10/4/21, 7:36 AM Rubric Assessment - MHC6306-Human Resource Management in Healthcare Organizations SU01 - South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=81520&evalObjectId=415122&evalObjectType=1&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=251905&… 1/3
Associated Learning Objectives
MHC6306.01 HR function related to strategic planning
Assessment Method: Score on Criteria - IMPORTANCE OF IDENTIFIED ROLES: Describe and assess the importance of each role and how it relates to the organization
Required Performance: Satisfactory (C range) (21-23)
MHC6306.03 Job analysis
Assessment Method: Score on Criteria - IMPORTANCE OF IDENTIFIED ROLES: Describe and assess the importance of each role and how it relates to the organization
Required Performance: Satisfactory (C range) (21-23)
Close
Print RubricMHC6306 Week 3 Project Rubric
Course: MHC6306-Human Resource Management in Healthcare Organizations SU01
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through
D range) (1–17)
1 point
Satisfactory (C range)
(18-19)
19 points
Proficient (B range)
(20 - 22)
22 points
Exemplary (A range)
(23-25)
25 points
Criterion Score
EDUCATIONAL
QUALIFICATIONS
: Explain the
education
qualifications
needed for each
position/ role
/ 25
CREDENTIALING
AND LICENSING:
Outline the
requirements for
the identified roles
/ 25
Student did not
submit assignment.
Student attempted to
explain the
educational
qualifications of the
positions, but did not
provide sufficient
understanding in the
explanation
Student explained the
educational
qualifications of each
position using two to
three resources
Student explained the
educational
qualifications for
each position using
two to three scholarly
resources
Student explained the
educational
qualifications for
each position using
three to five scholarly
resources
Student did not
submit assignment.
Student attempted to
outline the
requirements for
licensing and
credentialing for the
positions but did not
demonstrate
sufficient
understanding
Student outlined the
requirements for
licensing and
credentialing using
two to three
resources
Student outlined the
requirements for
licensing and
credentialing using
two to three scholarly
resources
Student outlined the
requirements for
licensing and
credentialing using
three to five scholarly
resources
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through
D range) (1–20)
20 points
Satisfactory (C range)
(21-23)
23 points
Proficient (B range)
(24-26)
26 points
Exemplary (A range)
(27-30)
30 points
Criterion Score
IMPORTANCE OF
IDENTIFIED
ROLES: Describe
and assess the
importance of
each role and how
it relates to the
organization
/ 30
Student did not
submit assignment.
Student attempted to
describe and assess
the importance of
each role but did not
demonstrate
sufficient
understanding
Student described
and assessed each
role using two to
t ...
112221, 826 PM Rubric Assessment - MHA6999-Seminar in HealtSantosConleyha
11/22/21, 8:26 PM Rubric Assessment - MHA6999-Seminar in Healthcare Cases SU01 - South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=83314&evalObjectId=426189&evalObjectType=1&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=260758&… 1/3
Close
Print RubricSU MHA6999 Week 5 Project Rubric
Course: MHA6999-Seminar in Healthcare Cases SU01
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through
D Range) (1–51)
51 points
Satisfactory (C
Range) (52–59)
59 points
Proficient (B Range)
(60–66)
66 points
Exemplary (A
Range) (67–75)
75 points
Criterion Score
Includes all
assignment
components and
meets graduate
level critical
thinking. A
purpose
statement is
identified for the
response.
/ 75
Student did not
submit assignment.
Work minimally
meets assignment
expectations. No
purpose statement
is provided.
Assignment meets
some expectations
with minimal depth
and breath. Purpose
statement is vague.
Assignment meets
most of
expectations with all
components being
addressed in good
depth and breadth.
Purpose statement
is present and
appropriate for the
assignment.
Assignment meets
all expectations with
exceptional depth
and breath. A
comprehensive
purpose statement
delineates all
requirements of the
assignment.
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through
D Range) (1–51)
51 points
Satisfactory (C
Range) (52–59)
59 points
Proficient (B Range)
(60–66)
66 points
Exemplary (A
Range) (67–75)
75 points
Criterion Score
Integrates and
understands
assignments
concepts and
topics.
/ 75
Student did not
submit assignment.
Shows some degree
of understanding of
assignment
concepts.
Demonstrates a
clear understanding
of assignment
concepts.
Demonstrates the
ability to evaluate
and apply key
assignment
concepts.
Demonstrates the
ability to evaluate,
apply and integrate
key assignment
concepts.
11/22/21, 8:26 PM Rubric Assessment - MHA6999-Seminar in Healthcare Cases SU01 - South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=83314&evalObjectId=426189&evalObjectType=1&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=260758&… 2/3
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through
D Range) (1–51)
51 points
Satisfactory (C
Range) (52–59)
59 points
Proficient (B Range)
(60–66)
66 points
Exemplary (A
Range) (67–75)
75 points
Criterion ScoreCriteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through
D Range) (1–51)
51 points
Satisfactory (C
Range) (52–59)
59 points
Proficient (B Range)
(60–66)
66 points
Exemplary (A
Range) (67–75)
75 points
Criterion Score
Synthesizes,
analyses, and
evaluates
resources to
apply concepts
in the
assignment.
/ 75
Student did not
submit assignment.
Does not interpret,
apply, and
synthesize concepts
and strategies.
Summarizes
information gleaned
from sources to
support major
points, but does not
synthesize. Provides
minimal justification
to sup ...
112221, 826 PM Rubric Assessment - MHA6999-Seminar in HealtBenitoSumpter862
11/22/21, 8:26 PM Rubric Assessment - MHA6999-Seminar in Healthcare Cases SU01 - South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=83314&evalObjectId=426189&evalObjectType=1&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=260758&… 1/3
Close
Print RubricSU MHA6999 Week 5 Project Rubric
Course: MHA6999-Seminar in Healthcare Cases SU01
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through
D Range) (1–51)
51 points
Satisfactory (C
Range) (52–59)
59 points
Proficient (B Range)
(60–66)
66 points
Exemplary (A
Range) (67–75)
75 points
Criterion Score
Includes all
assignment
components and
meets graduate
level critical
thinking. A
purpose
statement is
identified for the
response.
/ 75
Student did not
submit assignment.
Work minimally
meets assignment
expectations. No
purpose statement
is provided.
Assignment meets
some expectations
with minimal depth
and breath. Purpose
statement is vague.
Assignment meets
most of
expectations with all
components being
addressed in good
depth and breadth.
Purpose statement
is present and
appropriate for the
assignment.
Assignment meets
all expectations with
exceptional depth
and breath. A
comprehensive
purpose statement
delineates all
requirements of the
assignment.
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through
D Range) (1–51)
51 points
Satisfactory (C
Range) (52–59)
59 points
Proficient (B Range)
(60–66)
66 points
Exemplary (A
Range) (67–75)
75 points
Criterion Score
Integrates and
understands
assignments
concepts and
topics.
/ 75
Student did not
submit assignment.
Shows some degree
of understanding of
assignment
concepts.
Demonstrates a
clear understanding
of assignment
concepts.
Demonstrates the
ability to evaluate
and apply key
assignment
concepts.
Demonstrates the
ability to evaluate,
apply and integrate
key assignment
concepts.
11/22/21, 8:26 PM Rubric Assessment - MHA6999-Seminar in Healthcare Cases SU01 - South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=83314&evalObjectId=426189&evalObjectType=1&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=260758&… 2/3
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through
D Range) (1–51)
51 points
Satisfactory (C
Range) (52–59)
59 points
Proficient (B Range)
(60–66)
66 points
Exemplary (A
Range) (67–75)
75 points
Criterion ScoreCriteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through
D Range) (1–51)
51 points
Satisfactory (C
Range) (52–59)
59 points
Proficient (B Range)
(60–66)
66 points
Exemplary (A
Range) (67–75)
75 points
Criterion Score
Synthesizes,
analyses, and
evaluates
resources to
apply concepts
in the
assignment.
/ 75
Student did not
submit assignment.
Does not interpret,
apply, and
synthesize concepts
and strategies.
Summarizes
information gleaned
from sources to
support major
points, but does not
synthesize. Provides
minimal justification
to sup ...
10/18/21, 7:22 PM Rubric Assessment - MHC6306-Human Resource Management in Healthcare Organizations SU01 - South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=81520&evalObjectId=415124&evalObjectType=1&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=251906&… 1/3
Close
Print RubricMHC6306 Week 5 Project Rubric
Course: MHC6306-Human Resource Management in Healthcare Organizations SU01
Criteria
No Evidence
0 points
Unsatisfactory
51 points
Satisfactory
59 points
Proficient
66 points
Exemplary
75 points
Criterion Score
Includes all
assignment
components and
meets graduate
level critical
thinking. A
purpose
statement is
identified for the
response.
/ 75
Integrates and
understands
assignments
concepts and
topics.
/ 75
Student did not
submit assignment
Work minimally
meets assignment
expectations. No
purpose statement
is provided.
Assignment meets
some expectations
with minimal depth
and breath. Purpose
statement is vague.
Assignment meets
most of
expectations with all
components being
addressed in good
depth and breadth.
Purpose statement
is present and
appropriate for the
assignment.
Assignment meets
all expectations with
exceptional depth
and breath. A
comprehensive
purpose statement
delineates all
requirements of the
assignment.
Student did not
submit assignment
Shows some degree
of understanding of
assignment
concepts.
Demonstrates a
clear understanding
of assignment
concepts.
Demonstrates the
ability to evaluate
and apply key
assignment
concepts.
Demonstrates the
ability to evaluate,
apply and integrate
key assignment
concepts.
10/18/21, 7:22 PM Rubric Assessment - MHC6306-Human Resource Management in Healthcare Organizations SU01 - South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=81520&evalObjectId=415124&evalObjectType=1&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=251906&… 2/3
Total / 250
Criteria
No Evidence
0 points
Unsatisfactory
51 points
Satisfactory
59 points
Proficient
66 points
Exemplary
75 points
Criterion Score
Synthesizes,
analyses, and
evaluates
resources to
apply concepts
in the
assignment.
/ 75
Student did not
submit assignment
Does not interpret,
apply, and
synthesize concepts,
and/or strategies.
Summarizes
information gleaned
from sources to
support major
points, but does not
synthesize. Provides
minimal justification
to support major
topics. Uses 1
credible resource in
the assignment.
Synthesizes and
justifies (defends,
explains, validates,
confirms)
information gleaned
from sources to
support major
points presented.
Uses a minimum of
2 credible resources
in the assignment.
Synthesizes and
justifies (defends,
explains, validates,
confirms)
information gleaned
from sources to
support major
points presented.
Uses 3 credible
resources for the
assignment,
including at least 1
scholarly pe ...
10/18/21, 7:22 PM Rubric Assessment - MHC6306-Human Resource Management in Healthcare Organizations SU01 - South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=81520&evalObjectId=415124&evalObjectType=1&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=251906&… 1/3
Close
Print RubricMHC6306 Week 5 Project Rubric
Course: MHC6306-Human Resource Management in Healthcare Organizations SU01
Criteria
No Evidence
0 points
Unsatisfactory
51 points
Satisfactory
59 points
Proficient
66 points
Exemplary
75 points
Criterion Score
Includes all
assignment
components and
meets graduate
level critical
thinking. A
purpose
statement is
identified for the
response.
/ 75
Integrates and
understands
assignments
concepts and
topics.
/ 75
Student did not
submit assignment
Work minimally
meets assignment
expectations. No
purpose statement
is provided.
Assignment meets
some expectations
with minimal depth
and breath. Purpose
statement is vague.
Assignment meets
most of
expectations with all
components being
addressed in good
depth and breadth.
Purpose statement
is present and
appropriate for the
assignment.
Assignment meets
all expectations with
exceptional depth
and breath. A
comprehensive
purpose statement
delineates all
requirements of the
assignment.
Student did not
submit assignment
Shows some degree
of understanding of
assignment
concepts.
Demonstrates a
clear understanding
of assignment
concepts.
Demonstrates the
ability to evaluate
and apply key
assignment
concepts.
Demonstrates the
ability to evaluate,
apply and integrate
key assignment
concepts.
10/18/21, 7:22 PM Rubric Assessment - MHC6306-Human Resource Management in Healthcare Organizations SU01 - South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=81520&evalObjectId=415124&evalObjectType=1&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=251906&… 2/3
Total / 250
Criteria
No Evidence
0 points
Unsatisfactory
51 points
Satisfactory
59 points
Proficient
66 points
Exemplary
75 points
Criterion Score
Synthesizes,
analyses, and
evaluates
resources to
apply concepts
in the
assignment.
/ 75
Student did not
submit assignment
Does not interpret,
apply, and
synthesize concepts,
and/or strategies.
Summarizes
information gleaned
from sources to
support major
points, but does not
synthesize. Provides
minimal justification
to support major
topics. Uses 1
credible resource in
the assignment.
Synthesizes and
justifies (defends,
explains, validates,
confirms)
information gleaned
from sources to
support major
points presented.
Uses a minimum of
2 credible resources
in the assignment.
Synthesizes and
justifies (defends,
explains, validates,
confirms)
information gleaned
from sources to
support major
points presented.
Uses 3 credible
resources for the
assignment,
including at least 1
scholarly pe ...
MAT-130 Homework 3 Name:_________________________________
Due Friday, April 2, 2021, no later than 4:45 P.M.
Decide whether each statement is true or false. (1 point each)
1. If ¬(𝑝 ∧ 𝑞) is true, then the truth values of p and q must be both true.
2. p → q is equivalent to ¬ 𝑝 ∨ 𝑞 .
Decide whether each is a statement or is not a statement. Note: a compound statement is still a statement.
(1 point each)
3. 12 − 24 ≤ 12
4. I command you to drive to Houston, Texas.
Write a negation of the following without using a slash symbol. (1 point each)
5. z > −28
6. 𝑧 − 2 ≤ −37
Construct a truth table for the following compound statement. (4 points)
Please show all columns, just as in the class notes.
7. 𝑞 → ¬𝑝 → 𝑞
3/30/2021 Rubric Assessment - MHA6100-Executive Leadership in Healthcare Organizations SU01 - South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=75828&evalObjectId=377969&evalObjectType=1&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=226982&… 1/2
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F
through D
Range) (1–10)
10 points
Satisfactory (C
Range)
11 points
Proficient (B Range)
(12–13)
13 points
Exemplary (A Range)
(14–15)
15 points
Criterion
Score
Includes all
assignment
components and
meets graduate level
critical thinking. A
purpose statement is
identified for the
response.
/ 15Student did not
submit
assignment.
Work minimally
meets
assignment
expectations. No
purpose
statement is
provided.
Assignment
meets some
expectations
with minimal
depth and
breath. Purpose
statement is
vague.
Assignment meets most
of expectations with all
components being
addressed in good
depth and breadth.
Purpose statement is
present and appropriate
for the assignment.
Assignment meets all
expectations with
exceptional depth
and breath. A
comprehensive
purpose statement
delineates all
requirements of the
assignment.
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F
through D Range)
(1–10)
10 points
Satisfactory (C
Range)
11 points
Proficient (B Range)
(12–13)
13 points
Exemplary (A Range)
(14–15)
15 points
Criterion
Score
Integrates and
understands
assignments
concepts and
topics.
/ 15Student did not
submit
assignment.
Shows some
degree of
understanding of
assignment
concepts.
Demonstrates a
clear
understanding of
assignment
concepts.
Demonstrates the
ability to evaluate
and apply key
assignment concepts.
