Operations in proofs review
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
0 likes•597 views
This document provides guidance on operations used in proofs. It instructs the reader to first determine if the angles or segments in the proof are larger or smaller than those given, and then to use addition/multiplication if larger or subtraction/division if smaller. It gives examples of diagrams where addition/multiplication or subtraction/division would be used and advises the reader to look for bisectors or midpoints when using multiplication/addition or division/subtraction respectively.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
J.S. Die & Mold - Operations Review 2006-12-21
The document summarizes financial performance for the month and year-to-date compared to budget and the prior year. Revenues were significantly below budget and prior year levels due to lower new tooling sales. Cost of sales were also below budget but higher than the prior year as a percentage of sales, leading to operating losses for the month and year-to-date. A waterfall chart shows profit was impacted most significantly by lower than expected sales volumes. A balanced scorecard shows declining backlog and revenue growth missing targets.
Really Simple Balanced Scorecard
The document outlines a simple balanced scorecard approach developed by Samurai for managers. It discusses establishing a mission, vision, and strategy, then mapping these out on a single page. Key steps include preparing a 1-page summary, communicating it via a 1-slide presentation, and executing the plan on a single page. The balanced scorecard is intended as a management tool to be used in meetings to check measures, achievement, and trends and agree on actions.
Balanced Scorecard Presentation
The Balanced Scorecard is a strategic planning and management system that monitors organizational performance against strategic goals. It was developed in the 1990s to provide a more balanced view of organizational performance than traditional financial measures. The Balanced Scorecard approach uses four perspectives - financial, customer, internal business processes, and learning and growth - to align business activities with an organization's strategic vision. Key to successful implementation is executive commitment, involvement of managers and employees, effective communication, and viewing it as a long-term change rather than a short-term project.
Formative seven june 2015
The document discusses formative assessment and seven student-centered strategies for formative assessment. Formative assessment is an ongoing process used during instruction to provide feedback to teachers and students to guide and improve learning. It is not an instrument, event, or final exam. The seven strategies for formative assessment are: 1) providing a clear learning target, 2) using examples of strong and weak work, 3) offering descriptive feedback, 4) teaching self-assessment and goal setting, 5) focusing lessons on one target at a time, 6) teaching focused revision, and 7) engaging students in self-reflection to track learning.
Differentiated instruction.summer workshop.2015
This document discusses differentiated instruction, which is a systematic approach to teaching students with different abilities and needs. It compares fixed and growth mindsets, explaining that a growth mindset believes success comes from effort rather than innate ability. The document defines differentiated instruction and explains its key principles, including creating a supportive learning environment, using quality curriculum and assessments to inform teaching, and responding to student variance in readiness, interest, and learning profiles. Teachers provide testimonials about how differentiated instruction has helped engage and challenge students of varying abilities.
Literacy summer workshop 2015
This document provides an overview of disciplinary literacy and the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) for a literacy team. It defines disciplinary literacy as merging content knowledge with reading, writing, speaking, and problem solving skills. The CCSS are a set of standards to prepare students for college and careers through literacy in different subjects. The relationship between disciplinary literacy and the CCSS is that the standards require skills like thinking critically and using evidence that are important to different disciplines. The document explains how the CCSS are structured around anchor standards and progressions from kindergarten through 12th grade.
How writing anchors literacy instruction
This document provides guidance for unpacking and aligning writing instruction to the Common Core State Standards anchor writing standards. Participants are instructed to unpack writing anchor standards 1 and 2 using a 5 step protocol. They then review writing samples from the CCSS appendix and discuss gaps between current assignments and the sample work. Groups discuss how writing is currently incorporated in their disciplines and adjustments that could better align assignments to the standards. Participants are asked to consider a small adjustment they could make to a future lesson, unit or assessment to strengthen alignment with the anchor writing standards.
How writing anchirs literacy instruction
This document provides guidance for unpacking and aligning writing instruction to the Common Core State Standards anchor writing standards. Participants are instructed to unpack writing anchor standards 1 and 2 using a protocol. They then review writing samples from the CCSS appendix and discuss gaps between their current assignments and the sample work. Groups discuss how writing is currently incorporated in their disciplines and adjustments that could better align assignments to the standards. Participants are asked to consider a small adjustment they could make to a lesson, unit or assessment to strengthen alignment with the anchor writing standards.
