like clinical heterogeneity among studies and lack of consideration of methodological quality. Overall, it aims to encourage more rigorous standards for meta-analyses to avoid inaccurate or exaggerated conclusions.
1. The Health Appraisal Questionnaire (HAQ) and Medical Symptoms Questionnaire (MSQ) were developed in the 1980s and 1990s as clinical and marketing tools to assess patient symptoms and health status.
2. While the HAQ and MSQ aim to provide a comprehensive overview of a patient's health, they have not undergone rigorous validation studies. The MSQ draws from the validated SF-36 Health Survey but is not itself validated.
3. Without validation, the ability of the HAQ and MSQ to reliably and accurately measure patient health as intended cannot be determined with high certainty. Validation involves comparing a tool to a gold standard and examining its consistency.
C O N C E P T A N A L Y S I SClinical reasoning concept a.docxclairbycraft
This document presents a concept analysis of clinical reasoning in nursing. It defines clinical reasoning as a complex cognitive process that uses cognition, metacognition, and discipline-specific knowledge to gather and analyze patient information, evaluate its significance, and weigh alternative actions. The analysis reviews literature on related concepts like decision-making and problem-solving. It identifies attributes of clinical reasoning like the use of heuristics and how clinical reasoning abilities develop with increased experience and knowledge. Further research is needed to better understand and measure clinical reasoning.
The document discusses evidence-based nursing practice. It defines evidence-based practice as integrating the best research evidence, clinical expertise, and patient values and needs. The key steps in evidence-based practice are asking questions, acquiring evidence, appraising the evidence, applying it to a patient, and evaluating outcomes. Barriers to evidence-based nursing include lack of time and resources, as well as difficulties interpreting and applying research. Facilitators include administrative support and accessible, clearly written research. Maximizing evidence-based nursing requires overcoming barriers, incorporating different types of evidence, and accounting for issues beyond measurement like patient preferences.
Describe the experimental, observational, survey, and case study met.pdfsktambifortune
Describe the experimental, observational, survey, and case study methods of conducting
psychological research. Include a discussion of how each addresses independent, dependent, and
extraneous variables, the relative advantages and disadvantages of each method, and how (or if)
each method can be conducted in the three developmental methodologies
Solution
There are several methods that are used for reseach in psychology. These approaches vary by the
sources of information which is drawn on, how that information is sampled, and the types of
instruments that are utilized in data collection. It also depends if the methods collect qualitative
data, quantitative data or both of them.
Qualitative psychological researches are those where the research findings are not arrived at by
statistical or other quantitative procedures.Quantitative psychological research is where the
research findings result from mathematical modeling and statistical estimation or statistical
inference. Since qualitative information can be handled as such statistically, the distinction
relates to approach, rather than the topic studied.
Experimental Method
The field of psychology commonly uses experimental approaches in what is best known as
experimental psychology. Researchers design experiments to test specific hypotheses aka
deductive approach, or to evaluate functional relationships aka inductive approach. The method
of experimentation involves an experimenter changing some influence on the research subjects,
and studying the effects it produces on an expected aspect of the subjects behaviour or
experience. Other variables researchers consider in experimentation are known as the extraneous
variables, and are either controllable or confounding
Observational Methods:
Observational research is a type of non-experimental, correlational research. It involves the
researcher observing the ongoing behaviour of their subjects. There are multiple approaches of
observational research such as participant observations, non-participant observations and
naturalistic observations
Survey Method:
Most of the interviews intrude as a foreign element into thesocial setting that they describe. They
create as well as measure attitudes, they play vital role and responsibility. Though they are
limited to those who are accessible and who will cooperate, but the responses obtained are
produced in part by dimensions of individual differences irrelevantto the concerned topic under
discussion.
Case Study Method:
Normally case study is an intensive analysis of a person, group, or event that stresses
developmental factors related to the topic. Case studies may as well be descriptive or
explanatory. Explanatory case studies explore causation to figure out the underlying principles.
But there often is a debate to whether case studies count as a scientific research method or not.
Clinical psychologists use case studies most often, especially to describe abnormal events and
conditions, which are particularly .
Guide for conducting meta analysis in health researchYogitha P
This document discusses meta-analysis and its role in evidence-based dentistry. It defines meta-analysis as the statistical analysis and synthesis of data from multiple scientific studies. Meta-analysis enhances the reliability of conclusions by increasing statistical power and limiting bias compared to individual studies. It can help resolve scientific controversies by establishing whether findings are consistent across studies. The document reviews the steps in conducting a meta-analysis, including developing a clear question and protocol, performing comprehensive literature searches, assessing study quality, extracting outcome data, conducting statistical analyses, and drawing conclusions. It also discusses potential biases and strengths and limitations of meta-analysis.
1. The document outlines different types of research designs - descriptive studies that observe phenomena without manipulation, and experimental studies that intentionally introduce a treatment and observe the results.
2. Descriptive studies collect information to demonstrate relationships, while experimental studies test hypotheses by manipulating variables and using control groups.
3. Research design provides a framework and plan to address research questions while maintaining integrity, protecting subjects, and minimizing bias. The chosen design depends on the question, resources, and feasibility.
This paper outlines a quantitative research methodology to examine blind baseball ergonomics and safety design. The research will involve 3 experiments: 1) comparing the process of playing beep baseball for the visually impaired vs. sighted people with blindfolds, 2) comparing the hearing acuity of visually impaired baseball players vs. non-players, and 3) evaluating the effectiveness of current aids/tools vs. new technologies. Quantitative methods are appropriate because the research involves clearly defined, measurable variables and a structured experimental design. The most suitable quantitative methods are experimental, quasi-experimental, and causal-comparative research designs.
This study examined the effectiveness of different methods for teaching clinical reasoning skills to occupational therapy students. 80 students over 3 years received varying levels of exposure to in-class evaluations with clients as part of their clinical reasoning seminar in the first year. Students who participated in the in-class evaluations during their first year performed significantly better on evaluations in their second-year classroom-as-clinic experience compared to students without this experience. Students who had a physical dysfunction fieldwork also performed better than those without any fieldwork. The results suggest that in-class evaluations can improve students' clinical reasoning abilities.
This document provides strategies for helping 9th grade math students effectively manage their time. It recommends incorporating daily review activities at the start of class to minimize wasted time. Students should be taught self-monitoring skills to stay on-task during independent work periods. Establishing routines and providing a syllabus can help students prioritize assignments. Frequent praise and rewards can also encourage students to meet deadlines. Overall, these time management strategies are aimed at enhancing learning for 14-year-old students.
The document discusses the primary steps and process for requesting and obtaining writing assistance through the HelpWriting.net website. It outlines 5 main steps: 1) Creating an account with valid email and password. 2) Completing a 10-minute order form providing instructions, sources, and deadline. 3) Reviewing bids from writers and choosing one based on qualifications. 4) Receiving the paper and authorizing payment if pleased. 5) Having the option to request revisions to ensure satisfaction, with a refund offered for plagiarized work. The document promotes the website's writing assistance services.
More Related Content
Similar to A Method For The Study Of Medical Thinking And Problem Solving
Application Of Statistical Process Control In Manufacturing Company To Unders...Martha Brown
This document describes a systematic review of 57 studies on the application of statistical process control (SPC) in healthcare quality improvement. The review found that SPC was applied in a wide range of healthcare settings and specialties using 97 different variables. Benefits identified included helping various stakeholders manage change and improve processes. Limitations included the complexity of correctly applying SPC. Barriers were things like lack of staff training, while factors facilitating use included leadership support and data feedback. Overall, SPC was found to be a versatile tool for quality improvement when applied appropriately.
EVIDENCE –BASED PRACTICES 1
Evidence-Based Practices
Stephanie Petit-homme
Miami Regional University
Professor: Garcia Mercedes
07/05/2021
Evidence-Based Practices to Guide Clinical Practices
In other terms recognized as evidence-based medication, evidence-based scientific practice is elucidated as the careful, obvious, and judicious use of the best indication in creating results for the outstanding care of separate patients. It helps those who brand the choices to device best healthcare practices while drawing the roadmaps for the health system. In clinical trials, the integration of the EBCP entails clinical respiratory medicine considers two fundamental principles. For example, the principle is the hierarchy of the evidence and the art of clinical decision-making.
The interrelationship between the theory, research, and EBP
The relationship between the theory, research, and the EBP supports the three recognition programs. They still relate in terms of the magnet model component of modern knowledge, innovation, and advancement. They describe in a way in which they lead to the promotion of quality in a setting that makes supports professional practices. Second, there is the identification of excellence in giving nursing services to sick people or the people who stay around. For instance, the model, which is other terms the magnet theory, has got five components ( Reddy, 2018).
The first constituent includes transformational management; the additional is structural authorization. The third one is archetypal specialized practices, new information, invention, and upgrading. Lastly, in the model, there are the empirical quality outcomes. For the achievement of the aims of the goals that have been set, there is a need to make sure that the theory, current knowledge innovation, and the improvements and the components that are found in view all the nurses who are located in the levels of the healthcare company need to get involved.
The research has its primary purpose for the help of coming up with knowledge or the validation done for the knowledge that has always been there from before based on the theory. There is systematic, scientific questioning in the research to give the answers to some of the specific questions. It can use the test hypotheses and the rigorous method, the primary purpose of the study being for investigation knowing of the new things and the exploration. There is a need to understand the philosophy of science.