Demonstrates the
ability to evaluate, apply
and integrate key
assignment concepts.
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F
through D
Range) (1–10)
10 points
Satisfactory (C Range)
11 points
Proficient (B Range)
(12–13)
13 points
Exemplary (A Range) (14–
15)
15 points
Criterion
Score
Synthesizes,
analyses,
and
evaluates
/ 15Student did not
submit
assignment.
Does not
interpret, apply,
and synthesize
Summarizes
informa
MAT-130 Homework 3 Name:_________________________________
Due Friday, April 2, 2021, no later than 4:45 P.M.
Decide whether each statement is true or false. (1 point each)
1. If ¬(𝑝 ∧ 𝑞) is true, then the truth values of p and q must be both true.
2. p → q is equivalent to ¬ 𝑝 ∨ 𝑞 .
Decide whether each is a statement or is not a statement. Note: a compound statement is still a statement.
(1 point each)
3. 12 − 24 ≤ 12
4. I command you to drive to Houston, Texas.
Write a negation of the following without using a slash symbol. (1 point each)
5. z > −28
6. 𝑧 − 2 ≤ −37
Construct a truth table for the following compound statement. (4 points)
Please show all columns, just as in the class notes.
7. 𝑞 → ¬𝑝 → 𝑞
3/30/2021 Rubric Assessment - MHA6100-Executive Leadership in Healthcare Organizations SU01 - South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=75828&evalObjectId=377969&evalObjectType=1&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=226982&… 1/2
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F
through D
Range) (1–10)
10 points
Satisfactory (C
Range)
11 points
Proficient (B Range)
(12–13)
13 points
Exemplary (A Range)
(14–15)
15 points
Criterion
Score
Includes all
assignment
components and
meets graduate level
critical thinking. A
purpose statement is
identified for the
response.
/ 15Student did not
submit
assignment.
Work minimally
meets
assignment
expectations. No
purpose
statement is
provided.
Assignment
meets some
expectations
with minimal
depth and
breath. Purpose
statement is
vague.
Assignment meets most
of expectations with all
components being
addressed in good
depth and breadth.
Purpose statement is
present and appropriate
for the assignment.
Assignment meets all
expectations with
exceptional depth
and breath. A
comprehensive
purpose statement
delineates all
requirements of the
assignment.
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F
through D Range)
(1–10)
10 points
Satisfactory (C
Range)
11 points
Proficient (B Range)
(12–13)
13 points
Exemplary (A Range)
(14–15)
15 points
Criterion
Score
Integrates and
understands
assignments
concepts and
topics.
/ 15Student did not
submit
assignment.
Shows some
degree of
understanding of
assignment
concepts.
Demonstrates a
clear
understanding of
assignment
concepts.
Demonstrates the
ability to evaluate
and apply key
assignment concepts.
Demonstrates the
ability to evaluate, apply
and integrate key
assignment concepts.
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F
through D
Range) (1–10)
10 points
Satisfactory (C Range)
11 points
Proficient (B Range)
(12–13)
13 points
Exemplary (A Range) (14–
15)
15 points
Criterion
Score
Synthesizes,
analyses,
and
evaluates
/ 15Student did not
submit
assignment.
Does not
interpret, apply,
and synthesize
Summarizes
informa
111421, 1033 AM Rubric Assessment - PSY2061-Research MethodSantosConleyha
11/14/21, 10:33 AM Rubric Assessment - PSY2061-Research Methods Lab SU01 - South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=82596&evalObjectId=420953&evalObjectType… 1/4
PSY2061 Week 7 Midweek Assignment Rubric
Course: PSY2061-Research Methods Lab SU01
Criteria
No
Submission
0 points
Emerging (F
through D
Range) (9-10)
10 points
Satisfactory (C
Range) (11-12)
12 points
Proficient (B
Range) (12-13)
13 points
Exemplary (A
Range) (14-15)
15 points
Criterion
Score
Fulfillment
of
Assignment
Expectation
s
/ 15
Student did
not submit
assignment
Submission
does not meet
assignment
expectations.
It does not
address all
parts of the
assignment.
Submission
relies on
unsupported
claims (e.g.,
personal
conjecture,
judging
assertions
without
backing
evidence).
Submission
includes
excessive use
of direct
quotations.
Submission
does not
clearly
demonstrate
critical
thinking,
synthesis of
information, or
application of
research and
course
material.
Submission
meets most
assignment
expectations.
It addresses all
parts of the
assignment,
though some
parts may be
more fully
developed
than others.
While
submission
may include
some
unsupported
claims (e.g.,
personal
conjecture,
judging
assertions),
there are also
informed and
validated
conclusions
throughout,
supported
with cited
evidence.
Submission
may have a
few direct
quotations.
However,
there is at
least an
Submission
meets all
assignment
expectations
and addresses
all parts of the
assignment.
Submission
includes
almost no
unsupported
claims (e.g.,
personal
conjecture,
judging
assertions);
rather, most of
the submission
has informed
and validated
conclusions
supported
with cited
evidence.
Submission
has no direct
quotations, or
a couple of
quotes may be
used, but they
are explained
and analyzed
in detail to
demonstrate
understanding
of the content.
The required
Submission
meets all
assignment
expectations
and addresses
all parts of the
assignment.
Submission
includes no
unsupported
claims (e.g.,
personal
conjecture,
judging
assertions).
Rather, the
submission
has informed
and validated
conclusions
that
demonstrate
both breadth
and depth of
information
and are
supported by
evidence from
cited sources.
Submission is
completely
original to the
writer, yet
gives credit to
material that
informed the
student on the
11/14/21, 10:33 AM Rubric Assessment - PSY2061-Research Methods Lab SU01 - South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=82596&evalObjectId=420953&evalObjectType… 2/4
Criteria
No
Submission
0 points
Emerging (F
through D
Range) (9-10)
10 points
Satisfactory (C
Range) (11-12)
12 points
Proficient (B
Range) (12-13)
13 points
Exemplary (A
Range) (14-15)
15 points
Criterion
Score
attempt at
explaini ...
111421, 1033 AM Rubric Assessment - PSY2061-Research MethodBenitoSumpter862
11/14/21, 10:33 AM Rubric Assessment - PSY2061-Research Methods Lab SU01 - South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=82596&evalObjectId=420953&evalObjectType… 1/4
PSY2061 Week 7 Midweek Assignment Rubric
Course: PSY2061-Research Methods Lab SU01
Criteria
No
Submission
0 points
Emerging (F
through D
Range) (9-10)
10 points
Satisfactory (C
Range) (11-12)
12 points
Proficient (B
Range) (12-13)
13 points
Exemplary (A
Range) (14-15)
15 points
Criterion
Score
Fulfillment
of
Assignment
Expectation
s
/ 15
Student did
not submit
assignment
Submission
does not meet
assignment
expectations.
It does not
address all
parts of the
assignment.
Submission
relies on
unsupported
claims (e.g.,
personal
conjecture,
judging
assertions
without
backing
evidence).
Submission
includes
excessive use
of direct
quotations.
Submission
does not
clearly
demonstrate
critical
thinking,
synthesis of
information, or
application of
research and
course
material.
Submission
meets most
assignment
expectations.
It addresses all
parts of the
assignment,
though some
parts may be
more fully
developed
than others.
While
submission
may include
some
unsupported
claims (e.g.,
personal
conjecture,
judging
assertions),
there are also
informed and
validated
conclusions
throughout,
supported
with cited
evidence.
Submission
may have a
few direct
quotations.
However,
there is at
least an
Submission
meets all
assignment
expectations
and addresses
all parts of the
assignment.
Submission
includes
almost no
unsupported
claims (e.g.,
personal
conjecture,
judging
assertions);
rather, most of
the submission
has informed
and validated
conclusions
supported
with cited
evidence.
Submission
has no direct
quotations, or
a couple of
quotes may be
used, but they
are explained
and analyzed
in detail to
demonstrate
understanding
of the content.
The required
Submission
meets all
assignment
expectations
and addresses
all parts of the
assignment.
Submission
includes no
unsupported
claims (e.g.,
personal
conjecture,
judging
assertions).
Rather, the
submission
has informed
and validated
conclusions
that
demonstrate
both breadth
and depth of
information
and are
supported by
evidence from
cited sources.
Submission is
completely
original to the
writer, yet
gives credit to
material that
informed the
student on the
11/14/21, 10:33 AM Rubric Assessment - PSY2061-Research Methods Lab SU01 - South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=82596&evalObjectId=420953&evalObjectType… 2/4
Criteria
No
Submission
0 points
Emerging (F
through D
Range) (9-10)
10 points
Satisfactory (C
Range) (11-12)
12 points
Proficient (B
Range) (12-13)
13 points
Exemplary (A
Range) (14-15)
15 points
Criterion
Score
attempt at
explaini ...
112221, 826 PM Rubric Assessment - MHA6999-Seminar in HealtSantosConleyha
11/22/21, 8:26 PM Rubric Assessment - MHA6999-Seminar in Healthcare Cases SU01 - South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=83314&evalObjectId=426189&evalObjectType=1&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=260758&… 1/3
Close
Print RubricSU MHA6999 Week 5 Project Rubric
Course: MHA6999-Seminar in Healthcare Cases SU01
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through
D Range) (1–51)
51 points
Satisfactory (C
Range) (52–59)
59 points
Proficient (B Range)
(60–66)
66 points
Exemplary (A
Range) (67–75)
75 points
Criterion Score
Includes all
assignment
components and
meets graduate
level critical
thinking. A
purpose
statement is
identified for the
response.
/ 75
Student did not
submit assignment.
Work minimally
meets assignment
expectations. No
purpose statement
is provided.
Assignment meets
some expectations
with minimal depth
and breath. Purpose
statement is vague.
Assignment meets
most of
expectations with all
components being
addressed in good
depth and breadth.
Purpose statement
is present and
appropriate for the
assignment.
Assignment meets
all expectations with
exceptional depth
and breath. A
comprehensive
purpose statement
delineates all
requirements of the
assignment.
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through
D Range) (1–51)
51 points
Satisfactory (C
Range) (52–59)
59 points
Proficient (B Range)
(60–66)
66 points
Exemplary (A
Range) (67–75)
75 points
Criterion Score
Integrates and
understands
assignments
concepts and
topics.
/ 75
Student did not
submit assignment.
Shows some degree
of understanding of
assignment
concepts.
Demonstrates a
clear understanding
of assignment
concepts.
Demonstrates the
ability to evaluate
and apply key
assignment
concepts.
Demonstrates the
ability to evaluate,
apply and integrate
key assignment
concepts.
11/22/21, 8:26 PM Rubric Assessment - MHA6999-Seminar in Healthcare Cases SU01 - South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=83314&evalObjectId=426189&evalObjectType=1&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=260758&… 2/3
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through
D Range) (1–51)
51 points
Satisfactory (C
Range) (52–59)
59 points
Proficient (B Range)
(60–66)
66 points
Exemplary (A
Range) (67–75)
75 points
Criterion ScoreCriteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through
D Range) (1–51)
51 points
Satisfactory (C
Range) (52–59)
59 points
Proficient (B Range)
(60–66)
66 points
Exemplary (A
Range) (67–75)
75 points
Criterion Score
Synthesizes,
analyses, and
evaluates
resources to
apply concepts
in the
assignment.
/ 75
Student did not
submit assignment.
Does not interpret,
apply, and
synthesize concepts
and strategies.
Summarizes
information gleaned
from sources to
support major
points, but does not
synthesize. Provides
minimal justification
to sup ...
112221, 826 PM Rubric Assessment - MHA6999-Seminar in HealtBenitoSumpter862
11/22/21, 8:26 PM Rubric Assessment - MHA6999-Seminar in Healthcare Cases SU01 - South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=83314&evalObjectId=426189&evalObjectType=1&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=260758&… 1/3
Close
Print RubricSU MHA6999 Week 5 Project Rubric
Course: MHA6999-Seminar in Healthcare Cases SU01
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through
D Range) (1–51)
51 points
Satisfactory (C
Range) (52–59)
59 points
Proficient (B Range)
(60–66)
66 points
Exemplary (A
Range) (67–75)
75 points
Criterion Score
Includes all
assignment
components and
meets graduate
level critical
thinking. A
purpose
statement is
identified for the
response.
/ 75
Student did not
submit assignment.
Work minimally
meets assignment
expectations. No
purpose statement
is provided.
Assignment meets
some expectations
with minimal depth
and breath. Purpose
statement is vague.
Assignment meets
most of
expectations with all
components being
addressed in good
depth and breadth.
Purpose statement
is present and
appropriate for the
assignment.
Assignment meets
all expectations with
exceptional depth
and breath. A
comprehensive
purpose statement
delineates all
requirements of the
assignment.
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through
D Range) (1–51)
51 points
Satisfactory (C
Range) (52–59)
59 points
Proficient (B Range)
(60–66)
66 points
Exemplary (A
Range) (67–75)
75 points
Criterion Score
Integrates and
understands
assignments
concepts and
topics.
/ 75
Student did not
submit assignment.
Shows some degree
of understanding of
assignment
concepts.
Demonstrates a
clear understanding
of assignment
concepts.
Demonstrates the
ability to evaluate
and apply key
assignment
concepts.
Demonstrates the
ability to evaluate,
apply and integrate
key assignment
concepts.
11/22/21, 8:26 PM Rubric Assessment - MHA6999-Seminar in Healthcare Cases SU01 - South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=83314&evalObjectId=426189&evalObjectType=1&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=260758&… 2/3
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through
D Range) (1–51)
51 points
Satisfactory (C
Range) (52–59)
59 points
Proficient (B Range)
(60–66)
66 points
Exemplary (A
Range) (67–75)
75 points
Criterion ScoreCriteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through
D Range) (1–51)
51 points
Satisfactory (C
Range) (52–59)
59 points
Proficient (B Range)
(60–66)
66 points
Exemplary (A
Range) (67–75)
75 points
Criterion Score
Synthesizes,
analyses, and
evaluates
resources to
apply concepts
in the
assignment.
/ 75
Student did not
submit assignment.
Does not interpret,
apply, and
synthesize concepts
and strategies.
Summarizes
information gleaned
from sources to
support major
points, but does not
synthesize. Provides
minimal justification
to sup ...
10/18/21, 7:22 PM Rubric Assessment - MHC6306-Human Resource Management in Healthcare Organizations SU01 - South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=81520&evalObjectId=415124&evalObjectType=1&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=251906&… 1/3
Close
Print RubricMHC6306 Week 5 Project Rubric
Course: MHC6306-Human Resource Management in Healthcare Organizations SU01
Criteria
No Evidence
0 points
Unsatisfactory
51 points
Satisfactory
59 points
Proficient
66 points
Exemplary
75 points
Criterion Score
Includes all
assignment
components and
meets graduate
level critical
thinking. A
purpose
statement is
identified for the
response.
/ 75
Integrates and
understands
assignments
concepts and
topics.
/ 75
Student did not
submit assignment
Work minimally
meets assignment
expectations. No
purpose statement
is provided.
Assignment meets
some expectations
with minimal depth
and breath. Purpose
statement is vague.
Assignment meets
most of
expectations with all
components being
addressed in good
depth and breadth.
Purpose statement
is present and
appropriate for the
assignment.
Assignment meets
all expectations with
exceptional depth
and breath. A
comprehensive
purpose statement
delineates all
requirements of the
assignment.
Student did not
submit assignment
Shows some degree
of understanding of
assignment
concepts.
Demonstrates a
clear understanding
of assignment
concepts.
