1 Final Assessment Point - Guidelines for the Case Study Module title: Inclusive Pedagogy and Evidencing Impact on Learners Assessment task: Case Study Word count limit: 4,500 words Submission deadline: Please consult the VLE. Submission procedure: Please submit via the submission link on the VLE. Extenuating circumstances If you are experiencing unforeseen personal circumstances that are affecting your ability to submit within the stipulated deadlines, you are required to communicate these issues to the Unicaf Extenuating Circumstances team in the first instance, via [email protected], for further information on how to make a personal circumstances application for consideration. Personal circumstances requests may usually only be made within 5 working days of the original deadline unless valid justification, along with appropriate evidence, exists to show that you could not have reasonably communicated the issues any earlier. It is important to keep in mind that if the claim is not upheld and you have not submitted by the deadline, the module shall be failed as a result of no submission of the summative assessment. Academic misconduct including plagiarism ……… ………. ………. By submitting your work you acknowledge that you have read and agree with the above statements. mailto:[email protected] mailto:[email protected] 2 General Guidance Your assignment should be word processed (handwritten assignments are not accepted), using time new roman size 12 font, double spaced, with numbered pages and your student number printed as a footer on every page. The word limits stated for this assignment excludes the reference list at the end of the assignment but includes all text in the main body of the assignment (including direct quotations, in-text citations, footnotes, tables, diagrams and graphs). Please be aware that exceeding the word count limit will affect the academic judgement of the piece of work and may result in the award of a lower mark. Appendices are not considered a supplement, and thus, will not be assessed as part of the content of the assignment. As such, they will not contribute to the grade awarded, however it may be appropriate to use an Appendices section for any material which is a useful reference for the reader. Please note that appendices are not included in the word count. The majority of references should come from primary sources (e.g., journal articles, conference papers, reports, etc.) although you can also utilise area specific textbooks. You must ensure that you use the Harvard style of referencing. Please indicate the word count length at the end of your assignment. Please note that you are required to submit an extended literature review project where you will critically evaluate scholarly articles and books in order to answer specific research questions. NO STUDENT WILL BE ALLOWED TO COLLECT ANY .

1. 1
Final Assessment Point - Guidelines for the Case Study
Module title: Inclusive Pedagogy and Evidencing Impact on
Learners
Assessment task: Case Study
Word count limit: 4,500 words
Submission deadline: Please consult the VLE.
Submission procedure: Please submit via the submission link on
the VLE.
Extenuating circumstances
If you are experiencing unforeseen personal circumstances that
are affecting your ability to
submit within the stipulated deadlines, you are required to

2. communicate these issues to the
Unicaf Extenuating Circumstances team in the first instance, via
[email protected], for further information on how to make a
personal
circumstances application for consideration.
Personal circumstances requests may usually only be made
within 5 working days of the
original deadline unless valid justification, along with
appropriate evidence, exists to show
that you could not have reasonably communicated the issues any
earlier. It is
important to keep in mind that if the claim is not upheld and
you have not submitted by the
deadline, the module shall be failed as a result of no submission
of the summative
assessment.
Academic misconduct including plagiarism
………
……….
……….
By submitting your work you acknowledge that you have read

3. and agree
with the above statements.
mailto:[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]
2
General Guidance
Your assignment should be word processed (handwritten
assignments are not accepted),
using time new roman size 12 font, double spaced, with
numbered pages and your student
number printed as a footer on every page.
The word limits stated for this assignment excludes the
reference list at the end of the
assignment but includes all text in the main body of the
assignment (including direct
quotations, in-text citations, footnotes, tables, diagrams and
graphs).
Please be aware that exceeding the word count limit will affect
the academic judgement of
the piece of work and may result in the award of a lower mark.

4. Appendices are not considered a supplement, and thus, will not
be assessed as part of the
content of the assignment. As such, they will not contribute to
the grade awarded, however
it may be appropriate to use an Appendices section for any
material which is a useful reference
for the reader. Please note that appendices are not included in
the word count.
The majority of references should come from primary sources
(e.g., journal articles,
conference papers, reports, etc.) although you can also utilise
area specific textbooks. You
must ensure that you use the Harvard style of referencing.
Please indicate the word count length at the end of your
assignment.
Please note that you are required to submit an extended
literature review project where you
will critically evaluate scholarly articles and books in order to
answer specific research
questions.
NO STUDENT WILL BE ALLOWED TO COLLECT ANY
PRIMARY DATA

