Creeping Stroke - Venous thrombosis presenting with pc-stroke.pptx
Ā
1509 webinar oligometa lung
1. Management of Oligometastatic
Lung Cancer
Yong Chan Ahn, MD/PhD
Dept. of Radiation Oncology
Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine
2. ā¢ Oligometastasis
ā¢ Oligometastasis in NSCLC
ā¢ SMC Experience of SBRT for
Oligometastasis to Lung
ā¢ Local Treatment for Oligometastasis
ā¢ Clinical Studies/Review
ā¢ Survey
ā¢ Ongoing Trials
ā¢ Take Home Messages
5. Oligometastasis
ā¢ Theory 1st proposed by Hellman and
Weichselbaum in 1995.
ā¢ Along spectrum of locally confined to widely
metastatic cancer, there exists intermediate
āoligometastatic stateā where metastases are
limited in number and location.
Paradigm Stages
Old Early vs Metastatic
New Early ~ Oligometastatic ~ Systemic
Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2011
6. Oligometastasis
ā¢ Eradication of āoligometastasesā with local
ablative Tx could be curative in select patients.
ā¢ Cure is achieved following curative surgical
resection in:
ā Liver metastases from colon cancer
ā Lung metastases from various sites
ā Adrenal metastases from lung cancer
Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2011
7. Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2011
Single & DFI ļ³ 36 months
Multiple or DFI < 36 months
Multiple and DFI < 36 months
Lung meta
8. Oligometastasis
ā¢ Oligometastases have long been recognized as
potentially curable, but were considered rare
exceptions to cancer metastasis paradigm.
ā¢ Oligometastatic state, however, is becoming
more frequently identified with more
sensitive methods.
ā¢ Clinicians will be able to limit ablative local
Tx to only those with true oligometastases.
Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2011
15. Lung Cancer, 2013
Conclusion
ā¢ Patient selection is key determinant:
ā Definitive Tx of primary tumor
ā Long disease-free interval
ā Lack of intra-thoracic nodal metastasis
ā¢ These should be utilized to guide clinical
decision making and design of future studies.
24. Presence of extrathoracic disease was
the only significant factor (p=0.049)
on multivariate analysis.
64.0% vs 38.9%
at 3 years
66.1% vs 0%
at 3 years 71.1% vs 51.1%
at 3 years
Acta Oncol, 2012
25. Conclusion
ā¢ SBRT for single or oligo-metastasis seems
quite effective and safe.
ā¢ Tumor size, disease-free interval, and presence
of extrathoracic disease are prognosticators for
survival.
Acta Oncol, 2012
31. Clinical Practice Points
ā¢ Select oligometastatic NSCLC Pts might benefit
from aggressive Tx to all disease sites:
ā Pts with controlled primary lung cancer are
most likely to experience long-term survival.
ā Pts with metachronous meta experienced the
longest survivals.
ā Pts with synchronous meta and N1-2 disease
had the poorest survivals.
Clinical Lung Cancer, 2014
33. ā¢ Radiation therapy for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
Salama JK, Schild SE. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2015;34(2):183-93.
ā¢ Stereotactic body radiation therapy for oligometastases to the lung: a
phase 2 study. Nuyttens JJ et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;91(2):337-43.
ā¢ Stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastatic disease. Hanna GG et
al. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2015;27(5):290-7.
ā¢ Predictive factors for local control in primary and metastatic lung
tumours after four to five fraction stereotactic ablative body
radiotherapy: a single institution's comprehensive experience. Thibault
I et al. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2014;26(11):713-9.
ā¢ Outcomes and toxicities of stereotactic body radiation therapy for
non-spine bone oligometastases. Owen D et al. Pract Radiat Oncol.
2014;4(2):e143-9.
ā¢ Management of pulmonary oligometastases by stereotactic body
radiotherapy. Gamsiz H et al. Tumori. 2014;100(2):179-83.
ā¢ Radical treatment of synchronous oligometastatic non-small cell
lung carcinoma (NSCLC): patient outcomes and prognostic factors.
Griffioen GH et al. Lung Cancer. 2013;82(1):95-102.
34. ā¢ Reviews:
ā¢ SABR for aggressive local therapy of metastatic cancer: A new
paradigm for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Westover KD et al.
Lung Cancer. 2015;89(2):87-93.
ā¢ Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for pulmonary oligometastases
and oligometastatic lung cancer. Shultz DB et al. J Thorac Oncol.
2014;9(10):1426-33.
37. ā¢ 25-question survey
ā¢ 1,007 respondents from 43
countries
ā¢ SBRT users:
ā¢ Length of practice
ā¢ # patients treated
ā¢ Organs treated
ā¢ Primary reason
ā¢ Dose schedules
ā¢ Future intentions
ā¢ SBRT non-users:
ā¢ Reason for not using SBRT
ā¢ Future intentions
83%
>1/3
Am J Clin Oncol, 2015
38. Reasons for adopting SBRT to treat OM
84%
ā¢ Commonly treated organs: lung (90%), liver
(75%), and spine (70%).
ā¢ Most would offer second SBRT to new OM.
ā¢ 99% planned to continue and 66% planned to
increase SBRT use.
Various dose schedules!
Am J Clin Oncol, 2015
39. Reasons for planning to adopt SBRT
ā¢ The most common reasons for not using SBRT were lack of
clinical efficacy (48%) and/or lack of necessary image guidance
equipment (34%). ļ need for prospective clinical trials!
ā¢ Of those not using SBRT, 59% plan to start soon.
Am J Clin Oncol, 2015
46. Take Home Messages
ā¢ Proportion of patients with OM has been increasing.
ā¢ Management of OM has become challenging.
ā¢ Patients selection is very important:
ā Controlled primary
ā Long DFI (metachronous >> synchronous)
ā Initially low cN stages
ā¢ Consider high dose aggressive local RT (SBRT,
IMRT, IGRT, Particleā¦) to favorable subgroups.