Demonstrates the
ability to evaluate
and apply key
assignment
concepts.
Demonstrates the
ability to evaluate,
apply and integrate
key assignment
concepts.
10/18/21, 7:22 PM Rubric Assessment - MHC6306-Human Resource Management in Healthcare Organizations SU01 - South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=81520&evalObjectId=415124&evalObjectType=1&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=251906&… 2/3
Total / 250
Criteria
No Evidence
0 points
Unsatisfactory
51 points
Satisfactory
59 points
Proficient
66 points
Exemplary
75 points
Criterion Score
Synthesizes,
analyses, and
evaluates
resources to
apply concepts
in the
assignment.
/ 75
Student did not
submit assignment
Does not interpret,
apply, and
synthesize concepts,
and/or strategies.
Summarizes
information gleaned
from sources to
support major
points, but does not
synthesize. Provides
minimal justification
to support major
topics. Uses 1
credible resource in
the assignment.
Synthesizes and
justifies (defends,
explains, validates,
confirms)
information gleaned
from sources to
support major
points presented.
Uses a minimum of
2 credible resources
in the assignment.
Synthesizes and
justifies (defends,
explains, validates,
confirms)
information gleaned
from sources to
support major
points presented.
Uses 3 credible
resources for the
assignment,
including at least 1
scholarly pe ...
10/18/21, 7:22 PM Rubric Assessment - MHC6306-Human Resource Management in Healthcare Organizations SU01 - South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=81520&evalObjectId=415124&evalObjectType=1&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=251906&… 1/3
Close
Print RubricMHC6306 Week 5 Project Rubric
Course: MHC6306-Human Resource Management in Healthcare Organizations SU01
Criteria
No Evidence
0 points
Unsatisfactory
51 points
Satisfactory
59 points
Proficient
66 points
Exemplary
75 points
Criterion Score
Includes all
assignment
components and
meets graduate
level critical
thinking. A
purpose
statement is
identified for the
response.
/ 75
Integrates and
understands
assignments
concepts and
topics.
/ 75
Student did not
submit assignment
Work minimally
meets assignment
expectations. No
purpose statement
is provided.
Assignment meets
some expectations
with minimal depth
and breath. Purpose
statement is vague.
Assignment meets
most of
expectations with all
components being
addressed in good
depth and breadth.
Purpose statement
is present and
appropriate for the
assignment.
Assignment meets
all expectations with
exceptional depth
and breath. A
comprehensive
purpose statement
delineates all
requirements of the
assignment.
Student did not
submit assignment
Shows some degree
of understanding of
assignment
concepts.
Demonstrates a
clear understanding
of assignment
concepts.
Demonstrates the
ability to evaluate
and apply key
assignment
concepts.
Demonstrates the
ability to evaluate,
apply and integrate
key assignment
concepts.
10/18/21, 7:22 PM Rubric Assessment - MHC6306-Human Resource Management in Healthcare Organizations SU01 - South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=81520&evalObjectId=415124&evalObjectType=1&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=251906&… 2/3
Total / 250
Criteria
No Evidence
0 points
Unsatisfactory
51 points
Satisfactory
59 points
Proficient
66 points
Exemplary
75 points
Criterion Score
Synthesizes,
analyses, and
evaluates
resources to
apply concepts
in the
assignment.
/ 75
Student did not
submit assignment
Does not interpret,
apply, and
synthesize concepts,
and/or strategies.
Summarizes
information gleaned
from sources to
support major
points, but does not
synthesize. Provides
minimal justification
to support major
topics. Uses 1
credible resource in
the assignment.
Synthesizes and
justifies (defends,
explains, validates,
confirms)
information gleaned
from sources to
support major
points presented.
Uses a minimum of
2 credible resources
in the assignment.
Synthesizes and
justifies (defends,
explains, validates,
confirms)
information gleaned
from sources to
support major
points presented.
Uses 3 credible
resources for the
assignment,
including at least 1
scholarly pe ...
MAT-130 Homework 3 Name:_________________________________
Due Friday, April 2, 2021, no later than 4:45 P.M.
Decide whether each statement is true or false. (1 point each)
1. If ¬(𝑝 ∧ 𝑞) is true, then the truth values of p and q must be both true.
2. p → q is equivalent to ¬ 𝑝 ∨ 𝑞 .
Decide whether each is a statement or is not a statement. Note: a compound statement is still a statement.
(1 point each)
3. 12 − 24 ≤ 12
4. I command you to drive to Houston, Texas.
Write a negation of the following without using a slash symbol. (1 point each)
5. z > −28
6. 𝑧 − 2 ≤ −37
Construct a truth table for the following compound statement. (4 points)
Please show all columns, just as in the class notes.
7. 𝑞 → ¬𝑝 → 𝑞
3/30/2021 Rubric Assessment - MHA6100-Executive Leadership in Healthcare Organizations SU01 - South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=75828&evalObjectId=377969&evalObjectType=1&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=226982&… 1/2
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F
through D
Range) (1–10)
10 points
Satisfactory (C
Range)
11 points
Proficient (B Range)
(12–13)
13 points
Exemplary (A Range)
(14–15)
15 points
Criterion
Score
Includes all
assignment
components and
meets graduate level
critical thinking. A
purpose statement is
identified for the
response.
/ 15Student did not
submit
assignment.
Work minimally
meets
assignment
expectations. No
purpose
statement is
provided.
Assignment
meets some
expectations
with minimal
depth and
breath. Purpose
statement is
vague.
Assignment meets most
of expectations with all
components being
addressed in good
depth and breadth.
Purpose statement is
present and appropriate
for the assignment.
Assignment meets all
expectations with
exceptional depth
and breath. A
comprehensive
purpose statement
delineates all
requirements of the
assignment.
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F
through D Range)
(1–10)
10 points
Satisfactory (C
Range)
11 points
Proficient (B Range)
(12–13)
13 points
Exemplary (A Range)
(14–15)
15 points
Criterion
Score
Integrates and
understands
assignments
concepts and
topics.
/ 15Student did not
submit
assignment.
Shows some
degree of
understanding of
assignment
concepts.
Demonstrates a
clear
understanding of
assignment
concepts.
Demonstrates the
ability to evaluate
and apply key
assignment concepts.
Demonstrates the
ability to evaluate, apply
and integrate key
assignment concepts.
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F
through D
Range) (1–10)
10 points
Satisfactory (C Range)
11 points
Proficient (B Range)
(12–13)
13 points
Exemplary (A Range) (14–
15)
15 points
Criterion
Score
Synthesizes,
analyses,
and
evaluates
/ 15Student did not
submit
assignment.
Does not
interpret, apply,
and synthesize
Summarizes
informa
MAT-130 Homework 3 Name:_________________________________
Due Friday, April 2, 2021, no later than 4:45 P.M.
Decide whether each statement is true or false. (1 point each)
1. If ¬(𝑝 ∧ 𝑞) is true, then the truth values of p and q must be both true.
2. p → q is equivalent to ¬ 𝑝 ∨ 𝑞 .
Decide whether each is a statement or is not a statement. Note: a compound statement is still a statement.
(1 point each)
3. 12 − 24 ≤ 12
4. I command you to drive to Houston, Texas.
Write a negation of the following without using a slash symbol. (1 point each)
5. z > −28
6. 𝑧 − 2 ≤ −37
Construct a truth table for the following compound statement. (4 points)
Please show all columns, just as in the class notes.
7. 𝑞 → ¬𝑝 → 𝑞
3/30/2021 Rubric Assessment - MHA6100-Executive Leadership in Healthcare Organizations SU01 - South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=75828&evalObjectId=377969&evalObjectType=1&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=226982&… 1/2
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F
through D
Range) (1–10)
10 points
Satisfactory (C
Range)
11 points
Proficient (B Range)
(12–13)
13 points
Exemplary (A Range)
(14–15)
15 points
Criterion
Score
Includes all
assignment
components and
meets graduate level
critical thinking. A
purpose statement is
identified for the
response.
/ 15Student did not
submit
assignment.
Work minimally
meets
assignment
expectations. No
purpose
statement is
provided.
Assignment
meets some
expectations
with minimal
depth and
breath. Purpose
statement is
vague.
Assignment meets most
of expectations with all
components being
addressed in good
depth and breadth.
Purpose statement is
present and appropriate
for the assignment.
Assignment meets all
expectations with
exceptional depth
and breath. A
comprehensive
purpose statement
delineates all
requirements of the
assignment.
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F
through D Range)
(1–10)
10 points
Satisfactory (C
Range)
11 points
Proficient (B Range)
(12–13)
13 points
Exemplary (A Range)
(14–15)
15 points
Criterion
Score
Integrates and
understands
assignments
concepts and
topics.
/ 15Student did not
submit
assignment.
Shows some
degree of
understanding of
assignment
concepts.
Demonstrates a
clear
understanding of
assignment
concepts.
Demonstrates the
ability to evaluate
and apply key
assignment concepts.
Demonstrates the
ability to evaluate, apply
and integrate key
assignment concepts.
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F
through D
Range) (1–10)
10 points
Satisfactory (C Range)
11 points
Proficient (B Range)
(12–13)
13 points
Exemplary (A Range) (14–
15)
15 points
Criterion
Score
Synthesizes,
analyses,
and
evaluates
/ 15Student did not
submit
assignment.
Does not
interpret, apply,
and synthesize
Summarizes
informa
111421, 1033 AM Rubric Assessment - PSY2061-Research MethodSantosConleyha
11/14/21, 10:33 AM Rubric Assessment - PSY2061-Research Methods Lab SU01 - South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=82596&evalObjectId=420953&evalObjectType… 1/4
PSY2061 Week 7 Midweek Assignment Rubric
Course: PSY2061-Research Methods Lab SU01
Criteria
No
Submission
0 points
Emerging (F
through D
Range) (9-10)
10 points
Satisfactory (C
Range) (11-12)
12 points
Proficient (B
Range) (12-13)
13 points
Exemplary (A
Range) (14-15)
15 points
Criterion
Score
Fulfillment
of
Assignment
Expectation
s
/ 15
Student did
not submit
assignment
Submission
does not meet
assignment
expectations.
It does not
address all
parts of the
assignment.
Submission
relies on
unsupported
claims (e.g.,
personal
conjecture,
judging
assertions
without
backing
evidence).
Submission
includes
excessive use
of direct
quotations.
Submission
does not
clearly
demonstrate
critical
thinking,
synthesis of
information, or
application of
research and
course
material.
Submission
meets most
assignment
expectations.
It addresses all
parts of the
assignment,
though some
parts may be
more fully
developed
than others.
While
submission
may include
some
unsupported
claims (e.g.,
personal
conjecture,
judging
assertions),
there are also
informed and
validated
conclusions
throughout,
supported
with cited
evidence.
Submission
may have a
few direct
quotations.
However,
there is at
least an
Submission
meets all
assignment
expectations
and addresses
all parts of the
assignment.
Submission
includes
almost no
unsupported
claims (e.g.,
personal
conjecture,
judging
assertions);
rather, most of
the submission
has informed
and validated
conclusions
supported
with cited
evidence.
Submission
has no direct
quotations, or
a couple of
quotes may be
used, but they
are explained
and analyzed
in detail to
demonstrate
understanding
of the content.
The required
Submission
meets all
assignment
expectations
and addresses
all parts of the
assignment.
Submission
includes no
unsupported
claims (e.g.,
personal
conjecture,
judging
assertions).
Rather, the
submission
has informed
and validated
conclusions
that
demonstrate
both breadth
and depth of
information
and are
supported by
evidence from
cited sources.
Submission is
completely
original to the
writer, yet
gives credit to
material that
informed the
student on the
11/14/21, 10:33 AM Rubric Assessment - PSY2061-Research Methods Lab SU01 - South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=82596&evalObjectId=420953&evalObjectType… 2/4
Criteria
No
Submission
0 points
Emerging (F
through D
Range) (9-10)
10 points
Satisfactory (C
Range) (11-12)
12 points
Proficient (B
Range) (12-13)
13 points
Exemplary (A
Range) (14-15)
15 points
Criterion
Score
attempt at
explaini ...
111421, 1033 AM Rubric Assessment - PSY2061-Research MethodBenitoSumpter862
11/14/21, 10:33 AM Rubric Assessment - PSY2061-Research Methods Lab SU01 - South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=82596&evalObjectId=420953&evalObjectType… 1/4
PSY2061 Week 7 Midweek Assignment Rubric
Course: PSY2061-Research Methods Lab SU01
Criteria
No
Submission
0 points
Emerging (F
through D
Range) (9-10)
10 points
Satisfactory (C
Range) (11-12)
12 points
Proficient (B
Range) (12-13)
13 points
Exemplary (A
Range) (14-15)
15 points
Criterion
Score
Fulfillment
of
Assignment
Expectation
s
/ 15
Student did
not submit
assignment
Submission
does not meet
assignment
expectations.
It does not
address all
parts of the
assignment.
Submission
relies on
unsupported
claims (e.g.,
personal
conjecture,
judging
assertions
without
backing
evidence).
Submission
includes
excessive use
of direct
quotations.
Submission
does not
clearly
demonstrate
critical
thinking,
synthesis of
information, or
application of
research and
course
material.
Submission
meets most
assignment
expectations.
It addresses all
parts of the
assignment,
though some
parts may be
more fully
developed
than others.
While
submission
may include
some
unsupported
claims (e.g.,
personal
conjecture,
judging
assertions),
there are also
informed and
validated
conclusions
throughout,
supported
with cited
evidence.
Submission
may have a
few direct
quotations.
However,
there is at
least an
Submission
meets all
assignment
expectations
and addresses
all parts of the
assignment.
Submission
includes
almost no
unsupported
claims (e.g.,
personal
conjecture,
judging
assertions);
rather, most of
the submission
has informed
and validated
conclusions
supported
with cited
evidence.
Submission
has no direct
quotations, or
a couple of
quotes may be
used, but they
are explained
and analyzed
in detail to
demonstrate
understanding
of the content.
The required
Submission
meets all
assignment
expectations
and addresses
all parts of the
assignment.
Submission
includes no
unsupported
claims (e.g.,
personal
conjecture,
judging
assertions).
Rather, the
submission
has informed
and validated
conclusions
that
demonstrate
both breadth
and depth of
information
and are
supported by
evidence from
cited sources.
Submission is
completely
original to the
writer, yet
gives credit to
material that
informed the
student on the
11/14/21, 10:33 AM Rubric Assessment - PSY2061-Research Methods Lab SU01 - South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=82596&evalObjectId=420953&evalObjectType… 2/4
Criteria
No
Submission
0 points
Emerging (F
through D
Range) (9-10)
10 points
Satisfactory (C
Range) (11-12)
12 points
Proficient (B
Range) (12-13)
13 points
Exemplary (A
Range) (14-15)
15 points
Criterion
Score
attempt at
explaini ...
Signature Assignments are those assignments chosen by the WNMU Sch.docxmaoanderton
Signature Assignments are those assignments chosen by the WNMU School of Social Work faculty to evaluate a student’s ability to demonstrate the CSWE-mandated core competencies and related practice behaviors. In addition to measuring student competency, the assignments are used as indicators of program efficacy. Signature assignments are clearly identified in all School of Social Work syllabi.
Students must demonstrate competency in order to pass each course. Students must complete all signature assignments throughout their program of study. Failure to complete a signature assignment in any course will result in automatic failure of the course, and will result in a referral to the Student Performance Committee for possible re-evaluation of School of Social Work admission.