Recommended
J.S. Die & Mold - Operations Review 2006-12-21
The document summarizes financial performance for the month and year-to-date compared to budget and the prior year. Revenues were significantly below budget and prior year levels due to lower new tooling sales. Cost of sales were also below budget but higher than the prior year as a percentage of sales, leading to operating losses for the month and year-to-date. A waterfall chart shows profit was impacted most significantly by lower than expected sales volumes. A balanced scorecard shows declining backlog and revenue growth missing targets.
Really Simple Balanced Scorecard
The document outlines a simple balanced scorecard approach developed by Samurai for managers. It discusses establishing a mission, vision, and strategy, then mapping these out on a single page. Key steps include preparing a 1-page summary, communicating it via a 1-slide presentation, and executing the plan on a single page. The balanced scorecard is intended as a management tool to be used in meetings to check measures, achievement, and trends and agree on actions.
Balanced Scorecard Presentation
The Balanced Scorecard is a strategic planning and management system that monitors organizational performance against strategic goals. It was developed in the 1990s to provide a more balanced view of organizational performance than traditional financial measures. The Balanced Scorecard approach uses four perspectives - financial, customer, internal business processes, and learning and growth - to align business activities with an organization's strategic vision. Key to successful implementation is executive commitment, involvement of managers and employees, effective communication, and viewing it as a long-term change rather than a short-term project.
Formative seven june 2015
The document discusses formative assessment and seven student-centered strategies for formative assessment. Formative assessment is an ongoing process used during instruction to provide feedback to teachers and students to guide and improve learning. It is not an instrument, event, or final exam. The seven strategies for formative assessment are: 1) providing a clear learning target, 2) using examples of strong and weak work, 3) offering descriptive feedback, 4) teaching self-assessment and goal setting, 5) focusing lessons on one target at a time, 6) teaching focused revision, and 7) engaging students in self-reflection to track learning.
Differentiated instruction.summer workshop.2015
This document discusses differentiated instruction, which is a systematic approach to teaching students with different abilities and needs. It compares fixed and growth mindsets, explaining that a growth mindset believes success comes from effort rather than innate ability. The document defines differentiated instruction and explains its key principles, including creating a supportive learning environment, using quality curriculum and assessments to inform teaching, and responding to student variance in readiness, interest, and learning profiles. Teachers provide testimonials about how differentiated instruction has helped engage and challenge students of varying abilities.
Literacy summer workshop 2015
This document provides an overview of disciplinary literacy and the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) for a literacy team. It defines disciplinary literacy as merging content knowledge with reading, writing, speaking, and problem solving skills. The CCSS are a set of standards to prepare students for college and careers through literacy in different subjects. The relationship between disciplinary literacy and the CCSS is that the standards require skills like thinking critically and using evidence that are important to different disciplines. The document explains how the CCSS are structured around anchor standards and progressions from kindergarten through 12th grade.
How writing anchors literacy instruction
This document provides guidance for unpacking and aligning writing instruction to the Common Core State Standards anchor writing standards. Participants are instructed to unpack writing anchor standards 1 and 2 using a 5 step protocol. They then review writing samples from the CCSS appendix and discuss gaps between current assignments and the sample work. Groups discuss how writing is currently incorporated in their disciplines and adjustments that could better align assignments to the standards. Participants are asked to consider a small adjustment they could make to a future lesson, unit or assessment to strengthen alignment with the anchor writing standards.
How writing anchirs literacy instruction
This document provides guidance for unpacking and aligning writing instruction to the Common Core State Standards anchor writing standards. Participants are instructed to unpack writing anchor standards 1 and 2 using a protocol. They then review writing samples from the CCSS appendix and discuss gaps between their current assignments and the sample work. Groups discuss how writing is currently incorporated in their disciplines and adjustments that could better align assignments to the standards. Participants are asked to consider a small adjustment they could make to a lesson, unit or assessment to strengthen alignment with the anchor writing standards.