Second, on the EBP, there is no development of the new knowledge or even the learning being validated. The primary purpose of the EBP is to translate the evidence and then apply it to medical executive. It uses the indication available to brand patient-care choices. The EBP goes yonder the exploration as fine as the persevering penchants and ideals. The EBP retains into deliberation that the best indication is for the opinion leaders and the experts. Even though there is the existence of definitiv ...
Concepts For Clinical Judgment Discussion Module 3.docxstudywriters
The document discusses a research article about clinical judgment in nursing. It finds that clinical judgment is influenced more by what nurses bring to a situation than objective data alone. Experience, knowledge, intuition and reflection all contribute to developing strong clinical judgment. The document presents a model of clinical judgment that emphasizes how a nurse's background, the context of the situation, and their relationship with patients shape what they notice and how they assess patients.
This document discusses research methodology and how it can be applied to homeopathy. It defines different types of study designs including observational studies, treatment studies, randomized controlled trials, and meta-analyses. It explains how to apply these research methodologies to homeopathy through drug provings, clinical research studies, and disease-related studies while respecting homeopathic principles. Randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses are important for providing evidence but must be designed carefully to fit within homeopathic individualization and philosophy.
This document discusses research methodology and how it can be applied to homeopathy. It defines different types of study designs including observational studies, treatment studies, randomized controlled trials, and meta-analyses. It explains how to apply research methodologies like randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses to homeopathic drug provings and clinical research while respecting homeopathic principles. Clinical research in homeopathy should involve screening and confirming diagnoses, individualized case taking and prescribing for all patients regardless of group allocation in a blinded manner.
This document discusses health systems research and the research process. It defines research as seeking answers to unanswered questions through planned and systematic collection, analysis, and interpretation of data. The objectives of research can be theoretical, factual, or aimed at application. Characteristics of research include using valid methods to gather new knowledge or data and arriving at careful conclusions. Health systems research seeks to generate knowledge to promote population health. The research process involves selecting a problem, formulating hypotheses, developing a study plan, collecting and analyzing data, and formulating results.
Controlled experiments in psychology involve comparing an experimental group that receives a stimulus to a control group that does not. The key is keeping all other factors constant between the groups except for the stimulus being tested. Controlled experiments allow researchers to establish causation but lack real-world applicability due to their artificial environments. Quantitative research uses statistics and experiments to test hypotheses while qualitative research relies on naturalistic methods like interviews and observations to understand people's experiences.
This document provides an overview of evidence-based medicine (EBM). It defines EBM as systematically finding, appraising, and applying contemporaneous research findings to make clinical decisions. The key steps of EBM are asking a focused clinical question, searching for relevant evidence, critically appraising the evidence, applying valid evidence to the individual patient, and evaluating outcomes. High quality evidence comes from systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials. Practicing EBM helps ensure patients receive the best possible care based on the most current scientific knowledge.
Amanda WattenburgThursdayJul 26 at 724pmManage Discussioncheryllwashburn
Amanda Wattenburg
ThursdayJul 26 at 7:24pm
Manage Discussion Entry
Link to screen cast-o-matic:
https://screencast-o-matic.com/watch/cFitVbFMms (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
Script:
A brief introduction
Studying cognitive functioning is important as these processes impact individual’s behavior and emotions (Heeramun-Aubeeluck et al., 2015). Various factors can impact cognitive functioning. A disorder known to impact cognition is psychosis. Thus, it is essential to examine psychosis and how these psychotic experiences effect cognitive functioning over time.
Devise a specific research question related to the topic you chose in Week One.
How does psychosis effect cognitive functioning over time in patients who have experienced first-episode psychosis?
Explain the importance of the topic and research question.
Psychosis is a mental state in which individuals experience a loss of touch with reality(Boychuk, Lysaght, & Stuart, 2018). Psychosis may lead to additional occurrences or may indicate signs of a mental health disorder. It is important to examine the cognitive impairment that is caused as a result of psychotic episodes. In addition, this would unfold information that may lead to the importance of treating psychosis when the first signs are noticed in hopes of decreasing the chances of psychosis leading to a mental disorder.
A brief literature review
Zaytseva, Korsokava, Agius, & Gurovich (2013) and Bora & Murray (2014) discovered altered cognitive functioning exists prior to onset or before the prodrome stage. In addition, Bohus & Miclutia (2014) indicate that cognitive functioning at first-episode psychosis was not as strong. Thus, it can be concluded that cognitive functioning impairment occurs prior to first-episode onset however, there is varying research that indicates the impact on cognitive functioning as time goes on. Popolo, Vinci, & Balbi (2010) conducted a year-long study on neurocognitive functioning amongst children and adolescent patients with first-episode psychosis. Cognitive impairment is indicated in early psychosis onset thus the study focused on examining cognitive impairments. Several cognitive assessments were given to patients and the results were evaluated. The results of the cognitive assessments indicated that adolescents with first-episode psychosis (FEP) have neurocognitive impairments. In addition, psychotic patient’s cognitive deficiencies do not decline over the course of the psychotic disorder. However, according to the article
Neurocognitive functioning before and after the first psychotic episode: does psychosis result in cognitive deterioration? (2010)
, the results indicated that there is no decline in cognitive functioning during the first psychotic episode. This indicates a gap in research of the effect psychotic episodes has on cognitive functioning.
Evaluate published research studies on your topic found during your work on the Weeks One, Two, and ...
This document provides a critique of 4 recent meta-analyses published in Health Psychology. It finds problems with transparency and completeness in how the meta-analyses were reported. It also notes a dependence on small, underpowered original trials of generally poor quality. The document questions the clinical validity and utility of conclusions drawn from these meta-analyses due to issues like clinical heterogeneity among studies and lack of consideration of methodological quality. Overall, it aims to encourage more rigorous standards for meta-analyses to avoid inaccurate or exaggerated conclusions.
1. The Health Appraisal Questionnaire (HAQ) and Medical Symptoms Questionnaire (MSQ) were developed in the 1980s and 1990s as clinical and marketing tools to assess patient symptoms and health status.
2. While the HAQ and MSQ aim to provide a comprehensive overview of a patient's health, they have not undergone rigorous validation studies. The MSQ draws from the validated SF-36 Health Survey but is not itself validated.
3. Without validation, the ability of the HAQ and MSQ to reliably and accurately measure patient health as intended cannot be determined with high certainty. Validation involves comparing a tool to a gold standard and examining its consistency.
C O N C E P T A N A L Y S I SClinical reasoning concept a.docxclairbycraft
This document presents a concept analysis of clinical reasoning in nursing. It defines clinical reasoning as a complex cognitive process that uses cognition, metacognition, and discipline-specific knowledge to gather and analyze patient information, evaluate its significance, and weigh alternative actions. The analysis reviews literature on related concepts like decision-making and problem-solving. It identifies attributes of clinical reasoning like the use of heuristics and how clinical reasoning abilities develop with increased experience and knowledge. Further research is needed to better understand and measure clinical reasoning.
The document discusses evidence-based nursing practice. It defines evidence-based practice as integrating the best research evidence, clinical expertise, and patient values and needs. The key steps in evidence-based practice are asking questions, acquiring evidence, appraising the evidence, applying it to a patient, and evaluating outcomes. Barriers to evidence-based nursing include lack of time and resources, as well as difficulties interpreting and applying research. Facilitators include administrative support and accessible, clearly written research. Maximizing evidence-based nursing requires overcoming barriers, incorporating different types of evidence, and accounting for issues beyond measurement like patient preferences.
Describe the experimental, observational, survey, and case study met.pdfsktambifortune
Describe the experimental, observational, survey, and case study methods of conducting
psychological research. Include a discussion of how each addresses independent, dependent, and
extraneous variables, the relative advantages and disadvantages of each method, and how (or if)
each method can be conducted in the three developmental methodologies
Solution
There are several methods that are used for reseach in psychology. These approaches vary by the
sources of information which is drawn on, how that information is sampled, and the types of
instruments that are utilized in data collection. It also depends if the methods collect qualitative
data, quantitative data or both of them.
Qualitative psychological researches are those where the research findings are not arrived at by
statistical or other quantitative procedures.Quantitative psychological research is where the
research findings result from mathematical modeling and statistical estimation or statistical
inference. Since qualitative information can be handled as such statistically, the distinction
relates to approach, rather than the topic studied.
Experimental Method
The field of psychology commonly uses experimental approaches in what is best known as
experimental psychology. Researchers design experiments to test specific hypotheses aka
deductive approach, or to evaluate functional relationships aka inductive approach. The method
of experimentation involves an experimenter changing some influence on the research subjects,
and studying the effects it produces on an expected aspect of the subjects behaviour or
experience. Other variables researchers consider in experimentation are known as the extraneous
variables, and are either controllable or confounding
Observational Methods:
Observational research is a type of non-experimental, correlational research. It involves the
researcher observing the ongoing behaviour of their subjects. There are multiple approaches of
observational research such as participant observations, non-participant observations and
naturalistic observations
Survey Method:
Most of the interviews intrude as a foreign element into thesocial setting that they describe. They
create as well as measure attitudes, they play vital role and responsibility. Though they are
limited to those who are accessible and who will cooperate, but the responses obtained are
produced in part by dimensions of individual differences irrelevantto the concerned topic under
discussion.