SWK 527 -SIGNATURE ASSIGNMENT: PRACTICE MODEL COMPARISON (2.1.3 a, b, c)
For this assignment, students will apply critical thinking to inform and communicate professional judgments. Students will analyze models of intervention by choosing and comparing two intervention models. In this assignment, students must:
1. Thoroughly describe at least two treatment models, including information about the evidence that supports the use of the model to assist clients with problems.
2. Provide a thorough comparison of the two models, including strengths, criticisms, and potential weaknesses of the models.
3. Provide a thorough description and comparison of the role of the social worker using each model.
4. Provide a thoughtful comparison of the perspective of the human condition (how does each model see people and their problems?), and the approach for problem solving used in each model.
5. Provide a thoughtful comparison of how tasks for improving the client’s problems are assigned or completed.
6. Communicate a preference for a perspective/model/mode of treatment that is based on information learned through this assignment.
Write a paper limited to no more than 6 double spaced pages using Times New Roman 12 point font. In addition to the textbook, in your discussion students must include two scholarly sources for each model.
You must use APA style, including double spaced. Be sure to review the grading rubric before you start writing so you include all the required components. This paper is to be written in APA format with appropriate running head, page numbering, title page (which does not count towards the length of the paper), headers/sub-headers, academic citations and references for this paper.
SWK 527
EPAS 2.1.3: Apply critical thinking to inform and communicate professional judgments
Criteria
18-20 Points
Capstone (A)
16-17 Points
Benchmark (B)
14-15 Points
Emerging Skill (C)
0-13 Points
Not Competent (D/F)
Scoring
APA:
-Title page (2 pts.),
-Running head (2 pts.)
-Page numbers (2 pts.)
-Reference page (4 pts.)
-In text citations (4 pts.)
-Page headings (2 pts.),
-Font (12 pt. Times New Roman) (2pts.)
-Margins and spacing (2 pts.).
Successfully demonstrates maste.
College of Administrative and Financial SciencesAssign.docxmccormicknadine86
College of Administrative and Financial Sciences
Assignment 3- Strategic Management
(MGT 401)
Course Name: Strategic Management
Student’s Name:
Course Code: MGT 401
Student’s ID Number:
Semester: II
CRN:
Academic Year: 1440/1441 H
For Instructor’s Use only
Instructor’s Name:
Students’ Grade: Marks Obtained/Out of
Level of Marks: High/Middle/Low
Instructions for the three assignments – PLEASE READ THEM CAREFULLY
· The Assignment must be submitted on Blackboard (WORD format only) via allocated folder.
· Assignments submitted through email will not be accepted.
· Students are advised to make their work clear and well presented, marks may be reduced for poor presentation. This includes filling your information on the cover page.
· Students must mention question number clearly in their answer.
· Late submission will NOT be accepted.
· Avoid plagiarism, the work should be in your own words, copying from students or other resources without proper referencing will result in ZERO marks. No exceptions.
· All answered must be typed using Times New Roman (size 12, double-spaced) font. No pictures containing text will be accepted and will be considered plagiarism).
· Submissions without this cover page will NOT be accepted.
Assignment 3:
Part 3 of project & Discussion Questions
Learning outcomes:
1. Understand issues related to strategic competitive advantage in diversified organizations (Lo 2.2)
2. Gain insights into the strategy-making processes of different types of organizations ( Lo 1.7)
3. Identify appropriate strategies for different situations (Lo 3.1).
This assignment 3 includes two independent sections: section 1-complement of project & section 2- discussion questions.
Section 1 = Part 3 of project
Questions
Consider the same company ‘X’ that you have already used in assignment 1& 2 and answer the following questions.
1. Evaluate the performance of the main activity of your selected company (performance of principal product/service). What type(s) of criteria do you use to evaluate this performance?
2. What type(s) of control of employees and production processes is/are used by your selected company?
3. How does the corporation manage the environmental risks?
4. Evaluate the competitive advantage of the corporation on its market. Suggest some recommendations for the managers of your selected company to improve this competitive advantage.
End of the project
Section 2 = Discussion Questions.
Questions
Discuss the following questions:
1. Is the evaluation and control process appropriate for a corporation that emphasizes creativity? Are control and creativity compatible? Explain. - Max 300 words
2. How can corporate culture be changed? Give examples. Max 250 words
3. How is the cellular/modular structure different from the network structure? Give at least three differences. – Max 200 words
Answers:
PUBLIC
PUBLIC
PUBLIC
Weekly Lecture
Week 2 will focus on several is ...
Employee Testing and SelectionOnce you build upon your appTanaMaeskm
Employee Testing and Selection
Once you build upon your applicant pool, the next phase is to explain how to use various tools to
select the best candidate for the job. The main topics we’ll cover include the selection process, basic
testing techniques, types of tests, work samples and simulations, and making background and
reference checks. There are also several techniques you can use to improve your skills at what is
probably the most widely used screening tool, the selection interview.
The Importance of Selection
Properly selecting the most quali�ed applicants for review is probably the biggest challenge and task
for managers to reduce the applicant pool and to �t the best candidate for the job. The aim is to �nd
the person-job �t based upon the knowledge, skills, abilities and other competencies (KSACs).
KSACs
Review each icon to know more.
There are three reasons as to why choosing the right candidate is important:
To ensure the candidates have the right skills who will perform.
Good selection is costly when you’re recruiting and hiring.
Inept hiring has legal consequences.
Recall your reading that equal employment laws require nondiscriminatory selection procedures.
Selection Tools
There are several popular selection tools. Proper consideration and particular attention are very
important in selecting the correct tool testing instrument to validate your overall results. Regardless
of the various tools you may use, the key point to understand is they have to be reliable and
consistent.
Background Investigations
Background checks/references is an inexpensive process if done right. How deeply this background
check should be conducted depends on the position the individual has applied for. Another factor for
this process is the legality of improper defamation. Below is a great article on why companies must be
careful on how they use the information received from background checks:
Adams, S. (2013, June 21). Background checks on the job candidates: Be very careful. Forbes
Leadership. Retrieved from
https://www.forbes.com/sites/susanadams/2013/06/21/background-checks-on-job-
candidates-be-very-careful/#5a7bd0646ea8
Additional Materials
From your course textbook, Human Resource Management, review the following chapter:
Employee Testing and Selection
From the South University Online Library, review the following articles:
The Cult of Personality Testing: Why Assessments Are Essential for Employee Selection
(https://www.thecampuscommon.com/library/ezproxy/ticketdemocs.asp?
sch=suo&turl=http://search.ebscohost.com.southuniversity.libproxy.edmc.edu/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=edo&AN=70221080&site=eds-live)
Using Personality Testing as Part of the Employee Selection Process
(https://www.thecampuscommon.com/library/ezproxy/ticketdemocs.asp?
sch=suo&turl=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=a9h&AN=120001349&site=eds-live)
Interviewee Selection Test and Evaluator Assessments of General Mental Ability, Emotional ...
Analysis of Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs): Item and Test Statistics from a...iosrjce
IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences is one of the speciality Journal in Dental Science and Medical Science published by International Organization of Scientific Research (IOSR). The Journal publishes papers of the highest scientific merit and widest possible scope work in all areas related to medical and dental science. The Journal welcome review articles, leading medical and clinical research articles, technical notes, case reports and others.
Given the challenges of researching, assessing, and treating childre.docxjoyjonna282
Given the challenges of researching, assessing, and treating children at a period with limited ability to communicate, behaviorism appears to offer one of the most effective approaches for meeting the challenges of early childhood disorders. Write a short paper assessing behaviorism for two specific strengths and two specific weaknesses for the assessment and treatment of early childhood disorders.
Requirements of submission:
Short paper assignments must follow these formatting guidelines: double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and APA style citations. Page length requirements: Short papers are expected to be 2–4 pages in length, not including title page, abstract, or references.
Refer to this
link
for viewing and printing Turnitin paper feedback.
Instructor Feedback
: Students can find their feedback in Turnitin or the Grade Center.
Critical Elements
Exemplary
Proficient
Needs Improvement
Not Evident
Value
Behaviorism Strengths
Student’s evaluation of two strengths of behaviorism for assessment and treatment of preschool children is highly detailed with consideration for implications in practice
(32-35)
Student’s evaluation of two strengths of behaviorism for assessment and treatment of preschool children is clear and concise
(28-31)
Student’s evaluation of one of the strengths of behaviorism for assessment and treatment may be vague or lack clarity
(25-27)
The strengths of behaviorism for assessment and treatment may be vague or lack clarity for the two required strengths OR the student offers only one strength for meeting this requirement
(0-24)
35
Behaviorism Weaknesses
Student’s evaluation of two weaknesses of behaviorism for assessment and treatment of preschool children is highly detailed with consideration for implications in practice
(
32-35
)
Student’s evaluation of two weaknesses of behaviorism for assessment and treatment of preschool children is clear and concise
(28-31)
Student’s evaluation of one of the weaknesses of behaviorism for assessment and treatment may be vague or lack clarity
(25-27)
The weaknesses of behaviorism for assessment and treatment may be vague or lack clarity for the two required strengths OR the student offers only one weakness for meeting this requirement
(0-24)
35
Research
Citations utilized in support of strengths and weaknesses are professional, consistent with the identified resources, and extend from a variety of sources to ensure a balanced perspective
(18-20)
Citations utilized in support of strengths and weaknesses are professional and consistent with the identified resources
(16-17)
Citations utilized in support of at least one of the strengths or weaknesses are not portrayed consistently with the provided source OR at least one of the strengths and weaknesses lack citation support
(14-15)
Citations utilized in support of at two or more of the strengths or weaknesses are not portrayed consistently with the provided source OR two or more strength.
Opportunities and Challenges Inherent In Technical and Vocational Schools; Co...inventionjournals
Present study is to evaluate quality and quantity of technical and vocational courses to study the present status and improve activities regarding centers' manager and employers' thoughts in Alborz province. Considering the fact that centers' manager at commence and employers at the end deal with probationers; their needs analysis and adaptation of training policies with their need is one of the important aspect of evaluation and their comments regarding students' knowledge level, acquired skill and capability in assigned tasks is important. This research has evaluated the quality and quantity of technical and vocational courses in Alborz province and girl students and graduated students success in these courses as an unofficial training system. Method of this research is qualitative and quantitative (mixed) and population for this study is technical and vocational training centers' manager and employers. Instrument of study includes a questionnaire that it is provided with Servqual model by researcher. In order to analyze the data, descriptive and inferential statistics, coding and SPSS software were used. Findings showed that the mean of physical services, validity, accountability, reassurance and empathy in girl technical and vocational training centers are in optimal level in centers' manager thought and whereas employers' thought different
This study aims at pointing out Shaqra university staff’s degree of practicing the necessary academic requirements needed for improving their performance in the spheres of the university academic performance. The survey-descriptive approach and the measurement approach (questionnaire) are applied to achieve the purpose of this study. The number, on which the study is applied, is 358 members of the university staff. The questionnaire is divided into three sections related to the following domains: the first section is about Shaqra university staff’s practice degree in the sphere of education and learning; the second section is about Shaqra university staff’s practice degree in the sphere of scientific research; the third section is about Shaqra university staff’s practice degree in the sphere of community service.
Concerning Shaqra university staff’s practice degree in the sphere of education and learning, the results is more than 50 % of the university staff members. From their viewpoint, they consider the degree of practicing the necessary academic requirements for improving their performance in the sphere of education and learning is good. Besides, 37.5 % of the university staff regards their practice performance as medium and low. While, in regard of the university staff’s practice degree in the sphere of scientific research, less than 50 % of the university staff members consider the practice of the university staff’s is good, in the light of their standpoint regarding the essential academic requirements for improving the scientific research. Moreover, 53.4 % views their practice for the advancement of their performance is medium and low. In respect of the practice degree of the university staff in the sphere of community service, 50 % of the university staff regards it as good, in the light of their viewpoint of practicing the essential academic requirements for improving their performance in the domain of the community service. Besides, 50 % of the university staff considers their participation for the improvement is medium and low. The study’s result indicates that there is a firm direct correlation between the section of education and learning and the section of scientific research, in addition to that medium direct correlation between the section of scientific research and the section of community service. The research’s most obvious recommendations are: establishing special strategy and criterion for improving the performance, offering training courses in this respect, and concentrating on the interaction of the section of education and learning and the section of scientific research, with the section of community service.
“The Effectiveness and Efficiency of the Various Graduate Recruitment Methods”IOSRJBM
Purpose: Research in the field of Recruitment and Selection have become a dynamic study area over the past few decades and is likely to become even more so as the importance of human resource management is rapidly gaining momentum. Therefore understanding the various recruitment methods will be viewed as increasingly important. The global-economy has undergone a drastic change over the last few years. Globalization, privatization, liberalization all contribute to this change. The global-economy has scaled great heights, but in the recent-past recession has been a major road block. There are several consequences to recession, but the major one has been job-cuts .Securing a job today is a challenging and complicated task and to add to the complexity, the recruitment procedure has changed completely over the years. This article aims at examining the effectiveness and efficiency of graduate-recruitment methods in today’s world by using extensive literature review and secondary research.
Assignment 2 Community Prevention ProgramAfter hearing that a n.docxBenitoSumpter862
Assignment 2: Community Prevention Program
After hearing that a neighbor’s child, Jeremy, age seven, was sexually assaulted in the local park, the parents of Cherry Hill township decide that their community needs a program to prevent sexual abuse of their children in the future.
Prepare a presentation for the parents, providing pertinent information they might like to include in a Sexual Assault Prevention program aimed at the children in their community. Suggest the psychoeducational and supportive approaches that can be effectively used at the community level, such as in community centers, schools, and social service agencies, to provide this information to the children. Address issues of gender, diversity, and ethics in your presentation.
Submit your PowerPoint presentation to the
W2: Assignment 2 Dropbox
by
Wednesday, July 19, 2017
. Your response should be at least 5 - 6 slides and include speaker notes for each slide. In addition, make sure you have included a title slide and a reference slide.
Assignment 2 Grading Criteria
Maximum Points
Analyzed pertinent information they deem relevant to the development of a Sexual Assault Prevention program
25
Described the psychoeducational information and supportive approaches that the community can effectively use to deal with the issue of sexual abuse of children
30
Addressed the issues of gender, diversity, and ethics in the context of intervention approaches
25
Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources, displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
20
Total:
100
.
Assignment 2 Analyzing World CulturesMedia play a very large role.docxBenitoSumpter862
Assignment 2: Analyzing World Cultures
Media play a very large role in both the development and the perpetuation of cultural elements. You may never have watched a foreign movie or even clips evaluating other cultures. In this assignment, you will explore online videos or movies from a culture of your choice and analyze how cultural elements are presented, compared to your own culture.
Complete the following:
Choose a world culture you are not familiar with.
Identify two–three online videos or movies representative of this culture. These could be examples of cultural expressions such as a Bollywood movie from India or Anime videos from Japan.
Evaluate two hours of such a video. Using the readings for this module, the Argosy University online library resources, and the Internet, research articles about your selected culture.
Select a scholarly article that analyzes the same culture presented in the videos you have observed.
Write a paper describing the cultural differences you have observed in the video. How are these observations supported by the research article?
Be sure to include the following:
Describe the videos you have watched.
Explain the main points of the videos.
Examine what stood out about the culture.
Compare and contrast the similarities and differences of this culture with your own.
Examine the ways of this culture. Is it one you would want to visit or live in?
