The document discusses how to achieve a happy marriage between context-driven and agile approaches to software development and testing. It advocates for involving testers from the start of projects and having them work closely with developers as part of integrated teams. The document also provides advice on skills needed for testers, such as domain knowledge and a willingness to learn, and emphasizes pairing with other roles like developers to facilitate collaboration and knowledge sharing.
In 2011, the website edge.org asked the question, 'What scientific concept would improve everybody's cognitive toolkit?'. There were answers from renowned intellectuals. I have listed some of the concepts which are relevant to software development.
What is Shift Left Testing? Do you need to use that term to improve your Software Testing and Development process? I don't think so.
- why I don't use the term Shift Left
- Explanation of what Shift Left means when people use it
- Explanation of what Shift Left might mean when people hear it
- How to Shift Left incorrectly
- How to improve your test process without using the phrase Shift Left.
Hire me for consultancy and buy my online books and training at:
- https://compendiumdev.co.uk
- http://eviltester.com
- http://seleniumsimplified.com
- http://javafortesters.com
In 2011, the website edge.org asked the question, 'What scientific concept would improve everybody's cognitive toolkit?'. There were answers from renowned intellectuals. I have listed some of the concepts which are relevant to software development.
What is Shift Left Testing? Do you need to use that term to improve your Software Testing and Development process? I don't think so.
- why I don't use the term Shift Left
- Explanation of what Shift Left means when people use it
- Explanation of what Shift Left might mean when people hear it
- How to Shift Left incorrectly
- How to improve your test process without using the phrase Shift Left.
Hire me for consultancy and buy my online books and training at:
- https://compendiumdev.co.uk
- http://eviltester.com
- http://seleniumsimplified.com
- http://javafortesters.com
The Snail Entrepreneur: The 7-year-old kid every startup should learn fromClaudio Perrone
Matteo faced a seemly impossible problem, but didn't give up. He used daddy's #PopcornFlow and pivoted. 17 options and 5 experiments later, he converged to success.
PopcornFlow is impacting businesses (large and small) but also families and kids.
If you like this story, please contribute to Matteo's cause.
Prezentacja z ósmego spotkania z cyklu Quality Meetup.
Autor: Michał Stryjak (QA Manager, PiLab SA)
Przez wiele lat ludzie starali się wskazać niezawodne podejście do testowania. Nasz Gość uczestniczył w wielu dyskusjach dotyczących wyższości jednej metody nad drugą, które zwykle sprowadzały się do poszukiwania odpowiedzi na pytanie, czy jakaś konkretna praktyka zmieni świat testów na zawsze.
Już wiele lat temu Cem Kaner zauważył, że najlepsze praktyki głoszone przez jego kolegów wykładowców nie zawsze sprawdzają się dobrze w rzeczywistości. Często obserwował jak procesy i narzędzia stosowane z powodzeniem, np. w startupach, nie sprawdzają się w bankach lub branży medycznej (i vice versa). Z biegiem lat Cem doszedł do wniosku, że coraz więcej osób ma podobne spostrzeżenia dotyczące najlepszych praktyk. Ludzie podzielający jego poglądy (najbardziej znani to James Bach i Bret Pettichord) twierdzą, że aby móc testować dobrze, najpierw trzeba uwzględnić i przeanalizować kontekst. Ich idee znalazły odwzorowanie w siedmiu zasadach, które dzisiaj stanowią podstawę podejścia Context-Driven Testing (CDT). Na spotkaniu Michał opowie nam o podstawach CDT oraz podzieli się pomysłami, jak można wdrażać wspomniane siedem zasad w życie.
Ho Chi Minh City Software Testing Conference January 2015
Software Testing in the Agile World
Website: www.hcmc-stc.org
Author: Lee Copeland
Over the years writers have defined testing as a process of finding, a process of evaluating, a process of measuring, a process of improving. For a quarter of a century we as testers have been focused on the internal process of testing, while generally disregarding its real purpose. The real purpose of testing is to create information. James Bach nailed it when he wrote, “The ultimate reason testers exist is to provide information that others on the project use to create things of value.” That is why testing exists — to provide information of value. So, when managers complain that testing “costs too much” perhaps they are really trying to say, “I’m not getting enough valuable information to justify the cost of testing.” When testers say “my management doesn’t see the value in our work” perhaps they are really trying to say, “My management doesn’t value the information I’m providing to them.” To prove our worth, to increase the value of testing, we must first focus on testing’s purpose — providing valuable information — not its process. Join Lee as he discusses why quantifying the value of testing is difficult work — perhaps that’s why we concentrate so much on testing process—that’s much easier. But until we do this difficult work, until we prove our worth through quantifying our contribution, we should expect the bombardments to continue.