Case Study Method:
Normally case study is an intensive analysis of a person, group, or event that stresses
developmental factors related to the topic. Case studies may as well be descriptive or
explanatory. Explanatory case studies explore causation to figure out the underlying principles.
But there often is a debate to whether case studies count as a scientific research method or not.
Clinical psychologists use case studies most often, especially to describe abnormal events and
conditions, which are particularly .
Guide for conducting meta analysis in health researchYogitha P
This document discusses meta-analysis and its role in evidence-based dentistry. It defines meta-analysis as the statistical analysis and synthesis of data from multiple scientific studies. Meta-analysis enhances the reliability of conclusions by increasing statistical power and limiting bias compared to individual studies. It can help resolve scientific controversies by establishing whether findings are consistent across studies. The document reviews the steps in conducting a meta-analysis, including developing a clear question and protocol, performing comprehensive literature searches, assessing study quality, extracting outcome data, conducting statistical analyses, and drawing conclusions. It also discusses potential biases and strengths and limitations of meta-analysis.
1. The document outlines different types of research designs - descriptive studies that observe phenomena without manipulation, and experimental studies that intentionally introduce a treatment and observe the results.
2. Descriptive studies collect information to demonstrate relationships, while experimental studies test hypotheses by manipulating variables and using control groups.
3. Research design provides a framework and plan to address research questions while maintaining integrity, protecting subjects, and minimizing bias. The chosen design depends on the question, resources, and feasibility.
This paper outlines a quantitative research methodology to examine blind baseball ergonomics and safety design. The research will involve 3 experiments: 1) comparing the process of playing beep baseball for the visually impaired vs. sighted people with blindfolds, 2) comparing the hearing acuity of visually impaired baseball players vs. non-players, and 3) evaluating the effectiveness of current aids/tools vs. new technologies. Quantitative methods are appropriate because the research involves clearly defined, measurable variables and a structured experimental design. The most suitable quantitative methods are experimental, quasi-experimental, and causal-comparative research designs.
This study examined the effectiveness of different methods for teaching clinical reasoning skills to occupational therapy students. 80 students over 3 years received varying levels of exposure to in-class evaluations with clients as part of their clinical reasoning seminar in the first year. Students who participated in the in-class evaluations during their first year performed significantly better on evaluations in their second-year classroom-as-clinic experience compared to students without this experience. Students who had a physical dysfunction fieldwork also performed better than those without any fieldwork. The results suggest that in-class evaluations can improve students' clinical reasoning abilities.
Similar to A Method For The Study Of Medical Thinking And Problem Solving (20)
This document provides strategies for helping 9th grade math students effectively manage their time. It recommends incorporating daily review activities at the start of class to minimize wasted time. Students should be taught self-monitoring skills to stay on-task during independent work periods. Establishing routines and providing a syllabus can help students prioritize assignments. Frequent praise and rewards can also encourage students to meet deadlines. Overall, these time management strategies are aimed at enhancing learning for 14-year-old students.
The document discusses the primary steps and process for requesting and obtaining writing assistance through the HelpWriting.net website. It outlines 5 main steps: 1) Creating an account with valid email and password. 2) Completing a 10-minute order form providing instructions, sources, and deadline. 3) Reviewing bids from writers and choosing one based on qualifications. 4) Receiving the paper and authorizing payment if pleased. 5) Having the option to request revisions to ensure satisfaction, with a refund offered for plagiarized work. The document promotes the website's writing assistance services.
Thesis Statement Structure. Thesis And Purpose StateBecky Gilbert
The document provides instructions for creating an account on HelpWriting.net in order to request writing assistance. It outlines a 5-step process: 1) Create an account with a password and email. 2) Complete an order form with instructions, sources, and deadline. 3) Review bids from writers and choose one. 4) Receive the paper and authorize payment if satisfied. 5) Request revisions until fully satisfied, with a refund option for plagiarized work. The goal is to ensure students receive original, high-quality content through a simple online process.
How To Write A Good Personal Essay For Scholarships - SoBecky Gilbert
This document provides instructions for creating an account and submitting assignment requests on the HelpWriting.net website. It outlines a 5-step process:
1. Create an account by providing a password and email.
2. Complete an order form with instructions, sources, and deadline to request a "Write My Paper For Me" assignment.
3. Review bids from writers and select one based on qualifications and reviews.
4. Review the completed paper and authorize payment if satisfied. Free revisions are allowed.
5. Request multiple revisions to ensure satisfaction. Plagiarized work will be refunded.
The document discusses artificial neural networks (ANN) as a type of machine learning where systems are trained to infer patterns from data through supervised learning by being given input-output examples to learn a mapping between inputs and outputs to approximate functions. ANNs are inspired by biological neural networks and are designed to mimic their learning abilities through a network of interconnected nodes that can learn relationships and patterns in data through experience.
Critical Lens Essay Writing Guide By EssayHub ExpertsBecky Gilbert
The document provides guidance on using the writing service HelpWriting.net. It outlines a 5-step process: 1) Create an account with a password and email. 2) Complete a 10-minute order form providing instructions, sources, and deadline. 3) Review bids from writers and choose one based on qualifications. 4) Review the completed paper and authorize payment if satisfied. 5) Request revisions until fully satisfied, with a refund option for plagiarized work. The service aims to provide original, high-quality content meeting customers' needs.
How To Write An Analytical Essay - How To Write An ABecky Gilbert
The document provides instructions for creating an account and submitting a request for an assignment writing service on the HelpWriting.net website. It outlines a 5-step process: 1) Create an account with an email and password. 2) Complete an order form with instructions, sources, and deadline. 3) Review bids from writers and select one. 4) Review the completed paper and authorize payment. 5) Request revisions until satisfied with the work. The document promises original, high-quality content and refunds for plagiarized work.
Halloween Ghost Writing Paper By LisaS Learning SBecky Gilbert
This document discusses the Chernobyl nuclear disaster that occurred in 1986 at a nuclear power plant in Ukraine. It provides background details on the disaster, noting that it was caused by flawed Soviet reactor design, severe mistakes made by plant operators, and a lack of safety culture. The accident resulted in a steam explosion and fires that emitted radioactive reactor core material into the atmosphere. The Chernobyl disaster was unique as it is the only nuclear power accident that caused radiation-related deaths and illnesses.
The document provides instructions for completing an assignment request on the HelpWriting.net website. It outlines a 5-step process: 1) Create an account with a password and email. 2) Complete a 10-minute order form providing instructions, sources, and deadline. 3) Review bids from writers and select one based on qualifications. 4) Review the completed paper and authorize payment if satisfied. 5) Request revisions until fully satisfied, with the option of a refund for plagiarized work. The process aims to match clients with qualified writers to complete assignments through a bidding system while ensuring client satisfaction.
The document discusses the information processing theory of cognitive development. It states that this theory views the mind as operating similar to a computer, which processes information from the environment. The key components of the mind according to this theory are attention mechanisms which bring in information, working memory which temporarily stores and manipulates information, and long-term memory which archives information that can be recalled later. Memory is responsible for encoding, storing, and recalling information and allows for learning and adaptation through experiences.
010 Spongebob Writing Essay Humour And Squarepants Slap Happy Larry PaBecky Gilbert
This document provides instructions for requesting writing assistance from HelpWriting.net. It outlines a 5-step process: 1) Create an account with a password and email. 2) Complete a 10-minute order form providing instructions, sources, and deadline. 3) Review bids from writers and choose one based on qualifications. 4) Review the completed paper and authorize payment if satisfied. 5) Request revisions until fully satisfied, with a refund option for plagiarized content.
Cheap Essay Writing Services Australia AssBecky Gilbert
The document discusses a website called HelpWriting.net that provides essay writing services, with a 5 step process for students to request papers: registering an account, completing an order form, choosing a writer through competitive bidding, reviewing and authorizing payment for completed papers, and requesting revisions if needed. The site promises original, high-quality papers and refunds for any cases of plagiarism.
How To Write A Proposal Letter Business Proposal EBecky Gilbert
1. The document analyzes demographic and socioeconomic data from 203 US Metropolitan Statistical Areas between 2006 and 2012, focusing on population changes, family structures, age distribution, and economic conditions.
2. It finds that as more women enter the workforce and medical advances increase lifespans, populations are aging overall while family structures shift away from stay-at-home spouses.
3. New businesses and industries moving to cities can boost local economies by attracting working populations, though demographic changes may pose challenges that require policy responses to help areas maintain their populations.
How Do I Write An Introduction For An EssBecky Gilbert
The document discusses the film Casablanca, praising its Academy Award wins but also critiquing aspects of its production. It notes the film went through multiple writers and title changes before release. While the final film was well-received, the critique argues parts of the scriptwriting process were disorganized as writers were replaced. Overall, the document provides historical context about the film's development while also raising points of criticism around its writing.
The document provides instructions for creating an account and requesting essay writing help on the HelpWriting.net website. It outlines a 5-step process: 1) Create an account with an email and password. 2) Complete a 10-minute order form providing instructions, sources, and deadline. 3) Writers will bid on the request and the customer can choose a writer. 4) The customer will receive the paper and can request revisions if needed. 5) HelpWriting.net promises original, high-quality content and refunds for plagiarized work.