Close Reading
This document provides an agenda for a training session on how to implement close reading strategies. It will cover why close reading is important, how to model close reading, how to write text-dependent questions, and providing examples for different content areas. Attendees will learn that close reading involves carefully re-reading short texts with a specific purpose in mind. It helps students engage with and understand what texts explicitly say as well as make inferences. The training will provide guidance on selecting appropriate texts and crafting text-dependent questions to facilitate close analysis of key passages.
Finalizing e us & eos
This document discusses enduring understandings (EUs), essential outcomes (EOs), and learning targets (LTs). It defines each term and provides examples. EUs are full sentence generalizations that capture big ideas. EOs include the building blocks, knowledge, and skills needed to achieve the EU. LTs specify what students will know and be able to do by the end of a lesson. The document provides guidance on creating EUs, EOs, and formatting them in a learning management system. Strong and poor examples of each are presented to illustrate the concepts.
Selected Response Assessment
This document provides an overview of a workshop to train participants on evaluating assessment quality using four standards: 1) Does the assessment method reflect the desired outcome, 2) Does the assessment use high-quality items, 3) Does the assessment provide enough evidence of student achievement, and 4) Does the assessment avoid bias. The workshop objectives are to apply these standards to create or revise an assessment. Guidelines are provided for different item types to help create high-quality assessments.
Performance Based Assessment
This document provides an overview of performance assessments and rubrics. It defines a performance assessment as the observation and evaluation of a skill or product. The document outlines the key steps to creating a performance assessment, including identifying the performance to be evaluated, establishing criteria in a rubric, and developing assessment tasks. It also examines the traits of high-quality rubrics, such as having clear content and criteria that are logically categorized into distinct levels of performance. Common rubric errors like emphasizing quantity over quality or including non-essential elements are also discussed.
Introducing the Common Core October 2 2014
This document provides an introduction to the Common Core State Standards for literacy. It outlines the session objectives which are to explain how the CCSS are structured, how they support disciplinary literacy, and how to identify where instructional activities fall in relation to the CCSS progression. It then defines the CCSS, explains why they are important, and discusses how they relate to disciplinary literacy. The document guides participants through unpacking and analyzing sample CCSS standards and determining how to adjust activities to meet grade level expectations. It concludes by outlining next steps to begin implementing the standards.
Using DOK to Write Common Assessments
This document outlines a protocol for unpacking standards into learning targets to improve common assessments. It explains how to analyze standards by underlining verbs, highlighting nouns, circling contexts, and identifying the type of learning target. Teachers will learn how to determine the depth of knowledge ceiling for each target and match assessment item types to target rigor. Sample essential outcomes are unpacked using the protocol steps. Guidelines are provided for constructing response questions that clearly communicate expectations and assessments are written for a sample standard.
Mastery Manager Training
1) Teachers can create assessments in Mastery Manager, including naming the assessment, creating the answer key, and generating and printing forms for students to complete.
2) Completed forms are scanned back into the system, and teachers can generate reports to view student scores and item analysis.
3) Student scores can be exported from Mastery Manager to the school's gradebook system, Infinite Campus.
Mastery manager training 1
This document provides instructions for creating, printing, scanning, and viewing scores for a multiple-choice assessment in Mastery Manager. It outlines the following steps: creating an assessment and answer key; creating and printing answer forms; scanning completed forms; generating score reports; and conventions for naming exams and rubrics in the system. The key functions covered are creating and managing assessments, forms, and reports in Mastery Manager.
Follow up table talk march 18
This document discusses strategies for using rubrics to facilitate formative assessment strategies. It provides examples of how rubrics can be used to:
1) Model strong and weak examples of student work to clarify learning targets (Strategy 2).
2) Provide descriptive feedback to students on their progress toward meeting learning targets (Strategy 3).
3) Guide students in focused revision of their work by identifying specific areas of weakness and directing practice activities (Strategy 6).
Attendees are invited to discuss how they have implemented these strategies using rubrics and how rubrics could be adapted for different content areas.