These are the results from our 2015 State of Selenium survey. Please feel free to use the information to produce your own original content. We only ask that you provide links to Tellurium (www.te52.com) and the Test Test Blog (www.testtalkblog.com).
Automation vs. intelligence - "follow me if you want to live"Viktor Slavchev
Have you ever heard the story that your job is automatable, that all the human testers will be replaced by machines or automated tests and you will lose your job? Or even worse, that machines and artificial intelligence will take over our craft and our life and we will be totally useless. Do you buy these? Are you afraid?
“Come with me, if you want to live” – this was the famous line that many members of the Human resistance in the Terminator franchise used, when offering their help in the war against Skynet.
So, come with me (and John Connor), and join the testing resistance to fight on the side of intellect against the evil machine army. I am willing to challenge the I part in AI on contest by focusing on few key topics:
Can we translate testing into machine language? Polymorphic and mimeomorphic actions – what are these?
Do we really know what are the benefits of human testing? What are human testers irreplaceable for?
Do we really have empirical evidence that computers are capable of doing professional testing? Do we have evidence of “intelligence” at all?
Last year at RTC ‘17 I was asked – “Is AI the answer to all test automation problems?”. My answer is “No, it’s not!”. And this talk is my explanation why.
Changing business of testing - Testing Assembly Helsinki 2014Vasco Duarte
Testing jobs will move to cheaper countries unless the role of testing changes. This is a trend that is happening already, we see large teams of testers being moved to other countries, simply because it is cheaper to do bad testing there!
Testing is a critical part of the product and software development process, and if we don't change its role it will slowly become obsolete. The fact is, that the traditional view of testing endangers testing jobs: now here, and later also in cheaper countries.
I propose a different view of testing. I propose that testing is about enabling business results, not just technical quality. I propose that the tester's job goes far beyond finding issues to track, but also finding users to acquire, finding methods to succeed in the software business. Testing in my view is about making businesses succeed, not about avoid failures in software.
In this presentation I'll describe how a very simple change can profoundly transform the role of testing in a way that it directly enables and supports our businesses! Testing is about making our businesses succeed!
The road ahead is not easy, and not every tester is ready to embrace this view of testing. But the road ahead is inevitable. And we have to start on that journey now!
When confronted with a problem, have you ever stopped and asked "why" five times? The Five Whys technique is a simple but powerful way to troubleshoot problems by exploring cause-and-effect relationships.
This is a summary of the blogs by Eric Ries on the Five Whys at http://startuplessonslearned.blogspot.com/2008/11/five-whys.html. It was used for an internal presentation at Cogent Consulting. If Eric or anyone else thinks this should not be public I will take it down, but I hope I'll drive (a little) more traffic to his blog :-)
Ho Chi Minh City Software Testing Conference January 2015
Software Testing in the Agile World
Website: www.hcmc-stc.org
Author: Lee Copeland
The IEEE 829 Test Documentation standard is thirty years old this year. Boris Beizer’s first book on software testing also turned thirty. Testing Computer Software, the best selling book on software testing, is twenty-five. During the last three decades, hardware platforms have evolved from mainframes to minis to desktops to laptops to tablets to smartphones. Development paradigms have shifted from waterfall to agile. Consumers expect more functionality, demand higher quality, and are less loyal to brands. The world has changed dramatically and testing must change to match it. Testing processes that helped us succeed in the past may prevent our success in the future. Lee Copeland shares his insights into the future of testing, sharing his Do’s and Don’ts in the areas of technology, organization, test processes, test plans, and automation. Join Lee for a thought provoking look at creating a better testing future.
Break to build - the mindset of the modern day testerViktor Slavchev
I spent last couple of years performing, talking, writing and listening about software testing.
But what is software testing? I am told my job is to “break software”. But why break it, it looks good?! I like the programmers, they are my friends. And, as Michael Bolton says, “We don’t break software, it was already broken when we got it”.
I sure don’t break software for living, but I do something way better and much more satisfying - I break clichés about software testing.
So, my job as your guide in your journey in testing will be to break some clichés from the past in order to build the mindset of the modern tester.
Exploratory testing has many flavours. Our flavour is based on building confidence for the stakeholders. Using experience but also using coverage based test design techniques.
The Snail Entrepreneur: The 7-year-old kid every startup should learn fromClaudio Perrone
Matteo faced a seemly impossible problem, but didn't give up. He used daddy's #PopcornFlow and pivoted. 17 options and 5 experiments later, he converged to success.
PopcornFlow is impacting businesses (large and small) but also families and kids.
If you like this story, please contribute to Matteo's cause.
Prezentacja z ósmego spotkania z cyklu Quality Meetup.