How To Become A Good Writer 21 Awesome TipsBecky Gilbert
The document provides tips for using the HelpWriting.net service to have papers written. It outlines the 5 main steps: 1) Create an account; 2) Submit a request with instructions and deadline; 3) Review bids from writers and select one; 4) Review the paper and authorize payment; 5) Request revisions until satisfied. The service uses a bidding system for requests and promises original, high-quality work or a full refund.
001 Essay Plan Template Intro And Body ParagraBecky Gilbert
This document provides instructions for requesting assignment writing help from HelpWriting.net in 5 steps: 1) Create an account, 2) Complete a order form providing instructions, sources, and deadline, 3) Review bids from writers and choose one, 4) Review the completed paper and authorize payment, 5) Request revisions to ensure satisfaction and receive a refund for plagiarized work. The process aims to match clients with qualified writers and provide original, high-quality content through revisions.
How To Write A Character Analysis Essay Outline, TiBecky Gilbert
The document provides instructions for requesting writing assistance from HelpWriting.net. It outlines a 5-step process: 1) Create an account with a password and email. 2) Complete a 10-minute order form providing instructions, sources, and deadline. 3) Review bids from writers and choose one. 4) Review the completed paper and authorize payment. 5) Request revisions until satisfied, with a refund option for plagiarized content.
The passage discusses the impact of modern property development on people. It notes that modernity is characterized by a break from tradition and the rise of tall buildings, skyscrapers, and large constructions. This is partly due to increasing world population and land shortage in urban areas. While modern developments provide needed housing, they can have negative environmental impacts like pollution and limiting access to fresh air and sunlight for local residents. The passage examines these issues and debates the tradeoffs of modern property development.
Writing Concept Papers. Coursework And Essay WBecky Gilbert
Elie Wiesel survived the concentration camps for several reasons: he had a reason to live which kept him fighting to survive; he was afraid of death and fought to avoid it; and he was physically able to pass the selection processes. Other Jews survived for similar reasons, having qualities, views, and traits that allowed them to endure the extreme conditions. It was remarkable that anyone was able to survive such cruel camps. A major factor for Elie was his family, especially his father, who he struggled to care for and protect.
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 InventoryCeline George
In this slide, we'll explore how to set up warehouses and locations in Odoo 17 Inventory. This will help us manage our stock effectively, track inventory levels, and streamline warehouse operations.
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation resultsKrassimira Luka
The temple and the sanctuary around were dedicated to Asklepios Zmidrenus. This name has been known since 1875 when an inscription dedicated to him was discovered in Rome. The inscription is dated in 227 AD and was left by soldiers originating from the city of Philippopolis (modern Plovdiv).
Leveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit InnovationTechSoup
In this webinar, participants learned how to utilize Generative AI to streamline operations and elevate member engagement. Amazon Web Service experts provided a customer specific use cases and dived into low/no-code tools that are quick and easy to deploy through Amazon Web Service (AWS.)
Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...PsychoTech Services
A proprietary approach developed by bringing together the best of learning theories from Psychology, design principles from the world of visualization, and pedagogical methods from over a decade of training experience, that enables you to: Learn better, faster!
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptxEduSkills OECD
Iván Bornacelly, Policy Analyst at the OECD Centre for Skills, OECD, presents at the webinar 'Tackling job market gaps with a skills-first approach' on 12 June 2024
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docxadhitya5119
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
हिंदी वर्णमाला पीपीटी, hindi alphabet PPT presentation, hindi varnamala PPT, Hindi Varnamala pdf, हिंदी स्वर, हिंदी व्यंजन, sikhiye hindi varnmala, dr. mulla adam ali, hindi language and literature, hindi alphabet with drawing, hindi alphabet pdf, hindi varnamala for childrens, hindi language, hindi varnamala practice for kids, https://www.drmullaadamali.com
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...PECB
Denis is a dynamic and results-driven Chief Information Officer (CIO) with a distinguished career spanning information systems analysis and technical project management. With a proven track record of spearheading the design and delivery of cutting-edge Information Management solutions, he has consistently elevated business operations, streamlined reporting functions, and maximized process efficiency.
Certified as an ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Lead Implementer, Data Protection Officer, and Cyber Risks Analyst, Denis brings a heightened focus on data security, privacy, and cyber resilience to every endeavor.
His expertise extends across a diverse spectrum of reporting, database, and web development applications, underpinned by an exceptional grasp of data storage and virtualization technologies. His proficiency in application testing, database administration, and data cleansing ensures seamless execution of complex projects.
What sets Denis apart is his comprehensive understanding of Business and Systems Analysis technologies, honed through involvement in all phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). From meticulous requirements gathering to precise analysis, innovative design, rigorous development, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: May 29, 2024
Tags: Information Security, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, GDPR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System - EN | PECB
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Training Courses - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about PECB:
Website: https://pecb.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION
Communicating effectively and consistently with students can help them feel at ease during their learning experience and provide the instructor with a communication trail to track the course's progress. This workshop will take you through constructing an engaging course container to facilitate effective communication.
Constructing Your Course Container for Effective Communication
A Method For The Study Of Medical Thinking And Problem Solving
1. DOCUMENT RESUME
ED 050 164 TM 000 557
AUTHOR
TITLE
INSTITUTION
PUE DATE
NOTE
HES PRICE
DESCRIPTORS
AESTRACT
Elstein, Arthur S.; Shulman, Lee S.
A Method for the Study of Medical Thinking and
Problem Solving.
Michigan State Univ., 'East Lansing.
Fet 71
31p. ; Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the
American Educational Research Association, New York,
New York, February 1971
EDRS Price MF-$0.65 HC-$3.29
*Clinical riagncsis, Cognitive Measurement,
*Critical Thinking, Data Analysis, Decision Making
Skills, Hypothesis Testing, Medical Education,
Medical Evaluation, *Physicians, Protlem Solving,
Rating Scales, Research Design, Scientific
Attitudes, *Scientific Methodology, *Simulation,
Video Tape Recordings
A method fcr studying medical reasoning in a
life-like setting is reported. Simulated medical problems, amplified
by concurrent thinking aloud, episodic retrospection durino the
work-up, and videotape-stimulateC retrospection, are used to obtain
records of the behavior and reasoning physicians use to solve
diagnostic prchlems. The fundamenal units of analysis are questions,
critical findings, and hypotheses. Fight categories cf questions
relate the information seeking behavior of the inquiring physician to
a widely accepted outline for medical history taking. Critical
findings in a case are elicited by questions and are assigned weights
depending upon their relation to any conceivable diagnostic
hypothesis. Hypotheses tested by an inquirer are identified from his
thinking aloud and retrospection. Findings elicited are evaluated in
relation to inquirer's hypotheses or tc those he might have
considered but did not. Medical diagnosis is thus analyzed as a
special case cf hypothesis testing. The method is illustrated by
application to two work-ups of the same protlem; one globally rated
substantially Letter than the other. The method etfectively
distinguishes tetween the two in psychologically relevant ways.
Discussion rElates the findings tc current work in problem solving.
(Author)
2. A METHOD FOR THE STUDY OF MEDICAL THINKING AND PROBLEM SOLVING
Arthur S. Elstein and Lee S. Shulman
Michigan State University
Abstract
A method for studying medical reasoning in a life-like setting is reported.
Simulated medical problems, amplified by concurrent thinking aloud, episodic retro-
spection during the work-up, and videotape-stimulated retrospection, are used to obtain
records of the behavior and reasoning physicians use to solve diagnostic problems.
The fundamental units of analysis are questions, critical findings, and hypotheses.
Eight categories of questions relate the information seeking behavior of the inquiring
physician to a widely accepted outline for medical history taking. Critical findings
in a case are elicited by questions and are assigned weights depending upon their
relation to any conceivable diagnostic hypothesis. Hypotheses tested by an inquirer
are identified from his thinking aloud and retrospection. Findings elicited are
evaluated in relation to inquirer's hypotheses or to those he might have considered
but did not. Medical diagnosis is thus analyzed as a special case of hypothesis
testing. The method is illustrated by application to two work-ups of the same problem;
one globally rated substantially better than the other. The method effectively dis-
tinguishes between the two in psychologically relevant ways. Discussion relates the
findings to current work in problem solving.
U.S. OEPARTMENT
OF HEALTH. EOUCATION
& WELFARE
OFFICE OF
THIS DOCUMENT HAS
BEEN
EOUCATION
REPRODUCED
EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM
THE PERSON OR
ORGANIZATION ORIGINATING
IT. POINTS OF
VIEW OR OPINIONS STATED
DO NOT NECES
SARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL
OFFICE OF EDU
CATION POSITION OR POLICY.
3. PRE - PUBLICATION DRAFT - NOT FOR CITATION
A METHOD FOR THE STUDY OF MEDICAL THINKING AND PROBLEM SOLVING*
Arthur S. Elstein and Lee S. Shulman
Michigan State University
We are investigating medical thinking as a paradigm of reasoning and prob-
lem solving in a practical domain. We have chosen not to employ an experimental
setting that is devoid of "life-like" elements, as have been the characteristic
investigations in cognitive psychology, with their concept attainment boards
(Bruner, Goodnow and Austin, 1956), memory drums or Towers of Hanoi (Simon, 1970).