Revised using rubrics to facilitate self-assessment and self-reflection
This document discusses strategies for using rubrics to facilitate student self-assessment and self-reflection. It explains the importance of formative assessment and strategies 4 and 7, which involve teaching students to self-assess and engage in self-reflection. Four strategies for using rubrics are presented: 1) justifying quality levels with highlighting, 2) matching work to rubric phrases, 3) co-creating rubrics with students, and 4) using rating scales for self-assessment. Examples and steps for implementing each strategy are provided. The document concludes with reviewing the session objectives and references.
3 10-14 formative assessment with the mathematics ccss
The document discusses formative assessment strategies for using the Common Core State Standards in mathematics. It begins with reviewing strategies from a previous meeting, including creating clear learning targets, designing lessons around a single target, teaching self-assessment and goal setting. Examples are given of applying these strategies using specific CCSS, like creating student-friendly targets and sample lesson targets. The agenda concludes with an activity for teachers to work in groups to modify a resource sheet to allow students to set goals and self-reflect on their progress.
Rubrics for Strategies 4 & 7
This document outlines strategies for using rubrics and checklists to facilitate student self-assessment and self-reflection. It discusses 4 strategies: 1) justifying quality levels with highlighting evidence in student work, 2) matching features of work to rubric phrases, 3) co-creating rubrics with students, and 4) using rating scales for self-assessment and setting goals. The purpose is to engage students in assessing their own learning and progress toward standards to increase ownership over the learning process.
Formative assessment with the mathematics ccss
This document discusses strategies for formative assessment using the Common Core State Standards for mathematics. It provides examples of applying four strategies: 1) creating a clear learning target; 5) designing lessons around a single target; 4) teaching self-assessment and goal-setting; and 7) engaging self-reflection. Teachers work in groups to develop student-friendly learning targets from the CCSS and modify a resource sheet for students to track goals and reflect on progress. The purpose is to design formative assessments that focus learning and provide feedback using the CCSS.
Strategies 23 and 6 drogos and beutjer revised
This document outlines how to apply strategies 2, 3, and 6 of formative assessment. Strategy 2 involves using examples of strong and weak student work. Strategy 3 is providing regular descriptive feedback. Strategy 6 is teaching students focused revision. The document explains each strategy and provides examples. It also has activities for readers to practice applying the strategies, including analyzing student work samples, revising feedback, and planning instruction around a learning target.
Using Rubrics for Strategies 4 & 7 johns&bass
This document outlines an agenda for a session on using rubrics to help students self-assess and self-reflect. The objectives are to learn how to select rubrics to facilitate self-assessment and self-reflection, understand different assessment tools that can be used, and create or modify a rubric for current students. The agenda includes identifying self-reflective practices, reviewing strategies for self-assessment and self-reflection, learning how to select effective rubrics, analyzing sample rubrics, and creating a self-assessment tool to use with course rubrics. Examples of rating scales and checklists for self-assessment are also provided.
Goldman & Acuna The Rest of the 7 Student-Centered Strategies of Assessment f...
This document outlines strategies for student-centered formative assessment. It discusses strategies 2, 3, and 6, which involve using examples of strong and weak work, providing descriptive feedback, and teaching focused revision. The document explains how these strategies help answer questions about where students are headed, where they currently are, and how to close gaps. It provides examples and activities to help apply these strategies, such as analyzing samples, writing feedback, and planning for misunderstandings. The overall goal is to help educators implement formative assessment practices to improve student learning.
Rubrics 101
This document provides an overview of rubrics and how to develop high-quality rubrics for assessing student work. It discusses key elements of rubrics such as content, clarity, practicality, and technical quality. Traits of good rubrics include specifying important criteria, aligning with learning outcomes, having distinct descriptive levels, and being written in clear, understandable language. The document also addresses grading student work using rubrics, including converting rubric scores to letter grades using logic tables. Developing valid and reliable rubrics that accurately reflect student learning is important for fair and meaningful assessment.
Meister & Martinez The Rest of the 7 Student-Centered Strategies of Assessmen...
