112921, 349 PM Preview Rubric 4.27.2 Article (100 points)

11/29/21, 3:49 PM Preview Rubric: 4.2/7.2 Article (100 points)
- 3FA2021 Craft Academic Writing for Bus (BADM-700-01D) -
Indiana Wesleyan University
https://brightspace.indwes.edu/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=15
4830&rubricId=471972&originTool=quicklinks 1/3
4.2/7.2 Article (100 points)
Course: 3FA2021 Craft Academic Writing for Bus (BADM-700-
01D)
Criteria Excellent Competent
Needs
Improvement
Inadequate/Faili
ng
Criterion Score
Quality of
Article
Content
/ 50
Organization
of the Article

Content
/ 20
50 points
Information in
the article is
comprehensive,
accurate, and
relevant, includes
details to add
interest, provide
examples, and
demonstrate
objective, critical
thinking.
45 points
Information in
the article is
accurate and

relevant, includes
adequate details
and examples,
and
demonstrated
objective, critical
thinking.
35 points
Information in
the article is
limited, but
accurate and
relevant, includes
minimal details
and examples,
and
demonstrates
some objective,

critical thinking.
30 points
Information in
the article does
not meet minimal
criteria for
accuracy, detail,
or demonstration
of critical
thinking.
20 points
The article is
organized
professionally
and effectively
and or creatively
with inclusion of
the following:

Clear main idea.
Logical sequence
of topics.
Balanced
partition of
topics.
Use of
transitions and
summaries.
18 points
The article is
organized with
inclusion of the
following:
Clear main idea.
Logical sequence
of topics.
Balanced

partition of
topics.
Use of
transitions and
summaries.
16 points
The article shows
an effort to be
organized, but
has some
disorganization
in the following
areas:
Clear main idea.
Logical sequence
of topics.
Balanced
partition of

topics.
Use of
transitions and
summaries.
14 points
The article is
disorganized or
lacks cohesion,
flow, and
proportion in the
following areas.
Clear main idea.
Logical sequence
of topics.
Balanced
partition of
topics.
Use of

transitions and
summaries.
Total / 100
Criteria Excellent Competent
Needs
Improvement
Inadequate/Faili
ng
Criterion Score
Written
Communicatio
n
/ 20
APA / 10
20 points

The article is
written
professionally
and exhibits
excellent
communication
when applying
English Grammar
Standards and
the 7 C's of
writing: clear,
concise,
complete,
correct,
correlated to the
research,
creative, and
critical thinking.

18 points
The article is
written
competently and
evidences
proficient
communication
when applying
English Grammar
Standards and
the 7 C's of
writing: clear,
concise,
complete,
correct,
correlated to the
research,
creative, and

critical thinking.
16 points
The article is
readable and
demonstrates
emergent
communication
skills that are in
need of
improvement in
the application
of English
Grammar
Standards and
the 7 C's of
writing: clear,
concise,
complete,

correct,
correlated to the
research,
creative, and
critical thinking.
14 points
The article is
inadequate and
has substantial
deficiencies in
communication
in the application
of English
Grammar
Standards and
the 7 C's of
writing: clear,
concise,

complete,
correct,
correlated to the
research,
creative, and
critical thinking.
10 points
Excellent use of
APA standards in
the format of the
document,
citations, and
references.
9 points
Proficient use of
APA standards in
the format of the
document,

citations, and
references. A few
minor errors are
present.
7 points
Needs
improvement in
the use of APA
standards in the
format of the
document,
citations, and
references. A
number of errors
are present.
6 points
Inadequate or
non-use of APA

standards in the
format of the
document,
citations, and
references.
Several errors
exist and or
disregards proper
use standards.
Overall Score
Excellent
63 points minimum
Competent
56 points minimum
Needs Improvement

49 points minimum
Inadequate/Failing
0 points minimum
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is for learners to:
1. Have the opportunity to integrate knowledge and skills
learned throughout all core courses
2. Demonstrate an advancing understanding of the patient with a
mental health disorder in primary care.
3. Demonstrate the ability to analyze the literature/ previous
patients seen in the clinical setting be able to perform an
evidenced-based review of their case, diagnosis, and plan, while
guiding and taking feedback from peers regarding the case.
4. Demonstrate professional communication and leadership,
while advancing the education of peers.
Activity Learning Outcomes
Through this discussion, the student will demonstrate the ability
to:
1. Interpret subjective and objective data to develop appropriate
diagnoses and evidence based management plans for patients
and families with complex or multiple diagnoses across the
lifespan. (CO 1)
2. Develop management plans based on current scientific
evidence and national guidelines. (CO 4)
Requirements:
Part 2- Turning in your final treatment plan and Analysis
The final treatment plan will include the primary diagnosis,
diagnostic testing recommended by National Guidelines.
Medications, interventions, education, labs, follow up, referrals.
After completing the treatment plan include the following
sections in a large area called ANALYSIS:
1. Pathophysiology and Pharmacology: For the primary
diagnoses in the case, write a brief summary of the underlying