Instead, we are focusing on studies of an actual cognitive activity, medical
problem solving, conducted by experienced practitioners in settings as natural as
the requirements of disciplined inquiry permit. We then propose to generalize
from the findings of these studies to other similar domains, arguing that they
possess characteristics analogous to those of the medical problem solving situation.
Schwab (1969), for example, argues that medicine is a far more appropriate analogue
to curriculum development and educational decision-making than are the theoretical
disciplines most often looked to for guidance in that field.
This paper describes the development and initial testing of a method for
scoring and evaluating the problem solving of experienced physicians as they per-
form diagnostic work in a simulated medical setting. The paper discusses the
aims which directed our choice of a particular scoring system; specifies the
precise manner in which the data-are collected and subsequently scored; and
reports the results of a pilot attempt to investigate the success of the scoring
system in meeting the criteria enunciated.
r
7'1 *
:4
This research is supported in part by NIH Grant PM-00041 to the Office of
Medical Education Research and Development, Michigan State University.
2
4. -2-
In weighting alternative methods of scoring medical problem solving proto-
cols, four major criteria were used:
1. The method must be objective and reliable. That is, given
formal statements of the rule for each scoring category
independent judges ought to reach at least 85% agreement
on the specific categories to which any particular unit
of behavior is assigned.
2. The method must reflect the critical and relevant charac-
teristics of the particular mode of cognitive functioning
under study. Thus, in assigning scores or weights to as-
pects of the observed behavior, the scoring system should
draw attention to the clearly more relevant aspects of the
functioning and pay less or no heed to the irrelevant as-
pects.
3. The scoring system should measure aspects of the activity
under study that can be related to parallel variables in
other theories of problem solving and/or studies of similar
processes in other content domains. That is, the scoring
system should not only be a description of subject perfor-
mance in medically relevant terms, but should also afford a
way of describing the cognitive functioning of t.le subject
that is meaningful in the light of broader theories of cog-
nitive functioning and problem solving.
3
5. -3-
4. The specific scores or assessments generated by the scoring
procedure ought to result in scores which distinguish effec-
tively between clearly different levels of competence in
medical functioning. That is, the scoring system will demon-
strate its validity through effectively discriminating be-
tween levels of competent performance.
These then are the four desiderata which directed the formulation of the
present scoring system. We now move to a description of the specific charac-
teristics of the scoring procedures themselves.
COLLECTING THE BASIC DATA
Simulated medical cases based on actual clinical records are used to ob-
serve, in moderately controlled circumstances, the procedures by which physicians
gather data and reason clinically (Kagan, Elstein, Jason, Shulman and Loupe, 1970).
A room has been designed to resemble a physician's office; two television cameras
are mounted near the ceiling and the entire interaction between the doctor and
the simulated patient is videotaped. Actors have been carefully trained to simu-
late patients in these problems. The information potentially available to each
physician-subject is thus known, so that different physicians may be observed
while solving the same diagnostic problem. Historical data, physical findings,
and laboratory examinations are all available upon request. It is stressed to the
physician-subject that he is free to elicit as much or as little data as he feels
is necessary for adequate solution of the diagnostic problem, and that he may
4
6. -4-
elicit these data in any order that he chooses. He is asked to work in his
customary manner and to do whatever he feels is appropriate for the case at
hand.
Whenever a natural break occurs in the diagnostic work-up, the physician
is asked to review and consolidate his findings and hypotheses aloud so as to
provide an ongoing record of his reasoning at intervals. The points at which
this review is most usually obtained are between the history and the physical
examination and at the conclusion of the physical examination before ordering
any laboratory tests. After the full work-up has been completed, the "stimulated
recall" section of the experiment begins. The videotape of the physician's work-
up is replayed for him. He is given a stop-start switch with which he can con-
trol the playback and he is asked to stop it whenever there is an even on which
he can elaborate. He is encouraged to use the tape as .a vehicle to stimulate
his memory and to relate his thoughts during the original encounter. Thus, a
record of his thinking and reasoning supplements the videotaped record of his
overt behavior during the work-up. Generally, scrutiny of the first fifteen to
twenty minutes of an encounter, a procedure ordinarily requiring one to one-
and-a-half hours, provides effective clarification of the basic hypotheses
generated by the physician and his proposed strategies for testing them.
THE UNITS OF ANALYSIS
Once the full record of the interaction between doctor and patient has been
transcribed into a typewritten protocol the process of scoring can begin. This
5
7. -5-
process involves transcriptions both of the original doctor-patient interaction
and of the subsequent review of the videotape by the physician.
As in so many parallel domains, the first problem is that of identifying
the fundamental units of analysis. In this research the units of analysis
will be 1) questions, 2) critical elements or findings, and 3) hypotheses.
It will be seen that the question serves to parse the protocol into the smallest
constituent elements of surface structure, playing much the same role as the mor-
pheme in grammatical analysis. When we discuss what the physician is doing we will
be discussing his questioning behavior. Questions will take many forms, ranging
from the explicit interrogation regarding past medical history to the shining of
a light to examine a patient's eye grounds. Findings may be volunteered by a
patient or elicited via the physician's inquiry. Subsequently, they may be sensed
as critical by the physician or ignored. We will observe that both the elicitation
and sensing of critical problem elements are crucial variables in the analysis of
physician inquiry.
Both questions and findings can be said to lie on the surface of the ob-
servable medical inquiry. Below that surface lie the mental operations which lead
the physician to ask the questions he does and to process them in the way he chooses.
We have found that the hypothesis is a most powerful way of characterizing one im-
portant aspect of these mental operations. in an earlier paper (Elstein, Shulman,
Kagan, and Jason, 1970) we argued that most medical inquiries are characterized by
the relatively early generation of working hypotheses. These in turn appear to
direct the subsequent patterns of data collection and evaluation. In the analysis
6
8. -6-
of the present protocols, it can be seen that a hypothesis can be generated alone
or in the company of competitors. A hypothesis has not only a moment of birth
but also an ultimate fate. It may be entertained and then rejected. It may
never be explicitly rejected, but allowed simply to fade away as better alterna-
tives move into place. It may be confirmed, in which case it moves from the
status of hypothesis to that of tentative or ultimately final diagnosis. The
purpose of asking specific questions to elicit critical findings is to manipulate
the status of these hypotheses in order to achieve a correct diagnosis.
Questions (Q)
A question is defined as any statement or act of the physician which either:
1) seeks information from the patient, 2) instructs the patient concerning a
procedure in the examination, or 3) establishes rapport between the physician and
the patient. To provide a link between these questions and more typical classifi-
cations of physician activity, eight content categories were identified into which
any question could be further assigned. The first six categories are minor modi-
fications of an outline for examining patients which is widely accepted by physicians
and taught to medical students (Harvey, et al., 1960. These categories and
their explanations are described in Table 1. Problems of ambiguous questions,
that is, questions that could justifiably be included in more than one category
because they were simultaneously serving multiple functions or because the func-
tion intended by the physician was not made clear either in the course of the
original work-up of the subsequent stimulated review, will not be discussed in
7
9. -7-
TABLE 1. CATEGORIES OF QUESTIONS
1. Present Illness
Patient's account of onset, duration and course of illness. Chief
complaints and associated symptoms.
2. Personal and Social History
Personal status, habits, home conditions, occupation, environmental
factors, military medical records.
3. Family_History.
State of health and cause of death of parents and siblings. History
of tuberculosis, diabetes, heart trouble, cancer and other disease
with hereditary components.
4. Previous Medical History
History of illnesses, operations, injuries and allergies, review of
functioning of organ systems (neurological, endocrine, respiratory,
ect.).
5. Physical Examination
Search for signs of illness. Examination of skin, heart, lungs,
abdomen, etc.
6. Laboratory Data
Tests performed on various bodily fluids, products or functions.
Examination of blood, urine, sputum, cerebro-spinal fluid. Diag-
nostic x-rays, electrocardiogram, electroencephalogram.
7. Rapport
Statements or questions dealing with the doctor-patient relation-
ship or the patient's anxiety about illness.
8. Instruction,
Statements telling the patient what is about to occur or asking
the patient to do something.
8
10. -8-
the body of the paper. These more technical matters are revieed in full in a
scoring manual currently under development.
Since the analysis of these protocols depends upon the rIeliability with
which they can be objectively parsed into question - components,[ the rules for such
P
divisions were given to two judges who proceeded independently to divide two proto-
cols into their respective questions. A very high percentageA
i of agreement (91%)
was achieved for identifying the actual number and identity nf questions. The agree-
ment for assigning questions to specific content categories Ls only slightly lower
(86%).
Critical Findings (CF)
For each case a list of :ritical findings is compileid. These findings are:
(a) answers to possible questions that might be asked durhig a history, (b) specific
physical findings that would be observed in a physical ex!amination, or (c) results
of laboratory tests that might be ordered. Thus, some flpidings are critical be-
is
cause they are positive while others are equally critical although negative. The
questions asked serve as the milestones of the inquiry,Ondicating how far the in-
dividual has moved in his investigation. The critical ;Findings are potentially
problematic elements with which he must come to terms t;,o solve the problem. If
significant numbers of critical findings are missed, Ois is likely to preclude the
inquirer from reaching his intended destination. On the other hand, no single
finding is indispensable because the interaction of birth psychological and physio-
P
logical systems in the human organism creates redun4ncy among cues. The critical
: I
9
11. -9-
findings list plays much the same role in studies of medical inquiry as the
manual of potentially problematic elements played in studies of teacher inquiry
(Shulman, 1965; Shulman, Loupe and Piper, 1968) or pupil inquiry in local politics
(Allender, 1969).