This document outlines strategies for effective formative assessment, including using strong and weak examples, providing effective feedback, and focused revision. It discusses how these strategies help answer the questions of where students are headed, where they currently are, and how to close the gap. The document provides details on implementing each strategy, including defining key concepts, examples, and activities teachers can use in the classroom. It emphasizes using formative assessment to clarify expectations and shape student understanding of quality work.
Applying Formative Assessment Strategies 1 & 5 to the NGSS
This document discusses applying formative assessment strategies 1 and 5 to the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). It begins with an agenda and objectives for the session. The attendees then participate in a think-pair-share activity. The presenters explain key aspects of NGSS, including the three dimensions and science and engineering practices. The attendees are asked to apply strategy 1 by writing a student-friendly learning target based on one of the practices. They then apply strategy 5 by identifying a typical student misconception and designing a lesson to address it. Groups then share their work. The overall summary is that the document guides teachers through applying two formative assessment strategies to help design NGSS-aligned lessons that address common student misunder
Strategy 5: Making it Work Logistically
Strategy 5 focuses on designing lessons to close typical gaps in student learning by focusing instruction on one misunderstanding or aspect of quality at a time. Examples are provided for identifying misconceptions and using focused practice and short assignments to help students correct them. The document discusses how Strategy 5 works with Strategy 6, which teaches focused revision, to help students improve areas they typically struggle with.
More Related Content
More from Jeremy
Close Reading
This document provides an agenda for a training session on how to implement close reading strategies. It will cover why close reading is important, how to model close reading, how to write text-dependent questions, and providing examples for different content areas. Attendees will learn that close reading involves carefully re-reading short texts with a specific purpose in mind. It helps students engage with and understand what texts explicitly say as well as make inferences. The training will provide guidance on selecting appropriate texts and crafting text-dependent questions to facilitate close analysis of key passages.
Finalizing e us & eos
This document discusses enduring understandings (EUs), essential outcomes (EOs), and learning targets (LTs). It defines each term and provides examples. EUs are full sentence generalizations that capture big ideas. EOs include the building blocks, knowledge, and skills needed to achieve the EU. LTs specify what students will know and be able to do by the end of a lesson. The document provides guidance on creating EUs, EOs, and formatting them in a learning management system. Strong and poor examples of each are presented to illustrate the concepts.
Selected Response Assessment
This document provides an overview of a workshop to train participants on evaluating assessment quality using four standards: 1) Does the assessment method reflect the desired outcome, 2) Does the assessment use high-quality items, 3) Does the assessment provide enough evidence of student achievement, and 4) Does the assessment avoid bias. The workshop objectives are to apply these standards to create or revise an assessment. Guidelines are provided for different item types to help create high-quality assessments.
Performance Based Assessment
This document provides an overview of performance assessments and rubrics. It defines a performance assessment as the observation and evaluation of a skill or product. The document outlines the key steps to creating a performance assessment, including identifying the performance to be evaluated, establishing criteria in a rubric, and developing assessment tasks. It also examines the traits of high-quality rubrics, such as having clear content and criteria that are logically categorized into distinct levels of performance. Common rubric errors like emphasizing quantity over quality or including non-essential elements are also discussed.
Introducing the Common Core October 2 2014
This document provides an introduction to the Common Core State Standards for literacy. It outlines the session objectives which are to explain how the CCSS are structured, how they support disciplinary literacy, and how to identify where instructional activities fall in relation to the CCSS progression. It then defines the CCSS, explains why they are important, and discusses how they relate to disciplinary literacy. The document guides participants through unpacking and analyzing sample CCSS standards and determining how to adjust activities to meet grade level expectations. It concludes by outlining next steps to begin implementing the standards.
Using DOK to Write Common Assessments
This document outlines a protocol for unpacking standards into learning targets to improve common assessments. It explains how to analyze standards by underlining verbs, highlighting nouns, circling contexts, and identifying the type of learning target. Teachers will learn how to determine the depth of knowledge ceiling for each target and match assessment item types to target rigor. Sample essential outcomes are unpacked using the protocol steps. Guidelines are provided for constructing response questions that clearly communicate expectations and assessments are written for a sample standard.