Autor: Michał Stryjak (QA Manager, PiLab SA)
Przez wiele lat ludzie starali się wskazać niezawodne podejście do testowania. Nasz Gość uczestniczył w wielu dyskusjach dotyczących wyższości jednej metody nad drugą, które zwykle sprowadzały się do poszukiwania odpowiedzi na pytanie, czy jakaś konkretna praktyka zmieni świat testów na zawsze.
Już wiele lat temu Cem Kaner zauważył, że najlepsze praktyki głoszone przez jego kolegów wykładowców nie zawsze sprawdzają się dobrze w rzeczywistości. Często obserwował jak procesy i narzędzia stosowane z powodzeniem, np. w startupach, nie sprawdzają się w bankach lub branży medycznej (i vice versa). Z biegiem lat Cem doszedł do wniosku, że coraz więcej osób ma podobne spostrzeżenia dotyczące najlepszych praktyk. Ludzie podzielający jego poglądy (najbardziej znani to James Bach i Bret Pettichord) twierdzą, że aby móc testować dobrze, najpierw trzeba uwzględnić i przeanalizować kontekst. Ich idee znalazły odwzorowanie w siedmiu zasadach, które dzisiaj stanowią podstawę podejścia Context-Driven Testing (CDT). Na spotkaniu Michał opowie nam o podstawach CDT oraz podzieli się pomysłami, jak można wdrażać wspomniane siedem zasad w życie.
Ho Chi Minh City Software Testing Conference January 2015
Software Testing in the Agile World
Website: www.hcmc-stc.org
Author: Lee Copeland
Over the years writers have defined testing as a process of finding, a process of evaluating, a process of measuring, a process of improving. For a quarter of a century we as testers have been focused on the internal process of testing, while generally disregarding its real purpose. The real purpose of testing is to create information. James Bach nailed it when he wrote, “The ultimate reason testers exist is to provide information that others on the project use to create things of value.” That is why testing exists — to provide information of value. So, when managers complain that testing “costs too much” perhaps they are really trying to say, “I’m not getting enough valuable information to justify the cost of testing.” When testers say “my management doesn’t see the value in our work” perhaps they are really trying to say, “My management doesn’t value the information I’m providing to them.” To prove our worth, to increase the value of testing, we must first focus on testing’s purpose — providing valuable information — not its process. Join Lee as he discusses why quantifying the value of testing is difficult work — perhaps that’s why we concentrate so much on testing process—that’s much easier. But until we do this difficult work, until we prove our worth through quantifying our contribution, we should expect the bombardments to continue.
These are the results from our 2015 State of Selenium survey. Please feel free to use the information to produce your own original content. We only ask that you provide links to Tellurium (www.te52.com) and the Test Test Blog (www.testtalkblog.com).
Automation vs. intelligence - "follow me if you want to live"Viktor Slavchev
Have you ever heard the story that your job is automatable, that all the human testers will be replaced by machines or automated tests and you will lose your job? Or even worse, that machines and artificial intelligence will take over our craft and our life and we will be totally useless. Do you buy these? Are you afraid?
“Come with me, if you want to live” – this was the famous line that many members of the Human resistance in the Terminator franchise used, when offering their help in the war against Skynet.
So, come with me (and John Connor), and join the testing resistance to fight on the side of intellect against the evil machine army. I am willing to challenge the I part in AI on contest by focusing on few key topics:
Can we translate testing into machine language? Polymorphic and mimeomorphic actions – what are these?
Do we really know what are the benefits of human testing? What are human testers irreplaceable for?
Do we really have empirical evidence that computers are capable of doing professional testing? Do we have evidence of “intelligence” at all?
Last year at RTC ‘17 I was asked – “Is AI the answer to all test automation problems?”. My answer is “No, it’s not!”. And this talk is my explanation why.
Changing business of testing - Testing Assembly Helsinki 2014Vasco Duarte
Testing jobs will move to cheaper countries unless the role of testing changes. This is a trend that is happening already, we see large teams of testers being moved to other countries, simply because it is cheaper to do bad testing there!
Testing is a critical part of the product and software development process, and if we don't change its role it will slowly become obsolete. The fact is, that the traditional view of testing endangers testing jobs: now here, and later also in cheaper countries.
I propose a different view of testing. I propose that testing is about enabling business results, not just technical quality. I propose that the tester's job goes far beyond finding issues to track, but also finding users to acquire, finding methods to succeed in the software business. Testing in my view is about making businesses succeed, not about avoid failures in software.
In this presentation I'll describe how a very simple change can profoundly transform the role of testing in a way that it directly enables and supports our businesses! Testing is about making our businesses succeed!