Each critical finding is important in different ways, depending upon the par-
ticular hypotheses that the physician is entertaining at the moment the finding is
elicited. We judged that it was important to assign a weight or valence to each
critical finding in relation to any of the hypotheses that might be entertained by
the inquirer. Therefore, each critical finding was assigned a weight from -2 to
+2, with regard to its impact upon any hypothesis that might be held in a particu-
lar case. For example, if the physician is simultane,usly entertaining the hypo-
theses of hysterical paralysis and multiple sclerosis, the finding of a positive
plantar reflex (Babinski's sign) has a weight of -2 for the hypothesis of hysteria
and +1 for multiple sclerosis. This is because a positive finding unequivocally
rules out hysteria while, though positive for something like multiple sclerosis,
it does not rule out a number of other disorders which could also produce spinal
cord lesions. We are currently in the process of determining the degree of objec-
tivity with which independent medical judges will assign such weights.
Hypotheses (H)
The hypotheses generated, entertained, explicitly rejected, forgotten,
simply ignored, or ultimately accepted are identified through analysis of the
physician's thinking aloud, both during the inquiry and in the natural breaks
1 0
12. -10-
1
between phases, as well as from his reflections during the stimulated recall
period. Hence, we know that a physician is entertaining a particular hypothesis
because he tells us so. Usually, he volunteers such' information without the neces-
sity for probing. On some occasions, the existence of an underlying hypothesis
1
emerges when the physician is questioned regarding his choice of a particular ques-
tion or test,
To summarize the discussion to this point, it is possible to take the trans-
cribed protocol of a doctor-patient interaction and divide it into basic components
called questions. These questions can be assigned reliably to medically relevant
content categories. The consequences of having asked those questions can further
be reflected: in the elicitation of critical findings. The order in which these
findings emerge is a consequence of the particular questions asked and can clearly
be indicated in a chart. This chart can be said to map the surface structure of
the medical inquiry session that is being analyzed.1
The "deep structure" of a particular inquiry Makes use of the findings
elicited anti the hypotheses generated. The finding's are evaluated in relation to
any particular hypothesis. Second, they are scored to reflect whether or not the
1
physician sensed the importance of the finding if elicited.
Clearly, the major constituent of this deeper level of analysis is the
hypothesis. Charts at this deeper level reflect the relations among findings
elicited and sensed (or not sensed) and the natural history of hypotheses as they
are created and consigned to some particular fate. Questions are used to index the
particular points at which these events occur, serving much the same purpose as
ii.
13. here as page numbers in a book.
By carefully examining the relationships among hypotheses and findings we
can compare the number of positive and negative findings which he elicited for
any considered hypotheses. One measure of the strength of a physician's subjective
probability estimate for a particular hypothesis, for example, may be reflected in
the degree to which findings inconsistent with that hypothesis are elicited or
volunteered, but fail to be sensed.
A SPECIFIC EXAMPLE
Let us now apply these analytic tools to a specific example, a comparison
of two work-ups of the same simulated medical problem. These work-ups are of in-
terest because one (Dr. X), has been uniformly rated by viewers of the videotape
record as one of the poorest in our pilot series of work-ups, while the second
(Dr. Y) has been equally uniformly rated as an excellent example of clinical work.
Can the analytic scheme outlined distinguish between two work-ups that impress
clinicians so differently? And are the identifiable differences (if found) com-
prehended within a more general psychology of problem solving? Can we then begin
to analyze medical diagnosis as a specialized form of problem solving, not simply
as an art sui generis?
Table 1 presented the categories used for classifying questions in the
medical work-up. Table 2 presents the same categories, showing the numbers and
proportions of questions asked by Dr. X and Dr. Y. Dr. Y asks many more questions
than Dr. X, but both ask about the same proportion of questions in Category 1,
12
14. -12-
TABLE 2. QUESTIONS ASKED BY DR. X AND DR. Y
Doctor X (Poor Work-Up) Doctor Y (Good Work-Up)
Number % Total Number % Total
1. Present Illness 62 45 143 43
2. Personal & Social History 20 14 12 4
3. Family History 0 0 14 4
4, Previous Medical History 19 l4 18 5
5. Physical Examination 27 19 99 30
6. Laboratory Data 0 0 0 0
7. Rapport 9 6 22 7
8. Instructions 2 1 24 7
TOTAL 139 99 332 100
13
15. -13-
present illness. They differ in number of questions about personal and social
history (Category 2), previous medical history (Category 4), and physical examina-
tion (Category 5). This surface analysis alone may suggest that Dr. X is searching
for data that will relate to a historical or psychogenic basis for the present
disorder while Dr. Y is testing hypotheses about organic etiology. We suspect, and
shall soon demonstrate, that these surface differences in the data sought reflect
different hypotheses about the nature of the problem. The work-up is not an in-
variant routine. Rather, it is structured to answer certain questions, and dif-
ferent diagnostic hypotheses lead physicians to consult different sources of infor-
mation (Harvey, et al., 1968).
Table 3 presents the list of critical findings for the case in question. The
patient is a 21-year-old female who is brought to the emergency room early one mor-
ning paralyzed in both legs. Having gone to bed the night before believing herself
well, she is quite upset and agitated over the sudden appearance of severe motor
loss. These facts are given to each physician at the start of the problem, as he
walks into the examining room to meet the "patient" for the first time. The initial
facts are consistent with a wide range of diagnoses and hence there is a diagnostic
problem to be solved.
The table also shows the weights that are assigned to the critical findings
for two common diagnostic hypotheses, hysteria and multiple sclerosis. The patient
in question is single, a college student, has a boyfriend with whom she is not con-
templating marriage; she may possibly be pregnant. These facts tend to support a
diagnosis of hysteria and for this reason a "+" has been indicated opposite each
16. -14-
TABLE 3. CRITICAL FINDINGS WITH WEIGHTS FOR TWO HYPOTHESES:
HYSTERIA AND MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS
FINDING HY MS
Given at Start of Problem:
1. 21-year-old female
2. Paralysis of both legs (chief complaint)
3. Brought in by ambulance
4. No fever (99°F oral temperature)
5. Upset and agitated
Personal and Social Data:
6. Single
7. College student
8. Has boyfriend
9. Marriage not contemplated
Medical History and Systems Review:
10. Acute onset of paralysis (overnight)
11. No previous history of paralysis or similar disturbance
12. Visual disturbance (4 weeks ago)
13. Peculiar sensation on right side of body (starting 3 weeks
ago and continuing)
14. Urinary urgency (started 2 days ago)
15. No history of exposure to infection
16. No history of recent injury or trauma
17. Menses 2 weeks overdue
18. Denial of recent stress
19. Knowledge of possible pregnancy
20. No toxic exposure
21. No difficulty with practiced movements of hands
22. No difficulty with speech
23. No significant headaches
Physical Findings:
+
++
24.
25.
Positive Babinski's sign bilaterally.
Blind in one eye
26. No stiffness of neck
27. Weakness of left arm, hand and fingers +
28. Paralysis of left triceps +
29. Temperature lost to T2 (collar bone) bilaterally +
30. Deep pain - Lost to T3 on right (2" above nipple) and Lost
to T4 on left (nipple line)
+
31. Vibration lost to T9 bilaterally (base of rib cage) +
32. Touch lost to TlO (umbilicus) +
33. Sensation OK in saddle area +
17. -15-
FINDING HY MS
34. Complete loss of voluntary motion from waist down:
a. leg extensors
b. leg flexors
c. calf extensors
d. calf flexors
e. adductors
f. gluteal
35. Complete loss of sensation from waist down:
a. touch
b. deep pressure
c. temperature
d. pain
e. Proprioception
f. vibration
36. No limitation in range of motion of joints
37. Palpable bladder
38. Deep tendon reflexes increased
39. Abdominal reflexes decreased
40. Abdominal muscles weak (can't sit up)
Lab Data:
41. CBC
42. Urinalysis
43. Electrophoresis of CSF
44. Skull X-Rays
45. Spinal X-Rays
46. Cervical myelogram
47. Colloidal Gold
1 6
TOTALS
+4.
HY MS
9 14
0 2
1
2 0
25 17
18. -16-
in Table 3 under the column "HY". The findings pointing most strongly toward mul-
tiple sclerosis (incidentally, the correct diagnosis) are: history of visual dis-
turbance four weeks earlier, a peculiar sensation on the right side of the body
starting three weeks ago and continuing, a positive Babinski's sign bilaterally
and the fact that the patient is indeed blind in her right eye on the morning of
the examination although she does not know it. Because these findings, taken as
a whole, point so strongly to multiple sclerosis most have been weighted ++. Note
that a sizable group of findings are + for one hypothesis and for the other (e.g.,
24 and 25), while others are + for one, and equivocal (no entry) for the other.
Some findings do not aid in differentiating between hysteria and multiple sclerosis
(e.g., 34a-f), since they are consistent with either alternative.