Would you experience culture shock if you immersed yourself in this culture? Why or why not?
Support your statements with examples and scholarly references.
Write a 2–3-page paper in Word format. Apply APA standards to citation of sources. Use the following file naming convention: LastnameFirstInitial_M2_A2.doc.
.
More Related Content
Similar to 10421, 736 AM Rubric Assessment - MHC6306-Human Resource Ma
Signature Assignments are those assignments chosen by the WNMU Sch.docxmaoanderton
Signature Assignments are those assignments chosen by the WNMU School of Social Work faculty to evaluate a student’s ability to demonstrate the CSWE-mandated core competencies and related practice behaviors. In addition to measuring student competency, the assignments are used as indicators of program efficacy. Signature assignments are clearly identified in all School of Social Work syllabi.
Students must demonstrate competency in order to pass each course. Students must complete all signature assignments throughout their program of study. Failure to complete a signature assignment in any course will result in automatic failure of the course, and will result in a referral to the Student Performance Committee for possible re-evaluation of School of Social Work admission.
SWK 527 -SIGNATURE ASSIGNMENT: PRACTICE MODEL COMPARISON (2.1.3 a, b, c)
For this assignment, students will apply critical thinking to inform and communicate professional judgments. Students will analyze models of intervention by choosing and comparing two intervention models. In this assignment, students must:
1. Thoroughly describe at least two treatment models, including information about the evidence that supports the use of the model to assist clients with problems.
2. Provide a thorough comparison of the two models, including strengths, criticisms, and potential weaknesses of the models.
3. Provide a thorough description and comparison of the role of the social worker using each model.
4. Provide a thoughtful comparison of the perspective of the human condition (how does each model see people and their problems?), and the approach for problem solving used in each model.
5. Provide a thoughtful comparison of how tasks for improving the client’s problems are assigned or completed.
6. Communicate a preference for a perspective/model/mode of treatment that is based on information learned through this assignment.
Write a paper limited to no more than 6 double spaced pages using Times New Roman 12 point font. In addition to the textbook, in your discussion students must include two scholarly sources for each model.
You must use APA style, including double spaced. Be sure to review the grading rubric before you start writing so you include all the required components. This paper is to be written in APA format with appropriate running head, page numbering, title page (which does not count towards the length of the paper), headers/sub-headers, academic citations and references for this paper.
SWK 527
EPAS 2.1.3: Apply critical thinking to inform and communicate professional judgments
Criteria
18-20 Points
Capstone (A)
16-17 Points
Benchmark (B)
14-15 Points
Emerging Skill (C)
0-13 Points
Not Competent (D/F)
Scoring
APA:
-Title page (2 pts.),
-Running head (2 pts.)
-Page numbers (2 pts.)
-Reference page (4 pts.)
-In text citations (4 pts.)
-Page headings (2 pts.),
-Font (12 pt. Times New Roman) (2pts.)
-Margins and spacing (2 pts.).
Successfully demonstrates maste.
College of Administrative and Financial SciencesAssign.docxmccormicknadine86
College of Administrative and Financial Sciences
Assignment 3- Strategic Management
(MGT 401)
Course Name: Strategic Management
Student’s Name:
Course Code: MGT 401
Student’s ID Number:
Semester: II
CRN:
Academic Year: 1440/1441 H
For Instructor’s Use only
Instructor’s Name:
Students’ Grade: Marks Obtained/Out of
Level of Marks: High/Middle/Low
Instructions for the three assignments – PLEASE READ THEM CAREFULLY
· The Assignment must be submitted on Blackboard (WORD format only) via allocated folder.
· Assignments submitted through email will not be accepted.
· Students are advised to make their work clear and well presented, marks may be reduced for poor presentation. This includes filling your information on the cover page.
· Students must mention question number clearly in their answer.
· Late submission will NOT be accepted.
· Avoid plagiarism, the work should be in your own words, copying from students or other resources without proper referencing will result in ZERO marks. No exceptions.
· All answered must be typed using Times New Roman (size 12, double-spaced) font. No pictures containing text will be accepted and will be considered plagiarism).
· Submissions without this cover page will NOT be accepted.
Assignment 3:
Part 3 of project & Discussion Questions
Learning outcomes:
1. Understand issues related to strategic competitive advantage in diversified organizations (Lo 2.2)
2. Gain insights into the strategy-making processes of different types of organizations ( Lo 1.7)
3. Identify appropriate strategies for different situations (Lo 3.1).
This assignment 3 includes two independent sections: section 1-complement of project & section 2- discussion questions.
Section 1 = Part 3 of project
Questions
Consider the same company ‘X’ that you have already used in assignment 1& 2 and answer the following questions.
1. Evaluate the performance of the main activity of your selected company (performance of principal product/service). What type(s) of criteria do you use to evaluate this performance?
2. What type(s) of control of employees and production processes is/are used by your selected company?
3. How does the corporation manage the environmental risks?
4. Evaluate the competitive advantage of the corporation on its market. Suggest some recommendations for the managers of your selected company to improve this competitive advantage.
End of the project
Section 2 = Discussion Questions.
Questions
Discuss the following questions:
1. Is the evaluation and control process appropriate for a corporation that emphasizes creativity? Are control and creativity compatible? Explain. - Max 300 words
2. How can corporate culture be changed? Give examples. Max 250 words
3. How is the cellular/modular structure different from the network structure? Give at least three differences. – Max 200 words
Answers:
PUBLIC
PUBLIC
PUBLIC
Weekly Lecture
Week 2 will focus on several is ...
Employee Testing and SelectionOnce you build upon your appTanaMaeskm
Employee Testing and Selection
Once you build upon your applicant pool, the next phase is to explain how to use various tools to
select the best candidate for the job. The main topics we’ll cover include the selection process, basic
testing techniques, types of tests, work samples and simulations, and making background and
reference checks. There are also several techniques you can use to improve your skills at what is
probably the most widely used screening tool, the selection interview.
The Importance of Selection
Properly selecting the most quali�ed applicants for review is probably the biggest challenge and task
for managers to reduce the applicant pool and to �t the best candidate for the job. The aim is to �nd
the person-job �t based upon the knowledge, skills, abilities and other competencies (KSACs).
KSACs
Review each icon to know more.
There are three reasons as to why choosing the right candidate is important:
To ensure the candidates have the right skills who will perform.
Good selection is costly when you’re recruiting and hiring.
Inept hiring has legal consequences.
Recall your reading that equal employment laws require nondiscriminatory selection procedures.
Selection Tools
There are several popular selection tools. Proper consideration and particular attention are very
important in selecting the correct tool testing instrument to validate your overall results. Regardless
of the various tools you may use, the key point to understand is they have to be reliable and
consistent.
Background Investigations
Background checks/references is an inexpensive process if done right. How deeply this background
check should be conducted depends on the position the individual has applied for. Another factor for
this process is the legality of improper defamation. Below is a great article on why companies must be
careful on how they use the information received from background checks:
Adams, S. (2013, June 21). Background checks on the job candidates: Be very careful. Forbes
Leadership. Retrieved from
https://www.forbes.com/sites/susanadams/2013/06/21/background-checks-on-job-
candidates-be-very-careful/#5a7bd0646ea8
Additional Materials
From your course textbook, Human Resource Management, review the following chapter:
Employee Testing and Selection
From the South University Online Library, review the following articles:
The Cult of Personality Testing: Why Assessments Are Essential for Employee Selection
(https://www.thecampuscommon.com/library/ezproxy/ticketdemocs.asp?
sch=suo&turl=http://search.ebscohost.com.southuniversity.libproxy.edmc.edu/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=edo&AN=70221080&site=eds-live)
Using Personality Testing as Part of the Employee Selection Process
(https://www.thecampuscommon.com/library/ezproxy/ticketdemocs.asp?
sch=suo&turl=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=a9h&AN=120001349&site=eds-live)
Interviewee Selection Test and Evaluator Assessments of General Mental Ability, Emotional ...
Analysis of Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs): Item and Test Statistics from a...iosrjce
IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences is one of the speciality Journal in Dental Science and Medical Science published by International Organization of Scientific Research (IOSR). The Journal publishes papers of the highest scientific merit and widest possible scope work in all areas related to medical and dental science. The Journal welcome review articles, leading medical and clinical research articles, technical notes, case reports and others.
Given the challenges of researching, assessing, and treating childre.docxjoyjonna282
Given the challenges of researching, assessing, and treating children at a period with limited ability to communicate, behaviorism appears to offer one of the most effective approaches for meeting the challenges of early childhood disorders. Write a short paper assessing behaviorism for two specific strengths and two specific weaknesses for the assessment and treatment of early childhood disorders.
Requirements of submission:
Short paper assignments must follow these formatting guidelines: double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and APA style citations. Page length requirements: Short papers are expected to be 2–4 pages in length, not including title page, abstract, or references.
Refer to this
link
for viewing and printing Turnitin paper feedback.
Instructor Feedback
: Students can find their feedback in Turnitin or the Grade Center.
Critical Elements
Exemplary
Proficient
Needs Improvement
Not Evident
Value
Behaviorism Strengths
Student’s evaluation of two strengths of behaviorism for assessment and treatment of preschool children is highly detailed with consideration for implications in practice
(32-35)
Student’s evaluation of two strengths of behaviorism for assessment and treatment of preschool children is clear and concise
(28-31)
Student’s evaluation of one of the strengths of behaviorism for assessment and treatment may be vague or lack clarity
(25-27)
The strengths of behaviorism for assessment and treatment may be vague or lack clarity for the two required strengths OR the student offers only one strength for meeting this requirement
(0-24)
35
Behaviorism Weaknesses
Student’s evaluation of two weaknesses of behaviorism for assessment and treatment of preschool children is highly detailed with consideration for implications in practice
(
32-35
)
Student’s evaluation of two weaknesses of behaviorism for assessment and treatment of preschool children is clear and concise
(28-31)
Student’s evaluation of one of the weaknesses of behaviorism for assessment and treatment may be vague or lack clarity
(25-27)
The weaknesses of behaviorism for assessment and treatment may be vague or lack clarity for the two required strengths OR the student offers only one weakness for meeting this requirement
(0-24)
35
Research
Citations utilized in support of strengths and weaknesses are professional, consistent with the identified resources, and extend from a variety of sources to ensure a balanced perspective
(18-20)
Citations utilized in support of strengths and weaknesses are professional and consistent with the identified resources
(16-17)
Citations utilized in support of at least one of the strengths or weaknesses are not portrayed consistently with the provided source OR at least one of the strengths and weaknesses lack citation support
(14-15)
Citations utilized in support of at two or more of the strengths or weaknesses are not portrayed consistently with the provided source OR two or more strength.
Opportunities and Challenges Inherent In Technical and Vocational Schools; Co...inventionjournals
Present study is to evaluate quality and quantity of technical and vocational courses to study the present status and improve activities regarding centers' manager and employers' thoughts in Alborz province. Considering the fact that centers' manager at commence and employers at the end deal with probationers; their needs analysis and adaptation of training policies with their need is one of the important aspect of evaluation and their comments regarding students' knowledge level, acquired skill and capability in assigned tasks is important. This research has evaluated the quality and quantity of technical and vocational courses in Alborz province and girl students and graduated students success in these courses as an unofficial training system. Method of this research is qualitative and quantitative (mixed) and population for this study is technical and vocational training centers' manager and employers. Instrument of study includes a questionnaire that it is provided with Servqual model by researcher. In order to analyze the data, descriptive and inferential statistics, coding and SPSS software were used. Findings showed that the mean of physical services, validity, accountability, reassurance and empathy in girl technical and vocational training centers are in optimal level in centers' manager thought and whereas employers' thought different
This study aims at pointing out Shaqra university staff’s degree of practicing the necessary academic requirements needed for improving their performance in the spheres of the university academic performance. The survey-descriptive approach and the measurement approach (questionnaire) are applied to achieve the purpose of this study. The number, on which the study is applied, is 358 members of the university staff. The questionnaire is divided into three sections related to the following domains: the first section is about Shaqra university staff’s practice degree in the sphere of education and learning; the second section is about Shaqra university staff’s practice degree in the sphere of scientific research; the third section is about Shaqra university staff’s practice degree in the sphere of community service.
Concerning Shaqra university staff’s practice degree in the sphere of education and learning, the results is more than 50 % of the university staff members. From their viewpoint, they consider the degree of practicing the necessary academic requirements for improving their performance in the sphere of education and learning is good. Besides, 37.5 % of the university staff regards their practice performance as medium and low. While, in regard of the university staff’s practice degree in the sphere of scientific research, less than 50 % of the university staff members consider the practice of the university staff’s is good, in the light of their standpoint regarding the essential academic requirements for improving the scientific research. Moreover, 53.4 % views their practice for the advancement of their performance is medium and low. In respect of the practice degree of the university staff in the sphere of community service, 50 % of the university staff regards it as good, in the light of their viewpoint of practicing the essential academic requirements for improving their performance in the domain of the community service. Besides, 50 % of the university staff considers their participation for the improvement is medium and low. The study’s result indicates that there is a firm direct correlation between the section of education and learning and the section of scientific research, in addition to that medium direct correlation between the section of scientific research and the section of community service. The research’s most obvious recommendations are: establishing special strategy and criterion for improving the performance, offering training courses in this respect, and concentrating on the interaction of the section of education and learning and the section of scientific research, with the section of community service.
“The Effectiveness and Efficiency of the Various Graduate Recruitment Methods”IOSRJBM
Purpose: Research in the field of Recruitment and Selection have become a dynamic study area over the past few decades and is likely to become even more so as the importance of human resource management is rapidly gaining momentum. Therefore understanding the various recruitment methods will be viewed as increasingly important. The global-economy has undergone a drastic change over the last few years. Globalization, privatization, liberalization all contribute to this change. The global-economy has scaled great heights, but in the recent-past recession has been a major road block. There are several consequences to recession, but the major one has been job-cuts .Securing a job today is a challenging and complicated task and to add to the complexity, the recruitment procedure has changed completely over the years. This article aims at examining the effectiveness and efficiency of graduate-recruitment methods in today’s world by using extensive literature review and secondary research.
Assignment 2 Community Prevention ProgramAfter hearing that a n.docxBenitoSumpter862
Assignment 2: Community Prevention Program
After hearing that a neighbor’s child, Jeremy, age seven, was sexually assaulted in the local park, the parents of Cherry Hill township decide that their community needs a program to prevent sexual abuse of their children in the future.
Prepare a presentation for the parents, providing pertinent information they might like to include in a Sexual Assault Prevention program aimed at the children in their community. Suggest the psychoeducational and supportive approaches that can be effectively used at the community level, such as in community centers, schools, and social service agencies, to provide this information to the children. Address issues of gender, diversity, and ethics in your presentation.
Submit your PowerPoint presentation to the
W2: Assignment 2 Dropbox
by
Wednesday, July 19, 2017
. Your response should be at least 5 - 6 slides and include speaker notes for each slide. In addition, make sure you have included a title slide and a reference slide.
Assignment 2 Grading Criteria
Maximum Points
Analyzed pertinent information they deem relevant to the development of a Sexual Assault Prevention program
25
Described the psychoeducational information and supportive approaches that the community can effectively use to deal with the issue of sexual abuse of children
30
Addressed the issues of gender, diversity, and ethics in the context of intervention approaches
25
Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources, displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
20
Total:
100
.