The road ahead is not easy, and not every tester is ready to embrace this view of testing. But the road ahead is inevitable. And we have to start on that journey now!
When confronted with a problem, have you ever stopped and asked "why" five times? The Five Whys technique is a simple but powerful way to troubleshoot problems by exploring cause-and-effect relationships.
This is a summary of the blogs by Eric Ries on the Five Whys at http://startuplessonslearned.blogspot.com/2008/11/five-whys.html. It was used for an internal presentation at Cogent Consulting. If Eric or anyone else thinks this should not be public I will take it down, but I hope I'll drive (a little) more traffic to his blog :-)
Ho Chi Minh City Software Testing Conference January 2015
Software Testing in the Agile World
Website: www.hcmc-stc.org
Author: Lee Copeland
The IEEE 829 Test Documentation standard is thirty years old this year. Boris Beizer’s first book on software testing also turned thirty. Testing Computer Software, the best selling book on software testing, is twenty-five. During the last three decades, hardware platforms have evolved from mainframes to minis to desktops to laptops to tablets to smartphones. Development paradigms have shifted from waterfall to agile. Consumers expect more functionality, demand higher quality, and are less loyal to brands. The world has changed dramatically and testing must change to match it. Testing processes that helped us succeed in the past may prevent our success in the future. Lee Copeland shares his insights into the future of testing, sharing his Do’s and Don’ts in the areas of technology, organization, test processes, test plans, and automation. Join Lee for a thought provoking look at creating a better testing future.
Break to build - the mindset of the modern day testerViktor Slavchev
I spent last couple of years performing, talking, writing and listening about software testing.
But what is software testing? I am told my job is to “break software”. But why break it, it looks good?! I like the programmers, they are my friends. And, as Michael Bolton says, “We don’t break software, it was already broken when we got it”.
I sure don’t break software for living, but I do something way better and much more satisfying - I break clichés about software testing.
So, my job as your guide in your journey in testing will be to break some clichés from the past in order to build the mindset of the modern tester.
Exploratory testing has many flavours. Our flavour is based on building confidence for the stakeholders. Using experience but also using coverage based test design techniques.
Fear the psychology of testing rik marselisRik Marselis
Presentation about the psychology of testing. Based (amongst others) on Thomas Crum's theory F.E.A.R. - Fantasy Experienced As Reality. And also Agile testing, 7 habits of highly effective testers and more.
Exploratory testing is a big part of 'agile' but what exactly does it mean?
How does it differ to other approaches? How do we get value from it? How does the team benefit from it?
How can the whole team participate? What are some misconceptions?
Time, effectiveness and the value of Exploratory Testing can be lost if the team doesn't have a decent understanding of what it is. It is one of the most powerful learning tools your team has and the team can be losing out on the value of this.
During this interactive session lets learn about the tool so we can make the best use of it. And get that time, effectiveness and value back.
Tips for Writing Better Charters for Exploratory Testing Sessions by Michael...TEST Huddle
We will look at some common pitfalls encountered when chartering your testing for session-based exploratory testing. After a brief overview of the session-based test management process we will jump into specific practices and techniques to help you and the rest of your team achieve better coverage and find better bugs. A presentation for the EuroSTAR Software Testing Community from September 2012.
A Rapid Introduction to Rapid Software TestingTechWell
You're under tight time pressure and have barely enough information to proceed with testing. How do you test quickly and inexpensively, yet still produce informative, credible, and accountable results? Rapid Software Testing, adopted by context-driven testers worldwide, offers a field-proven answer to this all-too-common dilemma. In this one-day sampler of the approach, Michael Bolton introduces you to the skills and practice of Rapid Software Testing through stories, discussions, and "minds-on" exercises that simulate important aspects of real testing problems. The rapid approach isn't just testing with speed or a sense of urgency; it's mission-focused testing that eliminates unnecessary work, assures that the most important things get done, and constantly asks how testers can help speed up the successful completion of the project. Join Michael to learn how Rapid Testing focuses on both the mind set and skill set of the individual tester, using tight loops of exploration and critical thinking skills to help continuously re-optimize testing to match clients' needs and expectations.
Rapid Prototyping and Usability Testing - HUXPADerrick Bowen
Why don't people adopt the changes we design to benefit them? It is a function of 1) Team bias towards believing they know what end users will want, and; 2) An environment that requires teams to “protect” themselves by showing constant short-term progress. Collecting and utilizing early unbiased feedback will help you balance the effort vs. value equation for your users / customers, leading to quicker uptake.
Graham Thomas - Software Testing Secrets We Dare Not Tell - EuroSTAR 2013TEST Huddle
EuroSTAR Software Testing Conference 2013 presentation on Software Testing Secrets We Dare Not Tell by Graham Thomas.