Table 3 could be extended to provide a set of weights for every conceivable
diagnostic hypothesis, but in the interests of simplicity only two are presented.
The table permits the investigator to analyze any work-up of this medical problem
in terms of how many findings were elicited and sensed for any possible diagnosis,
the ratio of confirming (+) and disconfirming (-) findings elicited to the numbers
potentially available, and thus to compare work-ups to each other in terms of a
common standard. (Those familiar with the Rorschach test may, find a resemblance
between our method here and Beck's approach of comparing any inkblot response to
a published standard for evaluating F+% [Beck, et al., 1961].)
In Table 4, Dr. X's work-up of the case is summarized. At the far left, the
question numbers serve as an index to the points at which critical findings were
elicited. The columns in the body of the table indicate the diagnostic hypotheses
17
19. UESTION NUMBER
-17-
TABLE 4. DR. X'S WORK-UP: CRITICAL FINDINGS AND HYPOTHESES
HY HI H2 H3 MS
Given Findings 1-5 Gen. Gen.
5 10+ 10+ 10+
10 11-
11 Gen.
21 7+
25 18-
28 Gen.
28 23-
30 (12-) (12++)
33 (27-) (27+) 26- (27+)
33 (40-) (40+) Rej. (40+)
43 6+
45 Rej.
45 15-
55 36-
57 (38-)
69 32- 32+
73 8+
75 9+
89 Gen.
89 16-
96 Rej.
112 17+
116 19+
126 (30-) (30+)
127 34b 34b
130 34d 34d
137 (39-) (39+)
Key:
HY = Hysteria
Hi = Organic Disease
H2 = Viral Infection
H3 = Meningitis
= Trauma
MS = Multiple Sclerosis
( ) = Findings elicited but not sensed
I
20. -18-
which Dr. X, in fact, entertained in the course of the work-up, hysteria being on
the far left. Multiple sclerosis is a diagnosis which he never considered although
it is in fact correct. Hl, H2, H3 and H4 refer to four other hypotheses which he
generated and partially tested. The term "Gen." identifies the approximate point
at which the hypothesis was generated while "Rej." indicates where it was terminated
or rejected. Hypotheses H2, H3 and H4 were rejected after one or two pieces of
negative evidence had been elicited. The hypothesis of organic disease (Hl) was
never formally terminated by Dr. X, but merely allowed to fade away. At the close
of the inquiry, he is testing only one hypothesis, his early favorite, hysteria.
Note that six findings which are negative for hysteria are marked in parentheses
in the appropriate column in Table 4. This indicates that Dr. X elicited these
findings but did not sense their significance for his work-up. This illustrates
the effect of an early commitment to the diagnosis of hysteria upon his inquiry.
He did not process disconfirming evidence. Ironically, the findings not
sensed were strong evidence for multiple sclerosis. The elicitation of these
findings did not lead him to generate this hypothesis and without the hypothesis
as an organizing schema within which to evaluate these findings, they were not
sensed.
Dr. Y's work-up is shown in Table 5. For simplicity and ease of presentation,
a complete analysis is shown only for two hypotheses, hysteria and multiple
sclerosis, although his other hypotheses could be similarly analyzed. Dr. Y's
early hypothesis, generated on the basis of the evidence given to him at the start
of the case, was hysteria. For the first part of the work-up, up to Q
21. -19-
TABLE 5. DR. Y'S WORK-UP: CRITICAL FINDINGS AND HYPOTHESES
QUESTION NUMBER HY HI H2 MS
Given Findings 1-5 4-
Gen.
10 10+
22 18-
27 7+
29 11- 11-
59 6+
67 Gen.
71 Rej. Gen.
71 13
96
98
116
21+
22+
12++
116 Gen.
147 23
212 34a 34a
KEY:
213 34b 34b
215 36- 36+ HY =
HI =
Hysteria
Infection
215
221
34c
35e
34c
35e
H2 =
MS =
Peculiar vascular
condition
Multiple Sclerosis
225 34d 34d H3 = Neurofibroma
231 35f 35f
233 35d 35d
233 30- 30+
234 35a 35a
234 32- 32+
235 29- 29+
261 27- 27+
281 39- 39+
283 40- 40+
284 34e 34e
286 38- 38
290 24-- 24++
322 14+
20
22. -20-
116, findings elicited are largely supportive of that diagnOsis. At that point,
he elicits a finding ( 2, transient: visual disturbance) wIich is strongly positive
for multiple sclerosis. He immediately generates a new hOothesis, multiple
sclerosis. Shortly thereafter, he proceeds into the physical exam where he quite
exhaustively searches for findings which would enable him ;to differentiate multiple
sclerosis and hysteria. In the sequence beginning at Q 2'1,2 and ending at Q 290 he
elicits a range of findings about half of which are equivocal for the two diagnoses,
the other half of which point toward multiple sclerosis and uniformly away from hys-
teria. Dr. Y sensed all the facts he elicited. Everything that he found contributes
to his evaluation of the case. Cues imply hypotheses and subsequently evidence
is marshalled leading to acceptance or rejection.
Table 6 presents a statistical summary of the two work -ups. There are 57
critical findings. Both physicians are given 5 at the start of the
case. Dr. X elicited and sensed another 18, 32% of the alyailable findings. Dr.
Y elicited and sensed 30, 53% of the available findings. i Dr. X elicited but did
not sense 6 critical findings; all were negative for hOteria and 5 were
positive for multiple sclerosis. Dr. Y sensed every finding which he elicited.
To illustrate the impact of commitment to a hypothesis on the elicitation of facts,
look at the percentage of critical findings positive and, negative for the two diag-
noses. Dr. X elicited 78% of the critical findings whic are positive for hysteria
and only 6% of the findings that are positive for multiple sclerosis. Dr. Y was
much more evenhanded in his elicitation of positive findings. He elicited 55% of
the critical findings positive for hysteria and 63% of the findings positive for
21
23. TABLE 6. STATISTICAL SUMMARY OF TWO WORK-UPS
Total Critical Findings
Total Problem Elements Given
Total Problem Elements Elicited
Total Problem Elements Elicited but not Sensed
Total Hypotheses Generated
% Critical Findings (CF) Elicited and Sensed
CF for Hysteria
CF - for Hysteria
% CF + for Multiple Sclerosis
CF - for Multiple Sclerosis
Number of Critical Findings
Hysteria
5+, 10-, 0 not sensed 7+, 3-, 6- not sensed
Multiple Sclerosis
10+, 1-, 0 not sensed 1+, 1-, 5+ not sensed
Dr. Y Dr. X
57 57
5 5
30
18
0 6
30/57 = 53 18/57 = 32
5/9 = 55 7/9 = 78
10/14 = 71 3/1h = 2)
10/16 = 63 1/16 = 6
1/1 - 100 1/1 = 100
24. -22-
multiple sclerosis. Thus, we see that Dr. Y searched about equally for positive
findings for two diagnoses. A commitment to one diagnosis did not cause him to
overlook evidence that favored another. Having a clear contrasting alternative to
hysteria in mind helped Dr. Y greatly in testing and weighing evidence. As Table
4 shows, Dr. X never did generate a strong alternative to hysteria and discarded
most alternatives after minimal disconfirmation.
Even more striking are differences in their handling of negative evidence.
Dr. X elicited and processed only 21% of the negative evidence for hysteria while
Dr: Y found 71% of this evidence. It is verhaps tempting to conclude that it is
the ability to utilize disconfirming evidence which distinguishes good from poor
clinical work in this illustration. But the facts do not necessarily imply that
Dr. Y is a more efficient processor of negative information. The structure of this
medical problem itself dictates that a sizable body of findings are + for multiple
sclerosis and for hysteria. Thus, having generated both hypotheses, Dr. Y can
search for positive findings for either. His strength as a problem solver may He
not in a relatively rare gift to draw inferences from negative information, but
rather in his capacity to generate alternative hypotheses so that all the facts he
finds are + for some concept. Then, they can be sensed, retained in memory, and
utilized in solving the problem. Dr. X, in contrast, never generated the alter-
natives he needed for which his unsensed findings would have been + data. His
repeated failure to do so, when presented with many of the same cues which Dr. Y
observed, implies premature commitment to a single alternative.
Analysis of these cases thus suggests that, in this example, a good medical
9 .1
25. -23-
work-up can be differentiated From a poor one in three ways:
1. The better work-up shows greater flexibility in generating al-
ternative hypotheses based on minimal information. It is
crucial for Dr. Y's success that he generate the hypothesis of
multiple sclerosis the instant he encounters a strongly positive
( +f) finding for that disease. Having generated it, it implies
for him a plan of search and a schema for organizing findings.
2. Therefore, the better work-up is characterized by greater sen-
sitivity to critical findings. This feature, is in our opinion,
contingent upon having a hypothesis available as an organizing
framework for the data. Thus, early sensitivity to cues facil-
itates hypothesis generation which in turn facilitates sensi-
tivity to findings emerging later.
3. Finally, the better work-up appears to exemplify a more compre-
hensive, efficient use of negative proof. But this too, is a
consequence of having available for testing competing hypotheses
so structured that data positive for one are negative for the
other.