Mastery Manager Training
1) Teachers can create assessments in Mastery Manager, including naming the assessment, creating the answer key, and generating and printing forms for students to complete.
2) Completed forms are scanned back into the system, and teachers can generate reports to view student scores and item analysis.
3) Student scores can be exported from Mastery Manager to the school's gradebook system, Infinite Campus.
Mastery manager training 1
This document provides instructions for creating, printing, scanning, and viewing scores for a multiple-choice assessment in Mastery Manager. It outlines the following steps: creating an assessment and answer key; creating and printing answer forms; scanning completed forms; generating score reports; and conventions for naming exams and rubrics in the system. The key functions covered are creating and managing assessments, forms, and reports in Mastery Manager.
Follow up table talk march 18
This document discusses strategies for using rubrics to facilitate formative assessment strategies. It provides examples of how rubrics can be used to:
1) Model strong and weak examples of student work to clarify learning targets (Strategy 2).
2) Provide descriptive feedback to students on their progress toward meeting learning targets (Strategy 3).
3) Guide students in focused revision of their work by identifying specific areas of weakness and directing practice activities (Strategy 6).
Attendees are invited to discuss how they have implemented these strategies using rubrics and how rubrics could be adapted for different content areas.
Revised using rubrics to facilitate self-assessment and self-reflection
This document discusses strategies for using rubrics to facilitate student self-assessment and self-reflection. It explains the importance of formative assessment and strategies 4 and 7, which involve teaching students to self-assess and engage in self-reflection. Four strategies for using rubrics are presented: 1) justifying quality levels with highlighting, 2) matching work to rubric phrases, 3) co-creating rubrics with students, and 4) using rating scales for self-assessment. Examples and steps for implementing each strategy are provided. The document concludes with reviewing the session objectives and references.
3 10-14 formative assessment with the mathematics ccss
The document discusses formative assessment strategies for using the Common Core State Standards in mathematics. It begins with reviewing strategies from a previous meeting, including creating clear learning targets, designing lessons around a single target, teaching self-assessment and goal setting. Examples are given of applying these strategies using specific CCSS, like creating student-friendly targets and sample lesson targets. The agenda concludes with an activity for teachers to work in groups to modify a resource sheet to allow students to set goals and self-reflect on their progress.
Rubrics for Strategies 4 & 7
This document outlines strategies for using rubrics and checklists to facilitate student self-assessment and self-reflection. It discusses 4 strategies: 1) justifying quality levels with highlighting evidence in student work, 2) matching features of work to rubric phrases, 3) co-creating rubrics with students, and 4) using rating scales for self-assessment and setting goals. The purpose is to engage students in assessing their own learning and progress toward standards to increase ownership over the learning process.
Formative assessment with the mathematics ccss
This document discusses strategies for formative assessment using the Common Core State Standards for mathematics. It provides examples of applying four strategies: 1) creating a clear learning target; 5) designing lessons around a single target; 4) teaching self-assessment and goal-setting; and 7) engaging self-reflection. Teachers work in groups to develop student-friendly learning targets from the CCSS and modify a resource sheet for students to track goals and reflect on progress. The purpose is to design formative assessments that focus learning and provide feedback using the CCSS.
Strategies 23 and 6 drogos and beutjer revised
This document outlines how to apply strategies 2, 3, and 6 of formative assessment. Strategy 2 involves using examples of strong and weak student work. Strategy 3 is providing regular descriptive feedback. Strategy 6 is teaching students focused revision. The document explains each strategy and provides examples. It also has activities for readers to practice applying the strategies, including analyzing student work samples, revising feedback, and planning instruction around a learning target.
Using Rubrics for Strategies 4 & 7 johns&bass
This document outlines an agenda for a session on using rubrics to help students self-assess and self-reflect. The objectives are to learn how to select rubrics to facilitate self-assessment and self-reflection, understand different assessment tools that can be used, and create or modify a rubric for current students. The agenda includes identifying self-reflective practices, reviewing strategies for self-assessment and self-reflection, learning how to select effective rubrics, analyzing sample rubrics, and creating a self-assessment tool to use with course rubrics. Examples of rating scales and checklists for self-assessment are also provided.