See more at: http://conference.eurostarsoftwaretesting.com/past-presentations/
Perhaps in no other professional field is the dichotomy between theory and practice more starkly different than in the realm of software testing. Researchers and thought leaders claim that testing requires a high level of cognitive and interpersonal skills, in order to make judgments about the ability of software to fulfill its operational goals. In their minds, testing is about assessing and communicating the risks involved in deploying software in a specific state.
However, in many organizations, testing remains a necessary evil, and a cost to drive down as much as possible. Testing is merely a measure of conformance to requirements, without regard to the quality of requirements or how conformance is measured. This is certainly an important measure, but tells an incomplete story about the value of software in support of our business goals.
We as testers often help to perpetuate the status quo. Although in many cases we realize we can add far more value than we do, we continue to perform testing in a manner that reduces our value in the software development process.
This presentation looks at the state of the art as well of the state of common practice, and attempts to provide a rationale and roadmap whereby the practice of testing can be made more exciting and stimulating to the testing professional, as well as more valuable to the product and the organization.
The Leaders Guide to Getting Started with Automated TestingJames Briers
Conventional testing is yesterday’s news, is required but needs the same overhaul that has happened in development. It needs to be a slicker operation that really identifies the risk associated with release and protects the business from serious system failure. The only way to achieve this is to remove the humans, they are prone to error, take a long time, cost a lot of money and don’t always do what they are told.
Automation needs to be adopted as a total process, not a bit part player. Historically automation has focussed on the User Interface, which can be a start, but is often woefully lacking. Implementing an Automation Eco-System, sees automation drive through to the interface or service layer, enabling far higher reuse of automated scripts, encompasses the environment and the test data within it’s strategy, providing a robust, repeatable and reusable asset.
Don’t just automate the obvious. Automation is not a black box testing technique. Rather it is mirroring the development and building an exercise schedule for the code. Take your testing to the next level and realise the real benefits of a modern Automation Eco-system.
Presented at Ford's 2017 Global IT Learning Summit (GLITS)Ron Lazaro
Presentation Details: The best way to think about product discovery is to think about it in relation to product delivery. It's not possible to build a product without doing both discovery and delivery. Discovery encompasses all the activities that we do to decide what to build. It includes all the decisions we make to decide what to build next, whereas delivery is all the activities we do to write code, package releases, ship products. It's how we deliver value to our customers.
Key takeaway for the participants will be to help them understand the difference between Product Discovery and Product Delivery and how to apply techniques in doing both.
Basically this slid will help to Learn software quality testing on scratch level.
Software testing is the quality measures conducted to provide stakeholders with information about the quality of the product or service. Test techniques include, but are not limited to, the process of executing a program or application with the intent of finding software bugs. It is an important part of the entire Software Development ensuring that the functionalities of the system are tested to the finest and assures the quality, correctness and completeness of the product. Software testing, depending on the testing method employed, can be implemented at any time in the development process.
Stages of testing:
o Test planning
o Test Analysis
o Test verification & Construction
o Test execution
o Defect tracking and management
o Quality Analysis Bug tracking
o Report
o Final testing & implementation
A Rapid Introduction to Rapid Software TestingTechWell
You're under tight time pressure and have barely enough information to proceed with testing. How do you test quickly and inexpensively, yet still produce informative, credible, and accountable results? Rapid Software Testing, adopted by context-driven testers worldwide, offers a field-proven answer to this all-too-common dilemma. In this one-day sampler of the approach, Paul Holland introduces you to the skills and practice of Rapid Software Testing through stories, discussions, and "minds-on" exercises that simulate important aspects of real testing problems. The rapid approach isn't just testing with speed or a sense of urgency; it's mission-focused testing that eliminates unnecessary work, assures that the most important things get done, and constantly asks how testers can help speed up the successful completion of the project. Join Paul to learn how rapid testing focuses on both the mind set and skill set of the individual tester who uses tight loops of exploration and critical thinking skills to help continuously re-optimize testing to match clients' needs and expectations.
TOPS Technologies offer Professional Software Testing Training in Ahmedabad.
Ahmedabad Office (C G Road)
903 Samedh Complex,
Next to Associated Petrol Pump,
CG Road,
Ahmedabad 380009.
http://www.tops-int.com/live-project-training-software-testing.html
Most experienced IT Training Institute in Ahmedabad known for providing software testing course as per Industry Standards and Requirement.
Uniting product development, business strategy, and agile software practices.
Covers thinking about product development wholistically from a customer-first perspective. Suggests good principles for established companies and boostrappers.