Assignment 2 Analyzing World CulturesMedia play a very large role.docxBenitoSumpter862
Assignment 2: Analyzing World Cultures
Media play a very large role in both the development and the perpetuation of cultural elements. You may never have watched a foreign movie or even clips evaluating other cultures. In this assignment, you will explore online videos or movies from a culture of your choice and analyze how cultural elements are presented, compared to your own culture.
Complete the following:
Choose a world culture you are not familiar with.
Identify two–three online videos or movies representative of this culture. These could be examples of cultural expressions such as a Bollywood movie from India or Anime videos from Japan.
Evaluate two hours of such a video. Using the readings for this module, the Argosy University online library resources, and the Internet, research articles about your selected culture.
Select a scholarly article that analyzes the same culture presented in the videos you have observed.
Write a paper describing the cultural differences you have observed in the video. How are these observations supported by the research article?
Be sure to include the following:
Describe the videos you have watched.
Explain the main points of the videos.
Examine what stood out about the culture.
Compare and contrast the similarities and differences of this culture with your own.
Examine the ways of this culture. Is it one you would want to visit or live in?
Would you experience culture shock if you immersed yourself in this culture? Why or why not?
Support your statements with examples and scholarly references.
Write a 2–3-page paper in Word format. Apply APA standards to citation of sources. Use the following file naming convention: LastnameFirstInitial_M2_A2.doc.
.
Assignment 2 Communicating Bad News Leaders and managers often ha.docxBenitoSumpter862
Assignment 2: Communicating Bad News
Leaders and managers often have to deliver unpleasant or difficult information to other employees or other internal or external stakeholders. How well this news is delivered can affect employee relations as well as public perceptions.
Review the following scenario:
A new company claims it manufactures the best dog food in the market. It employs around 250 people worldwide. After six months in business, one of the company’s brands is found to contain harmful bacteria. Overnight, reports start pouring in from all over the country about pets falling sick, some critically. The company wants to communicate with its stakeholders through a memo before major news channels start to cover the disease.
Assume that you are an assistant to the company’s chairperson. Based on your analysis of the scenario and using the reading material covered in this module, draft two memos for the chairperson. One memo should address the board of directors and the other the company’s employees.
Make assumptions about whether it is the food product that has bacteria or if there is another explanation for the pets’ sickness.
Write a 1–2-page paper in Word format. Apply APA standards to citation of sources. Use the following file naming convention: LastnameFirstInitial_M2_A2.doc.
.
Assignment 2 Communicating Bad NewsLeaders and managers often hav.docxBenitoSumpter862
Assignment 2: Communicating Bad News
Leaders and managers often have to deliver unpleasant or difficult information to other employees or other internal or external stakeholders. How well this news is delivered can affect employee relations as well as public perceptions.
Review the following scenario:
A new company claims it manufactures the best dog food in the market. It employs around 250 people worldwide. After six months in business, one of the company’s brands is found to contain harmful bacteria. Overnight, reports start pouring in from all over the country about pets falling sick, some critically. The company wants to communicate with its stakeholders through a memo before major news channels start to cover the disease.
Assume that you are an assistant to the company’s chairperson. Based on your analysis of the scenario and using the reading material covered in this module, draft two memos for the chairperson. One memo should address the board of directors and the other the company’s employees.
Make assumptions about whether it is the food product that has bacteria or if there is another explanation for the pets’ sickness.
Write a 1–2-page paper in Word format. Apply APA standards to citation of sources. Use the following file naming convention: LastnameFirstInitial_M2_A2.doc.
By
Wednesday, July 19, 2017
, submit your assignment to the
M2: Assignment 2 Dropbox
.
Assignment 2 Grading Criteria
Maximum Points
Effectively utilized the tips covered in the module, to write an appropriate memo addressing the board of directors to convey the bad news.
40
Effectively utilized the tips covered in the module, to write a suitable memo addressing the company’s employees to convey the bad news.
40
Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; and displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
20
Total:
100
.
Assignment 2 Case of Anna OOne of the very first cases that c.docxBenitoSumpter862
Assignment 2: Case of Anna O
One of the very first cases that caught Freud’s attention when he was starting to develop his psychoanalytic theory was that of Anna O, a patient of fellow psychiatrist Josef Breuer. Although Freud did not directly treat her, he did thoroughly analyze her case as he was fascinated by the fact that her hysteria was “cured” by Breuer. It is her case that he believes was the beginning of the psychoanalytic approach.
Through your analysis of this case, you will not only look deeper into Freud’s psychoanalytic theory but also see how Jung’s neo-psychoanalytic theory compares and contrasts with Freud’s theory.
Review the following:
The Case of Anna O.
One of the first cases that inspired Freud in the development of what would eventually become the Psychoanalytic Theory was the case of Anna O. Anna O. was actually a patient of one of Freud’s colleagues Josef Breuer. Using Breuer’s case notes, Freud was able to analyze the key facts of Anna O’s case.
Anna O. first developed her symptoms while she was taking care of her very ill father with whom she was extremely close. Some of her initial symptoms were loss of appetite to the extent of not eating, weakness, anemia, and development a severe nervous cough. Eventually she developed a severe optic headache and lost the ability to move her head, which then progressed into paralysis of both arms. Her symptoms were not solely physical as she would vacillate between a normal, mental state and a manic-type state in which she would become extremely agitated. There was even a notation of a time for which she hallucinated that the ribbons in her hair were snakes.
Toward the end of her father’s life she stopped speaking her native language of German and instead only spoke in English. A little over a year after she began taking care of her father he passed away. After his passing her symptoms grew to affect her vision, a loss of ability to focus her attention, more extreme hallucinations, and a number of suicidal attempts (Hurst, 1982).
Both Freud and Jung would acknowledge that unconscious processes are at work in this woman's problems. However, they would come to different conclusions about the origin of these problems and the method by which she should be treated.
Research Freud’s and Jung’s theories of personality using your textbook, the Internet, and the Argosy University online library resources. Based on your research, respond to the following:
•Compare and contrast Freud's view of the unconscious with Jung's view and apply this case example in your explanations.
•On what specific points would they agree and disagree regarding the purpose and manifestation of the unconscious in the case of Anna?
•How might they each approach the treatment of Anna? What might be those specific interventions? How might Anna experience these interventions considering her history?
Write a 2–3-page paper in Word format. Apply APA standards to citation of sources. Use .
Assignment 2 Bioterrorism Due Week 6 and worth 300 pointsAcco.docxBenitoSumpter862
Assignment 2: Bioterrorism
Due Week 6 and worth 300 points
According to the Department of Health and Human Services (2002), the nation's capacity to respond to bioterrorism depends largely on the ability of clinicians and public health officials to detect, manage, and effectively communicate in advance of and during a bioterrorism event.
Prepare a narrated presentation, using PowerPoint or other similar software, detailing a bioterrorism-related issue, analyzing the threat(s) that the bioterrorism-related issue poses.
In preparation for your presentation, research and review at least one (1) healthcare facility’s preparedness plan.
Note
: A video to help students record narration for the PowerPoint presentation is available in the course shell.
Prepare a twenty (20) slide presentation in which you:
Specify the key steps that healthcare managers should follow in preparing their organizations for a potential bioterrorism attack.
Outline at least two (2) possible early detection and surveillance strategies, and investigate the main ways those strategies may prompt timely interventions to effectively treat and diminish the impact of a bioterrorism threat.
Evaluate the specific preparation steps in the preparedness plan of a healthcare facility of your choosing.
Suggest at least one (1) possible improvement to promote early detection and enhanced surveillance.
Use at least four (4) recent (within the last five [5] years), quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Apply decision making models to address difficult management situations.
Develop policies that ensure compliance of healthcare delivery systems with current legislation.
Use technology and information resources to research issues in Health Care Operations Management
.
Assignment 2 Affirmative ActionAffirmative Action is a controvers.docxBenitoSumpter862
Assignment 2: Affirmative Action
Affirmative Action is a controversial topic in American society. People of all races, genders, and classes are divided on where they stand on Affirmative Action. However, the media has oversimplified Affirmative Action and many do not truly understand the policy and what it means for schools and employers. For this assignment, you will examine Executive Order 10925 and determine where you stand on this topic.
Review Executive Order 10925. A copy can be found at:
http://www.thecre.com/fedlaw/legal6/eo10925.htm
.
Then, write an organized short response (3 paragraphs) where you explain:
What is Affirmative Action as a social policy?
What were the goals of Affirmative Action? Has it been successful?
What are the basic arguments for Affirmative Action and what are those against it? Which side do you find the most convincing and why?
Be sure to support your answer with references to the textbook, appropriate outside resources, and your own personal experiences.
Create a response in 3 paragraphs to the discussion question. Cite sources and include references in your response. Submit your response to the
Discussion Area
by
Saturday, August 26, 2017
. Through
Wednesday, August 30, 2017
, review and comment on at least two peers’ responses.
.
Assignment 2 Audit Planning and Control It is common industry kno.docxBenitoSumpter862
Assignment 2: Audit Planning and Control
It is common industry knowledge that an audit plan provides the specific guidelines auditors must follow when conducting an external audit. External public accounting firms conduct external audits to ensure outside stakeholders that the company’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) or International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) standards.
Use the Internet to select a public company that appeals to you. Imagine that you are a senior partner in a public accounting firm hired to complete an audit for the chosen public company.
Write a four to six (4-6) page paper in which you:
Outline the critical steps inherent in planning an audit and designing an effective audit program. Based upon the type of company selected, provide specific details of the actions that the company should undertake during planning and designing the audit program.
Examine at least two (2) performance ratios that you would use in order to determine which analytical tests to perform. Identify the accounts that you would test, and select at least three (3) analytical procedures that you would use in your audit.
Analyze the balance sheet and income statement of the company that you have selected, and outline your method for evidence collection which should include, but not be limited to, the type of evidence to collect and the manner in which you would determine the sufficiency of the evidence.
Discuss the audit risk model, and ascertain which sampling or non-sampling techniques you would use in order to establish your preliminary judgment about materiality. Justify your response.
Assuming that the end result is an unqualified audit report, outline the primary responsibilities of the audit firm after it issues the report in question.
Use at least two (2) quality academic resources in this assignment.
Note:
Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Plan and design a generalized audit program.
Determine the nature and extent of evidence accumulated to conduct an audit after considering the unique circumstances of an engagement.
Evaluate a company’s various risk factors and the related impact to the audit process.
Evaluate effective internal controls that minimize audit risk and potentially reduce the risk of fraud.
Use technology and information resources to r.
Assignment 2 American ConstitutionFollowing the Revolutionary War.docxBenitoSumpter862
Assignment 2: American Constitution
Following the Revolutionary War and separation from England, the need for a new government was clear. A group of men, who became known as the “nation’s founders” or Founding Fathers, developed a new government based on principles and beliefs they knew through their experiences, readings, and study. The Founding Fathers had a great deal in common with each other, including property interests, education, and extensive political experience. These common experiences and birthrights created a strong consensus about what should be incorporated into the government that would replace England’s.
Troubles developed immediately upon establishment of the United States of America with the 1781 Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union. Economic difficulties and means of dividing power between leaders and competing interests caused conflict. The conflicts had to be resolved, and some of the Founding Fathers and others, who would come to be known as the Framers went to Philadelphia to revise the Articles of Confederation. However, it became apparent immediately that the Articles could not be revised, and therefore, they were abandoned, and the Framers set about to create a new form of government. Though the effort was eventually successful and resulted in the Constitution, there was a great deal of conflict during its development in the summer of 1787. The form of government established incorporated the ideas of diverse groups, as well as the Framers’ recognition of the need for compromise.
Research the history of the American Constitution using the Argosy University online library resources. Respond to
one
question from each of the question sets A and B.
A. Creating the Constitution
Consider the three constitutional proposals: the Virginia Plan, the New Jersey Plan, and the Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise. If you were a delegate and without the experience of the past 200 years, which constitutional proposal would you have supported? Why?
Why do you think the framers were silent on the issue of slavery in the wording of the Constitution? What were the strengths and weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation?
What were the issues in the Constitutional Convention? Who were the Federalists and Anti-Federalists?
B. Living with the Constitution
What are the formal and informal methods of constitutional change?
How do checks and balances work in the lawmaking process today? Which current and important events do you think are examples of the success of checks and balances?
Do you think the Constitution is a relevant political document for the twenty-first century? What new amendments might be appropriate today?
Write your response to each in 150–200 words.
By
Saturday, February 4, 2017
, post your response to the appropriate
Discussion Area
. Through
Wednesday, February 8, 2017
, review and comment on at least three peers’ responses.
.
Assignment 2 A Crime in CentervaleWhile patrolling during his shi.docxBenitoSumpter862
Assignment 2: A Crime in Centervale
While patrolling during his shift, a Centervale police officer, Detective Johnson, saw two men standing on a street corner. Johnson observed the two proceed alternately back and forth between the street ahead and the corner, pausing and returning to conference. Detective Johnson found this strange as the Love's Jeweler shop was down the street. The two men repeated this ritual alternately three to four times, which appeared as if they were looking out for someone or were about to steal something. Detective Johnson saw a third man approach and handing something to one of the two men, which he stuffed into his pocket.
Detective Johnson approached the three men and identified himself as a policeman. He saw the man that stuffed the item in his pocket place his hand in his pocket again. Detective Johnson kept his eyes on the man and asked their names. Before they could answer, the detective turned the man around, patted down his outside clothing, and felt a hard object. The man objected saying, "Hey man, you can't do that. I have rights. I want my lawyer." Detective Johnson sneered, "Oh! you'll get your lawyer." Upon feeling the object, the officer removed his gun and asked the three to raise their hands and place them on the wall. The officer patted each man down and found a gun in the pocket of one man. He removed the jacket of another man and found a diamond ring in the inside pocket. The third man did not have anything in his pockets.
The three were taken to the police station and charged with grand theft and burglary. One of the men was also charged for carrying a concealed weapon. Detective Johnson ran the information concerning the gun and found that it matched the gun related to an aggravated battery and rape case from a year ago. The detective questioned Danny, the man who had the gun. At first, Danny did not want to say anything, but the detective continued questioning him. After three hours, Danny confessed to the aggravated battery and rape case. He denied being involved in the grand theft and burglary.
Danny had a first appearance in the court within three days, whereupon he is appointed an attorney but denied bail. Danny does not see his attorney until the next court appearance. The attorney asks what he wants to do and Danny said, "I want to fight it man." The attorney tells Danny, "That's not going to work; the DA is offering you a good deal if you plea." Over the objection of the victim in the court, the DA offers Danny probation if he testifies against the other two in the burglary case. The DA wants the other two to be sentenced to ten years in that case. While shaking his head, Danny pleads guilty above the cries of the victim. The DA asks the judge to hold off on sentencing until after he testifies in the other trial.
After Danny testifies against the other two defendants and they are sentenced to ten years, Danny goes back to the court. The judge, not agreeing with the deal, decides to sent.
Assignment 2 (RA 1) Analysis of Self-ImageIn this assignment, yo.docxBenitoSumpter862
Assignment 2: (RA 1): Analysis of Self-Image
In this assignment, you will identify and discuss factors that contribute to self-image during middle childhood and adolescence.
Write a 6-page research paper on factors influencing self-image during middle childhood and adolescence.
Tasks:
Conduct a review from professional literature—articles from peer-reviewed journals and relevant textbooks—on the factors influencing self-image during middle childhood and adolescence. Topics to consider include:
Family constellation
Risk and protective factors
Various aspects of cultural identity
Physical characteristics
Social interactions with peers
.