pathophysiology and tie pharmacological treatment chosen in
the reversal or control of that pathology.
2. Additional analysis of the case: This includes national
guidelines that were or should have been used to make diagnosis
or treatment and review how they applied or how care was
unique but based in guidelines.
3. Follow-up/Referrals: This means how the patient was doing
when seen a second time if this applies. This would be their
response to your plan of care. OR when Follow up will occur
and what actions will be taken on the follow up visit. Referrals
if indicated.
4. Quality: Include anything that should have been considered
in hindsight or changes you would make in seeing similar
patients in the future with the same complaint, history, exam, or
diagnosis. Add anything you learned from discussion in the
class that shed new light on this patient.
5. Coding and Billing. Any or all CPT and ICD-10 codes that
should have been used (List them and name them only.
Written in a word document and submitted in the Week 6 case
study summary submission box.
DISCUSSION CONTENT
Category
Points
%
Description
Application of Course Knowledge
25
63%
Post contributes clinically accurateperspectives/insights
applicable to the results from the physical exam and diagnoses.
Initial post includes the most likely diagnosis/specific treatment
plan given case study information supported by rationaleand
answers all questions presented in the case. Demonstrates
course knowledge/assigned readings by: linking
tests/interventions accuratelyto diagnoses, applies learned

knowledge specifically to thesymptoms and patient
informationusing original dialogue i.e., little to no direct
quotes.
Evidence Based resources
10
25%
Discussion post supported by evidence from appropriate sources
published within the last five years. Focus of journal articles
represents a logical link between the article content and the case
study information. In-text citations and full references are
provided.
35
88%
Total CONTENT Points= 35 pts
DISCUSSION FORMAT
APA/Grammar/Spelling
5
12%
Discussion post presented in a logical, meaningful, and
understandable sequence. Headings reflect separation of
criterion outlined in assignment guidelines.
**Direct quote should not exceed 15 words & must add
substantively to the discussion
Discussion post has minimal grammar, spelling, syntax,
punctuation and APA* errors. Direct quotes (if used) is limited
to 1short statement** which adds substantively to the post.
* APA style references and in text citations are required;
however, there are no deductions for errors in indentation or
spacing of references. All elements of the reference otherwise
must be included.
5
12%
Total FORMAT Points= 5 pts

40
100%
DISCUSSION TOTAL= 40 points
Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion
Content Possible Points = 35 Points
Application of Course Knowledge:
Thorough treatment plan and analysis of the following for
summary: guidelines that should have been used, what further
should have been added to care or follow up, lessons learned
from this and class discussion. The final analysis section must
also contain: *Pathophysiology and Pharmacology analysis
*Additional analysis of the case as noted above *Follow -up
*Quality Analysis *Coding and Billing
using original dialogue i.e., no direct quotes. Diagnostic testing
recommended follows National Guidelines.
Clinical insights are supported by rationale and student
addresses all assignment criterion.
25 pts
Excellent
Thorough treatment plan and analysis of the following for
summary: guidelines that should have been used, what further
should have been added to care or follow up, lessons learned
from this and class discussion. The final analysis section must

also contain: *Pathophysiology and Pharmacology analysis
*Additional analysis of the case as noted above *Follow-up
*Quality Analysis *Coding and Billing using original dialogue
i.e., no direct quotes. Diagnostic testing recommended follows
National Guidelines. Clinical insights are supported by rationale
and student addresses all assignment criterion.
23 pts
V. Good
Some accurate clinical application of treatment plan and
analysis of the following for summary: guidelines that should
have been used, what further should have been added to care or
follow up, lessons learned from this and class discussion. The
final analysis section must also contain: *Pathophysiology and
Pharmacology analysis *Additional analysis of the case as noted
above *Follow-up *Quality Analysis *Coding and Billing using
original dialogue i.e., no direct quotes. Diagnostic testing
recommended follows National Guidelines. Clinical insights are
supported by rationale and student addresses all assignment
criterion.
21 pts
Satisfactory
Some accurate clinical application of treatment plan and
analysis of the following for summary: however guidelines only
generally discussed without reflection on actual treatment
decisions that should have been made. The final analysis section
missing at least one: *Pathophysiology and Pharmacology
analysis *Additional analysis of the case as noted above
*Follow-up *Quality Analysis *Coding and Billing using
original dialogue i.e., no direct quotes. Diagnostic testing
recommended follows National Guidelines. Clinical insights are
supported by rationale and student addresses all assignment
criterion.
13 pts
Needs Improvement
Little to no clinical application treatment plan and analysis of
the following for summary: however guidelines only generally