Thus, efficiency in diagnosis seems to be a function of not simply generating
early hypotheses, but more specifically, of generating hypotheses which are strong
conceptual competitors. Dr. X, in fact, generated and tested more hypotheses than
Dr. Y, but none of his alternatives to hysteria were framed so as to be strong com-
petitors. Perhaps his inability to generate strong alternatives was a function of
Oti
26. defec.ts in his l..nowIts:aq,, perh,lps a
-24-
Alt of premature closure on the psychogenic
hypothesis. Dr. Y seems to em;:loy a method of multiple working hypotheses
(Chamberlin, 1965). question for further study is, what coedit ions of the prob-
lem setting or attriburc-... of the problem solver increase the likelihood of using
thi., method?
Finally, it should be stressed that we are not claiming that all, or ever
most good medical inquiry is structurally similar to Dr. Y's approach. We are
simply demonstrating here a method for the comparative study of different work-ups,
so that common features of good work can be empirically determined. We are, how-
ever, encouraged with this analysis because it can be readily related to principles
and findings in the psychology of non-medical problem solving,. and it is to these
conceptual links that we now turn.
DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS
We will briefly discuss the theoretical implications which derive from
the pilot study reported. Another paper (Elstein, Shulman, Kagan and Jason, 1970)
more fully develops the theoretical model which directs this research.
This paper has reported on an analysis of medical inquiry which combined a
variety of investigative methods. The methods used included direct observation of
physician performance while dealing with a simulated patient; thinking aloud tech-
niques:. segmented retrospection, in which the physician was encouraged to reflect
on what he had just done during natural "breaks" in the medical interviewing process;
and stimulated recall retrospection, in which the interview was reviewed as a whole
27. -25-
by physician and in,iestic:ators with the aid of an immediate videotape playback.
The findings generated w,ing these methods can now be reviewed in the light
of the four criteria enunciated at the beginning of this paper. There is an
acceptable level of inter-rater reliility at those points where reliability has
already been calculated. There are several other aspects of the scoring system
whose reliability has nut yet been systematically investigated but we have no
reason to anticipate that there will be a great deal of difficulty in those areas.
Examination of the scoring from the vantage point of clinical medicine reveals
that the relevant aspects of the medical interview have been captured in the
scoring procedures. We can examine the duration and character of the interaction
between physician and patient. We can analyze the distributional breakdown of
particular questions by medical content categories. These categories reflect the
amount of effort that the physician is expending for both information-gathering
and the establishment of interpersonal rapport. Analysis of the deeper structure
of the interview begins to explain how the physician is using these questions in
order to move toward a diagnosis. The points in the interview where diagnostic
hypotheses are generated and the apparent reasons why some continue to develop
while others are rejected can be studied and understood.
The language of the "deep structure" level of analysis is drawn to a great
eYtent from the lexicon of cognitive psychology. The very structure of the analysis
makes it readily amenable to comparison and contrast with existing positions on
the psychology of thinking and problem solving. Since our purpose is not only to
develop a deeper understanding of one particular domain of inquiry, namely medical
26
28. -26-
diagnosis, but also to use this understanding to augment general cognitive theory,
the compatibility of these tvio language systems is an important and desirable char-
acteristic.
We have also demonstrated that when applying this scoring system to two con-
trasting protocols, one of which can be judged globally as an example of success-
ful inquiry and the other unsuccessful, our system meets the psychometric criterion
of discrimination. That is, the scores effectively distinguish between levels of
performance as rated independently.
Related Theories
Clearly, the division o medical inquiry into levels of surface and deep struc-
ture derives from the seminal work of Chomsky (1965) in linguistics. At this stage,
we are merely using his constructs as a convenient descriptive language for em-
phasizing the contrast between observable performance and underlying operations.
Whether the theory of medical inquiry which ultimately evolves from this research
takes on the character of a "grammar", i.e., a set of generative rules of inquiry
competence, remains questionable.
Analysis of the two inquiry protocols suggests that the two physicians dif-
fered markedly in their ability to process and to make use of the information they
elicited, especially that information which we might call "negative irfslances'!_.
We know that, in general, negative instances are extremely difficult to process
(Hovland and Weiss, 1953; Bruner, et al., 1956; Donaldson, 1959). We know fur-
ther that it is characteristic of many problem solvers to ignore negative instances
2
29. -27-
if they can find sufficient positive instances to bolster a hypothesis which they
are holding (Wason, I968). This is clearly one way of accounting for the differences
between the performances of Dr. X and Dr. Y. There is another way of accounting
for those differences. What constituted a negative instance for Dr. X, because he
had not already formulated a hypothesis within which to accomodate the finding,
constituted a positive instance for Dr. Y, since the set of multiple working hypo-
theses with which he was operating included one for which any particular obser-
vation could constitute positive evidence. This argument is more fully developed
in the previous section.
The descriptions of chess thinking by De Groot (1965) are also very sugges-
tive. Examination of our protocols lends credence to De Groot's concept of progres-
sive deepening. De Groot argued that chess masters develop several alternative
lines of possible attack and explore them mentally in an alternating fashion, moving
back and forth at continually deeper levels. We believe that one of the major
virtues of progressive deepening is that it guarantees the operation of multiple
working hypotheses. It may very well be that the coexistence of several working
lines of inquiry is a necessary feature of any approach to problem solving which
must combat the dangers of premature closure leading to inadequate handling of
negative instances, Einstellung, and other psychological states which inhibit the
effectiveness of the problem solver.
In their classical studies of concept attainment, Bruner, et al. (1956)
argued that focusing strategies were much more efficient than scanning strategies.
Scanning strategies, you will recall, are strategies in which the problem solver
28
30. -28-
begins with hypotheses, either single or multiple, and processes the information
in the light of these hypotheses. Focusing strategies are more purely inductive
in nature, and differ from each other only in their degree of conservatism in infor-
mation processing. The reason, Bruner argued, for the relative inefficiency of
scanning strategies, is that they lay far too great a burden of cognitive strain
on the information processor. We have taken note of Bruner's observation and
the marked contrast between his assertion and our reality. We have found that
early generation of hypotheses in a scanning mode, rather than indcutive focusing
strategies are the characteristic hallmarks of the experienced diagnostician. This
observation has been further supported in recent articles by an Australian investi-
gator (Dudley, 1970; 1971).
We believe that it is readily understandable why Bruner's observations and
ours do not agree. Bruner and other psychologists have constructed experimental
settings in which, for purposes of maintaining the control needed, they divorce
the content of the experimental task from all previous experiences and systematic
bodies of knowledge which the inquirer may bring into the research setting. For
obvious reasons, it was neither possible nor desirable to do that in our studies
of medical diagnosis. In fact, the world at large is a place where problem sol-
ving is rooted in and dependent upon systematic bodies of knowledge stored in
various structured ways in the memories of problem solvers. What we need is a set
of theoretical formulations which will account for how cognitive functioning occurs
in the presence of such structured bodies of knowledge, not in the absence of
them. We hope that the present series of studies will serve to make some small
contribution to that yet infant body of investigation and theory.
31. REFERENCES
Allender, J.S. The teaching of inquiry skills using a learning center.
AV Communication Review, 1969, 17, 399-409.
Beck, S.J., Beck, A.G., Levitt, E.E. and Molish, H.B. Rorschach's test.
Vol. 1: Basic Processes. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1961.
Bruner, J.S., Goodnow, J.J., and Austin, G.A. A study of thinking. New
York: Wiley, 1956.
Chamberlin, T.C. The method of multiple working hypotheses. Science, 1965,
148, 754-759.
Chomsky, N. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press,
1965
De Groot, A.D. Thought and choice in chefs. The Hague: Mouton, 1965.
Donaldson, M. Positive and negative information in matching problems. British
Journal of Psychology, 1959, 50, 235-262.
Dudley, H.A.F. The clinical task. Lancet, 1970, 1352-1354.
. Clinical method. Lancet, 1971, 35-37.
Elstein, A., Shulman, L., Kagan, H. and Jason, H. A theory of medical inquiry.
Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference on Research in Medical Edu-
cation. Washington: Association of American Medical Colleges, 1970.
Harvey, A.M., Cuff, L.E., Johns, R.J., Owens, A.H., Rabinowitz, D. and Ross,
R.S. Principles and practice of medicine. 17th Ed. New York: Apple-
ton-Century-Crofts, 1968.
Hovland, C.I. and Weiss, W. Transmission of information concerning concepts
through positive and negative instances. Journal of Experimental
Psychology, 1953, 45, 175-182.
Kagan, N., Elstein, A., Jason, H., and Shulman, L. Methods for the study of
medical inquiry. Proceedin_gs of the Ninth Annual Conference on Research
in Medical Education. Washington: Association of American Medical
Colleges, 1970.
Schwab, J.J. The practical: A language for curriculum. School Review, 1969
78, 1-23.
Shulman, L.S., Seeking styles and individual differences in patterns of inquiry.
School Review, 1965, 73, 258-266.
, Loupe, M., and Piper, R. Studies of the inquiry process. Department
of Health Education and Welfare, Office of Education, Project No. 5-0597,
Michigan State University, July, 1968.
20
32. ,
Simon, H.A., Human problem solving: Current state of the theory. Address
to the American Psychological Association, Miami Beach, 1970.
Wason, P.C. 'On the failure to eliminate hypotheses a
second look. In P.C. Wason and P.N. Johnson-Laird (Eds.), Thinking
and reasoning, Baltimore: Penguin Books, 1968.
31