Assignment 1Write a 2-3 page outline describing the health to.docxBenitoSumpter862
Assignment
1:
Write a 2-3 page outline describing the health topic you’ve been assigned and develop a justification/rationale for an educational intervention.
Assignment
2:
Develop a graphic organizer for their topic.
The Graphic Organizer is intended to provide visual cues to enhance learning.
The graphic organizers should be included with your unit plan.
.
assignment 1The idea of living in a country where all policy sh.docxBenitoSumpter862
assignment 1
The idea of living in a country where “all policy shall be based on the weight of evidence” seems unreal for me. However this idea does not seems so crazy for Neil deGrasse Tyson, who believes this idea could work in a country. But could it really work?
The ‘Rationalia’ proposal is about that every idea need to be based on something. It means everything has to follow a process which is gathering data, observation, experimenting and having a conclusion. For a policy to get approved it needs to have the weight of evidence to support it, if it does not have it, then it will not get approve. I found it very interesting how white supremacy supported African slavery and how there was an effort to restricted the reproduction of other races. I feel like this would turn into a chaotic country because there are so many things that science cannot explain, scientist have theories only. Like most of the ancient civilization that had big constructions, ex: The Incas in Peru, there is no explanation for how the Machu Picchu ruins were constructed, or like the Pyramids in Egypt. As the scientist keep researching, new theories originate and no conclusion is made.
I do not think religion has all the answers also. Why were women not able to touch their husbands or feed their animals while menstruating? Why a women would be considered contaminated or not pure base on something as normal as menstruation. Or the idea of it is okay for men to have multiple wives but it was not okay for women to get married twice? I do believe that there is a God, but the idea of the men been superior in both science and religion makes me feel frustrated as a woman. It would be very difficult for a country to be ruled by science or by God only. I feel that there should always be a balance between science and religion, even though both want to compete with each other and have the ultimate opinion. There are somethings that I disagree with both of them. There is no need to keep fighting against each other, even the pope supported the scientific view of evolution, and as the article “Nonoverlapping Magisteria” by Stephen Jay Gould said “The Catholic Church had never opposed evolution and had no reason to do so”. For some people like me, science and religion go together.
assigment 2
In the first reading “Reflections on Rationalia” by Neil deGrasse Tyson, Tyson discusses an idea of developing a virtual world in which all its policies have to be founded based on evidence, meaning that the state would be undergoing constant research, forming a foundation for its government and how its citizens should think. Within the proposal for the new state, Tyson says that a great amount of funding will be given to the continued study of the human sciences, along with extensive training for the young to learn how to obtain, analyze and gather conclusions on data, and citizens would have the freedom to be irrational, simply no policies will be made with.
Assignment 1Recognizing the Role of Adhering to the Standar.docxBenitoSumpter862
Assignment 1:
Recognizing the Role of Adhering to the Standard of Care
When providing health care, there are standards of care which a reasonably prudent provider should follow. Providers at all levels are held to these standards of care. Failure to provide competent care to your patients will put you at risk for malpractice. Remaining current with the evidenced-based guidelines and providing optimal care will minimize the risk of liability.
For this Assignment, you will create a PowerPoint presentation that explains any legal implications that exist for failure to adhere to a standard of care, the key elements of malpractice, and compare the differences in malpractice policy options.
To prepare:
Consider the importance of using professional resources such as the National Guideline Clearinghouse to guide care delivered
Create a PowerPoint presentation no more than 15 slides in length that addresses the following:
Identify and explain any legal implications that exist for failure to adhere to a standard of care
Identify and explain the key elements of malpractice
Compare the differences in malpractice policy options
.
Assignment 1Argument MappingWrite a four to five (4-5.docxBenitoSumpter862
Assignment 1:
Argument Mapping
Write a four to five (4-5) page paper in which you:
(
Note:
Refer to Demonstration Exercise 3 located at the end of Chapter 1 for criteria 1-3.)
1.
Create an argument map based on the influence diagram presented in Case 1.3 and complete all the criteria provided in the exercise, beginning with this claim: “The U.S. should return to the 55- mph speed limit in order to conserve fuel and save lives.”
2.
Include in the map as many warrants, backings, objections, and rebuttals as possible.
3.
Assume that the original qualifier was
certainly;
indicate whether the qualifier changes as we move from a simple, static, uncontested argument to a complex, dynamic and contested argument.
(
Note:
Refer to Demonstration Exercise 3 located at the end of Chapter 8 for criterion 4.)
4.
Apply the argument mapping procedures presented in Chapter 8 to analyze the pros and cons (or strengths and weaknesses) of the recommendations that the United States should
not
intervene in the Balkans.
(
Note:
Refer to Demonstration Exercise 4 located at the end of Chapter 8 for criteria 5-7.)
Demonstration exercise 3 chapter 1
Create an argument map based on the influence diagram presented in Case 1.3. Begin with the following claim: “The United States should return to the 55 mph speed limit in order to conserve fuel and save lives.” Include in your map as many warrants, backings, objections, and rebuttals as you can. Assuming that the original qualifier was certainly, indicate whether the qualifier changes as we move from a simple, static, uncontested argument to a complex, dynamic, and contested argument
Influence diagram presented in case 1.3
CASE 1.3 THE INFLUENCE DIAGRAM AND DECISION TREE—STRUCTURING PROBLEMS OF ENERGY POLICY AND INTERNATIONAL SECURIY
Along with other policy-analytic methods discussed earlier in this chapter (Figure 1.1), the influence diagram and decision tree are useful tools for structuring policy problems.52 The influence diagram (Figure C1.3) displays the policy, the National Maximum Speed Limit, as a rectangle. A rectangle always refers to a policy choice or decision node, which in this case is the choice between adopting and not adopting the national maximum speed limit of 55 mph. To the right and above the decision node are uncertain events, represented as ovals, which are connected to the decision node with arrows showing how the speed limit affects or is affected by them. The rectangles with shaved corners represent valued policy outcomes or objectives. The objectives are to lower fuel consumption, reduce travel time, reduce injuries, and avert traffic fatalities. To the right of the objectives is another shaved rectangle, which designates the net benefits (benefits less costs) of the four objectives. The surprising result of using the influence diagram for problem structuring is the discovery of causally relevant economic events, such as the recession and unemployment, .
Assignment 121. Create a GUI application that contains textboxes.docxBenitoSumpter862
Assignment 12
1. Create a GUI application that contains
textboxes
for first name, last name and title. The app should also contain one button (with the text "Format!"). Once a user filles in textboxes and clicks the button the user-entered info should be displayed in a
label
formatted with one space between the title, first name, and last name.
2. Create a GUI higher/lower guessing game that lets a user guess a number between 1 and 111 (you can either randomly assign the secret number or hardcode it). Let the user enter his/her guess in a
textbox
then click a Submit button to submit his/her guess. If the guess is too low change the form color to YELLOW. If the guess is too high change the form color to BLUE. If the guess is correct change the form color to GREEN and display the number of guesses it took.
.
Assignment 1.3 Assignment 1.3 Article Review Read the article .docxBenitoSumpter862
Assignment 1.3
Assignment 1.3 Article Review
Read the article Social Service or Social Change, available in attachments. Review this article, using the Article Review format provided. Please note there are three sections of an article review.
The first is a brief summary of the article. The second, the Critique, is
about
your opinion of the information presented in the article, and the third, the Application, is about how you might use this information in the future. The Article Review template is located in attachments.
.
Assignment 1Answer the following questions concisely (no.docxBenitoSumpter862
Assignment 1
Answer the following questions concisely (no more than half a page per question)
1.
What is the National Prevention Strategy and who is responsible for it?
2. What are the differences among community health, population health, and global health?
3. Which federal department in the United States is the government’s principal agency for protecting the health of all Americans and for providing essential human services, especially to those who are least able to help themselves? What major services does this department provide?
4. How do state and local health departments interface?
5. What significance do you think Healthy People 2020 will have in the years ahead?
.
Assignment 1 Victims’ RightsThe death penalty is one of the mos.docxBenitoSumpter862
Assignment 1: Victims’ Rights
The death penalty is one of the most controversial topics in the criminal justice system. In the US criminal justice system, the government represents the victim. At the time of sentencing, many states allow victim impact statements. There are additional issues to consider in the application of the death penalty. Some of these issues are race, age, and cost.
Use the Argosy University Online Library resources to research the role of the victims in sentencing a defendant.
Submission Details:
By
June 28
, 2017
, post your responses to the following topics to this
Discussion Area
.
Discuss what you learned, focusing on such topics as racial disparity, juveniles, and victim impact statements. Be sure to cite your sources of information in the APA style.
Describe a specific case you learned about in the news where victims' rights figured prominently (either in a positive or in a negative way).
.
Assignment 1 Unreasonable Searches and SeizuresThe Fourth Amend.docxBenitoSumpter862
Assignment 1: Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
The Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution protects citizens' rights to be free from unreasonable governmental intrusion. The text of the amendment reads: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
There are many legal safeguards in place to ensure that police officers interfere with citizens' Fourth Amendment rights under limited circumstances. In Centervale, there have been several citizen complaints about Fourth Amendment violations by the local police department. The Centervale chief of police, Charles Draper, has determined that the behavior of some police officers reveals a lack of consistent understanding of the criminal justice concepts dealing with the Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches and unreasonable seizures.
Submission Details:
By
Monday
, post to the
Discussion Area
your response to the following:
Explain what constitutes an unreasonable search or seizure.
Use examples to support your response.
Explain how the exclusionary rule and fruit of the poisonous tree apply.
.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Safalta Digital marketing institute in Noida, provide complete applications that encompass a huge range of virtual advertising and marketing additives, which includes search engine optimization, virtual communication advertising, pay-per-click on marketing, content material advertising, internet analytics, and greater. These university courses are designed for students who possess a comprehensive understanding of virtual marketing strategies and attributes.Safalta Digital Marketing Institute in Noida is a first choice for young individuals or students who are looking to start their careers in the field of digital advertising. The institute gives specialized courses designed and certification.
for beginners, providing thorough training in areas such as SEO, digital communication marketing, and PPC training in Noida. After finishing the program, students receive the certifications recognised by top different universitie, setting a strong foundation for a successful career in digital marketing.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
10421, 736 AM Rubric Assessment - MHC6306-Human Resource Ma
1. 10/4/21, 7:36 AM Rubric Assessment - MHC6306-Human
Resource Management in Healthcare Organizations SU01 -
South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubr
ic/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=81520&evalObjectId=415
122&evalObjectType=1&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId
=251905&… 1/3
Associated Learning Objectives
MHC6306.01 HR function related to strategic planning
Assessment Method: Score on Criteria - IMPORTANCE OF
IDENTIFIED ROLES: Describe and assess the importance of
each role and how it relates to the organization
Required Performance: Satisfactory (C range) (21-23)
MHC6306.03 Job analysis
Assessment Method: Score on Criteria - IMPORTANCE OF
IDENTIFIED ROLES: Describe and assess the importance of
each role and how it relates to the organization
Required Performance: Satisfactory (C range) (21-23)
Close
Print RubricMHC6306 Week 3 Project Rubric
Course: MHC6306-Human Resource Management in Healthcare
Organizations SU01
2. Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through
D range) (1–17)
1 point
Satisfactory (C range)
(18-19)
19 points
Proficient (B range)
(20 - 22)
22 points
Exemplary (A range)
(23-25)
25 points
Criterion Score
EDUCATIONAL
QUALIFICATIONS
: Explain the
education
qualifications
needed for each
position/ role
3. / 25
CREDENTIALING
AND LICENSING:
Outline the
requirements for
the identified roles
/ 25
Student did not
submit assignment.
Student attempted to
explain the
educational
qualifications of the
positions, but did not
provide sufficient
understanding in the
explanation
Student explained the
4. educational
qualifications of each
position using two to
three resources
Student explained the
educational
qualifications for
each position using
two to three scholarly
resources
Student explained the
educational
qualifications for
each position using
three to five scholarly
resources
Student did not
submit assignment.
5. Student attempted to
outline the
requirements for
licensing and
credentialing for the
positions but did not
demonstrate
sufficient
understanding
Student outlined the
requirements for
licensing and
credentialing using
two to three
resources
Student outlined the
requirements for
licensing and
6. credentialing using
two to three scholarly
resources
Student outlined the
requirements for
licensing and
credentialing using
three to five scholarly
resources
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through
D range) (1–20)
20 points
Satisfactory (C range)
(21-23)
23 points
Proficient (B range)
(24-26)
26 points
Exemplary (A range)
7. (27-30)
30 points
Criterion Score
IMPORTANCE OF
IDENTIFIED
ROLES: Describe
and assess the
importance of
each role and how
it relates to the
organization
/ 30
Student did not
submit assignment.
Student attempted to
describe and assess
the importance of
each role but did not
demonstrate
8. sufficient
understanding
Student described
and assessed each
role using two to
three resources
Student described
and assessed each
role using two to
three scholarly
resources
Student described
and assessed each
role using three to
five scholarly
resources
javascript://
javascript://
9. 10/4/21, 7:36 AM Rubric Assessment - MHC6306-Human
Resource Management in Healthcare Organizations SU01 -
South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubr
ic/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=81520&evalObjectId=415
122&evalObjectType=1&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId
=251905&… 2/3
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through
D range) (1–20)
20 points
Satisfactory (C range)
(21-23)
23 points
Proficient (B range)
(24-26)
26 points
Exemplary (A range)
(27-30)
30 points
Criterion Score
SCOPE OF
PRACTICE: Define
the scope of each
10. identified role
/ 30
Student did not
submit assignment
Student attempted to
define the scope of
each position in the
organization, but did
not demonstrate
sufficient
understanding
Student defined the
scope of each role in
the organization
using two to three
resources
Student defined the
scope of each role in
11. the organization
using two to three
scholarly resources
Student defined the
scope of each role in
the organization
using three to five
scholarly resources
Criteria
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through
D range) (1–17)
1 point
Satisfactory (C range)
(18-19)
19 points
Proficient (B range)
(20-22)
22 points
Exemplary (A range)
(23-25)
25 points
12. Criterion Score
LEGAL ASPECTS:
Assess the legal
aspects affecting
HRM in the
healthcare setting
/ 25
CLIMATE AND
DIVERSITY: Utilize
critical thinking to
prepare a plan that
builds a climate of
trust and respect
among employees
incorporating the
importance of
diversity in the
workforce
13. / 25
Student did not
submit assignment
Student attempted to
assess the legal
aspects of HRM in
the healthcare setting
but did not
demonstrate
sufficient
understanding
Student assess the
legal aspects of HRM
in healthcare using
two to three
resources
Student assess the
legal aspects of HRM
14. in healthcare using
two to three scholarly
resources
Student assess the
legal aspects of HRM
in healthcare using
three to five scholarly
resources
iStudent did not
submit assignment
Student attempted to
prepare a plan
building a climate f
trust and respect
while incorporating
the importance of
diversity in the
workforce but did not
15. demonstrate
sufficient
understanding
Student prepared a
critically thought out
plan that builds a
climate of trust and
respect among the
workforce while
incorporating the
importance of
diversity using two to
three resources
Student prepared a
critically thought out
plan that builds a
climate of trust and
respect among the
16. workforce while
incorporating the
importance of
diversity using two to
three scholarly
resources
Student prepared a
critically thought out
plan that builds a
climate of trust and
respect among the
workforce while
incorporating the
importance of
diversity using three
to five scholarly
resources
Criteria
No Submission
17. 0 points
Emerging (F through
D range) (1–9)
9 points
Satisfactory (C range)
(10-12)
10 points
Proficient (B range)
(13-14)
13 points
Exemplary (A range)
(15)
15 points
Criterion Score
10/4/21, 7:36 AM Rubric Assessment - MHC6306-Human
Resource Management in Healthcare Organizations SU01 -
South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubr
ic/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=81520&evalObjectId=415
122&evalObjectType=1&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId
=251905&… 3/3
Total / 175
Overall Score
Criteria
18. No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through
D range) (1–9)
9 points
Satisfactory (C range)
(10-12)
10 points
Proficient (B range)
(13-14)
13 points
Exemplary (A range)
(15)
15 points
Criterion Score
LANGUAGE
MECHANICS:
Present a
structured
presentation free
of spelling and
grammatical errors
and properly cited
19. sources using APA
format.
