I do not have enough context to provide four "Jim Crow" examples from the given document. The document discusses various topics related to the Supreme Court's interpretation of First Amendment rights but does not mention "Jim Crow" or provide any related examples.

1. 2.1 – Daily Sheet 3

2. 
How does the Supreme Court interpret 1st
Amendment Rights

3. 



Rights: Powers or privileges granted to people
either by an agreement among themselves or by
law.
Affirmative Action: A policy in educational
admissions or job hiring that gives special
attention or compensatory treatment to
traditionally disadvantaged groups in an effort
to overcome present effects of past
discrimination.
Unjust: not fair, wrong
Obligated: legally or morally bound

4. 
Establishment clause: “Congress shall make
no law respecting an establishment of
religion.”
 Separation of Church and State (government
doesn’t pick a religion)
▪
▪
▪
▪
Funding to private schools okay
Release time for students okay
Prayer in public schools-students only
Evolution not Creationism

5. 
Free exercise clause: prohibits government
from unduly interfering with the free exercise
of religion
 Can’t stop people from believing what they want
▪ Unless they violate laws protecting health, safety, or
morals of country.
▪ Flag Salute

6. 
What is speech?
 Pure Speech: Verbal expression
of thought and opinion
 Symbolic Speech: using actions
and symbols, instead of words,
to express opinions

7. 
Can be limited if it causes a “clear and
present danger” (Schenk v. US 1919)
 Schenk printed posters urging draft
dodging during WWI

8. 
Speech not Protected:
 Defamatory speech (false speech that
damages a person’s good name)
▪ Slander-Spoken
▪ Libel-Written
 Fighting Words (so insulting that they
provoke immediate violence)
 Student Speech (lewd or indecent
speech, school newspapers)

9. 
Prior restraint: censorship of information before
it is published (not allowed in the states)
 Some limits on press and fair trials
 Radio and television
▪ US v. Playboy 2000 - Cable operators should be allowed to
show sexually oriented programs
▪ Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union 1997 - Internet is
speech
▪ Obscenity - determined by community
▪ Advertising is commercial speech-less protection

10. 
Can assemble to protest but there are limits
 Public order and safety (clear and present danger)

11. 
Provide 4 “Jim Crow”
examples that came
directly from the
video clip.