discussed without reflection on actual treatment decisions that
should have been made. The final analysis section missi ng at
least one: *Pathophysiology and Pharmacology analysis
*Additional analysis of the case as noted above *Follow -up
*Quality Analysis *Coding and Billing using original dialogue
i.e., no direct quotes. Diagnostic testing recommendedoes not
follow National Guidelines. Student missing more than one
portion of analysis.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Post contributes no clinically accurate perspectives/insights
applicable to clinical content area/identified chief complaint
presentation in original dialogue (no direct quotes) related to
assigned Mental Health Diagnosis: OR **Analysis is missing
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence Based
Resources
Discussion post fully supported by evidence from appropriate
sources published within the last five years including National
Guidelines. Content of journal articles represents a logical link
between the article content and the assigned topics/case study
information. In-text citations and complete references are
provided.
10 pts
Excellent
Discussion post fully supported by evidence from appropriate
sources published within the last five years including National
Guidelines. Content of journal articles represents a logical link
between the article content and the assigned topics/case study
information. In-text citations and complete references are
provided.
9 pts
V. Good
Discussion post is partially supported by evidence from
appropriate sources published within the last five years. In-text

citations and complete references are provided. Evidence-based
reference(s) used but may not fully demonstrate National
guidelines or fully support treatment recommendations.
8 pts
Satisfactory
Discussion post is supported by evidence from appropriate
resources however National Guidelines are not referenced in
regard to diagnostic testing and treatment planning OR Journal
articles do not represent logical link between the article content
and assigned topics/ case study.
5 pts
Needs Improvement
Discussion post not fully supported by evidence from
appropriate sources published within the last five years OR does
not include National Guidelines AND Content of journal articles
does not represents a logical link between the article content
and the assigned topics/case study information. In-text citations
and complete references are provided.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Discussion post is not supported by evidence from appropriate
sources published within the last five years. National Guidelines
are not used to support post. References and in-text citations
may be incomplete.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion
Format Possible Points = 5 Points
Organization & APA
understandable sequence. Headings reflect separation of
criterion outlined in assignment guidelines AND there are
minimal spelling or grammatical errors.

(*) APA style references and in text citations are required;
however, there are no deductions for errors in indentation or
spacing of references. All elements of the reference otherwi se
must be included.
5 pts
Excellent
understandable sequence. Organization of topics and transitions
among ideas lends clarity to the discussion. Headings and
paragraph spacing are used logically and contribute to evidence
of the assigned disease. Zero errors in grammar/spelling. Strong
ability to communicate thoughts and ideas concisely.
4 pts
V. Good
understandable sequence, However minimal transitions,
headings and spacing used to organize thoughts. Zero to 2 errors
in grammar/spelling but no effect on ability to communicate
thoughts and ideas.
3 pts
Satisfactory
May be unclear or difficult to follow in places. Headings,
paragraphs and spacing. 3-6 errors in grammar/spelling with no
effect on ability to communicate thoughts and ideas.
2 pts
Needs Improvement
May be unclear or difficult to follow in places. Weak linkage to

assigned mental health topic. >6 errors in grammar/spelling
which contributes somewhat to effectiveness of ability to
communicate thoughts and ideas.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Discussion topics not linked through organization of thoughts,
paragraph, spacing or headings. Lack of organization
contributes to lack of understanding of thought process. Errors
in grammar contribute to a fundamental lack of understanding
of information presented.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParticipation
Discussion late penalty deductions
A 10% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after
the deadline on Wednesday 1159PM MT of Week 6, regardless
of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after
11:59pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic
0)
0 pts
Minus Points
0 pts
Minus Points
0 pts
Total Points: 40

112921, 349 PM Preview Rubric 4.27.2 Article (100 points)

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to 112921, 349 PM Preview Rubric 4.27.2 Article (100 points)

Similar to 112921, 349 PM Preview Rubric 4.27.2 Article (100 points) (7)

More from SantosConleyha

More from SantosConleyha (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

112921, 349 PM Preview Rubric 4.27.2 Article (100 points)