/ 15
Student did not
submit assignment.
Contains many (≥ 5)
grammar, spelling,
punctuation and APA
errors that interfere
with the reader’s
understanding.
Contains a few (3-4)
grammar, spelling,
punctuation and APA
errors.
Uses correct
grammar, spelling,
and punctuation with
20. no errors. Contains a
few (1–2) APA format
errors.
Uses correct
grammar, spelling,
and punctuation with
no errors. Uses
correct APA format
with no errors.
No Submission
0 points minimum
Emerging (F through D range)
1 point minimum
Satisfactory (C range)
122 points minimum
Proficient (B range)
140 points minimum
Exemplary (A range)
157 points minimum
21. 10/4/21, 7:35 AM Rubric Assessment - MHC6306-Human
Resource Management in Healthcare Organizations SU01 -
South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubr
ic/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=81520&evalObjectId=406
872&evalObjectType=5&userId=4901&groupId=0&rubricId=65
74&d2l_b… 1/4
Close
Print RubricSUO Discussion Rubric (80 Points) - Version 1.2
Course: MHC6306-Human Resource Management in Healthcare
Organizations SU01
Response
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F-D: 1-27)
27 points
Satisfactory (C: 28-
31)
31 points
Proficient (B: 32-35)
35 points
Exemplary (A: 36-40)
40 points
Criterion Score
Quality of Initial
22. Posting
/ 40
No initial posting exists to
evaluate.
The information provided is
inaccurate, not focused on
the assignment’s topic,
and/or does not answer
the question(s) fully.
Response demonstrates
incomplete understanding
of the topic and/or
inadequate preparation.
The information provided is
accurate, giving a basic
understanding of the
topic(s) covered. A basic
understanding is when you
are able to describe the
23. terms and concepts
covered. Despite this basic
understanding, initial
posting may not include
complete development of
all aspects of the
assignment.
The information provided is
accurate, displaying a good
understanding of the
topic(s) covered. A good
understanding is when you
are able to explain the
terms and topics covered.
Initial posting
demonstrates sincere
reflection and addresses
most aspects of the
24. assignment, although all
concepts may not be fully
developed.
The information provided is
accurate, providing an in-
depth, well thought-out
understanding of the
topic(s) covered. An in-
depth understanding
provides an analysis of the
information, synthesizing
what is learned from the
course/assigned readings.
Participation
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F-D: 1-13)
13 points
Satisfactory (C: 14-
16)
26. 20 points
Criterion Score
Participation in
Discussion
/ 20
No responses to other
classmates were posted in
this discussion forum.
May include one or more
of the following:
*Comments to only one
other student's post.
*Comments are not
substantive, such as just
one line or saying, “Good
job” or “I agree.
*Comments are off topic.
Comments to two or more
classmates’ initial posts but
27. only on one day of the
week. Comments are
substantive, meaning they
reflect and expand on what
the other student wrote.
Comments to two or more
classmates’ initial posts on
more than one day.
Comments are substantive,
meaning they reflect and
expand on what the other
student wrote.
Comments to two or more
classmates’ initial posts and
to the instructor's
comment (if applicable) on
two or more days.
Responses demonstrate an
28. analysis of peers’
comments, building on
previous posts. Comments
extend and deepen
meaningful conversation
and may include a follow-
up question.
Writing
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F-D: 1-13)
13 points
Satisfaction (C: 14-
16)
16 points
Proficient (B: 17-18)
18 points
Exemplary (A: 19-20)
20 points
Criterion Score
29. 10/4/21, 7:35 AM Rubric Assessment - MHC6306-Human
Resource Management in Healthcare Organizations SU01 -
South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubr
ic/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=81520&evalObjectId=406
872&evalObjectType=5&userId=4901&groupId=0&rubricId=65
74&d2l_b… 3/4
Total / 80
Writing
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F-D: 1-13)
13 points
Satisfaction (C: 14-
16)
16 points
Proficient (B: 17-18)
18 points
Exemplary (A: 19-20)
20 points
Criterion Score
Writing Mechanics
(Spelling,
Grammar, Citation
30. Style) and
Information
Literacy
/ 20
No postings for which to
evaluate language and
grammar exist.
Numerous issues in any of
the following: grammar,
mechanics, spelling, use of
slang, and incomplete or
missing citations and
references. If required for
the assignment, did not use
course, text, and/or
outside readings (where
relevant) to support work.
Some spelling, grammatical,
and/or structural errors are
31. present. Some errors in
formatting citations and
references are present. If
required for the
assignment, utilizes sources
to support work for initial
post but not comments to
other students. Sources
include course/text
readings but outside
sources (when relevant)
include non-
academic/authoritative,
such as Wikis and .com
resources.
Minor errors in grammar,
mechanics, or spelling in
the initial posting are
32. present. Minor errors in
formatting citations and
references may exist. If
required for the
assignment, utilizes sources
to support work for both
the initial post and some of
the comments to other
students. Sources include
course and text readings as
well as outside sources
(when relevant) that are
academic and authoritative
(e.g., journal articles, other
text books, .gov Web sites,
professional organization
Web sites, cases, statutes,
or administrative rules).
33. Minor to no errors exist in
grammar, mechanics, or
spelling in both the initial
post and comments to
others. Formatting of
citations and references is
correct. If required for the
assignment, utilizes sources
to support work for both
the initial post and the
comments to other
students. Sources include
course and text readings as
well as outside sources
(when relevant) that are
academic and authoritative
(e.g., journal articles, other
text books, .gov Web sites,
34. professional organization
Web sites, cases, statutes,
or administrative rules).
10/4/21, 7:35 AM Rubric Assessment - MHC6306-Human
Resource Management in Healthcare Organizations SU01 -
South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubr
ic/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=81520&evalObjectId=406
872&evalObjectType=5&userId=4901&groupId=0&rubricId=65
74&d2l_b… 4/4
Overall Score
No Submission
0 points minimum
There was no
submission for this
assignment.
Emerging (F to D Range)
1 point minimum
Satisfactory progress has not been met on
the competencies for this assignment.
36. Let’s learn about the differences among a job design, a job
analysis, and a job description.
Aspect Definition Purpose Use
Job Design
A job design is primarily
concerned with
designing the job to
match the employees’
skill sets with the job
and then using these
skills to improve
organizational
performance.
The purpose of a job
design is to improve
employee motivation
and productivity.
A job design is used to
address problems such as:
overload
37. hours
Job
Analysis
A job analysis involves
knowing the nature and
characteristics of the
people to be employed
for the jobs.
The purpose of a job
analysis is to document
the requirements of a
job and the work
performed.
A job analysis is used for:
retention
development
38. Job
Description
A job description is a
written statement of a
specific job, which
includes duties,
responsibilities, and
working conditions
required for the job.
The purpose of a job
description is to
capture the skills,
experience,
qualifications,
knowledge, and
attributes that are
required to perform a
job successfully.
A job description is used
for:
qualifications and
experience required for
the job
MHC6306 WEEK 3 LECTURE, DISCUSSION, & PROJECT
INSTRUCTIONS
39. 1
Job Design; Analysis; and Description
A job design refers to arranging tasks related to a job in a way
that helps increase productivity, operational efficiency, and
quality and reduce job dissatisfaction. As a human resources
professional, you must ensure that the employees meet these
objectives and that the objectives are tied directly to the
analysis and description of any job within the organization.
So, you have learned about the role of HRM in dealing with job
design, job analysis, and job descriptions. In addition, you will
focus on performance management, employee relations, and the
disciplinary process.
Resources:
Cogin, J. A., Ju Li, N., & Lee, I. (2016). Controlling healthcare
professionals: How human resource management influences job
attitudes and operational efficiency. Human Resources for
Health, 14
doi:https://su.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.co
m/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=118354459&site=eds-
live
Sadatsafavi, H., M.A., & Walewski, J., PhD. (2013). Corporate
sustainability: The environmental design and human resource
management interface in healthcare settings. HERD : Health
Environments Research & Design Journal, 6(2), 98-118.
Retrieved from
https://su.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/lo
gin.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=90392208&site=eds-live
40. Additional Materials
Performance Management in Healthcare
Performance management is a process that helps gauge an
organization's progress toward its goals. It sets the organization
on a path toward achieving excellence in the organization's
objectives.
Performance management also helps employees know their
contributions toward achieving the organization's objectives. In
addition, it helps employees know that their contributions are
recognized and acknowledged.
Knowing the contribution of an employee toward achieving
organization goals requires a two-way communication between
the reviewed and the reviewer.
The steps of the two-way communication process are given
below.
1. Clarifying expectations: Performance management begins
with a discussion between the reviewee and the reviewer
regarding:
· Expectations
· Objectives
· Goals
2. Setting objectives: The expectations, objectives, and goals
set in the first step are evaluated periodically.
3. Providing feedback: The reviewer provides periodic feedback
to the reviewee. The feedback must include a discussion on:
· Expected results
· Achieved results
· Refinement of objectives to meet current situations
· Removal of barriers to the achievement of results
4. Evaluating performance: The performance should be
evaluated at the end of the year. The performance evaluation
discussion must include:
41. · Variances in performance
· Next year's objectives, goals, and expectations
· Ratings
An effective performance management process can be an
effective motivator for employees. It can help the HR
professionals and the employees achieve the best possible
performance for the organization.
In this lecture you analyzed and designed a job description for a
healthcare organization, understand performance management in
healthcare organizations, and examined the common practices
and processes in addressing employee relations. Next you will
learn about the importance of HRM in dealing with job design,
job analysis, and job descriptions. You also learned about
performance management, employee relations, and the
disciplinary process.
Resources:
van, d. R., Van, d. B., & S.R. Segers, M. (2013). Understanding
informal feedback seeking in the workplace. European Journal
of Training and Development, 37(1), 72-85.
https://su.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/lo
gin.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1005938&site=eds-live
Clarke, M. A., & Hill, S. R. (2012). Promoting employee
wellbeing and quality service outcomes: The role of HRM
practices. Journal of Management and Organization, 18(5), 702-
713.
https://search-proquest-
com.southuniversity.libproxy.edmc.edu/docview/1268167617?a
ccountid=87314
Employee Relations
Employee relations are important for the success of HRM
because it is the responsibility of HRM to manage and monitor
employees.
An HR professional acts as an advisor or leader for the
employees. The HR professional can foster a productive and
42. positive work environment only in consultation with employees
and departmental heads.
Employee relations include a variety of activities, such as:
· Coaching and training employees on the performance
management system or on employee rights
· Advising employees on policies and procedures
· Advising employees on the disciplinary process or corrective
actions to take
· Handling conflicts, disputes, or grievances through mediation
and resolution
· Ensuring compliance with employee contracts
· Educating the employees with queries related to the employee
handbook
· Investigating complaints or charges of noncompliance with
regulations
These types of issues must get addressed in a timely manner to
keep empowering employees to perform successfully. For
example, complaints of sexual harassment, discrimination, or
other work-related concerns are serious issues that HR
professionals must address quickly. They must resolve any
issues that interrupt the positive and productive work
environment, as such issues hamper the achievement of
organizational objectives.
One of the responsibilities of HR professionals is to ensure
compliance in the disciplinary process. The discipl inary process
is a method employers use to inform employees that something
is wrong. It generally comes into effect in the case of an
allegation of improper conduct against an employee.
So you learned about designing a job description for a
healthcare organization. The unit also focused on understanding
performance management in healthcare organizations. In
addition, you examined the common practices and processes in
addressing employee relations. Next, you will learn some
exciting and informative facts about healthcare recruitment,
selection, and retention and will t also focuses on methods,
metrics, and best practices related to recruitment, selection, and
43. retention.
Resource:
Malvey, Donna,M.H.S.A., PhD. (2010). Unionization in
healthcare strategies. Journal of Healthcare Management, 55(4),
236-40. Retrieved from https://search-proquest-
com.southuniversity.libproxy.edmc.edu/docview/742470084?acc
ountid=87314
Week 3 Discussion
Before beginning work on this discussion forum, please review
the link “Doing Discussion Questions Right,” the expanded
grading rubric for the forum, and any specific instructions for
this topic.
Before the end of the week, begin commenting on at least two
of your classmates’ responses. You can ask technical questions
or respond generally to the overall experience. Be objective,
clear, and concise. Always use constructive language, even in
criticism, to work toward the goal of positive progress. Submit
your responses in the Discussion Area.
Job Description, Analysis, and Design and Mutual Respect and
Trust
The knowledge of jobs is used for many purposes, certainly in
the field of HRM for healthcare organizations. In particular,
knowledge of what a job requires an employee to do—the basis
for pay—is essential to make comparisons with other jobs for
market pricing and as the first step in evaluating jobs internally.
Today and every day, as leaders or managers, we want to
44. emphasize the golden rule of treating others the way we want to
be treated. We are working with a diverse team of people from
many cultures, traditions, backgrounds, and belief. This is what
makes us a strong, effective, and successful healthcare
organization.
Tasks:
In a minimum of 200 words, post to the Discussion Area your
responses to the following:
· Consider the differences among a job description, a job
analysis, and a job design. What is the importance of each in
healthcare HRM?
· How would you foster a climate of mutual respect and trust
among your team members?
· Suppose you are developing the job description, analysis, and
design for a clinical team leader position. Does diversity relate
to the position at all? Explain your answer. If yes, how will you
address it?
To support your work, use your course and textbook readings
and also use the South University Online Library. As in all
assignments, cite your sources in your work and provide
references for the citations in APA format.
Week 3 Project
Instructions
Before beginning work on this assignment, please review
the expanded grading rubric for specific instructions relating to
content and formatting.
In this assignment, you will explore the differences among
educational levels, the scopes of practice, and credentialing and
licensure requirements for various employees in a healthcare
organization.
Scenario: You are the HR manager of a newly established
healthcare organization. The board of directors of the
organization asks you to prepare a presentation on the required
45. profiles for the following roles:
· Administrator (i.e., chief executive officer, vice president of
nursing or finance, etc.)
· Physician
· Registered nurse
· Nurse's aide
· Laboratory technician
· Dietary aide
· Maintenance professional
Tasks:
For each role, provide the following information:
· Educational qualifications required for the role
· Scope of practice for the role
· Credentialing and licensure requirements for the role
· A description of the importance of the role in a healthcare
organization
· Explain the legal aspects of the HRM role.
For the workforce as a whole, address the following:
· How would you build and maintain a climate of mutual respect
and trust among employees?
· What is the importance of diversity in the workforce?
Submission Details:
· To support your work, use your course and textbook readings
and also use the South University Online Library. As in all
assignments, cite your sources in your work and provide
references for the citations in APA format.
· Your assignment should be addressed in a 16- to 20-
PowerPoint presentation.