Goldman & Acuna The Rest of the 7 Student-Centered Strategies of Assessment f...
This document outlines strategies for student-centered formative assessment. It discusses strategies 2, 3, and 6, which involve using examples of strong and weak work, providing descriptive feedback, and teaching focused revision. The document explains how these strategies help answer questions about where students are headed, where they currently are, and how to close gaps. It provides examples and activities to help apply these strategies, such as analyzing samples, writing feedback, and planning for misunderstandings. The overall goal is to help educators implement formative assessment practices to improve student learning.
Rubrics 101
This document provides an overview of rubrics and how to develop high-quality rubrics for assessing student work. It discusses key elements of rubrics such as content, clarity, practicality, and technical quality. Traits of good rubrics include specifying important criteria, aligning with learning outcomes, having distinct descriptive levels, and being written in clear, understandable language. The document also addresses grading student work using rubrics, including converting rubric scores to letter grades using logic tables. Developing valid and reliable rubrics that accurately reflect student learning is important for fair and meaningful assessment.
Meister & Martinez The Rest of the 7 Student-Centered Strategies of Assessmen...
This document outlines strategies for effective formative assessment, including using strong and weak examples, providing effective feedback, and focused revision. It discusses how these strategies help answer the questions of where students are headed, where they currently are, and how to close the gap. The document provides details on implementing each strategy, including defining key concepts, examples, and activities teachers can use in the classroom. It emphasizes using formative assessment to clarify expectations and shape student understanding of quality work.
Applying Formative Assessment Strategies 1 & 5 to the NGSS
This document discusses applying formative assessment strategies 1 and 5 to the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). It begins with an agenda and objectives for the session. The attendees then participate in a think-pair-share activity. The presenters explain key aspects of NGSS, including the three dimensions and science and engineering practices. The attendees are asked to apply strategy 1 by writing a student-friendly learning target based on one of the practices. They then apply strategy 5 by identifying a typical student misconception and designing a lesson to address it. Groups then share their work. The overall summary is that the document guides teachers through applying two formative assessment strategies to help design NGSS-aligned lessons that address common student misunder
Strategy 5: Making it Work Logistically
Strategy 5 focuses on designing lessons to close typical gaps in student learning by focusing instruction on one misunderstanding or aspect of quality at a time. Examples are provided for identifying misconceptions and using focused practice and short assignments to help students correct them. The document discusses how Strategy 5 works with Strategy 6, which teaches focused revision, to help students improve areas they typically struggle with.
More from Jeremy (20)
Revised using rubrics to facilitate self-assessment and self-reflection
Revised using rubrics to facilitate self-assessment and self-reflection
3 10-14 formative assessment with the mathematics ccss
3 10-14 formative assessment with the mathematics ccss
Goldman & Acuna The Rest of the 7 Student-Centered Strategies of Assessment f...
Goldman & Acuna The Rest of the 7 Student-Centered Strategies of Assessment f...
Meister & Martinez The Rest of the 7 Student-Centered Strategies of Assessmen...
Meister & Martinez The Rest of the 7 Student-Centered Strategies of Assessmen...
Applying Formative Assessment Strategies 1 & 5 to the NGSS
Applying Formative Assessment Strategies 1 & 5 to the NGSS
Recently uploaded
مصحف القراءات العشر أعد أحرف الخلاف سمير بسيوني.pdf
مصحف أحرف الخلاف للقراء العشرةأعد أحرف الخلاف بالتلوين وصلا سمير بسيوني غفر الله له
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) Curriculum
(𝐓𝐋𝐄 𝟏𝟎𝟎) (𝐋𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝟏)-𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐬
𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐏𝐏 𝐂𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐮𝐦 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬:
- Understand the goals and objectives of the Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) curriculum, recognizing its importance in fostering practical life skills and values among students. Students will also be able to identify the key components and subjects covered, such as agriculture, home economics, industrial arts, and information and communication technology.
𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐒𝐜𝐨𝐩𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧 𝐄𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐮𝐫:
-Define entrepreneurship, distinguishing it from general business activities by emphasizing its focus on innovation, risk-taking, and value creation. Students will describe the characteristics and traits of successful entrepreneurs, including their roles and responsibilities, and discuss the broader economic and social impacts of entrepreneurial activities on both local and global scales.
Leveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit Innovation
In this webinar, participants learned how to utilize Generative AI to streamline operations and elevate member engagement. Amazon Web Service experts provided a customer specific use cases and dived into low/no-code tools that are quick and easy to deploy through Amazon Web Service (AWS.)
Andreas Schleicher presents PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Thinking - 18 Jun...
Andreas Schleicher, Director of Education and Skills at the OECD presents at the launch of PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Minds, Creative Schools on 18 June 2024.
Stack Memory Organization of 8086 Microprocessor
The stack memory organization of 8086 microprocessor.
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Aberdeen
HYPERTENSION - SLIDE SHARE PRESENTATION.
IT WILL BE HELPFULL FOR THE NUSING STUDENTS
IT FOCUSED ON MEDICAL MANAGEMENT AND NURSING MANAGEMENT.
HIGHLIGHTS ON HEALTH EDUCATION.
Traditional Musical Instruments of Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh - RAYH...
Traditional Musical Instruments of Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh
Bossa N’ Roll Records by Ismael Vazquez.
Bossa N Roll Records presentation by Izzy Vazquez for Music Retail and Distribution class at Full Sail University
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation results
The temple and the sanctuary around were dedicated to Asklepios Zmidrenus. This name has been known since 1875 when an inscription dedicated to him was discovered in Rome. The inscription is dated in 227 AD and was left by soldiers originating from the city of Philippopolis (modern Plovdiv).
How Barcodes Can Be Leveraged Within Odoo 17
In this presentation, we will explore how barcodes can be leveraged within Odoo 17 to streamline our manufacturing processes. We will cover the configuration steps, how to utilize barcodes in different manufacturing scenarios, and the overall benefits of implementing this technology.
Wound healing PPT
This document provides an overview of wound healing, its functions, stages, mechanisms, factors affecting it, and complications.
A wound is a break in the integrity of the skin or tissues, which may be associated with disruption of the structure and function.
Healing is the body’s response to injury in an attempt to restore normal structure and functions.
Healing can occur in two ways: Regeneration and Repair
There are 4 phases of wound healing: hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. This document also describes the mechanism of wound healing. Factors that affect healing include infection, uncontrolled diabetes, poor nutrition, age, anemia, the presence of foreign bodies, etc.
Complications of wound healing like infection, hyperpigmentation of scar, contractures, and keloid formation.
Recently uploaded (20)
NEWSPAPERS - QUESTION 1 - REVISION POWERPOINT.pptx
NEWSPAPERS - QUESTION 1 - REVISION POWERPOINT.pptx
مصحف القراءات العشر أعد أحرف الخلاف سمير بسيوني.pdf
مصحف القراءات العشر أعد أحرف الخلاف سمير بسيوني.pdf
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) Curriculum
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) Curriculum
Leveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit Innovation
Leveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit Innovation
Andreas Schleicher presents PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Thinking - 18 Jun...
Andreas Schleicher presents PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Thinking - 18 Jun...
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
Traditional Musical Instruments of Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh - RAYH...
Traditional Musical Instruments of Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh - RAYH...
Operations in proofs review
- 2. First Question to Ask Are the angles/segments in my prove or larger or smaller than the angles/segments in my given? Prove is larger than given Prove is smaller than given Addition/Multiplication Subtraction/Division
- 3. Examples Given the diagram, determine whether addition/multiplication will be used or subtraction/division Subtraction/ Division Addition/ Multiplication
- 4. Examples Given the diagram, determine whether addition/multiplication will be used or subtraction/division Addition/ Multiplication Subtraction/ Division
- 5. Addition/Multiplication Now What? Look for 2 bisectors or 2 midpoints! Multiplication Addition
- 6. Subtraction/Division Now What? Look for 2 bisectors or 2 midpoints! Division Subtraction