This was a 4-hour workshop that was given at World Usability Day Colombia. #wudco14
Summary:
Now more than ever is the survival of the easiest. Whether the product is a website or a handheld device, success depends largely on how easy it is to use. Usability testing is one of the most effective for creating an intuitive methods. By observing actual people when they use the product, you can get valuable insights if your design is easy to use. Attendees will learn how to conduct a usability test with end users of a product. This workshop is highly interactive and includes several practical exercises to give participants practical experience.
You will learn:
- How to plan a usability testing study
- How to define the goals and objectives
- Explore options (unmoderated usability testing vs. unmoderated & remote vs. in-person)
- How to recruit the right participants
- How to create tasks (Interview-based vs. predefined tasks)
- How to moderate a usability test
- How to analyze and report the results
Taking observation insights and transform them into a conveyable form through visualization (sketchnoting)
In the first part of the tutorial, we will give a thorough introduction into sketch noting and the psychology of observation.
In the second half, we’ll apply it to a real testing project. A product owner (impersonated by either Huib or Ilari) talks about the product requirements, while the participants take notes in the form of sketch notes. Then based on that, they will design their tests (preferably in the form of sketch notes, too) and then test the product in real time.
-> participants should show up with a laptop
Learnings:
When you do test design or reporting, don’t only rely on words. Sketch noting will enhance your capabilities and support your thinking process in unusual ways.
Imagine your team is not happily sitting together in the same room or building but scattered across different countries. How do you keep communications up and running? How do you handle such a situation as a manager? How do you cope with potentially not everyone getting crucial information?
Participants will get a (very short) overview of Ilari’s experiences and then be put in a simulation, wherein they have to collaborate on a mini-project and come to a successful end. Of course, there will be disturbances, which will make the endeavor more difficult.
Software Delivery At the Speed of AI: Inflectra Invests In AI-Powered QualityInflectra
In this insightful webinar, Inflectra explores how artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming software development and testing. Discover how AI-powered tools are revolutionizing every stage of the software development lifecycle (SDLC), from design and prototyping to testing, deployment, and monitoring.
Learn about:
• The Future of Testing: How AI is shifting testing towards verification, analysis, and higher-level skills, while reducing repetitive tasks.
• Test Automation: How AI-powered test case generation, optimization, and self-healing tests are making testing more efficient and effective.
• Visual Testing: Explore the emerging capabilities of AI in visual testing and how it's set to revolutionize UI verification.
• Inflectra's AI Solutions: See demonstrations of Inflectra's cutting-edge AI tools like the ChatGPT plugin and Azure Open AI platform, designed to streamline your testing process.
Whether you're a developer, tester, or QA professional, this webinar will give you valuable insights into how AI is shaping the future of software delivery.
Connector Corner: Automate dynamic content and events by pushing a buttonDianaGray10
Here is something new! In our next Connector Corner webinar, we will demonstrate how you can use a single workflow to:
Create a campaign using Mailchimp with merge tags/fields
Send an interactive Slack channel message (using buttons)
Have the message received by managers and peers along with a test email for review
But there’s more:
In a second workflow supporting the same use case, you’ll see:
Your campaign sent to target colleagues for approval
If the “Approve” button is clicked, a Jira/Zendesk ticket is created for the marketing design team
But—if the “Reject” button is pushed, colleagues will be alerted via Slack message
Join us to learn more about this new, human-in-the-loop capability, brought to you by Integration Service connectors.
And...
Speakers:
Akshay Agnihotri, Product Manager
Charlie Greenberg, Host
Dev Dives: Train smarter, not harder – active learning and UiPath LLMs for do...UiPathCommunity
💥 Speed, accuracy, and scaling – discover the superpowers of GenAI in action with UiPath Document Understanding and Communications Mining™:
See how to accelerate model training and optimize model performance with active learning
Learn about the latest enhancements to out-of-the-box document processing – with little to no training required
Get an exclusive demo of the new family of UiPath LLMs – GenAI models specialized for processing different types of documents and messages
This is a hands-on session specifically designed for automation developers and AI enthusiasts seeking to enhance their knowledge in leveraging the latest intelligent document processing capabilities offered by UiPath.
Speakers:
👨🏫 Andras Palfi, Senior Product Manager, UiPath
👩🏫 Lenka Dulovicova, Product Program Manager, UiPath
GraphRAG is All You need? LLM & Knowledge GraphGuy Korland
Guy Korland, CEO and Co-founder of FalkorDB, will review two articles on the integration of language models with knowledge graphs.
1. Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmap.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.08302
2. Microsoft Research's GraphRAG paper and a review paper on various uses of knowledge graphs:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/blog/graphrag-unlocking-llm-discovery-on-narrative-private-data/
Epistemic Interaction - tuning interfaces to provide information for AI supportAlan Dix
Paper presented at SYNERGY workshop at AVI 2024, Genoa, Italy. 3rd June 2024
https://alandix.com/academic/papers/synergy2024-epistemic/
As machine learning integrates deeper into human-computer interactions, the concept of epistemic interaction emerges, aiming to refine these interactions to enhance system adaptability. This approach encourages minor, intentional adjustments in user behaviour to enrich the data available for system learning. This paper introduces epistemic interaction within the context of human-system communication, illustrating how deliberate interaction design can improve system understanding and adaptation. Through concrete examples, we demonstrate the potential of epistemic interaction to significantly advance human-computer interaction by leveraging intuitive human communication strategies to inform system design and functionality, offering a novel pathway for enriching user-system engagements.
State of ICS and IoT Cyber Threat Landscape Report 2024 previewPrayukth K V
The IoT and OT threat landscape report has been prepared by the Threat Research Team at Sectrio using data from Sectrio, cyber threat intelligence farming facilities spread across over 85 cities around the world. In addition, Sectrio also runs AI-based advanced threat and payload engagement facilities that serve as sinks to attract and engage sophisticated threat actors, and newer malware including new variants and latent threats that are at an earlier stage of development.
The latest edition of the OT/ICS and IoT security Threat Landscape Report 2024 also covers:
State of global ICS asset and network exposure
Sectoral targets and attacks as well as the cost of ransom
Global APT activity, AI usage, actor and tactic profiles, and implications
Rise in volumes of AI-powered cyberattacks
Major cyber events in 2024
Malware and malicious payload trends
Cyberattack types and targets
Vulnerability exploit attempts on CVEs
Attacks on counties – USA
Expansion of bot farms – how, where, and why
In-depth analysis of the cyber threat landscape across North America, South America, Europe, APAC, and the Middle East
Why are attacks on smart factories rising?
Cyber risk predictions
Axis of attacks – Europe
Systemic attacks in the Middle East
Download the full report from here:
https://sectrio.com/resources/ot-threat-landscape-reports/sectrio-releases-ot-ics-and-iot-security-threat-landscape-report-2024/
Search and Society: Reimagining Information Access for Radical FuturesBhaskar Mitra
The field of Information retrieval (IR) is currently undergoing a transformative shift, at least partly due to the emerging applications of generative AI to information access. In this talk, we will deliberate on the sociotechnical implications of generative AI for information access. We will argue that there is both a critical necessity and an exciting opportunity for the IR community to re-center our research agendas on societal needs while dismantling the artificial separation between the work on fairness, accountability, transparency, and ethics in IR and the rest of IR research. Instead of adopting a reactionary strategy of trying to mitigate potential social harms from emerging technologies, the community should aim to proactively set the research agenda for the kinds of systems we should build inspired by diverse explicitly stated sociotechnical imaginaries. The sociotechnical imaginaries that underpin the design and development of information access technologies needs to be explicitly articulated, and we need to develop theories of change in context of these diverse perspectives. Our guiding future imaginaries must be informed by other academic fields, such as democratic theory and critical theory, and should be co-developed with social science scholars, legal scholars, civil rights and social justice activists, and artists, among others.
PHP Frameworks: I want to break free (IPC Berlin 2024)Ralf Eggert
In this presentation, we examine the challenges and limitations of relying too heavily on PHP frameworks in web development. We discuss the history of PHP and its frameworks to understand how this dependence has evolved. The focus will be on providing concrete tips and strategies to reduce reliance on these frameworks, based on real-world examples and practical considerations. The goal is to equip developers with the skills and knowledge to create more flexible and future-proof web applications. We'll explore the importance of maintaining autonomy in a rapidly changing tech landscape and how to make informed decisions in PHP development.
This talk is aimed at encouraging a more independent approach to using PHP frameworks, moving towards a more flexible and future-proof approach to PHP development.
Transcript: Selling digital books in 2024: Insights from industry leaders - T...BookNet Canada
The publishing industry has been selling digital audiobooks and ebooks for over a decade and has found its groove. What’s changed? What has stayed the same? Where do we go from here? Join a group of leading sales peers from across the industry for a conversation about the lessons learned since the popularization of digital books, best practices, digital book supply chain management, and more.
Link to video recording: https://bnctechforum.ca/sessions/selling-digital-books-in-2024-insights-from-industry-leaders/
Presented by BookNet Canada on May 28, 2024, with support from the Department of Canadian Heritage.
Kubernetes & AI - Beauty and the Beast !?! @KCD Istanbul 2024Tobias Schneck
As AI technology is pushing into IT I was wondering myself, as an “infrastructure container kubernetes guy”, how get this fancy AI technology get managed from an infrastructure operational view? Is it possible to apply our lovely cloud native principals as well? What benefit’s both technologies could bring to each other?