5. Marking and assessment
Your final summative assessment weighs 100% of your final
grade.
Learning outcomes assessed in this assessment
1. Distinguish between, and evaluate, different perspectives and
proposed responses to
educational and social problems/issues that can affect learning
and progression
2. Critically evaluate notions of transformative learning and
how these may relate to
principles of social justice
3. Interpret and critically appraise own resourcefulness and
application of professional
curiosity and inquiry to enable inclusive pedagogy for teacher
development and practice
4. Develop, implement and evaluate strategies to support
positive educational experiences
and outcomes for all learners
Learning Outcomes (Los) are your ‘Touchstones’ in terms of
reflecting on your existing

6. knowledge and continuous learning. Need to demonstrate how
you meet these LOs in the Module
Assessment.
3
Assessment Guidelines
Develop a personal Case Study of an inclusive intervention,
contextualised in a critique of
theories and concepts related to transformative learning and
social justice.
Structure of the Case Study
Your work should include and cover the following
sections/aspects and content (as shown
and stated in the table below). The specific percentage marks
allocated to each section/aspect
of your work is stated below. Please also note that the Level 7
marking criteria (located
towards the end of this assessment brief) will also be used to
reflect this overall grade. Please
remember that achievement and demonstration of both learning
outcomes (1 - 4) is being

7. assessed in this assessment.
Summative assessment criteria for the CASE STUDY
Available
marks
Criteria
Explanation of Criteria
100/100
Introduction and rationale Introduce what the assignment’s
focus will
be
Give some background here on your first
thoughts.
Provide the context and the rationale of your
literature review and possible debates around this
research area.

8. 10
Aims and objectives Explain the aims and objectives of the
study.
10
Methodology
Explain your search strategy (How did you go
about this? Books? Journals? Databases etc.?) –
ensure the validity and reliability of the research
studies you included in your text.
Examples contextualized and evaluated in
contemporary theories and research in the field.
15
Findings of the Literature
Review/Learning Outcomes
What does the literature tell you in relation to
your personal inclusive intervention?

9. Do the findings of transformative learning and
social justice reflect your intervention?
30
Conclusions and Implications Try to summarize your work and
discuss your
implications and recommendations.
This section should not include any new
material.
20
Presentation criteria Cover Page, Table of Contents, Page
numbering,
Margins, Line spacing, Appendices (if it is
necessary),
Font consistency, Separation of paragraphs.
10
Harvard referencing Citations and reference list according to
the
Harvard referencing guide.
5

10. 4
Marking Criteria
Mark
range
Performance
characteristic
Grading criteria
90-100 Exceptional
Pass
positions in the analysis of
key issues in the subject area
-ranging emphasis on knowledge and ideas that are at
the forefront of the
discipline

11. evidence-base
curate and relevant
-presented and organised in an appropriate academic
style.
80-89 Outstanding
Pass
Excellent attainment of all learning outcomes, with some met
to an exemplary standard
positions in the analysis of
key issues in the subject area. Wide-ranging emphasis on
knowledge and ideas that are
at the forefront of the discipline
literature and evidence-
base
riting is refined

12. -presented and organised in an appropriate academic
style.
70-79 Excellent
pass
s of varied theoretical
positions in the analysis of key
issues in the subject area
forefront of the discipline
-base
te and relevant
elements
-presented and organised in an appropriate academic
style.
60-69 Good Pass
positions in the analysis of key
issues in the subject area

13. forefront of the discipline
-base that
develops from
recommended readings
specified referencing system
-presented and organised in an appropriate academic
style.
50-59 Pass
theoretical positions in the
analysis of key issues in the subject area
forefront of the discipline
-base,
but little consideration
beyond recommended readings
ial covered is mostly accurate and relevant
sophisticated phrasing

14. ll-presented and organised in an appropriate academic
style.
5
40-49 Needs some
improvement
in the analysis of key issues
in the subject area
at the forefront of the
discipline
-base, but
restricted to
recommended readings
als that suggest
confusion and misunderstanding

15. difficult to understand
simplistic
ed referencing system,
but meets key principles
-presented and organised in an appropriate academic
style.
30-39 Needs major
improvement
tical
positions in the analysis of key
issues in the subject area
forefront of the discipline
-base, with
inadequate use of
recommended reading and no exploration outside that
in a three page (minimum) essay, identify a consumer product
that interests you, research online the manufacturing process,
and describe in some detail the following:
· The product(s) and the company identified with this product.
· What factors do you perceive were critical in identifying
where to locate the manufacturing operation for this product?

16. · What type of operation layout best suits the kind of
manufacturing required for this product?
· What factors are essential to maintain an efficient, cost-
effective, and sustainable production operation?
USE TESLA AND USA BASED REFRENCES**