Let me take this questions and provide you a short journey through existing deployment models and use cases for AI software. On practical examples, we discuss what cloud/on-premise strategy we may need for applying it to our own infrastructure to get it to work from an enterprise perspective. I want to give an overview about infrastructure requirements and technologies, what could be beneficial or limiting your AI use cases in an enterprise environment. An interactive Demo will give you some insides, what approaches I got already working for real.
"Impact of front-end architecture on development cost", Viktor TurskyiFwdays
I have heard many times that architecture is not important for the front-end. Also, many times I have seen how developers implement features on the front-end just following the standard rules for a framework and think that this is enough to successfully launch the project, and then the project fails. How to prevent this and what approach to choose? I have launched dozens of complex projects and during the talk we will analyze which approaches have worked for me and which have not.
2. llari Henrik Aegerter
Managing Director – House of Test
Executive at Large – Association for Software Testing (AST)
President – International Society for Software Testing (ISST)
@ilarihenrik
27. We are uncovering better ways of developing
software by doing it and helping others do it.
Through this work we have come to value:
Individuals and interactions over processes and tools
Working software over comprehensive documentation
Customer collaboration over contract negotiation
Responding to change over following a plan
That is, while there is value in the items on
the right, we value the items on the left more.
Agile Manifesto
28. 1. The value of any practice depends on its context
2. There are good practices in context, but there are no best practices.
3. People, working together, are the most important part of any project’s context.
4. Projects unfold over time in ways that are often not predictable.
5. The product is a solution. If the problem isn’t solved, the product doesn’t work.
6. Good software testing is a challenging intellectual process.
7. Only through judgment and skill, exercised cooperatively throughout the entire
project, are we able to do the right things at the right times to effectively test our
products.
Context-Driven
29. PTE Agile Testing Manifesto
We believe that... By that we mean...
1 our main work product is
information relevant to people
who matter
We give feedback about the product as early as possible in a lean way, asking questions and providing information during pair
programming to prevent bugs.We report truthfully, concisely, allowing stakeholders to make informed decisions.We rapidly
uncover and report significant risks to the project.
2 we as testers explore the
differences between perception,
desire and reality
We understand that things can be different. Sometimes those differences are important. We uncover what those differences are
and where they may lead to problems. We discover new information by the skilled application of exploratory testing.
3 testing is a collaborative
endeavour
Testing is not delegated to testers only, but should also be done by everyone else in the team. The expertise of both testers and
developers enables a broader testing coverage. We closely collaborate with developers and work side-by-side every day.
4 learning about the domain is
crucial to doing a good job
No one has all the answers up front. Project requirements evolve over time. Rather than follow a rote plan, we learn as we test
and we use what we learn to guide what we test next. We aim to understand eBay systems and share our knowledge with our
peers.
5 ignorance about the domain is
not a reason not to test
We don't wait for a complete set of documentation and instructions before we start testing, but we apply good testing practices
at any given time.
6 the space between automation
and manual testing is a
continuum
Humans excel at qualitative analysis - we notice things. Machines do quantitative analysis very well - rapidly making boolean
choices. Our approach combines the two, ensuring that machines are employed for what they do best (automation, repetition
and tooling), while the rest is left to humans.
7 developing tools for the benefit
of all teams supports overall
productivity
We can be more effective if shared tools are in place to optimize repetitive tasks and avoid solving the same problem multiple
times. Those tools can either be sourced from outside or built in-house.
8 metrics are a way to start a
conversation and not to end it
Sometimes metrics are selected simply because they are easily available and not because their construct validity has been
established. Misapplied metrics can cause a lot of harm. We use metrics to help us achieve results, hence we value inquiry
metrics over evaluation metrics. http://www.developsense.com/blog/2009/01/meaningful-metrics/
9 we are not the gatekeepers of
quality
We provide information to allow others to make informed decisions, including "ship" / "no ship" decisions. We highlight risks. It is
up to our stakeholders to decide what to do based on that information.
10 our approach is applicable eBay
wide
We believe that an agile, embedded approach fosters close working relationships between testers and other roles. It helps
deliver more value more quickly and reduces unnecessary overhead.
www.ilari.com/agile
30. “By no means we want to put
ourselves above other testers.
We are just different. And by
different, we mean better.”
Ben Kelly, 2014
Algoritmisches vs. Heuristisches Vorgehen
Binäre (oder diskrete, oder kontinuierliche) Evaluation -> erwarteter Ausgang bekannt
Verletzung einer expliziten Erwartung
vs.
Verletzung einer impliziten Erwartung